Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-06DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11337
Yan Shen, Hongmin Qin, Xiaosu Liu, Lu Liu, Shuang Chen, Yuqi Yang, Jing Yuan, Yan Zha
Background: The role of calf circumference (CC) in predicting sarcopenia and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains debated. This study assessed CC's predictive value, optimal threshold, and mortality association in older patients undergoing MHD.
Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted on older adult patients undergoing MHD. Sarcopenia was defined by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to explore the relationship between CC and sarcopenia. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed survival over 2 years.
Results: A total of 979 older adult patients undergoing MHD treatment, with an average age of 73.4 years, were included in this study. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 61.1%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; P = 0.017) and CC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for sarcopenia through multifactorial logistic regression analysis. ROC curves for CC and sarcopenia indicated that the optimal cutoff value for men was 32.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.904; sensitivity, 0.958; specificity, 0.841), whereas for women, it was 31.9 cm (AUC, 0.884; sensitivity, 0.922; specificity: 0.756). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated lower survival probabilities in patients with sarcopenia and low CC. After adjustment for multiple factors, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients in the sarcopenia group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.411; P = 0.017) and those in the low-CC group (HR = 2.045; P = 0.046) had significantly shorter overall survival.
Conclusions: CC is an independent predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in older patients undergoing MHD.
{"title":"Calf circumference predicts sarcopenia and all-cause mortality in older patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Yan Shen, Hongmin Qin, Xiaosu Liu, Lu Liu, Shuang Chen, Yuqi Yang, Jing Yuan, Yan Zha","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11337","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.11337","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of calf circumference (CC) in predicting sarcopenia and mortality of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains debated. This study assessed CC's predictive value, optimal threshold, and mortality association in older patients undergoing MHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted on older adult patients undergoing MHD. Sarcopenia was defined by European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to explore the relationship between CC and sarcopenia. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses assessed survival over 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 979 older adult patients undergoing MHD treatment, with an average age of 73.4 years, were included in this study. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 61.1%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.45; P = 0.017) and CC (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56; P < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for sarcopenia through multifactorial logistic regression analysis. ROC curves for CC and sarcopenia indicated that the optimal cutoff value for men was 32.5 cm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.904; sensitivity, 0.958; specificity, 0.841), whereas for women, it was 31.9 cm (AUC, 0.884; sensitivity, 0.922; specificity: 0.756). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated lower survival probabilities in patients with sarcopenia and low CC. After adjustment for multiple factors, Cox regression analysis revealed that patients in the sarcopenia group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.411; P = 0.017) and those in the low-CC group (HR = 2.045; P = 0.046) had significantly shorter overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CC is an independent predictor of sarcopenia and mortality in older patients undergoing MHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"235-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779189/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144567682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11326
Zeynep Kahyaoglu, Olgun Deniz, Merve Güner, Arzu Okyar Baş, Serdar Ceylan, Süheyla Çöteli, Burcu Balam Doğu, Mustafa Cankurtaran, Meltem Gülhan Halil
Background: Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is an often-overlooked problem in older adults, and ultrasonography (US) is one of the methods that can be used for diagnosis. Frailty, another geriatric syndrome in older adults, is an important clinical marker associated with many physical and cognitive conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and SO, diagnosed with different muscle mass measurement methods.
Methods: A total of 142 patients with obesity between the ages of 65 and 88 years who were admitted to the geriatric outpatient clinic were included. SO was defined using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and muscle US. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used for the assessment of frailty.
Results: The prevalence of SO according to muscle US and BIA were 63.7% (n = 79) and 9.1% (n = 13), respectively. SO was significantly more common in participants living with frailty than robust counterparts according to both diagnostic tools (P < 0.05 for all). In regression analysis, it was found that SO, diagnosed by BIA and US, was independently associated with frailty regardless of confounding factors (odds ratio: 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-7.92, and P = 0.007 for US-diagnosed SO; odds ratio: 6.85, 95% CI: 1.19-39.55, and P = 0.032 for BIA-diagnosed SO).
