首页 > 最新文献

Psychiatric services最新文献

英文 中文
Experiences With Online Mutual Support Groups for Problematic Drinking. 酗酒问题在线互助小组的经验。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240551
Jessica L Sousa, Haiden A Huskamp, Ateev Mehrotra, Alisa B Busch, Lori Uscher-Pines

Objective: This study sought to evaluate how the recent increase in use of online meetings has influenced participant experiences with peer-based mutual support groups for problematic drinking.

Methods: The authors conducted semistructured interviews in June and July 2024 with 20 adults who participated in online mutual support meetings for problematic drinking. Participants were recruited from a nationwide online research panel. The authors conducted an ideal-type analysis to compare the experiences of individuals who differed in their modality (online vs. in person) preferences and motivations for using online meetings.

Results: The authors identified four distinct types of online meeting users, who varied in their perceptions about the advantages of online meetings. Meeting maximizers valued flexibility and convenience and used online meetings to supplement in-person participation. Strategists viewed online meetings as a source of new ideas and urgent support and used a mix of both modalities to capitalize on the perceived distinct advantages of each. Online enthusiasts preferred online meetings because they afforded increased anonymity and control and reduced social pressure. Finally, compliance seekers preferred online meetings for their efficiency in facilitating compliance with legal requirements. Participants of all types reported technological barriers, inconsistent quality, and greater potential for disruptions as disadvantages of online meetings.

Conclusions: Online meetings offer distinct advantages for individuals with differing motivations for engaging in peer-based mutual support groups, functioning as a gateway support for some people and as an essential supplement to ongoing in-person support for others.

目的:本研究旨在评估最近在线会议使用的增加如何影响参与者在以同伴为基础的相互支持小组中对问题饮酒的体验。方法:作者于2024年6月和7月对20名参加问题饮酒在线互助会议的成年人进行了半结构化访谈。参与者是从一个全国性的在线调查小组中招募的。作者进行了一项理想类型分析,以比较不同方式(在线与面对面)的个人体验,以及使用在线会议的偏好和动机。结果:作者确定了四种不同类型的在线会议用户,他们对在线会议优势的看法各不相同。会议最大化者重视灵活性和便利性,并使用在线会议作为面对面参与的补充。战略家将在线会议视为新想法和紧急支持的来源,并将这两种方式混合使用,以充分利用各自的独特优势。网络爱好者更喜欢在线会议,因为它们提供了更多的匿名性和控制,减少了社会压力。最后,寻求合规性的人更喜欢在线会议,因为它们在促进遵守法律要求方面效率更高。所有类型的参与者都报告了在线会议的缺点:技术障碍、质量不一致以及更大的中断可能性。结论:在线会议为参与基于同伴的相互支持小组的不同动机的个人提供了明显的优势,对一些人来说是一种门户支持,对另一些人来说是一种持续的面对面支持的必要补充。
{"title":"Experiences With Online Mutual Support Groups for Problematic Drinking.","authors":"Jessica L Sousa, Haiden A Huskamp, Ateev Mehrotra, Alisa B Busch, Lori Uscher-Pines","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240551","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240551","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to evaluate how the recent increase in use of online meetings has influenced participant experiences with peer-based mutual support groups for problematic drinking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted semistructured interviews in June and July 2024 with 20 adults who participated in online mutual support meetings for problematic drinking. Participants were recruited from a nationwide online research panel. The authors conducted an ideal-type analysis to compare the experiences of individuals who differed in their modality (online vs. in person) preferences and motivations for using online meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified four distinct types of online meeting users, who varied in their perceptions about the advantages of online meetings. Meeting maximizers valued flexibility and convenience and used online meetings to supplement in-person participation. Strategists viewed online meetings as a source of new ideas and urgent support and used a mix of both modalities to capitalize on the perceived distinct advantages of each. Online enthusiasts preferred online meetings because they afforded increased anonymity and control and reduced social pressure. Finally, compliance seekers preferred online meetings for their efficiency in facilitating compliance with legal requirements. Participants of all types reported technological barriers, inconsistent quality, and greater potential for disruptions as disadvantages of online meetings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online meetings offer distinct advantages for individuals with differing motivations for engaging in peer-based mutual support groups, functioning as a gateway support for some people and as an essential supplement to ongoing in-person support for others.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"656-664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144005395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An Evaluation Pilot Study of Amplify, a headspace-Inspired Early Intervention Clinic. 头部空间启发的早期干预诊所Amplify的评估试点研究。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240274
Deborah A Cohen, Vanessa V Klodnick, Laura Stevens Merola, Cory Morris, Kaleigh R Emerson, Stephen M Strakowski

