首页 > 最新文献

Neurospine最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Anabolic Agents and Bisphosphonates in the Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. 同化制剂和双膦酸盐对骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者临床疗效的比较:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347256.628
Ikchan Jeon, Sung Bae Park, Bong Ju Moon, Miyoung Choi, Sung Uk Kuh, Jongtae Kim

Objective: We investigated the clinical efficacy of anabolic agents compared with bisphosphonates (BPs) for the incidence of new osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) and fracture healing of OVF in the patients with OVF via meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for published RCTs till December 2022. The RCTs that recruited participants with osteoporosis at high-/very high-risk of fracture (a history of osteoporotic vertebral or hip fracture) or fresh OVF were included in this study. We assessed the risk of bias on every included RCTs, estimated relative risk (RR) for the incidence of new OVF and fracture healing of OVF, and overall certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed by Cochrane review manager (RevMan) ver. 5.3. Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 and GRADEpro/GDT were applied for evaluating methodological quality and overall certainty of evidence, respectively.

Results: Five hundred eighteen studies were screened, and finally 6 eligible RCTs were included in the analysis. In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents significantly reduced the incidence of new OVF (teriparatide and romosozumab vs. alendronate and risedronate [RR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.71; p < 0.00001; high-certainty of evidence]; teriparatide vs. risedronate [RR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.68; p < 0.0001; high-certainty of evidence]). However, there was no evidence of teriparatide compared to alendronate in fracture healing of OVF (RR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.60; p = 0.12; low-certainty of evidence).

Conclusion: In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents showed a significant superiority for preventing new OVF than BPs, with no significant evidence for promoting fracture healing of OVF. However, considering small number of RCTs in this study, additional studies with large-scale data are required to obtain more robust evidences.

目的通过随机对照试验(RCTs)的荟萃分析,研究同化制剂与双膦酸盐(BPs)相比,对骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVF)患者新发骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVF)发生率和OVF骨折愈合的临床疗效:方法:在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等电子数据库中检索截至2022年12月已发表的RCT。本研究纳入了招募高/极高骨折风险骨质疏松症患者(有骨质疏松性脊椎或髋部骨折病史)或新鲜 OVF 患者的 RCT。我们评估了每项纳入的 RCT 的偏倚风险、新的 OVF 发生率和 OVF 骨折愈合的估计相对风险 (RR),以及证据的总体确定性。荟萃分析由 Cochrane review manager (RevMan) 5.3 版完成。Cochrane偏倚风险2.0和GRADEpro/GDT分别用于评估方法学质量和证据的总体确定性:结果:共筛选出 518 项研究,最终有 6 项符合条件的 RCT 纳入分析。在已发生 OVF 的患者中,合成代谢药物可显著降低新 OVF 的发生率(特立帕肽和罗莫索单抗 vs 阿仑膦酸钠和利塞膦酸钠[RR = 0.57,95% CI 0.45 - 0.71;p < 0.00001;高证据确定性];特立帕肽 vs 利塞膦酸钠[RR = 0.50,95% CI 0.37 - 0.68;p < 0.0001;高证据确定性])。然而,在OVF骨折愈合方面,没有证据表明特立帕肽优于阿仑膦酸钠(RR = 1.23,95% CI 0.95 - 1.60;P = 0.12;证据确定性低):结论:在流行性 OVF 患者中,同化制剂在预防新的 OVF 方面明显优于 BPs,但在促进 OVF 骨折愈合方面无明显证据。然而,考虑到本研究中的 RCT 数量较少,需要进行更多具有大规模数据的研究,以获得更可靠的证据。
{"title":"Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Anabolic Agents and Bisphosphonates in the Patients With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ikchan Jeon, Sung Bae Park, Bong Ju Moon, Miyoung Choi, Sung Uk Kuh, Jongtae Kim","doi":"10.14245/ns.2347256.628","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2347256.628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the clinical efficacy of anabolic agents compared with bisphosphonates (BPs) for the incidence of new osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) and fracture healing of OVF in the patients with OVF via meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for published RCTs till December 2022. The RCTs that recruited participants with osteoporosis at high-/very high-risk of fracture (a history of osteoporotic vertebral or hip fracture) or fresh OVF were included in this study. We assessed the risk of bias on every included RCTs, estimated relative risk (RR) for the incidence of new OVF and fracture healing of OVF, and overall certainty of evidence. Meta-analyses were performed by Cochrane review manager (RevMan) ver. 5.3. Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 and GRADEpro/GDT were applied for evaluating methodological quality and overall certainty of evidence, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred eighteen studies were screened, and finally 6 eligible RCTs were included in the analysis. In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents significantly reduced the incidence of new OVF (teriparatide and romosozumab vs. alendronate and risedronate [RR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.71; p < 0.00001; high-certainty of evidence]; teriparatide vs. risedronate [RR, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.68; p < 0.0001; high-certainty of evidence]). However, there was no evidence of teriparatide compared to alendronate in fracture healing of OVF (RR, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.60; p = 0.12; low-certainty of evidence).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the patients with prevalent OVF, anabolic agents showed a significant superiority for preventing new OVF than BPs, with no significant evidence for promoting fracture healing of OVF. However, considering small number of RCTs in this study, additional studies with large-scale data are required to obtain more robust evidences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224729/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally. 美国和全球腰背痛社会经济负担的比较研究。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448372.186
Diana Chang, Austin Lui, Alisa Matsoyan, Michael M. Safaee, Henry Aryan, Christopher Ames

Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non- peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.

