首页 > 最新文献

Nicotine & Tobacco Research最新文献

英文 中文
Discrimination Distress and Current Combustible and Non-combustible Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth, 2023. 歧视困扰和当前可燃和不可燃烟草产品在美国青年中的使用,2023。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf166
Meman Diaby, Osayande Agbonlahor, Maggie K Richardson, Joy L Hart, Shyanika W Rose, Delvon T Mattingly

Introduction: Discrimination is the unfair treatment of people based on their identity. Youth who experience discrimination may cope with associated distress by using tobacco products, with amplified health consequences depending on the type of product.

Methods: We used data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (n = 22 069) and derived an overall continuous measure from the 15-item Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index, as well as three continuous discrimination distress sub-indices: educational, institutional, and peer (range for each: 0-5). We defined current tobacco use as two outcomes: any past 30-day use of combustible (cigarettes, cigars, hookah, roll-your-own, pipe, bidis) and non-combustible (e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snus, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches, oral nicotine) products. To estimate associations between discrimination measures and tobacco use outcomes, we conducted multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Youth experienced more educational (mean = 0.56) than peer (mean = 0.48) and institutional (mean = 0.38) discrimination distress, and the prevalence of current combustible and non-combustible tobacco use was 3.89% and 9.67%. A single unit increase in overall discrimination distress was associated with increased odds of combustible (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.47) and non-combustible (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.39) tobacco use. For subindices, only a single unit increase in institutional discrimination distress was associated with current combustible tobacco use (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.59).

Conclusion: Overall discrimination distress was associated with current use of combustible and non-combustible tobacco products; however, only institutional discrimination distress was associated with combustible product use. These findings highlight the importance of considering discriminatory contexts as they relate to potential youth tobacco use as a distress-coping mechanism.

Implications: This study adds to the growing evidence that discrimination distress, particularly in institutional contexts, is associated with youth combustible tobacco use. By highlighting the unique role of institutional discrimination in tobacco use, our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address discriminatory environments in these settings. These results underscore the importance of integrating anti-discrimination policies and support systems into tobacco prevention efforts to reduce maladaptive behaviors among youth. This research also suggests examining how differing discrimination contexts may shape nicotine use behavior, potentially revealing insights helpful in tailoring prevention strategies.

引言:歧视是基于身份对人们的不公平对待。遭受歧视的青年可能通过使用烟草制品来应对相关的痛苦,根据产品的类型,其健康后果会放大。方法:我们使用了2023年全国青少年烟草调查(n = 22069)的数据,并从15项青少年歧视困扰指数以及三个连续歧视困扰子指数:教育、机构和同伴(范围为0-5)中得出了一个整体的连续度量。我们将当前的烟草使用定义为两种结果:任何过去30天内使用的可燃(香烟、雪茄、水烟、自制卷烟、烟斗、比迪烟)和非可燃(电子烟、无烟烟草、鼻烟、加热烟草、尼古丁袋、口服尼古丁)产品。为了估计歧视措施与烟草使用结果之间的关联,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归。结果:青少年的教育歧视(平均值= 0.56)高于同龄人(平均值= 0.48)和制度歧视(平均值= 0.38),目前可燃烟草和非可燃烟草的使用率分别为3.89%和9.67%。整体歧视痛苦的单个单位增加与可燃(AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08至1.47)和非可燃(AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09至1.39)烟草使用的几率增加有关。对于分项指数,只有一个单位的制度歧视困扰增加与目前的可燃烟草使用有关(AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06至1.59)。结论:总体歧视困扰与当前使用可燃和不可燃烟草制品有关;然而,只有制度歧视困扰与可燃产品的使用有关。这些发现强调了考虑歧视性背景的重要性,因为它们与青少年潜在的烟草使用有关,是一种应对痛苦的机制。启示:这项研究进一步证明,歧视困扰,特别是在制度背景下,与青少年使用可燃烟草有关。通过强调制度歧视在烟草使用中的独特作用,我们的研究结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施来解决这些环境中的歧视性环境。这些结果强调了将反歧视政策和支持系统纳入烟草预防工作以减少青少年适应不良行为的重要性。这项研究还建议研究不同的歧视背景如何影响尼古丁使用行为,潜在地揭示有助于制定预防策略的见解。
{"title":"Discrimination Distress and Current Combustible and Non-combustible Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth, 2023.","authors":"Meman Diaby, Osayande Agbonlahor, Maggie K Richardson, Joy L Hart, Shyanika W Rose, Delvon T Mattingly","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf166","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf166","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrimination is the unfair treatment of people based on their identity. Youth who experience discrimination may cope with associated distress by using tobacco products, with amplified health consequences depending on the type of product.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (n = 22 069) and derived an overall continuous measure from the 15-item Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index, as well as three continuous discrimination distress sub-indices: educational, institutional, and peer (range for each: 0-5). We defined current tobacco use as two outcomes: any past 30-day use of combustible (cigarettes, cigars, hookah, roll-your-own, pipe, bidis) and non-combustible (e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snus, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches, oral nicotine) products. To estimate associations between discrimination measures and tobacco use outcomes, we conducted multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth experienced more educational (mean = 0.56) than peer (mean = 0.48) and institutional (mean = 0.38) discrimination distress, and the prevalence of current combustible and non-combustible tobacco use was 3.89% and 9.67%. A single unit increase in overall discrimination distress was associated with increased odds of combustible (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.47) and non-combustible (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.39) tobacco use. For subindices, only a single unit increase in institutional discrimination distress was associated with current combustible tobacco use (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall discrimination distress was associated with current use of combustible and non-combustible tobacco products; however, only institutional discrimination distress was associated with combustible product use. These findings highlight the importance of considering discriminatory contexts as they relate to potential youth tobacco use as a distress-coping mechanism.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study adds to the growing evidence that discrimination distress, particularly in institutional contexts, is associated with youth combustible tobacco use. By highlighting the unique role of institutional discrimination in tobacco use, our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address discriminatory environments in these settings. These results underscore the importance of integrating anti-discrimination policies and support systems into tobacco prevention efforts to reduce maladaptive behaviors among youth. This research also suggests examining how differing discrimination contexts may shape nicotine use behavior, potentially revealing insights helpful in tailoring prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"97-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12723236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145092121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined chatbot and counselor support for smoking cessation in China: a pilot, mobile-based, randomized controlled trial. 联合聊天机器人和咨询师支持戒烟在中国:一个试点,基于移动,随机对照试验。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf260
Xue Weng, Kefeng Liu, Yufei Xia, Chuyu Song, Ningyuan Guo, Man Ping Wang

Introduction: Smoking cessation services in China remain unevenly accessible and underutilized. Chatbots offer a cost-effective and scalable alternative to provide cessation support. This two-arm, community-based, randomized controlled pilot trial assessed the feasibility of a chatbot- supported smoking cessation intervention and explored the potential added benefit of personalized counselor support.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=71) or a control group (n=71). Both groups received chatbot-moderated WeChat group support, while the intervention group additionally received one-on-one cessation support from trained counselors for 3 months. The primary outcome was bio-verified abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included bio-verified abstinence at 3 months, self-reported point prevalence of abstinence (PPA), and smoking reduction. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, consent, retention, and engagement rate.

