Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical最新文献

英文中文

Walter Gulick’s Recovering Truths 沃尔特·古力克的《找回真相》

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc201945325

Kriszta Sajber

This well-organized collection offers a blueprint for tracing continuity in Polanyi’s lifelong intellectual output. Gulick’s Recovering Truths: A Comprehensive Anthology of Michael Polanyi’s Writings makes it possible for anyone interested in Polanyi’s writings to explore the overall philosophical stance from which Polanyi’s thought originates. In addition to key texts from Polanyi’s ouvre, the volume introduces the reader to the method by which Polanyi’s philosophy transcends disciplinary preoccupations and transforms the post-Cartesian intellectual terrain through the conceptual tools of a post-critical philosophy.

这本组织有序的作品集为探寻波兰尼一生的学术成果提供了一幅蓝图。古力克的《恢复真理:迈克尔·波兰尼作品综合选集》使任何对波兰尼作品感兴趣的人都有可能探索波兰尼思想起源的整体哲学立场。除了波兰尼作品的关键文本外，该卷还向读者介绍了波兰尼哲学超越学科关注的方法，并通过后批判哲学的概念工具转变了后笛卡尔的知识领域。

引用次数: 0

Michael Polanyi and the Society of Explorers 迈克尔·波兰尼和探险家协会

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc201945328

C. Cordner

For Polanyi, the Society of Explorers (SoE) describes the ideal form of a free society. He does not, however, provide us with a thick description of such a society. This essay attempts to do so by bringing together his later social and political thoughts with those set forth in his discussion of “Conviviality.”

对波兰尼来说，探险家协会(SoE)描述了自由社会的理想形式。然而，他并没有为我们提供这样一个社会的详尽描述。这篇文章试图通过将他后期的社会和政治思想与他在《欢宴》的讨论中所阐述的思想结合起来来做到这一点。

引用次数: 1

Michael Polanyi and Early Neoliberalism 波兰尼与早期新自由主义

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc201945327

Martin Beddeleem

Between the late 1930s and the 1950s, Michael Polanyi came in close contact with a diverse cast of intellectuals seeking a renewal of the liberal doctrine. The elaboration of this “neoliberalism” happened through a transnational collaboration between economists, philosophers, and social theorists, united in their rejection of central planning. Defining a common agenda for this “early neoliberalism” offered an opportunity to discard the old laissez-faire doctrine and restore a supervisory role of the state. Ultimately, post-war dissensions regarding the direction of these efforts led Polanyi away from the neoliberal core.

在20世纪30年代末至50年代之间，迈克尔·波兰尼与寻求自由主义复兴的形形色色的知识分子有过密切接触。这种“新自由主义”的阐述是通过经济学家、哲学家和社会理论家之间的跨国合作而产生的，他们联合起来反对中央计划。为这种“早期新自由主义”定义一个共同的议程，为抛弃旧的自由放任主义和恢复国家的监督作用提供了一个机会。最终，战后关于这些努力方向的分歧导致波兰尼离开了新自由主义的核心。

引用次数: 0

Covering the Recovering 覆盖恢复

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc201945326

W. Gulick

In this brief essay, I respond to three generous reviews of my annotated anthology of Michael Polanyi’s comprehensive thought. Where my meaning or Polanyi’s thought seems unclear or controversial, I offer my rationale for my usage or interpretations.

在这篇简短的文章中，我回应了对我的迈克尔·波兰尼综合思想的注释选集的三个慷慨的评论。在我的意思或波兰尼的思想似乎不清楚或有争议的地方，我提供了我的用法或解释的理由。

引用次数: 0

Engaging a Wider Audience: Reflections on Walter Gulick’s Recovering Truths 吸引更广泛的观众:对沃尔特·古力克的《恢复真相》的反思

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc201945324

E. Bernal

Michael Polanyi’s thought still has an “outsider” status, despite the efforts of The Polanyi Society and extensive publications by other scholars in various fields. Gulick attributes this limited familiarity to Polanyi’s complexity and atypical philosophical insights, his re-introduction of the personal in feats of knowing, and his call for significant intellectual reform. Gulick sets out to remedy the situation with his well written, comprehensive, and accessible anthology. Polanyi’s thought can be applied to many of today’s concerns, including human research, animal intelligence, ecoliterature, and socio-political problems. Gulick’s book is an excellent resource for introducing students and others to the relevance of Polanyi’s thought for today’s issues.

