Glyphosate is the most used herbicide globally. It is a unique non-selective herbicide with a mode of action that is ideal for vegetation management in both agricultural and non-agricultural settings. Its use was more than doubled by the introduction of transgenic, glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops. All of its phytotoxic effects are the result of inhibition of only 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), but inhibition of this single enzyme of the shikimate pathway results in multiple phytotoxicity effects, both upstream and downstream from EPSPS, including loss of plant defenses against pathogens. Degradation of glyphosate in plants and microbes is predominantly by a glyphosate oxidoreductase to produce aminomethylphosphonic acid and glyoxylate and to a lesser extent by a C-P lyase to produce sarcosine and phosphate. Its effects on non-target plant species are generally less than that of many other herbicides, as it is not volatile and is generally sprayed in larger droplet sizes with a relatively low propensity to drift and is inactivated by tight binding to most soils. Some microbes, including fungal plant pathogens, have glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS. Thus, glyphosate can benefit GR crops by its activity on some plant pathogens. On the other hand, glyphosate can adversely affect some microbes that are beneficial to agriculture, such as Bradyrhizobium species, although GR crop yield data indicate that such an effect has been minor. Effects of glyphosate on microbes of agricultural soils are generally minor and transient, with other agricultural practices having much stronger effects.
草甘膦是全球使用最多的除草剂。它是一种独特的非选择性除草剂,其作用模式非常适合农业和非农业环境中的植被管理。由于转基因抗草甘膦(GR)作物的出现,其使用量增加了一倍多。草甘膦的所有植物毒性作用仅是抑制 5-烯醇丙酮酰莽草酸-3-磷酸合成酶(EPSPS)的结果,但抑制莽草酸途径中的这一种酶会导致 EPSPS 上游和下游的多种植物毒性作用,包括植物失去抵御病原体的能力。草甘膦在植物和微生物中的降解主要是通过草甘膦氧化还原酶产生氨甲基膦酸和乙醛酸,其次是通过 C-P 裂解酶产生肌氨酸和磷酸盐。它对非目标植物物种的影响通常小于许多其他除草剂,因为它不具有挥发性,通常以较大的液滴喷洒,漂移倾向相对较低,而且会与大多数土壤紧密结合而失活。包括真菌植物病原体在内的一些微生物具有对草甘膦敏感的 EPSPS。因此,草甘膦对某些植物病原体的活性可使 GR 类作物受益。另一方面,草甘膦也会对某些对农业有益的微生物产生不利影响,例如 Bradyrhizobium 物种,尽管 GR 作物产量数据表明这种影响很小。草甘膦对农业土壤微生物的影响通常是轻微和短暂的,而其他农业做法的影响要大得多。
{"title":"Glyphosate: Uses Other Than in Glyphosate-Resistant Crops, Mode of Action, Degradation in Plants, and Effects on Non-target Plants and Agricultural Microbes.","authors":"Stephen O Duke","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_53","DOIUrl":"10.1007/398_2020_53","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glyphosate is the most used herbicide globally. It is a unique non-selective herbicide with a mode of action that is ideal for vegetation management in both agricultural and non-agricultural settings. Its use was more than doubled by the introduction of transgenic, glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops. All of its phytotoxic effects are the result of inhibition of only 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), but inhibition of this single enzyme of the shikimate pathway results in multiple phytotoxicity effects, both upstream and downstream from EPSPS, including loss of plant defenses against pathogens. Degradation of glyphosate in plants and microbes is predominantly by a glyphosate oxidoreductase to produce aminomethylphosphonic acid and glyoxylate and to a lesser extent by a C-P lyase to produce sarcosine and phosphate. Its effects on non-target plant species are generally less than that of many other herbicides, as it is not volatile and is generally sprayed in larger droplet sizes with a relatively low propensity to drift and is inactivated by tight binding to most soils. Some microbes, including fungal plant pathogens, have glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS. Thus, glyphosate can benefit GR crops by its activity on some plant pathogens. On the other hand, glyphosate can adversely affect some microbes that are beneficial to agriculture, such as Bradyrhizobium species, although GR crop yield data indicate that such an effect has been minor. Effects of glyphosate on microbes of agricultural soils are generally minor and transient, with other agricultural practices having much stronger effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"255 ","pages":"1-65"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/398_2020_53","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38913406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, commercially referred to as glyphosate-tolerant (GT), started the revolution in crop biotechnology in 1996. Growers rapidly accepted GR crops whenever they became available and made them the most rapidly adopted technology in agriculture history. Adoption usually meant sole reliance on glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, CAS No. 1071-83-6] for weed