Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety最新文献

Purpose: There is increasing recognition of the importance of transparency and reproducibility in scientific research. This study aimed to quantify the extent to which programming code is publicly shared in pharmacoepidemiology, and to develop a set of recommendations on this topic.

Methods: We conducted a literature review identifying all studies published in Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (PDS) between 2017 and 2022. Data were extracted on the frequency and types of programming code shared, and other key open science practices (clinical codelist sharing, data sharing, study preregistration, and stated use of reporting guidelines and preprinting). We developed six recommendations for investigators who choose to share code and gathered feedback from members of the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE).

Results: Programming code sharing by articles published in PDS ranged from 1.8% in 2017 to 9.5% in 2022. It was more prevalent among articles with a methodological focus, simulation studies, and papers which also shared record-level data.

Conclusion: Programming code sharing is rare but increasing in pharmacoepidemiology studies published in PDS. We recommend improved reporting of whether code is shared and how available code can be accessed. When sharing programming code, we recommend the use of permanent digital identifiers, appropriate licenses, and, where possible, adherence to good software practices around the provision of metadata and documentation, computational reproducibility, and data privacy.

Purpose: The magnitude of repeat exposures to culprit medications after hospital discharge is not well studied. We combined prospective cohort data with administrative health data to understand the frequency of repeat exposures to culprit medications after discharge and the risk factors for their occurrence.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of three prospective cohorts of patients who presented to the hospital with an adverse drug event in British Columbia, from 2008 to 2015 (n = 849). We linked prospectively identified adverse drug events to administrative data to examine patterns of redispensing of culprit medications. We used Cox regression to assess risk factors for re-exposure, and conducted subgroup analyses for essential vs. nonessential medications.

Results: Among 849 diagnosed adverse drug events, 45.2% had subsequent culprit medication redispensing within a year of hospital discharge. The factors associated with re-exposures included atrial fibrillation, adverse drug event type (e.g. adverse reaction), culprit medication type, and longer historical duration of medication use.

Conclusions: Re-exposures to culprit medications occurred in almost half of the adverse drug events diagnosed in emergency departments. Many of these were appropriate re-exposures to essential medications for indications in which the risk of uncontrolled disease likely outweighed the risk of a repeat adverse event. More research is needed to understand re-exposures to nonessential medications or medications with safer alternatives.

Purpose: Sickle cell disease (SCD) affects all organ systems and is characterized by numerous acute and chronic complications and comorbidities. Standardized codes are needed for complications/comorbidities used in real-world evidence (RWE) studies that rely on administrative and medical coding. This systematic literature review was conducted to produce a comprehensive list of complications/comorbidities associated with SCD, along with their diagnosis codes used in RWE studies.

Methods: A search in MEDLINE and Embase identified studies published from 2016 to 2023. Studies were included if they were conducted in US SCD populations and reported complications/comorbidities and respective International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification (ICD-CM) codes. All identified complications/comorbidities and codes were reviewed by a certified medical coding expert and hematologist.

Results: Of 1851 identified studies, 39 studies were included. The most reported complications/comorbidities were stroke, acute chest syndrome, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, and vaso-occlusive crisis. Most of the studies used ICD-9-CM codes (n = 21), while some studies used ICD-10-CM codes (n = 3) or both (n = 15), depending on the study period. Most codes reported in literature were heterogeneous across complications/comorbidities. The medical coding expert and hematologist recommended modifications for several conditions.

Conclusion: While many studies we identified did not report their codes and were excluded from this review, the studies with codes exhibited diverse coding definitions. By providing a standardized set of diagnosis codes that were reported by studies and reviewed by a coding expert and hematologist, our review can serve as a foundation for accurately identifying complications/comorbidities in future research, and may reduce heterogeneity, enhance transparency, and improve reproducibility. Future efforts focused on validating these code lists are needed.

Purpose: There has been rapid growth in the variety and number of real-world data (RWD) sources, as well as the number of regulatory documents that provide guidance for assessing the suitability of RWD sources for pharmacoepidemiology studies. This study aims to assess differences in RWD guidance and variability in current practice for identifying and assessing RWD for studies with regulatory purpose.

Methods: Key criteria for feasibility assessment were mapped against relevant regulatory guidance documents across US, EU, and Asia-Pacific regions. An online survey was designed and deployed to International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology members to understand current practice. Findings were summarized and used to inform key considerations and recommendations.

Results: Eleven RWD guidance documents were identified and mapped against 14 RWD assessment criteria. Variability was seen across these documents in guidance for these criteria. Between December 2022 and January 2023, 37 survey respondents reported having used RWD for post-marketing commitments (34, 92%) and/or background epidemiology (28, 76%). RWD were mostly identified through literature (33, 89%) and data landscaping (26, 70%); guidance documents referenced included: Food and Drug Administration (20, 54%), European Network for Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (17, 46%), European Medical Agency (16, 43%), and Structured Process to Identify Fit-For-Purpose Data (11, 30%). Challenges for conducting feasibility assessments included RWD accessibility, ability to complete validation, and RWD provider responsiveness.

Conclusions: Existing guidelines are used extensively by researchers, but key criteria for RWD identification and feasibility assessment are not reflected consistently and challenges remain. Recommendations have been made reflecting study findings.