Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety最新文献

Purpose: Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA to treat various autoimmune conditions. This study assessed its adverse events by analyzing reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: FAERS data from Q3 2019 to Q4 2023 were extracted, and disproportionality analyses were conducted using four statistical measures, reporting odds ratio, proportionate reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean.

Results: A total of 6 879 398 adverse event reports were collected, with 37 700 reports identifying upadacitinib as the "primary suspected." These reports involved 24 system organ classes and 246 preferred terms that met the criteria across all four algorithms. The distribution of adverse events was assessed separately for female and male patients. Further analysis of the top 25 preferred terms revealed that, although the system organ classes were similar between sexes, the specific adverse events differed. The adverse events were analyzed by gender, showing musculoskeletal and skin disorders were prevalent and severe in male patients, while musculoskeletal issues, infections, and abnormal laboratory tests were common in female patients. Unexpected events like trigger finger, biliary sepsis, and serious events such as oral neoplasm were also identified.

Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence for the safety evaluation of upadacitinib and underscores the need to monitor sex-specific adverse events. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these pharmacovigilance findings.

Purpose: To analyze the prescription patterns and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy in Belgium, and to investigate their potential association with congenital anomalies.

Methods: Using a nationwide linked database, we identified antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics via the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical Classification (ATC) codes. For each medication group, we calculated the overall prevalence and prevalence for the three most used medications at the fifth ATC level. Sociodemographic factors influencing medication use during pregnancy were analyzed, and potential associations with congenital anomalies were investigated through logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations.

Results: Overall, 828 016 live births pregnancies associated with 611 094 mothers were identified. We found that the use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics was decreasing with the arrival of pregnancy. Mothers with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to these medications. Antiepileptics used in the first trimester were associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.11-2.45) compared with unexposed women. The three most used antiepileptics were lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam, among them, we found an association with congenital anomalies only for valproate (aOR = 3.92, 95% CI 2.30-6.67).

Conclusions: Psychotropic and antiepileptic drug use decreased during pregnancy. Pregnant women with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to psychotropics and antiepileptics during pregnancy. The elevated risk of congenital anomalies associated with antiepileptics use, particularly valproate, underscores the need for targeted interventions and increased awareness to improve maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the awareness of oral retinoid teratogenicity and the adherence to the pregnancy prevention program (PPP) related to oral retinoid use by physicians, pharmacists, and patients in Denmark.

Methods: As part of the multi-country survey, web-based questionnaires were distributed among Danish dermatologists, general practitioners, community pharmacists, and women of childbearing age, who were using or had used oral retinoids within the past 5 years.

Results: A total of 62 physicians, 96 pharmacists, and 50 oral retinoid using women responded; 95%, 100%, and 98%, respectively, were aware of the teratogenic risks of oral retinoids. For physicians, the most applied PPP measures were the usage of the patient (44%) and the healthcare professional (19%) guides, while the least applied measure was signing medication risk awareness form (3%). Among the pharmacists, the warning sign on the outer medication package was the most used measure (45%). Among the women, a majority (90%) had read the patient information leaflet included in the medication package and 72% discussed the use of contraception with their healthcare provider, while risk awareness forms and patient cards were seen by only few.

Conclusions: In Denmark, physicians, pharmacists, and medicine users were aware about the teratogenic effects of oral retinoids. Adherence to pregnancy prevention measures varied, suggesting unwillingness to use the measures that require patients' signatures among physicians and a lack of awareness of pharmacy targeting measures. Accessibility of the latter measures need to be optimized to improve the safety of oral retinoid use.

Purpose: The optimal design for pharmacoepidemiologic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies is unclear. Using the association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin and the risk of severe hypoglycemia as a case study, a DDI with little or no clinical impact, we tested whether the prevalent new-user design can be applied in the area.

Methods: Among all patients initiating sulfonylureas in the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1998-2020), we identified those adding-on warfarin while on a sulfonylurea. For each co-exposed patient, we defined a prescription-based exposure set including other sulfonylurea users not adding-on warfarin (comparators). Within each exposure set, we matched each co-exposed patient to five comparators on time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS) and followed them using an as-treated approach. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycemia associated with concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin compared to use of sulfonylureas alone. Sensitivity analyses addressed the impact of different potential sources of bias.

Results: The study cohort included 17 890 patients co-exposed to sulfonylureas and warfarin and 88 749 matched comparators. After TCPS matching, patient characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Compared to use of sulfonylureas alone, concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin was not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis (HRs ranging from 1.01 to 1.15, all not statistically significant).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the prevalent new-user design could be used for the assessment of clinical effects of DDIs.

Purpose: On August 20, 2020, the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication (DSC) along with labeling updates to inform the public about a small increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) associated with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) use. This study aims to assess whether the DSC impacted HCTZ use in the U.S.

