Pub Date : 2025-02-06eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70037
Jasmine Gulati, Anuja Shah, Veranca Shah, Thomas Haupt, Amanda Walsh, Jessica H Maxwell
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the rate at which veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received care adhering to National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) guidelines for postoperative radiation and to identify factors associated with non-adherence. The guidelines recommend initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery.
Study design: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of a pre-existing database.
Setting: This study, performed at the DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, identified patients with HNSCC who underwent surgery with curative intent followed by adjuvant radiation ± chemotherapy between 1991 and 2021.
Methods: Variables assessed included patient demographics, cancer stage and site, treatment type, dates of treatment initiation and completion, and adherence to the NCCN guidelines for PORT initiation. Fisher exact test was used to identify factors associated with delays >6 weeks.
Results: Among the 132 veterans identified, 72 (54.5%) underwent surgery followed by adjuvant PORT. Only 18 veterans (25%) started radiation within 6 weeks of surgery. Patients who underwent a neck dissection at the time of the index surgery (P = .028), dental extraction (P = .032), or gastrostomy tube placement (P = .041) were more likely to experience delays.
Conclusion: Only 25% of veterans initiated PORT within 6 weeks. Identifying causes of delays provides an important step in addressing discrepancies between guideline-directed care and actual care delivered. Development of efficient care pathways to increase guideline-congruent initiation of PORT should be considered.
{"title":"Delivery of Timely Adjuvant Radiation Among Veterans With Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Jasmine Gulati, Anuja Shah, Veranca Shah, Thomas Haupt, Amanda Walsh, Jessica H Maxwell","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine the rate at which veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) received care adhering to National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) guidelines for postoperative radiation and to identify factors associated with non-adherence. The guidelines recommend initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort analysis of a pre-existing database.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study, performed at the DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, identified patients with HNSCC who underwent surgery with curative intent followed by adjuvant radiation ± chemotherapy between 1991 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Variables assessed included patient demographics, cancer stage and site, treatment type, dates of treatment initiation and completion, and adherence to the NCCN guidelines for PORT initiation. Fisher exact test was used to identify factors associated with delays >6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 132 veterans identified, 72 (54.5%) underwent surgery followed by adjuvant PORT. Only 18 veterans (25%) started radiation within 6 weeks of surgery. Patients who underwent a neck dissection at the time of the index surgery (<i>P</i> = .028), dental extraction (<i>P</i> = .032), or gastrostomy tube placement (<i>P</i> = .041) were more likely to experience delays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 25% of veterans initiated PORT within 6 weeks. Identifying causes of delays provides an important step in addressing discrepancies between guideline-directed care and actual care delivered. Development of efficient care pathways to increase guideline-congruent initiation of PORT should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143365480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70086
Anika S Walia, Roy Xiao, Daphne T Hao, Vinay K Rathi, Rosh K V Sethi, Stacey T Gray
While outpatient otolaryngology procedures have been increasingly performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), the cost differences compared to hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) remain unclear. Utilizing newly available data collected from Turquoise Health's Rate Sense as required under the Transparency in Coverage rule, we assess, in this cross-sectional analysis, the differences in negotiated facility fees between ASCs and HOPDs for 20 common otolaryngologic procedures. Analyzing data from 4613 ASCs and 2382 hospitals, we found significantly higher facility fees at HOPDs, with a median relative price difference of +146% (P < .0001). This may be explained by greater infrastructure costs and market power differences between facilities. Our findings suggest that further shifting outpatient otolaryngology procedures toward ASCs could yield substantial cost reductions across health care systems. Additional research is needed to ensure safe and cost-effective patient selection for ASCs.
