Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1055/a-2195-1499
Sigrid Breit, Agnes Meyer, Wolfgang Schmitt, Tobias Bracht, Sebastian Walther
Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is known to be effective in the treatment of catatonia, reaching response rates of about 80 to 100%. It is indicated in cases of treatment resistance to benzodiazepines and in life-threatening conditions such as malignant catatonia. Beneficial effects on specific symptoms or predictors of response are less clear. The objective of this retrospective study is to examine the ECT effect on specific catatonia symptoms in the acute phase of the illness and to identify predictors of response.
Methods: A retrospective study examined data from 20 patients with catatonia, 18 associated with schizophrenia and 2 with bipolar disorder, who underwent ECT from 2008 to 2021. Ten subjects had more than one ECT-series, resulting in a total of 31 ECT-series. Catatonia symptom severity was assessed with the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS).
Results: ECT yielded excellent response. Nineteen of 20 patients and 30 of 31 ECT-series achieved response. The mean number of ECT sessions to response was 4.2. Response to ECT was more pronounced for motor inhibition symptoms such as stupor and mutism, while echophenomena, dyskinesia, stereotypy and perseveration responded less well. A predictor of late response was the presence of grasp reflex.
Discussion: The present study corroborates the high and rapid effectiveness of ECT in the treatment of catatonia. Focus on single catatonia signs may help to identify those who are most likely to achieve remission quickly, as well as those who might need longer ECT-series.
{"title":"The Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Specific Catatonia Symptoms and Predictors of Late Response.","authors":"Sigrid Breit, Agnes Meyer, Wolfgang Schmitt, Tobias Bracht, Sebastian Walther","doi":"10.1055/a-2195-1499","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2195-1499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is known to be effective in the treatment of catatonia, reaching response rates of about 80 to 100%. It is indicated in cases of treatment resistance to benzodiazepines and in life-threatening conditions such as malignant catatonia. Beneficial effects on specific symptoms or predictors of response are less clear. The objective of this retrospective study is to examine the ECT effect on specific catatonia symptoms in the acute phase of the illness and to identify predictors of response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study examined data from 20 patients with catatonia, 18 associated with schizophrenia and 2 with bipolar disorder, who underwent ECT from 2008 to 2021. Ten subjects had more than one ECT-series, resulting in a total of 31 ECT-series. Catatonia symptom severity was assessed with the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECT yielded excellent response. Nineteen of 20 patients and 30 of 31 ECT-series achieved response. The mean number of ECT sessions to response was 4.2. Response to ECT was more pronounced for motor inhibition symptoms such as stupor and mutism, while echophenomena, dyskinesia, stereotypy and perseveration responded less well. A predictor of late response was the presence of grasp reflex.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The present study corroborates the high and rapid effectiveness of ECT in the treatment of catatonia. Focus on single catatonia signs may help to identify those who are most likely to achieve remission quickly, as well as those who might need longer ECT-series.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138299809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-09-18DOI: 10.1055/a-2153-4370
Vincent Eggart, Matin Mortazavi, Sophie-Kathrin Kirchner, Daniel Keeser, Lisa Brandstetter, Alkomiet Hasan, Elias Wagner
Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviour is frequently observed in children and adolescents with psychiatric conditions. Affected individuals are regularly treated with psychotropic drugs, although the impact of these agents on NSSI behaviour remains elusive.
Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review from clinical routine data in a large cohort (N=1140) of adolescent inpatients with primary affective and non-affective psychiatric disorders according to ICD-10 (mean age=15.3±1.3 years; 72.6% female). Four separate mixed regression models compared the frequency of NSSI between treatment periods without any medication and four medication categories (benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), high- and low-potency antipsychotics).
Results: In those individuals with affective disorders as the primary diagnosis, periods without medication were associated with significantly lower NSSI/day compared to all four other medication conditions (benzodiazepines p<10-8, antidepressants/SSRIs p=0.0004, high-potency antipsychotics p=0.0009, low-potency antipsychotics p<10 -4). In individuals with a primary diagnosis other than an affective disorder, NSSI was significantly lower during the period without medication compared to the treatment periods with benzodiazepines (p=0.005) and antidepressants/SSRIs (p=0.01). However, NSSI rates in the no-medication condition were comparable to NSSI rates under high-potency (p=0.89) and low-potency antipsychotics (p=0.53).
