首页 > 最新文献

Pain management最新文献

英文 中文
Recovery indicators from the perspective of patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. 慢性腰痛患者康复指标的横断面调查
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2552631
Razieh Javadian Kootenayi, Razieh Mofateh, Maryam Seyedtabib

Aims: In low back pain (LBP) research, recovery is commonly used as an outcome measure. However, there is no method used to measure recovery or acceptable definition for recovery. This research aims to investigate patients' perceptions of recovery from LBP.

Materials & methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in which 350 patients with chronic LBP participated. Demographic and clinical information was collected by a comprehensive and inclusive questionnaire. A checklist of improvement indicators was given to the patients and completed by them. It was aimed to identify the most important criteria for recovery in patients with chronic LBP.

Results: The results showed that pain reduction alone is not a reliable indicator of recovery. The patients' view about the recovery from chronic LBP includes a wide range of factors in different areas of symptomatic improvement, fear of recurrence injury, functional disability, fatigue and reduced energy level. Also, a significant correlation was observed between recovery indicators and pain duration, body mass index, and pain intensity in patients with chronic LBP.

Conclusions: The framework of recovery for patients with chronic LBP is complicated and is a highly individual structure. It is determined by the impact of symptoms on activities of daily living factors.

目的:在腰痛(LBP)研究中,恢复通常被用作结果测量。然而,没有衡量恢复的方法,也没有可接受的恢复定义。本研究旨在探讨患者对腰痛恢复的看法。材料与方法:对350例慢性腰痛患者进行横断面调查。人口统计和临床信息是通过一个全面和包容的问卷收集的。给患者一份改善指标清单,由患者填写。目的是确定慢性腰痛患者恢复的最重要标准。结果:结果表明,疼痛减轻不是恢复的可靠指标。患者对慢性腰痛康复的看法包括不同领域的症状改善、对复发损伤的恐惧、功能残疾、疲劳和能量水平下降等因素。此外,慢性腰痛患者的恢复指标与疼痛持续时间、体重指数和疼痛强度之间存在显著相关性。结论:慢性腰痛患者的康复框架是复杂的,具有高度的个体化结构。它是由症状对日常生活活动的影响因素决定的。
{"title":"Recovery indicators from the perspective of patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Razieh Javadian Kootenayi, Razieh Mofateh, Maryam Seyedtabib","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2552631","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2552631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In low back pain (LBP) research, recovery is commonly used as an outcome measure. However, there is no method used to measure recovery or acceptable definition for recovery. This research aims to investigate patients' perceptions of recovery from LBP.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in which 350 patients with chronic LBP participated. Demographic and clinical information was collected by a comprehensive and inclusive questionnaire. A checklist of improvement indicators was given to the patients and completed by them. It was aimed to identify the most important criteria for recovery in patients with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that pain reduction alone is not a reliable indicator of recovery. The patients' view about the recovery from chronic LBP includes a wide range of factors in different areas of symptomatic improvement, fear of recurrence injury, functional disability, fatigue and reduced energy level. Also, a significant correlation was observed between recovery indicators and pain duration, body mass index, and pain intensity in patients with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The framework of recovery for patients with chronic LBP is complicated and is a highly individual structure. It is determined by the impact of symptoms on activities of daily living factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"835-843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144964671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of preoperative quadratus lumborum block on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. 术前腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜子宫切除术后阿片类药物消耗的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2556648
Kathryn Edmonds, Kiley Hunkler, Christopher Creedon, Sara Drayer, Scott Endicott, Kathryn Eliasen, Candice Jones-Cox

Background: Gynecologic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been developed to reduce postoperative narcotic use through multimodal pain management. While incisional injection of local anesthetic is standard practice, regional nerve blockades using liposomal agents are emerging as a promising adjunct technique for post-laparoscopy pain. Current data are conflicting regarding the benefits of regional nerve blocks on postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Objectives: To determine the impact of preoperative quadratus lumborum (QL) block on postoperative pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy. Our primary outcomes will be intraoperative and immediate postoperative opioid use (within 24 hours). Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, functional impact of pain, and postoperative complications.

