Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068441
Jonathan S Litt, Henning Tiemeier
{"title":"Outcomes 50 Years After Preterm Birth: A Golden Opportunity to Reflect on Pathways Toward Thriving.","authors":"Jonathan S Litt, Henning Tiemeier","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068441","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-068441","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142829735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-066929
Anthony G B Walters, Greg D Gamble, Caroline A Crowther, Stuart R Dalziel, Carl L Eagleton, Christopher J D McKinlay, Barry J Milne, Jane E Harding
Background and objectives: Preterm birth results in neonatal and childhood morbidity and mortality. Additionally, population-based studies show poorer cardiovascular health in adult survivors, but a full range of health outcomes has not been investigated into midlife. We aimed to assess the health outcomes after preterm vs term birth at 50 years in survivors of a randomized trial of antenatal betamethasone.
Methods: Participants were asked to complete a health questionnaire and for consent to access administrative data. Participants deceased prior to follow-up were assessed with administrative data alone. The primary outcome was a composite: any of diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, treated hypertension, treated dyslipidemia, or a previous major adverse cardiovascular event. Secondary outcomes included respiratory, mental health, educational, and other health outcomes.
Results: We included 470 participants: 424 assessed at mean age 49.3 years and 46 who died after infancy. The primary outcome occurred in 34.5% (112/325) of those born preterm and 29.9% (43/144) of those born at term; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.14 (95% CI, 0.85-1.54; P = .37). Cardiovascular events were less common in those born preterm (9/326 [2.8%] vs 10/144 [6.9%]; aRR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.14-0.79), while self-reported hypertension was more common (101/291 [34.7%] vs 23/116 [19.8%]; aRR 1.74, 95% CI, 1.16-2.61), although treated hypertension was not statistically significantly different (66/323 [20.4%] vs 22/143 [15.4%]; aRR 1.32, 95% CI, 0.84-2.06). Other components of the composite endpoint were similar between those born preterm and at term.
Conclusions: Those aged 50 years born preterm were more likely to have hypertension but had similar risk of diabetes, prediabetes, and dyslipidemia than those born at term, and their risk of cardiovascular events was lower.
{"title":"Health Outcomes 50 Years After Preterm Birth in Participants of a Trial of Antenatal Betamethasone.","authors":"Anthony G B Walters, Greg D Gamble, Caroline A Crowther, Stuart R Dalziel, Carl L Eagleton, Christopher J D McKinlay, Barry J Milne, Jane E Harding","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-066929","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-066929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Preterm birth results in neonatal and childhood morbidity and mortality. Additionally, population-based studies show poorer cardiovascular health in adult survivors, but a full range of health outcomes has not been investigated into midlife. We aimed to assess the health outcomes after preterm vs term birth at 50 years in survivors of a randomized trial of antenatal betamethasone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were asked to complete a health questionnaire and for consent to access administrative data. Participants deceased prior to follow-up were assessed with administrative data alone. The primary outcome was a composite: any of diabetes mellitus, prediabetes, treated hypertension, treated dyslipidemia, or a previous major adverse cardiovascular event. Secondary outcomes included respiratory, mental health, educational, and other health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 470 participants: 424 assessed at mean age 49.3 years and 46 who died after infancy. The primary outcome occurred in 34.5% (112/325) of those born preterm and 29.9% (43/144) of those born at term; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.14 (95% CI, 0.85-1.54; P = .37). Cardiovascular events were less common in those born preterm (9/326 [2.8%] vs 10/144 [6.9%]; aRR 0.33, 95% CI, 0.14-0.79), while self-reported hypertension was more common (101/291 [34.7%] vs 23/116 [19.8%]; aRR 1.74, 95% CI, 1.16-2.61), although treated hypertension was not statistically significantly different (66/323 [20.4%] vs 22/143 [15.4%]; aRR 1.32, 95% CI, 0.84-2.06). Other components of the composite endpoint were similar between those born preterm and at term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Those aged 50 years born preterm were more likely to have hypertension but had similar risk of diabetes, prediabetes, and dyslipidemia than those born at term, and their risk of cardiovascular events was lower.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142829730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-069667
Matthew E Oster, Nelangi M Pinto, Arun K Pramanik, Allison Markowsky, Bryanna N Schwartz, Alex R Kemper, Lisa A Hom, Gerard R Martin
Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011 and adopted by all US states and territories by 2018. In addition to reviewing key developments in CCHD screening since the initial American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) endorsement in 2011, this clinical report provides 3 updated recommendations. First, a new AAP algorithm has been endorsed for use in CCHD screening. Compared with the original AAP algorithm from 2011, this new algorithm a) has a passing oxygen saturation threshold of ≥95% in both pre- and post-ductal measurements; and b) has only 1 retest instead of 2 for infants who did not pass the first screen. Second, to continue to improve screening, state newborn screening programs should collect a recommended minimum uniform dataset to aid in surveillance and monitoring of the program. Finally, stakeholders should be educated on the limitations of screening, the significance of non-CCHD conditions, and the importance of protocol adherence. Future directions of CCHD screening include improving overall sensitivity and implementing methods to reduce health inequities. It will remain critical that the AAP and its chapters and members work with health departments and hospitals to achieve awareness and implementation of these recommendations.
