首页 > 最新文献

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluation of Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Exploratory Analysis of Characteristics and Outcomes in an Emergency Transport PICU Cohort From the United Kingdom, 2014-2016. Phoenix脓毒症评分标准的评价:2014-2016年英国紧急运输PICU队列的特征和结果的探索性分析
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682
Michael J Carter, Joshua Hageman, Yael Feinstein, Jethro Herberg, Myrsini Kaforou, Mark J Peters, Simon Nadel, Naomi Edmonds, Nazima Pathan, Michael Levin, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan

Objectives: To assess characteristics and outcomes of children with suspected or confirmed infection requiring emergency transport and PICU admission and to explore the association between the 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) criteria and mortality.

Design: Retrospective analysis of curated data from a 2014-2016 multicenter cohort study.

Setting: PICU admission following emergency transport in South East England, United Kingdom, from April 2014 to December 2016.

Patients: Children 0-16 years old ( n = 663) of whom 444 (67%) had suspected or confirmed infection.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The PSS was calculated as a sum of four individual organ subscores (respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and coagulation) using the worst values during transport (i.e., from referral until the time of PICU admission). A score cutoff of greater than or equal to 2 points was used to define sepsis; and septic shock was defined as sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular subscore points. Sepsis occurred in 260 of 444 children (58.6%) with suspected or confirmed infection, with septic shock occurring in 177 of 260 (68.1%) of those with sepsis. A PSS score greater than or equal to 2 points occurred in 37 of 67 bronchiolitis cases, 19 of 35 meningoencephalitis cases, 30 of 47 pneumonia/empyema cases, 38 of 46 septic/toxic shock cases, nine of 15 severe sepsis cases, and 58 of 118 definite viral infections. Overall, 14 of 444 children died (3.2%). There were 12 deaths in the 260 children with PSS greater than or equal to 2, and two deaths in the 184 children with PSS less than 2 (4.6% vs. 1.1%; absolute difference, 3.5%; 95% CI, 0.1-6.9%; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: In 2014-2016, over half of the critically ill children undergoing emergency transport to PICU with presumed or confirmed infection, and meeting retrospectively applied PSS criteria for sepsis, had a range of clinical diagnoses including bronchiolitis, meningoencephalitis, and pneumonia/empyema. Furthermore, the PSS criteria for categorization of sepsis and septic shock were associated with outcome and may be of value in future risk-stratification in clinical trials.