Study design: This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial comparing opioid use in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy who receive a preoperative QL block to local injection. Seventy-six patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy will be randomized to the study arm, preoperative QL block with liposomal bupivacaine and intraoperative placebo incisional injection of 0.9% saline, or the control arm, preoperative sham QL block with 0.9% saline and intraoperative incisional injection of 0.25% bupivacaine. Outcomes will be measured at several timepoints: intraoperative, postoperative prior to discharge, and 1, 3, 5, 14 days, and 4-6 weeks postoperatively.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06709716.

背景:妇科手术后增强恢复(ERAS)途径通过多模式疼痛管理来减少术后麻醉品的使用。虽然切口注射局麻药是标准做法,但使用脂质体药物进行局部神经阻滞正在成为一种有前途的腹腔镜术后疼痛辅助技术。关于局部神经阻滞对腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛的益处,目前的数据存在矛盾。目的:探讨术前腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜子宫切除术后疼痛的影响。我们的主要结果将是术中和术后立即使用阿片类药物(24小时内)。次要结局包括疼痛评分、疼痛对功能的影响和术后并发症。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验,比较行腹腔镜子宫切除术的妇女术前接受QL阻滞和局部注射阿片类药物的使用。76名接受腹腔镜或机器人子宫切除术的患者将被随机分配到研究组,术前使用布比卡因脂质体进行QL阻断,术中切口注射0.9%生理盐水安慰剂,或对照组,术前使用0.9%生理盐水进行假QL阻断,术中切口注射0.25%布比卡因。将在几个时间点测量结果:术中、术后出院前以及术后1、3、5、14天和4-6周。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06709716。
{"title":"Impact of preoperative quadratus lumborum block on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Kathryn Edmonds, Kiley Hunkler, Christopher Creedon, Sara Drayer, Scott Endicott, Kathryn Eliasen, Candice Jones-Cox","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2556648","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2556648","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gynecologic enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been developed to reduce postoperative narcotic use through multimodal pain management. While incisional injection of local anesthetic is standard practice, regional nerve blockades using liposomal agents are emerging as a promising adjunct technique for post-laparoscopy pain. Current data are conflicting regarding the benefits of regional nerve blocks on postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of preoperative quadratus lumborum (QL) block on postoperative pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy. Our primary outcomes will be intraoperative and immediate postoperative opioid use (within 24 hours). Secondary outcomes will include pain scores, functional impact of pain, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized-controlled trial comparing opioid use in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy who receive a preoperative QL block to local injection. Seventy-six patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy will be randomized to the study arm, preoperative QL block with liposomal bupivacaine and intraoperative placebo incisional injection of 0.9% saline, or the control arm, preoperative sham QL block with 0.9% saline and intraoperative incisional injection of 0.25% bupivacaine. Outcomes will be measured at several timepoints: intraoperative, postoperative prior to discharge, and 1, 3, 5, 14 days, and 4-6 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT06709716.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"783-790"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12584603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145023945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Celiac plexus block and neurolysis procedure: treatment of chronic pain in pancreatic cancer. 腹腔神经丛阻滞和神经松解术:治疗胰腺癌慢性疼痛。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2555163
Colin Key Chen, Michael Anthony Erdek
{"title":"Celiac plexus block and neurolysis procedure: treatment of chronic pain in pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Colin Key Chen, Michael Anthony Erdek","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2555163","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2555163","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"779-781"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562717/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Botulinum toxin injection of the piriformis muscle for refractory pudendal neuralgia after decompression surgery: case report. 梨状肌注射肉毒杆菌毒素治疗顽固性阴部神经痛减压术1例。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-09 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2555162
Tomás Caroço, Renaud Bollens, Diogo Portugal

Pudendal neuropathy is a cause of pelvic pain, specifically pudendal neuralgia. The pudendal nerve is related to sensory, motor, and autonomic functions. We present the case of a 41-year-old man who suffered from chronic pelvic pain. In detail, the patient described stinging burning pain in the glans penis, proctalgia, lower urinary tract symptoms, sensation of "muscle tension" and squeezing pain. He was diagnosed with prostatitis and, following, pudendal neuralgia. Our patient was treated with antibiotics and analgesics, without improvement of symptoms. He was then submitted to decompression surgery of the pudendal nerve, with partial improvement. The patient started a rehabilitation program and was treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injections into the piriformis muscle with benefit. BoNT-A positive effects on pain relief may corroborate piriformis muscle compression of the pudendal nerve. BoNT-A may also reduce the release of neurotransmitters from the pain pathways. Early identification of pudendal neuralgia could have prevented the progression to chronic pain. There is still not an established role for BoNT-A in post-operative pudendal nerve decompression patients. Our case corroborates that more studies should be performed to explore BoNT-A administration in these patients.

