PM&R最新文献

Background: Multimodal analgesia (MMA) combines opioids with nonopioid analgesics (NOAs) to mitigate opioid-related adverse events and development of opioid use disorders. Although MMA has become the standard for orthopedic perioperative pain management, guidance is less clear for the approximately 15% of patients who go on to require inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation (IOR) postoperatively. The IOR population tends to be older and frailer and hence likely more vulnerable to adverse events. Little research has been done to shed light on how NOAs are used in this population.

Objective: To characterize NOA prescribing in older versus younger adults during IOR admissions and to determine predictors of NOA prescribing in an older IOR population.

Design: Retrospective case-control study.

Setting: Two IOR wards at an academic rehabilitation hospital in Toronto, Canada.

Patients: All patients aged ≥50 years admitted for an orthopedic indication between November 2019 and June 2021; the patients aged <65 group was included for comparative characterization of NOA prescribing versus older peers.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Medication use and adverse events, pain, and rehabilitation outcomes such as the Functional Independence Measure, discharge destination, and length of stay.

Results: A total of 643 patient encounters were included; 48.2% used NOA. Age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99, p < .001) and prior NOA use (OR: 3.15; CI: 2.0-4.9, p < .001) were associated with NOA prescribing. Other positively associated factors included body mass index, psychiatric history, elective surgery, and admission from a specific referring hospital. Adverse events between NOA users and nonusers were similar.

Conclusions: NOA prescribing is heterogeneous and declines with age in IOR. This points to an opportunity to explore integrating NOA into opioid-sparing MMA protocols tailored to older IOR patients, along with further study of the safety and benefit of these regimens.

Objective: To examine the impact of telemedicine on demographic and practice patterns between outpatients receiving virtual versus in-person cancer rehabilitation physiatry care.

Design: Multicenter retrospective study.

Setting: Outpatient cancer rehabilitation physiatry clinics at four academic medical centers in the United States.

Patients: Patients with cancer diagnoses or history of cancer diagnosis.

Interventions: Cancer rehabilitation physiatry encounters.

Main outcome measures: Visit mode (in-person, telemedicine); disparities variables (age, race, and gender) by visit mode, and practice interventions (imaging, medications, procedures, other orders, and orders of any type) by visit mode.

Results: Among a total of 7004 encounters, 2687 unique patients were found. In-person participants were significantly older than the average telemedicine participant (mean 62.9 vs. 60.7 years; p < .001). A race effect was seen (p = .037) with individuals reporting as Asian or other being more likely to have telemedicine encounters. No gender disparities were seen. Using a random visit analysis model to compare populations receiving in-person versus telemedicine care, a slight majority (53%) of follow-up visits were via telemedicine, versus 40% of new patient visits (p < .001). No significant differences were seen in medication prescribing frequency (38.9% telemedicine vs. 36.7% in-person, adjusted relative risk [RR]: 0.988, confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-1.34; p = .988) or imaging frequency (2.4% telemedicine vs. 7.6%; adjusted RR: 0.784, CI: 0.44-1.39; p = .408) between telemedicine versus in-person visit types. Other orders were significantly less likely to be placed during telemedicine than in-person visits (19.9% telemedicine vs. 28.6% in-person; adjusted RR: 0.623, CI: 0.45-0.86, p = .004). Order(s) of any type were placed in 54% of visits (52% telemedicine vs. 56% in-person; adjusted RR: 0.92 for telemedicine, CI: 0.83-1.01, p = .082).

Conclusions: Telemedicine has been integrated into cancer rehabilitation physiatry practices and appears to be conducive for placing many types of orders, especially medications. Age was found to be the only major demographic difference between in-person and telehealth patients.

Background: Prescription medications are an essential element of military amputation care programs.

Objectives: To analyze (1) outpatient prescription medications following combat-related amputations, (2) longitudinal changes in prescription activity during the first year postinjury, and (3) patient characteristics associated with prescription medications.

Design: Retrospective study of military casualty records and outpatient prescription medications. Clinicians identified 13 medication categories based on American Hospital Formulary Service classifications.

Setting: Military amputation rehabilitation program.

Patients: 1651 service members who sustained major limb amputations during 2001-2017.

Main outcomes measures: Prescription medication category, days' supply, opioid dosage.