目的:评估疑似或确诊感染需要紧急转运和PICU入院的儿童的特征和结局,并探讨2024 Phoenix脓毒症评分(PSS)标准与死亡率之间的关系。设计:回顾性分析2014-2016年多中心队列研究的整理数据。背景:2014年4月至2016年12月,英国英格兰东南部紧急转运后入院PICU。患者:0-16岁儿童(n = 663),其中444例(67%)疑似或确诊感染。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:PSS计算为四个单独器官评分(呼吸、心血管、神经和凝血)的总和,使用运输期间(即从转诊到PICU入院)的最差值。脓毒症采用大于或等于2分的评分截止;脓毒性休克定义为脓毒症加上1个或更多的心血管亚评分。444例疑似或确诊感染患儿中有260例(58.6%)发生脓毒症,260例脓毒症患儿中有177例(68.1%)发生脓毒症休克。67例细支气管炎患者中有37例PSS评分大于等于2分,35例脑膜脑炎患者中有19例,47例肺炎/脓肿患者中有30例,46例脓毒症/中毒性休克患者中有38例,15例严重脓毒症患者中有9例,118例明确病毒感染患者中有58例。总体而言,444名儿童中有14人死亡(3.2%)。260例大于或等于2的PSS患儿中有12例死亡,184例小于2的PSS患儿中有2例死亡(4.6% vs. 1.1%;绝对差,3.5%;95% ci, 0.1-6.9%;P = 0.04)。结论:2014-2016年,超过半数推定或确诊感染并符合回顾性应用PSS脓毒症标准的危重患儿被紧急送往PICU,其临床诊断包括细支气管炎、脑膜脑炎和肺炎/脓胸。此外,PSS对脓毒症和脓毒性休克的分类标准与结果相关,可能对未来临床试验中的风险分层有价值。
{"title":"Evaluation of Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Exploratory Analysis of Characteristics and Outcomes in an Emergency Transport PICU Cohort From the United Kingdom, 2014-2016.","authors":"Michael J Carter, Joshua Hageman, Yael Feinstein, Jethro Herberg, Myrsini Kaforou, Mark J Peters, Simon Nadel, Naomi Edmonds, Nazima Pathan, Michael Levin, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess characteristics and outcomes of children with suspected or confirmed infection requiring emergency transport and PICU admission and to explore the association between the 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) criteria and mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of curated data from a 2014-2016 multicenter cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICU admission following emergency transport in South East England, United Kingdom, from April 2014 to December 2016.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 0-16 years old ( n = 663) of whom 444 (67%) had suspected or confirmed infection.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The PSS was calculated as a sum of four individual organ subscores (respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and coagulation) using the worst values during transport (i.e., from referral until the time of PICU admission). A score cutoff of greater than or equal to 2 points was used to define sepsis; and septic shock was defined as sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular subscore points. Sepsis occurred in 260 of 444 children (58.6%) with suspected or confirmed infection, with septic shock occurring in 177 of 260 (68.1%) of those with sepsis. A PSS score greater than or equal to 2 points occurred in 37 of 67 bronchiolitis cases, 19 of 35 meningoencephalitis cases, 30 of 47 pneumonia/empyema cases, 38 of 46 septic/toxic shock cases, nine of 15 severe sepsis cases, and 58 of 118 definite viral infections. Overall, 14 of 444 children died (3.2%). There were 12 deaths in the 260 children with PSS greater than or equal to 2, and two deaths in the 184 children with PSS less than 2 (4.6% vs. 1.1%; absolute difference, 3.5%; 95% CI, 0.1-6.9%; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2014-2016, over half of the critically ill children undergoing emergency transport to PICU with presumed or confirmed infection, and meeting retrospectively applied PSS criteria for sepsis, had a range of clinical diagnoses including bronchiolitis, meningoencephalitis, and pneumonia/empyema. Furthermore, the PSS criteria for categorization of sepsis and septic shock were associated with outcome and may be of value in future risk-stratification in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e186-e196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 3, What About Using Stages of Sepsis in the Criteria?
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662
Mark W Hall, Rakesh Lodha, Niranjan Kissoon, Adrienne G Randolph
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 3, What About Using Stages of Sepsis in the Criteria?","authors":"Mark W Hall, Rakesh Lodha, Niranjan Kissoon, Adrienne G Randolph","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e256-e261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 1, the Evolution in Definition of Sepsis and Septic Shock.
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664
R Scott Watson, Andrew C Argent, Lauren R Sorce, Adrienne G Randolph, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Tellen D Bennett, Niranjan Kissoon, Luregn J Schlapbach
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 1, the Evolution in Definition of Sepsis and Septic Shock.","authors":"R Scott Watson, Andrew C Argent, Lauren R Sorce, Adrienne G Randolph, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Tellen D Bennett, Niranjan Kissoon, Luregn J Schlapbach","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e246-e251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 2, What About Using Interventions in the Criteria?
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672
Claudio Flauzino de Oliveira, Idris Evans, Andrew C Argent, Rakesh Lodha, Kusum Menon
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 2, What About Using Interventions in the Criteria?","authors":"Claudio Flauzino de Oliveira, Idris Evans, Andrew C Argent, Rakesh Lodha, Kusum Menon","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e252-e255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pediatric Resuscitation Skill of Bag-Tube Manual Ventilation: Developing and Using a Mobile Simulation Program to Assess Competency of a Multiprofessional PICU Team. 儿科复苏技能之袋管人工通气:开发和使用移动模拟程序评估 PICU 多专业团队的能力。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612
Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga

Objectives: To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.

Design: Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.

Setting: In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.

Subjects: Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.

Conclusions: Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.