Conclusions: The occurrence of NSSI correlates with the treatment with a psychotropic drug in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Due to the retrospective design, it remains elusive to what extent psychotropic drugs might alter the frequency of NSSI in adolescents or if NSSI might indicate a transdiagnostic feature of more pronounced disease severity.
{"title":"Association of Four Medication Classes and Non-suicidal Self-injury in Adolescents with Affective Disorders - A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Vincent Eggart, Matin Mortazavi, Sophie-Kathrin Kirchner, Daniel Keeser, Lisa Brandstetter, Alkomiet Hasan, Elias Wagner","doi":"10.1055/a-2153-4370","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2153-4370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) behaviour is frequently observed in children and adolescents with psychiatric conditions. Affected individuals are regularly treated with psychotropic drugs, although the impact of these agents on NSSI behaviour remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review from clinical routine data in a large cohort (N=1140) of adolescent inpatients with primary affective and non-affective psychiatric disorders according to ICD-10 (mean age=15.3±1.3 years; 72.6% female). Four separate mixed regression models compared the frequency of NSSI between treatment periods without any medication and four medication categories (benzodiazepines, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), high- and low-potency antipsychotics).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In those individuals with affective disorders as the primary diagnosis, periods without medication were associated with significantly lower NSSI/day compared to all four other medication conditions (benzodiazepines p<10<sup>-8</sup>, antidepressants/SSRIs p=0.0004, high-potency antipsychotics p=0.0009, low-potency antipsychotics p<10 <sup>-4</sup>). In individuals with a primary diagnosis other than an affective disorder, NSSI was significantly lower during the period without medication compared to the treatment periods with benzodiazepines (p=0.005) and antidepressants/SSRIs (p=0.01). However, NSSI rates in the no-medication condition were comparable to NSSI rates under high-potency (p=0.89) and low-potency antipsychotics (p=0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The occurrence of NSSI correlates with the treatment with a psychotropic drug in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Due to the retrospective design, it remains elusive to what extent psychotropic drugs might alter the frequency of NSSI in adolescents or if NSSI might indicate a transdiagnostic feature of more pronounced disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10308026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1055/a-2197-9635
Peter Nyhuis, Dorothea Mücke, Michael Specka, Norbert Scherbaum
Objective: Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of injectable caffeine as an augmentation method in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This study investigated whether orally administered caffeine increases seizure duration during ECT.
Methods: Medical records of 40 patients treated with a series of ECT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure duration had dropped<30 s, or motor seizure duration<15 s were included. They subsequently received oral caffeine (0.2 g) before ECT sessions. Primary outcomes were EEG seizure duration and motor seizure duration, compared with those from the last pre-caffeine session (baseline) and the first five caffeine-augmented sessions. The mental state was assessed with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). In addition, data on maximum heart rate, maximal arterial pressure, and adverse effects were collected.
Results: The EEG seizure duration increased by 14.9 s (52%) on average between baseline and the first caffeine-augmented session. The increased length remained widely stable over the subsequent ECT sessions. EEG seizure duration was>30 s in more than 80% of sessions. A statistically significant increase in motor seizure duration appeared only in the 2nd and 3rd of five sessions with augmentation. Oral caffeine pretreatment was overall well tolerated. The percentage of patients with at least serious mental impairment (GAF score≤50) dropped from 77.5 to 15%.
Conclusions: Results suggest the utility of oral caffeine (0.2 g) to increase ECT-induced seizures in patients with durations below clinically significant thresholds.
{"title":"Augmentation of Electroconvulsive Therapy with Oral Caffeine: A Retrospective Analysis of 40 Patients with Major Depression.","authors":"Peter Nyhuis, Dorothea Mücke, Michael Specka, Norbert Scherbaum","doi":"10.1055/a-2197-9635","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2197-9635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of injectable caffeine as an augmentation method in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This study investigated whether orally administered caffeine increases seizure duration during ECT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 40 patients treated with a series of ECT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure duration had dropped<30 s, or motor seizure duration<15 s were included. They subsequently received oral caffeine (0.2 g) before ECT sessions. Primary outcomes were EEG seizure duration and motor seizure duration, compared with those from the last pre-caffeine session (baseline) and the first five caffeine-augmented sessions. The mental state was assessed with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). In addition, data on maximum heart rate, maximal arterial pressure, and adverse effects were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EEG seizure duration increased by 14.9 s (52%) on average between baseline and the first caffeine-augmented session. The increased length remained widely stable over the subsequent ECT sessions. EEG seizure duration was>30 s in more than 80% of sessions. A statistically significant increase in motor seizure duration appeared only in the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> of five sessions with augmentation. Oral caffeine pretreatment was overall well tolerated. The percentage of patients with at least serious mental impairment (GAF score≤50) dropped from 77.5 to 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest the utility of oral caffeine (0.2 g) to increase ECT-induced seizures in patients with durations below clinically significant thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"30-34"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138299808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-12-05DOI: 10.1055/a-2190-4842
Julian Wellensiek, Michael Specka, Johannes Just, Markus Banger, Udo Bonnet, Norbert Scherbaum
Introduction: Pharmacotherapy with drugs like naltrexone or acamprosate is a well-evaluated element in the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD). However, in many countries, these medications are rarely administered. The objective of the present study was to identify from patients' perspective factors that prevent the initiation and compliance with pharmacological treatment of AD.