尽管波兰尼协会做出了努力，其他学者在各个领域发表了大量文章，但波兰尼的思想仍然具有“局外人”的地位。古力克将这种有限的熟悉归因于波兰尼的复杂性和非典型的哲学见解，他在认识的壮举中重新引入个人，以及他对重大知识改革的呼吁。古力克着手用他的文笔优美、内容全面、通俗易懂的选集来纠正这种情况。波兰尼的思想可以应用于今天的许多问题，包括人类研究、动物智力、生态文学和社会政治问题。古力克的书是向学生和其他人介绍波兰尼思想与当今问题的相关性的绝佳资源。

引用次数: 0

Toward a Post-critical Literary Theory 走向后批评文学理论

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc20194512

J. Bocharova

This essay examines Meaning as Polanyi’s statement on aesthetics. The core of his aesthetic theory emphasizes the power of art to move the imagination. I examine metaphors he uses for this kind of movement—descent along a gradient, indwelling, and transcendence—and suggest implications for literary study. When Charles Taylor spoke to the Polanyi Society in 2015, Stanley Scott made the following observation during the Q and A session: “Polanyi’s idea of a tacit dimension strikes philosophy as a great revelation, and yet it’s sort of old news to poets, writers of scripture, prophets, who tend to speak not in what we today call the language of philosophy and science but in metaphor” (Lowney 2017, 45). He then suggested that understanding the tacit dimension “could be the very lynchpin of recognizing the point at which poetry, philosophy, and science connect” (Lowney 2017, 45). Scott’s comments struck me at the time as articulating something I had felt to be profound about Meaning. What follows is an extended response to Scott’s above observations. As I see it, in connecting poetry, science, myth, and politics, the “old news” faintly echoed in Meaning is that art adorns human life by figuring forth, drawing out, effecting potentialities of individuals and societies. In this way, Polanyi’s thought represents a bridge between earlier conceptions of poetry and new forays into cognitive features of literary experience. At a time when some literary critics are endeavoring to articulate a post-critical literary theory that would counterbalance critique, Polanyi’s views offer a way forward. Perhaps this is because Polanyi’s theory of aesthetics in Meaning—as Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 5 compiled and aided by Harry Prosch—is not an isolated inquiry relevant only to those of us interested in art; rather, it extends his theory of personal knowing by examining more closely what we mean when we talk about “reality” and by more deeply engaging with the problem of arbitrating between idioms of belief as we seek to distinguish between the real and the illusory. Polanyi’s contribution to the study of art in general and literature in particular is not simply that he offers additional commentary about aesthetic experience or our perception of the beautiful, but that he rehabilitates the notion that art and aesthetic experience helps us to make contact with reality. In other words, he shows us how aesthetic experience and aesthetic value cannot be separated from a tendency of the universe to evoke meaning from us. The Problem of “Aesthetics” One feature of Polanyian aesthetics in Meaning that stands out is its rejection of the common assumption that “aesthetic” is synonymous with “beautiful.” In the chapter on validity in art, he explains that the “cornerstone” of his aesthetic theory is not a beauty that merely pleases but “imaginative experience,” which we might say is a beauty that moves: Aesthetics h