目的使用移动模拟装置,评估 PICU 多专业团队成员使用流量充气袋进行袋管手动通气的技能:设计:2022 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月的前瞻性观察研究:研究对象: PICU多专业团队成员:多专业 PICU 团队成员,包括护士、呼吸治疗师、执业护士、研究员和主治医师:干预措施:无:我们招募了 129 名参与者,他们两次完成了使用充气袋进行袋管手动通气的 1 分钟任务。会议进行了录像,其中四次无法进行分析。只有 30% 的参与者表示非常自信或非常自信,大多数人(62%)表示不经常进行技能操作。任务成功的定义是在 80% 的送气过程中达到目标压力范围,呼吸频率 (RR) 达到 25-35 次/分钟,以及成功打开阀门。在 129 名参与者中,只有 5 人(4%)达到了成功通气的定义。总体而言,参与者更倾向于使用较低的压力和较快的呼吸频率。维持目标呼气末正压 (PEEP) 的成功率最低(19%),其次是呼吸频率(52%)、关闭活瓣(64%),然后是吸气峰压(71%)。与所有其他专业相比,护士达到目标压力的可能性较低:结论:PICU 多专业团队成员对使用充气袋进行袋管手动通气的自信心差异很大。观察结果表明,在达到目标通气参数,尤其是维持 PEEP 方面,成功率很低。未来的研究应侧重于开发移动模拟装置,以促进针对特定专业的实时指导,教授高质量的手动通气,并将其应用到床旁。
{"title":"Pediatric Resuscitation Skill of Bag-Tube Manual Ventilation: Developing and Using a Mobile Simulation Program to Assess Competency of a Multiprofessional PICU Team.","authors":"Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e206-e215"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142471873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insight From a Cardiovascular Simulator. 急性机械循环支持:从心血管模拟器的见解。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671
Ronald A Bronicki, Sebastian C Tume, Saul Flores, Rohit S Loomba, Nirica M Borges, Daniel J Penny, Daniel Burkhoff
{"title":"Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insight From a Cardiovascular Simulator.","authors":"Ronald A Bronicki, Sebastian C Tume, Saul Flores, Rohit S Loomba, Nirica M Borges, Daniel J Penny, Daniel Burkhoff","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e272-e277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome to Critically Ill Children: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2019-2023.
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003625
Soichiro Tanimura, Norihiko Tsuboi, Saki Endo, Shin Tsubokura, Eisaku Nashiki, Shotaro Matsumoto, Satoshi Nakagawa
{"title":"Application of Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome to Critically Ill Children: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort, 2019-2023.","authors":"Soichiro Tanimura, Norihiko Tsuboi, Saki Endo, Shin Tsubokura, Eisaku Nashiki, Shotaro Matsumoto, Satoshi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003625","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003625","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e281-e283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Pediatric Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP): Statistical Methods Planned in the Bayesian, Adaptive, Duration Finding Trial. 降温时间对心脏骤停患者疗效的儿科影响(P-ICECAP):贝叶斯适应性持续时间发现试验计划的统计方法
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667
John M VanBuren, Sharon D Yeatts, Richard Holubkov, Frank W Moler, Alexis Topjian, Kent Page, Robert G Clevenger, William J Meurer

Objectives: To determine the optimal cooling duration for children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using an adaptive Bayesian trial design.

Design: The Pediatric Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP) trial is a randomized, response-adaptive duration/dose-finding clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants are randomized to one of several cooling durations (0, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, or 96 hr). The first 150 participants are randomized 1:1:1 to 24-, 48-, and 72-hour durations. Response-adaptive randomization is used thereafter to allocate participants based on emerging duration-response data.

Setting: PICUs.

Patients: Up to 900 pediatric patients 2 days to younger than 18 years old who have survived OHCA and been admitted to an ICU.

Interventions: Duration of targeted temperature management using a surface temperature control device.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome is the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition mortality composite score, assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category and Pediatric Resuscitation after Cardiac Arrest scores, as well as survival at 12 months. Bayesian modeling is employed to evaluate the duration-response curve and determine the optimal cooling duration. The trial is designed to adaptively update randomization probabilities every 10 weeks, maximizing the allocation of participants to potentially optimal cooling durations. Over 90% power is achieved for the hypothesized scenarios.

Conclusions: The P-ICECAP trial aims to identify the shortest cooling duration that provides the maximum treatment effect for pediatric OHCA patients. The adaptive design allows for flexibility and efficiency in handling various clinical scenarios, potentially transforming pediatric cardiac arrest care by optimizing hypothermia treatment protocols.

