Abstract This opinion paper describes the discussions of the attendees of the last GERPAC European conference workshop on the question of chemical stability and container-content interactions. Pharmacists discussed the steps to implement to carry out those studies that are particulary important to asses the quality of the compounded preparations in hospital pharmacies.
{"title":"Methods for the Study of Physical and Chemical Stability and Container-Content Interactions: Report of a GERPAC Workshop","authors":"V. Sautou, F. Lagarce","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2019-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2019-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This opinion paper describes the discussions of the attendees of the last GERPAC European conference workshop on the question of chemical stability and container-content interactions. Pharmacists discussed the steps to implement to carry out those studies that are particulary important to asses the quality of the compounded preparations in hospital pharmacies.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"32 1","pages":"95 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73789005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucie Painchart, Marie Palamini, P. Odou, J. Bussières
Abstract Background The preparation of many drugs intended for parenteral administration is centralized in the pharmacy of healthcare institutions. However, no data are available describing the range of drugs with centralized preparation. The objective was to establish a profile of centralization practices for the preparation of non-hazardous drug doses in the pharmacy departments of Quebec healthcare institutions. Methods For this cross-sectional descriptive study, an e-mail survey was distributed in March 2017 to the directors of the pharmacy departments of Quebec healthcare institutions. Respondents were asked to estimate the percentage of parenteral drug doses that were prepared centrally in the pharmacy, the name of each drug prepared this way, the criteria used to select drugs for central preparation, and the barriers to centralizing preparation of drug doses. Only descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results Of the 30 directors of pharmacy departments invited to participate, 27 (90 %) responded, representing a total of 40 Quebec healthcare facilities. Overall, 232 individual drugs were centrally prepared in one or more of these facilities, for an overall median of 22 drugs per facility (min: 1, max: 101). Conclusions This is the first survey in Quebec and indeed all of Canada to identify the many medications that are centrally prepared in hospital pharmacies. The survey showed that the selection of drugs for central preparation differed widely across facilities. It would be desirable for pharmacy departments in this province to collaborate on standardizing practices for central preparations.
{"title":"Profile of Centralization Practices for Preparation of Non-Hazardous Drugs in Quebec Hospitals","authors":"Lucie Painchart, Marie Palamini, P. Odou, J. Bussières","doi":"10.1515/pthp-2019-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2019-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The preparation of many drugs intended for parenteral administration is centralized in the pharmacy of healthcare institutions. However, no data are available describing the range of drugs with centralized preparation. The objective was to establish a profile of centralization practices for the preparation of non-hazardous drug doses in the pharmacy departments of Quebec healthcare institutions. Methods For this cross-sectional descriptive study, an e-mail survey was distributed in March 2017 to the directors of the pharmacy departments of Quebec healthcare institutions. Respondents were asked to estimate the percentage of parenteral drug doses that were prepared centrally in the pharmacy, the name of each drug prepared this way, the criteria used to select drugs for central preparation, and the barriers to centralizing preparation of drug doses. Only descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results Of the 30 directors of pharmacy departments invited to participate, 27 (90 %) responded, representing a total of 40 Quebec healthcare facilities. Overall, 232 individual drugs were centrally prepared in one or more of these facilities, for an overall median of 22 drugs per facility (min: 1, max: 101). Conclusions This is the first survey in Quebec and indeed all of Canada to identify the many medications that are centrally prepared in hospital pharmacies. The survey showed that the selection of drugs for central preparation differed widely across facilities. It would be desirable for pharmacy departments in this province to collaborate on standardizing practices for central preparations.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"83 1","pages":"89 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80628446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
E. D’huart, J. Vigneron, F. Blaise, A. Charmillon, B. Demoré