本文考察波兰尼对美学的表述——意义。他的美学理论的核心是强调艺术调动想象力的力量。我研究了他对这种运动所使用的隐喻——沿着梯度下降、内在和超越——并提出了文学研究的启示。2015年，当查尔斯·泰勒在波兰尼学会发表演讲时，斯坦利·斯科特在问答环节中发表了以下评论:“波兰尼关于隐性维度的观点对哲学来说是一个伟大的启示，但对于诗人、圣经作家、先知来说，这是一种旧新闻，他们倾向于用我们今天所说的哲学和科学语言，而不是隐喻”(Lowney 2017,45)。然后他提出，理解隐性维度“可能是认识诗歌、哲学和科学连接点的关键”(Lowney 2017,45)。斯科特的评论当时打动了我，因为它表达了我对意义的深刻理解。以下是对斯科特上述观点的延伸回应。在我看来，在将诗歌、科学、神话和政治联系起来的过程中，《意义》中隐约回荡着这样一个“旧消息”:艺术通过揭示、挖掘和影响个人和社会的潜力来装饰人类生活。这样，波兰尼的思想在早期的诗歌概念和对文学经验认知特征的新探索之间架起了一座桥梁。当一些文学评论家正努力阐明一种后批评文学理论来制衡批评的时候，波兰尼的观点提供了一条前进的道路。也许这是因为波兰尼的意义美学理论——作为传统与发现:波兰尼学会杂志45:1©2019，由波兰尼学会编辑和帮助，Harry prosch——并不是一个孤立的研究，只与我们这些对艺术感兴趣的人有关;相反，它扩展了他的个人认知理论，更深入地考察了我们在谈论“现实”时的含义，并更深入地探讨了在我们试图区分真实与虚幻时，如何在信仰习语之间进行仲裁的问题。波兰尼对艺术和文学研究的贡献不仅仅在于他对审美经验或我们对美的感知提供了额外的评论，还在于他恢复了艺术和审美经验帮助我们与现实接触的观念。换句话说，他向我们展示了审美经验和审美价值是如何不能与宇宙从我们身上唤起意义的趋势分开的。波兰美学在意义上的一个突出特点是它拒绝了“美学”与“美”同义的普遍假设。在“艺术的有效性”一章中，他解释说，他的美学理论的“基石”不是仅仅令人愉悦的美，而是“富有想象力的体验”，我们可以说这是一种动人的美:美学在艺术中讲述了和谐与美，让我们感到愉悦。但其他的美也能取悦我们。科学理论的智慧之美是令人愉悦的，日落或女人的美也是如此;今天，“美”这个词被非常随意地用来赞美一项巧妙的发明，国际象棋中的优雅组合，或者体育运动中的最高壮举。但这些美很难打动我们的想象力，除非是在个人或专业的特殊兴趣方面。对于艺术来说，这种美实在是太和谐了，因为艺术的自我主张依赖于用想象的力量把不相容的元素连接起来。经历美学体验的乐趣不仅仅是感知和谐事物的快乐，而是将不相容的事物形成连贯的快乐:“在美学上感动一个人就是在想象力上感动他，使他产生这样的融合”(106)。在这里，令人愉悦的美和富有想象力的融合之间的区别很重要。它将我们的审美取向从研究美——如果我们所说的“美”指的是能唤起某种特殊愉悦感觉的东西——转变为研究能激发我们想象力的东西。这使他对美学的重新关注，以及最近从对艺术的形式、感性特征的分析到其在更大的社会政治条件下的嵌入性的范围扩大。对于文学研究来说，这种美学观点的含义是——呼应“诗人一直都知道的”——文学有能力使我们走向(或远离)真理。这不是，

{"title":"Toward a Post-critical Literary Theory","authors":"J. Bocharova","doi":"10.5840/traddisc20194512","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc20194512","url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines Meaning as Polanyi’s statement on aesthetics. The core of his aesthetic theory emphasizes the power of art to move the imagination. I examine metaphors he uses for this kind of movement—descent along a gradient, indwelling, and transcendence—and suggest implications for literary study. When Charles Taylor spoke to the Polanyi Society in 2015, Stanley Scott made the following observation during the Q and A session: “Polanyi’s idea of a tacit dimension strikes philosophy as a great revelation, and yet it’s sort of old news to poets, writers of scripture, prophets, who tend to speak not in what we today call the language of philosophy and science but in metaphor” (Lowney 2017, 45). He then suggested that understanding the tacit dimension “could be the very lynchpin of recognizing the point at which poetry, philosophy, and science connect” (Lowney 2017, 45). Scott’s comments struck me at the time as articulating something I had felt to be profound about Meaning. What follows is an extended response to Scott’s above observations. As I see it, in connecting poetry, science, myth, and politics, the “old news” faintly echoed in Meaning is that art adorns human life by figuring forth, drawing out, effecting potentialities of individuals and societies. In this way, Polanyi’s thought represents a bridge between earlier conceptions of poetry and new forays into cognitive features of literary experience. At a time when some literary critics are endeavoring to articulate a post-critical literary theory that would counterbalance critique, Polanyi’s views offer a way forward. Perhaps this is because Polanyi’s theory of aesthetics in Meaning—as Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 5 compiled and aided by Harry Prosch—is not an isolated inquiry relevant only to those of us interested in art; rather, it extends his theory of personal knowing by examining more closely what we mean when we talk about “reality” and by more deeply engaging with the problem of arbitrating between idioms of belief as we seek to distinguish between the real and the illusory. Polanyi’s contribution to the study of art in general and literature in particular is not simply that he offers additional commentary about aesthetic experience or our perception of the beautiful, but that he rehabilitates the notion that art and aesthetic experience helps us to make contact with reality. In other words, he shows us how aesthetic experience and aesthetic value cannot be separated from a tendency of the universe to evoke meaning from us. The Problem of “Aesthetics” One feature of Polanyian aesthetics in Meaning that stands out is its rejection of the common assumption that “aesthetic” is synonymous with “beautiful.” In the chapter on validity in art, he explains that the “cornerstone” of his aesthetic theory is not a beauty that merely pleases but “imaginative experience,” which we might say is a beauty that moves: Aesthetics h","PeriodicalId":199228,"journal":{"name":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115718677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Author and Reader 作者与读者