{"title":"Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A New Algorithm and Other Updated Recommendations: Clinical Report.","authors":"Matthew E Oster, Nelangi M Pinto, Arun K Pramanik, Allison Markowsky, Bryanna N Schwartz, Alex R Kemper, Lisa A Hom, Gerard R Martin","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069667","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-069667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel in 2011 and adopted by all US states and territories by 2018. In addition to reviewing key developments in CCHD screening since the initial American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) endorsement in 2011, this clinical report provides 3 updated recommendations. First, a new AAP algorithm has been endorsed for use in CCHD screening. Compared with the original AAP algorithm from 2011, this new algorithm a) has a passing oxygen saturation threshold of ≥95% in both pre- and post-ductal measurements; and b) has only 1 retest instead of 2 for infants who did not pass the first screen. Second, to continue to improve screening, state newborn screening programs should collect a recommended minimum uniform dataset to aid in surveillance and monitoring of the program. Finally, stakeholders should be educated on the limitations of screening, the significance of non-CCHD conditions, and the importance of protocol adherence. Future directions of CCHD screening include improving overall sensitivity and implementing methods to reduce health inequities. It will remain critical that the AAP and its chapters and members work with health departments and hospitals to achieve awareness and implementation of these recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142829734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-069567
Lewis R First, Kate Larson, Joseph Puskarz, Alex R Kemper
{"title":"The More Things Change, One Thing Stays the Same.","authors":"Lewis R First, Kate Larson, Joseph Puskarz, Alex R Kemper","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069567","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-069567","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068489
Kavita Parikh, Maranda C Ward, Matt Hall, Sunitha V Kaiser, Joel S Tieder
{"title":"Analyzing Pediatric Safety Events Using Antiracist Principles.","authors":"Kavita Parikh, Maranda C Ward, Matt Hall, Sunitha V Kaiser, Joel S Tieder","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068489","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-068489","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-069175
Jace E Pooley
{"title":"Listen Up: Autistic Youth Need to Be Heard.","authors":"Jace E Pooley","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069175","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-069175","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068076
Jennifer A Hoffmann, Alba Pergjika, Kimberly Burkhart, Christopher Gable, Ashley A Foster, Mohsen Saidinejad, Trevor Covington, Desiree Edemba, Sara Mullins, Merritt Schreiber, Lee S Beers
Public health emergencies, including climate-related and manmade disasters such as active shooter incidents, occur regularly in the United States. A comprehensive approach is needed to ensure that children's mental health needs are adequately addressed following disasters. This article summarizes the latest evidence on how health systems can effectively address children's unique developmental, social, emotional, and behavioral needs in the context of disasters. To do so requires the integration of mental health considerations throughout all disaster phases, including preparedness, response, and recovery. We discuss the role of traditional emergency response systems and emerging models for responding to mental health crises. These include the national children's disaster mental health concept of operations and specific resources such as crisis lines, mobile crisis units, and telemental health. To achieve a broader reach in addressing children's mental health needs during disasters, health systems can foster a "pediatric disaster system of care" by partnering with community touch points such as schools, faith-based organizations, public health, and law enforcement. Unique considerations during disasters are required to maintain access to care for children with preexisting behavioral health conditions. During disasters, attention is needed to promote equitable identification of mental health needs and linkage to services, particularly for minoritized groups and children living in rural, frontier, and high-poverty areas. Strategies to address children's mental health needs during disasters include the provision of psychological first aid, screening for and triaging mental health needs, and stepped care approaches that progressively allocate higher-intensity evidence-based treatments to children with greater and enduring needs.
