Pulmonary Therapy最新文献

Introduction: The use of oral anticancer medications has become more prevalent in cancer therapy. This is particularly the case in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, when the treatment delivery interaction between the patient and the healthcare provider is removed, the risk of non-adherence increases. Insights into patient preferences can allow drug product formulation scientists to design more patient-centric medications that may promote an increase in adherence which, in turn, may lead to more beneficial health outcomes.

Methods: We conducted an advisory board with patients with NSCLC in the United Kingdom to elicit and understand preferences for drug product attributes related to appearance, instructions, and modality. The advisory board was preceded by a quantitative preference survey that included three object-case best-worst scaling exercises and was followed by administering the same survey to a broader group of patients to confirm the results.

Results: Patients strongly prefer once-daily dosing over more frequent dosing, regardless of the number of pills because taking tablets or capsules multiple times each day can disrupt daily activities. In addition, patients place high importance on surface smoothness because a rough surface implies decreased swallowability. Finally, food restrictions involving directions regarding taking medication with or without food represent difficulties for patients with cancer. Results of the follow-up survey confirmed these results.

Conclusions: Drug developers should attempt to limit the dosing of these medications to once-daily regimens, avoid surface roughness, and develop formulations that can be taken without regard to the timing of meals to the greatest extent possible.

Introduction: There are limited real-world data on outcomes in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). This study assessed clinical characteristics and survival in patients with NCFBE by baseline exacerbation rate.

Methods: Patients with bronchiectasis (≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with a bronchiectasis diagnosis code, or one outpatient claim with bronchiectasis code and a chest computed tomography scan) were from the 100% Medicare Fee-for-Service database (Jan 2014-Dec 2020). Patients had continuous enrollment ≥ 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up), with index a random bronchiectasis claim preceded by ≥ 12 months bronchiectasis history. Patients with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Patients were stratified by exacerbations during baseline (0, 1, or ≥ 2). Follow-up exacerbation rate and all-cause mortality were assessed. Controls were identified using a multistep direct matching approach. Time to death from index was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: Exacerbation analysis included 92,529 patients with NCFBE and 92,529 matched controls. Exacerbations were common (43% had ≥ 1 exacerbation), with patients with more baseline exacerbations more likely to have ≥ 2 exacerbations during follow-up (11.4%, 24.2%, and 46.8% of patients with 0, 1, and ≥ 2 baseline exacerbations, respectively). Survival analysis included 110,298 patients with NCFBE and 110,298 controls. Time to death was shorter in patients with more baseline exacerbations (P < 0.0001). Five-year survival was 55.3%, 62.6%, and 65.4% for patients with ≥ 2, 1, and 0 baseline exacerbations, respectively, compared with 64.1% for controls.

Conclusions: In these patients with NCFBE, exacerbations were common. History of exacerbations was associated with future exacerbations and increased all-cause mortality.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) have a syndemic relationship with shared risk factors and complex interplay between genetic, environmental, socioeconomic, and pathophysiological mechanisms. CVD is among the most common comorbidities in patients with COPD and vice versa. Patients with COPD, irrespective of their disease severity, are at increased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality, driven in part by COPD exacerbations. Despite these known interrelationships, CVD is underestimated and undertreated in patients with COPD. Similarly, COPD is an independent risk-enhancing factor for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, yet it is not incorporated into current CV risk assessment tools, leading to under-recognition and undertreatment. There is a pressing need for systems change in COPD management to move beyond symptom control towards a comprehensive cardiopulmonary disease paradigm with proactive prevention of exacerbations and adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes and mortality. However, there is a dearth of evidence defining optimal cardiopulmonary care pathways. Fortunately, there is a precedent to support systems-level change in the field of diabetes, which evolved from glycemic control to comprehensive multi-organ risk assessment and management. Key elements included integrated multidisciplinary care, intensive risk factor management, coordination between primary and specialist care, care pathways and protocols, education and self management, and disease-modifying therapies. This commentary article draws parallels between the cardiometabolic and cardiopulmonary paradigms and makes a case for systems change towards multidisciplinary, integrated cardiopulmonary care, using the evolution in diabetes care as a potential framework.

Introduction: Ivacaftor (IVA) has been shown to change the trajectory of cystic fibrosis (CF) disease progression by slowing the rate of lung function decline in clinical studies. Long-term real-world data help to confirm the durability of this response.

