Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-01-02DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682
Michael J Carter, Joshua Hageman, Yael Feinstein, Jethro Herberg, Myrsini Kaforou, Mark J Peters, Simon Nadel, Naomi Edmonds, Nazima Pathan, Michael Levin, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Objectives: To assess characteristics and outcomes of children with suspected or confirmed infection requiring emergency transport and PICU admission and to explore the association between the 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) criteria and mortality.
Design: Retrospective analysis of curated data from a 2014-2016 multicenter cohort study.
Setting: PICU admission following emergency transport in South East England, United Kingdom, from April 2014 to December 2016.
Patients: Children 0-16 years old ( n = 663) of whom 444 (67%) had suspected or confirmed infection.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: The PSS was calculated as a sum of four individual organ subscores (respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and coagulation) using the worst values during transport (i.e., from referral until the time of PICU admission). A score cutoff of greater than or equal to 2 points was used to define sepsis; and septic shock was defined as sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular subscore points. Sepsis occurred in 260 of 444 children (58.6%) with suspected or confirmed infection, with septic shock occurring in 177 of 260 (68.1%) of those with sepsis. A PSS score greater than or equal to 2 points occurred in 37 of 67 bronchiolitis cases, 19 of 35 meningoencephalitis cases, 30 of 47 pneumonia/empyema cases, 38 of 46 septic/toxic shock cases, nine of 15 severe sepsis cases, and 58 of 118 definite viral infections. Overall, 14 of 444 children died (3.2%). There were 12 deaths in the 260 children with PSS greater than or equal to 2, and two deaths in the 184 children with PSS less than 2 (4.6% vs. 1.1%; absolute difference, 3.5%; 95% CI, 0.1-6.9%; p = 0.04).
Conclusions: In 2014-2016, over half of the critically ill children undergoing emergency transport to PICU with presumed or confirmed infection, and meeting retrospectively applied PSS criteria for sepsis, had a range of clinical diagnoses including bronchiolitis, meningoencephalitis, and pneumonia/empyema. Furthermore, the PSS criteria for categorization of sepsis and septic shock were associated with outcome and may be of value in future risk-stratification in clinical trials.
目的:评估疑似或确诊感染需要紧急转运和PICU入院的儿童的特征和结局,并探讨2024 Phoenix脓毒症评分(PSS)标准与死亡率之间的关系。设计:回顾性分析2014-2016年多中心队列研究的整理数据。背景:2014年4月至2016年12月,英国英格兰东南部紧急转运后入院PICU。患者:0-16岁儿童(n = 663),其中444例(67%)疑似或确诊感染。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:PSS计算为四个单独器官评分(呼吸、心血管、神经和凝血)的总和,使用运输期间(即从转诊到PICU入院)的最差值。脓毒症采用大于或等于2分的评分截止;脓毒性休克定义为脓毒症加上1个或更多的心血管亚评分。444例疑似或确诊感染患儿中有260例(58.6%)发生脓毒症,260例脓毒症患儿中有177例(68.1%)发生脓毒症休克。67例细支气管炎患者中有37例PSS评分大于等于2分,35例脑膜脑炎患者中有19例,47例肺炎/脓肿患者中有30例,46例脓毒症/中毒性休克患者中有38例,15例严重脓毒症患者中有9例,118例明确病毒感染患者中有58例。总体而言,444名儿童中有14人死亡(3.2%)。260例大于或等于2的PSS患儿中有12例死亡,184例小于2的PSS患儿中有2例死亡(4.6% vs. 1.1%;绝对差,3.5%;95% ci, 0.1-6.9%;P = 0.04)。结论:2014-2016年,超过半数推定或确诊感染并符合回顾性应用PSS脓毒症标准的危重患儿被紧急送往PICU,其临床诊断包括细支气管炎、脑膜脑炎和肺炎/脓胸。此外,PSS对脓毒症和脓毒性休克的分类标准与结果相关,可能对未来临床试验中的风险分层有价值。
{"title":"Evaluation of Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Exploratory Analysis of Characteristics and Outcomes in an Emergency Transport PICU Cohort From the United Kingdom, 2014-2016.","authors":"Michael J Carter, Joshua Hageman, Yael Feinstein, Jethro Herberg, Myrsini Kaforou, Mark J Peters, Simon Nadel, Naomi Edmonds, Nazima Pathan, Michael Levin, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess characteristics and outcomes of children with suspected or confirmed infection requiring emergency transport and PICU admission and to explore the association between the 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score (PSS) criteria and mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of curated data from a 2014-2016 multicenter cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICU admission following emergency transport in South East England, United Kingdom, from April 2014 to December 2016.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 0-16 years old ( n = 663) of whom 444 (67%) had suspected or confirmed infection.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The PSS was calculated as a sum of four individual organ subscores (respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and coagulation) using the worst values during transport (i.e., from referral until the time of PICU admission). A score cutoff of greater than or equal to 2 points was used to define sepsis; and septic shock was defined as sepsis plus 1 or more cardiovascular subscore points. Sepsis occurred in 260 of 444 children (58.6%) with suspected or confirmed infection, with septic shock occurring in 177 of 260 (68.1%) of those with sepsis. A PSS score greater than or equal to 2 points occurred in 37 of 67 bronchiolitis cases, 19 of 35 meningoencephalitis cases, 30 of 47 pneumonia/empyema cases, 38 of 46 septic/toxic shock cases, nine of 15 severe sepsis cases, and 58 of 118 definite viral infections. Overall, 14 of 444 children died (3.2%). There were 12 deaths in the 260 children with PSS greater than or equal to 2, and two deaths in the 184 children with PSS less than 2 (4.6% vs. 1.1%; absolute difference, 3.5%; 95% CI, 0.1-6.9%; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 2014-2016, over half of the critically ill children undergoing emergency transport to PICU with presumed or confirmed infection, and meeting retrospectively applied PSS criteria for sepsis, had a range of clinical diagnoses including bronchiolitis, meningoencephalitis, and pneumonia/empyema. Furthermore, the PSS criteria for categorization of sepsis and septic shock were associated with outcome and may be of value in future risk-stratification in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e186-e196"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142922431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662