Abstract Background Cefotaxime sodium is an antibiotic used to treat severe infections such as in intensive care units (ICUs). The recommended dose of cefotaxime sodium can vary from 3 grams (g) to 24 g per day and publications have demonstrated that continuous administration of cefotaxime sodium is the preferred mode of administration. In ICUs, a minimum volume is used for patients requiring fluid restriction, leading to high concentrations of cefotaxime sodium. The objective was to study the stability of cefotaxime sodium solutions at 83.3 mg/mL and 125 mg/mL, diluted in 0.9 % sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl) or in 5 % glucose (G5 %), stored in polypropylene syringes, after the preparation and after a 6-hour and a 12-hour storage at 20–25 °C. Methods Three syringes for each condition were prepared. At each time of the analysis, three samples for each syringe were prepared and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to a photodiode array detector. The method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Q2(R1). Physical stability was evaluated by visual and subvisual inspection (turbidimetry by UV spectrophotometry at 350, 410 and 550 nm as recommended by the European Consensus Conference). pH and osmolality values were measured at each time of the analysis. Results For each solvent, cefotaxime sodium solutions at 83.3 mg/mL and 125 mg/mL retained more than 90 % of the initial concentration after 12 hours. During the stability study, pH values decreased slightly, the intensity of the yellow colour increased and values of absorbance increased progressively for each wavelength and each condition. An additional peak with a relative retention of 3.01 was also observed after the forced degradation gradually increased up to 4.01 % and 3.17 % of the total of surface area of the peaks present on the chromatogram after 12 hours in 0.9 % NaCl and in G5 % respectively. Conclusions In view of the results and despite the fact that solutions retained more than 90 % of the initial concentration after HPLC analysis, we propose to limit the stability of cefotaxime sodium in 0.9 % NaCl and G5 % at 83.3 and 125 mg/mL at 6 hours. These stability data of highly concentrated solutions provide an additional knowledge to assist ICUs in daily practice. This work also demonstrates that highly concentrated cefotaxime sodium solutions are physically unstable after a 6-hour storage and cannot be administered as a daily infusion.
{"title":"Physicochemical Stability of Cefotaxime Sodium in Polypropylene Syringes at High Concentrations for Intensive Care Units","authors":"E. D’huart, J. Vigneron, F. Blaise, A. Charmillon, B. Demoré","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2019-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2019-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Cefotaxime sodium is an antibiotic used to treat severe infections such as in intensive care units (ICUs). The recommended dose of cefotaxime sodium can vary from 3 grams (g) to 24 g per day and publications have demonstrated that continuous administration of cefotaxime sodium is the preferred mode of administration. In ICUs, a minimum volume is used for patients requiring fluid restriction, leading to high concentrations of cefotaxime sodium. The objective was to study the stability of cefotaxime sodium solutions at 83.3 mg/mL and 125 mg/mL, diluted in 0.9 % sodium chloride (0.9 % NaCl) or in 5 % glucose (G5 %), stored in polypropylene syringes, after the preparation and after a 6-hour and a 12-hour storage at 20–25 °C. Methods Three syringes for each condition were prepared. At each time of the analysis, three samples for each syringe were prepared and analysed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to a photodiode array detector. The method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonisation Q2(R1). Physical stability was evaluated by visual and subvisual inspection (turbidimetry by UV spectrophotometry at 350, 410 and 550 nm as recommended by the European Consensus Conference). pH and osmolality values were measured at each time of the analysis. Results For each solvent, cefotaxime sodium solutions at 83.3 mg/mL and 125 mg/mL retained more than 90 % of the initial concentration after 12 hours. During the stability study, pH values decreased slightly, the intensity of the yellow colour increased and values of absorbance increased progressively for each wavelength and each condition. An additional peak with a relative retention of 3.01 was also observed after the forced degradation gradually increased up to 4.01 % and 3.17 % of the total of surface area of the peaks present on the chromatogram after 12 hours in 0.9 % NaCl and in G5 % respectively. Conclusions In view of the results and despite the fact that solutions retained more than 90 % of the initial concentration after HPLC analysis, we propose to limit the stability of cefotaxime sodium in 0.9 % NaCl and G5 % at 83.3 and 125 mg/mL at 6 hours. These stability data of highly concentrated solutions provide an additional knowledge to assist ICUs in daily practice. This work also demonstrates that highly concentrated cefotaxime sodium solutions are physically unstable after a 6-hour storage and cannot be administered as a daily infusion.