Methods: This non-interventional, longitudinal study used data from the US CF Foundation Patient Registry to describe the annualized rate of change in lung function in people with CF receiving IVA. The IVA-treated cohort included people with CF aged ≥ 6 years who had ≥ 1 CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-gating mutation and initiated IVA between 31 January 2012 and 31 December 2018. An age-matched comparator cohort included people with CF heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and a minimal function mutation (R117H excluded) and had not received CFTR modulator therapy. Baseline characteristics were balanced using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weights computed from estimated propensity scores. The annualized rate of change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV₁) was estimated over 5 years and used to calculate the relative annualized rate of change in lung function in the IVA-treated versus comparator cohorts.

Results: In the 5-year follow-up period, 548 people were in the IVA-treated and 541 in the comparator cohorts after SMR weighting. The annualized rate of change in ppFEV₁ over 5 years was -1.23 (95% CI -1.45, -1.03) and -2.03 (-2.16, -1.90) percentage points in the IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively. There was a 39% reduction (95% CI: 28, 50) in the rate of lung function decline in the IVA-treated versus comparator cohort over 5 years. Findings were generally consistent with those of shorter follow-up periods.

Conclusion: IVA showed a durable clinical benefit by slowing the rate of lung function decline over 5 years. Results support a sustained and consistent impact of IVA on lung function trajectory in people with CF. Word count: 300 (limit: 300 words).

Introduction: Most hospitalized patients required invasive or non-invasive ventilation and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC). Therefore, this study was conducted to describe the characteristics of patients with severe Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) treated by HFNC and its effectiveness for reducing the rate of intubated-mechanical ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of Phu Chanh COVID-19 Department-Binh Duong General Hospital.

Methods: It was a cross-sectional and descriptive study. All severe patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure eligible for the study were included. Patient characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory results, and treatment methods were collected for analysis; parameters and data related to HFNC treatment and follow-up were analysed.

Results: 80 patients, aged of 49.7 ± 16.6 years, were treated with HFNC at admission in ICU. 14 patients had type 2 diabetes (17.5%), 3 patients had chronic respiratory disease (3.8%), 19 patients had high blood pressure (23.8%), and 5 patients with other comorbidities (7.4%). The majority of patients with severe COVID-19 had typical symptoms of COVID-19 such as shortness of breath (97.5%), intensive tired (81.3%), cough (73.7%), anosmia (48.3%), ageusia (41.3%), and fever (26.3%). The results of arterial blood gases demonstrated severe hypoxia under optimal conventional oxygen therapy (PaO₂ = 52.5 ± 17.4 mmHg). Respiratory rate, SpO2, PaO2 were significantly improved after using HFNC at 1st day, 3rd day and 7th day (P < 0.05; P < 0.05; P < 0.01; respectively). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) index was significantly increased after treating with HFNC vs before HFNC treatment (4.79 ± 1.86, 5.53 ± 2.39, and 7.41 ± 4.24 vs 2.97 ± 0.39; P < 0.05, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). 54 (67.5%) patients were success with HFNC treatment and 26 (32.5%) patients with HFNC failure needed to treat with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) (13 patients; 50%) or intubated ventilation (13 patients; 50%).

Conclusion: HFNC therapy could be considered as a useful and effective alternative treatment for patients with acute respiratory failure. HFNC might help to delay the intubated ventilation for patients with respiratory failure and to minimise the risk of invasive ventilation complications and mortality. However, it is crucial to closely monitor the evolution of patient's respiratory status and responsiveness of HFNC treatment to avoid unintended delay of intubation-mechanical ventilation.

Trial registration: An independent ethics committee approved the study (The Ethics Committee of Binh Duong General Hospital; No. HDDD-BVDK BINH DUONG 9.2021), which was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.

A severe and progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) known as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has an unknown etiology with poorly defined mechanisms of development. Among the currently prescribed pharmacological interventions for IPF, nintedanib demonstrates the ability to decelerate the deterioration of lung function and yield positive clinical outcomes. Multiple randomized placebo-controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and acceptable safety profile of nintedanib. Real-world evidence studies also support the use of nintedanib in IPF, being an efficient and well-tolerated treatment option. It has the potential to stabilize the disease progression in patients with ILD. Patients with IPF frequently have comorbidities like diabetes and hypertension, which can exacerbate the course of disease, reduce quality of life, and decrease treatment adherence. For well-informed decision-making, it is important for healthcare professionals to recognize the position of nintedanib therapy in IPF with comorbidities. The gastrointestinal adverse effects, notably diarrhea, dominate the nintedanib safety profile. These can be effectively controlled by closely monitoring side effects, administering anti-diarrheal and anti-emetic drugs, reducing the nintedanib dose, and discontinuing it in case of severe symptoms with an option to reintroduce the treatment after side effects subside. Symptomatic interventions and monitoring of liver enzymes may reduce the occurrence of permanent treatment discontinuations.