{"title":"Differences in Negotiated Facility Fees for Otolaryngology Procedures at Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Hospitals.","authors":"Anika S Walia, Roy Xiao, Daphne T Hao, Vinay K Rathi, Rosh K V Sethi, Stacey T Gray","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70086","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While outpatient otolaryngology procedures have been increasingly performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), the cost differences compared to hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) remain unclear. Utilizing newly available data collected from Turquoise Health's Rate Sense as required under the Transparency in Coverage rule, we assess, in this cross-sectional analysis, the differences in negotiated facility fees between ASCs and HOPDs for 20 common otolaryngologic procedures. Analyzing data from 4613 ASCs and 2382 hospitals, we found significantly higher facility fees at HOPDs, with a median relative price difference of +146% (<i>P</i> < .0001). This may be explained by greater infrastructure costs and market power differences between facilities. Our findings suggest that further shifting outpatient otolaryngology procedures toward ASCs could yield substantial cost reductions across health care systems. Additional research is needed to ensure safe and cost-effective patient selection for ASCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783682/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70084
Zainab Farzal, Kelli M Sullivan, Maimoona A Zariwala, Brian D Thorp, Brent A Senior, Charles S Ebert, Stephanie Davis, Margaret W Leigh, Michael R Knowles, Adam J Kimple
Objective: Individuals with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) frequently report olfactory dysfunction, yet this deficit is poorly documented. The purpose of this study was to characterize the presence and degree of olfactory dysfunction in PCD compared to controls and determine whether certain PCD genes are associated with worse olfaction.
Study design: A prospective cohort study.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Methods: We administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) to individuals with PCD. Participants were divided into 3 age groups (15-29 years, 30-44 years, and 45+ years) and compared to age- and sex-matched normal controls (n = 2170).
Results: Twenty-nine individuals with PCD (8 males and 21 females) met the criteria (median age: 38 years; interquartile range: 22-47). Only 27.6% of patients with PCD had UPSIT scores within the normosmia range. The UPSIT median scores of each PCD age group were significantly lower than the median scores of the controls (P < .0001 for each age group). UPSIT scores generally worsened with age: mean 33 (mild hyposmia) for 15 to 29 years, 26.8 (moderate hyposmia) for 30 to 44 years, and 20.9 (severe hyposmia) for 45+ years. The most common genes coded were absent inner dynein arm/microtubule disorientation (IDA/MTD) defect (11/24, 45.8%), followed by absent outer dynein arm defect (8/24, 33.3%). The CCDC39 gene (IDA/MTD) was associated with worse olfactory dysfunction.
Conclusion: Individuals with PCD have a substantially higher prevalence and degree of olfactory dysfunction compared to age-matched controls. Our study is the first to report greater olfactory dysfunction with age in PCD patients, highlighting an important area for research.
{"title":"Olfactory Dysfunction in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia.","authors":"Zainab Farzal, Kelli M Sullivan, Maimoona A Zariwala, Brian D Thorp, Brent A Senior, Charles S Ebert, Stephanie Davis, Margaret W Leigh, Michael R Knowles, Adam J Kimple","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70084","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Individuals with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) frequently report olfactory dysfunction, yet this deficit is poorly documented. The purpose of this study was to characterize the presence and degree of olfactory dysfunction in PCD compared to controls and determine whether certain PCD genes are associated with worse olfaction.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) to individuals with PCD. Participants were divided into 3 age groups (15-29 years, 30-44 years, and 45+ years) and compared to age- and sex-matched normal controls (n = 2170).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine individuals with PCD (8 males and 21 females) met the criteria (median age: 38 years; interquartile range: 22-47). Only 27.6% of patients with PCD had UPSIT scores within the normosmia range. The UPSIT median scores of each PCD age group were significantly lower than the median scores of the controls (<i>P</i> < .0001 for each age group). UPSIT scores generally worsened with age: mean 33 (mild hyposmia) for 15 to 29 years, 26.8 (moderate hyposmia) for 30 to 44 years, and 20.9 (severe hyposmia) for 45+ years. The most common genes coded were absent inner dynein arm/microtubule disorientation (IDA/MTD) defect (11/24, 45.8%), followed by absent outer dynein arm defect (8/24, 33.3%). The <i>CCDC39</i> gene (IDA/MTD) was associated with worse olfactory dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with PCD have a substantially higher prevalence and degree of olfactory dysfunction compared to age-matched controls. Our study is the first to report greater olfactory dysfunction with age in PCD patients, highlighting an important area for research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783683/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143080686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-27eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70083
David W Jang, Avivah J Wang, Ralph Abi Hachem, Bradley J Goldstein, David L Witsell, Frederick Godley, Rong Jiang
Objective: This study aims to characterize concurrent nasal symptoms in a cohort of patients with non-rhinogenic headache (NRH) presenting to an otolaryngology clinic.
Study design: A prospective cohort.
Setting: Single tertiary care institution.