阴部神经病变是骨盆疼痛的一个原因,特别是阴部神经痛。阴部神经与感觉、运动和自主神经功能有关。我们提出的情况下,41岁的男子谁遭受慢性盆腔疼痛。患者详细描述了龟头刺痛、阴茎灼痛、直痛、下尿路症状、“肌肉紧张”感和挤压痛。他被诊断为前列腺炎,接着是阴部神经痛。我们的病人接受了抗生素和止痛药治疗,症状没有改善。他随后接受了阴部神经减压手术,部分改善。患者开始了康复计划,并向梨状肌注射了肉毒杆菌毒素(BoNT-A),效果良好。BoNT-A对疼痛缓解的积极作用可能证实了梨状肌压迫阴部神经。BoNT-A也可能减少疼痛通路中神经递质的释放。阴部神经痛的早期识别可以防止发展为慢性疼痛。BoNT-A在手术后阴部神经减压患者中的作用尚未确定。我们的病例证实,应该进行更多的研究来探索BoNT-A在这些患者中的应用。
{"title":"Botulinum toxin injection of the piriformis muscle for refractory pudendal neuralgia after decompression surgery: case report.","authors":"Tomás Caroço, Renaud Bollens, Diogo Portugal","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2555162","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2555162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pudendal neuropathy is a cause of pelvic pain, specifically pudendal neuralgia. The pudendal nerve is related to sensory, motor, and autonomic functions. We present the case of a 41-year-old man who suffered from chronic pelvic pain. In detail, the patient described stinging burning pain in the glans penis, proctalgia, lower urinary tract symptoms, sensation of \"muscle tension\" and squeezing pain. He was diagnosed with prostatitis and, following, pudendal neuralgia. Our patient was treated with antibiotics and analgesics, without improvement of symptoms. He was then submitted to decompression surgery of the pudendal nerve, with partial improvement. The patient started a rehabilitation program and was treated with OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injections into the piriformis muscle with benefit. BoNT-A positive effects on pain relief may corroborate piriformis muscle compression of the pudendal nerve. BoNT-A may also reduce the release of neurotransmitters from the pain pathways. Early identification of pudendal neuralgia could have prevented the progression to chronic pain. There is still not an established role for BoNT-A in post-operative pudendal nerve decompression patients. Our case corroborates that more studies should be performed to explore BoNT-A administration in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"801-806"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562810/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145024003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fremanezumab for the treatment of migraine. Fremanezumab用于治疗偏头痛。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2550923
Dimos Mitsikostas, Srdjan Ljubisavljevic

Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the CGRP signaling leading to migraine prophylaxis. Its efficacy and potential safety concerns are updated here. All available data on fremanezumab were searched in PubMed with emphasis on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, tolerability, and safety. There is class I evidence for the efficacy of fremanezumab in the prophylaxis of both EM and CM, by reducing 1 to 2 monthly migraine days over placebo, but in real-world studies the magnitude of efficacy was greater. Though the size of efficacy looks like that of some repurposed anti-migraine treatments, its excellent tolerably highly improves the likelihood to help versus harm outcome over all traditional medications. Fremanezumab works in people with migraine and medication overuse, in people with previous treatment failures, as well as in people with concomitant depression, improving both migraine and depression measures. The latest data, along with the recent approval for use in children and adolescents, are unique among all migraine treatments. Alone or in combination with botulinumtoxin A may improve resistance to migraine. Mild reactions at the injection site are the most common side effects. Thus, fremanezumab represents an optimal treatment for people with migraine and should be considered as first-line choice.

