Psychiatric services最新文献

Implementing evidence-based practices has become a standard policy in U.S. behavioral health care. However, current penetration remains inadequate, and longitudinal studies of scaling up these practices are rare. This article examined the steady, 3-decade growth of individual placement and support (IPS), the evidence-based model of employment services for people with psychiatric disabilities. The number of IPS programs in the United States has increased to >1,000. Nevertheless, coverage remains limited, and challenges to further growth are substantial. Facilitators of IPS growth over the past few decades include client demand, scientific evidence, initial financial support from foundations, subsequent federal agency support, state leadership in behavioral health and vocational rehabilitation, standardized training and quality assurance methods, an international learning community, and the collection of national data to establish benchmarks. Challenges to further expansion of IPS include the complexity of multiple partial funding sources; the increasing use of information technology for training, implementation, and quality assurance; extension to new populations and settings; outreach to historically marginalized groups (e.g., young adults not engaged in the mental health system); employer partnerships; and adaptations related to cultural, workforce, and workplace changes. Developing reliable research methods to assess and compare scaling-up strategies is also critical.

Objective: The authors estimated associations between emergency dispatches initiated by Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) responders and use of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) behavioral health care in the following month.

Methods: The sample included 217,541 veterans with VCL contacts between 2017 and 2019 who could be linked with medical records. Models were weighted by a propensity score and stratified by VA behavioral health care use in the year preceding contact.

Results: Of veterans with emergency dispatches, 85.9% (weighted) with and 62.2% without prior use of VA behavioral health care accessed care in the month after dispatch. Dispatch receipt was associated with higher odds of psychiatric hospitalization for veterans with and those without prior VA behavioral health care use and of in-person outpatient behavioral health care use for veterans with prior use.

Conclusions: Efforts to link dispatch recipients who had not previously used VA behavioral health care to VA care are needed.

Objective: Time between the onset of psychosis and the start of treatment significantly influences outcomes. Rapid access to care is essential, yet barriers such as stigma, difficulties with navigating the mental health system, and financial constraints prolong this process. This mixed-methods study aimed to assess how these barriers affect participation in early psychosis services.

Methods: A directed content analysis of telephone log data was conducted from intake assessments at an early psychosis clinic. Stepwise logistic regression and analyses of variance were used to evaluate the impact of barriers on assessment completion and time from referral to assessment.

Results: Of 1,048 individuals screened for early psychosis services, 201 completed a telephone assessment. Individuals who dropped out had a higher proportion of barriers overall than did those who completed the assessment (p<0.01). Greater than 50% of interactions included at least one barrier, with logistical issues being the most common. Increased barriers were correlated with longer assessments and lower completion rates. Adults and Hispanic participants reported more barriers, compared with adolescents and non-Hispanic individuals, respectively. Significant contributors to nonengagement included unknown gender, public insurance, and various barriers.

Conclusions: Identifiable barriers to intake assessment were frequently reported by clients and were associated with higher intake noncompletion and a longer assessment process. Efforts to address logistical barriers may represent an essential step in improving the linkage process and reducing the duration of untreated psychosis.

Objective: In the context of increased uptake of flexible assertive community treatment (FACT)-despite a dearth of evidence on its outcomes-the authors aimed to compare the effectiveness of FACT with that of assertive community treatment (ACT) or intensive case management (ICM) for community-dwelling people experiencing serious mental illness.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study, using propensity score matching to minimize confounding factors, examined outcomes of acute psychiatric service use among individuals who received FACT (vs. ACT or ICM) at a large Canadian mental health hospital. Data from a period of transition to FACT and an implementation period were analyzed.

Results: The matched cohort consisted of 237 FACT and 237 ACT or ICM service users. During the transition period, no significant differences between the two groups were observed in emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, or inpatient days. During the period of full FACT implementation, the FACT group had a significant increase in ED visits, compared with the group that received ACT or ICM (incidence rate ratio=1.65, 95% CI=1.02-2.67), but no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the rate of hospital admissions or inpatient days.

Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first of its kind in Canada. Its findings suggest generally comparable outcomes of FACT (vs. ACT or ICM) in acute mental health services use. Although the rate of ED service use increased in the FACT group after implementation, inpatient service use did not increase. The higher rate of ED service use in the FACT group warrants further study.

Objective: To meet the demand for high-quality care, health care organizations are directing policy and care delivery toward person-centered care. Yet, knowledge of what patients value most in their encounters with the mental health care system is lacking. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the current evidence on patients' preferences during episodes of care within the mental health care system and to identify categories and subthemes of these preferences.

