Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)最新文献
We study first-order model checking, by which we refer to the problem of deciding whether or not a given first-order sentence is satisfied by a given finite structure. In particular, we aim to understand on which sets of sentences this problem is tractable, in the sense of parameterized complexity theory. To this end, we define the notion of a graph-like sentence set, which definition is inspired by previous work on first-order model checking wherein the permitted connectives and quantifiers were restricted. Our main theorem is the complete tractability classification of such graphlike sentence sets, which is (to our knowledge) the first complexity classification theorem concerning a class of sentences that has no restriction on the connectives and quantifiers. To present and prove our classification, we introduce and develop a novel complexity-theoretic framework which is built on parameterized complexity and includes new notions of reduction.
{"title":"The tractability frontier of graph-like first-order query sets","authors":"Hubie Chen","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603119","url":null,"abstract":"We study first-order model checking, by which we refer to the problem of deciding whether or not a given first-order sentence is satisfied by a given finite structure. In particular, we aim to understand on which sets of sentences this problem is tractable, in the sense of parameterized complexity theory. To this end, we define the notion of a graph-like sentence set, which definition is inspired by previous work on first-order model checking wherein the permitted connectives and quantifiers were restricted. Our main theorem is the complete tractability classification of such graphlike sentence sets, which is (to our knowledge) the first complexity classification theorem concerning a class of sentences that has no restriction on the connectives and quantifiers. To present and prove our classification, we introduce and develop a novel complexity-theoretic framework which is built on parameterized complexity and includes new notions of reduction.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83531492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper studies the discriminating power offered by higher-order concurrent languages, and contrasts this power with those offered by higher-order sequential languages (à la λ-calculus) and by first-order concurrent languages (à la CCS). The concurrent higher-order languages that we focus on are Higher-Order π-calculus (HOπ), which supports higher-order communication, and an extension of HOπ with passivation, a simple higher-order construct that allows one to obtain location-dependent process behaviours. The comparison is carried out by providing embeddings of first-order processes into the various languages, and then examining the resulting contextual equivalences induced on such processes. As first-order processes we consider both ordinary Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs) and Reactive Probabilistic Labeled Transition Systems (RPLTSs). The hierarchy of discriminating powers so obtained for RPLTSs is finer than that for LTSs. For instance, in the LTS case, the additional discriminating power offered by passivation in concurrency is captured, in sequential languages, by the difference between the call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation strategies of an extended typed λ-calculus.
本文研究了高阶并发语言提供的判别能力，并将其与高阶顺序语言( la λ-calculus)和一阶并发语言( la CCS)提供的判别能力进行了比较。我们关注的并发高阶语言是支持高阶通信的高阶π演算(HOπ)，以及对HOπ的扩展和钝化，钝化是一种简单的高阶结构，允许人们获得依赖于位置的进程行为。比较是通过将一阶过程嵌入到各种语言中，然后检查在这些过程中产生的上下文等效性来进行的。作为一阶过程，我们考虑了普通标记转移系统(LTSs)和反应概率标记转移系统(rplts)。由此得到的rplts识别能力层次比lts更精细。例如，在LTS的情况下，在顺序语言中，通过扩展类型λ演算的按名称调用和按值调用计算策略之间的差异，获得了并发性中钝化所提供的额外判别能力。
{"title":"On the discriminating power of passivation and higher-order interaction","authors":"M. Bernardo, D. Sangiorgi, Valeria Vignudelli","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603113","url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the discriminating power offered by higher-order concurrent languages, and contrasts this power with those offered by higher-order sequential languages (à la λ-calculus) and by first-order concurrent languages (à la CCS). The concurrent higher-order languages that we focus on are Higher-Order π-calculus (HOπ), which supports higher-order communication, and an extension of HOπ with passivation, a simple higher-order construct that allows one to obtain location-dependent process behaviours. The comparison is carried out by providing embeddings of first-order processes into the various languages, and then examining the resulting contextual equivalences induced on such processes. As first-order processes we consider both ordinary Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs) and Reactive Probabilistic Labeled Transition Systems (RPLTSs). The hierarchy of discriminating powers so obtained for RPLTSs is finer than that for LTSs. For instance, in the LTS case, the additional discriminating power offered by passivation in concurrency is captured, in sequential languages, by the difference between the call-by-name and call-by-value evaluation strategies of an extended typed λ-calculus.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85493555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We describe a framework for game semantics combining operational and denotational accounts. A game is a bipartite graph of "passive" and "active" positions, or a categorical variant with morphisms between positions. The operational part of the framework is given by a labelled transition system in which each state sits in a particular position of the game. From a state in a passive position, transitions are labelled with a valid O-move from that position, and take us to a state over the updated position. Transitions from states in an active position are likewise labelled with a valid P-move, but silent transitions are allowed, which must take us to a state in the same position. The denotational part is given by a "transfer" from one game to another, a kind of program that converts moves between the two games, giving an operation on strategies. The agreement between the two parts is given by a relation called a "stepped bisimulation". The framework is illustrated by an example of substitution within a lambda-calculus.
