Ophthalmology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction: To assess the safety and efficacy of repeated intravitreal injections of RC28-E, a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial; 37 patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter scores between 73 and 34 were enrolled.

Methods: Treatment regimens consisted of a 3-month loading phase and a pro re nata (PRN) maintenance phase. This study included three treatment groups: the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg RC28-E groups, with escalating doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mg. Patients were evaluated monthly for 48 weeks. Safety was assessed based on ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetic characteristics, and the presence of anti-RC28-E antibodies. Efficacy was assessed using the mean change in BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to week 48.

Results: Most AEs were mild or moderate. The most common AE was a minor injection-related subconjunctival hemorrhage (16.2%). The AEs did not increase with dose or repeated injections. At week 48, mean improvements in BCVA from baseline in the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg groups were 6.1 ± 8.3, 9.9 ± 10.7, and 7.6 ± 9.38 letters, respectively; mean reductions in CST in the three groups were 112.1 ± 160.5, 175.1 ± 212.4, and 128.7 ± 145.8 μm, respectively. The serum RC28-E concentrations in 95% of the patients were below the quantification limit of the assay. No significant change from baseline was observed in the mean plasma concentrations of VEGF or FGF over the 48 weeks of treatment. Pre-treatment antibodies to RC28-E were detected in 1 of the 37 patients. Antibodies to RC28-E were detected in two patients after dosing with RC28-E for 48 weeks.

Conclusion: RC28-E was well tolerated and exhibited an overall favorable safety profile with evidence of improvements in BCVA and anatomical parameters.

Introduction: To evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation containing hexamidine diisethionate (HD) 0.05%, polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) 0.0001%, and edetate disodium (EDTA) 0.01% (Keratosept^®, Bruschettini, Genova, Italy) on the microbial flora of a healthy ocular surface.

Methods: Patients were enrolled consecutively. Each patient applied two drops of Keratosept^® in the eye scheduled for cataract surgery (study eye) three times daily in the 2 days prior to surgery and one time in the morning of surgery. The contralateral eyes were considered as control (control eye). Bilateral conjunctival swabs were collected before the first administration (T0) and the morning of surgery (T1). The swabs were processed within 3 h from sampling for the automated detection of the presence of replicating microorganisms (colony-forming units, CFU/mL) and the provision of real-time growth curves.

Results: Conjunctival swabs of 32 patients (n = 128) were examined. Six patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis because of microbial load < 50 CFU/mL at T0 in the study eye. No difference between study and control eyes was observed at T0 (p = 0.40). Compared with T0, 20 (76.9%) study eyes and 10 (38.5%) control eyes showed a ≥ 1 log reduction of the microbial load at T1, with a significant difference between groups (p = 0.005). Keratosept^® showed good tolerability, and no adverse events or eye discomfort were recorded.

Conclusions: This study showed that the low-dose combination of antiseptic agents in the Keratosept^® ophthalmic solution effectively reduces the bacterial load of healthy flora on the ocular surface.

Objectives: To determine whether the types and rates of post-surgical complications associated with the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) are comparable with those reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera.

Methods: Systematic literature reviews were conducted to determine the long-term (≥ 18-month) safety of ocular implants that cross the sclera in clinical trials and real-world studies. Complication types and rates were compared with those reported for the PDS in phase III clinical trials (Archway, Pagoda, and Pavilion).

Results: Sixteen clinical trials (24 publications) and 43 real-world studies were identified reporting 30 complications in eyes with 15 implant types and 8 ocular diseases. Implants were associated with an acceptable, well-characterized safety profile, with most complications resolving spontaneously or with treatment. Device-related complications were reported in 0.7% (0.0-5.0%) of study eyes in clinical trials and 1.3% (0.0-14.5%) of eyes in real-world studies. Rates of conjunctival complications were 2.1% (0.0-22.8%) and 2.2% (0.9-4.6%), respectively. The overall types and rates of adverse events of special interest reported for the PDS in phase III trials (cataract, conjunctival bleb, vitreous hemorrhage, conjunctival erosion, conjunctival retraction, endophthalmitis, implant dislocation, retinal detachment, and hyphema) were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants.

Conclusions: The rates of complications reported in phase III clinical trials for the PDS were within the ranges reported for other ocular implants that cross the sclera. This suggests that the long-term safety of the PDS is consistent with other ocular devices established in ophthalmology clinical practice.