Conclusion: The study found a higher prevalence of SO in participants living with frailty, with significant and independent associations observed using both muscle US and BIA.
{"title":"Sarcopenic obesity is independently associated with frailty in geriatric outpatients: A cross-sectional study from university hospital.","authors":"Zeynep Kahyaoglu, Olgun Deniz, Merve Güner, Arzu Okyar Baş, Serdar Ceylan, Süheyla Çöteli, Burcu Balam Doğu, Mustafa Cankurtaran, Meltem Gülhan Halil","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11326","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.11326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is an often-overlooked problem in older adults, and ultrasonography (US) is one of the methods that can be used for diagnosis. Frailty, another geriatric syndrome in older adults, is an important clinical marker associated with many physical and cognitive conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between frailty and SO, diagnosed with different muscle mass measurement methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 142 patients with obesity between the ages of 65 and 88 years who were admitted to the geriatric outpatient clinic were included. SO was defined using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and muscle US. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was used for the assessment of frailty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of SO according to muscle US and BIA were 63.7% (n = 79) and 9.1% (n = 13), respectively. SO was significantly more common in participants living with frailty than robust counterparts according to both diagnostic tools (P < 0.05 for all). In regression analysis, it was found that SO, diagnosed by BIA and US, was independently associated with frailty regardless of confounding factors (odds ratio: 3.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38-7.92, and P = 0.007 for US-diagnosed SO; odds ratio: 6.85, 95% CI: 1.19-39.55, and P = 0.032 for BIA-diagnosed SO).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found a higher prevalence of SO in participants living with frailty, with significant and independent associations observed using both muscle US and BIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"85-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144226087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70047
Cagney Cristancho, Kris M Mogensen, Malcolm K Robinson
Obesity is a growing global health concern and clinicians are frequently faced with developing a nutrition care plan for patients with obesity that includes assessment of energy requirements. Although indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining resting energy expenditure, it is not readily available to all clinicians. This review provides an overview of estimating resting energy expenditure for patients with obesity in the inpatient and outpatient settings, including the use of IC and selecting an appropriate predictive equation when measuring energy expenditure is not possible with IC.
{"title":"Assessment of energy requirements in patients with obesity: A narrative review.","authors":"Cagney Cristancho, Kris M Mogensen, Malcolm K Robinson","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70047","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a growing global health concern and clinicians are frequently faced with developing a nutrition care plan for patients with obesity that includes assessment of energy requirements. Although indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for determining resting energy expenditure, it is not readily available to all clinicians. This review provides an overview of estimating resting energy expenditure for patients with obesity in the inpatient and outpatient settings, including the use of IC and selecting an appropriate predictive equation when measuring energy expenditure is not possible with IC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"54-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145346333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-09DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70065
Molly DePrenger, Melissa Morales-Perez, Alex Lynch
Obesity, clinically defined as an excess of adipose tissue, remains a growing public health concern because of its strong association with cardiometabolic comorbidities and the impact on the quality of life of those affected by this disease. Although body mass index (BMI) is widely used for diagnosing and stratifying obesity, it has limitations, including its inability to capture body fat distribution or differentiate between visceral and subcutaneous fat, key determinants in metabolic disease. This article reviews the incorporation of anthropometric and body composition assessment tools, including waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio, body roundness index, conicity index, sagittal abdominal diameter, a body shape index, and skinfold measurements in obesity diagnosis and their potential to offer greater insight into obesity-related health risks than BMI alone. Additionally, we explore home-based assessment tools-including digital scales, at-home WC measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, body scanning apps, and commercial dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-in supporting remote weight management in telehealth settings. Although these tools show promise, they vary in accuracy, accessibility, and usability. Integrating both clinic-based and home-based assessments into routine obesity care may improve risk stratification and support individualized interventions.
