Open Heart最新文献

Background: Patients with heart failure exhibiting low systolic blood pressure (SBP) have a poor prognosis. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces cardiovascular events; however, its use in patients with low SBP has not been fully examined. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the association between baseline SBP and adverse events (AEs) in patients starting sacubitril/valsartan therapy using data from a real-world registry in Japan.

Methods: We analysed data from a multicentre retrospective study, including patients who initiated sacubitril/valsartan between August 2020 and August 2021. The patients were categorised into five groups based on their baseline SBP (<100, 100-109, 110-119, 120-129 and ≥130 mm Hg). The composite of AEs occurring within 3 months according to baseline SBP and the patient characteristics associated with AEs in a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg were analysed.

Results: Among the 964 patients newly prescribed sacubitril/valsartan, the median (IQR) age was 73 (61-80) years, and 388 (40.2%) patients had a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg. AEs occurred in 24% (n=232) of patients. The adjusted ORs for all AEs were 1.91 (95% CI (CI) 1.13-3.23; p=0.02) for the SBP <100 mm Hg group and 3.33 (95% CI 1.98 to 5.59; p<0.001) for the SBP 100-109 mm Hg group, compared with the SBP 110-119 mm Hg group. In patients with a baseline SBP <110 mm Hg, factors associated with an increased risk of AEs included a higher New York Heart Association class (II, III or IV) and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m².

Conclusions: Caution is needed when initiating sacubitril/valsartan in patients with lower baseline SBP. The severity of heart failure and kidney function may be useful for risk stratification in these high-risk patients.

Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is often associated with a concomitant aortopathy. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of the aortic valve (AV) phenotype on the rate of dilation of the aorta. This study aimed to compare the progression rate of aorta dimensions according to AV phenotype (BAV vs tricuspid AV (TAV)), fusion type and sex in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).

Methods: 310 patients with AS (224 TAV and 86 BAV) recruited in the Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis study (PROGRESSA, NCT01679431) were included in this analysis. Doppler echocardiography was performed annually to assess AS severity and measure ascending aorta (AA) dimensions. Baseline and last follow-up visit measurements were used to assess the annualised change.

Results: Median AA annualised change was larger in BAV versus TAV (0.33±0.65 mm/year vs 0.21±0.56 mm/year, p=0.04). In the whole cohort, BAV phenotype and higher low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels were significantly associated with fast progression of AA dilation in univariate analysis (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.98, p=0.02; 1.37, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.80, p=0.03, respectively). AA dilation rate did not vary according to the BAV subtype (p=0.142). Predictors of AA progression rate were different between valve phenotypes, with higher apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio, higher baseline peak aortic jet velocity (V_peak) and smaller baseline AA diameter in the TAV cohort (all p<0.05) versus absence of hypertension, higher LDL levels and smaller baseline AA diameter in the BAV cohort (all p<0.02). In men, higher baseline V_peak and smaller baseline AA (p<0.001) were independently associated with increased annualised AA dilation, while in women, higher LDL levels (p=0.026) were independently associated with faster AA dilation.

Conclusion: This study suggests that BAV is associated with faster dilation of the AA. Predictors of AA dilation are different between valve phenotype and sex, with higher LDL levels being associated with faster AA dilation in BAV.

Background: Despite tremendous therapeutic advancements, a significant proportion of coronary artery disease patients suffer from refractory angina pectoris, that is, quality-of-life-compromising angina that is non-manageable with established pharmacological and interventional treatment options. Adenoviral vascular endothelial growth factor-D^ΔNΔC (AdVEGF-D)-encoding gene therapy (GT) holds promise for the treatment of refractory angina.

Methods: ReGenHeart is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled and double-blinded phase 2 clinical trial that aims to study the safety and efficacy of intramyocardially administered angiogenic AdVEGF-D GT for refractory angina. Patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio and blocks of six to receive either AdVEGF-D or placebo. Primary endpoints are improvements in functional capacity assessed with the 6 min walking test and angina symptoms with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class after 6 month follow-up. Secondary endpoints are improvements in myocardial perfusion assessed with either positron emission tomography or single-photon emission CT after 6 month follow-up and functional capacity and angina symptoms after 12 months. In addition, changes in the quality of life, the use of angina medication and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events will be evaluated.

Conclusions: The phase 2 ReGenHeart trial will provide knowledge of the safety and efficacy of AdVEGF-D GT to ameliorate symptoms in refractory angina patients, extending and further testing positive results from the preceding phase 1/2a trial.

Background: The circadian variation pattern of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) occurred in Chinese community including both community healthcare centres and primary hospitals remains unknown. This study analysed the circadian variation of SCA in the Chinese community.