Objective: The United States is experiencing a mental health crisis among youths and young adults. Most serious mental health conditions emerge during the transition to adulthood, and unmet mental health needs continue to rise among young adults. Following Australia's success with headspace, several countries are implementing integrated youth mental health programs, which warrant evaluation in the United States. The purpose of this study was to detail the service engagement, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Amplify integrated youth mental health clinic during its first year of operation.

Methods: The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School implemented Amplify in a community college setting. Participants completed online standardized self-report measures at enrollment and 60 and 180 days later. Staff recorded service delivery in an electronic health record. Data were analyzed for Amplify's first year of operation (January 1-December 31, 2023).

Results: During year 1, Amplify employed a program director, licensed clinical program manager, therapist, supported employment and education specialist, community navigator, part-time psychiatrist, and receptionist. Amplify delivered 1,308 services to 74 youths, 60 of whom consented to participate in the study. Most participated in two types of services. Mean±SD use per participant was 18±18 service units (i.e., sessions). Service satisfaction was high at 60 and 180 days. Mental distress significantly decreased from enrollment to 60 and to 180 days.

Conclusions: More research on Amplify is needed to further operationalize the model and demonstrate its value to U.S. public and private health care systems and payers.

目的:美国正在经历青年和青年成人的心理健康危机。最严重的心理健康状况出现在向成年过渡期间,未得到满足的心理健康需求在年轻人中继续增加。继澳大利亚在头部空间方面的成功之后,一些国家正在实施综合青少年心理健康项目,这需要美国进行评估。本研究的目的是详细描述Amplify综合青少年心理健康诊所在第一年运营期间的服务参与度、可接受性和初步结果。方法:德克萨斯大学奥斯汀戴尔医学院在社区大学环境中实施Amplify。参与者在入组时、60天和180天后完成了在线标准化自我报告。工作人员在电子健康档案中记录服务提供情况。分析了Amplify运营第一年(2023年1月1日至12月31日)的数据。结果:在第一年,Amplify聘请了一名项目主管、有执照的临床项目经理、治疗师、支持就业和教育专家、社区导航员、兼职精神科医生和接待员。Amplify为74名青少年提供了1308项服务,其中60人同意参与这项研究。大多数人参与了两种类型的服务。每位参与者的平均±SD使用量为18±18个服务单位(即疗程)。60天和180天的服务满意度较高。从入组到60天和180天,精神痛苦显著减少。结论:需要对Amplify进行更多的研究,以进一步实施该模型,并证明其对美国公共和私人医疗保健系统和支付者的价值。
{"title":"An Evaluation Pilot Study of Amplify, a headspace-Inspired Early Intervention Clinic.","authors":"Deborah A Cohen, Vanessa V Klodnick, Laura Stevens Merola, Cory Morris, Kaleigh R Emerson, Stephen M Strakowski","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240274","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240274","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The United States is experiencing a mental health crisis among youths and young adults. Most serious mental health conditions emerge during the transition to adulthood, and unmet mental health needs continue to rise among young adults. Following Australia's success with headspace, several countries are implementing integrated youth mental health programs, which warrant evaluation in the United States. The purpose of this study was to detail the service engagement, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Amplify integrated youth mental health clinic during its first year of operation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School implemented Amplify in a community college setting. Participants completed online standardized self-report measures at enrollment and 60 and 180 days later. Staff recorded service delivery in an electronic health record. Data were analyzed for Amplify's first year of operation (January 1-December 31, 2023).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During year 1, Amplify employed a program director, licensed clinical program manager, therapist, supported employment and education specialist, community navigator, part-time psychiatrist, and receptionist. Amplify delivered 1,308 services to 74 youths, 60 of whom consented to participate in the study. Most participated in two types of services. Mean±SD use per participant was 18±18 service units (i.e., sessions). Service satisfaction was high at 60 and 180 days. Mental distress significantly decreased from enrollment to 60 and to 180 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More research on Amplify is needed to further operationalize the model and demonstrate its value to U.S. public and private health care systems and payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"628-634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143754313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of On-Campus Student Mental Health Services at U.S. Colleges and Universities: A Web-Based Analysis. 美国大学校园学生心理健康服务的流行:基于网络的分析
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240479
James Aluri, Arman Terzian, Ramin Mojtabai, Amelia Arria

Objective: The authors sought to quantify the proportion of U.S. postsecondary institutions that offer any on-campus mental health services to their students.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data about the availability and descriptions of mental health services were gathered from websites of a main sample of 200 postsecondary institutions other than community colleges and a sample of 50 community colleges. Both samples were selected through a stratified sampling process. Descriptive statistics, weighted (main sample) and unweighted percentages, and confidence intervals were calculated.

