Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003305
Eva Kosek
Abstract: Nociplastic pain, a third mechanistic pain descriptor in addition to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, was adopted in 2017 by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). It is defined as "pain that arises from altered nociception" not fully explained by nociceptive or neuropathic pain mechanisms. Peripheral and/or central sensitization, manifesting as allodynia and hyperalgesia, is typically present, although not specific for nociplastic pain. Criteria for possible nociplastic pain manifesting in the musculoskeletal system define a minimum of 4 conditions: (1) pain duration of more than 3 months; (2) regional, multifocal or widespread rather than discrete distribution of pain; (3) pain cannot entirely be explained by nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms; and (4) clinical signs of pain hypersensitivity present in the region of pain. Educational endeavors and field testing of criteria are needed. Pharmacological treatment guidelines, based on the three pain types, need to be developed. Currently pharmacological treatments of nociplastic pain resemble those of neuropathic; however, opioids should be avoided. A major challenge is to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms driving altered nociception in patients suffering from nociplastic pain. Examples from fibromyalgia would include pathophysiology of the peripheral as well as central nervous system, such as autoreactive antibodies acting at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and aberrant cerebral pain processing, including altered brain network architecture. Understanding pathophysiological mechanisms and their interactions is a prerequisite for the development of diagnostic tests allowing for individualized treatments and development of new strategies for prevention and treatment.
{"title":"The concept of nociplastic pain-where to from here?","authors":"Eva Kosek","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003305","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Nociplastic pain, a third mechanistic pain descriptor in addition to nociceptive and neuropathic pain, was adopted in 2017 by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). It is defined as \"pain that arises from altered nociception\" not fully explained by nociceptive or neuropathic pain mechanisms. Peripheral and/or central sensitization, manifesting as allodynia and hyperalgesia, is typically present, although not specific for nociplastic pain. Criteria for possible nociplastic pain manifesting in the musculoskeletal system define a minimum of 4 conditions: (1) pain duration of more than 3 months; (2) regional, multifocal or widespread rather than discrete distribution of pain; (3) pain cannot entirely be explained by nociceptive or neuropathic mechanisms; and (4) clinical signs of pain hypersensitivity present in the region of pain. Educational endeavors and field testing of criteria are needed. Pharmacological treatment guidelines, based on the three pain types, need to be developed. Currently pharmacological treatments of nociplastic pain resemble those of neuropathic; however, opioids should be avoided. A major challenge is to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms driving altered nociception in patients suffering from nociplastic pain. Examples from fibromyalgia would include pathophysiology of the peripheral as well as central nervous system, such as autoreactive antibodies acting at the level of the dorsal root ganglia and aberrant cerebral pain processing, including altered brain network architecture. Understanding pathophysiological mechanisms and their interactions is a prerequisite for the development of diagnostic tests allowing for individualized treatments and development of new strategies for prevention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11S","pages":"S50-S57"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003369
Mary Suma Cardosa
Abstract: The burden of pain in low- and middle income countries (LMICs) is high and expected to rise further with their ageing populations. Multidisciplinary pain management approaches based on the biopsychosocial model of pain have been shown to be effective in reducing pain-related distress and disability, but these approaches are still lacking in many LMICs due to various factors, including low levels of awareness about the role of multidisciplinary pain clinics, lack of prioritisation for pain services, and lack of healthcare professionals trained in pain management. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has several educational programs to promote multidisciplinary pain management in LMICs, in the form of education grants, pain fellowships, pain camps and, most recently, the development of a Multidisciplinary Pain Centre Toolkit. This article describes the various educational programs, focusing on Southeast Asia, that demonstrate how targeted educational programs which include skills training, follow-up and mentorship, can translate into the formation of new multidisciplinary pain management services in settings with limited resources.