Methods: Data between 2018 and 2022 from the remote ECG diagnosis system of Xinhua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were analysed to examine the circadian rhythm of SCA, stratified by initial shockable (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) versus non-shockable (asystole or pulseless electrical activity) rhythm.

Results: Among 10 210 cases of SCA, major cases (8736, 85.6%) were non-shockable and 1474 (14.4%) cases were shockable. The circadian rhythm of SCA was as follows: peak time was from 08:00 to 11:59 (30.1%), while deep valley was from 00:00 to 03:59 (7.5%). The proportions of events by non-shockable and shockable events were similar and both reached their peak from 08:00 to 11:59, with a percentage of 29.0% and 36.4%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that the relative risk of shockable compared with non-shockable arrests was lower between 00:00 and 03:59 (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.97, p=0.028) and 04:00 to 07:59 (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.79, p<0.001), but higher between 08:00 and 11:59 (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.64, p=0.005).

Conclusions: In Chinese community, there is a distinct circadian rhythm of SCA, regardless of initial rhythms. Our findings may be helpful in decision-making, in that more attention and manpower should be placed on the morning hours of first-aid and resuscitation management in Chinese community.

Background: Implementation of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines in the UK has been repeatedly evaluated under the auspices of the British Cardiovascular Society in three Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (ASPIRE) surveys in 1994-1995, 2008-2010 and 2017-2019. The primary care arm of ASPIRE-2-PREVENT (A-3-P) was conducted to evaluate lifestyle and medical risk factor management in people at high risk of atherosclerotic CVD in everyday clinical practice.

Methods: A-3-P was a cross-sectional survey in 27 general practices and health centres across 5 English National Health Service regions. Patients with no history of atherosclerotic CVD started on blood pressure and/or lipid and/or glucose lowering treatments were identified retrospectively and interviewed at least 6 months after the initiation of medication.

Results: 557 patients attended the interview and examination (45.8% women; mean age 61.7±10.8 years). The risk factor control was poor: 9.3% of patients were smokers, 38.1% obese (body mass index≥30 kg/m²) and 53.5% centrally obese (waist circumference≥88 cm for women, ≥102 cm for men). Only 37.8% of patients on blood pressure-lowering therapies achieved the target of<140/90 mm Hg. Among treated dyslipidaemic patients, 59.5% reached the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target of <2.6 mmol/L. 62% of patients with self-reported diabetes mellitus attained the glycated haemoglobin target of <7.0%.

Conclusion: The results of A-3-P survey show that large proportions of people at high CVD risk have poor control of lifestiles and medical risk factors. There is considerable potential to raise the standards of preventive cardiology care by providing comprehensive, multidisciplinary prevention programmes addressing all aspects of risk factor management to reduce the total risk of future CVD.

Background: The benefit of patent foramen ovale closure (PFOC) ≤9 months after a cryptogenic stroke has been demonstrated in several randomised clinical trials. There is, however, insufficient data to support PFOC in non-recent cryptogenic strokes.

Aims: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of PFOC in relation to the time since the patient's most recent cryptogenic cerebrovascular event (CVE) or systemic embolism (SE).

Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study with international participation, to assess the results of an early closure (EC, <9 months) for secondary prevention versus a delayed closure (DC, ≥9 months). Recurrence of CVE/SE following PFOC was evaluated as the primary endpoint.

Results: 496 patients were included (65% in the EC and 35% in the DC group). With the exception of a larger defect size in the DC group (tunnel width 6 (4-14) vs 12 (6-16) mm, p=0.005), similar clinical and echocardiographic baseline features were observed between the groups. No differences were observed regarding the type of devices used for PFOC, procedural success rate (99.4 in EC vs 98.8% DC group) and periprocedural complications (2.1% vs 0.8%). Median follow-up was 2.0 (1.2-4.2) years in the whole study population. Recurrence of CVE/SE (3.9% vs 2.6%, p=0.443), death (1.4% vs 1.0%, p=0.697), residual shunt 12 months after PFOC, or antithrombotic treatment strategy were comparable in both groups during follow-up. A subanalysis comparing very delayed PFOC (≥24 months) also showed no differences in recurrence (4.2% in the <24-month vs 3.4% in the ≥24-month group, p=0.770).

Conclusion: Patients undergoing PFOC before and after 9 months after the index event had a comparable recurrence rate of CVE/SE. These findings suggest that PFOC might be recommended in cryptogenic CVE/SE which are more remote than 9 months.