Fremanezumab是一种单克隆抗体,可抑制导致偏头痛预防的CGRP信号。它的功效和潜在的安全问题在这里更新。在PubMed中检索了fremanezumab的所有可用数据,重点是作用机制、疗效、耐受性和安全性。有一级证据表明fremanezumab在EM和CM预防方面的有效性,通过比安慰剂减少1至2个月的偏头痛天数,但在现实世界的研究中,疗效的幅度更大。虽然疗效的大小看起来像一些重新定位的抗偏头痛治疗,但其优异的耐受性大大提高了所有传统药物的有益与有害结果的可能性。Fremanezumab适用于偏头痛和药物滥用患者、既往治疗失败的患者以及伴有抑郁症的患者,可改善偏头痛和抑郁症的治疗措施。最新的数据,以及最近批准用于儿童和青少年,在所有偏头痛治疗中都是独一无二的。单独使用或与肉毒杆菌毒素A联合使用可以提高对偏头痛的抵抗力。注射部位的轻微反应是最常见的副作用。因此,fremanezumab代表了偏头痛患者的最佳治疗方法,应被视为一线选择。
{"title":"Fremanezumab for the treatment of migraine.","authors":"Dimos Mitsikostas, Srdjan Ljubisavljevic","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2550923","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2550923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the CGRP signaling leading to migraine prophylaxis. Its efficacy and potential safety concerns are updated here. All available data on fremanezumab were searched in PubMed with emphasis on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, tolerability, and safety. There is class I evidence for the efficacy of fremanezumab in the prophylaxis of both EM and CM, by reducing 1 to 2 monthly migraine days over placebo, but in real-world studies the magnitude of efficacy was greater. Though the size of efficacy looks like that of some repurposed anti-migraine treatments, its excellent tolerably highly improves the likelihood to help versus harm outcome over all traditional medications. Fremanezumab works in people with migraine and medication overuse, in people with previous treatment failures, as well as in people with concomitant depression, improving both migraine and depression measures. The latest data, along with the recent approval for use in children and adolescents, are unique among all migraine treatments. Alone or in combination with botulinumtoxin A may improve resistance to migraine. Mild reactions at the injection site are the most common side effects. Thus, fremanezumab represents an optimal treatment for people with migraine and should be considered as first-line choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"791-800"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562785/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144964673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pain-relieving effect of dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis: a pilot crossover study. 动态矫形器治疗外侧上髁炎的镇痛效果:一项交叉试验研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-18 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2561396
Kazuhiro Ikeda, Akira Ikumi, Shinzo Onishi, Takeshi Ogawa, Sho Kohyama, Yuichi Yoshii

Aim: We developed a simple dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis (DOLE) assisting wrist extensors. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of DOLE and the counterforce brace in patients with lateral epicondylitis during pickup motion.

Patients & methods: Eighteen patients with lateral epicondylitis performed a pickup test using a 1 kg sandbag under three conditions: without a brace, with a counterforce brace, and with DOLE. Pain during the task was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The pain-relieving effect was calculated as the percentage reduction in VAS compared to baseline (without an orthosis).

Results: The VAS in the pickup test was 63.2±18.8 mm without orthosis, 53.9±21.0 mm with the counterforce brace, and 38.9±17.0 mm with DOLE. The pain-relieving effect was 0.11 (0-0.20) for the counterforce brace and 0.38 (0.24-0.52) for DOLE, which was greater in DOLE than in the counterforce brace (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: DOLE significantly reduced lateral elbow pain during pickup motion, outperforming the counterforce brace; however, given the relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation in larger longitudinal studies. Its simple, worker-friendly design and strong pain-relief effect suggest its potential utility in treating lateral epicondylitis.