在国际上,美国是腰背痛(LBP)费用负担最重的国家。其成本持续上升,速度超过了通货膨胀率和医疗支出的总体增长速度。我们对来自 PubMed、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 的同行评议和非同行评议文献进行了全面的文献综述,以了解有关患病率、成本和未来成本预测的当代数据。长期以来,美国的政策制定者一直试图通过限制低价值服务和早期成像来解决腰椎间盘突出症的高成本负担问题。尽管做出了这些努力,但成本(约 400 亿美元;约 2000 美元/患者/年)仍在继续上升,原因是无指征的影像学检查、高手术率以及随后的翻修手术率不断增加,且未对非药物治疗措施进行适当试验,腰椎间盘突出症的患病率也没有相应降低。在全球范围内,腰椎间盘突出症的总体发病率持续上升,这主要是由于人口老龄化的加剧。成本控制方法应侧重于对患者进行仔细、全面的临床评估,以便更好地了解何时需要采取资源密集型干预措施。
{"title":"Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally.","authors":"Diana Chang, Austin Lui, Alisa Matsoyan, Michael M. Safaee, Henry Aryan, Christopher Ames","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448372.186","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2448372.186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internationally, the United States (U.S.) cites the highest cost burden of low back pain (LBP). The cost continues to rise, faster than the rate of inflation and overall growth of health expenditures. We performed a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed and non- peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for contemporary data on prevalence, cost, and projected future costs. Policymakers in the U.S. have long attempted to address the high-cost burden of LBP through limiting low-value services and early imaging. Despite these efforts, costs (~$40 billion; ~$2,000/patient/yr) continue to rise with increasing rates of unindicated imaging, high rates of surgery, and subsequent revision surgery without proper trial of non-pharmacologic measures and no corresponding reduction in LBP prevalence. Globally, the overall prevalence of LBP continues to rise largely secondary to a growing aging population. Cost containment methods should focus on careful and comprehensive clinical assessment of patients to better understand when more resource-intensive interventions are indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224735/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidence and Survival of Patients With Malignant Primary Spinal Cord Tumors: A Population-Based Analysis. 恶性原发性脊髓肿瘤患者的发病率和生存率:基于人群的分析
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347300.650
Huanbing Liu, Linnan Duan, Zhibin Li, Yuanhao Liu, Yubo Wang

Objective: Epidemiological studies on spinal cord tumors are rare, and studies on primary intramedullary tumors are even rarer. The incidence and survival of patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors have not been well documented. We aimed to study the incidence and survival of patients with primary spinal cord malignant and borderline malignant tumors based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and provide information for revealing the epidemiology and exploring the prognosis of patients with primary intramedullary tumors.

Methods: Patients in the SEER database with microscopically diagnosed malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors from 2000 and 2019 were included in this study. We analyzed the distribution of patients according to the demographic and clinical characteristics. Then, we extracted the incidence rate and 5-year relative survival for the whole cohort and different subgroups of the cohort. Finally, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival.

Results: A total of 5,211 patients with malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors were included in this cohort study. Ependymoma, astrocytoma (including oligodendrogliomas and glioblastoma), lymphoma and hemangioblastoma were the most common pathological types. The age-adjusted incidence rates of primary spinal cord ependymoma was 0.18 per 100,000. The incidence rate for females was significantly lower than that for males. The incidence rate was highest in Caucasian. The incidence rate of ependymoma was significantly higher than that of other pathological types. The incidence of astrocytoma was highest among people aged 0-19 years, the incidence of ependymoma was highest among people aged 40-59 years, and the incidence of lymphoma was highest among people aged 60 years or older. The 5-year observed survival and relative survival rates for the whole cohort were 82.80% and 86.00%, respectively. Patients diagnosed with ependymoma had significantly better survival than their counterparts. We also found the impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with different tumors varies a lot.

Conclusion: We conducted a population-based analysis of malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors with the aim of revealing the epidemiology and survival of patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Despite some shortcomings, this study provides valuable information to help us better understand the epidemiological characteristics of primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors.

