Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-07DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00796-6
Dan Wu, Bo Peng, Yingjie Hua, Wujun Geng, Bing Huang, Siyu Lu, Junlin Chen, Keyi He, Yuxi Wang, Qiaoyin Rao, Zubo Jiang, Chuanguang Wang, Yakang Dai, Jiansong Ji, Zhongwei Zhao
Introduction: This study integrated structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) of the brain with clinical characteristics to identify the "vulnerable brain regions" and risk factors associated with the development of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in patients with acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia. Furthermore, the study explored the combined predictive performance of these neuroimaging and clinical indicators.
Methods: From February 2023 to January 2025, a total of 214 hospitalized patients with acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia were enrolled. Follow-up was conducted via telephone or outpatient visits, revealing that 116 patients (54.98%) developed PHN, while 95 did not. Clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected for all participants. T1-weighted structural MRI images underwent preprocessing procedures including N4 bias field correction, skull stripping, brain tissue segmentation, and parcellation. Gray matter volume (GMV) values were extracted from 90 predefined regions of interest (ROIs) for further analysis. Group differences were assessed using two-tailed Student's t-tests or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test, as appropriate. Features showing significant intergroup differences in GMV were integrated with clinical variables to train machine learning models, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate their predictive performance for PHN.
Results: Significant differences were observed between the PHN and Non-PHN groups in several clinical variables, including age, body mass index (BMI), age ≥ 50 years, disease duration, admission Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, hospitalization during the acute phase (< 1 month), involved dermatome, and total Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (all P < 0.05). In terms of neuroimaging findings, GMV differed significantly between the two groups in the following brain regions: the left inferior frontal gyrus (triangular part), fusiform gyrus, Heschl's gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus; the right orbital part of the inferior frontal gyrus, lentiform nucleus (globus pallidus); and the bilateral cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, and caudate nucleus (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate [FDR] method). The combined model integrating T1-weighted MRI features and clinical characteristics achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.748 (95% CI 0.677-0.816) for predicting the occurrence of PHN.
Conclusion: This study is the first to innovatively integrate sMRI to identify "vulnerable brain regions" associated with the transition from acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia to PHN. By combining GMV metrics with clinical features, the study provides a novel approach for predicting the development of PHN.
{"title":"Prediction of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients with Acute and Subacute Herpetic Neuralgia Using Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Dan Wu, Bo Peng, Yingjie Hua, Wujun Geng, Bing Huang, Siyu Lu, Junlin Chen, Keyi He, Yuxi Wang, Qiaoyin Rao, Zubo Jiang, Chuanguang Wang, Yakang Dai, Jiansong Ji, Zhongwei Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00796-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00796-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study integrated structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) of the brain with clinical characteristics to identify the \"vulnerable brain regions\" and risk factors associated with the development of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) in patients with acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia. Furthermore, the study explored the combined predictive performance of these neuroimaging and clinical indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 2023 to January 2025, a total of 214 hospitalized patients with acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia were enrolled. Follow-up was conducted via telephone or outpatient visits, revealing that 116 patients (54.98%) developed PHN, while 95 did not. Clinical data and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected for all participants. T1-weighted structural MRI images underwent preprocessing procedures including N4 bias field correction, skull stripping, brain tissue segmentation, and parcellation. Gray matter volume (GMV) values were extracted from 90 predefined regions of interest (ROIs) for further analysis. Group differences were assessed using two-tailed Student's t-tests or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis H test, as appropriate. Features showing significant intergroup differences in GMV were integrated with clinical variables to train machine learning models, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate their predictive performance for PHN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed between the PHN and Non-PHN groups in several clinical variables, including age, body mass index (BMI), age ≥ 50 years, disease duration, admission Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score, hospitalization during the acute phase (< 1 month), involved dermatome, and total Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (all P < 0.05). In terms of neuroimaging findings, GMV differed significantly between the two groups in the following brain regions: the left inferior frontal gyrus (triangular part), fusiform gyrus, Heschl's gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus; the right orbital part of the inferior frontal gyrus, lentiform nucleus (globus pallidus); and the bilateral cingulate gyrus, hippocampus, and caudate nucleus (P < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate [FDR] method). The combined model integrating T1-weighted MRI features and clinical characteristics achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.748 (95% CI 0.677-0.816) for predicting the occurrence of PHN.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first to innovatively integrate sMRI to identify \"vulnerable brain regions\" associated with the transition from acute and subacute herpetic neuralgia to PHN. By combining GMV metrics with clinical features, the study provides a novel approach for predicting the development of PHN.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"269-289"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-16DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00805-8
Ahmed Attar, Yasser Aladdin, Alqassem Hakami, Abdalmajed Alqsair, Sulaiman Baeisa, Ahmed Alzahrani, Ahmed Alsimsimi, Sarah Alzebaidi
Introduction: Randomized controlled trials have established onabotulinumtoxinA as an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. However, real-world evidence in the Saudi population remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with chronic migraine treated at a tertiary care center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between 2016 and 2024.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) was used. Data on patients' demographics, number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses (155 U for each dose), pain level, days of headache in the 3 months following the last injection, and side effects experienced after each injection session were gathered.