Results: In the main sample, 191 institutions (95%, 95% CI=91%-98%) offered mental health services. Among community colleges, 40 (80%, 95% CI=69%-91%) offered such services. In both the main and community college samples, most institutions (92% and 75%, respectively) used "counseling" to describe the services offered.

Conclusions: Extrapolation of these results suggests that >1,700 U.S. postsecondary institutions offer mental health services, making campus services a sizeable mental health services sector.

目的:作者试图量化为学生提供任何校园心理健康服务的美国高等教育机构的比例。方法:采用横断面研究的方法,从200所社区学院以外的专上院校和50所社区学院的网站上收集有关心理健康服务的可用性和描述的数据。两个样本都是通过分层抽样过程选择的。计算描述性统计、加权(主样本)和未加权百分比以及置信区间。结果:在主要样本中,有191家机构(95%,95% CI=91% ~ 98%)提供心理健康服务。在社区学院中,有40所(80%,95% CI=69%-91%)提供此类服务。在主要学院和社区学院的样本中,大多数机构(分别为92%和75%)使用“咨询”来描述所提供的服务。结论:这些结果的外推表明,美国有超过1,700所大专院校提供心理健康服务,使校园服务成为一个相当大的心理健康服务部门。
{"title":"Prevalence of On-Campus Student Mental Health Services at U.S. Colleges and Universities: A Web-Based Analysis.","authors":"James Aluri, Arman Terzian, Ramin Mojtabai, Amelia Arria","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240479","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors sought to quantify the proportion of U.S. postsecondary institutions that offer any on-campus mental health services to their students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data about the availability and descriptions of mental health services were gathered from websites of a main sample of 200 postsecondary institutions other than community colleges and a sample of 50 community colleges. Both samples were selected through a stratified sampling process. Descriptive statistics, weighted (main sample) and unweighted percentages, and confidence intervals were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the main sample, 191 institutions (95%, 95% CI=91%-98%) offered mental health services. Among community colleges, 40 (80%, 95% CI=69%-91%) offered such services. In both the main and community college samples, most institutions (92% and 75%, respectively) used \"counseling\" to describe the services offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extrapolation of these results suggests that >1,700 U.S. postsecondary institutions offer mental health services, making campus services a sizeable mental health services sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"675-678"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Need Factors Associated With Adequate Depression Treatment Utilization Among U.S. Adolescents. 在美国青少年中与适当的抑郁症治疗利用相关的需求因素。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230644
Chuan Mei Lee, Carol P Wei, Charles E McCulloch, John C Fortney, Naomi S Bardach, Christina Mangurian

Objective: This study aimed to assess need factors associated with adequate treatment utilization among adolescents experiencing depression.

Methods: Nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008-2019) were analyzed via logistic regression. Predictors of adequate depression treatment utilization included household reporting of adolescents' mental health, functional impairment, and general medical health. Adequate treatment utilization was defined as four or more outpatient or office-based visits with an active antidepressant prescription or eight or more outpatient or office-based psychotherapy visits across 12 months.

Results: Of the 887 adolescents (ages 12-17) with depression identified, 276 (34% weighted) utilized adequate treatment. Adequate treatment utilization was positively associated with reports of adolescents' poor mental health and functional impairment (OR=1.69, p<0.001 and OR=1.43, p=0.004, respectively) and negatively associated with reports of adolescents' general medical health (OR=0.55, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Future interventions should include psychoeducation for caregivers in order to increase recognition of adolescents' mental health status and impairments.