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"52 1","pages":"59 - 67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74382515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Background The objectives were to perform an observation of the administration of injectable drugs in three ICUs, to identify injectable drugs administered by Y-site infusion or mixed in the same container, to compare with physical compatibility data available in the literature and to test the physical compatibility for missing data. Methods An observational study was realised over two weeks and patients receiving more than one injectable drug in the same line simultaneously were included. Physical compatibilities were assessed in pairs by comparing with three databases. For some missing data, three tests were realised for pairs including an anti-infective drug. Visual and subvisual evaluations were performed after the preparation, 1 and a 4-hour storage. Results A total of 389 combinations between two injectable drugs was observed for Y-site infusions and 31 mixtures in the same container. According to the literature, 21.1 % associations were physically compatible, 1.8 % as physically compatible potentially, 8.0 % as physically incompatible, 6.4 % have divergent data according to the databases and 62.7 % have no data. Two mixtures were documented. 37 pairs were tested and 70.3 % were physically compatible, 8.1 % were physically incompatible after visual evaluation and 21.6 % after subvisual evaluation. Conclusions In the majority of cases, no compatibility data are available in the literature. Laboratory tests give additional information.
{"title":"Physical Compatibility of Intravenous Drugs Commonly Used in Intensive Care Units: An Observational Study and Physical Compatibility Laboratory Tests on Anti-Infective Drugs","authors":"E. D’huart, J. Vigneron, B. Demoré","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2019-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2019-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The objectives were to perform an observation of the administration of injectable drugs in three ICUs, to identify injectable drugs administered by Y-site infusion or mixed in the same container, to compare with physical compatibility data available in the literature and to test the physical compatibility for missing data. Methods An observational study was realised over two weeks and patients receiving more than one injectable drug in the same line simultaneously were included. Physical compatibilities were assessed in pairs by comparing with three databases. For some missing data, three tests were realised for pairs including an anti-infective drug. Visual and subvisual evaluations were performed after the preparation, 1 and a 4-hour storage. Results A total of 389 combinations between two injectable drugs was observed for Y-site infusions and 31 mixtures in the same container. According to the literature, 21.1 % associations were physically compatible, 1.8 % as physically compatible potentially, 8.0 % as physically incompatible, 6.4 % have divergent data according to the databases and 62.7 % have no data. Two mixtures were documented. 37 pairs were tested and 70.3 % were physically compatible, 8.1 % were physically incompatible after visual evaluation and 21.6 % after subvisual evaluation. Conclusions In the majority of cases, no compatibility data are available in the literature. Laboratory tests give additional information.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"62 1","pages":"29 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86012878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Importance of a Scientific Journal in the Field of Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospitals","authors":"F. Lagarce","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2019-2010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2019-2010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73214001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jeanne Heloury, Guillaume Bouguéon, T. Deljehier, A. Jourand, A. Berroneau, S. Crauste-Manciet
Abstract Two automation methods for aseptic preparation in hospital pharmacy, robot and peristaltic pump, were compared to manual process both for risk analysis using Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method and for productivity using time analysis grids built for each process. The results obtained with the different workflow organizations showed that the worst-case conditions for productivity was production “on demand” of tailor-made preparations. in that case, the manual process was not significantly different from the robotic process (p-value=0.72). For the standardized preparations, the semi-automatic process preparing a batch from bulk solution from “to be reconstituted” drugs was significantly superior to the robotic process preparing repetitive series of doses (p-value<0.01). Productivity of the robot was dramatically increased when the robot performed standardized preparations either from ready to use solutions or mixed cycles due to the robot design. When different processes were FMECA analyzed for risk analysis the robotic process was found as the safer process in comparison to others with a total of Criticality Indexes of 1060, 719, 656 for manual, semi-automatic and robot, respectively. Except for the robotic, semi-automatic and manual processes needed additional IT control systems to limit the risk of failures.