目的:有关脊髓肿瘤的流行病学研究非常罕见,而有关原发性髓内肿瘤的研究则更为罕见。原发性髓内脊髓肿瘤患者的发病率和生存率还没有很好的记录。我们的目的是根据监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据,研究原发性脊髓恶性肿瘤和边缘恶性肿瘤患者的发病率和生存率,为揭示原发性髓内肿瘤患者的流行病学和探讨其预后提供信息:本研究纳入了SEER数据库中2000年至2019年期间经显微镜诊断为恶性和边缘恶性原发性脊髓肿瘤的患者。我们根据人口统计学和临床特征分析了患者的分布情况。然后,我们提取了整个队列和队列中不同亚组的发病率和 5 年相对生存率。最后,我们使用多变量考克斯比例危险模型分析了与总生存率相关的独立预后因素:这项队列研究共纳入了5211名恶性和边缘恶性原发性脊髓肿瘤患者。最常见的病理类型为上皮瘤、星形细胞瘤(包括少突胶质细胞瘤和胶质母细胞瘤)、淋巴瘤和血管母细胞瘤。经年龄调整后,原发性脊髓上皮瘤的发病率为每 10 万人 0.18 例。女性发病率明显低于男性。白种人的发病率最高。上皮瘤的发病率明显高于其他病理类型。星形细胞瘤的发病率在 0-19 岁人群中最高,附脑瘤的发病率在 40-59 岁人群中最高,淋巴瘤的发病率在 60 岁或以上人群中最高。整个组群的 5 年观察存活率和相对存活率分别为 82.80% 和 86.00%。确诊为上皮瘤的患者的生存率明显高于同类患者。我们还发现,手术和化疗对不同肿瘤患者预后的影响差异很大:我们对恶性和边缘恶性原发性脊髓肿瘤进行了人群分析,旨在揭示原发性髓内脊髓肿瘤患者的流行病学和生存情况。尽管存在一些不足,但这项研究为我们更好地了解原发性髓内脊髓肿瘤的流行病学特征提供了有价值的信息。
{"title":"Incidence and Survival of Patients With Malignant Primary Spinal Cord Tumors: A Population-Based Analysis.","authors":"Huanbing Liu, Linnan Duan, Zhibin Li, Yuanhao Liu, Yubo Wang","doi":"10.14245/ns.2347300.650","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2347300.650","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Epidemiological studies on spinal cord tumors are rare, and studies on primary intramedullary tumors are even rarer. The incidence and survival of patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors have not been well documented. We aimed to study the incidence and survival of patients with primary spinal cord malignant and borderline malignant tumors based on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and provide information for revealing the epidemiology and exploring the prognosis of patients with primary intramedullary tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in the SEER database with microscopically diagnosed malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors from 2000 and 2019 were included in this study. We analyzed the distribution of patients according to the demographic and clinical characteristics. Then, we extracted the incidence rate and 5-year relative survival for the whole cohort and different subgroups of the cohort. Finally, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5,211 patients with malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors were included in this cohort study. Ependymoma, astrocytoma (including oligodendrogliomas and glioblastoma), lymphoma and hemangioblastoma were the most common pathological types. The age-adjusted incidence rates of primary spinal cord ependymoma was 0.18 per 100,000. The incidence rate for females was significantly lower than that for males. The incidence rate was highest in Caucasian. The incidence rate of ependymoma was significantly higher than that of other pathological types. The incidence of astrocytoma was highest among people aged 0-19 years, the incidence of ependymoma was highest among people aged 40-59 years, and the incidence of lymphoma was highest among people aged 60 years or older. The 5-year observed survival and relative survival rates for the whole cohort were 82.80% and 86.00%, respectively. Patients diagnosed with ependymoma had significantly better survival than their counterparts. We also found the impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with different tumors varies a lot.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conducted a population-based analysis of malignant and borderline malignant primary spinal cord tumors with the aim of revealing the epidemiology and survival of patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Despite some shortcomings, this study provides valuable information to help us better understand the epidemiological characteristics of primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Numbness Following Lumbar Fusion in Patients Older Than 75 Years: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. 75 岁以上患者腰椎融合术后持续麻木的预测因素:至少两年的随访
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347312.656
Takeru Tsujimoto, Masahiro Kanayama, Shotaro Fukada, Fumihiro Oha, Yukitoshi Shimamura, Yuichi Hasegawa, Tomoyuki Hashimoto, Kenichiro Kakutani, Takashi Yurube, Yoshiki Takeoka, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Norimasa Iwasaki

Objective: To evaluate the preoperative and perioperative predictors of persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion in patients aged ≥ 75 years.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study examined 304 patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative disease (102 men, 202 women; mean age, 79.2 [75-90] years). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for leg numbness was examined preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The persistent leg numbness group included patients with a 2-year postoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points. The demographic data were also reviewed. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed for variables with univariate analysis values of p < 0.2 on univariate analysis.

Results: In total, 71 patients (23.4%) experienced persistent postoperative leg numbness. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and a preoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points were associated with greater postoperative persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion. In contrast, other factors, such as sex, body mass index, vertebral fracture, diabetes mellitus, depression, symptom duration, dural injury, operative time, and estimated blood loss, were not.

Conclusion: A history of preoperative lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and greater preoperative VAS scores for leg numbness were preoperative predictors of persistent postoperative leg numbness following lumbar fusion in older patients. Although lumbar fusion is expected to improve leg numbness, surgeons should consider the surgical history, duration, and preoperative numbness intensity and explain the potential postoperative persistent leg numbness in advance.