目的:本研究旨在评估与青少年抑郁症治疗充分利用相关的需求因素。方法:采用logistic回归分析2008-2019年全国代表性医疗费用小组调查数据。抑郁症治疗充分利用的预测因子包括青少年心理健康、功能损害和一般医疗健康的家庭报告。充分的治疗利用被定义为在12个月内使用有效抗抑郁药物进行4次或以上门诊或办公室就诊,或8次或以上门诊或办公室心理治疗就诊。结果:在确定的887名患有抑郁症的青少年(12-17岁)中,276名(34%加权)接受了适当的治疗。充分的治疗利用与青少年不良心理健康和功能障碍的报告呈正相关(OR=1.69)。结论:未来的干预措施应包括对照顾者进行心理教育,以提高对青少年心理健康状况和功能障碍的认识。
{"title":"The Need Factors Associated With Adequate Depression Treatment Utilization Among U.S. Adolescents.","authors":"Chuan Mei Lee, Carol P Wei, Charles E McCulloch, John C Fortney, Naomi S Bardach, Christina Mangurian","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230644","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess need factors associated with adequate treatment utilization among adolescents experiencing depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2008-2019) were analyzed via logistic regression. Predictors of adequate depression treatment utilization included household reporting of adolescents' mental health, functional impairment, and general medical health. Adequate treatment utilization was defined as four or more outpatient or office-based visits with an active antidepressant prescription or eight or more outpatient or office-based psychotherapy visits across 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 887 adolescents (ages 12-17) with depression identified, 276 (34% weighted) utilized adequate treatment. Adequate treatment utilization was positively associated with reports of adolescents' poor mental health and functional impairment (OR=1.69, p<0.001 and OR=1.43, p=0.004, respectively) and negatively associated with reports of adolescents' general medical health (OR=0.55, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future interventions should include psychoeducation for caregivers in order to increase recognition of adolescents' mental health status and impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"679-683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143980260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recovery Is Working: Piloting Individual Placement and Support With Assertive Community Treatment Teams. 康复是有效的:试点个人安置和支持果断的社区治疗团队。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240221
Jacqueline A Pogue, Noah Lipton, I-Chin Chiang, Gary Scannevin, Tania Hameed, Helle Thorning, Paul J Margolies

Objective: Employment rates are low among individuals receiving assertive community treatment (ACT) services in New York State (9% of approximately 6,400 individuals in 2023). This project aimed to increase employment rates by implementing the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment within ACT services.

Methods: To assess the effectiveness of IPS for ACT participants and what adaptations might be needed, IPS was piloted with six ACT teams from October 2021 to October 2022. The teams received live IPS training and monthly consultation. They took part in pre-post fidelity assessments, provided monthly performance data, and engaged in semistructured interviews at the conclusion of the pilot.

Results: During the pilot, 109 ACT participants received IPS services. The monthly employment rate ranged from 25% to 46% and fluctuated over time. ACT participants receiving IPS started 71 jobs during the pilot. ACT teams demonstrated a culture shift that embraced employment and IPS principles such as zero exclusion. They dedicated a mean of 0.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) hours to providing IPS services, divided among one to six team members. The total IPS fidelity score increased (i.e., improved) by an adjusted mean of approximately 14 points from the start (77.5 points) to the end (91.8 points) of the pilot.

Conclusions: Future efforts to implement IPS within ACT teams may need to incorporate extended or additional supports and ways to dedicate vocational specialist time to IPS service provision in order to achieve better employment outcomes.

