Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1177/15269248241304793
Samantha Facer
{"title":"Organ Donation Changed My Life.","authors":"Samantha Facer","doi":"10.1177/15269248241304793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241304793","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"43-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-16DOI: 10.1177/15269248241307160
Macey L Levan, Alin Gragossian
{"title":"Empowering the Voice of Patients, Families, and Caregivers Through Participation in Organ Donation and Transplantation Conferences.","authors":"Macey L Levan, Alin Gragossian","doi":"10.1177/15269248241307160","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241307160","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"48-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142838976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1177/15269248241304792
Earnest Davis, Jennifer Jones, Molly McCarthy, Katie McKee, Morgan Reid, Dale Rogers, Rolanda Schmidt, Ameen Tabatabai, Allyson Hart
{"title":"The Impact of Engaging Transplant Recipients in Health Care Policy Deliberations.","authors":"Earnest Davis, Jennifer Jones, Molly McCarthy, Katie McKee, Morgan Reid, Dale Rogers, Rolanda Schmidt, Ameen Tabatabai, Allyson Hart","doi":"10.1177/15269248241304792","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241304792","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"45-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1177/15269248241288566
Thomas H Feeley, Stephanie J Gillis
Background: The aim of the current study is to understand Americans' attitudes toward deceased organ donation and to assess their level of acceptance on positions toward organ donation. Methods: In summer and winter of 2023, 2 national samples completed measures of attitudes toward donation, reported their registration status, rated positions related to donation, and provided demographic information. Results: Data from 2 samples indicated registration estimates between 50% and 57% and a significant proportion of those unregistered reported reluctance to register. The believability of national registry estimates and ratings of acceptability of 9 organ donation positions differed by registration status. Conclusion: Mass media and motor vehicles interventions seeking to increase registration rates should take into consideration individual attitudes and support toward donation may not be as strong as once thought.
{"title":"Reconsidering Public Attitudes Toward Deceased Organ Donation Registration.","authors":"Thomas H Feeley, Stephanie J Gillis","doi":"10.1177/15269248241288566","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241288566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of the current study is to understand Americans' attitudes toward deceased organ donation and to assess their level of acceptance on positions toward organ donation. <b>Methods:</b> In summer and winter of 2023, 2 national samples completed measures of attitudes toward donation, reported their registration status, rated positions related to donation, and provided demographic information. <b>Results:</b> Data from 2 samples indicated registration estimates between 50% and 57% and a significant proportion of those unregistered reported reluctance to register. The believability of national registry estimates and ratings of acceptability of 9 organ donation positions differed by registration status. <b>Conclusion:</b> Mass media and motor vehicles interventions seeking to increase registration rates should take into consideration individual attitudes and support toward donation may not be as strong as once thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"165-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-13DOI: 10.1177/15269248241288568
Oleksandr Boiko, Ignacio Garcia-Alonso, Adela Navarro, Asier Maldonado, Sergio Prieto, Ana Llorente, Florina Iliuta, Joel Sanz, Ivan Olano, Beatriz Martinez, Oskar Estrade, Jesus Padilla
Introduction: Lymphocele is a common complication post-kidney transplantation, influenced by various factors including surgical technique, graft vessel count, operator experience, body mass index, ischemia time, and immunotherapy regimens.
Project aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate lymphocele risk factors, particularly focusing on the role of end-stage kidney disease.
Design: A retrospective study was conducted on renal transplant recipients from a single center (March 2020 to December 2022). Patients were categorized into those developing lymphocele and those without during the postoperative period. Data, including sociodemographic, personal history, graft-related variables, intervention, and postoperative outcomes, were collected from electronic medical records.
Results: Out of 291 renal transplant recipients, 57 (19.6%) developed postoperative lymphocele, with 15 (5.1%) being symptomatic. Patients with body mass index <24.9 kg/m2 have lower risk of developing lymphocele with an Odds Ratio of 0.538 (P=0.046). Higher lymphocele prevalence was noted in patients with chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (46.2%; OR 3.815; P=0.024). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis patients showed no lymphocele (0.0%; OR 0.123; P=0.048). Other factors, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, did not exhibit significant differences in lymphocele prevalence.
Conclusion: The etiology of end-stage kidney disease can serve as a significant predictor of lymphocele development during the postoperative period following renal transplantation. Further larger prospective studies are required to comprehensively assess risk factors and explore end-stage kidney disease potential role in predicting lymphocele formation.