Mark W Hall, Rakesh Lodha, Niranjan Kissoon, Adrienne G Randolph
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 3, What About Using Stages of Sepsis in the Criteria?","authors":"Mark W Hall, Rakesh Lodha, Niranjan Kissoon, Adrienne G Randolph","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e256-e261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664
R Scott Watson, Andrew C Argent, Lauren R Sorce, Adrienne G Randolph, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Tellen D Bennett, Niranjan Kissoon, Luregn J Schlapbach
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 1, the Evolution in Definition of Sepsis and Septic Shock.","authors":"R Scott Watson, Andrew C Argent, Lauren R Sorce, Adrienne G Randolph, L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto, Tellen D Bennett, Niranjan Kissoon, Luregn J Schlapbach","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003664","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e246-e251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672
Claudio Flauzino de Oliveira, Idris Evans, Andrew C Argent, Rakesh Lodha, Kusum Menon
{"title":"The 2024 Phoenix Sepsis Score Criteria: Part 2, What About Using Interventions in the Criteria?","authors":"Claudio Flauzino de Oliveira, Idris Evans, Andrew C Argent, Rakesh Lodha, Kusum Menon","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003672","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e252-e255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-09-20DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612
Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga
Objectives: To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.
Design: Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.
Setting: In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.
Subjects: Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.
Conclusions: Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.
{"title":"Pediatric Resuscitation Skill of Bag-Tube Manual Ventilation: Developing and Using a Mobile Simulation Program to Assess Competency of a Multiprofessional PICU Team.","authors":"Anna E McCormick, Stuart H Friess, Kimberly S Quayle, John C Lin, Arushi Manga","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the skill of bag-tube manual ventilation with the flow-inflating bag in multiprofessional PICU team members using a mobile simulation unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study from January 2022 to April 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In situ mobile simulation using the flow-inflating bag in an academic PICU.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members including nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, fellows, and attendings.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We enrolled 129 participants who twice completed 1-minute tasks performing bag-tube manual ventilation with a flow-inflating bag. Sessions were video recorded; four could not be analyzed. Only 30% of participants reported being very to extremely confident, and the majority (62%) reported infrequent skill performance. Task success was defined as achieving target pressure ranges during 80% of the delivered breaths, respiratory rate (RR) of 25-35 breaths/min, and successful pop-off valve engagement. Only five of 129 participants (4%) achieved successful ventilation as defined. Overall, participants were more likely to deliver lower pressures and faster rate. Maintaining target positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was least likely to be achieved (19% success), followed by RR (52%), pop-off valve (64%), then peak inspiratory pressure (71%). Nurses were less likely to achieve target pressures compared with all other professions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiprofessional PICU team members have highly variable self-confidence with bag-tube manual ventilation using a flow-inflating bag. Observed performance demonstrates rare success with achieving targeted ventilation parameters, in particular maintenance of PEEP. Future research should focus on developing mobile simulation units to facilitate profession-specific, real-time coaching to teach high-quality manual ventilation that can be translated to the bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e206-e215"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142471873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671
Ronald A Bronicki, Sebastian C Tume, Saul Flores, Rohit S Loomba, Nirica M Borges, Daniel J Penny, Daniel Burkhoff
{"title":"Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insight From a Cardiovascular Simulator.","authors":"Ronald A Bronicki, Sebastian C Tume, Saul Flores, Rohit S Loomba, Nirica M Borges, Daniel J Penny, Daniel Burkhoff","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003671","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e272-e277"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667
John M VanBuren, Sharon D Yeatts, Richard Holubkov, Frank W Moler, Alexis Topjian, Kent Page, Robert G Clevenger, William J Meurer
Objectives: To determine the optimal cooling duration for children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using an adaptive Bayesian trial design.
