Oncology最新文献

Introduction: Avelumab (Ave) is approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) maintenance therapy and prolongs overall survival (OS). We explored trends related to Ave treatment of mUC patients.

Methods: A total of 72 patients with mUC treated with first-line chemotherapy, from January 2019 to November 2022, at our affiliated institutions, were analyzed. We compared clinical parameters and the prognosis of patients treated with Ave (n = 43) because of progression during first-line chemotherapy, with untreated patients (Ave-untreated; n = 29). Among the Ave-treated group, we classified patients showing a complete or partial response or stable disease in their best response to Ave maintenance therapy as Ave-suitable patients; these were retrospectively analyzed. Potential prognostic factors, including the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) for determining patients suitable for Ave, were evaluated.

Results: The basic clinical parameters of patients when first-line treatment was initiated were not statistically different between the two groups. The Ave-suitable group (median 26.6 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.4-not reached [NR]) showed significantly longer median OS after first-line treatment than the Ave-untreated group (median 12.0 months, 95% CI: 7.5-NR) with tolerable adverse events. The cut-off values of prognostic factors were set by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Low age and GNRI sustainability were revealed as significant prognostic factors for being Ave-suitable both in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: In mUC, Ave maintenance prolonged OS within tolerable safety profiles. GNRI sustainability may be used as a biomarker to predict being Ave-suitable.

Introduction: In 2018, we reported the results of a study to assess the feasibility of applying the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria to Japanese patients with early-stage breast cancer (median follow-up, 3 years). Their results over the longer term can now be presented. Risk factors for axillary and locoregional recurrence in Z0011-eligible patients are unknown.

Methods: Long-term survival outcomes were investigated by analyzing data from patients enrolled in the feasibility study. Data from the feasibility study patients, and from patients eligible for the Z0011 strategy after its introduction into clinical practice, were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for axillary and locoregional recurrence.

Results: Regarding long-term outcomes for the feasibility study patients (n = 189), distant disease-free survival rates at 5 and 7 years were 90.4 ± 2.1% and 85.9 ± 2.6%, respectively, and overall survival rates at 5 and 7 years were 97.3 ± 1.2% and 95.3 ± 1.7%, respectively. Analysis of data from these patients plus the 93 who received Z0011 in clinical practice (total, n = 282) identified the following independent risk factors for axillary recurrence: absence of high axillary tangential irradiation (OR, 5.87 [95% CI, 1.09-31.35], p = 0.04) and number of positive sentinel lymph nodes (OR, 4.65 [95% CI, 1.11-19.48], p = 0.04). Only high Ki67 labeling index (OR, 5.92 [95% CI, 1.31-26.70], p = 0.02) was identified as an independent risk factor for locoregional recurrence.

Conclusion: Long-term survival outcome results of the feasibility study show that the Z0011 strategy can be used to treat Japanese patients with early-stage breast cancer. Our findings regarding risk factors suggest that high axillary tangent irradiation is necessary for the prevention of axillary recurrence and that irradiation, including of the regional lymph nodes, should be considered, especially in patients with high Ki67 index values.

Introduction: Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens.

Methods: A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared.

Results: Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015).

Conclusion: FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.

Introduction: Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) that significantly improve the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer include abiraterone acetate (androgen synthesis inhibitor) and enzalutamide (androgen receptor inhibitor). A recent analysis of ARPI and cardiovascular events using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) has been reported; however, the evidence on cardiovascular events for abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide in real-world clinical practice is insufficient. Using a large Japanese database of medical institutions, the Japanese Medical Data Center (JMDC) medical institution database (JMDC Inc., Tokyo, Japan), this study tested the hypothesis that the risk of cardiovascular events with enzalutamide is lower than that with abiraterone acetate.

Method: Using the JMDC medical institution database, patients with new use of abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide who had not experienced a major cardiovascular event between October 2014 and February 2022 were included. After adjusting for age, comorbidities, and concomitant medications using propensity score matching, cumulative incidence rates were compared for cardiovascular death and all cardiovascular events as the primary endpoints, and major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke as secondary endpoints.