{"title":"Evaluating Predictive Factors for Lymphocele Formation Following Kidney Transplantation.","authors":"Oleksandr Boiko, Ignacio Garcia-Alonso, Adela Navarro, Asier Maldonado, Sergio Prieto, Ana Llorente, Florina Iliuta, Joel Sanz, Ivan Olano, Beatriz Martinez, Oskar Estrade, Jesus Padilla","doi":"10.1177/15269248241288568","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241288568","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lymphocele is a common complication post-kidney transplantation, influenced by various factors including surgical technique, graft vessel count, operator experience, body mass index, ischemia time, and immunotherapy regimens.</p><p><strong>Project aims: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate lymphocele risk factors, particularly focusing on the role of end-stage kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on renal transplant recipients from a single center (March 2020 to December 2022). Patients were categorized into those developing lymphocele and those without during the postoperative period. Data, including sociodemographic, personal history, graft-related variables, intervention, and postoperative outcomes, were collected from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 291 renal transplant recipients, 57 (19.6%) developed postoperative lymphocele, with 15 (5.1%) being symptomatic. Patients with body mass index <24.9 kg/m2 have lower risk of developing lymphocele with an Odds Ratio of 0.538 (P=0.046). Higher lymphocele prevalence was noted in patients with chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (46.2%; OR 3.815; P=0.024). Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis patients showed no lymphocele (0.0%; OR 0.123; P=0.048). Other factors, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, did not exhibit significant differences in lymphocele prevalence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etiology of end-stage kidney disease can serve as a significant predictor of lymphocele development during the postoperative period following renal transplantation. Further larger prospective studies are required to comprehensively assess risk factors and explore end-stage kidney disease potential role in predicting lymphocele formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142473155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1177/15269248241289149
Jane Simanovski, Jody Ralph, Sherry Morrell
Introduction: Gaps exist in the understanding of the etiology of poor sleep quality after lung transplantation. Research Question: What factors are associated with poor sleep quality in lung transplant recipients?
Design: A quantitative, single-site, cross-sectional study used an anonymous survey based on 3 scales. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale with scores dichotomized to poor versus good sleepers based on the cutoff score > 8. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale evaluated symptoms of anxiety and depression, and the Short Form-12 measured health-related quality of life using the mental and physical component scores. Additional self-reported data included demographic and transplant-related variables.
Results: The response rate was 38.4% (61/158), and 52.5% of the sample (32/61) evidenced a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score > 8, suggestive of poor sleep quality. Bivariate analyses demonstrated that poor sleep was significantly related to symptoms of depression (P < .01), anxiety (P < .01), stressors of hospitalization (P < .05), and treatment of acute rejection (P < .05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anxiety was significantly associated with poor sleep (odds ratio = 1.34, P < .05).
Conclusion: Poor subjective sleep quality remains prevalent in lung transplant recipients. Individuals with anxiety symptoms were at a greater risk for poor sleep. Guidance for strategies to improve sleep quality requires further in-depth exploration before implementation of interventions.
{"title":"Key Associations Found in the Struggle With Sleep in Lung Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Jane Simanovski, Jody Ralph, Sherry Morrell","doi":"10.1177/15269248241289149","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241289149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gaps exist in the understanding of the etiology of poor sleep quality after lung transplantation. Research Question: What factors are associated with poor sleep quality in lung transplant recipients?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quantitative, single-site, cross-sectional study used an anonymous survey based on 3 scales. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale with scores dichotomized to poor versus good sleepers based on the cutoff score > 8. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale evaluated symptoms of anxiety and depression, and the Short Form-12 measured health-related quality of life using the mental and physical component scores. Additional self-reported data included demographic and transplant-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 38.4% (61/158), and 52.5% of the sample (32/61) evidenced a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score > 8, suggestive of poor sleep quality. Bivariate analyses demonstrated that poor sleep was significantly related to symptoms of depression (<i>P</i> < .01), anxiety (<i>P</i> < .01), stressors of hospitalization (<i>P</i> < .05), and treatment of acute rejection (<i>P</i> < .05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anxiety was significantly associated with poor sleep (odds ratio = 1.34, <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor subjective sleep quality remains prevalent in lung transplant recipients. Individuals with anxiety symptoms were at a greater risk for poor sleep. Guidance for strategies to improve sleep quality requires further in-depth exploration before implementation of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"183-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142473156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1177/15269248241288563
Alison F Marshall, Carmen Mandac, FeiFei Qin, Derek Boothroyd, Annette S Nasr
Introduction: Life expectancy for pediatric liver transplant patients has increased over the past decade. Different stages of the transplant process can impact patients' quality of life (QOL) and create psychological and physical stressors. This study explored whether age at transplant affected adolescents' feelings of anxiety, depression, and QOL. Design: In this cross-sectional quantitative study, data were collected on 22 adolescent patients aged 13-18 who received a transplant at least 12 months before enrollment. This cohort was divided into 2 groups based on their age at transplant: Group 1 (0-5 years) and Group 2 (6-18 years). To assess transplant-related anxiety, depression, and QOL, participants completed 3 surveys: the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Transplant Module (PedsQL TM). Results: Group 1 experienced less anxiety and fewer problems based on GAD-7 scores but reported stronger feelings of depression based on PHQ-9 scores. Based on the PedsQL TM scale, Group 1 had higher mean scores compared to Group 2 across all components (mean difference range: 7.2- 27.3; Cohen's d range: 0.27 - 1.13). The largest difference between the 2 groups was observed on the PedsQL TM scale's How I Look (Group 1 mean 81.1 vs. Group 2 mean 53.8; Cohen's d: 1.13; P = 0.015), Conclusion: In this cohort, age at transplant affected adolescents' feelings of anxiety, depression, and QOL. Awareness of these findings can help clinicians screen for and address mental health issues.