Methods: Adults with NRH were recruited over a 2-year period (February 2021 to February 2023). Patients were eligible if they endorsed midfacial pain or pressure for at least 10 days a month over the previous 3 months and had no evidence of rhinosinusitis on both nasal endoscopy and computed tomography imaging. Study participants used a mobile application to keep a daily log of their facial pain/pressure, nasal congestion, and nasal mucus/discharge. Symptom severity was scored on a scale from 1 (none) to 10 (worst) for 30 consecutive days. Repeated measures correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate overall or common intra-individual association for each symptom.
Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, and they completed the 30-day symptom log. Median (range) scores were 5 (1-10), 4 (1-10), and 2 (1-10) for facial pain/pressure, congestion, and mucus, respectively. Patients had significant day-to-day fluctuations in scores for all 3 symptoms, with a significant positive correlation between symptoms: congestion/mucus (r = 0.74181, P < .0001), congestion/facial pain (r = 0.5873, P = .001), and mucus/facial pain (r = 0.49384, P = .0076).
Conclusion: Patients with NRH often have concurrent nasal symptoms. Moreover, nasal congestion, mucus, and facial pain/pressure had significant correlations in day-to-day fluctuations in severity. Our findings suggest the possibility that all three symptoms share a common pathophysiology.
{"title":"Concurrent Nasal Symptoms in Non-Rhinogenic Headache.","authors":"David W Jang, Avivah J Wang, Ralph Abi Hachem, Bradley J Goldstein, David L Witsell, Frederick Godley, Rong Jiang","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70083","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to characterize concurrent nasal symptoms in a cohort of patients with non-rhinogenic headache (NRH) presenting to an otolaryngology clinic.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary care institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with NRH were recruited over a 2-year period (February 2021 to February 2023). Patients were eligible if they endorsed midfacial pain or pressure for at least 10 days a month over the previous 3 months and had no evidence of rhinosinusitis on both nasal endoscopy and computed tomography imaging. Study participants used a mobile application to keep a daily log of their facial pain/pressure, nasal congestion, and nasal mucus/discharge. Symptom severity was scored on a scale from 1 (none) to 10 (worst) for 30 consecutive days. Repeated measures correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate overall or common intra-individual association for each symptom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were enrolled, and they completed the 30-day symptom log. Median (range) scores were 5 (1-10), 4 (1-10), and 2 (1-10) for facial pain/pressure, congestion, and mucus, respectively. Patients had significant day-to-day fluctuations in scores for all 3 symptoms, with a significant positive correlation between symptoms: congestion/mucus (<i>r</i> = 0.74181, <i>P</i> < .0001), congestion/facial pain (<i>r</i> = 0.5873, <i>P</i> = .001), and mucus/facial pain (<i>r</i> = 0.49384, <i>P</i> = .0076).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with NRH often have concurrent nasal symptoms. Moreover, nasal congestion, mucus, and facial pain/pressure had significant correlations in day-to-day fluctuations in severity. Our findings suggest the possibility that all three symptoms share a common pathophysiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770469/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-26eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70080
Iulian Filipov, Lucian Chirila, Mihai Sandulescu, Gheorghe Cristache, Corina Marilena Cristache
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of electro-pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy for the treatment of salivary gland stones.
Study design: A prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with obstructive salivary gland syndrome, where basket-assisted sialendoscopy alone failed to remove the calculi.
Setting: This study was conducted at the "Queen Maria" Military Hospital in Brașov, Romania, and a private practice, between February 2023 and May 2024.
Methods: A total of 29 patients with salivary calculi were treated using the SialoLither device (Hidromed), which operates on the electro-pneumatic principle. The number of sessions required for complete stone removal, the duration of each session, and the number of ballistic impulses applied were recorded. Statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney U test and multiple linear regression, were conducted to assess the relationship between stone size, location, and treatment outcomes.
Results: Complete removal was achieved in 72.4% of patients after a single session, with 100% success after 3 sessions. The average number of impulses was 13.9 (±4.25), with no significant difference in outcomes between the parotid and submandibular glands (P > .05). The total duration varied, with a mean time of 89.97 (±54.89) minutes. Complications were minimal, with only 2 cases of minor epithelial damage.
Conclusion: Electro-pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy is a highly effective, minimally invasive technique for managing salivary calculi, offering a safe and efficient alternative to traditional surgical methods.