目的评估年龄≥75 岁患者腰椎融合术后持续腿麻的术前和围手术期预测因素:这项单中心回顾性研究对 304 名年龄≥ 75 岁、因腰椎退行性疾病接受腰椎融合术的患者(102 名男性,202 名女性;平均年龄 79.2 [75-90] 岁)进行了调查。对术前和术后两年的腿麻视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分进行了检查。持续腿麻组包括术后 2 年腿麻 VAS 评分≥ 5 分的患者。此外,还审查了人口统计学数据。对于单变量分析值 p < 0.2 的变量进行了多变量逐步逻辑回归分析:共有 71 名患者(23.4%)在术后出现持续性腿部麻木。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,腰椎减压病史、症状持续时间较长、术前腿麻VAS评分≥5分与腰椎融合术后持续腿麻程度加重有关。相比之下,其他因素,如性别、体重指数、椎体骨折、糖尿病、抑郁、症状持续时间、硬膜损伤、手术时间和估计失血量等,则与之无关:结论:术前腰椎减压史、症状持续时间较长、术前腿麻VAS评分较高是老年患者腰椎融合术后持续腿麻的术前预测因素。虽然腰椎融合术有望改善腿部麻木,但外科医生应考虑手术史、持续时间和术前麻木强度,并提前解释术后可能出现的持续腿部麻木。
{"title":"Predictors of Persistent Postoperative Numbness Following Lumbar Fusion in Patients Older Than 75 Years: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.","authors":"Takeru Tsujimoto, Masahiro Kanayama, Shotaro Fukada, Fumihiro Oha, Yukitoshi Shimamura, Yuichi Hasegawa, Tomoyuki Hashimoto, Kenichiro Kakutani, Takashi Yurube, Yoshiki Takeoka, Kunihiko Miyazaki, Norimasa Iwasaki","doi":"10.14245/ns.2347312.656","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2347312.656","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the preoperative and perioperative predictors of persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion in patients aged ≥ 75 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study examined 304 patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative disease (102 men, 202 women; mean age, 79.2 [75-90] years). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for leg numbness was examined preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The persistent leg numbness group included patients with a 2-year postoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points. The demographic data were also reviewed. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed for variables with univariate analysis values of p < 0.2 on univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 71 patients (23.4%) experienced persistent postoperative leg numbness. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and a preoperative VAS score for leg numbness ≥ 5 points were associated with greater postoperative persistent leg numbness following lumbar fusion. In contrast, other factors, such as sex, body mass index, vertebral fracture, diabetes mellitus, depression, symptom duration, dural injury, operative time, and estimated blood loss, were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A history of preoperative lumbar decompression, longer symptom duration, and greater preoperative VAS scores for leg numbness were preoperative predictors of persistent postoperative leg numbness following lumbar fusion in older patients. Although lumbar fusion is expected to improve leg numbness, surgeons should consider the surgical history, duration, and preoperative numbness intensity and explain the potential postoperative persistent leg numbness in advance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224755/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery. 混合人工椎间盘或零轮廓装置治疗 ACDF 翻修手术中单级相邻节段退变的生物力学分析。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347330.665
Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai

Objective: Cervical hybrid surgery optimizes the use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and zero-profile (ZOP) devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) but lacks uniform combination and biomechanical standards, especially in revision surgery (RS). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments of the different hybrid RS constructs in ACDF RS.

Methods: An intact 3-dimensional finite element model generated a normal cervical spine (C2-T1). This model was modified to the primary C5-6 ACDF model. Three RS models were created to treat C4-5 adjacent segment degeneration through implanting cages plus plates (Cage-Cage), ZOP devices (ZOP-Cage), or Bryan discs (CDA-Cage). A 1.0-Nm moment was applied to the primary C5-6 ACDF model to generate total C2-T1 range of motions (ROMs). Subsequently, a displacement load was applied to all RS models to match the total C2-T1 ROMs of the primary ACDF model.

Results: The ZOP-Cage model showed lower biomechanical responses including ROM, intradiscal pressure, maximum von Mises stress in discs, and facet joint force in adjacent segments compared to the Cage-Cage model. The CDA-Cage model exhibited the lowest biomechanical responses and ROM ratio at adjacent segments among all RS models, closely approached or lower than those in the primary ACDF model in most motion directions. Additionally, the maximum von Mises stress on the C3-4 and C6-7 discs increased in the Cage-Cage and ZOP-Cage models but decreased in the CDA-Cage model when compared to the primary ACDF model.

Conclusion: The CDA-Cage construct had the lowest biomechanical responses with minimal kinematic change of adjacent segments. ZOP-Cage is the next best choice, especially if CDA is not suitable. This study provides a biomechanical reference for clinical hybrid RS decision-making to reduce the risk of ASD recurrence.