目标:纽约州接受果断社区治疗(ACT)服务的个人就业率很低(2023年约6400人中占9%)。该项目旨在通过实施ACT服务中支持就业的个人安置和支持(IPS)模式来提高就业率。方法:为了评估IPS对ACT参与者的有效性以及可能需要的适应性,从2021年10月到2022年10月,六个ACT团队对IPS进行了试点。这些团队接受了现场IPS培训和每月咨询。他们参加了前后保真度评估,提供了每月的表现数据,并在试点结束时进行了半结构化访谈。结果:在试点期间,109名ACT参与者接受了IPS服务。月就业率从25%到46%不等,并随时间波动。在试点期间,接受IPS的ACT参与者开始了71份工作。ACT团队展示了一种文化转变,接受了就业和IPS原则,如零排斥。他们平均投入0.5个全职当量(FTE)小时提供IPS服务,由1至6名团队成员分配。从飞行员开始(77.5分)到结束(91.8分),IPS保真度总分增加(即改善)了约14分。结论:未来在ACT团队中实施IPS的努力可能需要纳入扩展或额外的支持,以及将职业专家时间用于IPS服务提供的方法,以实现更好的就业结果。
{"title":"Recovery Is Working: Piloting Individual Placement and Support With Assertive Community Treatment Teams.","authors":"Jacqueline A Pogue, Noah Lipton, I-Chin Chiang, Gary Scannevin, Tania Hameed, Helle Thorning, Paul J Margolies","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240221","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Employment rates are low among individuals receiving assertive community treatment (ACT) services in New York State (9% of approximately 6,400 individuals in 2023). This project aimed to increase employment rates by implementing the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment within ACT services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of IPS for ACT participants and what adaptations might be needed, IPS was piloted with six ACT teams from October 2021 to October 2022. The teams received live IPS training and monthly consultation. They took part in pre-post fidelity assessments, provided monthly performance data, and engaged in semistructured interviews at the conclusion of the pilot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pilot, 109 ACT participants received IPS services. The monthly employment rate ranged from 25% to 46% and fluctuated over time. ACT participants receiving IPS started 71 jobs during the pilot. ACT teams demonstrated a culture shift that embraced employment and IPS principles such as zero exclusion. They dedicated a mean of 0.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) hours to providing IPS services, divided among one to six team members. The total IPS fidelity score increased (i.e., improved) by an adjusted mean of approximately 14 points from the start (77.5 points) to the end (91.8 points) of the pilot.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future efforts to implement IPS within ACT teams may need to incorporate extended or additional supports and ways to dedicate vocational specialist time to IPS service provision in order to achieve better employment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"642-648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144053723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline and Lifetime Suicidality and Risk Factors Among Pretrial Jail Detainees Enrolled in a Suicide Prevention Trial. 参与自杀预防试验的审前在押人员的基线和终生自杀及其危险因素。
IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240446
Sarah A Arias, Lauren M Weinstock, Manvinder Toor, Morgan Cinader, Gracie Schall, Gregory K Brown, Barbara Stanley, Jennifer E Johnson

Objective: Jail detention may be a marker of suicide risk in the community. This article aimed to describe the phenomenology of suicide risk, including lifetime suicidal behaviors and comorbid conditions, observed among individuals recruited into a suicide prevention trial who passed through pretrial jail detention before returning to the community.

Methods: Data on baseline characteristics of 800 adult participants from the SPIRIT (Suicide Prevention Intervention for At-Risk Individuals in Transition) study were analyzed.

Results: Half the participants reported a suicide attempt in the 30 days prior to study enrollment, 85% reported at least one lifetime suicide attempt, and (93%, N=743) reported any suicidal behavior in their lifetime. Most (85%) suicide attempts in the past 30 days were made in the community, prior to arrest. Participants had a mean±SD of 14.1±53.6 lifetime suicide attempts. One-third (34%) reported that their first attempt occurred when they were ≤10 years old. Comorbid conditions were common, with high rates of problematic substance use as well as symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress, psychosis, and mania.

Conclusions: Individuals passing through pretrial jail detention have a complex suicide risk profile that often includes addiction, serious mental illness, and long histories of suicidal behaviors. Because most of these individuals return to the community within days, effective postdetention suicide prevention services in the community are needed.

