Talia Sopiyani, K. Rahayu, Erwin Aditya Pratama, Toni Haryadi, A. Hamzani
Indonesia has a strategic and favorable geographical condition to boost the economy. Likewise, India has diverse geographical conditions. Geographical indications are part of Intellectual Property Rights that are born from the work of human thought. The purpose of this study is to compare the legal arrangements of Geographical Indications between Indonesia and India and to examine the registration of Geographical Indications between Indonesia and India. This research is a type of library research. The approach used is normative, using secondary data and qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Regulation on Geographical Indications in Indonesia is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications and the regulation of the registration mechanism uses the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 12 of 2019. While the Regulation on Geographical Indications in India and Regulation of the mechanism registration using The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection Act, 1999 ).
{"title":"Comparison of the Law of Geographical Indications between Indonesia and India","authors":"Talia Sopiyani, K. Rahayu, Erwin Aditya Pratama, Toni Haryadi, A. Hamzani","doi":"10.55529/jls.12.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.12.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia has a strategic and favorable geographical condition to boost the economy. Likewise, India has diverse geographical conditions. Geographical indications are part of Intellectual Property Rights that are born from the work of human thought. The purpose of this study is to compare the legal arrangements of Geographical Indications between Indonesia and India and to examine the registration of Geographical Indications between Indonesia and India. This research is a type of library research. The approach used is normative, using secondary data and qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the Regulation on Geographical Indications in Indonesia is the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications and the regulation of the registration mechanism uses the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 12 of 2019. While the Regulation on Geographical Indications in India and Regulation of the mechanism registration using The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection Act, 1999 ).","PeriodicalId":205081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Subjects","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130411614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study assesses the functioning of yaa’aa yaaboo customary court (the Qaallu court), which is found in the Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia, in west the Shewa zone in the Ambo district. This court accepts and handles any criminal and civil cases unless cases are pending in the formal courts. The effectiveness of this court in course of handling both civil and criminal cases is rarely treated in different kinds of literatures. Thus, the aim of this article is to fill this gap. To realize this objective, the study employed a qualitative research approach. By showing the overall functioning of this court, this article recommended a legal reform that may include a constitutional amendment to give wider mandates than envisaged under the current constitution to customary justice institutions.
{"title":"A Quest for a Wider Mandates to Customary Justice Institutions in Ethiopia: A Particular Emphasis on ‘Yaa’aa Yaaboo’ (a Qaallu Court)","authors":"Kuma Beyene Fita","doi":"10.55529/jls.11.8.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.11.8.17","url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the functioning of yaa’aa yaaboo customary court (the Qaallu court), which is found in the Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia, in west the Shewa zone in the Ambo district. This court accepts and handles any criminal and civil cases unless cases are pending in the formal courts. The effectiveness of this court in course of handling both civil and criminal cases is rarely treated in different kinds of literatures. Thus, the aim of this article is to fill this gap. To realize this objective, the study employed a qualitative research approach. By showing the overall functioning of this court, this article recommended a legal reform that may include a constitutional amendment to give wider mandates than envisaged under the current constitution to customary justice institutions.","PeriodicalId":205081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Subjects","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127882995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The management of operations is what we call administration. Even while entire empires can collapse and other rulers can take their place, the administration of a country will continue on indefinitely. It is neither susceptible to transformation by revolution, nor can it be uprooted by upheaval. There were many dynasties that ruled over India, but the Mughal dynasty is considered to be the most significant because it dominated the country on Indian soil for the greatest stretch of time and had its own unique administrative structure. Between the years 1526 and 1707, the Mughals left their imprint on Hindu culture as well as on Hindu history. The Mughals held sway over India for a total of 181 years, during which period the country underwent a number of significant transformations. The Mughal Empire was significant because it united practically the whole Indian subcontinent under its control and brought the various regions of the subcontinent closer together by enhancing both their overland and coastal commercial networks. In addition to this, it was famous for the cultural impact. It was thought to be the first major empire to arise in India after the fall of the Gupta Dynasty. The study provides an insight into the Mughal administrative hierarchy. In order to arrive at a conclusion, the research used a combination of descriptive, historical, and analytical method with qualitative approach.
{"title":"Administrative Stracture of Mughals an Explanatory Study","authors":"Dr. Jayasree Dolvi","doi":"10.55529/jls11.18.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls11.18.24","url":null,"abstract":"The management of operations is what we call administration. Even while entire empires can collapse and other rulers can take their place, the administration of a country will continue on indefinitely. It is neither susceptible to transformation by revolution, nor can it be uprooted by upheaval. There were many dynasties that ruled over India, but the Mughal dynasty is considered to be the most significant because it dominated the country on Indian soil for the greatest stretch of time and had its own unique administrative structure. Between the years 1526 and 1707, the Mughals left their imprint on Hindu culture as well as on Hindu history. The Mughals held sway over India for a total of 181 years, during which period the country underwent a number of significant transformations. The Mughal Empire was significant because it united practically the whole Indian subcontinent under its control and brought the various regions of the subcontinent closer together by enhancing both their overland and coastal commercial networks. In addition to this, it was famous for the cultural impact. It was thought to be the first major empire to arise in India after the fall of the Gupta Dynasty. The study provides an insight into the Mughal administrative hierarchy. In order to arrive at a conclusion, the research used a combination of descriptive, historical, and analytical method with qualitative approach.","PeriodicalId":205081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Subjects","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126169317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
According to John Locke’s theory of property, once the person mixes their labour with a common property then that property, be it movable or immovable, belong to that person and they can use, possess or transfer it to a third party. But things are different in Ethiopia when woman’s right to property:-specifically their rights to immovable property are concerned. According to norms and values prevalent in most parts of Ethiopia, women cannot have rights to immovable property at all. They cannot possess, use or transfer these property by any means even if they contributed or mixes their labour with these different kinds of property. These customary laws are still winning out over legal frameworks in most rural parts of Ethiopia. This is a serious problem and results in unjust system of property.
{"title":"An Assessment of the Notions of Women’s Immovable Property Rights in Ethiopia in light of John Locke’s Theory of Property","authors":"Kuma Beyene Fita","doi":"10.55529/jls.11.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jls.11.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"According to John Locke’s theory of property, once the person mixes their labour with a common property then that property, be it movable or immovable, belong to that person and they can use, possess or transfer it to a third party. But things are different in Ethiopia when woman’s right to property:-specifically their rights to immovable property are concerned. According to norms and values prevalent in most parts of Ethiopia, women cannot have rights to immovable property at all. They cannot possess, use or transfer these property by any means even if they contributed or mixes their labour with these different kinds of property. These customary laws are still winning out over legal frameworks in most rural parts of Ethiopia. This is a serious problem and results in unjust system of property.","PeriodicalId":205081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Subjects","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132872162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：