Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-30DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003883
Natalie Capretta, Diana Zepeda-Orozco, W Joshua Frazier, Jeffrey Lutmer, Cheryl Lieb-Sargel, Jennifer A Muszynski, Lindsay Kalata, Michael Welty, Ashlee Leone, Robert J Gajarski
Objective: To reduce acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with nephrotoxic medication (NTM) exposure in critically ill pediatric patients through a structured quality improvement (QI) initiative.
Design: Prospective, multi-phased QI project.
Setting: A single-center, free-standing, quaternary care children's hospital.
Patients: All patients admitted to the PICU during the study period.
Interventions: A three-phase intervention strategy was implemented to increase awareness surrounding NTM exposures in PICU and their role in subsequent AKI development. Phase 1 introduced monthly pharmacist-led educational session for resident physicians. Phase 2 incorporated an informational handout reviewed during monthly resident orientations. In phase 3, clinical pharmacists provided daily notifications to attending physicians for patients meeting NTM exposure criteria, offering timely alternatives and AKI monitoring recommendations.
Measurements and main results: NTM exposure and NTM-associated AKI (NAKI) rates per 1000 patient-days were measured across pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. From May 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, a total of 34,631 patient-days were included. During this period, 2410 and 388 patient-days, respectively, satisfied NTM exposure and NAKI criteria. This accounted for 1039 NTM exposure events in 742 patients and 159 NAKI episodes in 125 unique patients. Following interventions, NTM exposure rates declined from 30.6 to 26.9 per 1000 patient-days (a 12.4% reduction), and NAKI rates decreased from 5.6 to 2.5 per 1000 patient-days (a 55% reduction).
Conclusions: Targeted PICU-specific interventions, including routine stakeholder education and pharmacy-driven daily provider notifications, were associated with reductions in NTM exposure and subsequent NAKI rates in critically ill patients. Efforts to integrate and sustain these strategies at the institutional level are currently in progress.
{"title":"Reducing Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: Quality Improvement Project Targeting Nephrotoxic Medication Exposures.","authors":"Natalie Capretta, Diana Zepeda-Orozco, W Joshua Frazier, Jeffrey Lutmer, Cheryl Lieb-Sargel, Jennifer A Muszynski, Lindsay Kalata, Michael Welty, Ashlee Leone, Robert J Gajarski","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003883","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reduce acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with nephrotoxic medication (NTM) exposure in critically ill pediatric patients through a structured quality improvement (QI) initiative.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, multi-phased QI project.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-center, free-standing, quaternary care children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients admitted to the PICU during the study period.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>A three-phase intervention strategy was implemented to increase awareness surrounding NTM exposures in PICU and their role in subsequent AKI development. Phase 1 introduced monthly pharmacist-led educational session for resident physicians. Phase 2 incorporated an informational handout reviewed during monthly resident orientations. In phase 3, clinical pharmacists provided daily notifications to attending physicians for patients meeting NTM exposure criteria, offering timely alternatives and AKI monitoring recommendations.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>NTM exposure and NTM-associated AKI (NAKI) rates per 1000 patient-days were measured across pre-intervention and post-intervention periods. From May 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, a total of 34,631 patient-days were included. During this period, 2410 and 388 patient-days, respectively, satisfied NTM exposure and NAKI criteria. This accounted for 1039 NTM exposure events in 742 patients and 159 NAKI episodes in 125 unique patients. Following interventions, NTM exposure rates declined from 30.6 to 26.9 per 1000 patient-days (a 12.4% reduction), and NAKI rates decreased from 5.6 to 2.5 per 1000 patient-days (a 55% reduction).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted PICU-specific interventions, including routine stakeholder education and pharmacy-driven daily provider notifications, were associated with reductions in NTM exposure and subsequent NAKI rates in critically ill patients. Efforts to integrate and sustain these strategies at the institutional level are currently in progress.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"187-196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145857500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-27DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003866
Shunpei Okochi, Alexander Kreger, Isha Atre, Nahmah Kim-Campbell, Paul Waltz, Subramanian Subramanian, Burhan Mahmood, Joseph T Church
Objectives: In neonates, the carotid artery can be ligated or reconstructed at the time of decannulation from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). However, there is a paucity of data on the neurologic outcomes of one approach vs. the other. We therefore aimed to compare the brain MRI of VA-ECMO patients who had either undergone carotid reconstruction or ligation at the time of decannulation in our NICU.
