Neurospine最新文献

Objective: Lumbar discectomy is one of the most frequently undertaken procedures for the management of lumbar disc herniation. However, it may be complicated by recurrent disc herniation, with reported rates as high as 25%. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the largest systematic review to date, analyzing the clinical and radiographic risk factors for recurrent disc herniation.

Methods: A systematic literature search of Embase and PubMed/Medline, covering the period from inception to October 1, 2025, was conducted to identify case-control or cohort studies reporting risk factors for recurrent disc herniation. Risk factors were classified into baseline, clinical, and radiographic risk factors. Meta-analysis was performed for any reported risk factor with data from 3 or more studies. The assessment included an evaluation of publication bias and heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 51 studies published during the search timeframe, comprising 52,479 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Recurrent disc herniation occurred in 6,794 patients (12.9%). Significant risk factors for disc herniation included high body mass index (BMI) (standard mean difference [SMD], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.70), diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.23-1.77), increased sagittal range of motion (SMD, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.35-3.94), and Modic changes (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.20-4.01). No other significant predictors for recurrent disc herniation were identified.

Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with high BMI, diabetics, increased sagittal range of motion, and presence of Modic changes are at increased risk of recurrent disc herniation. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the risk factors identified in this study associated with recurrent disc herniation.

Biomarkers are becoming pivotal in understanding the complex pathophysiology of disc herniation and guiding novel therapeutic strategies. Recent research highlights the value of molecular and cellular biomarkers in delineating disease progression, treatment monitoring and patient stratification. This review summarizes current advances in the identification and validation of emerging biomarkers across genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic domains, emphasizing their potential to bridge basic mechanistic insights with clinical translation. Particular attention is given to the interplay between inflammatory mediators, extracellular matrix turnover, and immune cell activity as indicators of lumbar disc herniation diagnosis and prognosis. Despite encouraging progress, standardization of biomarker validation protocols, inter-study comparability, and large-scale clinical implementation remain major challenges. Future directions include the integration of multi-omics technologies and bioinformatic tools to identify predictive biomarker panels with diagnostic and prognostic utility towards personalized medicine.

Objective: Bracing after lumbar discectomy surgery (LDS) is a controversial topic with paucity of related scientific literature. Previous surveys on spine surgeons' preferences were limited both in geographical coverage and number of respondents. The aim of this study is to fill this gap in the literature.

Methods: An international online survey among AO Spine members regarding the postoperative recommendations for bracing (PoBr), activity restriction (AR), and associated factors, was performed.

Results: A total of 703 spine surgeons participated in the survey of which 34% recommended PoBr, with half of them reported usage for 4 weeks. Main influencing variables were being from Europe/South Africa region, greater extent of bony decompression, and larger amount of excised disc material. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents recommended postoperative AR. Prolonged standing, prolonged sitting, and driving were usually restricted for 2 weeks. Bending, twisting, lifting, and low-intensity physical activities for 3 months, while high-intensity physical activities and direct contact sports for 6 months were restricted.

Conclusion: Despite recent literature insights showing limited evidence of efficacy, 34% and 80% of a large cohort of international surgeons practice bracing and recommend AR after LDS for variable durations. Extensive bony decompression and radical discectomy significantly influenced the decision to brace, similarly endoscopic approaches and radical discectomy influenced the decision to restrict activity. These findings emphasize the persistent evidence-practice gap and the wide variability on the global level. More randomized controlled trials are warranted on this topic to reach an evidence-based recommendation.

Objective: To evaluate long-term bone quality changes within the fusion construct (FC) after 2- to 3-level lumbar fusion using computed tomography (CT)-derived Hounsfield units (HUs).

Methods: Among 520 screened patients, 222 who underwent 2- to 3-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion met the inclusion criteria. HU values were measured on CT scans preoperatively, at 1-year postoperative, and at final follow-up. The percentage change in HU (HU [final-pre]%) was calculated for each vertebral level.