目的:监狱拘留可能是社区自杀风险的一个标志。本文旨在描述自杀风险的现象学,包括终身自杀行为和合并症,观察到在自杀预防试验中招募的个体,他们在返回社区之前经过审前监狱拘留。方法:对来自SPIRIT(高危个体自杀预防干预)研究的800名成年参与者的基线特征数据进行分析。结果:一半的参与者报告在研究入组前30天内有自杀企图,85%报告至少有一次自杀企图,(93%,N=743)报告在其一生中有任何自杀行为。在过去30天内,大多数(85%)自杀企图发生在被捕前的社区。参与者一生中有14.1±53.6次自杀企图。三分之一(34%)的人报告说,他们的第一次尝试发生在≤10岁时。合并症很常见,问题物质使用的比例很高,以及抑郁、创伤后应激、精神病和躁狂的症状。结论:经过审前拘留的个体具有复杂的自杀风险特征,通常包括成瘾、严重的精神疾病和长期的自杀行为史。由于这些人大多数在几天内返回社区,因此需要在社区提供有效的拘留后自杀预防服务。
{"title":"Baseline and Lifetime Suicidality and Risk Factors Among Pretrial Jail Detainees Enrolled in a Suicide Prevention Trial.","authors":"Sarah A Arias, Lauren M Weinstock, Manvinder Toor, Morgan Cinader, Gracie Schall, Gregory K Brown, Barbara Stanley, Jennifer E Johnson","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240446","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Jail detention may be a marker of suicide risk in the community. This article aimed to describe the phenomenology of suicide risk, including lifetime suicidal behaviors and comorbid conditions, observed among individuals recruited into a suicide prevention trial who passed through pretrial jail detention before returning to the community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on baseline characteristics of 800 adult participants from the SPIRIT (Suicide Prevention Intervention for At-Risk Individuals in Transition) study were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half the participants reported a suicide attempt in the 30 days prior to study enrollment, 85% reported at least one lifetime suicide attempt, and (93%, N=743) reported any suicidal behavior in their lifetime. Most (85%) suicide attempts in the past 30 days were made in the community, prior to arrest. Participants had a mean±SD of 14.1±53.6 lifetime suicide attempts. One-third (34%) reported that their first attempt occurred when they were ≤10 years old. Comorbid conditions were common, with high rates of problematic substance use as well as symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress, psychosis, and mania.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals passing through pretrial jail detention have a complex suicide risk profile that often includes addiction, serious mental illness, and long histories of suicidal behaviors. Because most of these individuals return to the community within days, effective postdetention suicide prevention services in the community are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"649-655"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144030757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of State Medical Licensure Exemptions and Telehealth Registries on College Students' Access to Psychiatric Care. 国家医疗执照豁免和远程医疗登记对大学生获得精神病学护理的影响。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240225
Rachel C Conrad, Amanda Koire, Lekshmi Radhakrishnan, Andrew Charroux, Savannah Klingler, Nicole M Benson, J Wesley Boyd

Objective: This study examined the impact of state medical licensure exemptions and telehealth registries on college students' access to psychiatric care.

Methods: The authors attempted to contact 901 psychiatrists who advertised online on Psychology Today by using a simulated patient, described as a student attending college in a state with a medical licensure exemption or telehealth registry.

Results: Contact was established with 282 (31%) psychiatrists across 10 states. Of the 143 contacted psychiatrists who were accepting new patients, seven (5%) were aware of state medical licensure exemptions, 43 (30%) were willing to establish care with students attending college in another state regardless of state laws, 42 (29%) were willing to learn about licensure exemptions, and 51 (36%) were unwilling to care for students in another state even when permitted by law.

Conclusions: Given psychiatrists' lack of awareness of licensure exemptions and telehealth registries, interstate access to and continuity of care may be limited.

目的:本研究探讨国家医师执照豁免和远程医疗登记对大学生获得精神科护理的影响。方法:作者试图联系901名精神科医生,这些精神科医生在《今日心理学》网站上做了在线广告,他们使用了一个模拟病人,这个病人被描述为在一个有医疗执照豁免或远程医疗注册的州上大学的学生。结果:与10个州的282名(31%)精神科医生建立了联系。在接受新患者的143名精神病医生中,7名(5%)知道州医疗执照豁免,43名(30%)愿意与在另一个州上大学的学生建立护理,无论州法律如何,42名(29%)愿意了解执照豁免,51名(36%)不愿意照顾在另一个州的学生,即使法律允许。结论:鉴于精神科医生缺乏对执照豁免和远程医疗登记的认识,州际间获得护理和护理的连续性可能受到限制。
{"title":"Impact of State Medical Licensure Exemptions and Telehealth Registries on College Students' Access to Psychiatric Care.","authors":"Rachel C Conrad, Amanda Koire, Lekshmi Radhakrishnan, Andrew Charroux, Savannah Klingler, Nicole M Benson, J Wesley Boyd","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240225","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the impact of state medical licensure exemptions and telehealth registries on college students' access to psychiatric care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors attempted to contact 901 psychiatrists who advertised online on <i>Psychology Today</i> by using a simulated patient, described as a student attending college in a state with a medical licensure exemption or telehealth registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contact was established with 282 (31%) psychiatrists across 10 states. Of the 143 contacted psychiatrists who were accepting new patients, seven (5%) were aware of state medical licensure exemptions, 43 (30%) were willing to establish care with students attending college in another state regardless of state laws, 42 (29%) were willing to learn about licensure exemptions, and 51 (36%) were unwilling to care for students in another state even when permitted by law.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given psychiatrists' lack of awareness of licensure exemptions and telehealth registries, interstate access to and continuity of care may be limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"602-605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Psychiatric Services Stands For. 精神科服务代表什么?
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-30 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20250186
Lisa B Dixon, Howard H Goldman, Deidre M Anglin, Daniel M Blonigen, Samuel J Dotson, Shalini Lal, David S Mandell, Christina Mangurian, Octavio N Martinez, Hunter L McQuistion, Mark Olfson, David W Oslin, Delbert Robinson, David Roe, Rebecca C Rossom, Jason Schiffman, Ruth Shim, Helene Speyer
{"title":"What <i>Psychiatric Services</i> Stands For.","authors":"Lisa B Dixon, Howard H Goldman, Deidre M Anglin, Daniel M Blonigen, Samuel J Dotson, Shalini Lal, David S Mandell, Christina Mangurian, Octavio N Martinez, Hunter L McQuistion, Mark Olfson, David W Oslin, Delbert Robinson, David Roe, Rebecca C Rossom, Jason Schiffman, Ruth Shim, Helene Speyer","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250186","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20250186","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"537-539"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144009552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenges to and Solutions for Implementing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers. 社区精神卫生中心实施阿片类药物使用障碍的挑战和解决方案。
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-27 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20240475
Sarah B Hunter, Allison J Ober, Barbara Levitan, Jonathan H Cantor

Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify implementation challenges to and solutions for integrating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) into community mental health centers (CMHCs).

Methods: Between February and July 2024, 17 semistructured interviews were conducted with CMHC program leaders. Participants described the impetus for MOUD provision or reasons for not implementing MOUD, as well as key implementation challenges and strategies to address them.

Results: Participants included staff from 10 CMHCs that provided MOUD and seven that did not. MOUD clinic staff noted that community need and leadership advocacy impelled them to offer MOUD, despite facing challenges. Reasons from non-MOUD clinic staff for not providing MOUD included a perceived lack of opioid use disorder among clients, concerns about treating people with opioid use disorder, and the need for appropriate staff and training. Implementation challenges identified by participants from MOUD clinics concerned the complexity or lack of reimbursement for MOUD-related services, lack of staff training and support, workflow misalignment, client nonadherence to MOUD, and medication costs. Several strategies were described to address these challenges, including streamlining workflows and pathways to treatment, increasing staff training and support, and leveraging telehealth.

Conclusions: Identifying implementation strategies that assist CMHCs in overcoming barriers to integrating MOUD can increase access in settings where people with co-occurring mental and opioid use disorders regularly receive care. This article provides illustrative examples of successful strategies used to address challenges faced by CMHCs and recommendations to increase MOUD uptake.

目的:本研究的目的是确定将阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)药物纳入社区精神卫生中心(CMHCs)的实施挑战和解决方案。方法:于2024年2月至7月对CMHC项目负责人进行了17次半结构化访谈。与会者描述了提供模式的动力或不实施模式的原因,以及实施模式的主要挑战和应对这些挑战的战略。结果:参与者包括来自10家提供mod的CMHCs和7家不提供mod的CMHCs的工作人员。mod诊所的工作人员指出,尽管面临挑战,社区的需求和领导的倡导促使他们提供mod。非mod诊所工作人员不提供mod的原因包括客户中缺乏阿片类药物使用障碍,对治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的担忧,以及需要适当的工作人员和培训。来自mod诊所的参与者确定的实施挑战涉及mod相关服务的复杂性或缺乏报销、员工培训和支持的缺乏、工作流程不一致、客户不遵守mod以及药物成本。与会者介绍了应对这些挑战的若干战略,包括简化工作流程和治疗途径,增加工作人员培训和支助,以及利用远程保健。结论:确定实施策略,帮助CMHCs克服整合mod的障碍,可以在同时发生精神和阿片类药物使用障碍的人经常接受治疗的环境中增加可及性。本文提供了用于解决CMHCs面临的挑战的成功策略的说明性示例,以及增加mod吸收的建议。
{"title":"Challenges to and Solutions for Implementing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Community Mental Health Centers.","authors":"Sarah B Hunter, Allison J Ober, Barbara Levitan, Jonathan H Cantor","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240475","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240475","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify implementation challenges to and solutions for integrating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) into community mental health centers (CMHCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and July 2024, 17 semistructured interviews were conducted with CMHC program leaders. Participants described the impetus for MOUD provision or reasons for not implementing MOUD, as well as key implementation challenges and strategies to address them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included staff from 10 CMHCs that provided MOUD and seven that did not. MOUD clinic staff noted that community need and leadership advocacy impelled them to offer MOUD, despite facing challenges. Reasons from non-MOUD clinic staff for not providing MOUD included a perceived lack of opioid use disorder among clients, concerns about treating people with opioid use disorder, and the need for appropriate staff and training. Implementation challenges identified by participants from MOUD clinics concerned the complexity or lack of reimbursement for MOUD-related services, lack of staff training and support, workflow misalignment, client nonadherence to MOUD, and medication costs. Several strategies were described to address these challenges, including streamlining workflows and pathways to treatment, increasing staff training and support, and leveraging telehealth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identifying implementation strategies that assist CMHCs in overcoming barriers to integrating MOUD can increase access in settings where people with co-occurring mental and opioid use disorders regularly receive care. This article provides illustrative examples of successful strategies used to address challenges faced by CMHCs and recommendations to increase MOUD uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"571-580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143721235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Formulary Restrictions for Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medications Among Medicare Drug Plans, 2019-2023. 2019-2023年医疗保险药物计划中长效注射抗精神病药物的处方限制趋势
IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230593
Samuel R Bunting, Robert O Cotes, Kathryn Gray, Kristen Chalmers, Thuy D Nguyen