Results: By intention-to-treat analysis, bio-verified abstinence was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group at 3 months (18.3% vs. 11.3%; risk ratio [RR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-3.69) and 6 months (15.5% vs. 9.9%; RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.64-3.83), though these differences were not statistically significant. Self-reported PPA and smoking reduction were similar between groups.

Discussion: The pilot trial demonstrated that combining chatbot-delivered cessation support with personalized counselor via WeChat was feasible and well accepted in community settings. Although abstinence outcomes were not significant, findings suggest that supplementing chatbot support with counselor guidance may enhance engagement and cessation outcomes. This pilot provides preliminary evidence for integrating automated and human-supported approaches into scalable community cessation programs in China.

在中国,戒烟服务的可及性和利用率仍然不均衡。聊天机器人提供了一种具有成本效益和可扩展的替代方案来提供戒烟支持。这项以社区为基础的两臂随机对照试验评估了聊天机器人支持的戒烟干预的可行性,并探讨了个性化咨询师支持的潜在附加益处。方法:将参与者随机分为干预组(n=71)和对照组(n=71)。两组都接受了聊天机器人主持的微信小组支持,而干预组还接受了训练有素的咨询师一对一的戒烟支持,为期3个月。主要终点是6个月时生物验证的戒断。次要结果包括3个月时生物验证的戒烟,自我报告的戒烟点患病率(PPA)和吸烟减少。可行性结果包括资格、同意、保留和参与率。结果:意向治疗分析显示,干预组生物验证戒断在3个月时(18.3% vs. 11.3%;风险比[RR] 1.62, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.72-3.69)和6个月时(15.5% vs. 9.9%; RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.64-3.83)均高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义。自我报告的PPA和吸烟减少在两组之间相似。讨论:试点试验表明,通过微信将聊天机器人提供的戒烟支持与个性化咨询相结合是可行的,并且在社区环境中被广泛接受。尽管戒烟结果并不显著,但研究结果表明,在咨询师的指导下补充聊天机器人支持可能会提高参与度和戒烟结果。该试点为将自动化和人工支持的方法纳入中国可扩展的社区戒烟计划提供了初步证据。
{"title":"Combined chatbot and counselor support for smoking cessation in China: a pilot, mobile-based, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Xue Weng, Kefeng Liu, Yufei Xia, Chuyu Song, Ningyuan Guo, Man Ping Wang","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf260","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking cessation services in China remain unevenly accessible and underutilized. Chatbots offer a cost-effective and scalable alternative to provide cessation support. This two-arm, community-based, randomized controlled pilot trial assessed the feasibility of a chatbot- supported smoking cessation intervention and explored the potential added benefit of personalized counselor support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=71) or a control group (n=71). Both groups received chatbot-moderated WeChat group support, while the intervention group additionally received one-on-one cessation support from trained counselors for 3 months. The primary outcome was bio-verified abstinence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included bio-verified abstinence at 3 months, self-reported point prevalence of abstinence (PPA), and smoking reduction. Feasibility outcomes included eligibility, consent, retention, and engagement rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By intention-to-treat analysis, bio-verified abstinence was higher in the intervention group compared to the control group at 3 months (18.3% vs. 11.3%; risk ratio [RR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-3.69) and 6 months (15.5% vs. 9.9%; RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.64-3.83), though these differences were not statistically significant. Self-reported PPA and smoking reduction were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The pilot trial demonstrated that combining chatbot-delivered cessation support with personalized counselor via WeChat was feasible and well accepted in community settings. Although abstinence outcomes were not significant, findings suggest that supplementing chatbot support with counselor guidance may enhance engagement and cessation outcomes. This pilot provides preliminary evidence for integrating automated and human-supported approaches into scalable community cessation programs in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlates of the use of nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine and tobacco products among United States adults: Results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 7 (2022-2023). 美国成年人使用尼古丁袋戒烟其他尼古丁和烟草产品的相关性:烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第7波(2022-2023)的结果。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf258
Juhan Lee, Simay Ipek, Andrea H Weinberger

Background: As nicotine pouches are increasingly adopted as a harm reduction method for tobacco cessation, it is important to understand who incorporates nicotine pouches into cessation attempts. This preliminary study examined correlates of nicotine pouch use for tobacco cessation in a United States (US) nationally representative sample.

Methods: Data were from Wave 7 (2022-2023) of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Outcomes were past-12-month use of nicotine pouches to quit cigarettes or other non-electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and other nicotine/tobacco products (N=3,622) and to quit ENDS (N=1,934). Predictor variables included sociodemographic, psychological, and behavioral factors.

Results: Ninety individuals reported using nicotine pouches during their most recent quit attempt for non-ENDS products, while 65 individuals reported use during the quit attempt for ENDS. Multivariable regression analyses showed that males were significantly more likely to use nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS and ENDS (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio [APR]=2.00, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.19, 3.37; APR=6.28, 95% CI=2.77, 14.25). Having used other methods to quit other nicotine/tobacco products was associated with higher likelihoods of having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS (APR=2.43, 95% CI=1.48, 4.01) and ENDS (APR=1.95, 95% CI=1.05, 3.61). Having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS was less likely to be reported by Black individuals (APR=0.31, 95% CI=0.11, 0.88).

Conclusions: This preliminary study observed positive associations of male gender and use of other cessation methods and a negative association of Black race with having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use.

Implications: In a national United States sample, having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use was more likely to be associated with being male and using other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation methods, but less likely to be associated with Black race. Ongoing surveillance and research examining the health effects of nicotine pouch use is warranted, particularly regarding sex and racial/ethnic differences in nicotine pouch use as a harm reduction approach for other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation.