Methods: We conducted a trend analysis in the Sentinel Distributed Database using national healthcare administrative data from January 2017 to November 2022. We identified two cohorts each month: An overall cohort of all enrollees and a skin cancer cohort of those with a history of NMSC. For each cohort, we plotted the monthly proportion of patients receiving HCTZ-containing products among those receiving any thiazide diuretics. We performed interrupted time series analyses to quantify the impact of the DSC on these monthly proportions. Secondary analyses were conducted on the proportion of HCTZ users among patients receiving any antihypertensives.

Results: In the overall cohort, the DSC was only associated with a statistically significant but clinically negligible trend change of monthly HCTZ proportion within this cohort (0.018%; 95% CI, 0.012%-0.025%). Similar results were observed in the skin cancer cohort. The secondary analysis found no significant level change or trend change in the monthly proportion of HCTZ use among antihypertensive users.

Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in HCTZ use following the DSC about its NMSC risk, among the overall population and those with a history of NMSC. Our findings were in accordance with the DSC recommendation.

Purpose: Prior approval for reimbursement is a policy of cost containment while ensuring oversight and governance of medicines. It has been employed in Ireland to address financial challenges due to the shift from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Studies assessing the effectiveness of this policy are limited. Thus, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of prior approval for reimbursement of DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban) as a cost containment policy in Ireland.

Methods: The Irish Health Service Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Service database was used in this cross-sectional study. We examined the prescribing frequencies and associated costs of the oral anticoagulants; [(OACs) apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin] listed in the top 100 most frequently prescribed drugs, between 2018 and 2021. Time series negative binomial regression was used to assess the impact of removing the approval requirement of apixaban in September 2019 followed by the other DOACs in November 2020.

Results: The prescribing frequency of OACs increased by almost 20% from 2018 to 2021. This study showed there were significant differences in the proportion of OACs prescribed among the Community Drug Schemes. A statistically significant decreased use of apixaban (< 1%, p < 0.05) occurred when prior approval was removed for all DOACs.

Conclusions: The removal of prior approval for reimbursement of DOACs in Ireland had a minimal impact on the prescribing frequency trends of the OACs. Future use of these potentially useful policies by healthcare systems requires careful consideration of drug type, approval criteria and length of time the policy remains in place to minimise any negative effects associated with their use.

Purpose: To illustrate the interest in using interrupted time series (ITS) methods, this study evaluated the impact of the UK MHRA's March 2019 Risk Minimisation Measures (RMM) on fluoroquinolone usage.

Methods: Monthly and quarterly fluoroquinolone use incidence rates from 2012 to 2022 were analysed across hospital care (Barts Health NHS Trust), primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum and CPRD GOLD), and linked records from both settings (East Scotland). Rates were stratified by age (19-59 and ≥ 60 years old). Seasonality-adjusted segmented regression and ARIMA models were employed to model quarterly and monthly rates, respectively.

Results: Post-RMM, with segmented regression, both age groups in Barts Health experienced nearly complete reductions (> 99%); CPRD Aurum saw 20.19% (19-59) and 19.29% ( $\ge$  60) reductions; no significant changes in CPRD GOLD; East Scotland had 45.43% (19-59) and 41.47% ( $\ge$  60) decreases. Slope analysis indicated increases for East Scotland (19-59) and both CPRD Aurum groups, but a decrease for CPRD GOLD's $\ge$  60; ARIMA detected significant step changes in CPRD GOLD not identified by segmented regression and noted a significant slope increase in Barts Health's 19-59 group. Both models showed no post-modelling autocorrelations across databases, yet Barts Health's residuals were non-normally distributed with non-constant variance.

Conclusions: Both segmented regression and ARIMA confirmed the reduction of fluoroquinolones use after RMM across four different UK primary care and hospital databases. Model diagnostics showed good performance in eliminating residual autocorrelation for both methods. However, diagnostics for hospital databases with low incident use revealed the presence of heteroscedasticity and non-normal white noise using both methods.

Purpose: The relationship between heart failure (HF) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women remains unclear. This paper aimed to elucidate the association between HRT and HF outcomes in postmenopausal women by scrutinizing evidence from clinical trials and observational studies.

Methods: The meta-analysis was systematically executed following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies identified from the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, ICTRP, and NIH clinical trials. The primary endpoint of the effect comprised risk ratios (RR) for HF incidence and mortality, attended by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed employing the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies.

Results: The search yielded a total of eight reports, originating from six individual studies, for inclusion in the current study, and 25 047 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated no remarkable association between HRT and the incidence of HF in postmenopausal women (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.91-1.25, p = 0.37). However, a significant reduction in all-cause mortality was observed among post-menopausal HF patients who received HRT (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49-0.87, p = 0.003). In age-related subgroup analyses, no significant change in the risk of HF was noticed among participants on HRT.

Conclusions: The findings of this paper demonstrate that HRT use is not associated with a significant increase in the risk of incident HF. This meta-analysis also suggests a benefit in all-cause mortality when HRT is administered to postmenopausal women with HF.