Quality Management in Health Care最新文献

Background and objectives: Burnout among physicians who work in primary care is an important problem that impacts health care quality, local communities, and the public's health. It can degrade the quality of primary care services in an area and exacerbate workforce shortages. This study conducted a review of the published research on burnout among family physicians working in the United States.

Methods: We used a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-guided approach and several article databases to identify, filter, and analyze published research on US family physician burnout that uses data collected from 2015 onward.

Results: Thirty-three empirical studies were identified with findings that included US family physician burnout prevalence and/or associations between burnout and specific personal and contextual drivers. Mean family physician burnout prevalence across studies that measured it was 35%. Almost half of the studies classified one-third or more of their family physician samples as burned out. Physician gender (being female), age (being younger), and job/work-related factors (workload, time pressures) were the most commonly identified correlates of family physician burnout. The vast majority of studies were cross-sectional and used secondary data.

Conclusions: The extant research literature on family physician burnout in the United States shows that burnout is currently a meaningful problem. Several important correlates of the problem can be identified, some of which managers and health care organizations can proactively address. Other correlates require managers and health care organizations also viewing family physicians in differentiated ways. The collective literature can be improved through a more consistent focus on similar burnout correlates across studies; inclusion of interventions aimed at lessening the effects of key burnout correlates; employment of more robust longitudinal and quasi-experimental research designs; and additional pandemic-era data collection on burnout.

Background and objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are associated with better postoperative recovery; however, evidence is lacking in liver cancer surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an ERAS pathway in US veterans undergoing liver cancer surgery.

Methods: We initiated an ERAS pathway for liver cancer surgery with preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions, which included a novel regional anesthesia technique, erector spinae plane block, for multimodal analgesia management. A retrospective quality improvement study was conducted with patients undergoing elective open hepatectomy or microwave ablation of liver tumors before and after ERAS pathway implementation.

Results: With 24 patients in the post-ERAS group and 23 patients in the pre-ERAS group, we found a significant decreased length of stay in the ERAS group (4.1 days ± 3.9) compared with traditional care (8.6 days ± 7.1, P = .01) and decreased perioperative opioid consumption including intraoperative opioids (post-ERAS 49.8 mg ± 28.5 vs pre-ERAS 98 mg ± 42.3, P = 4.1E-5), postoperative opioids (post-ERAS 65.3 mg ± 59.9 vs pre-ERAS 175.7 mg ± 210.6, P = .018), and patient-controlled analgesia requirements (post-ERAS 0% vs pre-ERAS 50%, P < .001).

Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS for liver cancer surgery in our veteran population translates into decreased length of stay and perioperative opioid consumption. Although this study is limited as a quality improvement project implemented at one institution with a small sample size, our results are clinically and statistically significant and sufficient to warrant further investigation into the efficacy of ERAS as the surgical needs of the US veteran population increase.

As medicine shifts to a value-based focus, health care providers in inpatient settings are actively seeking approaches to providing high-quality patient care without exacerbating prevailing cost burden. Complementary and integrative medicine may offer one potential solution for this challenge. Although the benefits of utilizing integrative practices in the inpatient setting have not been explored extensively thus far, early evidence demonstrates great promise of using integrative modalities to improve symptom burden in the inpatient setting while increasing patient pain satisfaction and reducing overall costs of care. Currently, social, educational, and financial barriers exist, limiting the widespread incorporation of complementary and integrative medicine into the inpatient setting. Nonetheless, a more robust body of literature demonstrating the effectiveness of complementary and integrative medicine in reducing costs of care and improving patient outcomes may help address these limitations and lead to the acceptance of integrative practices as the standard of high-value inpatient care.

Background and objectives: Ultrasound guidance has become standard of care in hospital medicine for invasive bedside procedures, especially central venous catheter placement. Despite ultrasound-guided bedside procedures having a high degree of success, only a few hospitalists perform them. This is because these are usually performed by radiologists or in the setting of trainee-run procedure teams. We sought to determine the impact of a non-trainee driven , hospitalist-run procedure service relative to time from consult to procedure.

Methods: The University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital (UAB), Department of Hospital Medicine, trained 8 non-trainee hospitalist physicians (from existing staff) to implement the ultrasound-guided procedure service. This study examines consult to procedure completion time since the implementation of the procedure service (2014 to 2020). Univariate analyses are used to analyze pre-implementation (2012-2014), pilot (2014-2016), and post-implementation data (2016-2018 initial, and 2018-2020 sustained).

Results: Results suggest a 50% reduction in time from consult to procedure completion when compared with the period before implementation of the nontrainee hospitalist procedure service.

Conclusions: A hospitalist procedure service, which does not include trainees, results in less time lag from consult to procedure completion time, which could increase patient satisfaction and improve throughput. As such, this study has wide generalizability to community hospitals and other nonacademic medical centers that may not have trainees.

Background and objectives: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is associated with significant morbidity. Our institution's POUR rate was elevated among patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery. We sought to demonstrate that our quality improvement (QI) intervention would significantly lower our POUR rate and length of stay (LOS).

Methods: A resident-led QI intervention was implemented from October 2017 to 2018 on 422 patients in an academically affiliated community teaching hospital. This consisted of standardized intraoperative indwelling catheter utilization, postoperative catheterization protocol, prophylactic tamsulosin, and early ambulation after surgery. Baseline data on 277 patients were collected retrospectively from October 2015 to September 2016. Primary outcomes were POUR and LOS. The focus, analyze, develop, execute, and evaluate (FADE) model was used. Multivariable analyses were used. P value <.05 was considered significant.

Results: We analyzed 699 patients (277 pre-intervention vs 422 post-intervention). The POUR rate (6.9% vs 2.6%, Δ confidence interval [CI] 1.15-8.08, P = .007) and mean LOS (2.94 ± 1.87 days vs 2.56 ± 2.2 days, Δ CI 0.066-0.68, P = .017) were significantly improved following our intervention. Logistic regression demonstrated that the intervention was independently associated with significantly decreased odds for developing POUR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, CI 0.17-0.83, P = .015). Diabetes (OR = 2.25, CI 1.03-4.92, P = .04) and longer surgery duration (OR = 1.006, CI 1.002-1.01, P = .002) were independently associated with increased odds of developing POUR.

Conclusions: After implementing our POUR QI project for patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, the institutional POUR rate significantly decreased by 4.3% (62% reduction) and LOS, by 0.37 days. We demonstrated that a standardized POUR care bundle was independently associated with a significant decrease in the odds of developing POUR.