背景:随着尼古丁袋越来越多地被采用为戒烟的一种减少危害的方法,了解是谁将尼古丁袋纳入戒烟尝试是很重要的。这项初步研究调查了在美国(US)具有全国代表性的样本中使用尼古丁袋戒烟的相关性。方法:数据来自美国烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第7期(2022-2023)。结果是过去12个月使用尼古丁袋戒烟或其他非电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)和其他尼古丁/烟草制品(N=3,622)和戒烟ENDS (N=1,934)。预测变量包括社会人口学、心理和行为因素。结果:90人报告在他们最近一次尝试戒烟非ENDS产品时使用了尼古丁袋,而65人报告在戒烟尝试戒烟ENDS产品时使用了尼古丁袋。多变量回归分析显示,男性使用尼古丁袋戒烟的可能性明显高于非ENDS和ENDS(调整患病率比[APR]=2.00, 95%可信区间[CI]=1.19, 3.37; APR=6.28, 95% CI=2.77, 14.25)。使用其他方法戒烟其他尼古丁/烟草制品与使用尼古丁袋戒烟非ENDS (APR=2.43, 95% CI=1.48, 4.01)和ENDS (APR=1.95, 95% CI=1.05, 3.61)的可能性较高相关。黑人使用尼古丁袋戒烟的可能性较低(APR=0.31, 95% CI=0.11, 0.88)。结论:这项初步研究观察到男性性别与使用其他戒烟方法呈正相关,黑人种族与使用尼古丁袋戒烟其他尼古丁/烟草制品负相关。含义:在美国的一个全国性样本中,使用尼古丁袋戒烟其他尼古丁/烟草产品的人更有可能是男性,并使用其他尼古丁/烟草产品的戒烟方法,但与黑人种族的联系不大可能。有必要进行持续的监测和研究,检查尼古丁袋使用对健康的影响,特别是关于尼古丁袋使用的性别和种族/民族差异,以减少其他尼古丁/烟草产品使用的危害。
{"title":"Correlates of the use of nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine and tobacco products among United States adults: Results from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 7 (2022-2023).","authors":"Juhan Lee, Simay Ipek, Andrea H Weinberger","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As nicotine pouches are increasingly adopted as a harm reduction method for tobacco cessation, it is important to understand who incorporates nicotine pouches into cessation attempts. This preliminary study examined correlates of nicotine pouch use for tobacco cessation in a United States (US) nationally representative sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from Wave 7 (2022-2023) of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Outcomes were past-12-month use of nicotine pouches to quit cigarettes or other non-electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and other nicotine/tobacco products (N=3,622) and to quit ENDS (N=1,934). Predictor variables included sociodemographic, psychological, and behavioral factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety individuals reported using nicotine pouches during their most recent quit attempt for non-ENDS products, while 65 individuals reported use during the quit attempt for ENDS. Multivariable regression analyses showed that males were significantly more likely to use nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS and ENDS (Adjusted Prevalence Ratio [APR]=2.00, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.19, 3.37; APR=6.28, 95% CI=2.77, 14.25). Having used other methods to quit other nicotine/tobacco products was associated with higher likelihoods of having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS (APR=2.43, 95% CI=1.48, 4.01) and ENDS (APR=1.95, 95% CI=1.05, 3.61). Having used nicotine pouches to quit non-ENDS was less likely to be reported by Black individuals (APR=0.31, 95% CI=0.11, 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This preliminary study observed positive associations of male gender and use of other cessation methods and a negative association of Black race with having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In a national United States sample, having used nicotine pouches to quit other nicotine/tobacco product use was more likely to be associated with being male and using other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation methods, but less likely to be associated with Black race. Ongoing surveillance and research examining the health effects of nicotine pouch use is warranted, particularly regarding sex and racial/ethnic differences in nicotine pouch use as a harm reduction approach for other nicotine/tobacco product use cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patterns of ENDS-Related Content Exposure on Social Media among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults. 美国青少年和年轻人在社交媒体上与终端相关的内容暴露模式
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf259
Jessica M Mongilio, Luisa Kcomt, Stephanie T Lanza, Emily Pasman, Jenny Clift, Rebecca J Evans-Polce

Introduction: Many U.S. adolescents and young adults (AYA) are exposed to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)-related content regularly through social media platforms. Prior research treats exposure to ENDS-related content as uniform, both in its source and theme.

Methods: This study examined the variation in frequency, source, and theme of ENDS-related content online among AYA (ages 12-25), using the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 7 (2022/23) data. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of ENDS-related content exposure among AYA who reported viewing ENDS-related content on social media in the past week (N=4,031). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations of sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco/nicotine use behaviors with class membership.

Results: Seven classes of ENDS-related content exposure were identified: 1) Memes from Friends (11.5%); 2) News & Information from Health Campaigns (7.6%); 3) Public Health Campaigns Only (23.2%); 4) Public Health Information & Memes (27.5%); 5) Celebrity/Influencer Posts (15.6%); 6) Mixed-Theme Brand Posts (3.5%); and 7) Multidimensional Frequent Exposure (11.1%). Young (ages 12-17), female, and racial/ethnic minority participants were more likely to be exposed to classes characterized by multiple types of content at higher frequencies. Past-year ENDS use was only associated with class membership in Memes from Friends relative to Public Health Campaigns Only.

Conclusions: AYA exposure to ENDS-related social media content is not uniform and may not be driven by tobacco/nicotine use. Sociodemographic groups previously targeted by combustible tobacco/nicotine marketing are more likely to be exposed to myriad ENDS-related content online.

Implications: ENDS-related content on social media is not uniform, and exposure varies considerably by source, theme, and frequency. Some exposure patterns were driven by public health information, while others were centered on entertainment and promotional content. Regulation of ENDS-related content online should be bolstered and enforced by federal institutions and social media platforms to curb promotional content for those not legally allowed to purchase or use ENDS. Additionally, future research should examine whether certain ENDS-related content exposure is associated with the tobacco/nicotine use initiation and escalation, particularly among sociodemographic groups that may be targeted to receive this content.