{"title":"Transition systems over games","authors":"P. Levy, S. Staton","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603150","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603150","url":null,"abstract":"We describe a framework for game semantics combining operational and denotational accounts. A game is a bipartite graph of \"passive\" and \"active\" positions, or a categorical variant with morphisms between positions. The operational part of the framework is given by a labelled transition system in which each state sits in a particular position of the game. From a state in a passive position, transitions are labelled with a valid O-move from that position, and take us to a state over the updated position. Transitions from states in an active position are likewise labelled with a valid P-move, but silent transitions are allowed, which must take us to a state in the same position. The denotational part is given by a \"transfer\" from one game to another, a kind of program that converts moves between the two games, giving an operation on strategies. The agreement between the two parts is given by a relation called a \"stepped bisimulation\". The framework is illustrated by an example of substitution within a lambda-calculus.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76384761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We introduce parameterized communicating automata (PCA) as a model of systems where finite-state processes communicate through FIFO channels. Unlike classical communicating automata, a given PCA can be run on any network topology of bounded degree. The topology is thus a parameter of the system. We provide various Büchi-Elgot-Trakhtenbrot theorems for PCA, which roughly read as follows: Given a logical specification φ and a class of topologies T there is a PCA that is equivalent to φ on all topologies from T. We give uniform constructions which allow us to instantiate T with concrete classes such as pipelines, ranked trees, grids, rings, etc. The proofs build on a locality theorem for first-order logic due to Schwentick and Barthelmann, and they exploit concepts from the non-parameterized case, notably a result by Genest, Kuske, and Muscholl.
{"title":"Logic for communicating automata with parameterized topology","authors":"B. Bollig","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603093","url":null,"abstract":"We introduce parameterized communicating automata (PCA) as a model of systems where finite-state processes communicate through FIFO channels. Unlike classical communicating automata, a given PCA can be run on any network topology of bounded degree. The topology is thus a parameter of the system. We provide various Büchi-Elgot-Trakhtenbrot theorems for PCA, which roughly read as follows: Given a logical specification φ and a class of topologies T there is a PCA that is equivalent to φ on all topologies from T. We give uniform constructions which allow us to instantiate T with concrete classes such as pipelines, ranked trees, grids, rings, etc. The proofs build on a locality theorem for first-order logic due to Schwentick and Barthelmann, and they exploit concepts from the non-parameterized case, notably a result by Genest, Kuske, and Muscholl.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75123424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabbay's separation theorem is a fundamental result for linear temporal logic (LTL). We show that separating a restricted class of LTL formulas, called anchored LTL, is elementary if and only if the translation from LTL to the linear temporal logic with only future temporal connectives is elementary. To prove this result, we define a canonical separation for LTL, and establish a correspondence between a canonical separation of anchored LTL formulas and the ω-automata that recognize these formulas. The canonical separation of anchored LTL formulas has two further applications. First, we constructively prove that the safety closure of any LTL property is an LTL property, thus proving the decomposition theorem for LTL: every LTL formula is equivalent to the conjunction of a safety LTL formula and a liveness LTL formula. Second, we characterize safety, liveness, absolute liveness, stable, and fairness properties in LTL. Our characterization is effective: We reduce the problem of deciding whether an LTL formula defines any of these properties to the validity problem for LTL.