Design: Single-center retrospective study.
Setting: Tertiary-level neonatal care, that is, level IV NICU.
Patients: Neonates younger than 28 days old who survived to VA-ECMO decannulation and underwent routine post-decannulation brain MRI between June 2009 and September 2022.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Eighty-one patients were included in this study: 38 of 81 (47%) with carotid reconstruction and 43 of 81 (53%) who underwent carotid ligation. We failed to identify associations between decannulation strategy and demographics, ECMO indication, cannulation duration, head ultrasound abnormalities during ECMO, and survival to hospital discharge. Overall, 54 of 81 patients (67%) displayed at least one abnormality on post-decannulation brain MRI. We failed to identify an association between decannulation strategy and focal ischemic lesions, MRI injury score, and proportion with intraventricular hemorrhage. However, there was an association between strategy and grade 2-4 IVH (reconstruction vs. ligation: 10 of 38 vs. 3 of 43; mean difference 19.3% [95% CI, 3.1-35.6%], p = 0.02).
Conclusions: In our neonatal VA-ECMO series from 2009 to 2022, follow-up brain MRI shows a high frequency of abnormalities or lesions. Overall, we failed to identify an association between decannulation strategy (i.e., carotid ligation or reconstruction) and proportion with ischemic findings. However, there appears to be an association between carotid reconstruction and higher-grade IVH. Further studies are needed to help with decision-making at the time of decannulation, to discern the mechanisms underlying the radiographic differences we identified in our series, and to investigate the connection between structural changes and long-term neurocognitive outcomes.
目的:在新生儿颈动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)脱管时,可以结扎或重建颈动脉。然而,关于一种方法与另一种方法的神经学结果的数据缺乏。因此,我们的目的是比较在我们的NICU进行颈动脉重建或结扎手术时VA-ECMO患者的脑MRI。设计:单中心回顾性研究。环境:三级新生儿护理,即IV级NICU。患者:在2009年6月至2022年9月期间,存活至VA-ECMO脱管并接受常规脱管后脑MRI的小于28天的新生儿。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:81例患者纳入本研究:81例患者中有38例(47%)行颈动脉重建,43例(53%)行颈动脉结扎。我们未能确定脱管策略与人口统计学、ECMO指征、插管时间、ECMO期间头部超声异常以及存活至出院之间的关系。总体而言,81例患者中有54例(67%)在脱管后的脑MRI上表现出至少一种异常。我们未能确定脱管策略与局灶性缺血性病变、MRI损伤评分和脑室内出血比例之间的关联。然而,策略与2-4级IVH之间存在关联(重建与结扎:38人中有10人对43人中有3人;平均差异为19.3% [95% CI, 3.1-35.6%], p = 0.02)。结论:在我们2009年至2022年的新生儿VA-ECMO系列中,随访的脑MRI显示异常或病变的频率很高。总的来说,我们未能确定脱管策略(即颈动脉结扎或重建)与缺血性发现的比例之间的关联。然而,颈动脉重建与高级别IVH之间似乎存在关联。我们还需要进一步的研究来帮助患者在进行脱管手术时做出决策,辨别我们在本系列研究中发现的放射学差异背后的机制,并调查结构变化与长期神经认知结果之间的联系。
{"title":"Follow-Up Brain MRI After Carotid Reconstruction or Ligation in Neonatal Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2022.","authors":"Shunpei Okochi, Alexander Kreger, Isha Atre, Nahmah Kim-Campbell, Paul Waltz, Subramanian Subramanian, Burhan Mahmood, Joseph T Church","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003866","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In neonates, the carotid artery can be ligated or reconstructed at the time of decannulation from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). However, there is a paucity of data on the neurologic outcomes of one approach vs. the other. We therefore aimed to compare the brain MRI of VA-ECMO patients who had either undergone carotid reconstruction or ligation at the time of decannulation in our NICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary-level neonatal care, that is, level IV NICU.