目的:我们开发了一种简单的动态矫形器,用于辅助手腕伸肌治疗外侧上髁炎。本研究旨在比较DOLE和反力支具对外上髁炎患者提取运动时的疼痛缓解效果。患者和方法:18例外上髁炎患者在无支具、有反力支具和DOLE三种情况下,使用1 kg沙袋进行了拾取试验。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估任务期间的疼痛。疼痛缓解效果以VAS与基线(无矫形器)相比减少的百分比计算。结果:无矫形器时VAS为63.2±18.8 mm,有反力支时VAS为53.9±21.0 mm,有DOLE时VAS为38.9±17.0 mm。反力支具的镇痛效果为0.11 (0 ~ 0.20),DOLE组的镇痛效果为0.38(0.24 ~ 0.52),其中DOLE组优于反力支具(p = 0.001)。结论:DOLE明显减轻了取物运动时肘部外侧疼痛,优于反力支具;然而,由于样本量相对较小,这些发现应被解释为需要在更大规模的纵向研究中得到证实的初步证据。其简单,易于操作的设计和强烈的镇痛效果表明其在治疗外侧上髁炎的潜在用途。
{"title":"Pain-relieving effect of dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis: a pilot crossover study.","authors":"Kazuhiro Ikeda, Akira Ikumi, Shinzo Onishi, Takeshi Ogawa, Sho Kohyama, Yuichi Yoshii","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2561396","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2561396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We developed a simple dynamic orthosis for lateral epicondylitis (DOLE) assisting wrist extensors. This study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effects of DOLE and the counterforce brace in patients with lateral epicondylitis during pickup motion.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>Eighteen patients with lateral epicondylitis performed a pickup test using a 1 kg sandbag under three conditions: without a brace, with a counterforce brace, and with DOLE. Pain during the task was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The pain-relieving effect was calculated as the percentage reduction in VAS compared to baseline (without an orthosis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS in the pickup test was 63.2±18.8 mm without orthosis, 53.9±21.0 mm with the counterforce brace, and 38.9±17.0 mm with DOLE. The pain-relieving effect was 0.11 (0-0.20) for the counterforce brace and 0.38 (0.24-0.52) for DOLE, which was greater in DOLE than in the counterforce brace (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOLE significantly reduced lateral elbow pain during pickup motion, outperforming the counterforce brace; however, given the relatively small sample size, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation in larger longitudinal studies. Its simple, worker-friendly design and strong pain-relief effect suggest its potential utility in treating lateral epicondylitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"819-826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12562740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing headache management: Integrating primary care and patient-centered approaches. 优化头痛管理:整合初级保健和以患者为中心的方法。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2577627
Bhuvan Kc, Christina Malini Christopher
{"title":"Optimizing headache management: Integrating primary care and patient-centered approaches.","authors":"Bhuvan Kc, Christina Malini Christopher","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2577627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2577627","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145346454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postoperative pain outcome following a superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in children undergoing pediatric heart surgery: a retrospective cohort study. 儿童心脏手术后浅胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞后的疼痛结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2539667
Judith Stauff, Sebastian Kintrup, Markus Ramm, Andreas Brünen, Simone Ulrich, Edward Malec, Katarzyna Januszewska, Julia Stegger, Kerstin Trociewicz, Antje Gottschalk, Alexander Schnabel

Background: Aim of the present study was to investigate the postoperative pain outcome following the implementation of a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block in children undergoing cardiac surgery with a sternotomy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in children undergoing extracardiac Fontan operation or a secundum atrial septal defect closure receiving a SPIP in addition to standard pain treatment versus standard pain treatment only. The primary outcome was the worst pain intensity within 24 hours (median (interquartile range)).

Results: Mean age of the study groups (54 patients each) was 3.22 years (±0.95), respectively 4.26 years (±2.76) in the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in worst pain intensity 24 hours after surgery in children treated with a SPIP block (3(1-5)) compared to control group (4(2-5)) (p1-tailed = 0.16, d = 0.19). However, 4 and 12 hours after surgery there were significant improvements in median pain intensity in children treated with a SPIP block (p1-tailed = 0.04).

Conclusions: This study showed that implementation of a SPIP block might further improve postoperative pain management following cardiac surgery in children. However, due to lower baseline pain intensity in the control group primary outcome failed significantly. Therefore, further trials are urgently requested.