摘要:中低收入国家(LMICs)的疼痛负担很重,而且预计随着人口老龄化还会进一步加重。基于疼痛的生物-心理-社会模式的多学科疼痛管理方法已被证明能有效减少与疼痛相关的痛苦和残疾,但由于各种因素,包括对多学科疼痛诊所的作用认识不足、疼痛服务缺乏优先次序以及缺乏受过疼痛管理培训的医疗保健专业人员等,这些方法在许多低收入和中等收入国家仍然缺乏。国际疼痛研究协会(International Association for the Study of Pain,IASP)开展了多项教育计划,以教育补助金、疼痛研究金、疼痛营以及最近开发的多学科疼痛中心工具包等形式,在低收入国家和地区推广多学科疼痛管理。本文介绍了以东南亚为重点的各种教育项目,展示了包括技能培训、跟踪和指导在内的有针对性的教育项目如何在资源有限的环境中形成新的多学科疼痛管理服务。
{"title":"Promoting multidisciplinary pain management in low- and middle-income countries-challenges and achievements.","authors":"Mary Suma Cardosa","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003369","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003369","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The burden of pain in low- and middle income countries (LMICs) is high and expected to rise further with their ageing populations. Multidisciplinary pain management approaches based on the biopsychosocial model of pain have been shown to be effective in reducing pain-related distress and disability, but these approaches are still lacking in many LMICs due to various factors, including low levels of awareness about the role of multidisciplinary pain clinics, lack of prioritisation for pain services, and lack of healthcare professionals trained in pain management. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) has several educational programs to promote multidisciplinary pain management in LMICs, in the form of education grants, pain fellowships, pain camps and, most recently, the development of a Multidisciplinary Pain Centre Toolkit. This article describes the various educational programs, focusing on Southeast Asia, that demonstrate how targeted educational programs which include skills training, follow-up and mentorship, can translate into the formation of new multidisciplinary pain management services in settings with limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11S","pages":"S39-S49"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-06-03DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003292
Emma Hertel, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen
{"title":"An attempt to identify nociceptive and nociplastic pain profiles using a clinical test for joint pain.","authors":"Emma Hertel, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003292","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11","pages":"2398-2400"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142505704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-06-04DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003280
Lars Grøvle, Eivind Hasvik, René Holst, Anders Sætre, Jens Ivar Brox, Ståle Mathiassen, Kjersti Myhre, Thor Einar Holmgard, Anne Julsrud Haugen
Abstract: This trial assessed the efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica in outpatient clinics across 4 Norwegian hospitals. A total of 123 adults with radiating pain below the knee (≥4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) and signs consistent with nerve root involvement were included. Participants were randomized to receive either naproxen 500 mg or a placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome, daily leg pain intensity measured on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale throughout the treatment period, revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of naproxen, with an adjusted mean difference of -0.5 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.1, P = 0.015). In the naproxen group, the treatment effect was significantly related to time, and over the whole 10-day period, the average adjusted difference was -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.5). Mean numbers needed to treat for 30% and 50% improvement were 9.9 (95% CI 4.7-15.0) and 20.7 (8.7-32.7), respectively. The adjusted mean difference for back pain was -0.4 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.0), and for Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, it was -1.5 (95% CI -3.0 to 0.0). No differences were found for sciatica bothersomeness or consumption of rescue medication or opioids. Participants in the naproxen group exhibited an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-16.2) for improvement by 1 level on the global perceived change scale. In conclusion, naproxen treatment showed small, likely clinically unimportant benefits compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica.
