Ophthalmology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen versus the pro re nata (PRN) regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with aflibercept, with or without adjunctive laser therapy.

Methods: Ninety-one eyes from 91 patients who were switched to aflibercept after three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of DME were included in this retrospective real-world study. The patients were categorized into three groups: TAE (n = 30), TAE + laser (n = 31), and PRN (n = 30). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular subfield thickness (CMST) at 12, 24, and 52 weeks were defined as the primary functional and anatomical outcomes.

Results: A total of 91 eyes from 91 patients (49.5% female) with a mean age of 63.9 ± 7.1 years were included in the analysis. At 52 weeks, the mean letter gains were 8.03, 8.90, and 10.23 in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. Anatomical improvements, as measured by CMST reduction, were 55.33 µm, 33.35 µm, and 48.96 µm in the TAE, TAE + laser, and PRN groups, respectively. The average number of injections administered was 7.7, 8.1, and 8.1, respectively. The final extension interval for the TAE group was 8.7 weeks, compared to 9.5 weeks in the TAE + laser group.

Conclusions: The PRN group demonstrated the highest functional improvement while the TAE group showed the greatest anatomical improvement. Overall, both anatomical and functional outcomes in the TAE regimen were comparable to the PRN regimen in patients with bevacizumab-resistant diabetic macular edema.

Introduction: This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) implantation with mitomycin C (MMC) applied by sub-tenon injection versus conventional application by MMC-soaked sponges.

Methods: This retrospective, 1-year cohort study included 100 eyes of 100 patients with glaucoma who underwent PMS implantation with MMC (0.4 mg/ml) delivered either by sub-tenon injection (50 eyes) or via soaked sponges (50 eyes). The primary outcome measure at 1 year was intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, with complete success defined as an IOP reduction of ≥ 20% and achieving a target IOP of ≤ 21 or 18 mmHg without the use of medication. Secondary outcomes, including corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) loss, the number of medications, and complications, were assessed and compared between the groups.

Results: Sustained reductions in mean IOP were observed in both groups over the 1-year follow-up, with no significant differences between the groups. The complete success rate, with a target IOP of ≤ 21 mmHg after 1 year, was 19.3% in the sponge group and 26.4% in the injection group. The qualified success rate was 59.0% and 87.4% in the sponge and injection groups, respectively. A longer survival rate was observed in the injection group than in the sponge group when IOP was below 21 mmHg. The mean CECD significantly decreased (P < 0.01) from baseline to each postoperative follow-up time point in both groups. At 1 year postoperatively, the percentage of total CECD loss was 8.1% in the sponge group and 8.0% in the injection group. However, no significant differences in mean CECD values, the number of medications, or adverse events were found between the groups.

Conclusions: PMS implantation with sub-tenon injection of MMC was comparable in terms of efficacy and safety to traditional MMC delivery via soaked sponges. However, the injection group demonstrated a significantly higher success rate than the sponge group.

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the ocular and systemic safety profiles of intravitreal biosimilar ranibizumab Ranieyes (Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Mumbai, India) in real-world clinical settings across multiple chorioretinal vascular diseases, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in adults.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, consecutive, interventional, uncontrolled multicenter study using data from three hospital networks in India. A total of 1401 eyes received 2194 injections of Ranieyes between June 2022 and November 2023. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months, and data on ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected and analyzed.

Results: The study population included 636 male patients and 533 female patients, with a mean age of 58.63 ± 11.54 years. The average number of injections per eye was 1.49 ± 0.23, with the highest frequency in the nAMD group (mean of 2.3 ± 0.23 injections per eye) over 6 months. Non-serious adverse events (nsAEs) were observed in 26.83% of injections, with mild ocular pain and transient blurring of vision being the most common. Serious ocular adverse events were rare, occurring in 0.85% of eyes, with retinal pigment epithelial tear (RPE TEAR) being the most frequent. Systemic adverse events were noted in 5.03% of patients, and all but one were non-serious. One patient developed non-fatal myocardial infarction, the causal relationship of which, however, was not established with the intravitreal agent used. No cases of endophthalmitis were observed.