{"title":"Practical tools for evaluating body fat distribution: Applications in clinical and home-based weight management.","authors":"Molly DePrenger, Melissa Morales-Perez, Alex Lynch","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70065","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity, clinically defined as an excess of adipose tissue, remains a growing public health concern because of its strong association with cardiometabolic comorbidities and the impact on the quality of life of those affected by this disease. Although body mass index (BMI) is widely used for diagnosing and stratifying obesity, it has limitations, including its inability to capture body fat distribution or differentiate between visceral and subcutaneous fat, key determinants in metabolic disease. This article reviews the incorporation of anthropometric and body composition assessment tools, including waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio, waist to height ratio, body roundness index, conicity index, sagittal abdominal diameter, a body shape index, and skinfold measurements in obesity diagnosis and their potential to offer greater insight into obesity-related health risks than BMI alone. Additionally, we explore home-based assessment tools-including digital scales, at-home WC measurements, bioelectrical impedance analysis, body scanning apps, and commercial dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)-in supporting remote weight management in telehealth settings. Although these tools show promise, they vary in accuracy, accessibility, and usability. Integrating both clinic-based and home-based assessments into routine obesity care may improve risk stratification and support individualized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-19DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11352
Annalijn I Conklin, Derek Tian, Victoria Janzen, Alena Spears, Naomi Johnson, Caroline Kaufman, Sinead Feeney
Background: Hospital nutrition services rarely offer Indigenous-specific menu options, an essential element of delivering "Indigenous cultural safety" in nutrition care to Indigenous patients.
Methods: Indigenous participants (n = 370) completed a semistructured Indigenous Food Ways survey (paper-based and online) from 2021 to 2022 as part of continuous healthcare quality improvement. Descriptive statistics summarized cultural/traditional foods respondents wanted to see or did not want to see as options on hospital menus.
Results: A majority of respondents (83%) agreed that a menu option for cultural/traditional foods was important, with 716 unique items reported. Seafood and meat/alternatives were common cultural/traditional items for menu options, specifically salmon (22%), traditional meat (14%), moose (12%), and venison (12%). Grain items reported were mostly Bannock (22%). Nearly 20% of the sample listed traditional foods, medicine, or tea as options for hospital menus. Respondents identified 254 items they did not want to see on hospital menus, which were commonly energy-dense/processed foods (16%) or poorly prepared/flavored items (13%), as well as peas and carrots (7%). Notably, some foods (eg, Bannock, salmon, fish eggs) were listed among both desired and not desired menu options.
Conclusion: Results showed that offering cultural or traditional foods on hospital menus is considered important by Indigenous people, and that a wide range of foods would be desired. Specific cultural foods to include on menus were salmon, traditional meats, or traditional teas. Foods not to include were also identified. Improving future nutrition care and services will require menu modifications to provide culturally safe options for Indigenous patients.