背景:本研究的目的是调查儿童胸骨切开心脏手术后实施浅胸骨旁肋间平面(SPIP)阻滞后的疼痛结果。方法:我们对接受心外Fontan手术或二次房间隔缺损闭合的儿童进行了回顾性队列研究,并在标准疼痛治疗的基础上进行了SPIP治疗,与仅进行标准疼痛治疗的儿童进行了对比。主要结局是24小时内最严重的疼痛强度(中位数(四分位数范围))。结果:各研究组54例,平均年龄3.22岁(±0.95),对照组平均年龄4.26岁(±2.76)。与对照组(4(2-5))相比,接受SPIP阻滞治疗的儿童术后24小时最严重疼痛强度(3(1-5))无统计学意义(p -尾= 0.16,d = 0.19)。然而,术后4和12小时,接受SPIP阻滞治疗的儿童中位疼痛强度有显著改善(p -尾值= 0.04)。结论:本研究表明,SPIP阻滞的实施可能进一步改善儿童心脏手术后的疼痛管理。然而,由于对照组的基线疼痛强度较低,主要结局明显失败。因此,迫切需要进一步的试验。
{"title":"Postoperative pain outcome following a superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in children undergoing pediatric heart surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Judith Stauff, Sebastian Kintrup, Markus Ramm, Andreas Brünen, Simone Ulrich, Edward Malec, Katarzyna Januszewska, Julia Stegger, Kerstin Trociewicz, Antje Gottschalk, Alexander Schnabel","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2539667","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2539667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aim of the present study was to investigate the postoperative pain outcome following the implementation of a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (SPIP) block in children undergoing cardiac surgery with a sternotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study in children undergoing extracardiac Fontan operation or a secundum atrial septal defect closure receiving a SPIP in addition to standard pain treatment versus standard pain treatment only. The primary outcome was the worst pain intensity within 24 hours (median (interquartile range)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the study groups (54 patients each) was 3.22 years (±0.95), respectively 4.26 years (±2.76) in the control group. There was no statistically significant reduction in worst pain intensity 24 hours after surgery in children treated with a SPIP block (3(1-5)) compared to control group (4(2-5)) (p1-tailed = 0.16, d = 0.19). However, 4 and 12 hours after surgery there were significant improvements in median pain intensity in children treated with a SPIP block (p1-tailed = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that implementation of a SPIP block might further improve postoperative pain management following cardiac surgery in children. However, due to lower baseline pain intensity in the control group primary outcome failed significantly. Therefore, further trials are urgently requested.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"685-691"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12691543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144732730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and adverse effects of lower doses of ketorolac; a systematic review and meta-analysis. 低剂量酮咯酸的疗效及不良反应系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2560293
Maryam Bahreini, Heewa Rashnavandi, Fatemeh Rasooli, Alireza Jalali, Rasoul Masoumi, Hadi Mirfazaelian

Introduction: Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is proposed to have a ceiling effect. We studied if ketorolac at lower doses was as effective and safe as the standard doses.

Area covered: Randomized trials on different doses of ketorolac were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from the inception date to 12 December 2024. The extent of change in pain, pain relief, need for rescue analgesia, reduction in patient opioid consumption, and adverse event rates were outcomes of interest. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.

Expert opinion/commentary: In acute, postoperative, and cancer pain, there was no difference in the analgesic effect of lower doses of ketorolac in comparison to routine doses. In addition, the results did not show higher adverse effects.

Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023480153.

酮咯酸是一种非甾体抗炎药,被认为有上限效应。我们研究了低剂量的酮咯酸是否和标准剂量一样有效和安全。涵盖领域:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science中从开始日期到2024年12月12日的不同剂量酮罗拉酸的随机试验。疼痛变化的程度、疼痛缓解、需要抢救性镇痛、减少患者阿片类药物的消耗和不良事件发生率是我们感兴趣的结果。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具第2版评估偏倚风险。专家意见/评论:在急性、术后和癌性疼痛中,与常规剂量相比,低剂量酮罗拉酸的镇痛效果没有差异。此外,结果没有显示出更高的不良反应。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD42023480153。
{"title":"Efficacy and adverse effects of lower doses of ketorolac; a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maryam Bahreini, Heewa Rashnavandi, Fatemeh Rasooli, Alireza Jalali, Rasoul Masoumi, Hadi Mirfazaelian","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2560293","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2560293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, is proposed to have a ceiling effect. We studied if ketorolac at lower doses was as effective and safe as the standard doses.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>Randomized trials on different doses of ketorolac were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from the inception date to 12 December 2024. The extent of change in pain, pain relief, need for rescue analgesia, reduction in patient opioid consumption, and adverse event rates were outcomes of interest. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion/commentary: </strong>In acute, postoperative, and cancer pain, there was no difference in the analgesic effect of lower doses of ketorolac in comparison to routine doses. In addition, the results did not show higher adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023480153.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"733-744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12691576/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145075870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
GLP-1 agonists: a game changer in pain treatment and addiction. GLP-1激动剂:疼痛治疗和成瘾的游戏规则改变者。
IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-28 DOI: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2536998
Sahil Bade, Mark Friedrich B Hurdle, Sohail Bade, Sebastian Encalada, Sharima Kanahan-Osman, Sahil Gupta