目的:颈椎混合手术优化了颈椎间盘关节成形术(CDA)和零轮廓(ZOP)器械在颈椎前路椎间盘切除和融合术(ACDF)中的应用,但缺乏统一的组合和生物力学标准,尤其是在翻修手术(RS)中。本研究旨在探讨 ACDF RS 中不同混合 RS 构架相邻节段的生物力学特征:一个完整的三维有限元模型生成了一个正常的颈椎(C2-T1)。该模型被修改为主要的 C5-6 ACDF 模型。创建了三个RS模型,通过植入笼加板(Cage-Cage)、ZOP装置(ZOP-Cage)或布莱恩椎间盘(CDA-Cage)来治疗C4-5邻近节段退变。对主要的 C5-6 ACDF 模型施加 1.0-Nm 的力矩,以产生 C2-T1 的总运动范围 (ROM)。随后,对所有 RS 模型施加位移载荷,使其与主 ACDF 模型的 C2-T1 总 ROM 相匹配:结果:与Cage-Cage模型相比,ZOP-Cage模型显示出较低的生物力学反应,包括ROM、椎间盘内压、椎间盘最大von Mises应力和相邻节段的面关节力。在所有 RS 模型中,CDA-Cage 模型的生物力学反应和相邻节段的 ROM 比率最低,在大多数运动方向上接近或低于主要 ACDF 模型。此外,与初级 ACDF 模型相比,Cage-Cage 模型和 ZOP-Cage 模型中 C3-4 和 C6-7 椎间盘的最大 von Mises 应力有所增加,而 CDA-Cage 模型则有所减少:结论:CDA-Cage结构的生物力学反应最低,相邻节段的运动学变化最小。结论:CDA-Cage 结构的生物力学反应最低,相邻节段的运动学变化最小。ZOP-Cage 是下一个最佳选择,尤其是在不适合 CDA 的情况下。这项研究为临床混合RS决策提供了生物力学参考,以降低ASD复发的风险。
{"title":"Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery.","authors":"Weishi Liang, Yihan Yang, Bo Han, Duan Sun, Peng Yin, Yong Hai","doi":"10.14245/ns.2347330.665","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2347330.665","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cervical hybrid surgery optimizes the use of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and zero-profile (ZOP) devices in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) but lacks uniform combination and biomechanical standards, especially in revision surgery (RS). This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of adjacent segments of the different hybrid RS constructs in ACDF RS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An intact 3-dimensional finite element model generated a normal cervical spine (C2-T1). This model was modified to the primary C5-6 ACDF model. Three RS models were created to treat C4-5 adjacent segment degeneration through implanting cages plus plates (Cage-Cage), ZOP devices (ZOP-Cage), or Bryan discs (CDA-Cage). A 1.0-Nm moment was applied to the primary C5-6 ACDF model to generate total C2-T1 range of motions (ROMs). Subsequently, a displacement load was applied to all RS models to match the total C2-T1 ROMs of the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ZOP-Cage model showed lower biomechanical responses including ROM, intradiscal pressure, maximum von Mises stress in discs, and facet joint force in adjacent segments compared to the Cage-Cage model. The CDA-Cage model exhibited the lowest biomechanical responses and ROM ratio at adjacent segments among all RS models, closely approached or lower than those in the primary ACDF model in most motion directions. Additionally, the maximum von Mises stress on the C3-4 and C6-7 discs increased in the Cage-Cage and ZOP-Cage models but decreased in the CDA-Cage model when compared to the primary ACDF model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CDA-Cage construct had the lowest biomechanical responses with minimal kinematic change of adjacent segments. ZOP-Cage is the next best choice, especially if CDA is not suitable. This study provides a biomechanical reference for clinical hybrid RS decision-making to reduce the risk of ASD recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224737/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacological Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Critical Review of Current Evidence. 退行性颈椎病的药物治疗:对当前证据的严格审查
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448140.070
Jordan J Levett, Miltiadis Georgiopoulos, Simon Martel, Wissam Al Mugheiry, Nikolaos A Stavropoulos, Miguel Vega-Arroyo, Carlo Santaguida, Michael H Weber, Jeff D Golan, Peter Jarzem, Jean A Ouellet, Georgios Klironomos, Andreas K Demetriades

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, representing substantial morbidity and significant financial and resource burdens. Typically, patients with progressive DCM will eventually receive surgical treatment. Nonetheless, despite advancements in pharmacotherapeutics, evidence for pharmacological therapy remains limited. Health professionals from various fields would find interest in pharmacological agents that could benefit patients with mild DCM or enhance surgical outcomes. This review aims to consolidate all clinical and experimental evidence on the pharmacological treatment of DCM. We conducted a comprehensive narrative review that presents all pharmacological agents that have been investigated for DCM treatment in both humans and animal models. Riluzole exhibits effectiveness solely in rat models, but not in treating mild DCM in humans. Cerebrolysin emerges as a potential neuroprotective agent for myelopathy in animals but had contradictory results in clinical trials. Limaprost alfadex demonstrates motor function improvement in animal models and exhibits promising outcomes in a small clinical trial. Glucocorticoids not only fail to provide clinical benefits but may also lead to adverse events. Cilostazol, anti-Fas ligand antibody, and Jingshu Keli display promise in animal studies, while erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and limaprost alfadex exhibit potential in both animal and human research. Existing evidence mainly rests on weak clinical data and animal experimentation. Current pharmacological efforts target ion channels, stem cell differentiation, inflammatory, vascular, and apoptotic pathways. The inherent nature and pathogenesis of DCM offer substantial prospects for developing neurodegenerative or neuroprotective therapies capable of altering disease progression, potentially delaying surgical intervention, and optimizing outcomes for those undergoing surgical decompression.