Results: At the final follow-up, the FC demonstrated a significant decline in HU compared to preoperative values (median [10th-90th percentile], 132.0 [86.5-220.4]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 116.0-142.5 vs. 124.5 [71.0- 210.0]; 109.8-135.1; HU (final-pre)%: -11.0 [-62.0 to 48.5]; -19.9 to -6.1; p<0.001). In contrast, HU increased significantly at the uppermost instrumented vertebra (HU (final-pre)%: median [10th-90th percentile], 28.3 [-19.9 to 102.9]; 95% CI, 21.1-36.4; p<0.001), likely reflecting increased mechanical demands. Subgroup analysis revealed a more pronounced decline in HU in patients with longer follow-up durations, particularly in the FC group (p=0.003).

Conclusion: CT-derived HU revealed progressive trabecular bone loss within FC over time after lumbar fusion. In patients with longer postoperative intervals, clinicians should remain aware of the potential weakening of the FC, which has important implications when considering implant removal or planning revision surgery.

Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with intervertebral disc herniation contributing substantially to its burden. Most patients improve with conservative care, often associated with disc resorption. Although increasingly recognized as a major determinant of recovery, the mechanisms underlying resorption remain poorly understood. Herniated disc tissue induces immune cell infiltration and release of cytokines and proteolytic enzymes, yet standard anti-inflammatory treatments may paradoxically impede this process. Outcomes are also influenced by physical therapy, lifestyle, herniation characteristics, and immunological background, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. This review summarizes the current knowledge gap and explores strategies to harness intrinsic healing for personalized management.

Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is a common complication after discectomy, occurring in 2%-25% of patients and contributing to higher reoperation rates, reduced satisfaction, and substantial direct and indirect costs. This review evaluates the economic consequences of RLDH and the relative cost-effectiveness of available management strategies. A systematic search of OVID, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library was performed through August 2025. Peer-reviewed, English-language studies were included if they examined adults (≥18 years) with RLDH and reported economic data. Exclusion criteria were studies limited to primary, cervical, or thoracic herniations; animal or cadaveric models; and abstracts. Extracted variables included study design, sample size, follow-up duration, and cost components. Of 283 records identified, 220 were screened and 35 underwent full-text review. Six studies met inclusion criteria, with 2 added through citation searching. Reported costs varied considerably: repeat discectomy added $6,907 in one analysis, while fusion increased expenses by more than 350%. Across studies, repeat discectomy remained the most cost-efficient option, providing comparable outcomes with reduced perioperative expenditures. Conservative management had the lowest immediate direct costs (≈$2,300) but likely underestimates the overall burden due to unmeasured productivity losses. Annular closure devices demonstrated potential cost savings of $2,000-5,000 over 2-5 years. RLDH imposes a substantial economic burden. Heterogeneity in costing methods remains a major limitation which hinders evidence-based determinations. Greater transparency, methodological standardization, and incorporation of societal perspectives are essential to accurately assess the socioeconomic impact of RLDH.

Objective: Hoarseness can occur after spinal surgery under general anesthesia, which has been assessed through self-report measures based on questionnaires. Given the inherent biases associated with self-report instruments, there is a need for more objective measures to assess hoarseness.

Methods: Single institute, a prospective observational study was planned to include 427 patients after spine surgery. This interim analysis was planned to include 215 patients who met the inclusion criteria. All subjects included in this study submitted a questionnaire of Korean Voice Handicap Index (KVHI)-10. Voice analysis including low or high pitch (Herz), frequency variation rate (jitter), amplitude variation rate (Shimmer), and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR) was performed with a software of Pratt.

Results: This interim report enrolled a total of 215 patients who met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 162 patients (75.5%) were subjected to interim analysis after excluding those with data loss (8 patients), operation cancellation (3 patients), and loss to follow-up (42 patients). The incidence of hoarseness was 35.0% on postoperative day (POD)0 and 5.5% on POD30. In the acoustic parameters analyzed, hertz and jitter were significantly positively correlated with the KVHI-10 scores on POD0, while only the jitter value significantly correlated with POD30. The optimal cutoff values of the acoustic parameter on POD30 from the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.65% in jitter, 4.67% in shimmer, and 16.96 dB in NHR.

Conclusion: This study revealed a correlation between objective acoustic parameters obtained from voice analysis and subjective questionnaire scores for hoarseness.