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Outcomes of Electro-Pneumatic Intracorporeal Lithotripsy in the Management of Sialolithiasis.","authors":"Iulian Filipov, Lucian Chirila, Mihai Sandulescu, Gheorghe Cristache, Corina Marilena Cristache","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70080","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of electro-pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy for the treatment of salivary gland stones.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with obstructive salivary gland syndrome, where basket-assisted sialendoscopy alone failed to remove the calculi.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at the \"Queen Maria\" Military Hospital in Brașov, Romania, and a private practice, between February 2023 and May 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 29 patients with salivary calculi were treated using the SialoLither device (Hidromed), which operates on the electro-pneumatic principle. The number of sessions required for complete stone removal, the duration of each session, and the number of ballistic impulses applied were recorded. Statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and multiple linear regression, were conducted to assess the relationship between stone size, location, and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete removal was achieved in 72.4% of patients after a single session, with 100% success after 3 sessions. The average number of impulses was 13.9 (±4.25), with no significant difference in outcomes between the parotid and submandibular glands (<i>P</i> > .05). The total duration varied, with a mean time of 89.97 (±54.89) minutes. Complications were minimal, with only 2 cases of minor epithelial damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Electro-pneumatic intracorporeal lithotripsy is a highly effective, minimally invasive technique for managing salivary calculi, offering a safe and efficient alternative to traditional surgical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143047608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-19eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70076
Salman Hussain, Jafar Hayat, Raisa Chowdhury, Mahmoud Ebrahim, Abdulmohsen Alterki, Ahmed Bahgat, Ahmed A Al-Sayed, Vikram Padhye, Robson Capasso
Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety profile of coblation tongue base reduction (CBTR) compared to radiofrequency base of tongue (RFBOT) reduction on sleep-related outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases.
Review methods: Literature search by 2 independent authors was conducted using the abovementioned databases. Studies on CBTR and RFBOT as part of OSA treatment in adult patients with pre- and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were included. Direct meta-analysis and single-arm meta-analysis were conducted to compare sleep-related outcomes (AHI, apnea index [AI], surgical success rates, Epworth sleepiness score [ESS], SpO2, body mass index [BMI], and visual analog scale [VAS]) between both groups.
Results: A total of 40 studies with a total of 1940 patients were included, of which 1440 individuals who underwent tongue base reduction interventions (RF = 306, RF + UPPP = 656, and coblation + UPPP = 482) met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed significant improvements in AHI (CBTR = -22.84, RFBOT = -11.14), AI (CBTR = 15.64, RFBOT = -5.26), ESS (CBTR = -7.59, RFBOT = -7.18), mean oxygen saturation (CBTR = 7.43, RFBOT = 4.25), mean BMI (CBTR = -0.69, RFBOT = -4.09), and snoring visual analog scale (CBTR = -16.20, RFBOT = -18.21). Surgical success rate (postoperative AHI < 20 and drop >50% from baselines) was 70% for CBTR and 43% for RFBOT.
Conclusion: Both interventions decreased sleep-related outcomes in adult patients with OSA. Coblation appears to exhibit superiority over radiofrequency with a similar safety profile. However, further studies with direct comparisons between both interventions must be performed.
{"title":"Coblation Versus Radiofrequency for Tongue Base Reduction in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Salman Hussain, Jafar Hayat, Raisa Chowdhury, Mahmoud Ebrahim, Abdulmohsen Alterki, Ahmed Bahgat, Ahmed A Al-Sayed, Vikram Padhye, Robson Capasso","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70076","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety profile of coblation tongue base reduction (CBTR) compared to radiofrequency base of tongue (RFBOT) reduction on sleep-related outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Literature search by 2 independent authors was conducted using the abovementioned databases. Studies on CBTR and RFBOT as part of OSA treatment in adult patients with pre- and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were included. Direct meta-analysis and single-arm meta-analysis were conducted to compare sleep-related outcomes (AHI, apnea index [AI], surgical success rates, Epworth sleepiness score [ESS], SpO<sub>2</sub>, body mass index [BMI], and visual analog scale [VAS]) between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 40 studies with a total of 1940 patients were included, of which 1440 individuals who underwent tongue base reduction interventions (RF = 306, RF + UPPP = 656, and coblation + UPPP = 482) met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed significant improvements in AHI (CBTR = -22.84, RFBOT = -11.14), AI (CBTR = 15.64, RFBOT = -5.26), ESS (CBTR = -7.59, RFBOT = -7.18), mean oxygen saturation (CBTR = 7.43, RFBOT = 4.25), mean BMI (CBTR = -0.69, RFBOT = -4.09), and snoring visual analog scale (CBTR = -16.20, RFBOT = -18.21). Surgical success rate (postoperative AHI < 20 and drop >50% from baselines) was 70% for CBTR and 43% for RFBOT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both interventions decreased sleep-related outcomes in adult patients with OSA. Coblation appears to exhibit superiority over radiofrequency with a similar safety profile. However, further studies with direct comparisons between both interventions must be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70076"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743998/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70068
Emily S Sagalow, Yuna Kim, Shirley Wong, Robert C Wang
Objective: Stress hormone levels such as cortisol and epinephrine increase with general anesthesia (GA) and surgery. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) has been shown to increase with GA in those undergoing parathyroidectomy (PT) with abnormal parathyroid function, but there are conflicting reports of it in those with normal parathyroid function. In this study, we aim to determine the effects of anesthetic and surgical stress on those with abnormal parathyroid function undergoing PTs as well as those with normal parathyroid function undergoing unilateral/total thyroidectomies (UTs/TTs).