退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)是导致成人脊髓功能障碍的主要原因,不仅发病率高,而且会带来巨大的经济和资源负担。通常情况下,进展性 DCM 患者最终会接受手术治疗。然而,尽管药物治疗取得了进步,但药物治疗的证据仍然有限。各领域的医疗专业人员都会对能使轻度 DCM 患者受益或提高手术效果的药理药物感兴趣。本综述旨在整合有关 DCM 药物治疗的所有临床和实验证据。我们进行了全面的叙述性综述,介绍了在人体和动物模型中用于 DCM 治疗的所有药理药物。利鲁唑仅对大鼠模型有效,但对治疗人类轻度 DCM 无效。脑活素是一种潜在的神经保护剂,可治疗动物脊髓病,但在临床试验中的结果却相互矛盾。利马前列素(Limaprost alfadex)可改善动物模型的运动功能,并在一项小型临床试验中显示出良好的疗效。糖皮质激素不仅不能带来临床疗效,还可能导致不良反应。西洛他唑、抗 Fas 配体抗体和京舒克力在动物实验中表现出良好的疗效,而促红细胞生成素、粒细胞集落刺激因子和利马前列素在动物和人体研究中均表现出潜力。现有证据主要依赖于薄弱的临床数据和动物实验。目前的药理学研究主要针对离子通道、干细胞分化、炎症、血管和细胞凋亡途径。DCM 的固有性质和发病机制为开发神经退行性变或神经保护疗法提供了广阔的前景,这些疗法能够改变疾病的进展,有可能推迟手术干预,并优化接受手术减压者的预后。
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Critical Review of Current Evidence.","authors":"Jordan J Levett, Miltiadis Georgiopoulos, Simon Martel, Wissam Al Mugheiry, Nikolaos A Stavropoulos, Miguel Vega-Arroyo, Carlo Santaguida, Michael H Weber, Jeff D Golan, Peter Jarzem, Jean A Ouellet, Georgios Klironomos, Andreas K Demetriades","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448140.070","DOIUrl":"10.14245/ns.2448140.070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, representing substantial morbidity and significant financial and resource burdens. Typically, patients with progressive DCM will eventually receive surgical treatment. Nonetheless, despite advancements in pharmacotherapeutics, evidence for pharmacological therapy remains limited. Health professionals from various fields would find interest in pharmacological agents that could benefit patients with mild DCM or enhance surgical outcomes. This review aims to consolidate all clinical and experimental evidence on the pharmacological treatment of DCM. We conducted a comprehensive narrative review that presents all pharmacological agents that have been investigated for DCM treatment in both humans and animal models. Riluzole exhibits effectiveness solely in rat models, but not in treating mild DCM in humans. Cerebrolysin emerges as a potential neuroprotective agent for myelopathy in animals but had contradictory results in clinical trials. Limaprost alfadex demonstrates motor function improvement in animal models and exhibits promising outcomes in a small clinical trial. Glucocorticoids not only fail to provide clinical benefits but may also lead to adverse events. Cilostazol, anti-Fas ligand antibody, and Jingshu Keli display promise in animal studies, while erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and limaprost alfadex exhibit potential in both animal and human research. Existing evidence mainly rests on weak clinical data and animal experimentation. Current pharmacological efforts target ion channels, stem cell differentiation, inflammatory, vascular, and apoptotic pathways. The inherent nature and pathogenesis of DCM offer substantial prospects for developing neurodegenerative or neuroprotective therapies capable of altering disease progression, potentially delaying surgical intervention, and optimizing outcomes for those undergoing surgical decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11224758/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Hemofence (Thorombin Cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gel Matrix) in Hemostasis for Intractable Exudative Bleeding in Spinal Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial. 评估 Hemofence(索伦宾交联透明质酸钠凝胶基质)用于脊柱手术中顽固性渗出性出血止血的有效性和安全性:多中心、随机、III 期临床试验。
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448024.012
Sungjae An, Woo-Keun Kwon, Il Choi, Jang-Bo Lee, Joohyun Kim, Junseok W. Hur
ObjectiveTo demonstrate the non-inferiority of the novel hemostatic agent, Hemofence® (BMI Korea Co. Ltd., Jeju Korea, thrombin cross-linked sodium hyaluronate gel matrix) compared to the established agent, Floseal Hemostatic Matrix (Baxter, thrombin-gelatin matrix) in achieving hemostasis for spinal surgeries, with secondary objectives to assess additional efficacy and safety.MethodsThis clinical trial was a multicenter, randomized, subject-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Investigational drugs were administered to the first and second bleeding sites of each participant (or only to the first site if a second site was absent), evaluating hemostasis success rate within 10 minutes and the time to achieve hemostasis. Subsequent visits were conducted for safety assessments. For non-inferiority test, a 97.5% one-sided confidence interval was used; the test group was deemed non-inferior if the lower limit exceeded -10%.ResultsThis trial showed a 97.10% success rate in the test group and 96.05% in the control group for primary efficacy. The 95% confidence interval (-4.90%, 7.44%) confirmed the test drug's non-inferiority. Time to hemostasis showed no significant difference between groups. All adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and serious adverse events were statistically similar between groups (p=1.0000, p=0.2427, and p=0.9663, respectively).ConclusionA novel hemostatic agent, Hemofence®, demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile comparable to that of Floseal.
目的 证明新型止血剂 Hemofence®(BMI Korea Co.Ltd.,济州韩国,凝血酶交联透明质酸钠凝胶基质)与已有止血剂 Floseal Hemostatic Matrix(百特公司,凝血酶-明胶基质)相比,在实现脊柱手术止血方面并无劣势,次要目标是评估其他疗效和安全性。在每位受试者的第一和第二出血部位(如果没有第二出血部位,则只在第一出血部位)使用研究药物,评估10分钟内的止血成功率和实现止血的时间。随后进行安全性评估。在非劣效性测试中,采用了 97.5% 的单侧置信区间;如果下限超过-10%,则认为试验组为非劣效。95%的置信区间(-4.90%,7.44%)证实了试验药物的非劣效性。两组的止血时间无明显差异。结论 新型止血剂 Hemofence® 的疗效和安全性与 Floseal 相当。