Results: Among 133 patients studied, 85% were female, 56.4% were aged ≤ 40 years, and 66.9% had ≤ 14 headache days in the 3 months following the last injection. The median MIDAS score decreased from 28 (severe disability) to 8 (mild disability). Median headache days were reduced from 60 to 10 days. Patients with MIDAS Grade I had a significant higher number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses. A significant negative correlation was found between number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses and the MIDAS grade, pain level, and days of headache in the 3 months post injection. Side effects were experienced by 13.5% of patients, with ptosis being the most common.
Conclusion: OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in meaningful reductions in migraine-related disability, headache frequency, and pain intensity in patients with chronic migraine treated in a tertiary care center. These findings reinforce its role as an effective long-term preventive therapy and highlight the importance of maintaining consistent treatment cycles to sustain clinical benefit.
{"title":"Real-World Data on the Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections as Prophylactic Treatment for Migraine: A Retrospective Study from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (2016-2024).","authors":"Ahmed Attar, Yasser Aladdin, Alqassem Hakami, Abdalmajed Alqsair, Sulaiman Baeisa, Ahmed Alzahrani, Ahmed Alsimsimi, Sarah Alzebaidi","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00805-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00805-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Randomized controlled trials have established onabotulinumtoxinA as an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic migraine. However, real-world evidence in the Saudi population remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with chronic migraine treated at a tertiary care center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia between 2016 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) was used. Data on patients' demographics, number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses (155 U for each dose), pain level, days of headache in the 3 months following the last injection, and side effects experienced after each injection session were gathered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 133 patients studied, 85% were female, 56.4% were aged ≤ 40 years, and 66.9% had ≤ 14 headache days in the 3 months following the last injection. The median MIDAS score decreased from 28 (severe disability) to 8 (mild disability). Median headache days were reduced from 60 to 10 days. Patients with MIDAS Grade I had a significant higher number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses. A significant negative correlation was found between number of onabotulinumtoxinA doses and the MIDAS grade, pain level, and days of headache in the 3 months post injection. Side effects were experienced by 13.5% of patients, with ptosis being the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in meaningful reductions in migraine-related disability, headache frequency, and pain intensity in patients with chronic migraine treated in a tertiary care center. These findings reinforce its role as an effective long-term preventive therapy and highlight the importance of maintaining consistent treatment cycles to sustain clinical benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"367-377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804470/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00809-4
Jin-Xi Xie, Xue Wang, Yang Li, Ye Zhang, Tao Liu, Ming-Ming Liu, Jun-Li Liu, Li-Wen Zhou
Introduction: Postoperative pain after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is prone to multiple complications, and opioids are accompanied by significant side effects. There is still unclear evidence regarding the combination of esketamine and lidocaine. This trial was designed to get into the bottom of the synergistic effect of esketamine and lidocaine on reducing opioid requirements in the elderly undergoing CRC surgery.
Methods: This study enrolled 151 patients to establish the control group (group C, n = 50), the esketamine group (group S, n = 50), and the esketamine + lidocaine group (group SL, n = 51). The primary endpoint was the total sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery.
Results: During the first 24 h postoperatively, compared with group C {103.22 μg (103.22 morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), 98.30-108.25 μg}, both group S (100.29 μg [100.29 MME], 99.60-104.43 μg) and group SL (95.13 μg [95.13 MME], 95.20-100.40 μg) had reduced dosage of sufentanil (mean, interquartile range [IQR]) (P < 0.001); while at the remaining time points, groups S/SL were also lower than group C (P < 0.05). The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores in the two postoperative days were lower in groups S/SL than in group C, even lower in group SL than group S (P < 0.001). The intraoperative heart rate and mean blood pressure were more likely to be elevated in group S than in group C, while it was lower in group SL than in group S (P < 0.05). Group SL had an accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal function and higher subjective postoperative recovery quality scores on the third and seventh postoperative days than group C (P < 0.05), as well as lower rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.022).
Conclusions: Esketamine combined with lidocaine may reduce opioid consumption, improve postoperative analgesia, and better maintain hemodynamic stability during CRC surgery in elderly patients.
Trial registration information: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300078997; registration date: 22 December 2023).
