Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-03DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0238
Julianna Vecchio, Hao Wang, Bo Zhou, Usha Sambamoorthi
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded health care access in the United States. This study examines the long-term impact of the ACA on private health insurance enrollment using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. A repeated cross-sectional study using NHIS data from 2015 to 2022 was analyzed. Given the repeal of the ACA's individual mandate in 2019, stratified analyses compared Marketplace enrollment before (2015, 2018) and after (2019, 2022) the repeal. The study included US adults aged 26-64 years. Unadjusted enrollment rates were compared across age, sex, race/ethnicity, social determinants of health (SDOH), chronic conditions, body mass index, and smoking. Multivariable logistic regression assessed enrollment trends and associated factors. Marketplace enrollment increased by 1.4 percentage points post-mandate (P < 0.001), with no significant change pre-mandate (0.5-point decline, P = 0.235). Some subgroups (ages 26-39, Midwest, West) saw declines pre-mandate, while many experienced increased enrollments post-mandate. After adjustment, individuals in 2022 had 27% higher odds of enrollment than in 2019 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.43, P < 0.001), whereas no significant change occurred between 2015 and 2018 (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.89-1.16, P = 0.818). Age, racial minority status, and unfavorable SDOH were associated with higher post-mandate enrollment odds. Marketplace enrollment grew post-mandate, particularly among vulnerable populations. While the repeal of the individual mandate may have contributed, other policy changes-expanded enrollment windows, increased subsidies, enhanced outreach, and streamlined applications-likely played a role, particularly in response to COVID-19.
《平价医疗法案》(ACA)扩大了美国的医疗保健覆盖面。本研究使用全国健康访谈调查(NHIS)的数据来检验ACA对私人健康保险登记的长期影响。使用2015年至2022年的NHIS数据进行重复横断面研究。鉴于2019年废除《平价医疗法案》的个人授权,分层分析比较了废除之前(2015年、2018年)和之后(2019年、2022年)的市场登记情况。该研究包括26-64岁的美国成年人。未调整的入组率在年龄、性别、种族/民族、健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)、慢性病、体重指数和吸烟方面进行比较。多变量logistic回归评估了入学趋势和相关因素。强制执行后,市场登记人数增加了1.4个百分点(P < 0.001),强制执行前没有显著变化(下降0.5个百分点,P = 0.235)。一些亚群体(26-39岁,中西部,西部)的参保人数在强制执行前有所下降,而许多人在强制执行后参保人数有所增加。调整后,2022年的个体入组几率比2019年高27%(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 1.27, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.13-1.43, P < 0.001),而2015年至2018年无显著变化(aOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.89-1.16, P = 0.818)。年龄、少数种族和不利的SDOH与较高的授权后入组几率相关。强制执行后,市场登记人数有所增加,尤其是在弱势群体中。虽然个人强制医保的废除可能有所贡献,但其他政策变化——扩大登记窗口、增加补贴、加强外联和简化申请——可能也发挥了作用,特别是在应对COVID-19方面。
{"title":"The Long-Term Trend of the Affordable Care Act on Health Insurance Marketplace Enrollment.","authors":"Julianna Vecchio, Hao Wang, Bo Zhou, Usha Sambamoorthi","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0238","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded health care access in the United States. This study examines the long-term impact of the ACA on private health insurance enrollment using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. A repeated cross-sectional study using NHIS data from 2015 to 2022 was analyzed. Given the repeal of the ACA's individual mandate in 2019, stratified analyses compared Marketplace enrollment before (2015, 2018) and after (2019, 2022) the repeal. The study included US adults aged 26-64 years. Unadjusted enrollment rates were compared across age, sex, race/ethnicity, social determinants of health (SDOH), chronic conditions, body mass index, and smoking. Multivariable logistic regression assessed enrollment trends and associated factors. Marketplace enrollment increased by 1.4 percentage points post-mandate (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with no significant change pre-mandate (0.5-point decline, <i>P</i> = 0.235). Some subgroups (ages 26-39, Midwest, West) saw declines pre-mandate, while many experienced increased enrollments post-mandate. After adjustment, individuals in 2022 had 27% higher odds of enrollment than in 2019 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.43, <i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas no significant change occurred between 2015 and 2018 (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.89-1.16, <i>P</i> = 0.818). Age, racial minority status, and unfavorable SDOH were associated with higher post-mandate enrollment odds. Marketplace enrollment grew post-mandate, particularly among vulnerable populations. While the repeal of the individual mandate may have contributed, other policy changes-expanded enrollment windows, increased subsidies, enhanced outreach, and streamlined applications-likely played a role, particularly in response to COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"140-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-28DOI: 10.1089/pop.2025.0049
David B Nash
{"title":"Ringside Seat.","authors":"David B Nash","doi":"10.1089/pop.2025.0049","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2025.0049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"115-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-04-18DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0233
Melanie Chalfin, Scott Orlov, Sheraz Qamar, Amy Cunningham, Geoffrey Mills
Hypertension control remains challenging for many primary care patients. The goal of this study was to implement an evidence-based team approach to improve hypertension control, self-reported health distress, and self-efficacy in adult patients with hypertension at a large academic family medicine practice. The 5-year intervention included team-based medication therapy management, patient-centered behavioral counseling, and home blood pressure monitoring. Pre- and post-intervention blood pressure and patient surveys were analyzed using paired t-tests. The authors observed significant decreases in systolic blood pressure (148.4 vs. 135.6, P = 0.001) and self-reported health distress over the enrollment period in participants who completed the study. The multidisciplinary intervention was associated with reduced systolic blood pressure and health distress in patients who enrolled and completed the program. A multidisciplinary blood pressure monitoring program can be implemented by providers referring patients with uncontrolled hypertension after pharmacologic interventions.