Results: During the first year postinjury, patients averaged 65 outpatient prescriptions (new or refills, SD = 43.3) and 8 (SD = 1.9) of 13 medication categories. Nearly all patients (99%) had opioid prescriptions averaging high dosages with variation by patient characteristics and postinjury time. At least 84% of patients had prescriptions for one or more central nervous system, gastrointestinal, psychotherapeutic, immune/anti-infective and/or nonopioid analgesic medications. Prescriptions declined from the first (92%) to fourth (73%) quarter postinjury. Many patients had prescription opioids (51%), central nervous system medications (43%), or psychotherapeutic medications (32%) during the fourth quarter. In regression models, multiple factors including White race/ethnicity (relative risk [RR] = 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.06-1.28], p = .001), injury severity, traumatic brain injury, upper limb amputation (RR = 0.90; CI: [0.83-0.99], p = .020), multiple amputation (RR = 1.12 CI: [1.03-1.22], p = .008), phantom limb syndrome, chronic pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder were significantly associated with prescriptions (p's < .05).

Conclusions: Amputation care providers manage a high volume and wide range of prescription medications including multiple central nervous system drugs. The results show significant variation in prescription practices by patient characteristics and time postinjury. These findings can help optimize the benefits and reduce the risks of prescription medications and indicate areas for future research.

Background: Postmenopausal bone loss and decreased physical performance are commonly presented issues. This study aimed through systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the benefits of adding exercise to medicine/supplements in postmenopausal women.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of four electronic databases for articles published from inception to December 2023. Clinical controlled trials comparing the effect of additional exercise and medicine/supplements alone in postmenopausal women were included. The outcomes studied were bone mineral density (BMD) and physical performance. The quality of evidence was evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results: Nineteen articles with 1249 participants were included in this study for systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that additional exercise was not associated with significantly improved BMD at the lumbar spine and hip joint compared with medicine/supplements only. However, results of subgroup analysis of exercise types showed a significant improvement in lumbar spine BMD by combining multiple types of exercise training (SMD = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.72; p = .04). Furthermore, additional exercise significantly improved lower extremity muscle strength (Standard Mean Difference [SMD] = 1.77; 95% CI = 0.56-2.98; p = .004), Berg's Balance Scale (SMD = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.12-1.32; p = .02), Timed Up and Go (SMD = -1.07; 95% CI = -1.35--0.78; p < .001), fear of falling (SMD = 1.32; 95% CI = 0.89-1.75; p < .001), and the quality of life (SMD = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.74-2.05; p < .001). The quality level of the evidence was between low to very low.

Conclusions: The significant value of the exercise was demonstrated through enhancing physical performance and quality of life. Moreover, combining various exercise training programs has shown a positive effect on BMD at the lumbar spine. Therefore, for postmenopausal women, combining exercise with medicine/supplements is recommended to further improve physical function and specific areas of BMD. (PROSPERO: CRD42023390633).

Aromatase inhibitors are prescribed in breast cancer due to their associated lower rate of cancer recurrence compared to tamoxifen. However, aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia (AIIA) is one of the leading causes of treatment nonadherence, increasing the risk of cancer recurrence. The pathophysiology of AIIA is poorly understood, and although current recommendations for AIIA include lifestyle changes and analgesics depending on the severity of symptoms, there is no established effective treatment. The aim of this study is to explore the presentation and mechanism of AIIA and investigate the feasibility and efficacy of different exercise interventions (aerobic, resistance, aerobic and resistance combined, and yoga or tai chi) in patients with AIIA to guide the development of formal exercise prescription guidelines. Findings indicate that a mixed-modality regimen of aerobic and resistance exercises is feasible and safe and may serve the most benefit in improving joint pain, functionality, and quality of life. More specifically, the weekly regimen should consist of 150 min of aerobic exercise with two sessions of at least six resistance exercises, 8 to 12 repetitions, three sets each. Supplementary yoga and tai chi may be recommended twice a week depending on a patient's target symptoms. Yoga was associated with improved physical functionality, whereas tai chi was related to improvements in mental health. However, the feasibility and impact of combined aerobic and resistance exercise protocols with yoga or tai chi in our target population were not investigated in this review. The use of large, randomized controlled trials is recommended for future studies.

Introduction: Although the female athlete triad (Triad) has been associated with increased risk of bone-stress injuries (BSIs), limited research among collegiate athletes has addressed the associations between the Triad and non-BSI injuries.

Objective: To elucidate the relationship between Triad and both BSI and non-BSI in female athletes.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Primary and tertiary care student athlete clinic.

Participants: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female athletes at a single institution.

Intervention: Participants completed a pre-participation questionnaire and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, which was used to generate a Triad cumulative risk assessment score (Triad score). The number of overuse musculoskeletal injuries that occurred while the athletes were still competing collegiately were identified through chart review.

Main outcome measure: BSI and non-BSI were treated as count variables. The association between BSI, non-BSI, and Triad score was measured using Poisson regression to calculate rate ratios.