目的:采用自适应贝叶斯试验设计确定院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后儿童的最佳降温时间。设计:降温时间对心脏骤停患者疗效的儿科影响(P-ICECAP)试验是一项随机、反应适应性持续时间/剂量寻找的临床试验,采用盲法结局评估。参与者被随机分配到几个冷却持续时间之一(0,12,18,24,36,48,60,72,84或96小时)。前150名参与者以1:1:1的比例随机分配到24小时、48小时和72小时。响应自适应随机化随后被用于根据新出现的持续时间-响应数据分配参与者。设置:皮库斯。患者:多达900名2天至18岁以下的儿科患者,他们在OHCA中幸存并被送入ICU。干预措施:使用表面温度控制装置进行目标温度管理的持续时间。测量和主要结果:主要结果是Vineland适应行为量表-第三版死亡率综合评分,在12个月时评估。次要结局包括儿科脑功能类别和儿科心脏骤停后复苏评分的变化,以及12个月的生存率。采用贝叶斯模型评估持续时间-响应曲线,确定最佳冷却时间。该试验旨在每10周自适应更新随机化概率,最大限度地分配参与者到潜在的最佳冷却持续时间。在假设的情况下,功率达到90%以上。结论:P-ICECAP试验旨在确定为儿童OHCA患者提供最大治疗效果的最短冷却时间。适应性设计允许灵活和高效地处理各种临床场景,通过优化低温治疗方案,有可能改变儿科心脏骤停护理。
{"title":"The Pediatric Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP): Statistical Methods Planned in the Bayesian, Adaptive, Duration Finding Trial.","authors":"John M VanBuren, Sharon D Yeatts, Richard Holubkov, Frank W Moler, Alexis Topjian, Kent Page, Robert G Clevenger, William J Meurer","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the optimal cooling duration for children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using an adaptive Bayesian trial design.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pediatric Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP) trial is a randomized, response-adaptive duration/dose-finding clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants are randomized to one of several cooling durations (0, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, or 96 hr). The first 150 participants are randomized 1:1:1 to 24-, 48-, and 72-hour durations. Response-adaptive randomization is used thereafter to allocate participants based on emerging duration-response data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Up to 900 pediatric patients 2 days to younger than 18 years old who have survived OHCA and been admitted to an ICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Duration of targeted temperature management using a surface temperature control device.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome is the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition mortality composite score, assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category and Pediatric Resuscitation after Cardiac Arrest scores, as well as survival at 12 months. Bayesian modeling is employed to evaluate the duration-response curve and determine the optimal cooling duration. The trial is designed to adaptively update randomization probabilities every 10 weeks, maximizing the allocation of participants to potentially optimal cooling durations. Over 90% power is achieved for the hypothesized scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P-ICECAP trial aims to identify the shortest cooling duration that provides the maximum treatment effect for pediatric OHCA patients. The adaptive design allows for flexibility and efficiency in handling various clinical scenarios, potentially transforming pediatric cardiac arrest care by optimizing hypothermia treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e227-e236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reviewer Acknowledgment.
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003704
{"title":"Reviewer Acknowledgment.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003704","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e284-e286"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tracheal Intubation by Attending Physicians in a U.S. Registry, 2016-2020: Analysis by PICU Participation in a Skills Maintenance Program and Fellowship Training.
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646
Mizue Kishida, Robert A Berg, Natalie Napolitano, John Berkenbosch, Andrea Talukdar, Philipp Jung, Matthew P Malone, Simon J Parsons, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Sholeen Nett, Lily Glater, Conrad Krawiec, Asha Shenoi, Awni Al-Subu, Lee Polikoff, Serena P Kelly, Carolyn K Adams, John S Giuliano, Shashikanth Ambati, David Tellez, Rebecca J Martin, Anthony Lee, Ryan K Breuer, Katherine V Biagas, Palen P Mallory, Kelly L Corbett, G Kris Bysani, Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Samantha Wirkowski, Matthew Pinto, Megan Toal, Rachel K Marlow, Michelle Adu-Darko, Justine Shults, Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki

Objectives: Tracheal intubation (TI) is a critical skill for PICU attending physicians to maintain. We hypothesize that attendings perform fewer TIs and have lower success rate in PICU programs with a Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship.