{"title":"Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Hypertension Management Program at a Large Primary Care Practice.","authors":"Melanie Chalfin, Scott Orlov, Sheraz Qamar, Amy Cunningham, Geoffrey Mills","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0233","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension control remains challenging for many primary care patients. The goal of this study was to implement an evidence-based team approach to improve hypertension control, self-reported health distress, and self-efficacy in adult patients with hypertension at a large academic family medicine practice. The 5-year intervention included team-based medication therapy management, patient-centered behavioral counseling, and home blood pressure monitoring. Pre- and post-intervention blood pressure and patient surveys were analyzed using paired <i>t</i>-tests. The authors observed significant decreases in systolic blood pressure (148.4 vs. 135.6, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and self-reported health distress over the enrollment period in participants who completed the study. The multidisciplinary intervention was associated with reduced systolic blood pressure and health distress in patients who enrolled and completed the program. A multidisciplinary blood pressure monitoring program can be implemented by providers referring patients with uncontrolled hypertension after pharmacologic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144028391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-28DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0232
Inam Sakinah, Lena Bertozzi, Sney Patel, David Gurley, Eric Hilton, Deeksha Kola, Pooja K Mehta
Virtual urgent care (VUC) and emergency department at home (ED at home) are two emerging interventions that may help address avoidable health care costs driven by inadequate access to primary care. This study evaluates the integration of VUC and ED at home as a combined mobile integrated care program, into a value-based primary care model that serves Medicaid and dual-eligible populations. Use of embedded VUC and ED at home among individuals with claim-identified physical health needs was associated with a statistically significant 27% reduction in inpatient admissions (P = 0.05), a 61% reduction in readmission (P = 0.04), and a 240% increase in engagement with primary care and care coordination (P < 0.001). Use of these services was also associated with a total cost of care decrease of $550 per member per month (P = 0.07). Findings suggest that virtual and home-based acute care services may be a promising lever for value-based payment models to enhance engagement and realize goals of improved cost and outcomes among populations with complex medical and social needs.
{"title":"Additive Impact of Virtual Urgent and Emergency Department at Home Care on Value-Based Primary Care for Medicaid and Dual-Eligible Members.","authors":"Inam Sakinah, Lena Bertozzi, Sney Patel, David Gurley, Eric Hilton, Deeksha Kola, Pooja K Mehta","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0232","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Virtual urgent care (VUC) and emergency department at home (ED at home) are two emerging interventions that may help address avoidable health care costs driven by inadequate access to primary care. This study evaluates the integration of VUC and ED at home as a combined mobile integrated care program, into a value-based primary care model that serves Medicaid and dual-eligible populations. Use of embedded VUC and ED at home among individuals with claim-identified physical health needs was associated with a statistically significant 27% reduction in inpatient admissions (<i>P</i> = 0.05), a 61% reduction in readmission (<i>P</i> = 0.04), and a 240% increase in engagement with primary care and care coordination (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Use of these services was also associated with a total cost of care decrease of $550 per member per month (<i>P</i> = 0.07). Findings suggest that virtual and home-based acute care services may be a promising lever for value-based payment models to enhance engagement and realize goals of improved cost and outcomes among populations with complex medical and social needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0135
Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed
The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.
