Pharmacogenomics最新文献

Aim: To assess patient perspectives following evaluation in a multidisciplinary pharmacogenomics clinic run by a clinical pharmacist, genetic counselor, and physician.

Methods: A survey was distributed to 187 adults seen in the Brigham and Women's Hospital Pharmacogenomics Clinic. Participants who completed the survey were invited to complete a semi-structured interview. Interview subjects were selected based on order of responses, scheduling availability, and range of participant experiences with testing and the clinic process. Surveys were analyzed with descriptive statistics, and interview transcripts were analyzed with thematic analysis.

Results: Forty-two survey responses were received; 13 participants were interviewed. Quantitative data demonstrated high satisfaction with the multidisciplinary clinic model and belief that pharmacogenomic testing has value. Qualitative analysis identified four themes: 1) Self-Advocacy as a Patient Responsibility in the Utilization of Pharmacogenomic Results, 2) High Satisfaction with Multidisciplinary Pharmacogenomics Clinic Model and Team, 3) Utility of Pharmacogenomics, and 4) Desire for Pharmacogenomics Resources.

Conclusion: Patients value the care provided by a multidisciplinary pharmacogenomics clinic team, but they need to advocate for the use of their results with other healthcare professionals.

Receptor tyrosine kinase pathways are frequently deregulated in cancer. Inhibiting these pathways with small molecule inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies has become a crucial addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in oncology. Since the introduction of drugs that target receptor tyrosine kinase pathways, it has become evident that not all patients respond to treatment. Therefore, biomarkers to predict response and benefit of drugs targeting tyrosine kinases have been sought. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), one of the four receptors of the EGFR family were among the first targeted therapies used in solid tumors. Two drugs of this class, cetuximab and panitumumab, have been used in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer initially without any biomarker requirement. Soon, it became clear that responses were mostly observed in patients without mutations in KRAS oncogene. Currently, additional mutations of the pathway, including non-exon 2 mutations in KRAS, mutations in the homologous GTPase NRAS, in kinase BRAF and PIK3CA and other pathway proteins, have been added in the evaluation for responsiveness prediction to cetuximab and panitumumab. In this review, the predictive biomarker landscape for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancers with no extended RAS and BRAF mutations will be examined.

Aim: To systematically assess clinical studies involving patients undergoing drug therapy, comparing different genotypes to assess the relationship with changes in QT intervals, with no limitations on study design, setting, population, dosing regimens, or duration.

Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and a pre-registered protocol. Clinical human studies on PGx markers of diQTP were identified, assessed using standardized tools, and categorized by design. Gene associations were classified as pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic. Identified genes underwent pathway enrichment analyses. Drugs were classified by third-level Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes. Descriptive statistics were computed by study category and drug classes.

Results: Of 4,493 reports, 84 studies were included, identifying 213 unique variants across 42 drug classes, of which 10% were replicated. KCNE1-Asp85Asn was the most consistent variant. Most findings (82%) were derived from candidate gene studies, suggesting bias toward known markers. The diQTP-associated genes were mainly linked to "cardiac conduction" and "muscle contraction" pathways (false discovery rate = 4.71 × 10^-14). We also found an overlap between diQTP-associated genes and congenital long QT syndrome genes.

Conclusion: Key genes, drugs, and pathways were identified, but few consistent PGx markers emerged. Extensive, unbiased studies with diverse populations are crucial to advancing the field.

Registration: A protocol was pre-registered at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42022296097.

Data deposition: Data sets generated by this review are available at figshare: DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.27959616.

Introduction: Genetic variants can impact medication response. The study of genetic variants on medications is called pharmacogenomics (PGx). Understanding PGx results can be difficult as results are reported differently than other laboratory tests. Patients have reported a lack of understanding and satisfaction with PGx information.

Methods: Surveys were emailed to patients seen in the PGx clinic and patients who participated in an elective screening (Sanford Chip) at Sanford Health. Surveys were conducted to assess literacy, understanding and satisfaction of PGx testing. Survey responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: There were 121 responses that were initially collected. A total of 100 responses were included in the analysis. The median response amongst all individuals was 9 out of a possible 13 points on the PGx literacy assessment. PGx clinic patients had increased satisfaction compared to Sanford Chip patients for being able to understand results (p < 0.05), that PGx test provided information to improve my care plan (p < 0.05), that they feel confident that my medication will be effective for me based on my genetics (p < 0.05), were satisfied with communication of results (p < 0.001) and overall experience (p < 0.01).

Discussion: Implementation of a PGx clinic improves patient experience, confidence, and satisfaction.