摘要:该试验评估了萘普生对挪威4家医院门诊坐骨神经痛患者的疗效。共有123名患有膝下放射痛(在0-10数字评分表中≥4分)并伴有神经根受累症状的成人参加了该试验。受试者被随机分配接受萘普生 500 毫克或安慰剂治疗,每天两次,为期 10 天。主要研究结果显示,在整个治疗期间,以0至10分的数字评分量表测量的每日腿部疼痛强度与萘普生的差异具有统计学意义,调整后的平均差异为-0.5(95% CI -0.8至-0.1,P = 0.015)。在萘普生组,治疗效果与时间显著相关,在整个10天期间,调整后的平均差异为-0.6(95% CI -0.8至-0.5)。改善 30% 和 50% 所需的平均治疗人数分别为 9.9 (95% CI 4.7-15.0) 和 20.7 (8.7-32.7)。背痛的调整后平均差异为-0.4(95% CI -0.8至0.0),坐骨神经痛罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷的调整后平均差异为-1.5(95% CI -3.0至0.0)。在坐骨神经痛的痛苦程度、抢救药物或阿片类药物的使用量方面没有发现差异。萘普生治疗组的参与者在总体感觉变化量表上改善一级的调整后几率为 4.7(95% CI 1.3-16.2)。总之,与安慰剂相比,萘普生治疗对中度至重度坐骨神经痛患者的疗效较小,而且在临床上可能并不重要。
{"title":"Efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica: multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Lars Grøvle, Eivind Hasvik, René Holst, Anders Sætre, Jens Ivar Brox, Ståle Mathiassen, Kjersti Myhre, Thor Einar Holmgard, Anne Julsrud Haugen","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003280","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003280","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This trial assessed the efficacy of naproxen in patients with sciatica in outpatient clinics across 4 Norwegian hospitals. A total of 123 adults with radiating pain below the knee (≥4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale) and signs consistent with nerve root involvement were included. Participants were randomized to receive either naproxen 500 mg or a placebo twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome, daily leg pain intensity measured on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale throughout the treatment period, revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of naproxen, with an adjusted mean difference of -0.5 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.1, P = 0.015). In the naproxen group, the treatment effect was significantly related to time, and over the whole 10-day period, the average adjusted difference was -0.6 (95% CI -0.8 to -0.5). Mean numbers needed to treat for 30% and 50% improvement were 9.9 (95% CI 4.7-15.0) and 20.7 (8.7-32.7), respectively. The adjusted mean difference for back pain was -0.4 (95% CI -0.8 to 0.0), and for Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, it was -1.5 (95% CI -3.0 to 0.0). No differences were found for sciatica bothersomeness or consumption of rescue medication or opioids. Participants in the naproxen group exhibited an adjusted odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI 1.3-16.2) for improvement by 1 level on the global perceived change scale. In conclusion, naproxen treatment showed small, likely clinically unimportant benefits compared with placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe sciatica.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"2606-2614"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141248381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-05-14DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003270
Dale J Langford, Remington P Mark, Fallon O France, Mahd Nishtar, Meghan Park, Sonia Sharma, Isabel C Shklyar, Thomas J Schnitzer, Philip G Conaghan, Dagmar Amtmann, Bryce B Reeve, Dennis C Turk, Robert H Dworkin, Jennifer S Gewandter
Abstract: Establishing clinically meaningful changes in pain experiences remains important for clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Regulatory guidance and pain measurement initiatives have recommended including patient-reported global assessment measures (eg, Patient-Global Impression of Change [PGIC]) to aid interpretation of within-patient differences in domain-specific clinical trial outcomes (eg, pain intensity). The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the frequency of global assessment measures inclusion, types of measures, domains assessed, number and types of response options, and how measures were analyzed. Of 4172 abstracts screened across 6 pain specialty journals, we reviewed 96 clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Fifty-two (54.2%) studies included a global assessment measure. The PGIC was most common (n = 28; 53.8%), with relatively infrequent use of other measures. The majority of studies that used a global assessment measure (n = 31; 59.6%) assessed change or improvement in an unspecified domain. Others assessed overall condition severity (n = 9; 17.3%), satisfaction (n = 8; 15.4%), or overall health status/recovery (n = 5; 9.6%). The number, range, and type of response options were variable and frequently not reported. Response options and reference periods even differed within the PGIC. Global assessment measures were most commonly analyzed as continuous variables (n = 24; 46.2%) or as dichotomous variables with positive categories combined to calculate the proportion of participants with a positive response to treatment (n = 18; 34.6%). This review highlights the substantial work necessary to clarify measurement and use of patient global assessment in chronic pain trials and provides short- and long-term considerations for measure selection, reporting and analysis, and measure development.