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Neonates younger than 28 days old who survived to VA-ECMO decannulation and underwent routine post-decannulation brain MRI between June 2009 and September 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Eighty-one patients were included in this study: 38 of 81 (47%) with carotid reconstruction and 43 of 81 (53%) who underwent carotid ligation. We failed to identify associations between decannulation strategy and demographics, ECMO indication, cannulation duration, head ultrasound abnormalities during ECMO, and survival to hospital discharge. Overall, 54 of 81 patients (67%) displayed at least one abnormality on post-decannulation brain MRI. We failed to identify an association between decannulation strategy and focal ischemic lesions, MRI injury score, and proportion with intraventricular hemorrhage. However, there was an association between strategy and grade 2-4 IVH (reconstruction vs. ligation: 10 of 38 vs. 3 of 43; mean difference 19.3% [95% CI, 3.1-35.6%], p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our neonatal VA-ECMO series from 2009 to 2022, follow-up brain MRI shows a high frequency of abnormalities or lesions. Overall, we failed to identify an association between decannulation strategy (i.e., carotid ligation or reconstruction) and proportion with ischemic findings. However, there appears to be an association between carotid reconstruction and higher-grade IVH. Further studies are needed to help with decision-making at the time of decannulation, to discern the mechanisms underlying the radiographic differences we identified in our series, and to investigate the connection between structural changes and long-term neurocognitive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"126-136"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145637168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003881
Jamie S Penk, Vidit Bhargava, Harsha Chandnani, Grace Chong, Thomas Conlon, Ryan L DeSanti, J Wesley Diddle, Alejandro Floh, Saul Flores, Anyir Hsieh, David Kantor, Daniel Kaplan, Benjamin Kozyak, Boran Li, Christopher Lumpkin, Jennifer MacDonald, Ivanna Maxson, Akira Nishisaki, Meghna D Patel, Becky J Riggs, Michael Lintner Rivera, Michael Martinez, Marcos Mills, Michelle Ramírez, Sandeep Tripathi, Ahmed Veten, Niranjan Vijayakumar, Jesse Wenger, David K Werho, Erik Su, Awni Al-Subu
Objective: We assembled a workgroup within the Pediatric Research Collaborative on Critical UltraSound (PeRCCUS), a subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI), to define early guidance for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) institutional practice and foster future comprehensive guidelines for its broad adoption in pediatric critical care medicine.
Design: A modified Delphi method was used for creating the statements. The first meeting was an open proposal session for workgroup members to suggest items for consideration. This was followed by a cycle of voting for levels of agreement along a 7-point Likert-type scale. Items were reviewed, with only items receiving a score of greater than or equal to 6 progressing to the next stage of voting and lower-scoring items reconsidered, with only consensus items proceeding to the next stage for additional rounds of voting until consensus was reached.
Setting: Multi-institutional, multidisciplinary, workgroup of experts on POCUS organized within PeRCCUS as a subgroup of PALISI.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Consensus was obtained for 25 recommendations across five domains: clinical application, quality assurance, equipment, education, and research.
Conclusions: We report consensus recommendations for institutions on clinical use, educational programs, quality assurance, technical requirements, and future research opportunities for the adoption of pediatric critical care medicine POCUS.