Methods: Patients from inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment underwent a standardized interview. Questions included socio-demographic data, history of AD, treatment history, knowledge and personal experience regarding pharmacotherapy of AD, and personal views about the causes of AD.
Results: Three hundred patients (mean age 47.3 years, 27.7% female, mean duration of AD 8.9 years, 67% with a history of previous inpatient withdrawal treatment) were included. The majority of patients (58.7%) already knew drugs for the pharmacotherapy of AD. Thirty percent had ever used such medications, most often acamprosate. Except for disulfiram, pharmacotherapy of AD had lasted only a few weeks, on average. Medication usually had been applied without additional psychotherapy. No severe side effects were reported. Patients had often stopped pharmacotherapy on their own, when assuming they had reached stable abstinence. Openness to start pharmacotherapy for AD was currently stated by 67% of the total sample. In multiple logistic regression, openness was predicted by having a concept of AD as a medical disease and by a shorter duration of AD.
Discussion: To improve the administration of pharmacotherapy for AD implementation strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated with a focus on the concept of AD as a medical disease.
简介:使用纳曲酮或阿坎酸等药物进行药物治疗是治疗酒精依赖症(AD)的一个经过充分评估的方法。然而,在许多国家,这些药物很少被使用。本研究的目的是从患者的角度出发,找出阻碍他们开始并遵从药物治疗酒精依赖症的因素:方法:对接受戒酒治疗的住院患者进行标准化访谈。问题包括社会人口学数据、AD病史、治疗史、关于AD药物治疗的知识和个人经验,以及个人对AD病因的看法:共纳入 300 名患者(平均年龄 47.3 岁,27.7% 为女性,平均 AD 病程 8.9 年,67% 曾接受过住院戒断治疗)。大多数患者(58.7%)已经知道用于 AD 药物治疗的药物。30%的患者曾经使用过此类药物,其中最常见的是阿坎酸。除了双硫仑之外,对注意力缺失症的药物治疗平均只持续了几周。药物治疗通常不需要额外的心理治疗。没有关于严重副作用的报道。患者在假定自己已经达到稳定戒断时,往往会自行停止药物治疗。67%的样本目前表示愿意开始接受药物治疗。在多元逻辑回归中,将注意力缺失症视为一种医学疾病以及注意力缺失症病程较短的患者均表示愿意接受药物治疗:讨论:为改善对注意力缺失症药物治疗的管理,应系统地制定和评估实施策略,重点关注注意力缺失症作为一种医疗疾病的概念。
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Dependence.","authors":"Julian Wellensiek, Michael Specka, Johannes Just, Markus Banger, Udo Bonnet, Norbert Scherbaum","doi":"10.1055/a-2190-4842","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2190-4842","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacotherapy with drugs like naltrexone or acamprosate is a well-evaluated element in the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD). However, in many countries, these medications are rarely administered. The objective of the present study was to identify from patients' perspective factors that prevent the initiation and compliance with pharmacological treatment of AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment underwent a standardized interview. Questions included socio-demographic data, history of AD, treatment history, knowledge and personal experience regarding pharmacotherapy of AD, and personal views about the causes of AD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred patients (mean age 47.3 years, 27.7% female, mean duration of AD 8.9 years, 67% with a history of previous inpatient withdrawal treatment) were included. The majority of patients (58.7%) already knew drugs for the pharmacotherapy of AD. Thirty percent had ever used such medications, most often acamprosate. Except for disulfiram, pharmacotherapy of AD had lasted only a few weeks, on average. Medication usually had been applied without additional psychotherapy. No severe side effects were reported. Patients had often stopped pharmacotherapy on their own, when assuming they had reached stable abstinence. Openness to start pharmacotherapy for AD was currently stated by 67% of the total sample. In multiple logistic regression, openness was predicted by having a concept of AD as a medical disease and by a shorter duration of AD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To improve the administration of pharmacotherapy for AD implementation strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated with a focus on the concept of AD as a medical disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"21-29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138488192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2023-10-16DOI: 10.1055/a-2179-8884
Kengo Yonezawa, Hiroyuki Uchida, Taisuke Yatomi, Yohei Ohtani, Kie Nomoto-Takahashi, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Hideaki Tani
Introduction: Predictors of treatment response to intravenous ketamine remain unclear in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD); therefore, this study aimed to clarify these predictors using the US National Institutes of Health database of clinical trials.