Results: Of 239 athletes, 43% of athletes (n = 103) sustained at least one injury. Of those, 40% (n = 95) sustained at least one non-BSI and 10% (n = 24) sustained at least one BSI over an average follow-up 2.5 years. After accounting for sport type (non-lean, runner, other endurance sport, or other lean advantage sport) and baseline age, we found that every additional Triad score risk point was associated with a significant 17% increase in the rate of BSI (rate ratio [RR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33; p = .016). However, Triad score was unrelated to non-BSI (1.00, 95% CI 0.91-1.11; p = .99). Compared with athletes in non-lean sports (n = 108), athletes in other lean advantage sports (n = 30) had an increased rate of non-BSI (RR: 2.09, p = .004) whereas distance runners (n = 46) had increased rates of BSI (RR: 7.65, p < .001) and non-BSI (RR: 2.25, p < .001).

Conclusions: Higher Triad score is associated with an increased risk of BSI but not non-BSI in collegiate athletes.

Background: Low-value care is the use of substitutive/ineffective/harmful strategies based on available evidence, and it is considered one of the main contributors to the burden related to low back pain in health care systems. The use of routine imaging for patients with low back pain is the main example of inappropriate care. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of medical doctors and patients from Brazil about this practice may help propose strategies to reduce imaging rates.

Objective: To investigate the perceptions of medical doctors and patients about imaging for the diagnosis of nonspecific low back pain.

Design: A qualitative study using the framework analysis method.

Settings: Primary and secondary care.

Participants: Fifteen patients with low back pain and 15 doctors participated in this study.

Data collection: Sociodemographic data were collected from all participants, and the interviews were performed using a set of questions created based on the literature.

Main results: Patients and doctors believe that the main reason for ordering imaging tests is to identify the source of pain, and imaging could be useful for tracking disease progression over time or if there is a lack of improvement after treatment. Patients' expectations and pressures play a role in the decision to order imaging tests, but clinicians believe that education is the preferred strategy to reduce imaging rates.

Conclusion: Identifying the source of pain, tracking the disease progression, and patients' expectations and pressures were the main drivers of imaging requests for low back pain. Educational strategies were suggested to reduce the use of routine imaging.

Background: Although physical activity has been shown to have significant benefits for individuals living with cancer, engaging lung cancer survivors (LCS) in increasing routine physical activity participation has been particularly challenging.

Purpose: To describe enablers of, barriers to, and patterns of physical activity among LCS and to characterize interest in a physical activity program as a first step to improving physical activity engagement.

Methods: The study consisted of a cross-sectional survey (n = 100) of adult LCS recruited from a thoracic oncology clinic assessing multiple domains of physical activity (engagement, perceived barriers, benefits, physical function, psychosocial factors, self-efficacy, and programmatic preferences).

Results: Only 12% of LCS in our cohort (average age 67 years, 54% male, 81% with stage III or IV disease) met American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) physical activity guidelines. Participants engaged in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, with an average (SD) of 48.4 (91.8) minutes per week. The most commonly reported barriers to physical activity were fatigue (49%), dyspnea (39%), and difficulty with daily activities (34%). Regression analysis demonstrated a positive association between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and higher income (r = 0.241, p = .016), physical function (r = 0.281, p = .005), and physical activity self-efficacy (r = 0.270, p = .007). Qualitative results demonstrated a strong interest in physical activity programming that is lung-cancer specific with a high level of support and guidance.

Conclusion: This study identified that LCS had low levels of physical activity with fatigue, dyspnea, socioeconomic, and functional limitations contributing. The majority of LCS are interested in an exercise program and believe that exercise engagement will produce functional benefits. The present study presents a framework to guide development of community-based interventions to increase LCS physical activity participation among LCS.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and spinal cord injury (SCI) are diagnoses commonly encountered on the pediatric rehabilitation unit. However, there is limited evidence in the literature addressing the incidence of or rehabilitation outcomes in pediatric patients with a dual diagnosis of TBI and SCI.

Objective: To determine incidence and functional outcomes of the dual diagnosis population.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation unit within an academic pediatric hospital.

Patients: Pediatric patients admitted to a single inpatient rehabilitation unit with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI between 2006 and 2019. Fifty-four patient records were identified and 26 met inclusion criteria.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure: Presence of concomitant TBI in patients with diagnosed SCI.

Results: Seven of 26 patients were given a dual diagnosis of TBI and SCI during their initial rehabilitation hospitalization. After review of charts, authors identified 12 additional patients with suspected dual diagnoses based on injury characteristics and symptoms. There were no significant differences in functional outcomes across diagnosis groups.

Conclusions: Incidence of dual diagnosis among pediatric patients with traumatic SCI was initially found to be 27%; the retrospective review indicated that TBI may be underdiagnosed in this patient population, and the dual diagnosis incidence may be as high as 73%. All patients had improved functional outcomes during their rehabilitation stays regardless of presence or absence of TBI.