目的是比较接受远程医疗(TH)作为面对面护理(F2F)辅助的老年糖尿病患者与仅接受面对面护理(F2F)的老年人的临床结果。使用以下数据库进行系统的文献检索:Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov,以纳入涉及老年糖尿病患者TH护理的研究。两位作者独立审查入围文章的全文。共纳入了四项符合入选标准的研究。一项研究显示,TH组的血糖控制略有恶化,但其余三项研究显示两组之间的血糖控制有所改善或没有差异。这篇综述表明,当作为F2F护理的辅助手段时,TH模式与单独使用F2F具有可比性,对于老年II型糖尿病患者具有相似或更好的血糖控制,特别是那些居住在农村社区,年龄超过75岁的患者,以及那些患有多种合并症且多次临床就诊的患者。
{"title":"Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies.","authors":"Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0135","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0135","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"179-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143459015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-05-07DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0227
Erin Leaver-Schmidt, Earlean Chambers, Elizabeth Ciemins, Cori Rattelman, Parag Agnihotri, Danielle Casanova, John Kennedy
Despite ample evidence supporting their efficacy in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) management, statin-prescribing and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement are underused, especially for vulnerable populations. This study explores the impact of a Best Practices Learning Collaborative to improve the management of patients with ASCVD for secondary prevention. Conducted with the guidance of a subject-matter expert advisory committee, the ASCVD Collaborative convened a geographically diverse group of health care organizations (HCOs) over a 12-month implementation period to set goals, develop and implement interventions, collect and track quality performance measures, and share best practices. Interventions included provider/staff education, clinical decision support tools, care coordination, patient education and awareness, and the treatment of very high-risk patients. HCOs tracked three measures for patients with established ASCVD: any statin prescribed (stratified by sex and race/ethnicity), high-intensity statin prescribed, and LDL-C control (<70 mg/dL). After a 12-month implementation period, HCOs demonstrated improvement in one or more measures. The Collaborative model was shown to be an effective means for achieving improvement in the management of ASCVD, laying the groundwork for future more rigorous studies to identify the most impactful interventions.
{"title":"Increasing Statin-Prescribing and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Control in Secondary Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Collaborative Approach.","authors":"Erin Leaver-Schmidt, Earlean Chambers, Elizabeth Ciemins, Cori Rattelman, Parag Agnihotri, Danielle Casanova, John Kennedy","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0227","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0227","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite ample evidence supporting their efficacy in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) management, statin-prescribing and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement are underused, especially for vulnerable populations. This study explores the impact of a Best Practices Learning Collaborative to improve the management of patients with ASCVD for secondary prevention. Conducted with the guidance of a subject-matter expert advisory committee, the ASCVD Collaborative convened a geographically diverse group of health care organizations (HCOs) over a 12-month implementation period to set goals, develop and implement interventions, collect and track quality performance measures, and share best practices. Interventions included provider/staff education, clinical decision support tools, care coordination, patient education and awareness, and the treatment of very high-risk patients. HCOs tracked three measures for patients with established ASCVD: any statin prescribed (stratified by sex and race/ethnicity), high-intensity statin prescribed, and LDL-C control (<70 mg/dL). After a 12-month implementation period, HCOs demonstrated improvement in one or more measures. The Collaborative model was shown to be an effective means for achieving improvement in the management of ASCVD, laying the groundwork for future more rigorous studies to identify the most impactful interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"131-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144040809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-17DOI: 10.1089/pop.2025.0028
Anthony C Stanowski, David Nash
{"title":"The Evolution of Population Health Management: Time to Accredit the Curriculum?","authors":"Anthony C Stanowski, David Nash","doi":"10.1089/pop.2025.0028","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2025.0028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"187-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143650001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors aimed to investigate potential differences between health care use and related payments for patients with complex needs and high costs in Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HCs) and with other safety net primary care providers. The authors used data from the California Health Homes Program that was designed to improve health outcomes and reduce expenditures of such Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. The authors used 2018 data prior to program implementation and conducted propensity score-matched regressions. The authors then estimated predicted rates of use across seven service categories and payment values for each category and for overall payments. The authors found that 29% of the sample were HC patients and had lower estimated average total payment values ($21,220) than group provider patients ($23,180). HC patients also had lower values for hospitalizations and long-term facility stays and higher values for primary and mental health services than all other providers. Payment differences were generally consistent with differences in predicted rates of use. These findings suggest that HC approaches to managing patient care access and integrated mental health services may explain these differences in use and payment patterns.