许多美国青少年和年轻人(AYA)经常通过社交媒体平台接触电子尼古丁传递系统(ENDS)相关内容。先前的研究认为,无论是在来源还是主题上,终端相关内容的暴露都是统一的。方法:本研究使用具有全国代表性的烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究第7波(2022/23)数据,检查了AYA(12-25岁)在线ends相关内容的频率、来源和主题的变化。潜在类别分析用于识别过去一周在社交媒体上观看ends相关内容的AYA中与ends相关的内容暴露模式(N=4,031)。使用多项逻辑回归来检验社会人口学特征和烟草/尼古丁使用行为与班级成员的关系。结果:发现了7类与end相关的内容暴露:1)来自朋友的模因(11.5%);2)来自卫生运动的新闻和信息(7.6%);3)只开展公共卫生运动(23.2%);4)公共卫生信息与模因(27.5%);5)名人/网红帖子(15.6%);6)混合主题品牌贴(3.5%);7)多维频繁暴露(11.1%)。年轻人(12-17岁)、女性和少数种族/民族参与者更有可能接触到以多种内容为特征的课程,频率更高。过去一年的ENDS使用仅与来自朋友的模因中的班级成员关系相关,仅与公共卫生运动相关。结论:AYA对ends相关社交媒体内容的暴露并不统一,可能不是由烟草/尼古丁使用驱动的。以前可燃烟草/尼古丁营销的目标社会人口群体更有可能在网上接触到无数与ends相关的内容。含义:社交媒体上与ends相关的内容并不统一,其曝光率因来源、主题和频率而有很大差异。一些接触模式是由公共卫生信息驱动的,而另一些则集中在娱乐和宣传内容上。联邦机构和社交媒体平台应该加强和执行与终端相关的在线内容监管,以遏制那些不被法律允许购买或使用终端的人的宣传内容。此外,未来的研究应该检查某些与ends相关的内容暴露是否与烟草/尼古丁使用的开始和升级有关,特别是在可能接收这些内容的社会人口统计学群体中。
{"title":"Patterns of ENDS-Related Content Exposure on Social Media among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults.","authors":"Jessica M Mongilio, Luisa Kcomt, Stephanie T Lanza, Emily Pasman, Jenny Clift, Rebecca J Evans-Polce","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf259","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many U.S. adolescents and young adults (AYA) are exposed to electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)-related content regularly through social media platforms. Prior research treats exposure to ENDS-related content as uniform, both in its source and theme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined the variation in frequency, source, and theme of ENDS-related content online among AYA (ages 12-25), using the nationally representative Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 7 (2022/23) data. Latent class analysis was used to identify patterns of ENDS-related content exposure among AYA who reported viewing ENDS-related content on social media in the past week (N=4,031). Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations of sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco/nicotine use behaviors with class membership.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven classes of ENDS-related content exposure were identified: 1) Memes from Friends (11.5%); 2) News & Information from Health Campaigns (7.6%); 3) Public Health Campaigns Only (23.2%); 4) Public Health Information & Memes (27.5%); 5) Celebrity/Influencer Posts (15.6%); 6) Mixed-Theme Brand Posts (3.5%); and 7) Multidimensional Frequent Exposure (11.1%). Young (ages 12-17), female, and racial/ethnic minority participants were more likely to be exposed to classes characterized by multiple types of content at higher frequencies. Past-year ENDS use was only associated with class membership in Memes from Friends relative to Public Health Campaigns Only.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AYA exposure to ENDS-related social media content is not uniform and may not be driven by tobacco/nicotine use. Sociodemographic groups previously targeted by combustible tobacco/nicotine marketing are more likely to be exposed to myriad ENDS-related content online.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>ENDS-related content on social media is not uniform, and exposure varies considerably by source, theme, and frequency. Some exposure patterns were driven by public health information, while others were centered on entertainment and promotional content. Regulation of ENDS-related content online should be bolstered and enforced by federal institutions and social media platforms to curb promotional content for those not legally allowed to purchase or use ENDS. Additionally, future research should examine whether certain ENDS-related content exposure is associated with the tobacco/nicotine use initiation and escalation, particularly among sociodemographic groups that may be targeted to receive this content.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12908594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Engagement with Stop Smoking Services among Lower Socioeconomic Groups across the UK: a Qualitative Study using the Behaviour Change Wheel. 在英国社会经济地位较低的群体中加强对戒烟服务的参与:一项使用行为改变轮的定性研究。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf256
Pamela Smith, Lucia Dahlby, Evgeniya Plotnikova, Rebecca-Bell Williams, Rebecca Thorley, Rachael Murray, Fiona Dobbie, Tessa Langley, Ilze Bogdanovica, Kate Brain, Leah Jayes

Introduction: Individuals who use a stop smoking service (SSS) in the UK are three times more likely to quit. Uptake of SSS is limited among lower socioeconomic (LSE) groups and efforts are needed to understand how to improve the appeal, acceptability and accessibility of SSS.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 114 participants from the four UK devolved nations who had a current or recent smoking history, and who had previously accessed or may potentially access a SSS. Participants were recruited via Facebook, third sector organisations and a market research company. Telephone-based interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The Behaviour Change Wheel was used to develop the interview topic guide, inform thematic analysis and identify strategies to increase engagement with SSS.

Results: Barriers included low awareness and understanding regarding the availability and content of SSS, a lack of free time to access SSS and negative beliefs regarding the efficacy of SSS support. Facilitators included more frequent and continued flexible support delivered using a range of modes, access to free NRT and rapport with the advisor. Intervention functions were identified to address these barriers and facilitators via educational efforts to raise awareness of SSS, environmental restructuring to provide a flexible approach to delivery, and community champions to encourage and enable SSS engagement in the target population.

Conclusions: Providing further community-based efforts along with a more holistic approach to delivering behavioural support and NRT has strong potential to maximise SSS reach, engagement and acceptability.

Implications: The current study provides insights into the barriers and facilitators to engaging with and accessing SSS amongst LSE groups and indicates that interventions to increase capability, motivation and opportunity are required. Recommendations from this work for tailoring UK SSS for LSE groups can be used to inform future tobacco control policy including engagement strategies at a local and national level.

简介:在英国,使用戒烟服务(SSS)的人戒烟的可能性是其他人的三倍。社会经济地位较低(LSE)群体对SSS的接受程度有限,需要努力了解如何提高SSS的吸引力、可接受性和可及性。方法:对114名参与者进行半结构化访谈,这些参与者来自英国四个地方政府,他们目前或最近有吸烟史,以前曾使用或可能使用SSS。参与者是通过Facebook、第三部门组织和一家市场研究公司招募的。以电话为基础的访谈采用专题分析进行分析。行为改变轮被用来制定采访主题指南,为专题分析提供信息,并确定增加社会保障服务参与的策略。结果:障碍包括对SSS的可用性和内容的认识和理解不足,缺乏自由时间使用SSS,以及对SSS支持效果的消极信念。促进因素包括使用一系列模式提供更频繁和持续的灵活支持,获得免费的NRT以及与顾问的融洽关系。确定了干预功能,通过教育工作来提高对可持续社会保障的认识,通过环境调整来提供灵活的实施方法,以及通过社区倡导者来鼓励和促进目标人群参与可持续社会保障,从而解决这些障碍和促进因素。结论:提供进一步的以社区为基础的努力,以及更全面的方法来提供行为支持和NRT,具有最大限度地提高SSS覆盖面、参与度和可接受性的强大潜力。启示:本研究提供了对LSE群体参与和获得SSS的障碍和促进因素的见解,并表明需要采取干预措施来提高能力、动机和机会。这项工作提出的针对LSE群体量身定制英国SSS的建议可用于为未来的烟草控制政策提供信息,包括地方和国家层面的参与战略。
{"title":"Enhancing Engagement with Stop Smoking Services among Lower Socioeconomic Groups across the UK: a Qualitative Study using the Behaviour Change Wheel.","authors":"Pamela Smith, Lucia Dahlby, Evgeniya Plotnikova, Rebecca-Bell Williams, Rebecca Thorley, Rachael Murray, Fiona Dobbie, Tessa Langley, Ilze Bogdanovica, Kate Brain, Leah Jayes","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals who use a stop smoking service (SSS) in the UK are three times more likely to quit. Uptake of SSS is limited among lower socioeconomic (LSE) groups and efforts are needed to understand how to improve the appeal, acceptability and accessibility of SSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with 114 participants from the four UK devolved nations who had a current or recent smoking history, and who had previously accessed or may potentially access a SSS. Participants were recruited via Facebook, third sector organisations and a market research company. Telephone-based interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The Behaviour Change Wheel was used to develop the interview topic guide, inform thematic analysis and identify strategies to increase engagement with SSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers included low awareness and understanding regarding the availability and content of SSS, a lack of free time to access SSS and negative beliefs regarding the efficacy of SSS support. Facilitators included more frequent and continued flexible support delivered using a range of modes, access to free NRT and rapport with the advisor. Intervention functions were identified to address these barriers and facilitators via educational efforts to raise awareness of SSS, environmental restructuring to provide a flexible approach to delivery, and community champions to encourage and enable SSS engagement in the target population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing further community-based efforts along with a more holistic approach to delivering behavioural support and NRT has strong potential to maximise SSS reach, engagement and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The current study provides insights into the barriers and facilitators to engaging with and accessing SSS amongst LSE groups and indicates that interventions to increase capability, motivation and opportunity are required. Recommendations from this work for tailoring UK SSS for LSE groups can be used to inform future tobacco control policy including engagement strategies at a local and national level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Key Predictors of Smoking Cessation Success: Text-Based Feature Selection Using a Large Language Model. 确定戒烟成功的关键预测因素:使用大型语言模型的基于文本的特征选择。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf257
Thuy T T Le, Jiongxuan Yang, Zimo Zhao, Kaidi Zhang, Wenjun Li, Yan Hu