Methods: A comprehensive search of Embase, PubMed, and PsycInfo was conducted in accordance with the revised JBI methodology for scoping reviews. The literature review included studies of inpatients and outpatients (ages ≥18 years) with mental disorders. The primary concepts of interest were patients' preferences and priorities for mental health care services.

Results: Twenty-seven publications from the period 2000-2022 were included in the scoping review. Ten categories of patient preferences were identified: interactions with health care staff, involvement in care, diagnosis and symptom relief, interpersonal skills of health care staff, access and time, pharmacological treatment, coping and recovery, physical environment, information, and continuity of care. Interactions with health care staff, involvement in care, and diagnosis and symptom relief were most mentioned by patients as important aspects of care.

Conclusions: The scoping review highlighted the importance to patients of their interactions with health care staff. The results can be used to inform decision making for enhancement of person-centered care. Further research should include diagnosis-specific preferences, longitudinal study designs, and a systematic framework to assess patients' preferences.

Objective: The authors examined patterns in hospital admission rates for patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD)-related visit to an emergency department (ED).

Methods: The authors identified 116,928 ED visits for SSD across 1,071 hospitals in an 11-state sample drawn from the 2020 State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases. The distribution of hospital-level admission rates was described by using a finite mixture model. Hospital- and county-level characteristics were compared across hospitals with low, medium, or high SSD admission shares.

Results: Admission shares for patients with an SSD ED visit were highly variable and multimodal across hospitals. Although the overall mean admission share for patient ED visits with a primary SSD diagnosis was 56.6% (95% CI=53.0%-60.2%), the mean admission share was 5.6% (95% CI=4.8%-6.4%) in the lowest quintile and was 95.4% (95% CI=94.6%-96.3%) in the highest quintile. The presence of psychiatric beds in a hospital was associated with increased odds of admission (OR=2.56, 95% CI=1.83-3.59). A hospital's size, mental health visit volume, urbanicity, availability of psychiatric consultation, emergency mental health services, and outpatient mental health services, as well as county-level inpatient beds, were not significantly associated with admission rates.

Conclusions: Hospital admission rates for patients with an SSD ED visit varied widely, and the presence of inpatient psychiatric beds was positively associated with admission. These findings raise equity concerns by suggesting that variation in inpatient psychiatric bed availability contributes to ED disposition of patients with an SSD-related visit.

Across the globe, psychiatric illnesses are common, painful, often disabling, and sometimes deadly. Although well-researched practices exist to address these disorders, most people with psychiatric illnesses do not have access to care that has been demonstrated to be effective. Practical clinical leadership experience and engagement in evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation research in Colombia and the United States have demonstrated that multisite EBP implementation is possible and that effective implementation improves outcomes for people who develop psychiatric illnesses. Implementation requires financial and policy support but is effective only if onsite operational leaders actively overcome practical, sometimes site-specific barriers. Operational leaders have the greatest impact when they focus on changing the flow of work to help clinicians offer the desired EBP in their day-to-day care. Discovery science may bring new solutions in the future, but implementing practices that have already been demonstrated to be effective can relieve patients' suffering now.

Objective: Immigrants and persons with a non-English language preference (NELP) face unique challenges in the mental health care system. This systematic scoping review aimed to evaluate the literature for disparities in psychiatric care delivery, beyond access and utilization barriers, experienced by these two populations.

Methods: The authors queried four databases: PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Studies published between August 1993 and August 2023 were selected if they had a population that included immigrants to English-language countries or patients with a NELP and a mental illness, had a relevant comparison group, and included outcome measures focused on quality of psychiatric care delivery. Studies focusing solely on care access or utilization, studies without original data, case reports, and commentaries were excluded.

Results: The search identified 2,860 studies. Seventeen studies were included for full-text review (Cohen's κ=0.96). Large variability was found in the measures of quality used in the studies. Outcome variables were involuntary treatment rate, symptom management, unmet needs, medication use and monitoring, diagnosis, and psychiatric referral. Immigrants were more likely than nonimmigrants to receive involuntary treatments in all seven pertinent studies. An insufficient number of studies focused on other outcome measures, limiting analyses.

Conclusions: Many studies highlighted differences in care, especially with regard to involuntary hospitalization. Outcome measures varied and deviated from established quality metrics. Insufficient data were available to determine whether the identified differences in care represent a care delivery gap. Studies that use standardized measures would assist in evaluating the quality of care received by immigrants and patients with a NELP.