{"title":"Health Resources and Services Administration-Funded Health Centers Reduce Health Care Expenditures of California Medicaid Managed Care Beneficiaries with Complex Needs.","authors":"Nadereh Pourat, Weihao Zhou, Leigh Ann Haley, Jamie Ryan, Alek Sripipatana","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0241","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors aimed to investigate potential differences between health care use and related payments for patients with complex needs and high costs in Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HCs) and with other safety net primary care providers. The authors used data from the California Health Homes Program that was designed to improve health outcomes and reduce expenditures of such Medicaid managed care beneficiaries. The authors used 2018 data prior to program implementation and conducted propensity score-matched regressions. The authors then estimated predicted rates of use across seven service categories and payment values for each category and for overall payments. The authors found that 29% of the sample were HC patients and had lower estimated average total payment values ($21,220) than group provider patients ($23,180). HC patients also had lower values for hospitalizations and long-term facility stays and higher values for primary and mental health services than all other providers. Payment differences were generally consistent with differences in predicted rates of use. These findings suggest that HC approaches to managing patient care access and integrated mental health services may explain these differences in use and payment patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01Epub Date: 2025-03-28DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0245
Sasha Ruben Sioni, Lesley Manson, Nicholas Arledge
High-need, high-cost (HNHC) adults require comprehensive strategies that address both clinical and social determinants of health (SDOH). This retrospective, propensity score-matched study (n = 526) evaluated a care model integrating monthly SDOH screenings, medication oversight, and real-time admission-discharge-transfer alerts in four urban primary care clinics. Compared to usual care, the intervention significantly reduced acute utilization within 60 days: emergency department (ED) visits decreased by 0.17 (P < 0.001) and hospital admissions declined by 0.12 (P < 0.001). Gross per-participant costs fell from $6,019 to $2,422 (a $3,597 reduction); after accounting for intervention expenses, net savings reached $3,222 (P < 0.001), yielding an estimated 6.9:1 return on investment. Patient-reported outcomes also demonstrated significant gains: EQ-5D-5L scores increased by 0.082 (P < 0.001) in the intervention cohort, exceeding the threshold for clinically meaningful change, while Net Promoter Scores rose by 8.8 points (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed slightly smaller quality-of-life gains among non-White cohorts, highlighting the need for culturally tailored approaches to advance equity. These findings align with prior Population Health Management research showing that integrated care models can reduce costs and enhance patient satisfaction. Overall, this multifaceted model effectively curbs avoidable ED visits and admissions, generates short-term cost savings, and boosts patient satisfaction-key outcomes under value-based care contracts. Future research should investigate longer-term outcomes and refine equity-focused strategies to ensure sustained and inclusive benefits.
{"title":"Short-Term Gains, Enduring Potential: An Integrated SDOH-Focused Care Model Delivers Cost Savings and Patient-Reported Benefits.","authors":"Sasha Ruben Sioni, Lesley Manson, Nicholas Arledge","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0245","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0245","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-need, high-cost (HNHC) adults require comprehensive strategies that address both clinical and social determinants of health (SDOH). This retrospective, propensity score-matched study (<i>n</i> = 526) evaluated a care model integrating monthly SDOH screenings, medication oversight, and real-time admission-discharge-transfer alerts in four urban primary care clinics. Compared to usual care, the intervention significantly reduced acute utilization within 60 days: emergency department (ED) visits decreased by 0.17 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and hospital admissions declined by 0.12 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Gross per-participant costs fell from $6,019 to $2,422 (a $3,597 reduction); after accounting for intervention expenses, net savings reached $3,222 (<i>P</i> < 0.001), yielding an estimated 6.9:1 return on investment. Patient-reported outcomes also demonstrated significant gains: EQ-5D-5L scores increased by 0.082 (<i>P</i> < 0.001) in the intervention cohort, exceeding the threshold for clinically meaningful change, while Net Promoter Scores rose by 8.8 points (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed slightly smaller quality-of-life gains among non-White cohorts, highlighting the need for culturally tailored approaches to advance equity. These findings align with prior Population Health Management research showing that integrated care models can reduce costs and enhance patient satisfaction. Overall, this multifaceted model effectively curbs avoidable ED visits and admissions, generates short-term cost savings, and boosts patient satisfaction-key outcomes under value-based care contracts. Future research should investigate longer-term outcomes and refine equity-focused strategies to ensure sustained and inclusive benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"161-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1089/pop.2024.0170
Lina Tieu, Nadereh Pourat, Elizabeth Bromley, Rajat Simhan, Weihao Zhou, Xiao Chen, Beth Glenn, Roshan Bastani
Behavioral health integration (BHI) is increasingly implemented to expand capacity to address behavioral health conditions within primary care. Survey and claims data from the evaluation of the Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi-Cal program were used to examine the relationship between BHI and alcohol-related outcomes among Medicaid patients within 17 public hospitals in California. Key informant survey data measured hospital-level BHI at 3 levels (overall composite, infrastructure, and process domains, 10 themes). Multilevel logistic regression models estimated the relationship between BHI and outcomes indicating receipt of appropriate alcohol-related care (any primary care visit, any detoxification, timely initiation, timely engagement) and acute care (any emergency department [ED] visit or hospitalization, classified as alcohol-related or all-cause) in the year following an alcohol-related index encounter. Of 6196 patients, some had an alcohol-related primary care visit (33%), detoxification (16%), timely initiation (14%), or engagement in treatment (7%). ED visits resulting in discharge were more common (40% alcohol-related, 64% all-cause) than hospitalizations (15% alcohol-related, 26% all-cause). Controlling for patient-level characteristics, no significant relationships between overall BHI and these outcomes were observed. However, greater BHI infrastructure was associated with alcohol-related (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.05) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55). Associations emerged between BHI themes (eg, related to support of providers) and greater likelihood of alcohol-related detoxification, primary care visit, timely initiation, and acute care utilization. Findings suggest that implementing specific BHI components may improve receipt of alcohol-related treatment, and warrant future research into these relationships.