control. Not surprisingly, weeds eventually evolved resistance and are forcing growers to change their weed management practices. Today, the widespread dissemination of GR weeds that are also resistant to other herbicide modes-of-action (MoA) has greatly reduced the value of the GR crop weed management systems. However, growers continue to use the technology widely in six major crops throughout North and South America. Integrated chemistry and seed providers seek to sustain glyphosate efficacy by promoting glyphosate combinations with other herbicides and stacking the traits necessary to enable the use of partner herbicides. These include glufosinate {4-[hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl]-DL-homoalanine, CAS No. 51276-47-2}, dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid, CAS No. 1918-00-9), 2,4-D [2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, CAS No. 94-75-7], 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors, and other herbicides. Unfortunately, herbicide companies have not commercialized a new MoA for over 30 years and have nearly exhausted the useful herbicide trait possibilities. Today, glyphosate-based crop systems are still mainstays of weed management, but they cannot keep up with the capacity of weeds to evolve resistance. Growers desperately need new technologies, but no technology with the impact of glyphosate and GR crops is on the horizon. Although the expansion of GR crop traits is possible into new geographic areas and crops such as wheat and sugarcane and could have high value, the Roundup Ready® revolution is over. Its future is at a nexus and dependent on a variety of issues.
抗草甘膦(GR)作物(商业上称为耐草甘膦(GT))于 1996 年掀起了一场作物生物技术革命。只要有抗草铵膦作物,种植者就会迅速接受,并使其成为农业史上最迅速被采用的技术。采用这种技术通常意味着只能依靠草甘膦[N-(膦酰甲基)甘氨酸,化学文摘社编号 1071-83-6]来控制杂草。毫不奇怪,杂草最终产生了抗药性,迫使种植者改变杂草管理方法。如今,对其他除草剂作用方式(MoA)也产生抗性的 GR 杂草的广泛传播,大大降低了 GR 作物杂草管理系统的价值。不过,种植者仍在北美和南美的六种主要作物上广泛使用该技术。综合化学和种子供应商通过推广草甘膦与其他除草剂的组合以及堆叠使用伙伴除草剂所需的性状,力求维持草甘膦的功效。这些除草剂包括草铵膦{4-[羟基(甲基)膦酰基]-DL-高丙氨酸,化学文摘社编号:51276-47-2}、麦草畏(3,6-二氯-2-甲氧基苯甲酸,化学文摘社编号:CAS No.1918-00-9)、2,4-D [2-(2,4-二氯苯氧基)乙酸,化学文摘社编号 94-75-7]、4-羟基苯基丙酮酸二氧酶抑制剂、乙酰辅酶 A 羧化酶(ACCase)抑制剂和其他除草剂。遗憾的是,除草剂公司 30 多年来一直没有将新的 MoA 商业化,几乎耗尽了有用除草剂性状的可能性。如今,以草甘膦为基础的作物系统仍然是杂草管理的主流,但它们无法跟上杂草的抗药性进化能力。种植者亟需新技术,但目前还没有任何技术能达到草甘膦和 GR 作物的效果。尽管 GR 作物性状有可能扩展到新的地理区域和作物,如小麦和甘蔗,并可能具有很高的价值,但 Roundup Ready® 革命已经结束。它的未来取决于各种问题。
{"title":"History and Outlook for Glyphosate-Resistant Crops.","authors":"Jerry M Green, Daniel L Siehl","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_54","DOIUrl":"10.1007/398_2020_54","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, commercially referred to as glyphosate-tolerant (GT), started the revolution in crop biotechnology in 1996. Growers rapidly accepted GR crops whenever they became available and made them the most rapidly adopted technology in agriculture history. Adoption usually meant sole reliance on glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, CAS No. 1071-83-6] for weed control. Not surprisingly, weeds eventually evolved resistance and are forcing growers to change their weed management practices. Today, the widespread dissemination of GR weeds that are also resistant to other herbicide modes-of-action (MoA) has greatly reduced the value of the GR crop weed management systems. However, growers continue to use the technology widely in six major crops throughout North and South America. Integrated chemistry and seed providers seek to sustain glyphosate efficacy by promoting glyphosate combinations with other herbicides and stacking the traits necessary to enable the use of partner herbicides. These include glufosinate {4-[hydroxy(methyl)phosphinoyl]-DL-homoalanine, CAS No. 51276-47-2}, dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid, CAS No. 1918-00-9), 2,4-D [2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, CAS No. 94-75-7], 4-hydroxyphenyl pyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors, and other herbicides. Unfortunately, herbicide companies have not commercialized a new MoA for over 30 years and have nearly exhausted the useful herbicide trait possibilities. Today, glyphosate-based crop systems are still mainstays of weed management, but they cannot keep up with the capacity of weeds to evolve resistance. Growers desperately need new technologies, but no technology with the impact of glyphosate and GR crops is on the horizon. Although the expansion of GR crop traits is possible into new geographic areas and crops such as wheat and sugarcane and could have high value, the Roundup Ready® revolution is over. Its future is at a nexus and dependent on a variety of issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"255 ","pages":"67-91"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39078475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Freshwater