The coexistence of depression with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been associated with poorer outcomes. Studies have questioned the safety of antidepressants in patients with COPD. This review shows the potential relationships and the possible mechanisms and gives us good warnings on how to approach this problem. Treatment should be both non-pharmacological and pharmacological, but importantly tailored to the individual patient.

Introduction: Advances in development of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator (CFTRm) therapies mean that now people who are heterozygous (instead of having to be homozygous) for the common F508del variant can benefit from these therapies. Recent economic estimates suggest only approximately 15% of the global population have CFTRm access, yet it is unknown how prevalence of F508del and economic factors may affect this availability.

Methods: Data related to prevalence of cystic fibrosis (CF), CFTRm usage, and prevalence of F508del in 10 countries were extracted from publicly accessible registry reports from 2021. National gross domestic product (GDP) was obtained via open access World Bank data. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients assessed relationships.

Results: Notable discrepancies were noted in the equity of availability of data between national registries-only four countries reported number of patients eligible for CFTRm. Registry data represented 70,694 patients, with 42,858 found to be using CFTRm (60.6%). Prevalence of CFTRm usage ranged from 1.8% to 76.7% and prevalence of F508del ranged from 35.2% to 94.4%. The correlation between prevalence of CFTRm usage and F508del is positive (r = 0.56, p = 0.10), and the correlation between CFTRm usage and GDP (per capita) was also positive, and significant (r = 0.72, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Both F508del prevalence and GDP are associated with variable CFTRm usage rates, although a predominant reason is unclear as a result of poor consistency in registry reporting. Urgent action is needed to create uniform reporting of registry data and increase availability of novel CFTRm therapies to the global CF population.

Allergic rhinitis and asthma are commonly coexisting conditions, significantly impacting patient health and quality of life. Despite their interrelation, diagnosing allergic rhinitis in patients with asthma remains challenging, leading to underdiagnosis and suboptimal management. The expert consensus engaged a modified Delphi method involving 29 experts including pulmonologists, ear, nose, and throat surgeons, and allergologists. Through group discussions, consensus statements were developed regarding the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of allergic rhinitis and asthma. Final consensus statements were formulated based on the experts' collective clinical judgment and experience. This expert consensus provides updated recommendations tailored to the Indian context, addressing the gaps in existing research and clinical practice. By promoting a systematic and evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management, this consensus aims to support clinicians in effectively identifying and treating allergic rhinitis in patients with asthma, thereby improving overall disease management and patient well-being.

Introduction: The pathogenesis and clinical profiles of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) are poorly understood. Whether and to what extent pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-specific therapy improves hemodynamic and outcome in ILD-PH are also unknown.

Study objective: This study aims to clarify the characteristics, clinical course and response to PAH-specific therapy of ILD and/or PH by enrolling three unique subsets: PAH, ILD-PH, and ILD.

Methods: The proposed study is a retrospective and prospective, multi-centre, observational cohort study of patients treated at any of three university hospitals in the Hokkaido region of Japan who have any one of the following: PAH; ILD-PH with or without PAH features; or ILD without PH. We aim to enrol 250 patients in total. For the retrospective observation period, data obtained after 1 January 2010, will be analysed, and the prospective observation period will be 1 year. We will compare the clinical data of patients with ILD-PH with those of patients with PAH and those of patients with ILD without PH in the real-world clinical setting. In addition, within the cohort of patients with ILD-PH, we will explore the subset with "ILD-PH with PAH features" and compare the response to PAH-specific therapy with that of PAH. The primary outcome will be the change in pulmonary vascular resistance from first treatment to follow-up in patients with PAH and ILD-PH with PAH features (excluding ILD-PH without PAH feature and ILD-no-PH for the primary outcome). The exploratory outcomes will include analyses of PH-associated biomarkers, right ventricular function and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: This is a protocol article and the results will be presented after data collection is completed.

Conclusion: The POPLAR study will provide data that help better understand the pathophysiology of ILD-PH and improve the quality of life and outcome of patients with PH and/or ILD.

Trial registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT1010230018.