{"title":"Effect of Esketamine Combined with Lidocaine on Opioid Requirements in the Elderly Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jin-Xi Xie, Xue Wang, Yang Li, Ye Zhang, Tao Liu, Ming-Ming Liu, Jun-Li Liu, Li-Wen Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00809-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00809-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is prone to multiple complications, and opioids are accompanied by significant side effects. There is still unclear evidence regarding the combination of esketamine and lidocaine. This trial was designed to get into the bottom of the synergistic effect of esketamine and lidocaine on reducing opioid requirements in the elderly undergoing CRC surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 151 patients to establish the control group (group C, n = 50), the esketamine group (group S, n = 50), and the esketamine + lidocaine group (group SL, n = 51). The primary endpoint was the total sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first 24 h postoperatively, compared with group C {103.22 μg (103.22 morphine milligram equivalents [MME]), 98.30-108.25 μg}, both group S (100.29 μg [100.29 MME], 99.60-104.43 μg) and group SL (95.13 μg [95.13 MME], 95.20-100.40 μg) had reduced dosage of sufentanil (mean, interquartile range [IQR]) (P < 0.001); while at the remaining time points, groups S/SL were also lower than group C (P < 0.05). The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores in the two postoperative days were lower in groups S/SL than in group C, even lower in group SL than group S (P < 0.001). The intraoperative heart rate and mean blood pressure were more likely to be elevated in group S than in group C, while it was lower in group SL than in group S (P < 0.05). Group SL had an accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal function and higher subjective postoperative recovery quality scores on the third and seventh postoperative days than group C (P < 0.05), as well as lower rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Esketamine combined with lidocaine may reduce opioid consumption, improve postoperative analgesia, and better maintain hemodynamic stability during CRC surgery in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration no. ChiCTR2300078997; registration date: 22 December 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"391-416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804563/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145810722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00803-w
Mohammed Ahmed, Periklis Zavridis, Despina Hadjiconstanti, Panagiotis Zis
Introduction: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome affecting the pudendal nerve, often presenting with perineal or pelvic pain exacerbated by sitting. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the existing knowledge on the diagnosis and management of PN.
Methods: A PubMed database search identified 475 articles, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies focused on diagnostic strategies, and 26 on management.
Results: Diagnosis of PN is largely clinical, with the Nantes criteria providing a widely adopted framework. Imaging modalities such as MRI and MR neurography, along with neurophysiological tests including quantitative sensory testing, have been explored as adjuncts, though their roles remain limited. Pudendal nerve blocks are both diagnostic and therapeutic, with response rates up to 94%. Management follows a stepwise approach, beginning with conservative therapies and progressing to nerve blocks, and extending to neuromodulation or surgery when necessary. Pulsed radiofrequency and nerve stimulation techniques demonstrate promising results, with reported pain reduction in up to 95% of refractory cases, though long-term durability remains uncertain. Surgical decompression remains the most common operative option, with several techniques described.
Conclusions: Despite the established recognition of PN, there is a paucity of high-quality comparative studies and randomized controlled trials assessing diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. Current evidence suggests conservative measures and nerve blocks are sufficient for most patients, with stimulation techniques and decompression surgery reserved for refractory cases. Emerging modalities may offer future therapeutic options, but require validation in larger cohorts.
{"title":"The Diagnosis and Management of Pudendal Neuralgia.","authors":"Mohammed Ahmed, Periklis Zavridis, Despina Hadjiconstanti, Panagiotis Zis","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00803-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00803-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome affecting the pudendal nerve, often presenting with perineal or pelvic pain exacerbated by sitting. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the existing knowledge on the diagnosis and management of PN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed database search identified 475 articles, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies focused on diagnostic strategies, and 26 on management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnosis of PN is largely clinical, with the Nantes criteria providing a widely adopted framework. Imaging modalities such as MRI and MR neurography, along with neurophysiological tests including quantitative sensory testing, have been explored as adjuncts, though their roles remain limited. Pudendal nerve blocks are both diagnostic and therapeutic, with response rates up to 94%. Management follows a stepwise approach, beginning with conservative therapies and progressing to nerve blocks, and extending to neuromodulation or surgery when necessary. Pulsed radiofrequency and nerve stimulation techniques demonstrate promising results, with reported pain reduction in up to 95% of refractory cases, though long-term durability remains uncertain. Surgical decompression remains the most common operative option, with several techniques described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the established recognition of PN, there is a paucity of high-quality comparative studies and randomized controlled trials assessing diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. Current evidence suggests conservative measures and nerve blocks are sufficient for most patients, with stimulation techniques and decompression surgery reserved for refractory cases. Emerging modalities may offer future therapeutic options, but require validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"97-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804544/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00801-y
Virginie Guastella, Emeline Gueganno, Célian Bertin, David Balayssac, Bruno Pereira, Nicolas Authier
Introduction: Prescriptions of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) have increased in recent years, driven by their rapid onset and ease of administration compared to other opioids like morphine and oxycodone, especially for breakthrough pain. A 2022 study reported high rates of off-label TIRF use, particularly among general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of off-label TIRF use by GPs, and perceived efficacy for predictable pain associated with medical procedures. Secondary objectives included evaluating its use in other specific contexts such as swallowing or alertness disorders, acute pain, and overall tolerability.
Methods: A mixed-methods study was designed to combine qualitative interviews exploring clinical contexts with a quantitative cross-sectional survey assessing the prevalence of off-label use of TIRF among French GPs. Data were collected through a national online survey.
Results: A total of 682 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The study focused exclusively on off-label prescribing of TIRFs. Off-label use was reported by 46% of GPs across a variety of clinical indications. Specifically, 244 GPs (36%; 95% CI 32-40) reported prescribing TIRFs for procedural pain. Other off-label indications were also reported, including use for alertness disorders (24%; 95% CI 21-27), swallowing disorders (32%; 95% CI 28-35), and acute rheumatological pain (12%; 95% CI 9-14). These findings highlight a substantial level of off-label prescribing, with varying perceptions of efficacy and tolerability across different clinical contexts.