and marine water bodies receive chemical contaminants from industrial, agricultural, urban, and domestic wastes. Eco-genotoxicity assays are useful tools to assess the cumulative genotoxicity of these pollutants. Fish are suitable indicators for biomonitoring of mutagenic and carcinogenic pollution.In this review, we present a complete overview of the studies performed so far using the micronucleus test in peripheral erythrocytes of fish exposed to polluted water. We have listed all the species of fish used and the geographical distribution of the investigations. We have analyzed and discussed all technical aspects of using this test in fish, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the different experimental protocols. We have reported the results of all studies. This assay has become, for years, one of the simplest, fastest, and most cost-effective for assessing genotoxic risk in aquatic environments. However, there are still several factors influencing the variability of the results. Therefore, we have given indications and suggestions to achieve a standardization of experimental procedures and ensure uniformity of future investigations.
{"title":"Micronuclei in Fish Erythrocytes as Genotoxic Biomarkers of Water Pollution: An Overview.","authors":"Francesco D'Agostini, Sebastiano La Maestra","doi":"10.1007/398_2021_76","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2021_76","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Freshwater and marine water bodies receive chemical contaminants from industrial, agricultural, urban, and domestic wastes. Eco-genotoxicity assays are useful tools to assess the cumulative genotoxicity of these pollutants. Fish are suitable indicators for biomonitoring of mutagenic and carcinogenic pollution.In this review, we present a complete overview of the studies performed so far using the micronucleus test in peripheral erythrocytes of fish exposed to polluted water. We have listed all the species of fish used and the geographical distribution of the investigations. We have analyzed and discussed all technical aspects of using this test in fish, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the different experimental protocols. We have reported the results of all studies. This assay has become, for years, one of the simplest, fastest, and most cost-effective for assessing genotoxic risk in aquatic environments. However, there are still several factors influencing the variability of the results. Therefore, we have given indications and suggestions to achieve a standardization of experimental procedures and ensure uniformity of future investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"258 ","pages":"195-240"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39488160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Julie C Anderson, Sarah C Marteinson, Ryan S Prosser
Pesticides can enter aquatic environments via direct application, via overspray or drift during application, or by runoff or leaching from fields during rain events, where they can have unintended effects on non-target aquatic biota. As such, Fisheries and Oceans Canada identified a need to prioritize current-use pesticides based on potential risks towards fish, their prey species, and habitats in Canada. A literature review was conducted to: (1) Identify current-use pesticides of concern for Canadian marine and freshwater environments based on use and environmental presence in Canada, (2) Outline current knowledge on the biological effects of the pesticides of concern, and (3) Identify general data gaps specific to biological effects of pesticides on aquatic species. Prioritization was based upon recent sales data, measured concentrations in Canadian aquatic environments between 2000 and 2020, and inherent toxicity as represented by aquatic guideline values. Prioritization identified 55 pesticides for further research nationally. Based on rank, a sub-group of seven were chosen as the top-priority pesticides, including three herbicides (atrazine, diquat, and S-metolachlor), three insecticides (chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, and permethrin), and one fungicide (chlorothalonil). A number of knowledge gaps became apparent through this process, including gaps in our understanding of sub-lethal toxicity, environmental fate, species sensitivity distributions, and/or surface water concentrations for each of the active ingredients reviewed. More generally, we identified a need for more baseline fish and fish habitat data, ongoing environmental monitoring, development of marine and sediment-toxicity benchmarks, improved study design including sufficiently low method detection limits, and collaboration around accessible data reporting and management.