Objective: We aimed to identify the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism testing on clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. CYP2C19 polymorphisms were identified based on the presence of two normal functional alleles in normal metabolizers (NMs), a normal functional allele and a nonfunctional allele in intermediate metabolizers and two nonfunctional alleles in poor metabolizers. Patients were recommended for the CYP2C19 polymorphism testing followed by the change in dual antithrombotic drugs (DAPT) at the discretion of the supervising physician. The primary clinical endpoint was stent thrombosis (ST). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relative risk of clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 273 patients were included. The relative risk of ST was not reduced in patients who underwent CYP2C19 polymorphism testing than in patients without this test (3.1% vs. 3.9%, OR = 0.914, 95% CI = 0.218-3.841). The ST in NMs and non-NMs was 3.4% and 2.9%, respectively, and showing no reduction in NMs (OR = 1.145, 95% CI = 0.162-8.105). Changing DAPT did not reduce the relative risk of ST compared with non-changing (2.3% vs. 3.2%, OR = 1.604, 95% CI = 0.024-107.033).

Conclusions: CYP2C19 polymorphism was not related to stent thrombosis in patients with CAS.

Aim: To explore the effect of CYP2D6*10 (100C > T) and ADRB1 1165 G > C polymorphisms on heart rate of post-PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) patients treated with metoprolol succinate sustained-release tablets. Methods: A total of 756 inpatients with metoprolol succinate sustained-release tablets were selected and the genotypes of CYP2D6*10 and ADRB1 1165G > C were detected in 319 patients using gene chip detection. The target heart rate was defined as a resting heart rate < 70 beats/min. Clinical data were collected. Results: A total of 319 inpatients were enrolled in the study. The mutant allele frequencies of CYP2D6 and ADRB1 were 57.21 and 69.44%, respectively. Whatever the dose of metoprolol, the heart rates were lower in patients with homozygous mutation of CYP2D6 than those with heterozygous mutation and wild-type (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, this effect was not seen between different genotypes of ADRB1. Logistic regression analysis showed that the dose of metoprolol and the genotypes of CYP2D6 were predictors of heart rate <70 beats/min in these patients. Further multivariate analysis indicated that patients with homozygous mutation had better control of heart rates compared with those with wild-type and heterozygous mutation of CYP2D6*10 genotypes (all: p < 0.001). Conclusion:CYP2D6*10 polymorphisms were associated with the heart rate of post-PCI patients treated with metoprolol succinate sustained-release tablets.

This study shows that the distribution of CYP3A5 alleles (*1, *3, *6 and *7) and genotype-predicted CYP3A5 phenotypes vary significantly across Latin American cohorts (Brazilians and the One Thousand Genomes Admixed American superpopulation), as well as among subcohorts comprising individuals with the highest proportions of Native, European or sub-Saharan African ancestry. Differences in biogeographical ancestry across the study groups are the likely explanation for these results. The differential distribution of CYP3A5 phenotypes has major pharmacogenomic implications, affecting the proportion of individuals carrying high risk CYP3A5 phenotypes for the immunosuppressant tacrolimus and the number of patients that would need to be genotyped to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients under tacrolimus treatment.

Objective: This work was designed to describe the knowledge and perceptions of pharmacogenomics (PGx) among pharmacists in the Canadian province of Manitoba. Methods: A 40-item, web-based survey was distributed to pharmacists in Manitoba. Results: Of 74 participants, one third had some education or training in PGx, and 12.2% had used PGx test results in their practice. Participants' self-rated knowledge of PGx testing and common PGx resources (e.g., Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) was low. Most pharmacists surveyed believe that PGx can improve medication efficacy (82.4%) or prevent adverse drug reactions (81.1%). Most (91%) desired more education on PGx. Conclusion: Manitoba pharmacists reported positive perceptions toward PGx. However, they are currently underprepared to implement PGx into practice.

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) is widely used in clinical settings; however, the exploration of its use in pharmacogenomic analysis remains limited. Our study compared the variant callings for 28 core absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination genes by WES and array-based technology using clinical trials samples. The results revealed that WES had a positive predictive value of 0.71-0.92 and a sensitivity of single-nucleotide variants between 0.68 and 0.95, compared with array-based technology, for the variants in the commonly targeted regions of the WES and PhamacoScan™ assay. Besides the common variants detected by both assays, WES identified 200-300 exclusive variants per sample, totalling 55 annotated exclusive variants, including important modulators of metabolism such as rs2032582 (ABCB1) and rs72547527 (SULT1A1). This study highlights the potential clinical advantages of using WES to identify a wider range of genetic variations and enabling precision medicine.

Aim: The study aim was to determine caregiver interest and planned utilization of pharmacogenomic (PGx) results for their child with Prader-Willi syndrome. Methods: Caregivers consented to PGx testing for their child and completed a survey before receiving results. Results: Of all caregivers (n = 48), 93.8% were highly interested in their child's upcoming PGx results. Most (97.9%) planned to share results with their child's medical providers. However, only 47.9% of caregivers were confident providers would utilize the PGx results. Conclusion: Caregivers are interested in utilizing PGx but are uncertain providers will use these results in their child's care. More information about provider comfort with PGx utilization is needed to understand how PGx education would benefit providers and ultimately patients with PGx results.