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Hemofence (Thorombin Cross-linked Sodium Hyaluronate Gel Matrix) in Hemostasis for Intractable Exudative Bleeding in Spinal Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized, Phase III Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sungjae An, Woo-Keun Kwon, Il Choi, Jang-Bo Lee, Joohyun Kim, Junseok W. Hur","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448024.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448024.012","url":null,"abstract":"Objective\u0000To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the novel hemostatic agent, Hemofence® (BMI Korea Co. Ltd., Jeju Korea, thrombin cross-linked sodium hyaluronate gel matrix) compared to the established agent, Floseal Hemostatic Matrix (Baxter, thrombin-gelatin matrix) in achieving hemostasis for spinal surgeries, with secondary objectives to assess additional efficacy and safety.\u0000\u0000\u0000Methods\u0000This clinical trial was a multicenter, randomized, subject-blinded, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Investigational drugs were administered to the first and second bleeding sites of each participant (or only to the first site if a second site was absent), evaluating hemostasis success rate within 10 minutes and the time to achieve hemostasis. Subsequent visits were conducted for safety assessments. For non-inferiority test, a 97.5% one-sided confidence interval was used; the test group was deemed non-inferior if the lower limit exceeded -10%.\u0000\u0000\u0000Results\u0000This trial showed a 97.10% success rate in the test group and 96.05% in the control group for primary efficacy. The 95% confidence interval (-4.90%, 7.44%) confirmed the test drug's non-inferiority. Time to hemostasis showed no significant difference between groups. All adverse events, adverse drug reactions, and serious adverse events were statistically similar between groups (p=1.0000, p=0.2427, and p=0.9663, respectively).\u0000\u0000\u0000Conclusion\u0000A novel hemostatic agent, Hemofence®, demonstrated an efficacy and safety profile comparable to that of Floseal.","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140744026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques” 关于 "比较 3 种不同脊柱椎弓根螺钉固定方法的倾向得分匹配队列研究:徒手、荧光透视引导和机器人辅助技术 "的评论
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448240.120
J. Oh
The landscape of spine surgery has undergone a remarkable transformation with the emergence of advanced technologies. While robotics in spine surgery made its debut in the early 2000s, the past decade has seen a resurgence of interest in robotic-assisted procedures, likely driven by improved technology and refinements in technique. 1 The integration of robotics into spine surgery promises numerous opportunities. One of its foremost advantages lies in its capacity to guide pedicle screw insertion with real-time navigation based on preoperative planning. This precision not only minimizes tissue trauma but also reduces radiation. 2 Additionally, it has been used to complement lateral inter-body fusion surgery, percutaneous iliac screw fixation, spinal endoscopy, and sacroiliac joint fusion, further enhancing its applicability across various spinal procedures. 3,4 In the March special issue of Neurospine , Hwang et al. 5 conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of 3 pedicle screw fixation methods in their article titled “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Meth-ods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques”. To date, most studies have been single-or double-arm studies, with few clinical outcomes reported. 6,7 This article sheds more light through a deeper comparative analysis. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing propensity score matching to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted surgery with conventional techniques. Specifically, they analyzed C-arm guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and freehand open posterior lumbar interbody fusion involving 162 patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Each group comprised 54 patients after propensity score matching. The study evaluated various parameters, including surgical accuracy, radiological outcomes, clinical improvement, and complications for
随着先进技术的出现,脊柱外科的格局发生了显著变化。虽然脊柱手术中的机器人技术在本世纪初才首次亮相,但在过去的十年中,人们对机器人辅助手术的兴趣再次高涨,这很可能是由于技术的改进和技术的完善。1 将机器人技术融入脊柱手术有望带来众多机遇。其最重要的优势之一在于能根据术前规划实时导航,引导椎弓根螺钉的插入。这种精确性不仅能最大限度地减少组织创伤,还能减少辐射。2 此外,它还被用于辅助侧方椎体间融合手术、经皮髂骨螺钉固定、脊柱内窥镜检查和骶髂关节融合术,进一步提高了其在各种脊柱手术中的适用性。3,4 在《神经脊柱》(Neurospine)三月特刊中,Hwang 等人5 在题为 "比较 3 种不同脊柱椎弓根螺钉固定方法的倾向得分匹配队列研究"(A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Meth-ods)一文中对 3 种椎弓根螺钉固定方法进行了全面的比较分析:自由操作、透视引导和机器人辅助技术 "一文中。迄今为止,大多数研究都是单臂或双臂研究,很少有临床结果报告。6,7本文通过更深入的对比分析揭示了更多信息。作者利用倾向得分匹配法进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了机器人辅助手术与传统技术的疗效。具体来说,他们分析了 C 臂引导下的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术和徒手开放式后路腰椎椎体间融合术,共涉及 162 名腰椎退行性疾病患者。经过倾向评分匹配后,每组由 54 名患者组成。研究评估了各种参数,包括手术准确性、放射学结果、临床改善和并发症。
{"title":"Commentary on “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques”","authors":"J. Oh","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448240.120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448240.120","url":null,"abstract":"The landscape of spine surgery has undergone a remarkable transformation with the emergence of advanced technologies. While robotics in spine surgery made its debut in the early 2000s, the past decade has seen a resurgence of interest in robotic-assisted procedures, likely driven by improved technology and refinements in technique. 1 The integration of robotics into spine surgery promises numerous opportunities. One of its foremost advantages lies in its capacity to guide pedicle screw insertion with real-time navigation based on preoperative planning. This precision not only minimizes tissue trauma but also reduces radiation. 2 Additionally, it has been used to complement lateral inter-body fusion surgery, percutaneous iliac screw fixation, spinal endoscopy, and sacroiliac joint fusion, further enhancing its applicability across various spinal procedures. 3,4 In the March special issue of Neurospine , Hwang et al. 5 conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of 3 pedicle screw fixation methods in their article titled “A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Meth-ods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques”. To date, most studies have been single-or double-arm studies, with few clinical outcomes reported. 6,7 This article sheds more light through a deeper comparative analysis. The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing propensity score matching to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted surgery with conventional techniques. Specifically, they analyzed C-arm guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and freehand open posterior lumbar interbody fusion involving 162 patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Each group comprised 54 patients after propensity score matching. The study evaluated various parameters, including surgical accuracy, radiological outcomes, clinical improvement, and complications for","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140357690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Commentary on “Use of ChatGPT for Determining Clinical and Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy: A North American Spine Society Guideline Comparison” 关于 "使用 ChatGPT 确定腰椎间盘突出症伴根性病变的临床和手术治疗 "的评论:北美脊柱学会指南比较"