{"title":"Use of patient-reported global assessment measures in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: ACTTION systematic review and considerations.","authors":"Dale J Langford, Remington P Mark, Fallon O France, Mahd Nishtar, Meghan Park, Sonia Sharma, Isabel C Shklyar, Thomas J Schnitzer, Philip G Conaghan, Dagmar Amtmann, Bryce B Reeve, Dennis C Turk, Robert H Dworkin, Jennifer S Gewandter","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003270","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003270","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Establishing clinically meaningful changes in pain experiences remains important for clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Regulatory guidance and pain measurement initiatives have recommended including patient-reported global assessment measures (eg, Patient-Global Impression of Change [PGIC]) to aid interpretation of within-patient differences in domain-specific clinical trial outcomes (eg, pain intensity). The objectives of this systematic review were to determine the frequency of global assessment measures inclusion, types of measures, domains assessed, number and types of response options, and how measures were analyzed. Of 4172 abstracts screened across 6 pain specialty journals, we reviewed 96 clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Fifty-two (54.2%) studies included a global assessment measure. The PGIC was most common (n = 28; 53.8%), with relatively infrequent use of other measures. The majority of studies that used a global assessment measure (n = 31; 59.6%) assessed change or improvement in an unspecified domain. Others assessed overall condition severity (n = 9; 17.3%), satisfaction (n = 8; 15.4%), or overall health status/recovery (n = 5; 9.6%). The number, range, and type of response options were variable and frequently not reported. Response options and reference periods even differed within the PGIC. Global assessment measures were most commonly analyzed as continuous variables (n = 24; 46.2%) or as dichotomous variables with positive categories combined to calculate the proportion of participants with a positive response to treatment (n = 18; 34.6%). This review highlights the substantial work necessary to clarify measurement and use of patient global assessment in chronic pain trials and provides short- and long-term considerations for measure selection, reporting and analysis, and measure development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"2445-2454"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140922661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-04-02DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003241
Sarah Nelson, Morgan Mitcheson, Bridget Nestor, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, David Borsook
{"title":"Biomarkers of stress as mind-body intervention outcomes for chronic pain: an evaluation of constructs and accepted measurement.","authors":"Sarah Nelson, Morgan Mitcheson, Bridget Nestor, Michelle Bosquet Enlow, David Borsook","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003241","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003241","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":" ","pages":"2403-2408"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11445401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140336496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-06-04DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003281
Nadine Attal
{"title":"\"Belief-based\" medicine is not evidence-based medicine.","authors":"Nadine Attal","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003281","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11","pages":"2401-2402"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142505702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003302
Frank Lobbezoo, Karl G H Parisius, Merel C Verhoeff
Abstract: People with special needs, like those with Down syndrome, Parkinson disease, or dementia, frequently suffer from orofacial pain conditions and dysfunction of the masticatory system. However, the accurate assessment of orofacial pain and dysfunction in such individuals is challenging. In this review, the complexities of assessing and managing orofacial pain and dysfunction in special needs populations will be described, along with their comorbid orofacial conditions like impaired oral health, salivary problems, and movement disorders of the masticatory system. In addition, the importance of maintaining or restoring a good quality of life will be highlighted, while the urgent need for oral care as part of palliative care will be stressed as well. To accomplish all this, interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and dentists should be promoted in research, education, prevention, and care provision. Therefore, this review focuses specifically on this important topic.
{"title":"Orofacial pain and dysfunction in patients with special needs, with a focus on interdisciplinarity.","authors":"Frank Lobbezoo, Karl G H Parisius, Merel C Verhoeff","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003302","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>People with special needs, like those with Down syndrome, Parkinson disease, or dementia, frequently suffer from orofacial pain conditions and dysfunction of the masticatory system. However, the accurate assessment of orofacial pain and dysfunction in such individuals is challenging. In this review, the complexities of assessing and managing orofacial pain and dysfunction in special needs populations will be described, along with their comorbid orofacial conditions like impaired oral health, salivary problems, and movement disorders of the masticatory system. In addition, the importance of maintaining or restoring a good quality of life will be highlighted, while the urgent need for oral care as part of palliative care will be stressed as well. To accomplish all this, interdisciplinary collaboration between medical doctors and dentists should be promoted in research, education, prevention, and care provision. Therefore, this review focuses specifically on this important topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11S","pages":"S15-S22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003304
Katelynn E Boerner, Neil L Schechter, Tim F Oberlander
Abstract: For decades, clinicians and researchers have observed bidirectional relationships between child development and the pain experience in childhood. Pain in childhood is an inherently developmental phenomenon, embedded in an iterative, time-dependent process that reflects individual biological, behavioral, social, psychological, and environmental characteristics that unfold across the early life span. Childhood pain can have wide ranging effects on brain development in ways that contribute-for better and worse-to social, emotional, and cognitive well-being in childhood and on into adulthood. Atypical trajectories of development in the context of disorders such as autism, cerebral palsy, ADHD, and mood/anxiety disorders also contribute to unique childhood pain experiences. In this paper, pain will be considered as a determinant of development, and conversely development will be considered as a key determinant of a child's pain experience. We will discuss how intersectional identities (eg, gender, race, socioeconomic status) and associated social, structural, systemic, and physical environments influence the relationship between development and pain. Finally, we will identify what might be needed to think "developmentally" in ways that extend from the "bench side" in the lab to the "curb side" in the community, integrating a developmental perspective into research and clinical practice to achieve health accessibility and equity in pain care for all children across the developmental spectrum.