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc20194515

J. Fennell

In An Experiment in Criticism, C.S. Lewis demonstrates why, within traditional academic circles, he is best known and most respected for his accomplishments in regard to the study of English literature. Lewis’s important monograph aims to illuminate a new direction in literary criticism, and succeeds marvelously. Interestingly, Lewis’s analysis is paralleled at every turn by Polanyian insights. We have therefore yet a further instance of the intersection of the thought of these two men, and we again wonder at the absence during their lives of recognition of one another. What follows is a fragment of a much larger study that, circumstances permitting, might have been executed under the heading of “The Tacit Dynamics of Lewis’s An Experiment in Criticism.” The present essay will confine itself to examination of one from a long list of pregnant themes that arise from a Polanyian encounter with Lewis’s important monograph, namely, the manner in which Michael Polanyi’s notions of “sense-giving” and “sense-reading” usefully illuminate both the concept of “good reading” that stands at the heart of Lewis’s book and the practice of literary criticism itself. We will begin by explaining what Lewis intends by “good reading.” Following that, we will review Polanyi’s sense-giving and sense-reading before, finally, indicating the role Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 43 they may play in comprehending reading and criticism alike. In the process many of the themes of the now-dormant larger study will naturally appear.

在《批评的实验》一书中，C.S.刘易斯论证了为什么在传统学术圈中，他在英国文学研究方面的成就最为人所知，也最受人尊敬。刘易斯的重要专著旨在阐明文学批评的新方向，并取得了惊人的成功。有趣的是，刘易斯的分析处处与波兰学派的见解相吻合。因此，我们有了这两个人思想交集的又一个例子，我们又一次对他们一生中彼此不认识感到奇怪。下面是一个更大的研究的片段，如果情况允许，可以在“刘易斯的批评实验的隐性动力”的标题下进行。本文将局限于从波兰人与刘易斯重要专著的接触中产生的一长串重要主题中考察一个主题，即迈克尔·波兰尼的“给予意义”和“意义阅读”的概念如何有效地阐明了刘易斯书中核心的“良好阅读”概念和文学批评本身的实践。我们将首先解释刘易斯所说的“好的阅读”是什么意思。接下来，我们将回顾波兰尼的感官赋予和感官阅读，最后指出波兰尼学会43的传统与发现:波兰尼学会杂志45:1©2019他们在理解阅读和批评方面可能发挥的作用。在这个过程中，目前处于休眠状态的大型研究的许多主题将自然出现。

{"title":"Author and Reader","authors":"J. Fennell","doi":"10.5840/traddisc20194515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc20194515","url":null,"abstract":"In An Experiment in Criticism, C.S. Lewis demonstrates why, within traditional academic circles, he is best known and most respected for his accomplishments in regard to the study of English literature. Lewis’s important monograph aims to illuminate a new direction in literary criticism, and succeeds marvelously. Interestingly, Lewis’s analysis is paralleled at every turn by Polanyian insights. We have therefore yet a further instance of the intersection of the thought of these two men, and we again wonder at the absence during their lives of recognition of one another. What follows is a fragment of a much larger study that, circumstances permitting, might have been executed under the heading of “The Tacit Dynamics of Lewis’s An Experiment in Criticism.” The present essay will confine itself to examination of one from a long list of pregnant themes that arise from a Polanyian encounter with Lewis’s important monograph, namely, the manner in which Michael Polanyi’s notions of “sense-giving” and “sense-reading” usefully illuminate both the concept of “good reading” that stands at the heart of Lewis’s book and the practice of literary criticism itself. We will begin by explaining what Lewis intends by “good reading.” Following that, we will review Polanyi’s sense-giving and sense-reading before, finally, indicating the role Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 43 they may play in comprehending reading and criticism alike. In the process many of the themes of the now-dormant larger study will naturally appear.","PeriodicalId":199228,"journal":{"name":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122994777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Interview with Gábor István Bíró

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc20194516

Phil Mullins

引用次数: 0

The Limits of Critique 批判的局限

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.5840/traddisc20194517

Lindsay Atnip

引用次数: 0

Indwelling and Breaking Out 潜伏和爆发

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

Pub Date : 2019-01-30 DOI: 10.5840/TRADDISC20194513

S. Scott

引用次数: 0

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