{"title":"Good Practice Concepts in Pediatric Critical Care Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Modified Delphi Consensus Initiative.","authors":"Jamie S Penk, Vidit Bhargava, Harsha Chandnani, Grace Chong, Thomas Conlon, Ryan L DeSanti, J Wesley Diddle, Alejandro Floh, Saul Flores, Anyir Hsieh, David Kantor, Daniel Kaplan, Benjamin Kozyak, Boran Li, Christopher Lumpkin, Jennifer MacDonald, Ivanna Maxson, Akira Nishisaki, Meghna D Patel, Becky J Riggs, Michael Lintner Rivera, Michael Martinez, Marcos Mills, Michelle Ramírez, Sandeep Tripathi, Ahmed Veten, Niranjan Vijayakumar, Jesse Wenger, David K Werho, Erik Su, Awni Al-Subu","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003881","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assembled a workgroup within the Pediatric Research Collaborative on Critical UltraSound (PeRCCUS), a subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI), to define early guidance for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) institutional practice and foster future comprehensive guidelines for its broad adoption in pediatric critical care medicine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi method was used for creating the statements. The first meeting was an open proposal session for workgroup members to suggest items for consideration. This was followed by a cycle of voting for levels of agreement along a 7-point Likert-type scale. Items were reviewed, with only items receiving a score of greater than or equal to 6 progressing to the next stage of voting and lower-scoring items reconsidered, with only consensus items proceeding to the next stage for additional rounds of voting until consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional, multidisciplinary, workgroup of experts on POCUS organized within PeRCCUS as a subgroup of PALISI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Consensus was obtained for 25 recommendations across five domains: clinical application, quality assurance, equipment, education, and research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report consensus recommendations for institutions on clinical use, educational programs, quality assurance, technical requirements, and future research opportunities for the adoption of pediatric critical care medicine POCUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"27 2","pages":"228-234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003898
Robert C Tasker
{"title":"Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the PICU: What We Now Know and What We Want to Know?","authors":"Robert C Tasker","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003898","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"27 2","pages":"218-221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003870
Raul Copana-Olmos, Nils Casson, Willmer Diaz-Villalobos, Victor Urquieta-Clavel, Mary Tejerina-Ortiz, Miguel Cespedes-Lesczinsky, Vladimir Aguilera-Avendaño, Maricruz Fernández-Vidal, Mariel Forest-Yepez, Danny Blanco-Espejo, Ibeth Rivera-Murguia, Claudia Castro-Auza, Milenka Gamboa-Lanza, Jhovana E Paco-Barral, Gustavo Choque-Osco, Betzhi Vera-Dorado, Carol Mendoza-Montoya, Magbely Cuellar-Gutierrez, Jaime Fernandez-Sarmiento
Objectives: In a cohort of children with septic shock, we evaluated the association between vasoactive agent use within 1 hour of starting our sepsis bundle and mortality. Secondarily, we assessed the relationship between sepsis bundle adherence and mortality and other outcomes.
Design: Nonpreplanned, secondary analysis of a national multicenter dataset collected in a resource-limited setting.
Setting: Dataset from 14 centers in Bolivia collected between January 2023 and December 2023.
Patients: Children under 15 years old with sepsis or septic shock defined using altitude-adjusted Phoenix criteria.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We included 268 patients in this secondary analysis, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 17 months (IQR, 6-63 mo). The sepsis bundle was used within 3 hours in 131 of 268 patients (49%). Vasopressors were used in 102 of 268 patients (38%) and 85 of 102 (83%) had received peripheral administration within the 1 hour of persistent hypotension, without any record of adverse events. Early vasopressor use within 1 hour of septic shock recognition, and antibiotic administration within 1 hour of sepsis recognition, were independently associated with lower odds (using adjusted odds ratio [aOR] and 95% CI) of mortality, respectively: 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.89) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.24-0.71; both p = 0.001). Failure to complete the sepsis bundle within 3 hours was associated with greater odds of mortality (aOR, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.64-7.91]; p = 0.001) and greater odds of longer interval before emergency consultation (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]; p = 0.023).
Conclusions: Early initiation of vasoactive agents in children with septic shock and timely sepsis bundle completion were independently associated with lower hazard of mortality. Historically, in Bolivia in 2023, bundle adherence was suboptimal, yet feasible interventions were associated with greater odds of better outcomes in pediatric sepsis and septic shock.