Study design: Prospective study.
Setting: Single tertiary academic center.
Methods: Patients undergoing TT, UT, and PT were studied. PTH was measured consecutively during the preoperative, postanesthetic induction before incision, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.
Results: One hundred sixty patients were included, with 77 and 31 undergoing TT and UT, respectively, and 52 undergoing PT. Mean PTH levels were significantly higher following induction and intubation across all groups (TT: 139.2 vs 65.1 pg/mL, 113.8% increase; UT: 130.4 vs 57.1 pg/mL, 128.4% increase; PT: 219.6 vs 163.7 pg/mL, 34.1% increase) and remained elevated until excision (TT: 131.8 pg/mL; UT: 124.9 pg/mL; PT: 228.7 pg/mL). Following UT, mean PTH declined to preoperative levels by 1 hour postexcision. Compared to thyroidectomy groups, PTH in the PT group showed more variable responses to anesthesia induction.
Conclusion: PTH consistently increases in response to anesthetic and surgical stress in adults undergoing UT and TT with normal preoperative parathyroid function. In contrast, those with hyperparathyroidism demonstrated variable changes.
目的:全身麻醉(GA)和手术后应激激素水平如皮质醇和肾上腺素升高。甲状旁腺激素(PTH)在接受甲状旁腺切除术(PT)的甲状旁腺功能异常的患者中随着GA的增加而增加,但在甲状旁腺功能正常的患者中有相互矛盾的报道。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定麻醉和手术应激对接受PTs的甲状旁腺功能异常患者以及接受单侧/全甲状腺切除术(ut / tt)甲状旁腺功能正常患者的影响。研究设计:前瞻性研究。环境:单一高等教育学术中心。方法:对接受TT、UT和PT治疗的患者进行研究。在术前、麻醉后诱导、术中、术后连续测量甲状旁腺激素。结果:纳入160例患者,分别有77例和31例接受了TT和UT, 52例接受了PT。诱导和插管后,所有组的平均PTH水平均显著升高(TT: 139.2 vs 65.1 pg/mL,增加113.8%;UT: 130.4 vs 57.1 pg/mL,增加128.4%;PT: 219.6 vs 163.7 pg/mL,增加34.1%),并保持升高直到切除(TT: 131.8 pg/mL;UT: 124.9 pg/mL;PT: 228.7 pg/mL)。手术后1小时,平均甲状旁腺激素降至术前水平。与甲状腺切除术组相比,PT组PTH对麻醉诱导的反应变化更大。结论:术前甲状旁腺功能正常的成人接受UT和TT手术时,PTH对麻醉和手术应激的反应持续增加。相比之下,甲状旁腺功能亢进症患者表现出不同的变化。
{"title":"Parathyroid Hormone Fluctuations During Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.","authors":"Emily S Sagalow, Yuna Kim, Shirley Wong, Robert C Wang","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70068","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stress hormone levels such as cortisol and epinephrine increase with general anesthesia (GA) and surgery. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) has been shown to increase with GA in those undergoing parathyroidectomy (PT) with abnormal parathyroid function, but there are conflicting reports of it in those with normal parathyroid function. In this study, we aim to determine the effects of anesthetic and surgical stress on those with abnormal parathyroid function undergoing PTs as well as those with normal parathyroid function undergoing unilateral/total thyroidectomies (UTs/TTs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing TT, UT, and PT were studied. PTH was measured consecutively during the preoperative, postanesthetic induction before incision, intraoperative, and postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty patients were included, with 77 and 31 undergoing TT and UT, respectively, and 52 undergoing PT. Mean PTH levels were significantly higher following induction and intubation across all groups (TT: 139.2 vs 65.1 pg/mL, 113.8% increase; UT: 130.4 vs 57.1 pg/mL, 128.4% increase; PT: 219.6 vs 163.7 pg/mL, 34.1% increase) and remained elevated until excision (TT: 131.8 pg/mL; UT: 124.9 pg/mL; PT: 228.7 pg/mL). Following UT, mean PTH declined to preoperative levels by 1 hour postexcision. Compared to thyroidectomy groups, PTH in the PT group showed more variable responses to anesthesia induction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTH consistently increases in response to anesthetic and surgical stress in adults undergoing UT and TT with normal preoperative parathyroid function. In contrast, those with hyperparathyroidism demonstrated variable changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739895/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-16eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70075
Luigi Angelo Vaira, Jerome R Lechien, Vincenzo Abbate, Guido Gabriele, Andrea Frosolini, Andrea De Vito, Antonino Maniaci, Miguel Mayo-Yáñez, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Alberto Maria Saibene, Fabio Maglitto, Giovanni Salzano, Gianluigi Califano, Stefania Troise, Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba, Giacomo De Riu
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of prompt construction on the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot responses in the context of head and neck surgery.
Study design: Observational and evaluative study.
Setting: An international collaboration involving 16 researchers from 11 European centers specializing in head and neck surgery.