Objective: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAPs) enable safe and effective long-term management of chronic psychotic disorders but are underused in clinical practice. The authors examined whether Medicare formulary restrictions (prior authorization [PA] or step therapy) impose barriers to LAIAP uptake.

Methods: The authors analyzed formulary restrictions and patient cost-sharing for several LAIAPs and estimated the percentage of plans (N=2,494 were available per year) applying formulary restrictions. Analyses were stratified by Medicare Advantage, dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility plans, and Part D plan group and weighted by the number of enrollees at the per-year, per-plan level.

Results: Application of formulary restrictions for LAIAPs was low (<12% requiring PA [apart from olanzapine] and <4% requiring step therapy) and decreased among nearly all plan types between 2019 and 2023.

Conclusions: Formulary restrictions do not appear to present a significant barrier to use of LAIAPs for psychiatric patients with Medicare prescription drug coverage. Additional research is needed to further understand factors influencing LAIAP use.

目的:长效注射抗精神病药物(LAIAPs)能够安全有效地长期治疗慢性精神障碍,但在临床实践中应用不足。作者检查了医疗保险的规定限制(事先授权[PA]或步骤治疗)是否对LAIAP的吸收造成障碍。方法:作者分析了几个laiap的处方限制和患者费用分担情况,并估计了适用处方限制的计划(N= 2494)的百分比。分析按医疗保险优势、双重医疗保险-医疗补助资格计划和D部分计划组进行分层,并按每年、每个计划水平的登记人数进行加权。结果:处方限制对LAIAPs的应用较低(结论:处方限制似乎并未对医疗保险处方药覆盖的精神病患者使用LAIAPs构成显著障碍)。需要进一步的研究来进一步了解影响LAIAP使用的因素。
{"title":"Trends in Formulary Restrictions for Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medications Among Medicare Drug Plans, 2019-2023.","authors":"Samuel R Bunting, Robert O Cotes, Kathryn Gray, Kristen Chalmers, Thuy D Nguyen","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230593","DOIUrl":"10.1176/appi.ps.20230593","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAPs) enable safe and effective long-term management of chronic psychotic disorders but are underused in clinical practice. The authors examined whether Medicare formulary restrictions (prior authorization [PA] or step therapy) impose barriers to LAIAP uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed formulary restrictions and patient cost-sharing for several LAIAPs and estimated the percentage of plans (N=2,494 were available per year) applying formulary restrictions. Analyses were stratified by Medicare Advantage, dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility plans, and Part D plan group and weighted by the number of enrollees at the per-year, per-plan level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Application of formulary restrictions for LAIAPs was low (<12% requiring PA [apart from olanzapine] and <4% requiring step therapy) and decreased among nearly all plan types between 2019 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formulary restrictions do not appear to present a significant barrier to use of LAIAPs for psychiatric patients with Medicare prescription drug coverage. Additional research is needed to further understand factors influencing LAIAP use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"606-610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143067252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychiatric services
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1