{"title":"Prioritization of Pesticides for Assessment of Risk to Aquatic Ecosystems in Canada and Identification of Knowledge Gaps.","authors":"Julie C Anderson, Sarah C Marteinson, Ryan S Prosser","doi":"10.1007/398_2021_81","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2021_81","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pesticides can enter aquatic environments via direct application, via overspray or drift during application, or by runoff or leaching from fields during rain events, where they can have unintended effects on non-target aquatic biota. As such, Fisheries and Oceans Canada identified a need to prioritize current-use pesticides based on potential risks towards fish, their prey species, and habitats in Canada. A literature review was conducted to: (1) Identify current-use pesticides of concern for Canadian marine and freshwater environments based on use and environmental presence in Canada, (2) Outline current knowledge on the biological effects of the pesticides of concern, and (3) Identify general data gaps specific to biological effects of pesticides on aquatic species. Prioritization was based upon recent sales data, measured concentrations in Canadian aquatic environments between 2000 and 2020, and inherent toxicity as represented by aquatic guideline values. Prioritization identified 55 pesticides for further research nationally. Based on rank, a sub-group of seven were chosen as the top-priority pesticides, including three herbicides (atrazine, diquat, and S-metolachlor), three insecticides (chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, and permethrin), and one fungicide (chlorothalonil). A number of knowledge gaps became apparent through this process, including gaps in our understanding of sub-lethal toxicity, environmental fate, species sensitivity distributions, and/or surface water concentrations for each of the active ingredients reviewed. More generally, we identified a need for more baseline fish and fish habitat data, ongoing environmental monitoring, development of marine and sediment-toxicity benchmarks, improved study design including sufficiently low method detection limits, and collaboration around accessible data reporting and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"259 ","pages":"171-231"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39500190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dissolved organic matter (DOM), a type of mixture containing complex structures and interactions, has important effects on environmental processes such as the complexation and interface reactions of soil heavy metals. Furthermore, microbial dissimilatory iron reduction (DIR), a key process of soil biogeochemical cycle, is closely related to the migration and transformation of heavy metals and causes the release of DOM by carbon-ferrihydrite associations. This chapter considers the structural properties and characterization techniques of DOM and its interaction with microbial dissimilated iron. The effect of DOM on microbial DIR is specifically manifested as driving force properties, coprecipitation, complexation, and electronic shuttle properties. The study, in addition, further explored the influence of pH, microorganisms, salinity, and light conditions, mechanism of DOM and microbial DIR on the toxicity and bioavailability of different heavy metals. The action mechanism of these factors on heavy metals can be summarized as adsorption coprecipitation, methylation, and redox. Based on the findings of the review, future research is expected to focus on: (1) The combination of DOM functional group structure analysis with high-resolution mass spectrometry technology and electrochemical methods to determine the electron supply in the mechanism of DOM action on DIR; (2) Impact of DOM on differences in structure and functions of plant rhizosphere in heavy metal contaminated soil; and (3) Bioavailability of DOM-dissociative iron-reducing bacteria-heavy metal ternary binding on rhizosphere heavy metals under dynamic changes of water level from the perspective of the differences in DOM properties, such as polarity, molecular weight, and functional group.