Methods: A total of 24 questions, divided into clinical scenarios, theoretical questions, and patient inquiries, were developed. These questions were entered into ChatGPT-4o both with and without the use of a structured prompt format, known as SMART (Seeker, Mission, AI Role, Register, Targeted Question). The AI-generated responses were evaluated by experienced head and neck surgeons using the Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence instrument (QAMAI), which assesses accuracy, clarity, relevance, completeness, source quality, and usefulness.
Results: The responses generated using the SMART prompt scored significantly higher across all QAMAI dimensions compared to those without contextualized prompts. Median QAMAI scores for SMART prompts were 27.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 25-29) versus 24 (IQR 21.8-25) for unstructured prompts (P < .001). Clinical scenarios and patient inquiries showed the most significant improvements, while theoretical questions also benefited, but to a lesser extent. The AI's source quality improved notably with the SMART prompt, particularly in theoretical questions.
Conclusion: This study suggests that the structured SMART prompt format significantly enhances the quality of AI chatbot responses in head and neck surgery. This approach improves the accuracy, relevance, and completeness of AI-generated information, underscoring the importance of well-constructed prompts in clinical applications. Further research is warranted to explore the applicability of SMART prompts across different medical specialties and AI platforms.
{"title":"Enhancing AI Chatbot Responses in Health Care: The SMART Prompt Structure in Head and Neck Surgery.","authors":"Luigi Angelo Vaira, Jerome R Lechien, Vincenzo Abbate, Guido Gabriele, Andrea Frosolini, Andrea De Vito, Antonino Maniaci, Miguel Mayo-Yáñez, Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo, Alberto Maria Saibene, Fabio Maglitto, Giovanni Salzano, Gianluigi Califano, Stefania Troise, Carlos Miguel Chiesa-Estomba, Giacomo De Riu","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70075","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of prompt construction on the quality of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot responses in the context of head and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational and evaluative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An international collaboration involving 16 researchers from 11 European centers specializing in head and neck surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 24 questions, divided into clinical scenarios, theoretical questions, and patient inquiries, were developed. These questions were entered into ChatGPT-4o both with and without the use of a structured prompt format, known as SMART (Seeker, Mission, AI Role, Register, Targeted Question). The AI-generated responses were evaluated by experienced head and neck surgeons using the Quality Analysis of Medical Artificial Intelligence instrument (QAMAI), which assesses accuracy, clarity, relevance, completeness, source quality, and usefulness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The responses generated using the SMART prompt scored significantly higher across all QAMAI dimensions compared to those without contextualized prompts. Median QAMAI scores for SMART prompts were 27.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 25-29) versus 24 (IQR 21.8-25) for unstructured prompts (<i>P</i> < .001). Clinical scenarios and patient inquiries showed the most significant improvements, while theoretical questions also benefited, but to a lesser extent. The AI's source quality improved notably with the SMART prompt, particularly in theoretical questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the structured SMART prompt format significantly enhances the quality of AI chatbot responses in head and neck surgery. This approach improves the accuracy, relevance, and completeness of AI-generated information, underscoring the importance of well-constructed prompts in clinical applications. Further research is warranted to explore the applicability of SMART prompts across different medical specialties and AI platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70075"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736147/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-15eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70073
Nader G Zalaquett, Mohamad Al Mir, Rita Maria Jalkh, Sarah Nuss, Akansha Pandey, Rolvix H Patterson, Jad Hosri, Randa Al Barazi
Objective: This study aims to compare research productivity and barriers to research between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) otolaryngologists.