Conclusions: This study confirms widespread off-label TIRF use in well-defined clinical situations. While many GPs report positive outcomes, important concerns remain, including limited training, difficulty with dose titration, and the risk of use disorder. Targeted education and clearer prescribing guidelines could help ensure a safer and more appropriate use of TIRF in GPs practice.
简介:与吗啡、羟考酮等其他阿片类药物相比,经黏膜速释芬太尼(TIRF)的起效快、给药方便,尤其是治疗突发性疼痛,近年来芬太尼的处方越来越多。2022年的一项研究报告了标签外TIRF使用率很高,特别是在全科医生(gp)中。本研究旨在评估全科医生使用超说明书TIRF的流行程度和模式,以及对与医疗程序相关的可预测疼痛的感知疗效。次要目标包括评估其在其他特定情况下的使用,如吞咽或警觉性障碍,急性疼痛和整体耐受性。方法:设计了一项混合方法研究,将定性访谈与定量横断面调查相结合,探讨临床背景,评估法国全科医生超说明书使用TIRF的流行程度。数据是通过全国在线调查收集的。结果:共分析问卷682份。这项研究只关注了超说明书的TIRFs处方。46%的全科医生报告了各种临床适应症的超说明书使用。具体来说,244名全科医生(36%;95% CI 32-40)报告为程序性疼痛开具了tirf处方。其他说明书外适应症也有报道,包括用于警觉性障碍(24%;95% CI 21-27)、吞咽障碍(32%;95% CI 28-35)和急性风湿病痛(12%;95% CI 9-14)。这些发现强调了标签外处方的大量存在,在不同的临床背景下对疗效和耐受性的看法各不相同。结论:这项研究证实了在明确的临床情况下广泛使用标签外TIRF。虽然许多全科医生报告了积极的结果,但重要的问题仍然存在,包括培训有限,剂量滴定困难以及使用障碍的风险。有针对性的教育和更明确的处方指南可以帮助确保全科医生在实践中更安全、更适当地使用TIRF。
{"title":"Prevalence and Patterns of Off-Label Transmucosal Immediate-Release Fentanyl Use in French General Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on a Voluntary Online Survey.","authors":"Virginie Guastella, Emeline Gueganno, Célian Bertin, David Balayssac, Bruno Pereira, Nicolas Authier","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00801-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00801-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescriptions of transmucosal immediate-release fentanyl (TIRF) have increased in recent years, driven by their rapid onset and ease of administration compared to other opioids like morphine and oxycodone, especially for breakthrough pain. A 2022 study reported high rates of off-label TIRF use, particularly among general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of off-label TIRF use by GPs, and perceived efficacy for predictable pain associated with medical procedures. Secondary objectives included evaluating its use in other specific contexts such as swallowing or alertness disorders, acute pain, and overall tolerability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was designed to combine qualitative interviews exploring clinical contexts with a quantitative cross-sectional survey assessing the prevalence of off-label use of TIRF among French GPs. Data were collected through a national online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 682 completed questionnaires were analyzed. The study focused exclusively on off-label prescribing of TIRFs. Off-label use was reported by 46% of GPs across a variety of clinical indications. Specifically, 244 GPs (36%; 95% CI 32-40) reported prescribing TIRFs for procedural pain. Other off-label indications were also reported, including use for alertness disorders (24%; 95% CI 21-27), swallowing disorders (32%; 95% CI 28-35), and acute rheumatological pain (12%; 95% CI 9-14). These findings highlight a substantial level of off-label prescribing, with varying perceptions of efficacy and tolerability across different clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms widespread off-label TIRF use in well-defined clinical situations. While many GPs report positive outcomes, important concerns remain, including limited training, difficulty with dose titration, and the risk of use disorder. Targeted education and clearer prescribing guidelines could help ensure a safer and more appropriate use of TIRF in GPs practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"311-324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804524/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145725156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-13DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00804-9
Istvan S Szilagyi, Torsten Ullrich, Christoph Klivinyi, Kordula Lang-Illievich, Connor T A Brenna, Brigitte Messerer, Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
Introduction: Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction. Smoking may impact pain perception and analgesic requirements, but its effects on postoperative opioid needs remain unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients who smoke have different postoperative opioid requirements compared to nonsmokers in the first 24 and 48 h after surgery.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing postoperative opioid use between smokers and nonsmokers. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Web of Science and PubMed databases. Opioid doses were converted to morphine equivalents for comparison. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes.
Results: Eight studies (784 patients) were included for the primary 24-h outcome and seven studies (1164 patients) for the 48-h outcome. Meta-analysis showed significantly higher opioid requirements in smokers compared to nonsmokers at both 24 h (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.06, p < 0.00001) and 48 h postoperatively (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.74, p < 0.00001). On average, smokers required 33.7% more opioids than nonsmokers. Smokers also reported significantly higher pain scores 24 h after surgery (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.26-0.92, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Despite low-quality evidence due to non-randomized study designs, this meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who smoke have significantly higher postoperative opioid requirements and pain scores than nonsmokers. These findings highlight the need to consider smoking status when developing postoperative pain management strategies. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this relationship and optimize pain control in smokers.