Introduction: The most effective way to reduce mortality and morbidity among current smokers is to quit smoking. Although about half of smokers attempted to quit, only one-tenth succeeded in 2022. Understanding key predictors of smoking cessation success would inform smoking cessation interventions and increase quitting rates.

Methods: We analyzed data from waves 5 and 6 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (December 2018 to November 2021). Using OpenAI's GPT-4.1, we identified the top 45 variables from wave 5 that are highly predictive of 12-month smoking abstinence in wave 6, based on descriptions of survey variables. We then validated the predictive power of the GPT-4.1-selected variables by comparing the performance of eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) trained on different sets of variables. Finally, we derived insights into the top 10 variables, ranked according to their SHapley Additive exPlanations values.

Results: The performance of XGBoost trained with all possible wave 5 variables and the 45 selected variables was almost identical (AUC:0.749 vs AUC:0.752). The top 10 variables included past 30-day smoking frequency, minutes from waking up to smoking first cigarette, important people's views on tobacco use, prevalence of tobacco use among close associates, daily electronic nicotine product use, emotional dependence, and health harm concerns.

Conclusions: The high predictive performance of XGBoost, when trained on the selected variables, underscores the efficiency and efficacy of GPT-4.1-based feature selection. The top 10 variables include various risk factors that have been previously reported in the literature for their influence on smoking behavior.

Implications: Our findings do not establish causal relationships between the selected predictors and 12-month smoking abstinence. However, identifying these key predictors provides valuable insights into the factors highly associated with smoking cessation success. This study demonstrates the ability of OpenAI's GPT-4.1 to perform feature selection using only the textual descriptions of variables. The efficient and successful application of GPT-4.1 for variable selection highlights the potential of integrating artificial intelligence tools into tobacco research to guide resource-efficient and targeted intervention strategies.

引言:降低当前吸烟者死亡率和发病率的最有效方法是戒烟。尽管约有一半的吸烟者试图戒烟,但在2022年只有十分之一的人成功戒烟。了解戒烟成功的关键预测因素将为戒烟干预提供信息,并提高戒烟率。方法:我们分析了烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究(2018年12月至2021年11月)第5和第6波的数据。使用OpenAI的GPT-4.1,我们根据调查变量的描述,确定了第5波中高度预测第6波中12个月戒烟情况的前45个变量。然后,我们通过比较极端梯度增强(XGBoost)在不同变量集上训练的性能,验证了gpt -4.1选择变量的预测能力。最后,我们根据SHapley Additive exPlanations值对前10个变量进行了排序。结果:XGBoost在所有可能的波5变量和45个选定变量的训练下的性能几乎相同(AUC:0.749 vs 0.752)。最重要的10个变量包括过去30天的吸烟频率、起床到吸第一支烟的时间、重要人物对烟草使用的看法、亲密伙伴中吸烟的流行程度、每日电子尼古丁产品的使用、情感依赖和健康危害担忧。结论:在对所选变量进行训练时,XGBoost的高预测性能强调了基于gpt -4.1的特征选择的效率和有效性。前10个变量包括先前文献中报道的影响吸烟行为的各种风险因素。含义:我们的研究结果没有建立所选预测因子与12个月戒烟之间的因果关系。然而,确定这些关键的预测因素为了解与戒烟成功高度相关的因素提供了有价值的见解。本研究展示了OpenAI的GPT-4.1仅使用变量的文本描述来执行特征选择的能力。GPT-4.1在变量选择方面的高效和成功应用凸显了将人工智能工具整合到烟草研究中,以指导资源高效和有针对性的干预策略的潜力。
{"title":"Identifying Key Predictors of Smoking Cessation Success: Text-Based Feature Selection Using a Large Language Model.","authors":"Thuy T T Le, Jiongxuan Yang, Zimo Zhao, Kaidi Zhang, Wenjun Li, Yan Hu","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf257","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The most effective way to reduce mortality and morbidity among current smokers is to quit smoking. Although about half of smokers attempted to quit, only one-tenth succeeded in 2022. Understanding key predictors of smoking cessation success would inform smoking cessation interventions and increase quitting rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from waves 5 and 6 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (December 2018 to November 2021). Using OpenAI's GPT-4.1, we identified the top 45 variables from wave 5 that are highly predictive of 12-month smoking abstinence in wave 6, based on descriptions of survey variables. We then validated the predictive power of the GPT-4.1-selected variables by comparing the performance of eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) trained on different sets of variables. Finally, we derived insights into the top 10 variables, ranked according to their SHapley Additive exPlanations values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of XGBoost trained with all possible wave 5 variables and the 45 selected variables was almost identical (AUC:0.749 vs AUC:0.752). The top 10 variables included past 30-day smoking frequency, minutes from waking up to smoking first cigarette, important people's views on tobacco use, prevalence of tobacco use among close associates, daily electronic nicotine product use, emotional dependence, and health harm concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high predictive performance of XGBoost, when trained on the selected variables, underscores the efficiency and efficacy of GPT-4.1-based feature selection. The top 10 variables include various risk factors that have been previously reported in the literature for their influence on smoking behavior.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Our findings do not establish causal relationships between the selected predictors and 12-month smoking abstinence. However, identifying these key predictors provides valuable insights into the factors highly associated with smoking cessation success. This study demonstrates the ability of OpenAI's GPT-4.1 to perform feature selection using only the textual descriptions of variables. The efficient and successful application of GPT-4.1 for variable selection highlights the potential of integrating artificial intelligence tools into tobacco research to guide resource-efficient and targeted intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12747148/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145794479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Squeezing Tobacco Retail density between 2000 and 2020 an analysis of an Australian Tobacco Sellers Register. 2000年至2020年间挤压烟草零售密度——对澳大利亚烟草销售商登记册的分析。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf255
Veronica A Martin-Gall, Amanda Neil, Kate Chappell, Kate Macintyre, Seana Gall

Introduction: Research indicates that high tobacco retail density is associated with smoking in children, adults and during pregnancy. Despite this, there is limited research on retail suppression policies, or how government regulation affects tobacco outlet density over time. We examine the association between government-imposed tobacco control laws and outlet density between 2000 and 2019.