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448248.124
A. Seas, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
Clinical medicine is a constantly changing field. However, no change is perhaps as drastic as the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice. This rapid adaptation has recently been stretched with the introduction of the chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) in 2022. Unlike many other complex tools for ML, ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) developed with the intent for rapid use by the lay audience. The tremendously low barrier to entry—namely involving generation of an account—has led to expansive interest in the use of ChatGPT in nearly every subfield of surgery, including spine surgery and low back pain. The goal of the study by Mejia et al. 1 was to assess the ability of ChatGPT to provide accurate medical information regarding the care of patients with lumbar disk herniation with radiculopathy. The research team developed a series of questions related to lumbar disk herniation, us-ing the 2012 North American Spine Society (NASS) guidelines as a gold standard. 2 They then collected responses from both ChatGPT-3.5, and ChatGPT-4.0. They quantified several metrics for each response. A response was considered accurate if it did not contradict the NASS guidelines. It was considered overconclusive if it provided a recommendation when the NASS guidelines did not provide sufficient evidence. A response was supplementary if it included additional relevant information for the question. Finally, a response was considered incomplete if it was accurate but omitted relevant information included within the NASS guidelines. Both ChatGPT-3.5 and -4.0 provided accurate responses to just over 50% of questions. Nearly half of all responses were also overconclusive, providing recommendations without direct
临床医学是一个不断变化的领域。然而,没有什么变化能像机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)融入临床实践这样剧烈。最近,随着 2022 年聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)的推出,这种快速适应得到了延伸。与许多其他复杂的 ML 工具不同,ChatGPT 是一种大型语言模型(LLM),其开发目的是为了让非专业人士也能快速使用。由于入门门槛极低--只需生成一个账户,因此几乎所有外科子领域都对 ChatGPT 的使用产生了浓厚的兴趣,包括脊柱外科和腰背痛领域。Mejia 等人 1 的研究目标是评估 ChatGPT 在为腰椎间盘突出症合并根神经病患者提供准确医疗信息方面的能力。研究小组以 2012 年北美脊柱协会 (NASS) 指南为黄金标准,提出了一系列与腰椎间盘突出症相关的问题。2 然后,他们收集了 ChatGPT-3.5 和 ChatGPT-4.0 的回答。他们对每个回复进行了量化。如果答复与 NASS 指南不矛盾,则认为答复准确。如果在 NASS 指南没有提供足够证据的情况下提供了建议,则被视为过度结论。如果答复中包含与问题相关的补充信息,则被视为补充性答复。最后,如果回答准确但遗漏了 NASS 指南中的相关信息,则被视为不完整。ChatGPT-3.5 和 -4.0 都对略高于 50% 的问题做出了准确的回答。近一半的回答也是过度结论性的,提供的建议并没有直接反映出问题的严重性。
{"title":"Commentary on “Use of ChatGPT for Determining Clinical and Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation With Radiculopathy: A North American Spine Society Guideline Comparison”","authors":"A. Seas, Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448248.124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448248.124","url":null,"abstract":"Clinical medicine is a constantly changing field. However, no change is perhaps as drastic as the integration of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice. This rapid adaptation has recently been stretched with the introduction of the chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) in 2022. Unlike many other complex tools for ML, ChatGPT is a large language model (LLM) developed with the intent for rapid use by the lay audience. The tremendously low barrier to entry—namely involving generation of an account—has led to expansive interest in the use of ChatGPT in nearly every subfield of surgery, including spine surgery and low back pain. The goal of the study by Mejia et al. 1 was to assess the ability of ChatGPT to provide accurate medical information regarding the care of patients with lumbar disk herniation with radiculopathy. The research team developed a series of questions related to lumbar disk herniation, us-ing the 2012 North American Spine Society (NASS) guidelines as a gold standard. 2 They then collected responses from both ChatGPT-3.5, and ChatGPT-4.0. They quantified several metrics for each response. A response was considered accurate if it did not contradict the NASS guidelines. It was considered overconclusive if it provided a recommendation when the NASS guidelines did not provide sufficient evidence. A response was supplementary if it included additional relevant information for the question. Finally, a response was considered incomplete if it was accurate but omitted relevant information included within the NASS guidelines. Both ChatGPT-3.5 and -4.0 provided accurate responses to just over 50% of questions. Nearly half of all responses were also overconclusive, providing recommendations without direct","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140360267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expanding the Scope of Robotic Spinal Surgery With Bone Decompression: Commentary on “Advancements and Challenges in Robot-Assisted Bone Processing in Neurosurgical Procedures” 通过骨减压扩展机器人脊柱手术的范围:关于 "神经外科手术中机器人辅助骨处理的进展与挑战 "的评论
IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448210.105
Stephen Ryu
{"title":"Expanding the Scope of Robotic Spinal Surgery With Bone Decompression: Commentary on “Advancements and Challenges in Robot-Assisted Bone Processing in Neurosurgical Procedures”","authors":"Stephen Ryu","doi":"10.14245/ns.2448210.105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2448210.105","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140358738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Neurospine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1