Study design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: International survey.
Methods: A survey developed by members of the Lebanese Otolaryngology Research and Awareness Group was disseminated globally to otolaryngologists and otolaryngology residents. The survey assessed research efficiency, funding, and perceived barriers. Data were analyzed using t tests and χ2 tests.
Results: A total of 82 responses from 21 countries were recorded, with 33 from HICs (40.2%) and 49 from LMICs (59.8%). LMIC respondents reported significantly less research funding (84.4% vs 60.6%, P = .013) and fewer publications (24.4% vs 3.1%, P = .001) compared to HIC respondents. LMICs faced unique individual barriers like elderly care responsibilities (17.8% vs 0%, P = .035). Organizational challenges in LMICs included limited access to information sources (35.7% vs 15.6%, P = .017) and financial resources (85.7% vs 40.6%, P < .001). Institutional challenges such as lack of funding (83.3% vs 34.4%, P < .001) and protected research time (71.4% vs 56.3%, P = .047) were more prominent in LMICs. Governmental barriers were also greater in LMICs, including demotivating government policies (59.0% vs 9.4%, P < .001). Additionally, covering article processing charges was a significant challenge for 76.2% of LMIC respondents compared to 31.3% in HICs (P = .001).
Conclusion: Otolaryngologists in LMICs encounter substantial barriers to research productivity compared to those in HICs, primarily due to funding gaps, lack of institutional support, and unfavorable governmental policies. Addressing these disparities is essential for fostering equitable global research contributions.
目的:本研究旨在比较高收入国家(HICs)和低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)耳鼻喉科医生的研究生产力和研究障碍。研究设计:横断面调查。设置:国际调查。方法:黎巴嫩耳鼻喉科研究和意识小组成员开展的一项调查向全球耳鼻喉科医生和耳鼻喉科住院医生传播。该调查评估了研究效率、资金和感知障碍。数据分析采用t检验和χ 2检验。结果:共记录了来自21个国家的82份答复,其中高收入国家33份(40.2%),中低收入国家49份(59.8%)。与高收入人群相比,低收入人群的研究经费明显减少(84.4%对60.6%,P = 0.013),发表的论文也明显减少(24.4%对3.1%,P = 0.001)。中低收入国家面临着独特的个体障碍,如老年人护理责任(17.8% vs 0%, P = 0.035)。中低收入国家面临的组织挑战包括信息来源有限(35.7%对15.6%,P = 0.017)和财务资源有限(85.7%对40.6%,P = 0.047)。中低收入国家的政府壁垒也更大,包括削弱政府政策的积极性(59.0% vs 9.4%, P P = .001)。结论:与高收入国家的耳鼻喉科医生相比,中低收入国家的耳鼻喉科医生在研究生产力方面遇到了重大障碍,主要原因是资金缺口、缺乏机构支持和不利的政府政策。解决这些差异对于促进公平的全球研究贡献至关重要。
{"title":"Barriers to Research Faced by High-Income Versus Low- and Middle-Income Country Otolaryngologists and Otolaryngology Residents.","authors":"Nader G Zalaquett, Mohamad Al Mir, Rita Maria Jalkh, Sarah Nuss, Akansha Pandey, Rolvix H Patterson, Jad Hosri, Randa Al Barazi","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70073","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70073","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare research productivity and barriers to research between high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) otolaryngologists.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>International survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey developed by members of the Lebanese Otolaryngology Research and Awareness Group was disseminated globally to otolaryngologists and otolaryngology residents. The survey assessed research efficiency, funding, and perceived barriers. Data were analyzed using <i>t</i> tests and <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 responses from 21 countries were recorded, with 33 from HICs (40.2%) and 49 from LMICs (59.8%). LMIC respondents reported significantly less research funding (84.4% vs 60.6%, <i>P</i> = .013) and fewer publications (24.4% vs 3.1%, <i>P</i> = .001) compared to HIC respondents. LMICs faced unique individual barriers like elderly care responsibilities (17.8% vs 0%, <i>P</i> = .035). Organizational challenges in LMICs included limited access to information sources (35.7% vs 15.6%, <i>P</i> = .017) and financial resources (85.7% vs 40.6%, <i>P</i> < .001). Institutional challenges such as lack of