{"title":"Improving hospital nutrition care through \"Indigenous cultural safety\" of menu options: Results of a cross-sectional survey of Indigenous people in Western Canada.","authors":"Annalijn I Conklin, Derek Tian, Victoria Janzen, Alena Spears, Naomi Johnson, Caroline Kaufman, Sinead Feeney","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11352","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.11352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital nutrition services rarely offer Indigenous-specific menu options, an essential element of delivering \"Indigenous cultural safety\" in nutrition care to Indigenous patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Indigenous participants (n = 370) completed a semistructured Indigenous Food Ways survey (paper-based and online) from 2021 to 2022 as part of continuous healthcare quality improvement. Descriptive statistics summarized cultural/traditional foods respondents wanted to see or did not want to see as options on hospital menus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of respondents (83%) agreed that a menu option for cultural/traditional foods was important, with 716 unique items reported. Seafood and meat/alternatives were common cultural/traditional items for menu options, specifically salmon (22%), traditional meat (14%), moose (12%), and venison (12%). Grain items reported were mostly Bannock (22%). Nearly 20% of the sample listed traditional foods, medicine, or tea as options for hospital menus. Respondents identified 254 items they did not want to see on hospital menus, which were commonly energy-dense/processed foods (16%) or poorly prepared/flavored items (13%), as well as peas and carrots (7%). Notably, some foods (eg, Bannock, salmon, fish eggs) were listed among both desired and not desired menu options.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results showed that offering cultural or traditional foods on hospital menus is considered important by Indigenous people, and that a wide range of foods would be desired. Specific cultural foods to include on menus were salmon, traditional meats, or traditional teas. Foods not to include were also identified. Improving future nutrition care and services will require menu modifications to provide culturally safe options for Indigenous patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"266-277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779248/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144668108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-26DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70067
{"title":"Correction to \"ASPEN Position Paper: Recommendations for changes in commercially available parenteral multivitamin and multitrace element products\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70067","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70085
Albert Barrocas, Thomas G Baumgartner, Charles W Jastram
{"title":"\"I Never Heard of It…\".","authors":"Albert Barrocas, Thomas G Baumgartner, Charles W Jastram","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70085","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70085","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"331-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145757098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Patients with hemorrhagic stroke often have dysphagia and delayed oral feeding after extubation. Fewer than 33% of intensive care units (ICUs) implement swallow screens, with limited evidence-based early oral feeding protocols. We evaluated a nurse-administered "swallow screen and education" (SSE) program on oral feeding status, pneumonia incidence, and weight trajectory.
Methods: A pre-post intervention study with matched historical controls was conducted in a neurosurgical ICU. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with hemorrhagic stroke (aged ≥20 years) received the SSE program 24-h after extubation. Twenty-eight matched controls received the usual care. Outcomes included 24-h and 7-day nothing by mouth (NBM) rates, 30-day pneumonia incidence, and 4-week weight trajectory.
Results: The SSE group showed lower 24-h NBM rates vs controls (42.86% vs 78.57%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.063-0.661; P = 0.006). By day 7, differences persisted but were not statistically significant (28.57% vs 38.46%). The SSE group exhibited lower pneumonia incidence (3.57% vs 17.86%). After adjusting for confounders, SSE independently predicted reduced pneumonia risk (adjusted OR = 0.029; 95% CI, 0.001-0.708; P = 0.030). Weight decreased significantly in both groups (week 3: -2.681 kg, P < 0.001; week 4: -2.965 kg, P = 0.008).
Conclusion: Our preliminary findings suggest that the SSE program was associated with lower 24-h NBM rates after extubation and reduced pneumonia risk without affecting weight trajectories in this small hemorrhagic stroke cohort. This pragmatic intervention demonstrates potential clinical utility and scalability in neurosurgical ICUs. Future research should include larger randomized controlled trials with instrumental swallowing assessments while addressing weight loss in this vulnerable population.