Methods: Records of outlets were obtained from the mandated tobacco licensing scheme and register in one state of Australia, Tasmania. Trends in density i.e. retailers per 1000 people, were analysed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Trends by retailer type were analysed between 2010 and 2019.

Results: The highest retailer density was observed in 2002 and lowest in 2019 (from 3.2 to 1.2 retailers per 1000 people), with a mean annual percentage change (APC) of -5.1% of retailer density (CI -5.9% to -4.3%, p>0.01). A decrease in APC 7.9% density per year (CI -9.7% to -6.0%, p<0.01) was observed between 2009 - 2013, corresponded with changes in tobacco packaging laws and import taxes. An APC decrease of 8.9% density per year (CI -10.7% to -7.1%, p<0.01) between 2016 and 2019 corresponded with a tripling in government licensing fees. Liquor licensed premises, newsagencies, food and mixed businesses were all affected, (-7.8%, -19.8%, -10.2%, -9.9% APC respectively.) with little change observed supermarkets, tobacconists and wholesalers from 2010 to 2019.

Conclusions: Tobacco tax, advertising bans, packaging laws and increased licence fees were all associated with reduced tobacco outlet density. Supermarkets and tobacconists - large volume retailers - were minimally affected by these levers and may require direct regulation. Further research is underway to determine whether changes in tobacco retail density are associated with reduced smoking.

Implications:

研究表明,烟草零售密度高与儿童、成人和怀孕期间吸烟有关。尽管如此,关于零售抑制政策或政府监管如何随时间影响烟草出口密度的研究有限。我们研究了2000年至2019年间政府实施的烟草控制法律与出口密度之间的关系。方法:从澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州的强制烟草许可计划和登记处获得销售点记录。密度趋势,即每1000人的零售商,使用Joinpoint回归分析进行分析。分析了2010年至2019年零售商类型的趋势。结果:2002年零售商密度最高,2019年最低(从每1000人3.2家到1.2家),零售商密度的年平均百分比变化(APC)为-5.1% (CI -5.9%至-4.3%,p < 0.01)。APC密度每年下降7.9% (CI -9.7%至-6.0%)。结论:烟草税、广告禁令、包装法和许可证费用增加都与烟草出口密度下降有关。超市和烟草商——大型零售商——受这些杠杆的影响最小,可能需要直接监管。进一步的研究正在进行中,以确定烟草零售密度的变化是否与吸烟减少有关。含义:
{"title":"Squeezing Tobacco Retail density between 2000 and 2020 an analysis of an Australian Tobacco Sellers Register.","authors":"Veronica A Martin-Gall, Amanda Neil, Kate Chappell, Kate Macintyre, Seana Gall","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Research indicates that high tobacco retail density is associated with smoking in children, adults and during pregnancy. Despite this, there is limited research on retail suppression policies, or how government regulation affects tobacco outlet density over time. We examine the association between government-imposed tobacco control laws and outlet density between 2000 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of outlets were obtained from the mandated tobacco licensing scheme and register in one state of Australia, Tasmania. Trends in density i.e. retailers per 1000 people, were analysed using Joinpoint regression analysis. Trends by retailer type were analysed between 2010 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest retailer density was observed in 2002 and lowest in 2019 (from 3.2 to 1.2 retailers per 1000 people), with a mean annual percentage change (APC) of -5.1% of retailer density (CI -5.9% to -4.3%, p>0.01). A decrease in APC 7.9% density per year (CI -9.7% to -6.0%, p<0.01) was observed between 2009 - 2013, corresponded with changes in tobacco packaging laws and import taxes. An APC decrease of 8.9% density per year (CI -10.7% to -7.1%, p<0.01) between 2016 and 2019 corresponded with a tripling in government licensing fees. Liquor licensed premises, newsagencies, food and mixed businesses were all affected, (-7.8%, -19.8%, -10.2%, -9.9% APC respectively.) with little change observed supermarkets, tobacconists and wholesalers from 2010 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tobacco tax, advertising bans, packaging laws and increased licence fees were all associated with reduced tobacco outlet density. Supermarkets and tobacconists - large volume retailers - were minimally affected by these levers and may require direct regulation. Further research is underway to determine whether changes in tobacco retail density are associated with reduced smoking.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Survey Item Wording and Response Options on Prevalence of Beliefs About Nicotine Causing Cancer: A Randomized Survey Experiment. 调查项目措辞和回答选项对尼古丁致癌信念流行程度的影响:一项随机调查实验。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf215
Andrea C Villanti, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Marisa Tomaino, Caitlin Uriarte, Caitlin Weiger, Olivia A Wackowski, Cristine D Delnevo, Emily B Peterson

Introduction: Misperceptions of nicotine's role in health harms among US adults have increased. This study examined how survey item wording affects estimates of the misperception that nicotine itself causes cancer.

Methods: Two thousand five hundred twenty-six US adults aged 18-45 completed a randomized split-sample experiment through Cloud Research in August 2022. After receiving one of 10 existing and novel survey items about the role of nicotine in causing cancer, participants completed an open-ended question explaining their response. Analyses examined prevalence of beliefs by study condition and open-ended responses.

Results: Overall, 36% of participants believed that nicotine does not cause cancer (coded as "correct"), but this varied by condition (10%-81%). Prevalence of this belief was similar when using magnitude-of-harm items from existing national surveys (HINTS, PATH; 44%) but lower with more direct wording (ie, "nicotine is a cause of cancer"; 23%). Changing response options (including/excluding don't know; true/false versus Likert scale) did not alter prevalence of a correct belief. Open-ended responses were distributed across four themes: (1) EXPOSURE to other chemicals or smoke cause cancer, not nicotine (n = 598, 23.7%), (2) Nicotine on its own DIRECTLY causes cancer (n = 705, 28.0%), (3) Nicotine only causes cancer by keeping people ADDICTED to tobacco (n = 796, 31.6%), and (4) Other (n = 419, 16.6%); study condition was associated with theme (p < .001).

Conclusions: Question wording influences the prevalence of agreement that nicotine itself causes cancer. Including "don't know," "probably yes," and "probably not" options may identify a broader group of people who could benefit from nicotine education.

Implications: Ensuring accuracy in estimating misperceptions about nicotine has implications for tobacco control in two important ways: first, these measures may identify the people or groups whose misperceptions may put them at greater risk for tobacco-related disease and death, and second, the prevalence of nicotine misperceptions and people affected may determine the prioritization and tailoring of interventions aimed at correcting misperceptions.