{"title":"Supporting Children's Mental Health Needs in Disasters.","authors":"Jennifer A Hoffmann, Alba Pergjika, Kimberly Burkhart, Christopher Gable, Ashley A Foster, Mohsen Saidinejad, Trevor Covington, Desiree Edemba, Sara Mullins, Merritt Schreiber, Lee S Beers","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-068076","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-068076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public health emergencies, including climate-related and manmade disasters such as active shooter incidents, occur regularly in the United States. A comprehensive approach is needed to ensure that children's mental health needs are adequately addressed following disasters. This article summarizes the latest evidence on how health systems can effectively address children's unique developmental, social, emotional, and behavioral needs in the context of disasters. To do so requires the integration of mental health considerations throughout all disaster phases, including preparedness, response, and recovery. We discuss the role of traditional emergency response systems and emerging models for responding to mental health crises. These include the national children's disaster mental health concept of operations and specific resources such as crisis lines, mobile crisis units, and telemental health. To achieve a broader reach in addressing children's mental health needs during disasters, health systems can foster a \"pediatric disaster system of care\" by partnering with community touch points such as schools, faith-based organizations, public health, and law enforcement. Unique considerations during disasters are required to maintain access to care for children with preexisting behavioral health conditions. During disasters, attention is needed to promote equitable identification of mental health needs and linkage to services, particularly for minoritized groups and children living in rural, frontier, and high-poverty areas. Strategies to address children's mental health needs during disasters include the provision of psychological first aid, screening for and triaging mental health needs, and stepped care approaches that progressively allocate higher-intensity evidence-based treatments to children with greater and enduring needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-067621
Morgan A Zalot, Margaret M Cortese, Kevin P O'Callaghan, Mary C Casey-Moore, Nathan L'Etoile, Sarah Leeann Smart, Michelle J Honeywood, Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Jacqueline E Tate, Anna Davis, Nicole Wittmeyer, Carolyn McGann, Salma Sadaf, Kadedra Wilson, Michael D Bowen, Rashi Gautam, Umesh D Parashar, Susan E Coffin, Kathleen A Gibbs
Background and objectives: Many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) do not give rotavirus vaccines to inpatients due to a theoretical risk of horizontal transmission of vaccine strains. We aimed to determine incidence and clinical significance of vaccine-strain transmission to unvaccinated infants in a NICU that routinely administers pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5).
Methods: This prospective cohort study included all patients admitted to a 100-bed NICU for 1 year. Stool specimens were collected weekly; real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to detect any RV5 strain. Incidence of transmission to unvaccinated infants was calculated assuming each unvaccinated patient's stool contributed 1 patient-day at risk for transmission. Investigations and geospatial analyses were conducted for suspected transmission events.
Results: Of 1238 infants admitted, 560 (45%) were premature and 322 (26%) had gastrointestinal pathology. During observation, 226 RV5 doses were administered. Overall, 3448 stool samples were tested, including 2252 from 686 unvaccinated patients. Most (681, 99.3%) unvaccinated patients never tested positive for RV5 strain. Five (<1%) tested RV5 strain positive. The estimated rate of transmission to unvaccinated infants was 5/2252 stools or 2.2/1000 patient-days at risk (95% CI: 0.7-5.2). No gastroenteritis symptoms were identified in transmission cases within 7 days of collection of RV5-positive stool. Of 126 patients for whom the RV5 series was initiated before the discharge date, 55% would have become age-ineligible to start the series if vaccination was allowed only at discharge.
Conclusions: Transmission of RV5 strain was infrequent and without clinical consequences. Benefits of allowing vaccine-induced protection against rotavirus disease in infants through in-NICU RV5 vaccination appear to have outweighed risks from vaccine-strain transmission.