Design: The Pediatric Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP) trial is a randomized, response-adaptive duration/dose-finding clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants are randomized to one of several cooling durations (0, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, or 96 hr). The first 150 participants are randomized 1:1:1 to 24-, 48-, and 72-hour durations. Response-adaptive randomization is used thereafter to allocate participants based on emerging duration-response data.
Setting: PICUs.
Patients: Up to 900 pediatric patients 2 days to younger than 18 years old who have survived OHCA and been admitted to an ICU.
Interventions: Duration of targeted temperature management using a surface temperature control device.
Measurements and main results: The primary outcome is the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition mortality composite score, assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category and Pediatric Resuscitation after Cardiac Arrest scores, as well as survival at 12 months. Bayesian modeling is employed to evaluate the duration-response curve and determine the optimal cooling duration. The trial is designed to adaptively update randomization probabilities every 10 weeks, maximizing the allocation of participants to potentially optimal cooling durations. Over 90% power is achieved for the hypothesized scenarios.
Conclusions: The P-ICECAP trial aims to identify the shortest cooling duration that provides the maximum treatment effect for pediatric OHCA patients. The adaptive design allows for flexibility and efficiency in handling various clinical scenarios, potentially transforming pediatric cardiac arrest care by optimizing hypothermia treatment protocols.
{"title":"The Pediatric Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP): Statistical Methods Planned in the Bayesian, Adaptive, Duration Finding Trial.","authors":"John M VanBuren, Sharon D Yeatts, Richard Holubkov, Frank W Moler, Alexis Topjian, Kent Page, Robert G Clevenger, William J Meurer","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the optimal cooling duration for children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) using an adaptive Bayesian trial design.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pediatric Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (P-ICECAP) trial is a randomized, response-adaptive duration/dose-finding clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. Participants are randomized to one of several cooling durations (0, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, or 96 hr). The first 150 participants are randomized 1:1:1 to 24-, 48-, and 72-hour durations. Response-adaptive randomization is used thereafter to allocate participants based on emerging duration-response data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>PICUs.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Up to 900 pediatric patients 2 days to younger than 18 years old who have survived OHCA and been admitted to an ICU.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Duration of targeted temperature management using a surface temperature control device.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome is the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition mortality composite score, assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category and Pediatric Resuscitation after Cardiac Arrest scores, as well as survival at 12 months. Bayesian modeling is employed to evaluate the duration-response curve and determine the optimal cooling duration. The trial is designed to adaptively update randomization probabilities every 10 weeks, maximizing the allocation of participants to potentially optimal cooling durations. Over 90% power is achieved for the hypothesized scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The P-ICECAP trial aims to identify the shortest cooling duration that provides the maximum treatment effect for pediatric OHCA patients. The adaptive design allows for flexibility and efficiency in handling various clinical scenarios, potentially transforming pediatric cardiac arrest care by optimizing hypothermia treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e227-e236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142854369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646
Mizue Kishida, Robert A Berg, Natalie Napolitano, John Berkenbosch, Andrea Talukdar, Philipp Jung, Matthew P Malone, Simon J Parsons, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Sholeen Nett, Lily Glater, Conrad Krawiec, Asha Shenoi, Awni Al-Subu, Lee Polikoff, Serena P Kelly, Carolyn K Adams, John S Giuliano, Shashikanth Ambati, David Tellez, Rebecca J Martin, Anthony Lee, Ryan K Breuer, Katherine V Biagas, Palen P Mallory, Kelly L Corbett, G Kris Bysani, Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Samantha Wirkowski, Matthew Pinto, Megan Toal, Rachel K Marlow, Michelle Adu-Darko, Justine Shults, Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki
Objectives: Tracheal intubation (TI) is a critical skill for PICU attending physicians to maintain. We hypothesize that attendings perform fewer TIs and have lower success rate in PICU programs with a Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship.