{"title":"Pain and development: interacting phenomena.","authors":"Katelynn E Boerner, Neil L Schechter, Tim F Oberlander","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003304","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>For decades, clinicians and researchers have observed bidirectional relationships between child development and the pain experience in childhood. Pain in childhood is an inherently developmental phenomenon, embedded in an iterative, time-dependent process that reflects individual biological, behavioral, social, psychological, and environmental characteristics that unfold across the early life span. Childhood pain can have wide ranging effects on brain development in ways that contribute-for better and worse-to social, emotional, and cognitive well-being in childhood and on into adulthood. Atypical trajectories of development in the context of disorders such as autism, cerebral palsy, ADHD, and mood/anxiety disorders also contribute to unique childhood pain experiences. In this paper, pain will be considered as a determinant of development, and conversely development will be considered as a key determinant of a child's pain experience. We will discuss how intersectional identities (eg, gender, race, socioeconomic status) and associated social, structural, systemic, and physical environments influence the relationship between development and pain. Finally, we will identify what might be needed to think \"developmentally\" in ways that extend from the \"bench side\" in the lab to the \"curb side\" in the community, integrating a developmental perspective into research and clinical practice to achieve health accessibility and equity in pain care for all children across the developmental spectrum.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11S","pages":"S82-S91"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract: Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in permanent neurological dysfunction and neuropathic pain. To address this pathology, we recently conducted a clinical study in which we transplanted neural precursor cells (NPCs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells into patients during the subacute phase of SCI. One of the therapeutic mechanisms of cell transplantation is the formation of synaptic connections with the host's neural tissues, which we demonstrated using a chemogenetic tool. In addition, we have developed innovative strategies to enhance the effectiveness of cell transplantation through gene therapy. Moreover, our current study is focused on developing cell therapy for chronic SCI, a more challenging pathology characterized by the formation of cavities and scar tissue. In such situations, transplanting NPCs with neurogenic properties could effectively penetrate scar tissue and form functional synapses with the host neurons. To improve the outcomes of cell transplantation alone, we have found that incorporating rehabilitation is beneficial. In animal models of SCI, we have established an effective rehabilitative training program in which NPCs were transplanted during the chronic phase. Robotic rehabilitation has demonstrated improvements in gait ability and trunk function in clinical situations. Therefore, regenerative medicine shows promise for chronic SCI, particularly when rehabilitation strategies are incorporated.
{"title":"Regenerative medicine for spinal cord injury using induced pluripotent stem cells: from animals to humans.","authors":"Narihito Nagoshi, Shogo Hashimoto, Hideyuki Okano, Masaya Nakamura","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003306","DOIUrl":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in permanent neurological dysfunction and neuropathic pain. To address this pathology, we recently conducted a clinical study in which we transplanted neural precursor cells (NPCs) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells into patients during the subacute phase of SCI. One of the therapeutic mechanisms of cell transplantation is the formation of synaptic connections with the host's neural tissues, which we demonstrated using a chemogenetic tool. In addition, we have developed innovative strategies to enhance the effectiveness of cell transplantation through gene therapy. Moreover, our current study is focused on developing cell therapy for chronic SCI, a more challenging pathology characterized by the formation of cavities and scar tissue. In such situations, transplanting NPCs with neurogenic properties could effectively penetrate scar tissue and form functional synapses with the host neurons. To improve the outcomes of cell transplantation alone, we have found that incorporating rehabilitation is beneficial. In animal models of SCI, we have established an effective rehabilitative training program in which NPCs were transplanted during the chronic phase. Robotic rehabilitation has demonstrated improvements in gait ability and trunk function in clinical situations. Therefore, regenerative medicine shows promise for chronic SCI, particularly when rehabilitation strategies are incorporated.</p>","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":"165 11S","pages":"S76-S81"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}