{"title":"Sepsis Bundle Adherence and Early Vasopressor Administration in Pediatric Septic Shock: Secondary Analysis of Outcomes in a 2023 Multicenter Cohort in Bolivia.","authors":"Raul Copana-Olmos, Nils Casson, Willmer Diaz-Villalobos, Victor Urquieta-Clavel, Mary Tejerina-Ortiz, Miguel Cespedes-Lesczinsky, Vladimir Aguilera-Avendaño, Maricruz Fernández-Vidal, Mariel Forest-Yepez, Danny Blanco-Espejo, Ibeth Rivera-Murguia, Claudia Castro-Auza, Milenka Gamboa-Lanza, Jhovana E Paco-Barral, Gustavo Choque-Osco, Betzhi Vera-Dorado, Carol Mendoza-Montoya, Magbely Cuellar-Gutierrez, Jaime Fernandez-Sarmiento","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003870","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In a cohort of children with septic shock, we evaluated the association between vasoactive agent use within 1 hour of starting our sepsis bundle and mortality. Secondarily, we assessed the relationship between sepsis bundle adherence and mortality and other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nonpreplanned, secondary analysis of a national multicenter dataset collected in a resource-limited setting.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Dataset from 14 centers in Bolivia collected between January 2023 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children under 15 years old with sepsis or septic shock defined using altitude-adjusted Phoenix criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We included 268 patients in this secondary analysis, with median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 17 months (IQR, 6-63 mo). The sepsis bundle was used within 3 hours in 131 of 268 patients (49%). Vasopressors were used in 102 of 268 patients (38%) and 85 of 102 (83%) had received peripheral administration within the 1 hour of persistent hypotension, without any record of adverse events. Early vasopressor use within 1 hour of septic shock recognition, and antibiotic administration within 1 hour of sepsis recognition, were independently associated with lower odds (using adjusted odds ratio [aOR] and 95% CI) of mortality, respectively: 0.49 (95% CI, 0.28-0.89) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.24-0.71; both p = 0.001). Failure to complete the sepsis bundle within 3 hours was associated with greater odds of mortality (aOR, 3.61 [95% CI, 1.64-7.91]; p = 0.001) and greater odds of longer interval before emergency consultation (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]; p = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early initiation of vasoactive agents in children with septic shock and timely sepsis bundle completion were independently associated with lower hazard of mortality. Historically, in Bolivia in 2023, bundle adherence was suboptimal, yet feasible interventions were associated with greater odds of better outcomes in pediatric sepsis and septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003876
Vanessa Toomey, Steven Howard, Margaret J Klein, Christopher L Carroll, Matthew C Scanlon, Jose A Pineda
Objective: To evaluate the financial consequence of admission to PICU during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: PICUs in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Virtual Pediatric System (VPS) databases.
Patients: PICU admissions in children younger than 18 years from January 2017 to March 2023.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We queried 29 diagnostic categories using two unlinked national databases, PHIS and VPS. Costs were calculated from PHIS charges using the hospital's specific cost to charge ratio. From PHIS, median charges and costs per PICU day were determined for each diagnosis, year, region, and hospital status. The median charges and costs per PICU days were matched to VPS PICU days. Multivariable mixed modeling was used, controlling for center, length of stay (LOS), and severity of illness which included use of mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. The primary outcomes were PICU charges and costs per day. The secondary outcomes were bed days, cumulative charges and costs. There were 484,328 PHIS and 331,740 VPS encounters. Percent change (95% CI) in encounter-level costs per PICU day increased (8.9% [95% CI, 8.8-9.1], p < 0.001) at a greater rate than encounter-level charges (4.1% [95% CI, 1.2-7.2], p = 0.006)) when comparing pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 years, after controlling for LOS, severity of illness and diagnosis. Bed days for bronchiolitis, asthma, pneumonia, and respiratory failure decreased by 28-94% compared with the average pre-COVID-19 years. After combining all diagnoses, bed days decreased by 70,100 (33%), and PICU charges decreased by $1.2 billion during COVID year 1, when compared with the average pre-COVID-19 years.
Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the financial vulnerability of PHIS/VPS contributing PICUs in the United States. Bed days are a key driver to maintaining financial margins.
目的:评估美国COVID-19大流行期间PICU住院的经济后果。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:儿童卫生信息系统(PHIS)和虚拟儿童系统(VPS)数据库中的picu。患者:2017年1月至2023年3月期间入院PICU的18岁以下儿童。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们查询了29个诊断类别使用两个不关联的国家数据库,公共卫生信息系统和VPS。费用是根据医院的具体成本收费比从公共卫生信息系统收费中计算出来的。从公共卫生信息系统中,每个诊断、年份、地区和医院状况确定了每个PICU日的中位数收费和费用。每PICU天的中位数费用和成本与VPS PICU天相匹配。采用多变量混合模型,控制中心、住院时间(LOS)和疾病严重程度,包括使用机械通气、体外膜氧合支持和儿童死亡风险评分。主要结局是PICU收费和每日费用。次要指标为住院天数、累计费用和费用。有484,328例PHIS和331,740例VPS病例。在控制LOS、疾病严重程度和诊断后,与COVID-19前和COVID-19年相比,每PICU天就诊水平费用的百分比变化(95% CI)增加(8.9% [95% CI, 8.8-9.1], p < 0.001),其增加率高于就诊水平费用(4.1% [95% CI, 1.2-7.2], p = 0.006)。与covid -19前的平均水平相比,毛细支气管炎、哮喘、肺炎和呼吸衰竭的卧床天数减少了28-94%。综合所有诊断后,与COVID-19前的平均年份相比,在COVID-19第一年,住院天数减少了70,100天(33%),PICU费用减少了12亿美元。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行暴露了美国公共卫生信息系统(PHIS) /VPS提供picu的财务脆弱性。卧床时间是维持财务利润率的关键驱动因素。
{"title":"Financial Consequence of COVID-19 on United States PICUs: A 2017 to 2023 Study Using the Pediatric Health Information System and the Virtual Pediatric System Database.","authors":"Vanessa Toomey, Steven Howard, Margaret J Klein, Christopher L Carroll, Matthew C Scanlon, Jose A Pineda","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003876","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003876","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the financial consequence of admission to PICU during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICUs in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Virtual Pediatric System (VPS) databases.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>PICU admissions in children younger than 18 years from January 2017 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We queried 29 diagnostic categories using two unlinked national databases, PHIS and VPS. Costs were calculated from PHIS charges using the hospital's specific cost to charge ratio. From PHIS, median charges and costs per PICU day were determined for each diagnosis, year, region, and hospital status. The median charges and costs per PICU days were matched to VPS PICU days. Multivariable mixed modeling was used, controlling for center, length of stay (LOS), and severity of illness which included use of mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. The primary outcomes were PICU charges and costs per day. The secondary outcomes were bed days, cumulative charges and costs. There were 484,328 PHIS and 331,740 VPS encounters. Percent change (95% CI) in encounter-level costs per PICU day increased (8.9% [95% CI, 8.8-9.1], p < 0.001) at a greater rate than encounter-level charges (4.1% [95% CI, 1.2-7.2], p = 0.006)) when comparing pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 years, after controlling for LOS, severity of illness and diagnosis. Bed days for bronchiolitis, asthma, pneumonia, and respiratory failure decreased by 28-94% compared with the average pre-COVID-19 years. After combining all diagnoses, bed days decreased by 70,100 (33%), and PICU charges decreased by $1.2 billion during COVID year 1, when compared with the average pre-COVID-19 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the financial vulnerability of PHIS/VPS contributing PICUs in the United States. Bed days are a key driver to maintaining financial margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"155-165"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145820052","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003886
Michael Lintner-Rivera, Ivanna N Maxson, Awni M Al-Subu, Vidit Bhargava, Harsha K Chandnani, Grace Chong, Thomas W Conlon, Joshua J Davis, Saul Flores, Sarah Ginsburg, Peter Gutierrez, Bereketeab Haileselassie, Benjamin W Kozyak, Boran Li, Jennifer M MacDonald, Akira Nishisaki, Michelle M Ramírez, Sandeep Tripathi, Jesse L Wenger, Eduardo Fastag-Guttman, Peter T Scully, Satid Thammasitboon, Erik Su
Objective: Develop a consensus-based framework for point-of care ultrasound in pediatric critical care, or critical care ultrasound (CCUS) education using entrustable professional activities (EPAs).