美国成年人对尼古丁在健康危害中的作用的误解有所增加。这项研究考察了调查项目的措辞如何影响尼古丁本身导致癌症的误解的估计。方法:2226名18-45岁的美国成年人于2022年8月通过Cloud Research完成了随机分样本实验。在收到关于尼古丁致癌作用的10个现有和新调查项目中的一个后,参与者完成了一个开放式问题来解释他们的回答。分析通过研究条件和开放式回答检查了信仰的流行程度。结果:总体而言,36%的参与者认为尼古丁不会导致癌症(编码为“正确”),但这因情况而异(10%-81%)。当使用现有国家调查中的危害程度项目(提示,PATH; 44%)时,这种信念的流行率相似,但使用更直接的措辞(例如,“尼古丁是癌症的原因”;23%)时,这种信念的流行率较低。改变回答选项(包括/排除不知道;对李克特量表的真/假)并没有改变正确信念的流行程度。开放式回答分布在四个主题中:(1)暴露于其他化学物质或烟雾中导致癌症,而不是尼古丁(n = 598, 23.7%),(2)尼古丁本身直接导致癌症(n = 705, 28.0%),(3)尼古丁仅通过使人们对烟草上瘾而导致癌症(n = 796, 31.6%),(4)其他(n = 419, 16.6%);结论:问题措辞影响尼古丁本身致癌的认同程度。包括“不知道”、“可能知道”和“可能不知道”选项可以确定更广泛的人群,他们可以从尼古丁教育中受益。影响:确保准确估计对尼古丁的误解对烟草控制有两个重要的影响:首先,这些措施可以确定误解可能使他们面临与烟草有关的疾病和死亡的更大风险的人或群体,其次,尼古丁误解的普遍程度和受影响的人可以确定旨在纠正误解的干预措施的优先次序和剪裁。
{"title":"Impact of Survey Item Wording and Response Options on Prevalence of Beliefs About Nicotine Causing Cancer: A Randomized Survey Experiment.","authors":"Andrea C Villanti, Michelle T Bover Manderski, Marisa Tomaino, Caitlin Uriarte, Caitlin Weiger, Olivia A Wackowski, Cristine D Delnevo, Emily B Peterson","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf215","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Misperceptions of nicotine's role in health harms among US adults have increased. This study examined how survey item wording affects estimates of the misperception that nicotine itself causes cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two thousand five hundred twenty-six US adults aged 18-45 completed a randomized split-sample experiment through Cloud Research in August 2022. After receiving one of 10 existing and novel survey items about the role of nicotine in causing cancer, participants completed an open-ended question explaining their response. Analyses examined prevalence of beliefs by study condition and open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 36% of participants believed that nicotine does not cause cancer (coded as \"correct\"), but this varied by condition (10%-81%). Prevalence of this belief was similar when using magnitude-of-harm items from existing national surveys (HINTS, PATH; 44%) but lower with more direct wording (ie, \"nicotine is a cause of cancer\"; 23%). Changing response options (including/excluding don't know; true/false versus Likert scale) did not alter prevalence of a correct belief. Open-ended responses were distributed across four themes: (1) EXPOSURE to other chemicals or smoke cause cancer, not nicotine (n = 598, 23.7%), (2) Nicotine on its own DIRECTLY causes cancer (n = 705, 28.0%), (3) Nicotine only causes cancer by keeping people ADDICTED to tobacco (n = 796, 31.6%), and (4) Other (n = 419, 16.6%); study condition was associated with theme (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Question wording influences the prevalence of agreement that nicotine itself causes cancer. Including \"don't know,\" \"probably yes,\" and \"probably not\" options may identify a broader group of people who could benefit from nicotine education.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Ensuring accuracy in estimating misperceptions about nicotine has implications for tobacco control in two important ways: first, these measures may identify the people or groups whose misperceptions may put them at greater risk for tobacco-related disease and death, and second, the prevalence of nicotine misperceptions and people affected may determine the prioritization and tailoring of interventions aimed at correcting misperceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145775164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Health and Economic Impacts of Increased Alcohol and Tobacco Taxation on Cameroonian Households: A Microsimulation Analysis. 增加烟酒税对喀麦隆家庭的健康和经济影响:微观模拟分析。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf254
Paul Tadzong Mouafo, Armand Mboutchouang Kountchou, Tsafack Nanfosso Roger

Introduction: This paper examines the health and welfare benefits of increasing alcohol and tobacco taxes in Cameroon.

Methods: The study employs two microsimulation techniques: an economic simulation of consumption shifts in response to tax changes and an epidemiological study of morbidity and mortality linked to consumption reductions. Data is sourced from the 2014 Cameroon Household Survey (ECAM4) and other secondary sources.

Results: We find that Cameroon's fiscal policy of increasing excise duties by 30% has positive effects on households by improving health and welfare. With a 95% internal uncertainty (UI) between 618 165 and 1 163 340, the implementation of this medium scenario for alcoholic drinks, mainly beer, would lead to a gain of 852 095 life years. This effect is even more significant for tobacco products, as the same tax rate would lead to a gain of 1 288 384 life years, with a 95% UI ranging from 720 282 to 1 965 493. Tax policy effects are larger for tobacco than for alcohol because tobacco has a higher price elasticity than alcohol. Nevertheless, the effects remain gender and spatially sensitive throughout the country.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the positive impacts of increased alcohol and tobacco taxes on public health and welfare in Cameroon. Complementary policies, such as consumer education and customs controls, are essential to maximize benefits and address policy challenges.

引言:本文考察了喀麦隆增加酒精和烟草税的健康和福利效益。方法:该研究采用了两种微观模拟技术:一种是针对税收变化的消费变化的经济模拟,另一种是与消费减少有关的发病率和死亡率的流行病学研究。数据来自2014年喀麦隆住户调查(ECAM4)和其他二手来源。结果:我们发现喀麦隆将消费税提高30%的财政政策通过改善健康和福利对家庭产生了积极影响。在95%的内部不确定度(UI)介于618 165和1 163 340之间的情况下,对酒精饮料(主要是啤酒)实施这一中等情景,将使寿命年增加852 095年。这种影响对烟草产品更为显著,因为相同的税率将导致1 288 384生命年的增加,95%的UI范围为720 282至1 965 493。税收政策对烟草的影响大于对酒精的影响,因为烟草比酒精具有更高的价格弹性。然而,这种影响在全国各地仍然具有性别和空间敏感性。结论:研究结果强调了增加烟酒税对喀麦隆公众健康和福利的积极影响。消费者教育和海关管制等配套政策对于实现利益最大化和应对政策挑战至关重要。
{"title":"The Health and Economic Impacts of Increased Alcohol and Tobacco Taxation on Cameroonian Households: A Microsimulation Analysis.","authors":"Paul Tadzong Mouafo, Armand Mboutchouang Kountchou, Tsafack Nanfosso Roger","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper examines the health and welfare benefits of increasing alcohol and tobacco taxes in Cameroon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study employs two microsimulation techniques: an economic simulation of consumption shifts in response to tax changes and an epidemiological study of morbidity and mortality linked to consumption reductions. Data is sourced from the 2014 Cameroon Household Survey (ECAM4) and other secondary sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We find that Cameroon's fiscal policy of increasing excise duties by 30% has positive effects on households by improving health and welfare. With a 95% internal uncertainty (UI) between 618 165 and 1 163 340, the implementation of this medium scenario for alcoholic drinks, mainly beer, would lead to a gain of 852 095 life years. This effect is even more significant for tobacco products, as the same tax rate would lead to a gain of 1 288 384 life years, with a 95% UI ranging from 720 282 to 1 965 493. Tax policy effects are larger for tobacco than for alcohol because tobacco has a higher price elasticity than alcohol. Nevertheless, the effects remain gender and spatially sensitive throughout the country.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the positive impacts of increased alcohol and tobacco taxes on public health and welfare in Cameroon. Complementary policies, such as consumer education and customs controls, are essential to maximize benefits and address policy challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145756714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protective Role of CBD Against Nicotine Pouch-Induced Seizure Aggravation and Alterations in Brain Glymphatic Biomarkers. CBD对尼古丁袋致癫痫加重的保护作用及脑淋巴生物标志物的改变。
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf253
Bidhan Bhandari, Sahar Emami Naeini, Hannah M Rogers, Abdullah Hassan Alhashim, Jack C Yu, Mohammad Seyyedi, Nancy Young, Ahmed El-Marakby, Évila Lopes Salles, Lei P Wang, Babak Baban