funding (83.3% vs 34.4%, <i>P</i> < .001) and protected research time (71.4% vs 56.3%, <i>P</i> = .047) were more prominent in LMICs. Governmental barriers were also greater in LMICs, including demotivating government policies (59.0% vs 9.4%, <i>P</i> < .001). Additionally, covering article processing charges was a significant challenge for 76.2% of LMIC respondents compared to 31.3% in HICs (<i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Otolaryngologists in LMICs encounter substantial barriers to research productivity compared to those in HICs, primarily due to funding gaps, lack of institutional support, and unfavorable governmental policies. Addressing these disparities is essential for fostering equitable global research contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733464/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-13eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1002/oto2.70019
Ahmed Bahgat, Claudio Vicini, Yassin Bahgat, Giuseppe Magliulo, Antonio Greco, Armando De Virgilio, Annalisa Pace, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome Lechien, Andrea De Vito, Giovanni Cammaroto, Alberto Caranti, Manuele Casale, Antonio Moffa, Salvatore Cocuzza, Ewa Olszewska, Tiziano Perrone, Giannicola Iannella
Barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) is a new technique to manage velo-pharyngeal obstruction and collapse in OSA patients. Tonsillectomy is a preliminary step of BRP surgery. Dissection of the PPM with monopolar or hot instruments is an essential step of the BRP technique. Tonsillectomy and muscle manipulation should be managed with careful attention due to the risk of muscle fibers rupture and surgical failure. We describe the coblator assisted BRP. The aim of this paper is to report the use and advantages of coblator technology in tonsillectomy and the velo-pharyngeal dissection before the PPM relocation with barbed sutures. In this operative technique study 100 OSA patients underwent Co-barbed technique. The CO-BRP technique has been considered fast, safe and minimally invasive with a low postoperative pain (mean value 3.63 ± 0.7). Postoperatively, a significant decrease in mean AHI from 35.63 ± 10.57 to 17.06 ± 5.92 (P < .005) emerged.
{"title":"Coblator Assisted-Barbed Relocation Pharyngoplasty (Co-BRP) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Surgical Treatment.","authors":"Ahmed Bahgat, Claudio Vicini, Yassin Bahgat, Giuseppe Magliulo, Antonio Greco, Armando De Virgilio, Annalisa Pace, Antonino Maniaci, Jerome Lechien, Andrea De Vito, Giovanni Cammaroto, Alberto Caranti, Manuele Casale, Antonio Moffa, Salvatore Cocuzza, Ewa Olszewska, Tiziano Perrone, Giannicola Iannella","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70019","DOIUrl":"10.1002/oto2.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) is a new technique to manage velo-pharyngeal obstruction and collapse in OSA patients. Tonsillectomy is a preliminary step of BRP surgery. Dissection of the PPM with monopolar or hot instruments is an essential step of the BRP technique. Tonsillectomy and muscle manipulation should be managed with careful attention due to the risk of muscle fibers rupture and surgical failure. We describe the coblator assisted BRP. The aim of this paper is to report the use and advantages of coblator technology in tonsillectomy and the velo-pharyngeal dissection before the PPM relocation with barbed sutures. In this operative technique study 100 OSA patients underwent Co-barbed technique. The CO-BRP technique has been considered fast, safe and minimally invasive with a low postoperative pain (mean value 3.63 ± 0.7). Postoperatively, a significant decrease in mean AHI from 35.63 ± 10.57 to 17.06 ± 5.92 (<i>P</i> < .005) emerged.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726117/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142979496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}