{"title":"Effects of Dissolved Organic Matter on the Bioavailability of Heavy Metals During Microbial Dissimilatory Iron Reduction: A Review.","authors":"Yuanhang Li, Xiaofeng Gong","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_63","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_63","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissolved organic matter (DOM), a type of mixture containing complex structures and interactions, has important effects on environmental processes such as the complexation and interface reactions of soil heavy metals. Furthermore, microbial dissimilatory iron reduction (DIR), a key process of soil biogeochemical cycle, is closely related to the migration and transformation of heavy metals and causes the release of DOM by carbon-ferrihydrite associations. This chapter considers the structural properties and characterization techniques of DOM and its interaction with microbial dissimilated iron. The effect of DOM on microbial DIR is specifically manifested as driving force properties, coprecipitation, complexation, and electronic shuttle properties. The study, in addition, further explored the influence of pH, microorganisms, salinity, and light conditions, mechanism of DOM and microbial DIR on the toxicity and bioavailability of different heavy metals. The action mechanism of these factors on heavy metals can be summarized as adsorption coprecipitation, methylation, and redox. Based on the findings of the review, future research is expected to focus on: (1) The combination of DOM functional group structure analysis with high-resolution mass spectrometry technology and electrochemical methods to determine the electron supply in the mechanism of DOM action on DIR; (2) Impact of DOM on differences in structure and functions of plant rhizosphere in heavy metal contaminated soil; and (3) Bioavailability of DOM-dissociative iron-reducing bacteria-heavy metal ternary binding on rhizosphere heavy metals under dynamic changes of water level from the perspective of the differences in DOM properties, such as polarity, molecular weight, and functional group.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"257 ","pages":"69-92"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38973068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Feeding Behavioural Studies with Freshwater Gammarus spp.: The Importance of a Standardised Methodology.","authors":"Giulia Consolandi, Alex T Ford, Michelle C Bloor","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_45","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"253 ","pages":"207"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/398_2020_45","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38027845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yousoon Baek, Lucas K Bobadilla, Darci A Giacomini, Jacob S Montgomery, Brent P Murphy, Patrick J Tranel
Widespread adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant reliance on glyphosate for weed control set an unprecedented stage for the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. There are now 48 weed species that have evolved glyphosate resistance. Diverse glyphosate-resistance mechanisms have evolved, including single, double, and triple amino acid substitutions in the target-site gene, duplication of the gene encoding the target site, and others that are rare or nonexistent for evolved resistance to other herbicides. This review summarizes these resistance mechanisms, discusses what is known about their evolution, and concludes with some of the impacts glyphosate-resistant weeds have had on weed management.
{"title":"Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds.","authors":"Yousoon Baek, Lucas K Bobadilla, Darci A Giacomini, Jacob S Montgomery, Brent P Murphy, Patrick J Tranel","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_55","DOIUrl":"10.1007/398_2020_55","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Widespread adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops and concomitant reliance on glyphosate for weed control set an unprecedented stage for the evolution of herbicide-resistant weeds. There are now 48 weed species that have evolved glyphosate resistance. Diverse glyphosate-resistance mechanisms have evolved, including single, double, and triple amino acid substitutions in the target-site gene, duplication of the gene encoding the target site, and others that are rare or nonexistent for evolved resistance to other herbicides. This review summarizes these resistance mechanisms, discusses what is known about their evolution, and concludes with some of the impacts glyphosate-resistant weeds have had on weed management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"255 ","pages":"93-128"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/398_2020_55","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38936974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The concept of Ecotoxicological Species Sensitivity Distributions, as used in EU and US, to derive environmental standards for contaminants, starts from the assumption that by protecting the majority of species (95% confidence interval) all species will be protected. Nevertheless, 5% of the species outside the confidence interval might become harmed; half of it being the most sensitive for the particular compound tested. With respect to protection of rare endemic species it is not clear, however, if contamination is a driving factor for endemicity. The aim of this paper is to explore whether endemic and rare species deserve extra protection from adverse environmental conditions. To this end, a brief overview of the various forms of endemism, their relation to environmental stress factors and the distribution of endemic species is discussed. Further, the sensitivities of these species towards environmental stress factors are analysed, in order to conclude if and how endemic species could be better protected against environmental stress factors. This was achieved by specifically focusing on the potential impacts of metalliferous soils, mining, the treatment of mined soil and the storage of treated mine waste. It is concluded that at present there are some signals about specific sensitivities, but the database is much too small for a definite conclusion about adverse environmental factors as a threat to endemic species. The data gap has to be filled in with experimental tests with endemic species. This is hampered by the protection status of these endemic, rare species. Recommendations and derived activities are proposed to address this.