行为健康一体化(BHI)越来越多地得到实施,以扩大在初级保健中处理行为健康状况的能力。来自公立医院重新设计和Medi-Cal计划激励评估的调查和索赔数据被用于检查加州17家公立医院的医疗补助患者的身体健康和酒精相关结果之间的关系。关键信息者调查数据在3个级别(总体组合、基础设施和流程领域,10个主题)测量了医院级别的健康指数。多水平logistic回归模型估计了BHI与结果之间的关系,表明在酒精相关指数遭遇后的一年内接受适当的酒精相关护理(任何初级保健就诊、任何解毒、及时开始、及时参与)和急性护理(任何急诊[ED]就诊或住院,分类为酒精相关或全因)。在6196名患者中,一些人接受了与酒精有关的初级保健访问(33%),戒毒(16%),及时开始(14%)或参与治疗(7%)。急诊科就诊导致出院(40%与酒精有关,64%全因)比住院(15%与酒精有关,26%全因)更常见。在控制患者水平特征的情况下,没有观察到总体身体健康指数与这些结果之间的显著关系。然而,较高的BHI基础设施与酒精相关(比值比[OR] 1.86, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.14-3.05)和全因住院(比值比[OR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55)相关。BHI主题(例如,与提供者的支持有关)与酒精相关解毒、初级保健就诊、及时开始和急性护理利用的可能性较大之间存在关联。研究结果表明,实施特定的BHI成分可能会改善酒精相关治疗的接受情况,并为未来对这些关系的研究提供了依据。
{"title":"Assessing the Relationship Between Behavioral Health Integration and Alcohol-Related Treatment Among Patients with Medicaid.","authors":"Lina Tieu, Nadereh Pourat, Elizabeth Bromley, Rajat Simhan, Weihao Zhou, Xiao Chen, Beth Glenn, Roshan Bastani","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0170","DOIUrl":"10.1089/pop.2024.0170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral health integration (BHI) is increasingly implemented to expand capacity to address behavioral health conditions within primary care. Survey and claims data from the evaluation of the Public Hospital Redesign and Incentives in Medi-Cal program were used to examine the relationship between BHI and alcohol-related outcomes among Medicaid patients within 17 public hospitals in California. Key informant survey data measured hospital-level BHI at 3 levels (overall composite, infrastructure, and process domains, 10 themes). Multilevel logistic regression models estimated the relationship between BHI and outcomes indicating receipt of appropriate alcohol-related care (any primary care visit, any detoxification, timely initiation, timely engagement) and acute care (any emergency department [ED] visit or hospitalization, classified as alcohol-related or all-cause) in the year following an alcohol-related index encounter. Of 6196 patients, some had an alcohol-related primary care visit (33%), detoxification (16%), timely initiation (14%), or engagement in treatment (7%). ED visits resulting in discharge were more common (40% alcohol-related, 64% all-cause) than hospitalizations (15% alcohol-related, 26% all-cause). Controlling for patient-level characteristics, no significant relationships between overall BHI and these outcomes were observed. However, greater BHI infrastructure was associated with alcohol-related (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.05) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55). Associations emerged between BHI themes (eg, related to support of providers) and greater likelihood of alcohol-related detoxification, primary care visit, timely initiation, and acute care utilization. Findings suggest that implementing specific BHI components may improve receipt of alcohol-related treatment, and warrant future research into these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142807776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}