Result: A total of 3,033 patients in the enzalutamide group and 2,021 in the abiraterone group met the eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, the cohort included 1,940 patients in the enzalutamide group and 1,940 patients in the abiraterone group. Enzalutamide was associated with significantly lower cumulative rates of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.93), all cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.98), major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64-0.97), and myocardial infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84) compared to abiraterone.

Conclusion: In a national sample of males with prostate cancer, those newly treated with enzalutamide had a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events than those treated with abiraterone acetate.

Introduction: Established biomarkers for predicting chemoradiotherapy efficacy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) are lacking. The inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), comprising serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels, can predict survival in advanced cancer. This study investigated whether metabolic and inflammatory markers, including the GPS, can predict the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in patients with LD-SCLC.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy for LD-SCLC at two institutions between April 2007 and June 2021, and assessed the prognostic significance of various metabolic and inflammatory markers. The GPS was calculated using the CRP and albumin concentrations, and categorized as follows: 0, CRP <1.0 mg/dL and albumin ≥3.5 mg/dL; 1, elevated CRP or decreased albumin; and 2, CRP ≥1.0 mg/dL and albumin<3.5 mg/dL. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazard models.

Results: The overall response rate was 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.6-97.9%). The median PFS and OS from chemoradiotherapy initiation were 12.6 (95% CI: 9.9-15.4) and 29.0 (95% CI: 24.8-45.5) months, respectively. The GPS demonstrated independent predictive ability for the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy, wherein favorable scores (GPS 0-1) were significantly correlated with superior PFS and OS compared to unfavorable scores (GPS 2: PFS: 14.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.0001; OS: 35.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This preliminary examination revealed that the GPS was significantly associated with PFS and OS in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for LD-SCLC, indicating its potential utility in assessing the therapeutic outcomes in LD-SCLC.

Background: Clinical decision-making in oncology is a complex process influenced by numerous disease-related factors, patient demographics, and logistical considerations. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), precision medicine is undergoing a shift toward more precise and personalized care. Wearable device technology complements this paradigm shift by offering continuous monitoring of patient vitals, facilitating early intervention, and improving treatment adherence. The integration of these technologies promises to enhance the quality of oncological care, making it more responsive and tailored to individual patient needs, thereby enabling wider implementation of such applications in the clinical setting.

Summary: This review article addresses the integration of wearable devices and AI in oncology, exploring their role in patient monitoring, treatment optimization, and research advancement along with an overview of completed clinical trials and utility in different aspects. The vast applications have been exemplified using several studies, and all the clinical trials completed till date have been summarized in Table 2. Additionally, we discuss challenges in implementation, regulatory considerations, and future perspectives for leveraging these technologies to enhance cancer care and radically changing the global health sector.

Key messages: AI is transforming cancer care by enhancing diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment planning tools, thus making precision medicine more effective. Wearable technology facilitates continuous, noninvasive monitoring, improving patient engagement and adherence to treatment protocols. The combined use of AI and wearables aids in monitoring patient activity, assessing frailty, predicting chemotherapy tolerance, detecting biomarkers, and managing treatment adherence. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data security, privacy, and the need for standardized devices persist. In the foreseeable future, wearable technology can hold significant potential to revolutionize personalized oncology care, empowering clinicians to deliver comprehensive and tailored treatments alongside standard therapy.

Introduction: The objective response rate to immunotherapy is limited in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, whose prognosis is still dismal. Few prognostic factors are clinically available, mostly related to patient or disease characteristics. Gene expression signatures offer better prognostic abilities but are mainly used in research. One such GE model classifies HNSCC into 6 clusters with different prognoses. Claudin-1 (CLDN1), which influences tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration, has emerged as a potential target, especially in cancers like HNSCC with high CLDN1 expression.