{"title":"Automation of Aseptic Sterile Preparation: Risk Analysis and Productivity Comparison with Manual Process","authors":"Jeanne Heloury, Guillaume Bouguéon, T. Deljehier, A. Jourand, A. Berroneau, S. Crauste-Manciet","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2019-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2019-0001","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two automation methods for aseptic preparation in hospital pharmacy, robot and peristaltic pump, were compared to manual process both for risk analysis using Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method and for productivity using time analysis grids built for each process. The results obtained with the different workflow organizations showed that the worst-case conditions for productivity was production “on demand” of tailor-made preparations. in that case, the manual process was not significantly different from the robotic process (p-value=0.72). For the standardized preparations, the semi-automatic process preparing a batch from bulk solution from “to be reconstituted” drugs was significantly superior to the robotic process preparing repetitive series of doses (p-value<0.01). Productivity of the robot was dramatically increased when the robot performed standardized preparations either from ready to use solutions or mixed cycles due to the robot design. When different processes were FMECA analyzed for risk analysis the robotic process was found as the safer process in comparison to others with a total of Criticality Indexes of 1060, 719, 656 for manual, semi-automatic and robot, respectively. Except for the robotic, semi-automatic and manual processes needed additional IT control systems to limit the risk of failures.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"10 1","pages":"15 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88595984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marie Hamon, F. Capelle, R. Passemard, B. Gourieux
Abstract Background Automated unit-dose dispensing system (ADS) of oral solid medication is a complex and sensitive production process in the drug distribution system. Hence, an appropriate training of hospital pharmacy technicians (HPT) is essential. A basic training (observational and practical) of 3 weeks is first organized to evaluate the HPT, followed by an interview with both the pharmacist and the HPT chief. The importance of the human factor (daily routine and repetitive tasks) showed by the risks analysis within this process has led us to search new learning methods to keep the team engaged. An e-learning training was selected in order to further complete the HPT initial training but also as a continuous training to the HPTs who are already working in the ADS process. Process and Methods The e-learning tool was developed using the Google® platform and includes four theoretical training modules (Google® Slides): Module 1 “General organization”, Module 2 “Automatic preparation machine”, Module 3 “Repackaging” and Module 4 “Non-automated drug dispensing”. Each module ends with a self-assessment (Google® Forms). Various teaching materials are included: links to institutional procedures, videos, photos, quizzes, simulations … A minimum of 75 % of correct answers is requested to validate each module. The e-learning, once final, was validated with a new HPT and with five HPTs already in place for more than a year. A satisfaction form is available at the end of the training. Results The 6 HPTs obtained an average of 17.75/20 correct answers. The most successful modules were 1 and 4 (average per module: M1 = 18.5/20; M2=16.8/20; M3=17/20; M4=18.7/20). For module 3, two HPTs scored below 75 % and therefore had to pass this module again. The average time to complete this training was 1.5 hours. HPTs are 100 % satisfied with the training and the teaching materials used. Discussion/Conclusions The e-learning tool fit well with the initial training and the continuous training of the HPTs. Its set up is simple. The duration length spent on the training is shortened for both the pharmacist and the learner. This tool is tailored to the learner needs and constraints. It allows the integration of playful and interactive teaching tool which were appreciated. An audit will be conducted to assess the impact of this training tool on the overall ADS process.