有效的术后疼痛管理对患者的康复和满意度至关重要。吸烟可能影响疼痛感知和镇痛需求,但其对术后阿片类药物需求的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定吸烟患者在术后24小时和48小时内与不吸烟者相比是否有不同的阿片类药物需求。方法:我们对吸烟者和非吸烟者术后阿片类药物使用的比较研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。在Web of Science和PubMed数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。阿片类药物剂量转换为吗啡当量进行比较。随机效应荟萃分析用于计算合并效应大小。结果:8项研究(784例患者)纳入了24小时的主要结果,7项研究(1164例患者)纳入了48小时的主要结果。meta分析显示,吸烟者在24小时内的阿片类药物需求明显高于不吸烟者(标准化平均差[SMD] 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.06, p)。结论:尽管由于非随机研究设计,证据质量较低,但该meta分析表明,吸烟患者术后阿片类药物需求和疼痛评分明显高于不吸烟者。这些发现强调了在制定术后疼痛管理策略时考虑吸烟状况的必要性。需要进一步的研究来阐明这种关系的机制并优化吸烟者的疼痛控制。
{"title":"Association Between Smoking and Opioid Requirement and Pain Intensity in the Early Postoperative Period: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Istvan S Szilagyi, Torsten Ullrich, Christoph Klivinyi, Kordula Lang-Illievich, Connor T A Brenna, Brigitte Messerer, Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00804-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00804-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction. Smoking may impact pain perception and analgesic requirements, but its effects on postoperative opioid needs remain unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients who smoke have different postoperative opioid requirements compared to nonsmokers in the first 24 and 48 h after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing postoperative opioid use between smokers and nonsmokers. A comprehensive literature search was performed in Web of Science and PubMed databases. Opioid doses were converted to morphine equivalents for comparison. Random effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (784 patients) were included for the primary 24-h outcome and seven studies (1164 patients) for the 48-h outcome. Meta-analysis showed significantly higher opioid requirements in smokers compared to nonsmokers at both 24 h (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.06, p < 0.00001) and 48 h postoperatively (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.74, p < 0.00001). On average, smokers required 33.7% more opioids than nonsmokers. Smokers also reported significantly higher pain scores 24 h after surgery (SMD 0.59, 95% CI 0.26-0.92, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite low-quality evidence due to non-randomized study designs, this meta-analysis demonstrates that patients who smoke have significantly higher postoperative opioid requirements and pain scores than nonsmokers. These findings highlight the need to consider smoking status when developing postoperative pain management strategies. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this relationship and optimize pain control in smokers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"341-365"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804480/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145743668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00807-6
Burhan Dost, Madan Narayanan, Francesco Marrone, Alessandro De Cassai, Serkan Tulgar, Can Aksu, Peter Merjavy, Ki Jinn Chin
Introduction: The sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) block is a recently described regional anesthesia technique that targets sacral dermatomes. First reported in 2019, it has been increasingly explored as a potential option for perioperative analgesia in surgeries involving the sacral, perineal, and pelvic regions. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the current anatomical, technical, and clinical evidence on the S-ESP block, outlining its mechanisms of action, approaches, efficacy, and safety while identifying research gaps and future directions.
Methods: We performed a narrative review integrating anatomical descriptions, sonographic techniques, and available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical efficacy of the S-ESP block. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid (Medline) from inception to July 21, 2025, without language or date restrictions. Full-text RCTs investigating ultrasound-guided S-ESP blocks for perioperative analgesia were reviewed and summarized.
Results: Fourteen RCTs (published 2023-2025) were included, conducted predominantly in Turkey, India, and Egypt, spanning pediatric (6 months to 12 years) and adult populations undergoing circumcision, hypospadias repair, hemorrhoidectomy, pilonidal sinus surgery, transurethral resection of prostate, lumbar discectomy, and total hip arthroplasty. Most pediatric trials compared midline S-ESP with caudal or penile blocks, generally demonstrating a longer time to first rescue analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic consumption, although one study reported a superior duration with caudal block. In adults, the S-ESP block consistently reduced pain scores and opioid requirements.
Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that both midline and paramedian S-ESP techniques are technically feasible, appear safe in the short term, and provide clinically relevant postoperative analgesia in selected pediatric urogenital, adult anorectal, and orthopedic surgeries. However, heterogeneity in techniques, small single-center samples, and a narrow range of indications limit its generalizability. Large, multicenter RCTs with standardized protocols are needed to clarify the optimal approaches, dosing strategies, and comparative role of S-ESP block versus established neuraxial and peripheral techniques.