Introduction: Nicotine pouches are rapidly increasing in popularity, yet their long-term neurological consequences remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence suggests nicotine may influence seizure susceptibility and neuroimmune signaling, while cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigated the time-dependent impact of acute versus chronic oral nicotine exposure on seizure vulnerability, neuroinflammation, and glymphatic function, and evaluated whether inhaled CBD can reverse these pathological changes.

Methods: Mice were exposed to acute or 7-day chronic nicotine pouch prior to kainic acid-induced seizures. Seizure severity was scored using the Racine scale. Neuroinflammatory markers (IL-6, HMGB1), neuronal activation markers (BDNF, c-FOS), and AQP4 expression were quantified via flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Western blotting. Glymphatic function was assessed using cisterna magna injection of rhodamine dextran tracers. An ex vivo IL-6 modulation assay evaluated nicotine-induced cytokine production and CBD-mediated suppression, with or without IL-6 receptor blockade.

Results: Acute nicotine transiently reduced seizure severity, whereas chronic exposure significantly exacerbated seizures, elevated IL-6, HMGB1, BDNF, and c-FOS, and markedly downregulated AQP4. CSF tracer studies confirmed impaired glymphatic influx following chronic nicotine exposure. CBD inhalation effectively reversed seizure severity restored AQP4 expression, normalized IL-6 and HMGB1 levels, and reduced c-FOS protein expression. The IL-6R blockade assay showed that nicotine induces IL-6 production in brain-derived immune cells, while CBD suppresses this response upstream of IL-6 signaling.

Conclusions: Chronic nicotine pouch exposure promotes seizure susceptibility through converging neuroimmune and glymphatic disruptions. Inhaled CBD counteracts these effects, supporting its potential as a targeted therapeutic strategy for nicotine-associated neurological risk.

简介:尼古丁袋正在迅速普及,但其长期的神经系统后果仍然知之甚少。新出现的证据表明,尼古丁可能影响癫痫易感性和神经免疫信号,而大麻二酚(CBD)已显示出神经保护和抗炎作用。本研究调查了急性和慢性口服尼古丁暴露对癫痫易感性、神经炎症和淋巴功能的时间依赖性影响,并评估吸入CBD是否可以逆转这些病理改变。方法:小鼠在卡因酸诱发癫痫发作前暴露于急性或7天慢性尼古丁袋。癫痫发作严重程度采用拉辛量表评分。通过流式细胞术、免疫荧光和Western blotting定量检测神经炎症标志物(IL-6、HMGB1)、神经元激活标志物(BDNF、c-FOS)和AQP4的表达。用大池注射罗丹明葡聚糖示踪剂评估淋巴功能。体外IL-6调节实验评估了尼古丁诱导的细胞因子产生和cbd介导的抑制,有或没有IL-6受体阻断。结果:急性尼古丁可短暂降低癫痫发作的严重程度,而慢性尼古丁暴露可显著加重癫痫发作,升高IL-6、HMGB1、BDNF和c-FOS,并显著下调AQP4。脑脊液示踪研究证实慢性尼古丁暴露后淋巴内流受损。吸入CBD可有效逆转癫痫发作严重程度,恢复AQP4表达,使IL-6和HMGB1水平正常化,并降低c-FOS蛋白表达。IL-6R阻断实验表明,尼古丁诱导脑源性免疫细胞产生IL-6,而CBD抑制IL-6信号上游的反应。结论:慢性尼古丁袋暴露可通过神经免疫和淋巴系统的聚集性破坏促进癫痫易感性。吸入CBD抵消了这些影响,支持其作为尼古丁相关神经风险的靶向治疗策略的潜力。
{"title":"Protective Role of CBD Against Nicotine Pouch-Induced Seizure Aggravation and Alterations in Brain Glymphatic Biomarkers.","authors":"Bidhan Bhandari, Sahar Emami Naeini, Hannah M Rogers, Abdullah Hassan Alhashim, Jack C Yu, Mohammad Seyyedi, Nancy Young, Ahmed El-Marakby, Évila Lopes Salles, Lei P Wang, Babak Baban","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Nicotine pouches are rapidly increasing in popularity, yet their long-term neurological consequences remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence suggests nicotine may influence seizure susceptibility and neuroimmune signaling, while cannabidiol (CBD) has demonstrated neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. This study investigated the time-dependent impact of acute versus chronic oral nicotine exposure on seizure vulnerability, neuroinflammation, and glymphatic function, and evaluated whether inhaled CBD can reverse these pathological changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mice were exposed to acute or 7-day chronic nicotine pouch prior to kainic acid-induced seizures. Seizure severity was scored using the Racine scale. Neuroinflammatory markers (IL-6, HMGB1), neuronal activation markers (BDNF, c-FOS), and AQP4 expression were quantified via flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, and Western blotting. Glymphatic function was assessed using cisterna magna injection of rhodamine dextran tracers. An ex vivo IL-6 modulation assay evaluated nicotine-induced cytokine production and CBD-mediated suppression, with or without IL-6 receptor blockade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute nicotine transiently reduced seizure severity, whereas chronic exposure significantly exacerbated seizures, elevated IL-6, HMGB1, BDNF, and c-FOS, and markedly downregulated AQP4. CSF tracer studies confirmed impaired glymphatic influx following chronic nicotine exposure. CBD inhalation effectively reversed seizure severity restored AQP4 expression, normalized IL-6 and HMGB1 levels, and reduced c-FOS protein expression. The IL-6R blockade assay showed that nicotine induces IL-6 production in brain-derived immune cells, while CBD suppresses this response upstream of IL-6 signaling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic nicotine pouch exposure promotes seizure susceptibility through converging neuroimmune and glymphatic disruptions. Inhaled CBD counteracts these effects, supporting its potential as a targeted therapeutic strategy for nicotine-associated neurological risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145742773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1