{"title":"Assessment of an Online Training Tool for the Automated Unit-Dose Dispensing System (ADS) Process","authors":"Marie Hamon, F. Capelle, R. Passemard, B. Gourieux","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2019-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2019-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Automated unit-dose dispensing system (ADS) of oral solid medication is a complex and sensitive production process in the drug distribution system. Hence, an appropriate training of hospital pharmacy technicians (HPT) is essential. A basic training (observational and practical) of 3 weeks is first organized to evaluate the HPT, followed by an interview with both the pharmacist and the HPT chief. The importance of the human factor (daily routine and repetitive tasks) showed by the risks analysis within this process has led us to search new learning methods to keep the team engaged. An e-learning training was selected in order to further complete the HPT initial training but also as a continuous training to the HPTs who are already working in the ADS process. Process and Methods The e-learning tool was developed using the Google® platform and includes four theoretical training modules (Google® Slides): Module 1 “General organization”, Module 2 “Automatic preparation machine”, Module 3 “Repackaging” and Module 4 “Non-automated drug dispensing”. Each module ends with a self-assessment (Google® Forms). Various teaching materials are included: links to institutional procedures, videos, photos, quizzes, simulations … A minimum of 75 % of correct answers is requested to validate each module. The e-learning, once final, was validated with a new HPT and with five HPTs already in place for more than a year. A satisfaction form is available at the end of the training. Results The 6 HPTs obtained an average of 17.75/20 correct answers. The most successful modules were 1 and 4 (average per module: M1 = 18.5/20; M2=16.8/20; M3=17/20; M4=18.7/20). For module 3, two HPTs scored below 75 % and therefore had to pass this module again. The average time to complete this training was 1.5 hours. HPTs are 100 % satisfied with the training and the teaching materials used. Discussion/Conclusions The e-learning tool fit well with the initial training and the continuous training of the HPTs. Its set up is simple. The duration length spent on the training is shortened for both the pharmacist and the learner. This tool is tailored to the learner needs and constraints. It allows the integration of playful and interactive teaching tool which were appreciated. An audit will be conducted to assess the impact of this training tool on the overall ADS process.","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"76 1","pages":"41 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74502741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Bonnet, M. Dermu, Clara Roessle, M. Bellaiche, T. Abarou, V. Vasseur, Samira Benakouche, T. Storme
Corrigendum to: Mathilde Bonnet, Marine Dermu, Clara Roessle, Marc Bellaiche, Tarik Abarou, Véronique Vasseur, Samira Benakouche and Thomas Storme. Formulation of a 3-months Stability Oral Viscous Budesonide Gel and Development of an Indicating Stability HPLC Method. Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy. Volume 3, Issue 2, pages 91–99. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp2018-0005) In Table 1, on page 94, the formulation was based on the original formula published by Eyal Zur, compounding pharmacist and consultant from Israel, in the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Coupounding in 2012. [1]
更正:Mathilde Bonnet, Marine Dermu, Clara Roessle, Marc Bellaiche, Tarik Abarou, v尼克·瓦瑟尔,Samira Benakouche和Thomas Storme。3个月稳定口服粘性布地奈德凝胶的制备及指示稳定性高效液相色谱法的建立。医院药房的制药技术第三卷,第2期,第91-99页。(DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp2018-0005)在第94页的表1中,该配方基于以色列复方药剂师和顾问Eyal Zur于2012年在《国际药物配药杂志》上发表的原始配方。[1]
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Formulation of a 3-months Stability Oral Viscous Budesonide Gel and Development of an Indicating Stability HPLC Method","authors":"M. Bonnet, M. Dermu, Clara Roessle, M. Bellaiche, T. Abarou, V. Vasseur, Samira Benakouche, T. Storme","doi":"10.1515/PTHP-2018-9005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/PTHP-2018-9005","url":null,"abstract":"Corrigendum to: Mathilde Bonnet, Marine Dermu, Clara Roessle, Marc Bellaiche, Tarik Abarou, Véronique Vasseur, Samira Benakouche and Thomas Storme. Formulation of a 3-months Stability Oral Viscous Budesonide Gel and Development of an Indicating Stability HPLC Method. Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy. Volume 3, Issue 2, pages 91–99. (DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp2018-0005) In Table 1, on page 94, the formulation was based on the original formula published by Eyal Zur, compounding pharmacist and consultant from Israel, in the International Journal of Pharmaceutical Coupounding in 2012. [1]","PeriodicalId":19802,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"47 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83080546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}