骶竖脊平面阻滞(S-ESP)是最近报道的一种针对骶皮节的区域麻醉技术。首次报道于2019年,它已被越来越多地探索作为涉及骶骨、会阴和骨盆区域的手术围手术期镇痛的潜在选择。本文旨在总结和批判性地评估目前关于S-ESP阻滞的解剖学、技术和临床证据,概述其作用机制、方法、疗效和安全性,同时确定研究空白和未来方向。方法:我们综合解剖描述、超声技术和随机对照试验(rct)对S-ESP阻滞的临床疗效进行了叙述性回顾。在PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science和Ovid (Medline)中进行了全面的文献检索,从创立到2025年7月21日,没有语言或日期限制。本文对超声引导下S-ESP阻滞围手术期镇痛的随机对照试验进行综述。结果:纳入14项随机对照试验(发表于2023-2025年),主要在土耳其、印度和埃及进行,涵盖儿童(6个月至12岁)和接受包皮环切术、尿道下裂修复术、痔疮切除术、毛窦手术、经尿道前列腺切除术、腰椎间盘切除术和全髋关节置换术的成人人群。大多数儿科试验比较了中线S-ESP与尾侧阻滞或阴茎阻滞,通常表明首次抢救镇痛时间更长,术后镇痛消耗减少,尽管一项研究报告了尾侧阻滞的持续时间更长。在成人中,S-ESP阻滞持续降低疼痛评分和阿片类药物需求。结论:目前的证据表明,中线和旁线S-ESP技术在技术上是可行的,在短期内是安全的,并且在特定的儿科泌尿生殖、成人肛肠和骨科手术中提供临床相关的术后镇痛。然而,技术的异质性、小的单中心样本和狭窄的适应症范围限制了其普遍性。需要采用标准化方案的大型多中心随机对照试验来明确最佳方法、给药策略,以及S-ESP阻滞与已建立的神经轴和外周技术的比较作用。
{"title":"The Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Burhan Dost, Madan Narayanan, Francesco Marrone, Alessandro De Cassai, Serkan Tulgar, Can Aksu, Peter Merjavy, Ki Jinn Chin","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00807-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00807-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The sacral erector spinae plane (S-ESP) block is a recently described regional anesthesia technique that targets sacral dermatomes. First reported in 2019, it has been increasingly explored as a potential option for perioperative analgesia in surgeries involving the sacral, perineal, and pelvic regions. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the current anatomical, technical, and clinical evidence on the S-ESP block, outlining its mechanisms of action, approaches, efficacy, and safety while identifying research gaps and future directions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a narrative review integrating anatomical descriptions, sonographic techniques, and available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical efficacy of the S-ESP block. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Ovid (Medline) from inception to July 21, 2025, without language or date restrictions. Full-text RCTs investigating ultrasound-guided S-ESP blocks for perioperative analgesia were reviewed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen RCTs (published 2023-2025) were included, conducted predominantly in Turkey, India, and Egypt, spanning pediatric (6 months to 12 years) and adult populations undergoing circumcision, hypospadias repair, hemorrhoidectomy, pilonidal sinus surgery, transurethral resection of prostate, lumbar discectomy, and total hip arthroplasty. Most pediatric trials compared midline S-ESP with caudal or penile blocks, generally demonstrating a longer time to first rescue analgesia and reduced postoperative analgesic consumption, although one study reported a superior duration with caudal block. In adults, the S-ESP block consistently reduced pain scores and opioid requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence suggests that both midline and paramedian S-ESP techniques are technically feasible, appear safe in the short term, and provide clinically relevant postoperative analgesia in selected pediatric urogenital, adult anorectal, and orthopedic surgeries. However, heterogeneity in techniques, small single-center samples, and a narrow range of indications limit its generalizability. Large, multicenter RCTs with standardized protocols are needed to clarify the optimal approaches, dosing strategies, and comparative role of S-ESP block versus established neuraxial and peripheral techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"131-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804462/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145810750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-stroke pain (PSP) and post-stroke depression (PSD) represent two major neuropsychiatric complications that frequently co-occur, with comorbidity rates ranging from 34 to 65.6%. Despite their high prevalence and profound impact on functional recovery and quality of life, the shared mechanisms and optimal management of this complex comorbidity remain poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidence to explore the epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic challenges, neurobiological underpinnings, and therapeutic strategies for comorbid PSP and PSD. Special emphasis was placed on neuroinflammatory cascades, glial cell dysfunction, monoaminergic system dysregulation, and maladaptive neural circuit remodeling. We found PSP and PSD exhibit overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms, including microglial activation, astrocytic reactivity, pro-inflammatory cytokine release (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), and dysregulation of cortico-limbic circuits involving the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and ventral tegmental area. Pharmacotherapies such as serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., ketamine), as well as neuromodulation approaches (e.g., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS], transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]), demonstrate efficacy in both conditions, likely through anti-inflammatory and neural circuit-modulating effects. We speculate that the comorbidity of PSP and PSD is underpinned by convergent neuroimmune and neural circuit mechanisms. Targeting these shared pathways-such as with cytokine inhibitors, glial modulators, and circuit-specific neuromodulation-holds promise for developing integrated, mechanism-based therapies. Future research should prioritize multimodal treatment strategies tailored to the neurobiological signatures of this debilitating post-stroke syndrome. Infographic available for this article.