Trial registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: CRD5202234129, CRD42022343129.

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze corneal sensitivity with a new noncontact and handheld esthesiometer (Brill Engines, Spain) in patients with dry eye disease (DED) and patients on hypotensive drops, and to compare it with healthy subjects.

Methods: A total of 31 patients (57 eyes) with DED, 23 patients (46 eyes) with glaucoma, and 21 healthy patients (33 eyes) were recruited. In all patients, corneal sensitivity was measured. Subsequently, a keratography test (Keratograph 5M, Oculus) was carried out to measure tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT), bulbar redness (Jenvis scale), and corneal staining (CS, Oxford scale). Both corneal sensitivity and ocular surface parameters were compared between DED, glaucoma, and healthy subjects. Linear mixed models were constructed to utilize data from both eyes of patients. An alpha level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age was 56.1 ± 16.1 years in the DED group, 69.5 ± 11.7 years in the glaucoma group, and 37.190 ± 11.677 years in the control group. After adjustment for age and sex, corneal sensitivity was significantly reduced in DED and glaucoma vs control group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.009, respectively). NIBUT was lower in DED and glaucoma groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Redness and CS values were higher in the DED group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.001, respectively). TMH was lower in the glaucoma group (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Corneal sensitivity measured with a novel noncontact esthesiometer was reduced in DED and glaucoma groups compared to controls. In clinical practice, this esthesiometer could be an easy-to-use device to screen for patients with subclinical neurotrophic keratopathy.

Introduction: Highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) is often associated with a poor prognosis, and there is currently no optimal treatment. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), an autologous blood product, has been shown to promote tissue regeneration. This prospective, randomized, controlled study investigated the efficacy of conventional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus PRF membrane transplantation in highly myopic MHRD.

Methods: Eyes with highly myopic MHRD were randomly assigned to either a conventional ILM peeling group (IP group, n = 19) or a PRF membrane transplantation group (PMT group, n = 21). The study followed participants for a period of 6 months. The primary outcome measure was macular hole (MH) closure assessed using optical coherence tomography. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), superficial vascular density (SVD), deep vascular density (DVD), rate of retinal reattachment, and any complications encountered.

Results: MH closure was achieved in a significantly greater proportion of eyes in the PMT group (21/21, 100.00%) compared to the IP group (15/19, 78.95%) (P = 0.042). Retinal reattachment was accomplished in all patients (100.00%) within both groups. Except for an insignificant difference in BCVA observed at 1 week post-surgery in the IP group, significant improvements in BCVA and CRT were documented in both groups across all other post-operative time points. Final BCVA (P = 0.040), CRT (P = 0.002), SVD (P = 0.002), and DVD (P = 0.013) were all significantly higher in the PMT group compared to the IP group. No serious complications were identified in either group.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the superiority of PRF membrane transplantation compared to conventional ILM peeling in promoting MH closure and enhancing retinal vascular density in patients with highly myopic MHRD. Additionally, PRF membrane transplantation effectively restores retinal reattachment, improves visual function, and increases retinal thickness without introducing additional complications.

Trial registration number: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov , NCT06200727.

Introduction: This study reports our experiences with systematic retinal screening in Denmark through optometrists with access to tele-ophthalmological services before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We evaluated an optometrist-based retinal screening system with a referral option for tele-ophthalmological service by a consultant ophthalmologist within the time period of August 1, 2018 to September 30, 2023. The optometrist collected patient history, refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, basic slit-lamp examination, 4-in-1 visual field report, and retinal imaging using color fundus 45° photography. Tele-ophthalmological services were provided by consultant ophthalmologists. Within pre-defined periods of pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19, we evaluated the rate of referrals to the tele-ophthalmological service, diagnoses made, and referrals to the public healthcare system.

Results: A total of 1,142,028 unique individuals, which corresponded to 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark, underwent screening by the optometrists; 50,612 (4.4%) of these individuals were referred to the tele-ophthalmological examination by consultant ophthalmologists. A referral for further ophthalmic examination, either at hospital or at an ophthalmic practice, was made for 10,300 individuals (20.4% of those referred for tele-ophthalmology, corresponding to 0.9% of the population screened). The referral rate from the screening to the tele-ophthalmological service increased from before COVID-19 (3.4%) to during COVID-19 (4.3%) and further after COVID-19 (6.4%). This increase coincided with an increasing prevalence of conditions seen in the tele-ophthalmological service.