Chronic pain imposes a significant healthcare burden, with treatments often limited by side effects, opioid dependency, and preventable surgeries. Emerging evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), developed for diabetes and obesity, may offer novel analgesia and treat drug-seeking behavior. This review examines the role of GLP-1RAs in pain management, focusing on inflammation, macrophage repolarization, oxidative stress, and dopaminergic pathways in substance use disorders. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase (Ovid) from January 2000 to February 2025, identifying studies on GLP-1RA and pain in headaches, osteoarthritis, diabetic neuropathy, and substance use disorders. GLP-1RAs offer a promising shift in pain management, potentially reducing opioid dependence, preventing surgical interventions, and lowering healthcare costs. While early evidence suggests analgesic and disease-modifying effects beyond weight loss, significant knowledge gaps remain. In osteoarthritis, they appear to reduce inflammation and cartilage degradation, but trials in non-obese, non-comorbid patients are needed. In diabetic neuropathy, GLP-1RAs show potential for nerve repair, but optimal dosing and long-term efficacy need clarification. Preclinical data support GLP-1RAs signaling in migraines, but human studies are lacking. Trials in alcohol addiction show promise, though evidence for other substances remains inconclusive. Larger-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.

慢性疼痛带来了巨大的医疗负担,治疗往往受到副作用、阿片类药物依赖和可预防手术的限制。新的证据表明,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs),开发用于糖尿病和肥胖,可能提供新的镇痛和治疗药物寻求行为。这篇综述探讨了GLP-1RAs在疼痛管理中的作用,重点关注炎症、巨噬细胞复极化、氧化应激和物质使用障碍中的多巴胺能通路。从2000年1月到2025年2月,我们在PubMed和Embase (Ovid)上进行了文献检索,确定了GLP-1RA和头痛、骨关节炎、糖尿病神经病变和物质使用障碍疼痛的研究。GLP-1RAs为疼痛管理提供了有希望的转变,可能减少阿片类药物依赖,防止手术干预,降低医疗成本。虽然早期的证据表明止痛和改善疾病的作用超出了减肥,但重大的知识差距仍然存在。在骨关节炎中,它们似乎可以减少炎症和软骨退化,但需要在非肥胖、无合并症的患者中进行试验。在糖尿病神经病变中,GLP-1RAs显示出神经修复的潜力,但最佳剂量和长期疗效需要澄清。临床前数据支持GLP-1RAs信号在偏头痛中的作用,但缺乏人体研究。酒精成瘾的试验显示出了希望,尽管其他物质的证据仍不确定。需要更大规模的试验来证实这些发现。
{"title":"GLP-1 agonists: a game changer in pain treatment and addiction.","authors":"Sahil Bade, Mark Friedrich B Hurdle, Sohail Bade, Sebastian Encalada, Sharima Kanahan-Osman, Sahil Gupta","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2536998","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2536998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain imposes a significant healthcare burden, with treatments often limited by side effects, opioid dependency, and preventable surgeries. Emerging evidence suggests that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), developed for diabetes and obesity, may offer novel analgesia and treat drug-seeking behavior. This review examines the role of GLP-1RAs in pain management, focusing on inflammation, macrophage repolarization, oxidative stress, and dopaminergic pathways in substance use disorders. We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase (Ovid) from January 2000 to February 2025, identifying studies on GLP-1RA and pain in headaches, osteoarthritis, diabetic neuropathy, and substance use disorders. GLP-1RAs offer a promising shift in pain management, potentially reducing opioid dependence, preventing surgical interventions, and lowering healthcare costs. While early evidence suggests analgesic and disease-modifying effects beyond weight loss, significant knowledge gaps remain. In osteoarthritis, they appear to reduce inflammation and cartilage degradation, but trials in non-obese, non-comorbid patients are needed. In diabetic neuropathy, GLP-1RAs show potential for nerve repair, but optimal dosing and long-term efficacy need clarification. Preclinical data support GLP-1RAs signaling in migraines, but human studies are lacking. Trials in alcohol addiction show promise, though evidence for other substances remains inconclusive. Larger-scale trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"753-765"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12691565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144732729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pain management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1