Methods: Data from a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial were used to assess the efficacy of intravenous ketamine in adult patients with TRD (NCT01920555). For the analysis, data were used from the participants who had received therapeutic doses of intravenous ketamine (i. e., 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg). Logistic and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to explore the demographic and clinical factors associated with response to treatment or changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 items (HAM-D-6) total score.
Results: This study included 31 patients with TRD (13 women; mean±standard deviation age, 48.4±10.9 years). Logistic regression analysis showed that the age of onset was positively correlated with treatment response after three days of ketamine administration (β=0.08, p=0.037); however, no association was observed between treatment response and age, sex, baseline HAM-D-6 total score, or dissociative score assessed with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale 40 min after ketamine infusion. Multiple regression analysis showed that no factors were correlated significantly with the percentage change in the HAM-D-6 total score three days after ketamine administration.
Discussion: Later disease onset correlates with a better treatment response three days after ketamine infusion in patients with TRD. Glutamatergic signal transmission may be impaired in patients with an earlier onset of depression, resulting in decreased neuroplasticity, which diminishes ketamine response.
{"title":"Factors Associated with Antidepressant Effects of Ketamine: A Reanalysis of Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intravenous Ketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression.","authors":"Kengo Yonezawa, Hiroyuki Uchida, Taisuke Yatomi, Yohei Ohtani, Kie Nomoto-Takahashi, Shinichiro Nakajima, Masaru Mimura, Hideaki Tani","doi":"10.1055/a-2179-8884","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2179-8884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Predictors of treatment response to intravenous ketamine remain unclear in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD); therefore, this study aimed to clarify these predictors using the US National Institutes of Health database of clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized controlled trial were used to assess the efficacy of intravenous ketamine in adult patients with TRD (NCT01920555). For the analysis, data were used from the participants who had received therapeutic doses of intravenous ketamine (i. e., 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg). Logistic and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to explore the demographic and clinical factors associated with response to treatment or changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 items (HAM-D-6) total score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 31 patients with TRD (13 women; mean±standard deviation age, 48.4±10.9 years). Logistic regression analysis showed that the age of onset was positively correlated with treatment response after three days of ketamine administration (β=0.08, p=0.037); however, no association was observed between treatment response and age, sex, baseline HAM-D-6 total score, or dissociative score assessed with the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale 40 min after ketamine infusion. Multiple regression analysis showed that no factors were correlated significantly with the percentage change in the HAM-D-6 total score three days after ketamine administration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Later disease onset correlates with a better treatment response three days after ketamine infusion in patients with TRD. Glutamatergic signal transmission may be impaired in patients with an earlier onset of depression, resulting in decreased neuroplasticity, which diminishes ketamine response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41237454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-08-29DOI: 10.1055/a-2142-9325
Scott Monteith, Tasha Glenn, John R Geddes, Eric D Achtyes, Peter C Whybrow, Michael Bauer
Abstract This narrative review discusses how the safe and effective use of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) prediction tools requires recognition of the importance of human intelligence. Human intelligence, creativity, situational awareness, and professional knowledge, are required for successful implementation. The implementation of clinical AI prediction tools may change the workflow in medical practice resulting in new challenges and safety implications. Human understanding of how a clinical AI prediction tool performs in routine and exceptional situations is fundamental to successful implementation. Physicians must be involved in all aspects of the selection, implementation, and ongoing product monitoring of clinical AI prediction tools.