Conclusion: During a period of 5 years, 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark underwent retinal screening. This provided an adjunctive health service during a period of severe strain on the public healthcare system, while limiting the number of excessive referrals to the public healthcare system. Temporal trends illustrated an increased pattern of use of a large-scale tele-ophthalmological system.

Introduction: This study was conducted to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) treatment effect of the slow-eluting (SE) travoprost intracameral implant to the IOP treatment effect of topical prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy in a subgroup of subjects who were on pre-study PGA monotherapy prior to enrollment in the two pivotal phase 3 trials of the travoprost intracameral implant.

Methods: A combined study population of 133 subjects from two phase 3 trials, who were on topical PGA monotherapy at screening, subsequently underwent a washout period from their topical PGA, and then were randomized and administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant. The subjects were analyzed for the IOP treatment effects of the pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the in-study SE travoprost intracameral implant. Paired t-tests were used to compare the difference in screening minus post-washout baseline IOP versus month 3 minus post-washout baseline IOP. The IOP-lowering efficacy in eyes administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant was compared to the IOP lowering in the same eyes while on a topical PGA monotherapy prior to study entry.

Results: Pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated IOP treatment effects of -5.76 mmHg and -7.07 mmHg, respectively. The IOP-lowering treatment effect was significantly greater by 1.31 mmHg for the SE travoprost intracameral implant relative to pre-study PGA monotherapy (95% confidence interval: -2.01, -0.60; P = 0.0003).

Conclusions: The SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated superior IOP-lowering treatment effect versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy with a superiority margin that was both statistically significant and clinically meaningful. The greater IOP reduction from baseline while on the SE implant versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy may be a reflection of the optimized adherence and continuous elution of PGA therapy into the anterior chamber achieved with the SE travoprost intracameral implant.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03519386 and NCT03868124.

Introduction: Dichoptic training has emerged as a promising rehabilitation approach for improving binocular visual function in patients with strabismus. A prospective observational study design was employed to assess the effectiveness of online video game-based dichoptic training in rehabilitating binocular visual function in patients who had undergone an operation for intermittent exotropia.

Methods: A total of 64 patients who had undergone an operation for intermittent exotropia were recruited and divided into the training group and the control group based on whether they would receive the dichoptic training. The dichoptic training was conducted for 3 months in the training group and the control group would not accept any form of orthoptic therapy. Assessments of binocular visual functions and deviation were conducted at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up.

Results: Twenty-nine participants in the training group (mean 9.69 ± 2.66 years old) and 26 participants in the control group (mean 8.41 ± 2.64 years old) completed follow-up. At both 3- and 6-month follow-ups, the training group showed superior distance stereopsis compared to the control group, with near stereopsis only showing significant difference at the 6-month follow-up. Additionally, the training group exhibited significantly less distance exo-deviation drift than the control group at these times, and no significant difference was observed in near exo-deviation drift between the groups. The control group had a significantly higher rate of suboptimal surgical outcomes at both the 3- and 6-month follow-up. However, no significant differences were observed in simultaneous perception and fusion functions between the two groups.

Conclusions: Online video game-based dichoptic training has the potential to become a novel postoperative rehabilitation strategy for patients with intermittent exotropia.

This is a summary of the original article ‟Cost‑Effectiveness of Faricimab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO): A UK Analysis". DMO, a serious eye condition that can lead to vision loss in people with diabetes, is a significant health concern and a lack of knowledge exists about the cost-effectiveness (the balance of a treatment's cost and its effectiveness) of new treatments. This research assessed the cost-effectiveness of a new medication named faricimab, using a mathematical model that simulated the progression of DMO and its treatment over 25 years. The model compared faricimab against relevant therapeutic alternatives for DMO in the UK, including ranibizumab, aflibercept, and bevacizumab. The research discovered that faricimab could offer improved vision results and be cost saving or cost-effective. It also suggested that faricimab could lessen the strain on healthcare services due to its less frequent dosing schedule. Overall, such findings suggest that faricimab is a promising new treatment option for DMO that could benefit patients and the healthcare system. This could have implications for future treatment guidelines and the management of DMO in clinical practice.