Design: Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) from July 2016 to June 2020. Exposures were presence of PCCM fellowship and attending TI skill maintenance program (SMP). The primary outcome was attending's first attempt success and the secondary outcome was adverse airway outcome in the first attempt.

Setting: Thirty-three PICUs in North America.

Patients: Children receiving TI.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Overall, 23 of 33 PICUs had a PCCM fellowship with three of 23 having an attending TI SMP. Attendings performed TI in 24.1% (2,728/11,323): 13.9% (13.8 TI/yr per PICU) in PICUs with a fellowship vs. 66.0% (36.6 TI/yr per PICU) without a fellowship (p < 0.001). Attending first attempt success in PICUs with vs. without fellowships was 70.5% vs. 81.3% (difference, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.6-14.0%]; p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounders, attendings in a PICU with a fellowship had lower odds for first attempt success (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.90]). We failed to find an association between attending first attempt success and PICU program type, with vs. without a TI SMP (74.0% vs. 69.5%; p = 0.146). The adverse airway outcome rate of the TI with attending's first attempt was lower in PICU programs with vs. without a TI SMP (32.8% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.020). However, after adjusting for confounders, we failed to exclude the possibility of near halving of odds of adverse outcome (aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55-1.01]; p = 0.058).

Conclusions: Attendings in PICU programs with a fellowship have fewer opportunities to perform TI and lower first attempt success rates. Opportunities exist for attending TI skill maintenance, especially in PICUs with a PCCM fellowship.

{"title":"Tracheal Intubation by Attending Physicians in a U.S. Registry, 2016-2020: Analysis by PICU Participation in a Skills Maintenance Program and Fellowship Training.","authors":"Mizue Kishida, Robert A Berg, Natalie Napolitano, John Berkenbosch, Andrea Talukdar, Philipp Jung, Matthew P Malone, Simon J Parsons, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Sholeen Nett, Lily Glater, Conrad Krawiec, Asha Shenoi, Awni Al-Subu, Lee Polikoff, Serena P Kelly, Carolyn K Adams, John S Giuliano, Shashikanth Ambati, David Tellez, Rebecca J Martin, Anthony Lee, Ryan K Breuer, Katherine V Biagas, Palen P Mallory, Kelly L Corbett, G Kris Bysani, Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Samantha Wirkowski, Matthew Pinto, Megan Toal, Rachel K Marlow, Michelle Adu-Darko, Justine Shults, Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tracheal intubation (TI) is a critical skill for PICU attending physicians to maintain. We hypothesize that attendings perform fewer TIs and have lower success rate in PICU programs with a Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) from July 2016 to June 2020. Exposures were presence of PCCM fellowship and attending TI skill maintenance program (SMP). The primary outcome was attending's first attempt success and the secondary outcome was adverse airway outcome in the first attempt.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-three PICUs in North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children receiving TI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Overall, 23 of 33 PICUs had a PCCM fellowship with three of 23 having an attending TI SMP. Attendings performed TI in 24.1% (2,728/11,323): 13.9% (13.8 TI/yr per PICU) in PICUs with a fellowship vs. 66.0% (36.6 TI/yr per PICU) without a fellowship (p < 0.001). Attending first attempt success in PICUs with vs. without fellowships was 70.5% vs. 81.3% (difference, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.6-14.0%]; p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounders, attendings in a PICU with a fellowship had lower odds for first attempt success (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.90]). We failed to find an association between attending first attempt success and PICU program type, with vs. without a TI SMP (74.0% vs. 69.5%; p = 0.146). The adverse airway outcome rate of the TI with attending's first attempt was lower in PICU programs with vs. without a TI SMP (32.8% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.020). However, after adjusting for confounders, we failed to exclude the possibility of near halving of odds of adverse outcome (aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55-1.01]; p = 0.058).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attendings in PICU programs with a fellowship have fewer opportunities to perform TI and lower first attempt success rates. Opportunities exist for attending TI skill maintenance, especially in PICUs with a PCCM fellowship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e166-e176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850027/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1