{"title":"Shared Mechanisms and Integrated Management of Post-Stroke Pain and Depression: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Yujia Jin, Fan Wu, Meng Jin, Lili Tang, Yuxiao Chen, Zhiming Xu, Wei Wang, Jian Wu","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00795-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00795-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-stroke pain (PSP) and post-stroke depression (PSD) represent two major neuropsychiatric complications that frequently co-occur, with comorbidity rates ranging from 34 to 65.6%. Despite their high prevalence and profound impact on functional recovery and quality of life, the shared mechanisms and optimal management of this complex comorbidity remain poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical evidence to explore the epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic challenges, neurobiological underpinnings, and therapeutic strategies for comorbid PSP and PSD. Special emphasis was placed on neuroinflammatory cascades, glial cell dysfunction, monoaminergic system dysregulation, and maladaptive neural circuit remodeling. We found PSP and PSD exhibit overlapping pathophysiological mechanisms, including microglial activation, astrocytic reactivity, pro-inflammatory cytokine release (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), and dysregulation of cortico-limbic circuits involving the anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, and ventral tegmental area. Pharmacotherapies such as serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., ketamine), as well as neuromodulation approaches (e.g., repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS], transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]), demonstrate efficacy in both conditions, likely through anti-inflammatory and neural circuit-modulating effects. We speculate that the comorbidity of PSP and PSD is underpinned by convergent neuroimmune and neural circuit mechanisms. Targeting these shared pathways-such as with cytokine inhibitors, glial modulators, and circuit-specific neuromodulation-holds promise for developing integrated, mechanism-based therapies. Future research should prioritize multimodal treatment strategies tailored to the neurobiological signatures of this debilitating post-stroke syndrome. Infographic available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"19-39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804574/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145541795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-11DOI: 10.1007/s40122-025-00800-z
Richard B Lipton, Linda Mosher, Robert J Fountaine
Introduction: This study aimed to assess changes in patient-reported outcomes during open-label acute treatment of migraine with zavegepant for up to 52 weeks.
Methods: Data were from a phase 2/3, open-label, long-term safety study of zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Participants with migraine treated migraine attacks of any intensity as needed with one dose of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray, up to once per day and up to eight times per 28 days, for up to 52 weeks. Pre-specified exploratory endpoints included change in number of migraine days/month, change in Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Scale, change in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life version 2.1 (MSQ v2.1), and Satisfaction with Medication.
Results: A total of 603 treated participants were analyzed. Zavegepant treatment was associated with mean reductions of 1.7 migraine days/month of any pain intensity and 1.1 migraine days/month of moderate or severe pain intensity. Zavegepant treatment was associated with improvement in mean MIDAS total score of - 8.2 (95% CI - 9.89, - 6.55) at week 12 and - 8.8 (95% CI - 11.13, - 6.50) at week 52. At week 12 and week 52, respectively, zavegepant treatment was associated with improvements in mean MSQ Role Function Restrictive domain score of 8.6 (95% CI 7.09, 10.16) and 13.8 (95% CI 11.76, 15.85), improvement in Role Function Preventive domain score of 6.7 (95% CI 5.25, 8.11) and 10.1 (95% CI 8.08, 12.13), and improvement in Emotional Function domain score of 6.8 (95% CI 4.87, 8.72) and 11.3 (95% CI 8.99, 13.70). At week 52, 44.2% (125/283) of participants were completely or very satisfied with zavegepant and 28.6% (81/283) were somewhat satisfied; 124 participants did not complete the Satisfaction with Medication scale at week 52.
Conclusion: Through the 52-week study, acute treatment with zavegepant was associated with reduction in mean number of migraine days/month, improvements in migraine-related disability and migraine-specific quality of life, and high levels of patient satisfaction.
本研究旨在评估开放标签偏头痛急性治疗zavegepant长达52周期间患者报告结果的变化。方法:数据来自zaveggepant急性治疗偏头痛的2/3期、开放标签、长期安全性研究。偏头痛患者根据需要使用一剂10mg的zavegepent鼻喷雾剂治疗任何强度的偏头痛发作,每天最多一次,每28天最多八次,长达52周。预先指定的探索性终点包括偏头痛天数/月的变化,偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)量表的变化,偏头痛特异性生活质量2.1版本(MSQ v2.1)的变化,以及对药物的满意度。结果:共分析了603名治疗参与者。Zavegepant治疗与任何疼痛强度的偏头痛平均减少1.7天/月和中度或重度疼痛强度的偏头痛平均减少1.1天/月相关。zavegpant治疗与第12周平均MIDAS总评分的改善相关,分别为- 8.2 (95% CI - 9.89, - 6.55)和- 8.8 (95% CI - 11.13, - 6.50)。在第12周和第52周,zavegpant治疗分别与MSQ角色功能限制域评分8.6 (95% CI 7.09, 10.16)和13.8 (95% CI 11.76, 15.85)的平均改善相关,角色功能预防域评分6.7 (95% CI 5.25, 8.11)和10.1 (95% CI 8.08, 12.13)的改善相关,情绪功能域评分6.8 (95% CI 4.87, 8.72)和11.3 (95% CI 8.99, 13.70)的改善相关。在第52周,44.2%(125/283)的参与者对zavegepant完全满意或非常满意,28.6%(81/283)的参与者对zavegepant比较满意;124名受试者在第52周未完成用药满意度量表。结论:通过52周的研究,zavegepant急性治疗与平均偏头痛天数/月减少,偏头痛相关残疾和偏头痛特异性生活质量改善以及患者满意度高相关。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT04408794。