{"title":"Anchored LTL separation","authors":"Grgur Petric Maretic, M. Dashti, D. Basin","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603139","url":null,"abstract":"Gabbay's separation theorem is a fundamental result for linear temporal logic (LTL). We show that separating a restricted class of LTL formulas, called anchored LTL, is elementary if and only if the translation from LTL to the linear temporal logic with only future temporal connectives is elementary. To prove this result, we define a canonical separation for LTL, and establish a correspondence between a canonical separation of anchored LTL formulas and the ω-automata that recognize these formulas. The canonical separation of anchored LTL formulas has two further applications. First, we constructively prove that the safety closure of any LTL property is an LTL property, thus proving the decomposition theorem for LTL: every LTL formula is equivalent to the conjunction of a safety LTL formula and a liveness LTL formula. Second, we characterize safety, liveness, absolute liveness, stable, and fairness properties in LTL. Our characterization is effective: We reduce the problem of deciding whether an LTL formula defines any of these properties to the validity problem for LTL.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88361464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The standard proof theory for logics with equality and fixpoints suffers from limitations of the sequent calculus, where reasoning is separated from computational tasks such as unification or rewriting. We propose in this paper an extension of the calculus of structures, a deep inference formalism, that supports incremental and contextual reasoning with equality and fixpoints in the setting of linear logic. This system allows deductive and computational steps to mix freely in a continuum which integrates smoothly into the usual versatile rules of multiplicative-additive linear logic in deep inference.
{"title":"Equality and fixpoints in the calculus of structures","authors":"Kaustuv Chaudhuri, Nicolas Guenot","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603140","url":null,"abstract":"The standard proof theory for logics with equality and fixpoints suffers from limitations of the sequent calculus, where reasoning is separated from computational tasks such as unification or rewriting. We propose in this paper an extension of the calculus of structures, a deep inference formalism, that supports incremental and contextual reasoning with equality and fixpoints in the setting of linear logic. This system allows deductive and computational steps to mix freely in a continuum which integrates smoothly into the usual versatile rules of multiplicative-additive linear logic in deep inference.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80415807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We introduce type-checking games, which are ω-regular games over Böhm trees, determined by a type of the Kobayashi-Ong intersection type system. These games are a higher-type extension of parity games over trees, determined by an alternating parity tree automaton. However, in contrast to these games over trees, the "game boards" of our type-checking games are composable, using the composition of Böhm trees. Moreover the winner (and winning strategies) of a composite game is completely determined by the respective winners (and winning strategies) of the component games. To our knowledge, type-checking games give the first compositional analysis of higher-order model checking, or the model checking of trees generated by recursion schemes. We study a higher-type analogue of higher-order model checking, namely, the problem to decide the winner of a type-checking game over the Böhm tree generated by an arbitrary λY-term. We introduce a new type-assignment system and use it to prove that the problem is decidable. On the semantic side, we develop a novel (two-level) arena game model for type-checking games, which is a cartesian closed category equipped with parametric monad and comonad that themselves form a parametrised adjunction.
{"title":"Compositional higher-order model checking via ω-regular games over Böhm trees","authors":"Takeshi Tsukada, C. Ong","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603133","url":null,"abstract":"We introduce type-checking games, which are ω-regular games over Böhm trees, determined by a type of the Kobayashi-Ong intersection type system. These games are a higher-type extension of parity games over trees, determined by an alternating parity tree automaton. However, in contrast to these games over trees, the \"game boards\" of our type-checking games are composable, using the composition of Böhm trees. Moreover the winner (and winning strategies) of a composite game is completely determined by the respective winners (and winning strategies) of the component games. To our knowledge, type-checking games give the first compositional analysis of higher-order model checking, or the model checking of trees generated by recursion schemes. We study a higher-type analogue of higher-order model checking, namely, the problem to decide the winner of a type-checking game over the Böhm tree generated by an arbitrary λY-term. We introduce a new type-assignment system and use it to prove that the problem is decidable. On the semantic side, we develop a novel (two-level) arena game model for type-checking games, which is a cartesian closed category equipped with parametric monad and comonad that themselves form a parametrised adjunction.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90475240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper studies the boundedness and termination problems for vector addition systems equipped with one stack. We introduce an algorithm, inspired by the Karp & Miller algorithm, that solves both problems for the larger class of well-structured pushdown systems. We show that the worst-case running time of this algorithm is hyper-Ackermannian for pushdown vector addition systems. For the upper bound, we introduce the notion of bad nested words over a well-quasi-ordered set, and we provide a general scheme of induction for bounding their lengths. We derive from this scheme a hyper-Ackermannian upper bound for the length of bad nested words over vectors of natural numbers. For the lower bound, we exhibit a family of pushdown vector addition systems with finite but large reachability sets (hyper-Ackermannian).