Design: Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) from July 2016 to June 2020. Exposures were presence of PCCM fellowship and attending TI skill maintenance program (SMP). The primary outcome was attending's first attempt success and the secondary outcome was adverse airway outcome in the first attempt.
Setting: Thirty-three PICUs in North America.
Patients: Children receiving TI.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Overall, 23 of 33 PICUs had a PCCM fellowship with three of 23 having an attending TI SMP. Attendings performed TI in 24.1% (2,728/11,323): 13.9% (13.8 TI/yr per PICU) in PICUs with a fellowship vs. 66.0% (36.6 TI/yr per PICU) without a fellowship (p < 0.001). Attending first attempt success in PICUs with vs. without fellowships was 70.5% vs. 81.3% (difference, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.6-14.0%]; p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounders, attendings in a PICU with a fellowship had lower odds for first attempt success (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.90]). We failed to find an association between attending first attempt success and PICU program type, with vs. without a TI SMP (74.0% vs. 69.5%; p = 0.146). The adverse airway outcome rate of the TI with attending's first attempt was lower in PICU programs with vs. without a TI SMP (32.8% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.020). However, after adjusting for confounders, we failed to exclude the possibility of near halving of odds of adverse outcome (aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55-1.01]; p = 0.058).
Conclusions: Attendings in PICU programs with a fellowship have fewer opportunities to perform TI and lower first attempt success rates. Opportunities exist for attending TI skill maintenance, especially in PICUs with a PCCM fellowship.
{"title":"Tracheal Intubation by Attending Physicians in a U.S. Registry, 2016-2020: Analysis by PICU Participation in a Skills Maintenance Program and Fellowship Training.","authors":"Mizue Kishida, Robert A Berg, Natalie Napolitano, John Berkenbosch, Andrea Talukdar, Philipp Jung, Matthew P Malone, Simon J Parsons, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Sholeen Nett, Lily Glater, Conrad Krawiec, Asha Shenoi, Awni Al-Subu, Lee Polikoff, Serena P Kelly, Carolyn K Adams, John S Giuliano, Shashikanth Ambati, David Tellez, Rebecca J Martin, Anthony Lee, Ryan K Breuer, Katherine V Biagas, Palen P Mallory, Kelly L Corbett, G Kris Bysani, Laurence Ducharme-Crevier, Samantha Wirkowski, Matthew Pinto, Megan Toal, Rachel K Marlow, Michelle Adu-Darko, Justine Shults, Vinay Nadkarni, Akira Nishisaki","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646","DOIUrl":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Tracheal intubation (TI) is a critical skill for PICU attending physicians to maintain. We hypothesize that attendings perform fewer TIs and have lower success rate in PICU programs with a Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) from July 2016 to June 2020. Exposures were presence of PCCM fellowship and attending TI skill maintenance program (SMP). The primary outcome was attending's first attempt success and the secondary outcome was adverse airway outcome in the first attempt.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-three PICUs in North America.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children receiving TI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Overall, 23 of 33 PICUs had a PCCM fellowship with three of 23 having an attending TI SMP. Attendings performed TI in 24.1% (2,728/11,323): 13.9% (13.8 TI/yr per PICU) in PICUs with a fellowship vs. 66.0% (36.6 TI/yr per PICU) without a fellowship (p < 0.001). Attending first attempt success in PICUs with vs. without fellowships was 70.5% vs. 81.3% (difference, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.6-14.0%]; p < 0.0001). After controlling for confounders, attendings in a PICU with a fellowship had lower odds for first attempt success (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.65 [95% CI, 0.47-0.90]). We failed to find an association between attending first attempt success and PICU program type, with vs. without a TI SMP (74.0% vs. 69.5%; p = 0.146). The adverse airway outcome rate of the TI with attending's first attempt was lower in PICU programs with vs. without a TI SMP (32.8% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.020). However, after adjusting for confounders, we failed to exclude the possibility of near halving of odds of adverse outcome (aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.55-1.01]; p = 0.058).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Attendings in PICU programs with a fellowship have fewer opportunities to perform TI and lower first attempt success rates. Opportunities exist for attending TI skill maintenance, especially in PICUs with a PCCM fellowship.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"e166-e176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11850027/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143468745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}