Conclusions: This large-scale, real-world study demonstrates that Ranieyes is a safe intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent across various chorioretinal vascular diseases. The safety profile of Ranieyes is consistent with that of the reference product, making it a viable option in resource-constrained settings.

Introduction: Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition of the ocular surface, primarily treated with tear substitutes, which do not fully restore natural tear functions. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis that T-Lysyal (T-Lys) improves symptoms and signs in patients with DED. Additionally, we provide a literature overview on the effects of T-Lys in ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology conditions to elucidate its mechanisms of action.

Methods: A double-masked, randomized pilot study was conducted in patients with DED treated with T-Lys or hyaluronic acid (HA) 0.2% combined with tamarind seeds polysaccharide (control group) for 2 months. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of DED with symptoms lasting ≥ 6 months, Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) score ≥ 30, and at least one of the following: fluorescein staining of the cornea (score ≥ 3, NEI scale), conjunctival staining (Lissamine Green, score ≥ 3), or tear breakup time (T-BUT) ≤ 10 s. Data from the right eye were used for statistical analysis. A PubMed literature search of T-Lys studies was also performed without publication year restrictions.

Results: Twelve patients in the T-Lys group and 15 in the control group completed the study (mean age 67 ± 11 years). T-Lys treatment resulted in significant improvements from baseline (V0) to 2 months (V2) in symptoms assessed by visual analogue scale (T-Lys: 4.58 ± 2.57 mm at V0, 2.92 ± 1.38 mm at V2, p < 0.05; control: 5.13 ± 2.29 mm at V0, 5.3 ± 2.4 mm at V2), T-BUT (T-Lys: 2.58 ± 1.31 s at V0, 3.58 ± 1.37 s at V2, p < 0.05; control: 3.07 ± 1.43 s at V0, 3 ± 1.13 s at V2), and corneal staining (T-Lys: 2.16 ± 4.17 at V0, 1.41 ± 3.70 at V2, p < 0.05; control: 1.4 ± 2.19 at V0, 1.4 ± 2.16 at V2). No adverse events were reported. Literature findings supported T-Lys's efficacy in managing both ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology conditions.

Conclusion: This study provides the first clinical evidence of T-Lys efficacy in patients with DED, supporting preclinical data and highlighting its potential as a promising ocular surface modulator.

Trial registration: The study was registered in the ISRCTN registry for Clinical Studies with no. 13587929.

Introduction: Cataracts are a significant cause of blindness. While individuals frequently turn to the Internet for medical advice, distinguishing reliable information can be challenging. Large language models (LLMs) have attracted attention for generating accurate, human-like responses that may be used for medical consultation. However, a comprehensive assessment of LLMs' accuracy within specific medical domains is still lacking.

Methods: We compiled 46 commonly inquired questions related to cataract care, categorized into six domains. Each question was presented to the LLMs, and three consultant-level ophthalmologists independently assessed the accuracy of their responses on a three-point scale (poor, borderline, good) and their comprehensiveness on a five-point scale. A majority consensus approach established the final rating for each response. Responses rated as 'Poor' were prompted for self-correction and reassessed.

Results: For accuracy, ChatGPT-4o and Google Bard both achieved average sum scores of 8.7 (out of 9), followed by ChatGPT-3.5, Bing Chat, Llama 2, and Wenxin Yiyan. In consensus-based ratings, ChatGPT-4o outperformed Google Bard in the 'Good' rating. For completeness, ChatGPT-4o had the highest average sum score of 13.22 (out of 15), followed by Google Bard, ChatGPT-3.5, Llama 2, Bing Chat, and Wenxin Yiyan. Detailed performance data reveal nuanced differences in model capabilities. In the 'Prevention' domain, apart from Wenxin Yiyan, all other models were rated as 'Good'. All models showed improvement in self-correction. Bard and Bing improved 1/1 from 'Poor' to better, Llama improved 3/4, and Wenxin Yiyan improved 4/5.

Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the potential of LLMs, particularly ChatGPT-4o, to deliver accurate and comprehensive responses to cataract-related queries, especially in prevention, indicating potential for medical consultation. Continuous efforts to enhance LLMs' accuracy through ongoing strategies and evaluations are essential.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss among people of working age. However, people with diabetes are often unaware of the importance of DR screening for preserving vision, highlighting the importance of patient education about DR and DR-related ocular and systemic comorbidities. In this podcast, three patients with different stages of DR and two ophthalmologists exchanged their views on diagnosis, treatment, and progression of DR and diabetic macular edema. The discussion revealed that DR affects not only the physical aspects of patients' lives but also their mental wellbeing. The challenges of a DR diagnosis can be compounded by communication gaps that exist between patients, physicians, and the pharmaceutical industry. Development of new therapies is currently informed mainly by physician perspectives. However, the large burden of current treatments calls for new therapeutic approaches that meet patients' needs better. The preferred method of treatment administration can differ from patient to patient and the choices between treatments that necessitate repeated visits, monitoring, and at-home care must be discussed. As such, going forward it is crucial to consider both the physician and patient perspectives in shaping the clinical landscape of DR.

Introduction: Automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening using artificial intelligence has the potential to improve access to eye care by enabling large-scale screening. However, little is known about differences in real-world performance between available algorithms. This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of two AI screening platforms, IDx-DR and RetCAD, for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR).

Methods: Retinal images from 758 patients with diabetes were collected during screening from various clinics in Poland. Each patient was graded by three graders with 320 patients graded by Polish and 438 patients graded by Indian graders, with the majority decision serving as the reference standard. The images were evaluated independently by the IDx-DR and RetCAD algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and agreement between algorithms and human graders were calculated and statistically compared.

Results: IDx-DR demonstrated higher sensitivity of 99.3% but lower specificity of 68.9% for RDR detection compared to RetCAD which had 89.4% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity. The positive predictive value was higher for RetCAD (96.4% vs 48.1% for IDx-DR) while the negative predictive value was higher for IDx-DR (99.5% vs 83.1% for RetCAD). Both algorithms achieved high sensitivity (> 95%) for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy detection.

Conclusion: In this direct comparison using the same patient cohort, the two algorithms showed differences in their operating parameters for RDR screening. IDx-DR prioritized avoiding false negatives over false positives while RetCAD maintained a more balanced trade-off. These results highlight the variable performance of current artificial intelligence screening solutions and suggest the importance of considering algorithm performance metrics when deploying automated diabetic retinopathy screening programs, based on available healthcare resources.

Introduction: ABP 938 is being developed as a biosimilar to Eylea^® (aflibercept reference product [RP]), an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug used in the management of retinal diseases. Previously, a comparative analytical similarity assessment demonstrated that ABP 938 and aflibercept RP have the same amino acid sequence and exhibit similar higher-order structure and biological activity. The nonclinical studies described here were designed to assess the in vitro pharmacology and the in vivo pharmacokinetics (PK), toxicokinetics (TK), and safety profiles of ABP 938 compared to aflibercept RP.

Methods: In vitro target-binding kinetics and affinity for VEGF-A and placental growth factor (PIGF) isoforms were evaluated using surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Effector functions were assessed by cell-based assays. PK was evaluated in a nonterminal intravitreal (IVT) ocular distribution study in rabbits. Safety was assessed in a 1-month IVT study in cynomolgus monkeys.

Results: SPR results demonstrated that ABP 938 is similar to aflibercept RP in binding kinetics and affinity for VEGF-A₁₁₁, VEGF-A₁₂₁, VEGF-A₁₆₅, VEGF-A₁₈₉, PlGF-1, and PlGF-2 isoforms. No antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, or complement-dependent cytotoxicity was observed with ABP 938 and aflibercept RP. Results from the nonterminal ocular distribution study in rabbits indicated that there were no meaningful differences in the distribution kinetics between intravitreally injected ABP 938 and aflibercept RP. Additionally, there was no evidence of ocular or systemic toxicity associated with IVT administration of ABP 938 in a repeat-dose, 1-month toxicology study in cynomolgus monkeys; toxicokinetic and toxicology profiles were similar to aflibercept RP.