{"title":"Hyper-Ackermannian bounds for pushdown vector addition systems","authors":"Jérôme Leroux, M. Praveen, G. Sutre","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603146","url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the boundedness and termination problems for vector addition systems equipped with one stack. We introduce an algorithm, inspired by the Karp & Miller algorithm, that solves both problems for the larger class of well-structured pushdown systems. We show that the worst-case running time of this algorithm is hyper-Ackermannian for pushdown vector addition systems. For the upper bound, we introduce the notion of bad nested words over a well-quasi-ordered set, and we provide a general scheme of induction for bounding their lengths. We derive from this scheme a hyper-Ackermannian upper bound for the length of bad nested words over vectors of natural numbers. For the lower bound, we exhibit a family of pushdown vector addition systems with finite but large reachability sets (hyper-Ackermannian).","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89844257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We construct quasipolynomial-size proofs of the propositional pigeonhole principle in the deep inference system KS, addressing an open problem raised in previous works and matching the best known upper bound for the more general class of monotone proofs. We make significant use of monotone formulae computing boolean threshold functions, an idea previously considered in works of Atserias et al. The main construction, monotone proofs witnessing the symmetry of such functions, involves an implementation of merge-sort in the design of proofs in order to tame the structural behaviour of atoms, and so the complexity of normalization. Proof transformations from previous work on atomic flows are then employed to yield appropriate KS proofs. As further results we show that our constructions can be applied to provide quasipolynomial-size KS proofs of the parity principle and the generalized pigeonhole principle. These bounds are inherited for the class of monotone proofs, and we are further able to construct nO(log log n)-size monotone proofs of the weak pigeonhole principle with (1 + ε)n pigeons and n holes for ε = 1/logk n, thereby also improving the best known bounds for monotone proofs.
{"title":"On the pigeonhole and related principles in deep inference and monotone systems","authors":"Anupam Das","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603164","url":null,"abstract":"We construct quasipolynomial-size proofs of the propositional pigeonhole principle in the deep inference system KS, addressing an open problem raised in previous works and matching the best known upper bound for the more general class of monotone proofs. We make significant use of monotone formulae computing boolean threshold functions, an idea previously considered in works of Atserias et al. The main construction, monotone proofs witnessing the symmetry of such functions, involves an implementation of merge-sort in the design of proofs in order to tame the structural behaviour of atoms, and so the complexity of normalization. Proof transformations from previous work on atomic flows are then employed to yield appropriate KS proofs. As further results we show that our constructions can be applied to provide quasipolynomial-size KS proofs of the parity principle and the generalized pigeonhole principle. These bounds are inherited for the class of monotone proofs, and we are further able to construct nO(log log n)-size monotone proofs of the weak pigeonhole principle with (1 + ε)n pigeons and n holes for ε = 1/logk n, thereby also improving the best known bounds for monotone proofs.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76050210","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We study two refinements of the linear π-calculus that ensure deadlock freedom (the absence of stable states with pending linear communications) and lock freedom (the eventual completion of pending linear communications). The main feature of both type systems is a new form of channel polymorphism that affects their accuracy in a significant way: they are the first of their kind that can deal with recursive processes connected by cyclic networks.
{"title":"Deadlock and lock freedom in the linear π-calculus","authors":"L. Padovani","doi":"10.1145/2603088.2603116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2603088.2603116","url":null,"abstract":"We study two refinements of the linear π-calculus that ensure deadlock freedom (the absence of stable states with pending linear communications) and lock freedom (the eventual completion of pending linear communications). The main feature of both type systems is a new form of channel polymorphism that affects their accuracy in a significant way: they are the first of their kind that can deal with recursive processes connected by cyclic networks.","PeriodicalId":20649,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75636657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of the Twenty-Third EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL) and the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：