{"title":"Challenges and Ethical Considerations to Successfully Implement Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Medicine and Neuroscience: a Narrative Review.","authors":"Scott Monteith, Tasha Glenn, John R Geddes, Eric D Achtyes, Peter C Whybrow, Michael Bauer","doi":"10.1055/a-2142-9325","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2142-9325","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This narrative review discusses how the safe and effective use of clinical artificial intelligence (AI) prediction tools requires recognition of the importance of human intelligence. Human intelligence, creativity, situational awareness, and professional knowledge, are required for successful implementation. The implementation of clinical AI prediction tools may change the workflow in medical practice resulting in new challenges and safety implications. Human understanding of how a clinical AI prediction tool performs in routine and exceptional situations is fundamental to successful implementation. Physicians must be involved in all aspects of the selection, implementation, and ongoing product monitoring of clinical AI prediction tools.","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"209-213"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10115210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-09-12DOI: 10.1055/a-2154-0828
Isabella Berardelli, Elena Rogante, Salvatore Sarubbi, Maria Anna Trocchia, Ludovica Longhini, Denise Erbuto, Marco Innamorati, Maurizio Pompili
Introduction: Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide and models may help the understanding of the phenomenon and ultimately reduce its burden through effective suicide prevention strategies. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide and Shneidman's Model have tried to describe different unmet needs related to suicidal ideation. The study aims to assess the association between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and suicidal ideation in a sample of psychiatric inpatients and the mediating role of hopelessness and mental pain in this association.
Methods: 112 consecutive adult psychiatric inpatients were administered the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), the Italian version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15-I (INQ-15-I), the Physical and Psychological Pain Scale, and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS).
Results: Mediation models indicated a significant indirect effect of perceived burdensomeness (with thwarted belongingness as covariates) on suicidal ideation intensity with hopelessness as a mediator. When thwarted belongingness (controlling for perceived burdensomeness as a covariate) was included in a model as an independent variable, direct and indirect effects on suicidal ideation intensity were not significant.
Conclusions: Psychosocial interventions focusing on identifying and decreasing the perception of being a burden for others and the feeling hopeless could represent a powerful pathway for reducing suicidal ideation. Moreover, the attention toward unmet interpersonal needs may help increase and focus clinical discussions on risk factors, which may help engagement toward psychiatric care and downsize the stigma related to suicide. Raising awareness toward mental health topics is a goal of healthcare services globally.
引言:自杀是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,模型可以帮助理解这一现象,并最终通过有效的自杀预防策略减轻其负担。自杀的人际关系理论和施奈德曼模型试图描述与自杀意念有关的不同的未满足需求。本研究旨在评估精神科住院病人受挫的归属感、感知负担和自杀意念之间的关系,以及绝望和精神痛苦在这种关系中的中介作用。方法:采用哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表(C-SSRS)、意大利版人际需求问卷-15- i (INQ-15-I)、身心疼痛量表和贝克绝望量表(BHS)对112例连续住院成人精神病患者进行问卷调查。结果:中介模型表明,感知负担(以受挫的归属感为协变量)对自杀意念强度有显著的间接影响,而绝望是一个中介。当被挫败的归属感(控制感知负担作为协变量)作为自变量纳入模型时,对自杀意念强度的直接和间接影响不显著。结论:社会心理干预的重点是识别和减少对他人的负担感和绝望感,这可能是减少自杀意念的有力途径。此外,对未满足的人际需求的关注可能有助于增加和集中临床讨论的风险因素,这可能有助于参与精神病学护理和减少与自杀有关的耻辱感。提高对心理健康问题的认识是全球卫生保健服务的一个目标。
{"title":"Interpersonal Needs, Mental Pain, and Hopelessness in Psychiatric Inpatients with Suicidal Ideation.","authors":"Isabella Berardelli, Elena Rogante, Salvatore Sarubbi, Maria Anna Trocchia, Ludovica Longhini, Denise Erbuto, Marco Innamorati, Maurizio Pompili","doi":"10.1055/a-2154-0828","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2154-0828","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide and models may help the understanding of the phenomenon and ultimately reduce its burden through effective suicide prevention strategies. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide and Shneidman's Model have tried to describe different unmet needs related to suicidal ideation. The study aims to assess the association between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and suicidal ideation in a sample of psychiatric inpatients and the mediating role of hopelessness and mental pain in this association.