{"title":"Effect of Age at Liver Transplant on Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life Among Adolescents.","authors":"Alison F Marshall, Carmen Mandac, FeiFei Qin, Derek Boothroyd, Annette S Nasr","doi":"10.1177/15269248241288563","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241288563","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Life expectancy for pediatric liver transplant patients has increased over the past decade. Different stages of the transplant process can impact patients' quality of life (QOL) and create psychological and physical stressors. This study explored whether age at transplant affected adolescents' feelings of anxiety, depression, and QOL. <b>Design</b>: In this cross-sectional quantitative study, data were collected on 22 adolescent patients aged 13-18 who received a transplant at least 12 months before enrollment. This cohort was divided into 2 groups based on their age at transplant: Group 1 (0-5 years) and Group 2 (6-18 years). To assess transplant-related anxiety, depression, and QOL, participants completed 3 surveys: the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ Transplant Module (PedsQL TM). <b>Results</b>: Group 1 experienced less anxiety and fewer problems based on GAD-7 scores but reported stronger feelings of depression based on PHQ-9 scores. Based on the PedsQL TM scale, Group 1 had higher mean scores compared to Group 2 across all components (mean difference range: 7.2- 27.3; Cohen's d range: 0.27 - 1.13). The largest difference between the 2 groups was observed on the PedsQL TM scale's How I Look (Group 1 mean 81.1 vs. Group 2 mean 53.8; Cohen's d: 1.13; P = 0.015), <b>Conclusion</b>: In this cohort, age at transplant affected adolescents' feelings of anxiety, depression, and QOL. Awareness of these findings can help clinicians screen for and address mental health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"192-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142473154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1177/15269248241288558
Nicholas R Henry, Joellen E Coryell
Introduction: Some family members who previously made the decision to donate a family member's organs support the organ procurement organization (OPO) through volunteer work. Volunteers were asked to describe their family's organ donation story to educate the general and medical communities about organ donation. This study explored the transformative learning experienced by volunteers during and following the organ donation consent process and throughout their volunteer work. Methods/Approach: A narrative inquiry research methodology and transformative learning theoretical framework was used and 6 volunteers were recruited to participate. Two semistructured virtual interviews were conducted. Interviews were transcribed, radically reduced, and subjected to holistic-content and holistic-form narrative analysis. Findings: Participants experienced strong emotional responses during and after the loss of their family member, characterized as a period of disorientation, which lasted for an extended period preventing transformative learning. After the OPO contacted participants regarding the opportunity to volunteer, participants experienced a period of self-examination when they reengaged with the topic of organ donation. Critical reflection occurred through the act of storytelling about their family's organ donation story during their volunteer work. Storytelling to the community facilitated making meaning of their loss and transformations. Conclusion: Volunteering for an OPO played an important role by initiating self-examination and critical reflection of their prior assumptions. Through storytelling, participants reflected on their roles and made meaning of their organ donation experiences. The act of inviting donor families to reengage with the topic of organ donation through volunteer work fostered positive permanent meaningful transformations.
{"title":"Transformative Learning Among Organ Procurement Organization Donor Family Volunteers.","authors":"Nicholas R Henry, Joellen E Coryell","doi":"10.1177/15269248241288558","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15269248241288558","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Some family members who previously made the decision to donate a family member's organs support the organ procurement organization (OPO) through volunteer work. Volunteers were asked to describe their family's organ donation story to educate the general and medical communities about organ donation. This study explored the transformative learning experienced by volunteers during and following the organ donation consent process and throughout their volunteer work. <b>Methods/Approach:</b> A narrative inquiry research methodology and transformative learning theoretical framework was used and 6 volunteers were recruited to participate. Two semistructured virtual interviews were conducted. Interviews were transcribed, radically reduced, and subjected to holistic-content and holistic-form narrative analysis. <b>Findings:</b> Participants experienced strong emotional responses during and after the loss of their family member, characterized as a period of disorientation, which lasted for an extended period preventing transformative learning. After the OPO contacted participants regarding the opportunity to volunteer, participants experienced a period of self-examination when they reengaged with the topic of organ donation. Critical reflection occurred through the act of storytelling about their family's organ donation story during their volunteer work. Storytelling to the community facilitated making meaning of their loss and transformations. <b>Conclusion:</b> Volunteering for an OPO played an important role by initiating self-examination and critical reflection of their prior assumptions. Through storytelling, participants reflected on their roles and made meaning of their organ donation experiences. The act of inviting donor families to reengage with the topic of organ donation through volunteer work fostered positive permanent meaningful transformations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"170-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142473157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}