Conclusions: This integrated assessment of results from the in vitro pharmacology assessment and in vivo PK and TK/toxicology profiles formed the nonclinical portion of the totality of evidence demonstrating ABP 938 is a biosimilar to aflibercept RP.

Introduction: The needs of family caregivers providing care to relatives with visual impairment are often dismissed, leading to caregiver burden. The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) can measure the caregiver burden of caring for a family member with vision impairment. The purpose of this study is to validate the ZBI in Mexican family caregivers of patients with visual impairment.

Methods: The ZBI was applied to 137 family caregivers of patients with visual acuity ≤ 20/200 in the best eye for ≥ 6 months. The ZBI's reliability was determined using Cronbach's α and the factor structure using exploratory factor analysis (EFA, principal axis factoring with promax rotation). Items with loadings < 0.400 were eliminated. Retained factors were determined using the scree test and Horn's parallel analysis (95% CI). Associations between burden factors and other variables were evaluated with descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Mean ZBI score was 26.2 ± 13.1, and internal consistency was high (α = 0.871). EFA yielded four factors: (1) embarrassment and frustration, (2) self-efficacy expectations, (3) interference in personal relationships, and (4) personal strain. The α values ranged from 0.649 to 0.812. Spousal caregivers had significantly higher scores (factors 1, 2, and 4), whereas adult children had less scores (factor 3). There was a significant positive correlation between hours of daily caregiving and factors 2 (r = 0.350) and 3 (r = 0.388). A worse degree of visual impairment was associated with higher mean factor scores in all factors.

Conclusions: The ZBI is a valid instrument to detect burden in Mexican caregivers of patients with visual impairment. We identified a four-factor structure that improved our understanding of the ZBI's underlying constructs. Interventions targeting specific types of burden are warranted.

Introduction: In congenital aniridia caused by mutations in paired box 6 (PAX6), PAX6 influences the migration and differentiation of limbal epithelial cells (LECs), thereby playing a pivotal role in aniridia-associated keratopathy. The antidepressants ritanserin and duloxetine affect PAX6 expression in LECs. Limbal stromal cells, which support limbal epithelial stem cells, are crucial in the limbal stem cell niche. This study explores how ritanserin and duloxetine influence gene expression in primary human limbal stromal cells from subjects with congenital aniridia and from healthy subjects, in vitro.

Methods: Primary human limbal stromal cells from corneas affected by aniridia (AN-LSCs) (n = 8) and from healthy corneas (LSCs) (n = 8) were isolated and cultured in either low-glucose serum-free (LGSF) or normal-glucose serum-containing (NGSC) media. Cells were treated with 4 µM ritanserin or duloxetine for 24 h. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and western blot were used to assess the expression of PAX6, FOSL2, TGF-β1, ACTA2A1, LUM, COL1A1, COL5A1, DSG1, FABP5 and ADH7.

Results: In AN-LSCs with LGSF-medium, ritanserin increased PAX6 messenger RNA (mRNA) (p = 0.007) and decreased TGF-β1 and FOSL2 mRNA levels (P = 0.005, P = 0.038). In addition, TGF-β1 protein levels decreased with both treatments (P = 0.02, P = 0.007), and FABP5 protein level increased, using ritanserin (P = 0.019). In LSCs with LGSF-medium, ACTA2A1 mRNA levels decreased using ritanserin and duloxetine (P = 0.028; P = 0.031), while FABP5 mRNA levels increased with ritanserin treatment (P = 0.003). Also, duloxetine use reduced α-SMA protein (P = 0.013) and increased FABP5 protein levels (P = 0.029). In LSCs with NGSC-medium, ritanserin elevated LUM, FABP5 and ADH7 mRNA and protein levels (P = 0.025, P = 0.003, P = 0.047, P = 0.024, P = 0.013, P = 0.039).

Conclusions: The results of our study confirmed that the antipsychotropic drugs ritanserin and duloxetine alter PAX6 and TGF-β1 gene expression in AN-LSCs cultured in LGSF-medium. These drugs were found to have an impact on retinoic acid signaling pathways and keratocyte characteristic markers both in LSCs and AN-LSCs, using different culture media.