Methods: A single-center cohort of 100 loco-regionally advanced HNSCC patients from the BD2Decide observational study was analyzed. Patients were selected to balance long-term survivors and deceased patients, including HPV-negative and HPV-positive cases. Primary tumor specimens underwent GE analysis using Affymetrix ClariomD chips. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: The cohort comprised 100 HNSCC patients with a median age of 60 years, predominantly men (76%). Median OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were 94.24 and 42.79 months, respectively. CLDN1 expression varied significantly among primary sites, being highest in hypopharynx cancers. Differences in expression were not significant when stratified by HPV status or clinical stage. CLDN1 expression differed across the 6 transcriptomic clusters, with the highest levels in clusters associated with mesenchymal and hypoxic features. Higher CLDN1 expression correlated with shorter OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3, p = 0.0023) and DFS (HR: 2.14, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: CLDN1 expression is heterogeneous in HNSCC and carries prognostic significance. It is highest in tumors with HPV-like biology and hypoxic environments, and lowest in immune-sensitive clusters. High CLDN1 is a negative prognostic factor and a promising therapeutic target. Anti-CLDN1 treatments could improve outcomes of CLDN1+ HNSCC patients, and combination therapies with ICIs might overcome resistance in CLDN1- cases. These findings support the need for clinical studies on anti-CLDN1 therapies.

Introduction: Cisplatin (CDDP) often causes acute kidney injury (AKI), and magnesium supplementation has been suggested to be important in preventing CDDP-induced AKI. Sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution (BRS) is a crystalloid solution composed of various electrolytes, including Mg2+, and can be generally used to supplement missing extracellular fluid and correct metabolic acidosis; however, the clinical outcomes of hydration with BRS for CDDP-induced AKI remain unclear. In this study, we retrospectively compared the effects of BRS and normal saline for hydration in patients undergoing CDDP treatment.

Methods: We analyzed the incidence rate of AKI (grade ≥ 1), the severity of AKI, the serum magnesium level, and the incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities (leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia) following CDDP and fluorouracil (5-FU) administration in 131 in-patients who received CDDP and 5-FU for the first time to treat esophageal cancer.

Results: Fifty-six patients (43%) received saline alone, while 75 patients (57%) received BRS for hydration. The incidence rate of AKI (grade ≥ 1) was significantly lower in the BRS group (11%) than that in the saline group (39%, p < 0.001). Moreover, severe AKI (grade ≥ 2) was significantly less common in the BRS group than in the saline group. Although the serum magnesium levels before CDDP administration were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.939), the serum magnesium levels on days 2-3 after CDDP administration in the BRS group were significantly higher than those in the saline group (p < 0.001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of hematological toxicity between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that BRS use was an independent factor that significantly contributed to AKI prevention (odds ratio = 0.061, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Hydration with BRS could prevent CDDP-induced AKI in patients with esophageal cancer.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine differentiation is often found in colorectal cancer, but its impact on prognosis remains controversial. This study explored the association between neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in stage II/III colorectal cancer patients.

Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 3,441 stage II/III colorectal cancer patients were included for analysis. To verify neuroendocrine differentiation, immunohistochemistry was performed to explore the expression of chromogranin A and synaptophysin in colorectal cancer. In addition, the difference in overall survival between groups was analyzed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the clinicopathological characteristics significantly correlated with survival, and a Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify factors independently affecting overall survival prognosis. Furthermore, the findings were validated by the Gene Expression Omnibus database.

Results: Among the 3,441 stage II/III colorectal cancer patients, in comparison to patients with neuroendocrine differentiation (+), patients with neuroendocrine differentiation (+) had a poorer prognosis (p = 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate survival analysis of stage II cases revealed that tumor differentiation (p = 0.018), nerve invasion (p < 0.001), and neuroendocrine differentiation (+) (p = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with neuroendocrine differentiation (+) was similar to that of patients with high-risk factors in stage II cases (p = 0.639). High chromogranin A expression was correlated with poor prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer patients in the Gene Expression Omnibus database (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The prognosis of colorectal cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation (+) was poor, especially in stage II colorectal cancer patients. Neuroendocrine differentiation might be another high-risk factor for the prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer patients.