背景:出血性卒中患者拔管后经常出现吞咽困难和口服喂养延迟。不到33%的重症监护病房(icu)实施吞咽筛查,采用的循证早期口服喂养方案有限。我们评估了一项由护士管理的“吞咽筛查和教育”(SSE)计划,内容涉及口服喂养状况、肺炎发病率和体重轨迹。方法:在神经外科ICU进行干预前后对照研究。连续28例出血性卒中患者(年龄≥20岁)在拔管后24小时接受SSE方案。28名匹配的对照组接受常规治疗。结果包括24小时和7天无口服(NBM)率、30天肺炎发生率和4周体重轨迹。结果:SSE组24小时NBM率低于对照组(42.86% vs 78.57%;优势比[OR] = 0.21;95% ci, 0.063-0.661;p = 0.006)。到第7天,差异仍然存在,但没有统计学意义(28.57% vs 38.46%)。SSE组肺炎发病率较低(3.57% vs 17.86%)。调整混杂因素后,SSE独立预测肺炎风险降低(调整OR = 0.029;95% ci, 0.001-0.708;p = 0.030)。结论:我们的初步研究结果表明,SSE计划与拔管后24小时NBM率降低和肺炎风险降低有关,而不影响这个小出血性卒中队列的体重轨迹。这种实用的干预在神经外科icu中显示了潜在的临床效用和可扩展性。未来的研究应该包括更大的随机对照试验,通过仪器吞咽评估来解决这些弱势群体的体重减轻问题。
{"title":"Swallow screen and education in patients following endotracheal extubation: A pre- and postintervention study.","authors":"Shih-Yi Lai, Li-Chan Lin, Yang-Hsin Shih, Shiao-Chi Wu, Yu-Chun Chang, Cheryl Chia-Hui Chen","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70001","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with hemorrhagic stroke often have dysphagia and delayed oral feeding after extubation. Fewer than 33% of intensive care units (ICUs) implement swallow screens, with limited evidence-based early oral feeding protocols. We evaluated a nurse-administered \"swallow screen and education\" (SSE) program on oral feeding status, pneumonia incidence, and weight trajectory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-post intervention study with matched historical controls was conducted in a neurosurgical ICU. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with hemorrhagic stroke (aged ≥20 years) received the SSE program 24-h after extubation. Twenty-eight matched controls received the usual care. Outcomes included 24-h and 7-day nothing by mouth (NBM) rates, 30-day pneumonia incidence, and 4-week weight trajectory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSE group showed lower 24-h NBM rates vs controls (42.86% vs 78.57%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.063-0.661; P = 0.006). By day 7, differences persisted but were not statistically significant (28.57% vs 38.46%). The SSE group exhibited lower pneumonia incidence (3.57% vs 17.86%). After adjusting for confounders, SSE independently predicted reduced pneumonia risk (adjusted OR = 0.029; 95% CI, 0.001-0.708; P = 0.030). Weight decreased significantly in both groups (week 3: -2.681 kg, P < 0.001; week 4: -2.965 kg, P = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary findings suggest that the SSE program was associated with lower 24-h NBM rates after extubation and reduced pneumonia risk without affecting weight trajectories in this small hemorrhagic stroke cohort. This pragmatic intervention demonstrates potential clinical utility and scalability in neurosurgical ICUs. Future research should include larger randomized controlled trials with instrumental swallowing assessments while addressing weight loss in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"278-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144775840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-28DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70040
Stacy L Pelekhaty, Raymond P Rector, Zhongjun J Wu, Alison Grazioli, Michael E Plazak, Bradley S Taylor, Bartley P Griffith, Aakash Shah, Deborah M Stein, Thomas M Scalea, Joseph Rabin
{"title":"Determining VO<sub>2</sub> in the ECMO Patient: Authors' reply.","authors":"Stacy L Pelekhaty, Raymond P Rector, Zhongjun J Wu, Alison Grazioli, Michael E Plazak, Bradley S Taylor, Bartley P Griffith, Aakash Shah, Deborah M Stein, Thomas M Scalea, Joseph Rabin","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70040","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70040","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"329-330"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145182001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-02DOI: 10.1002/ncp.70068
Stephen A McClave, Lauri Metzger, Lynn D Hiller, Sharon Siegel, Jennifer Katz, Robert G Martindale, Jennifer Van Dyke, Theresa Miranda, Brianna Hanson, Reilly Krason, Kara H Zirnheld, Ryan T Hurt
{"title":"Strategic documentation may enhance advanced nutrition support therapy practices.","authors":"Stephen A McClave, Lauri Metzger, Lynn D Hiller, Sharon Siegel, Jennifer Katz, Robert G Martindale, Jennifer Van Dyke, Theresa Miranda, Brianna Hanson, Reilly Krason, Kara H Zirnheld, Ryan T Hurt","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ncp.70068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"325-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145431640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}