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>112 consecutive adult psychiatric inpatients were administered the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), the Italian version of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire-15-I (INQ-15-I), the Physical and Psychological Pain Scale, and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mediation models indicated a significant indirect effect of perceived burdensomeness (with thwarted belongingness as covariates) on suicidal ideation intensity with hopelessness as a mediator. When thwarted belongingness (controlling for perceived burdensomeness as a covariate) was included in a model as an independent variable, direct and indirect effects on suicidal ideation intensity were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychosocial interventions focusing on identifying and decreasing the perception of being a burden for others and the feeling hopeless could represent a powerful pathway for reducing suicidal ideation. Moreover, the attention toward unmet interpersonal needs may help increase and focus clinical discussions on risk factors, which may help engagement toward psychiatric care and downsize the stigma related to suicide. Raising awareness toward mental health topics is a goal of healthcare services globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"219-226"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10226759","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-11-09DOI: 10.1055/a-2177-3056
Juliane K Mueller, Kira F Ahrens, Michael Bauer, Bernhard T Baune, Stefan Borgwardt, Jürgen Deckert, Katharina Domschke, Regina Ellwanger, Andreas Fallgatter, Thomas Frodl, Jürgen Gallinat, René Gottschalk, Hans J Grabe, Alkomiet Hasan, Sabine C Herpertz, Rene Hurlemann, Frank Jessen, Joseph Kambeitz, Tilo Kircher, Johannes Kornhuber, Klaus Lieb, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Rainer Rupprecht, Norbert Scherbaum, Christiane Schlang, Anja Schneider, Georg Schomerus, Andreas Thoma, Stefan Unterecker, Martin Walter, Henrik Walter, Andreas Reif, Christine Reif-Leonhard
Introduction: In patients with a pre-existing mental disorder, an increased risk for a first manifestation of a psychiatric disorder in COVID-19 patients, a more severe course of COVID-19 and an increased mortality have been described. Conversely, observations of lower COVID-19 incidences in psychiatric in-patients suggested protective effects of psychiatric treatment and/or psychotropic drugs against COVID-19.
Methods: A retrospective multi-center study was conducted in 24 German psychiatric university hospitals. Between April and December 2020 (the first and partly second wave of COVID-19), the effects of COVID-19 were assessed on psychiatric in-patient care, the incidence and course of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and treatment with psychotropic drugs.
Results: Patients (n=36,322) were admitted to the hospitals. Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 tests before/during admission were reported by 23 hospitals (95.8%), while 18 (75%) conducted regular testing during the hospital stay. Two hundred thirty-two (0.6%) patients were tested SARS-CoV-2-positive. Thirty-seven (16%) patients were receiving medical treatment for COVID-19 at the psychiatric hospital, ten (4.3%) were transferred to an intermediate/intensive care unit, and three (1.3%) died. The most common prescription for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was for second-generation antipsychotics (n=79, 28.2%) and antidepressants (SSRIs (n=38, 13.5%), mirtazapine (n=36, 12.9%) and SNRIs (n=29, 10.4%)).
Discussion: Contrary to previous studies, our results showed a low number of infections and mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive psychiatric patients. Several preventive measures seem effective to protect this vulnerable group. Our observations are compatible with the hypothesis of a protective effect of psychotropic drugs against COVID-19 as the overall mortality and need for specific medical treatment was low.
{"title":"Prevalence of COVID-19 and Psychotropic Drug Treatment in Psychiatric In-patients in Germany in 2020: Results from a Nationwide Pilot Survey.","authors":"Juliane K Mueller, Kira F Ahrens, Michael Bauer, Bernhard T Baune, Stefan Borgwardt, Jürgen Deckert, Katharina Domschke, Regina Ellwanger, Andreas Fallgatter, Thomas Frodl, Jürgen Gallinat, René Gottschalk, Hans J Grabe, Alkomiet Hasan, Sabine C Herpertz, Rene Hurlemann, Frank Jessen, Joseph Kambeitz, Tilo Kircher, Johannes Kornhuber, Klaus Lieb, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, Rainer Rupprecht, Norbert Scherbaum, Christiane Schlang, Anja Schneider, Georg Schomerus, Andreas Thoma, Stefan Unterecker, Martin Walter, Henrik Walter, Andreas Reif, Christine Reif-Leonhard","doi":"10.1055/a-2177-3056","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2177-3056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In patients with a pre-existing mental disorder, an increased risk for a first manifestation of a psychiatric disorder in COVID-19 patients, a more severe course of COVID-19 and an increased mortality have been described. Conversely, observations of lower COVID-19 incidences in psychiatric in-patients suggested protective effects of psychiatric treatment and/or psychotropic drugs against COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multi-center study was conducted in 24 German psychiatric university hospitals. Between April and December 2020 (the first and partly second wave of COVID-19), the effects of COVID-19 were assessed on psychiatric in-patient care, the incidence and course of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and treatment with psychotropic drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (n=36,322) were admitted to the hospitals. Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 tests before/during admission were reported by 23 hospitals (95.8%), while 18 (75%) conducted regular testing during the hospital stay. Two hundred thirty-two (0.6%) patients were tested SARS-CoV-2-positive. Thirty-seven (16%) patients were receiving medical treatment for COVID-19 at the psychiatric hospital, ten (4.3%) were transferred to an intermediate/intensive care unit, and three (1.3%) died. The most common prescription for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was for second-generation antipsychotics (n=79, 28.2%) and antidepressants (SSRIs (n=38, 13.5%), mirtazapine (n=36, 12.9%) and SNRIs (n=29, 10.4%)).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Contrary to previous studies, our results showed a low number of infections and mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive psychiatric patients. Several preventive measures seem effective to protect this vulnerable group. Our observations are compatible with the hypothesis of a protective effect of psychotropic drugs against COVID-19 as the overall mortality and need for specific medical treatment was low.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":"56 6","pages":"227-238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72015031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-10-26DOI: 10.1055/a-2152-7757
Garrett D Alexander, Luke R Cavanah, Jessica L Goldhirsh, Leighton Y Huey, Brian J Piper
Introduction: There has been a pronounced increase in the use of Schedule II stimulants to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United States over the last two decades. Interestingly, chronic medical cannabis (MC) use can present with cognitive impairments that resemble ADHD symptoms. This study aimed to determine if MC legalization increased prescription stimulant distribution.
Methods: Information on the distribution of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine for 2006 to 2021 was extracted from the Drug Enforcement Administration's comprehensive database and the three-year population-corrected slopes of stimulant distribution before and after MC program implementation were compared.
Results: We found a significant main effect of time (p<0.001); however, contrary to the hypothesis, the sales status of states' MC, did not influence slopes of distribution (p=0.391). There was a significantly large interaction effect of time and MC sales status on slopes of distribution (p<0.001). Slopes of distribution rates of stimulants were significantly lower in states that proceeded to legalize MC prior to MC program implementation than those states that did not (p=0.022). After MC program implementation, however, the distribution rates of the Schedule II stimulants were not significantly different when comparing states with MC sales to those without (p=0.355).
Discussion: These findings suggest that MC program legalization did not contribute to certain states having rapid increases in Schedule II stimulant distribution rates over time. Other factors, including the liberalization of the adult ADHD diagnostic criteria in the DSM-5 and the introduction of Binge Eating Disorder, also likely contributed to elevations in stimulant distribution.
{"title":"Medical Cannabis Legalization: No Contribution to Rising Stimulant Rates in the USA.","authors":"Garrett D Alexander, Luke R Cavanah, Jessica L Goldhirsh, Leighton Y Huey, Brian J Piper","doi":"10.1055/a-2152-7757","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2152-7757","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There has been a pronounced increase in the use of Schedule II stimulants to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the United States over the last two decades. Interestingly, chronic medical cannabis (MC) use can present with cognitive impairments that resemble ADHD symptoms. This study aimed to determine if MC legalization increased prescription stimulant distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information on the distribution of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and lisdexamfetamine for 2006 to 2021 was extracted from the Drug Enforcement Administration's comprehensive database and the three-year population-corrected slopes of stimulant distribution before and after MC program implementation were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found a significant main effect of time (<i>p</i><0.001); however, contrary to the hypothesis, the sales status of states' MC, did not influence slopes of distribution (<i>p</i>=0.391). There was a significantly large interaction effect of time and MC sales status on slopes of distribution (<i>p</i><0.001). Slopes of distribution rates of stimulants were significantly lower in states that proceeded to legalize MC prior to MC program implementation than those states that did not (<i>p</i>=0.022). After MC program implementation, however, the distribution rates of the Schedule II stimulants were not significantly different when comparing states with MC sales to those without (<i>p</i>=0.355).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that MC program legalization did not contribute to certain states having rapid increases in Schedule II stimulant distribution rates over time. Other factors, including the liberalization of the adult ADHD diagnostic criteria in the DSM-5 and the introduction of Binge Eating Disorder, also likely contributed to elevations in stimulant distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":19783,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"214-218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"54230500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}