{"title":"Risk of Transmission of Vaccine-Strain Rotavirus in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit That Routinely Vaccinates.","authors":"Morgan A Zalot, Margaret M Cortese, Kevin P O'Callaghan, Mary C Casey-Moore, Nathan L'Etoile, Sarah Leeann Smart, Michelle J Honeywood, Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Jacqueline E Tate, Anna Davis, Nicole Wittmeyer, Carolyn McGann, Salma Sadaf, Kadedra Wilson, Michael D Bowen, Rashi Gautam, Umesh D Parashar, Susan E Coffin, Kathleen A Gibbs","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-067621","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2024-067621","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) do not give rotavirus vaccines to inpatients due to a theoretical risk of horizontal transmission of vaccine strains. We aimed to determine incidence and clinical significance of vaccine-strain transmission to unvaccinated infants in a NICU that routinely administers pentavalent rotavirus vaccine (RV5).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included all patients admitted to a 100-bed NICU for 1 year. Stool specimens were collected weekly; real-time quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to detect any RV5 strain. Incidence of transmission to unvaccinated infants was calculated assuming each unvaccinated patient's stool contributed 1 patient-day at risk for transmission. Investigations and geospatial analyses were conducted for suspected transmission events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1238 infants admitted, 560 (45%) were premature and 322 (26%) had gastrointestinal pathology. During observation, 226 RV5 doses were administered. Overall, 3448 stool samples were tested, including 2252 from 686 unvaccinated patients. Most (681, 99.3%) unvaccinated patients never tested positive for RV5 strain. Five (<1%) tested RV5 strain positive. The estimated rate of transmission to unvaccinated infants was 5/2252 stools or 2.2/1000 patient-days at risk (95% CI: 0.7-5.2). No gastroenteritis symptoms were identified in transmission cases within 7 days of collection of RV5-positive stool. Of 126 patients for whom the RV5 series was initiated before the discharge date, 55% would have become age-ineligible to start the series if vaccination was allowed only at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transmission of RV5 strain was infrequent and without clinical consequences. Benefits of allowing vaccine-induced protection against rotavirus disease in infants through in-NICU RV5 vaccination appear to have outweighed risks from vaccine-strain transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-065427
Lena Oliveros, Hector Valdivia, Colin Crook, Lori Rutman, Surabhi Vora, Dwight Barry, Lauren Rakes
Background: Federal guidelines and equitable care mandate that patients who use a language other than English receive interpretation in their preferred language. Substantial variability exists in interpreter use in intensive care settings. We aimed to increase the rate of interpretations in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through a series of targeted interventions.
Methods: A multidisciplinary team developed a key driver diagram to identify areas for focused intervention. Each plan-do-study-act cycle informed the next cycle of interventions, targeting increasing interpreter (video, phone, and in-person) use. Interventions included standardizing technology, standardizing placement of interpretation devices in patient rooms, provider education, and creating accountability systems of interpreter use by care providers. We reviewed data from PICU encounters between January 2018 and January 2022 and used summary statistics and statistical process control methods to measure the impact of our interventions.
Results: We analyzed 882 patient encounters over the 4-year study period. Demographic characteristics were similar in the preintervention and postintervention periods. The total interpretation rate increased to 2.7 interpretations per patient per day from a baseline rate of 1.4. Each individual interpretation modality demonstrated increases in use. Average time spent interpreting via phone increased from 8 to 10.5 minutes per patient per day, and average time spent interpreting via video went from 9.5 to 22 minutes per patient per day.
Conclusions: Iterative quality improvement methodology effectively identified barriers to equitable care, guided development of focused interventions, and improved interpreter use among pediatric patients who were critically ill.
{"title":"Equity-Focused Interventions Improve Interpreter Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Lena Oliveros, Hector Valdivia, Colin Crook, Lori Rutman, Surabhi Vora, Dwight Barry, Lauren Rakes","doi":"10.1542/peds.2023-065427","DOIUrl":"10.1542/peds.2023-065427","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Federal guidelines and equitable care mandate that patients who use a language other than English receive interpretation in their preferred language. Substantial variability exists in interpreter use in intensive care settings. We aimed to increase the rate of interpretations in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through a series of targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team developed a key driver diagram to identify areas for focused intervention. Each plan-do-study-act cycle informed the next cycle of interventions, targeting increasing interpreter (video, phone, and in-person) use. Interventions included standardizing technology, standardizing placement of interpretation devices in patient rooms, provider education, and creating accountability systems of interpreter use by care providers. We reviewed data from PICU encounters between January 2018 and January 2022 and used summary statistics and statistical process control methods to measure the impact of our interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 882 patient encounters over the 4-year study period. Demographic characteristics were similar in the preintervention and postintervention periods. The total interpretation rate increased to 2.7 interpretations per patient per day from a baseline rate of 1.4. Each individual interpretation modality demonstrated increases in use. Average time spent interpreting via phone increased from 8 to 10.5 minutes per patient per day, and average time spent interpreting via video went from 9.5 to 22 minutes per patient per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iterative quality improvement methodology effectively identified barriers to equitable care, guided development of focused interventions, and improved interpreter use among pediatric patients who were critically ill.</p>","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}