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes During the Acute Treatment of Migraine with Zavegepant Nasal Spray: Results from a 52-Week, Open-Label Study.","authors":"Richard B Lipton, Linda Mosher, Robert J Fountaine","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00800-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00800-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess changes in patient-reported outcomes during open-label acute treatment of migraine with zavegepant for up to 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from a phase 2/3, open-label, long-term safety study of zavegepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Participants with migraine treated migraine attacks of any intensity as needed with one dose of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray, up to once per day and up to eight times per 28 days, for up to 52 weeks. Pre-specified exploratory endpoints included change in number of migraine days/month, change in Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Scale, change in Migraine-Specific Quality of Life version 2.1 (MSQ v2.1), and Satisfaction with Medication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 603 treated participants were analyzed. Zavegepant treatment was associated with mean reductions of 1.7 migraine days/month of any pain intensity and 1.1 migraine days/month of moderate or severe pain intensity. Zavegepant treatment was associated with improvement in mean MIDAS total score of - 8.2 (95% CI - 9.89, - 6.55) at week 12 and - 8.8 (95% CI - 11.13, - 6.50) at week 52. At week 12 and week 52, respectively, zavegepant treatment was associated with improvements in mean MSQ Role Function Restrictive domain score of 8.6 (95% CI 7.09, 10.16) and 13.8 (95% CI 11.76, 15.85), improvement in Role Function Preventive domain score of 6.7 (95% CI 5.25, 8.11) and 10.1 (95% CI 8.08, 12.13), and improvement in Emotional Function domain score of 6.8 (95% CI 4.87, 8.72) and 11.3 (95% CI 8.99, 13.70). At week 52, 44.2% (125/283) of participants were completely or very satisfied with zavegepant and 28.6% (81/283) were somewhat satisfied; 124 participants did not complete the Satisfaction with Medication scale at week 52.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through the 52-week study, acute treatment with zavegepant was associated with reduction in mean number of migraine days/month, improvements in migraine-related disability and migraine-specific quality of life, and high levels of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04408794.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"325-340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804456/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145725035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Axial pain is a common complication following expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty (ELAP); however, traditional statistical methods are unable to effectively predict this complication. This study developed machine learning (ML) models to predict post-ELAP axial pain and identify key predictors.
Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 851 cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients undergoing ELAP, split into training (n = 714) and temporal validation sets (n = 137). Demographic, imaging, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Predictive features were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, followed by ML model development with grid search optimizing hyperparameters. The top-performing model underwent temporal validation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyzed predictor contributions.
Results: The training set included 218 axial pain cases; the test set had 47. Key predictors (C7 laminoplasty, cervical kyphosis, etc.) were identified to develop ML model. Post-optimization, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved superior performance (internal validation area under the receiver [AUC] = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.918-0.978), maintained in temporal validation (AUC = 0.906; 95% CI 0.858-0.954). Through SHAP analysis, the predictors were ranked in descending order of importance as follows: C7 laminoplasty, quantity-based surgical segment classification, cervical kyphosis, angle of lamina open-door, cervical lordosis, and occupying rate of cervical spinal canal.
Conclusions: ML models coupled with SHAP analysis effectively predict post-ELAP axial pain, identifying the key predictors. Performing segment-selective ELAP, avoiding unnecessary C7 laminoplasty, and maintaining optimal open-door angle are critical factors in avoiding the occurrence of axial pain following ELAP.
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction for Axial Pain Following Expansive Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kelun Huang, Sheng Li, Yile Dai, Dingjun Xu, Guoliang Chen, Yaozhi He, Ziwei Fan, Honglin Teng","doi":"10.1007/s40122-025-00802-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40122-025-00802-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Axial pain is a common complication following expansive unilateral open-door laminoplasty (ELAP); however, traditional statistical methods are unable to effectively predict this complication. This study developed machine learning (ML) models to predict post-ELAP axial pain and identify key predictors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 851 cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients undergoing ELAP, split into training (n = 714) and temporal validation sets (n = 137). Demographic, imaging, clinical, and surgical data were collected. Predictive features were selected by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression, followed by ML model development with grid search optimizing hyperparameters. The top-performing model underwent temporal validation, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analyzed predictor contributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The training set included 218 axial pain cases; the test set had 47. Key predictors (C7 laminoplasty, cervical kyphosis, etc.) were identified to develop ML model. Post-optimization, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved superior performance (internal validation area under the receiver [AUC] = 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.918-0.978), maintained in temporal validation (AUC = 0.906; 95% CI 0.858-0.954). Through SHAP analysis, the predictors were ranked in descending order of importance as follows: C7 laminoplasty, quantity-based surgical segment classification, cervical kyphosis, angle of lamina open-door, cervical lordosis, and occupying rate of cervical spinal canal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML models coupled with SHAP analysis effectively predict post-ELAP axial pain, identifying the key predictors. Performing segment-selective ELAP, avoiding unnecessary C7 laminoplasty, and maintaining optimal open-door angle are critical factors in avoiding the occurrence of axial pain following ELAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"291-309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804451/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145715328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}