Design: A modified Delphi method utilizing cycles of meetings and surveys for consensus-building.
Setting: The endeavor involved members of the Pediatric Research Collaborative on Critical Ultrasound (PeRCCUS), a subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury And Sepsis Investigators.
Subjects: An expert panel consisting of 23 members representing 17 institutions, including diverse healthcare professionals involved in pediatric critical care ultrasound.
Interventions: Three iterative modified Delphi rounds were conducted to propose and refine critical care ultrasound EPAs.
Measurements and main results: The endeavor achieved a 74% response rate. Fourteen EPAs were formulated across five domains: Cardiac, Pulmonary, Abdomen, Procedures, and Vascular, along with two consensus opinions on educational content and methods. EPAs were evaluated using 5-point Likert items, requiring a median score of greater than or equal to 4.5 for progression.
Conclusions: This collaborative effort led to the establishment of fourteen EPAs for pediatric critical care ultrasound, offering a structured approach for education and competency assessment in pediatric critical care. This initiative lays the groundwork for evolving standards in pediatric critical care ultrasound education and practice.
{"title":"Proposing Entrustable Professional Activities for Pediatric Critical Care Ultrasound: A Modified Delphi Consensus Approach.","authors":"Michael Lintner-Rivera, Ivanna N Maxson, Awni M Al-Subu, Vidit Bhargava, Harsha K Chandnani, Grace Chong, Thomas W Conlon, Joshua J Davis, Saul Flores, Sarah Ginsburg, Peter Gutierrez, Bereketeab Haileselassie, Benjamin W Kozyak, Boran Li, Jennifer M MacDonald, Akira Nishisaki, Michelle M Ramírez, Sandeep Tripathi, Jesse L Wenger, Eduardo Fastag-Guttman, Peter T Scully, Satid Thammasitboon, Erik Su","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003886","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003886","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Develop a consensus-based framework for point-of care ultrasound in pediatric critical care, or critical care ultrasound (CCUS) education using entrustable professional activities (EPAs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A modified Delphi method utilizing cycles of meetings and surveys for consensus-building.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The endeavor involved members of the Pediatric Research Collaborative on Critical Ultrasound (PeRCCUS), a subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury And Sepsis Investigators.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>An expert panel consisting of 23 members representing 17 institutions, including diverse healthcare professionals involved in pediatric critical care ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Three iterative modified Delphi rounds were conducted to propose and refine critical care ultrasound EPAs.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The endeavor achieved a 74% response rate. Fourteen EPAs were formulated across five domains: Cardiac, Pulmonary, Abdomen, Procedures, and Vascular, along with two consensus opinions on educational content and methods. EPAs were evaluated using 5-point Likert items, requiring a median score of greater than or equal to 4.5 for progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This collaborative effort led to the establishment of fourteen EPAs for pediatric critical care ultrasound, offering a structured approach for education and competency assessment in pediatric critical care. This initiative lays the groundwork for evolving standards in pediatric critical care ultrasound education and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"27 2","pages":"235-243"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003903
Miriam R Fine-Goulden
{"title":"Sorry.","authors":"Miriam R Fine-Goulden","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003903","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003907
Brianna R Qualizza, Cynthia J Bowers, Anne E McCallister
{"title":"Nurse-Led Tube Guardian Protocol in Response to Unplanned Extubations in the PICU.","authors":"Brianna R Qualizza, Cynthia J Bowers, Anne E McCallister","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003907","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}