Objective: Most patients who have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant do not receive life-prolonging therapy from it. Little research has been undertaken to determine which patients benefit the least from ICD therapy. As patients age and accumulate comorbidities, the risk of death increases and the benefit of ICDs diminishes. We sought to evaluate the impact of comorbidity, frailty, functional status on death with no prior appropriate ICD therapy.

Methods: A prospective, multicentre, observational study involving 12 English hospitals was undertaken. Patients were eligible for inclusion for the study if they were scheduled to have a de novo, upgrade to or replacement of a transvenous or subcutaneous ICD or cardiac resynchronisation therapy device and defibrillator (CRT-D). Baseline characteristics were collected. Participants were asked to complete a frailty assessment (Fried score) and a functional status questionnaire (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was calculated. Patients were prospectively followed up for 2.5 years. The primary outcome was death with no prior appropriate therapy.

Results: In total, 675 patients were enrolled, mean age 65.7 (IQR 65-75) years. A total of 63 patients (9.5%) died during follow-up, 58 without receiving appropriate ICD therapy. Frailty was present in 86/675 (12.7%) and severe comorbidity in 69/675 (10.2%). Multivariate predictors of death with no appropriate therapy were identified and a risk score comprising frailty, comorbidity, increasing age, estimated glomerular filtration rate and EQ-5D-5L was developed.

Conclusion: Comorbidities, frailty and the EQ-5D-5L score are powerful, independent predictors of death with no prior appropriate therapy in ICD/CRT-D recipients.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is not included in atrial fibrillation (AF) bleeding risk prediction scores, reflecting uncertainty regarding its importance as a risk factor for major haemorrhage. We aimed to report the relative risk of first major haemorrhage in people with HF and AF compared with people with AF without HF ('AF only').

Methods: English primary care cohort study of 2 178 162 people aged ≥45 years in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink from January 2000 to December 2018, linked to secondary care and mortality databases. We used traditional survival analysis and competing risks methods, accounting for all-cause mortality and anticoagulation.

Results: Over 7.56 years median follow-up, 60 270 people were diagnosed with HF and AF of whom 4996 (8.3%) had a major haemorrhage and 36 170 died (60.0%), compared with 8256 (6.4%) and 34 375 (27.2%), respectively, among 126 251 people with AF only. Less than half those with AF were prescribed an anticoagulant (45.6% from 2014 onwards), although 75.7% were prescribed an antiplatelet or anticoagulant. In a fully adjusted Cox model, the HR for major haemorrhage was higher among people with HF and AF (2.52, 95% CI 2.44 to 2.61) than AF only (1.87, 95% CI 1.82 to 1.92), even in a subgroup analysis of people prescribed anticoagulation. However, in a Fine and Gray competing risk model, the HR of major haemorrhage was similar for people with AF only (1.82, 95% CI 1.77 to 1.87) or HF and AF (1.71, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.78).

Conclusions: People with HF and AF are at increased risk of major haemorrhage compared with those with AF only and current prediction scores may underestimate the risk of haemorrhage in HF and AF. However, people with HF and AF are more likely to die than have a major haemorrhage and therefore an individual's expected prognosis should be carefully considered when predicting future bleeding risk.

Background: Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is associated with lower use of invasive management and increased mortality after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The reasons for this are unclear.

Methods: A retrospective clinical cohort study was performed using data from the English National Institute for Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative (2010-2017). Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate whether eGFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m² was associated with conservative ACS management and test whether (a) differences in care could be related to frailty and (b) associations between eGFR and mortality could be related to variation in revascularisation rates.

Results: Among 10 205 people with ACS, an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73m² was found in 25%. Strong inverse linear associations were found between worsening eGFR category and receipt of invasive management, on a relative and absolute scale. People with an eGFR <30 mL compared with ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m² were half as likely to receive coronary angiography (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.64) after non-ST-elevation (NSTE)-ACS and one-third as likely after STEMI (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.46), resulting in 15 and 17 per 100 fewer procedures, respectively. Following multivariable adjustment, the ORs for receipt of angiography following NSTE-ACS were 1.05 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.27), 0.98 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.26), 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.01) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.77) in eGFR categories 60-89, 45-59, 30-44 and <30, respectively. After STEMI, the respective ORs were 1.20 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.71), 0.77 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.24), 0.33 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.56) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.48) (p<0.001 for linear trends). ORs were unchanged following adjustment for frailty. A positive association between the worse eGFR category and 30-day mortality was found (test for trend p<0.001), which was unaffected by adjustment for frailty.

Conclusions: In people with ACS, lower eGFR was associated with reduced receipt of invasive coronary management and increased mortality. Adjustment for frailty failed to change these observations. Further research is required to explain these disparities and determine whether treatment variation reflects optimal care for people with low eGFR.

Trial registration number: NCT03507309.