生态毒理学物种敏感性分布(Ecotoxicological Species Sensitivity distribution)的概念被欧盟和美国用来推导污染物的环境标准,其出发点是假设通过保护大多数物种(95%置信区间),所有物种都将得到保护。然而,在置信区间外,5%的物种可能会受到伤害;其中一半是对特定化合物最敏感的。然而,在保护稀有地方性物种方面,尚不清楚污染是否是地方性的驱动因素。本文的目的是探讨在不利的环境条件下,特有和稀有物种是否应该得到额外的保护。为此,本文简要介绍了各种形式的特有种,它们与环境胁迫因子的关系以及特有种的分布。此外,还分析了这些物种对环境应激因子的敏感性,以确定是否以及如何更好地保护特有物种免受环境应激因子的影响。这是通过特别注重含金属土壤、采矿、开采土壤的处理和处理后的矿山废物的储存的潜在影响来实现的。结论是,目前有一些关于特定敏感性的信号,但数据库太小,无法确定不利环境因素是否对特有物种构成威胁。必须用特有物种的实验测试来填补数据空白。这些地方性稀有物种的保护状况阻碍了这一进程。为此提出了建议和衍生活动。
{"title":"Do Endemic Soil Fauna Species Deserve Extra Protection for Adverse Heavy Metal Conditions?","authors":"Herman Eijsackers, Mark Maboeta","doi":"10.1007/398_2021_72","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2021_72","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of Ecotoxicological Species Sensitivity Distributions, as used in EU and US, to derive environmental standards for contaminants, starts from the assumption that by protecting the majority of species (95% confidence interval) all species will be protected. Nevertheless, 5% of the species outside the confidence interval might become harmed; half of it being the most sensitive for the particular compound tested. With respect to protection of rare endemic species it is not clear, however, if contamination is a driving factor for endemicity. The aim of this paper is to explore whether endemic and rare species deserve extra protection from adverse environmental conditions. To this end, a brief overview of the various forms of endemism, their relation to environmental stress factors and the distribution of endemic species is discussed. Further, the sensitivities of these species towards environmental stress factors are analysed, in order to conclude if and how endemic species could be better protected against environmental stress factors. This was achieved by specifically focusing on the potential impacts of metalliferous soils, mining, the treatment of mined soil and the storage of treated mine waste. It is concluded that at present there are some signals about specific sensitivities, but the database is much too small for a definite conclusion about adverse environmental factors as a threat to endemic species. The data gap has to be filled in with experimental tests with endemic species. This is hampered by the protection status of these endemic, rare species. Recommendations and derived activities are proposed to address this.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"258 ","pages":"55-71"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39384619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Guoxiang You, Jun Hou, Yi Xu, Lingzhan Miao, Yanhui Ao, Baoshan Xing
Increasing production and utilization of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNPs) in recent years have raised wide concerns about their toxicity. Numerous studies have been conducted to reveal the toxicity of CNPs, but the results are sometimes contradictory. In this review, the most important factors in mediating CNPs toxicity are discussed, including (1) the roles of physicochemical properties (size, morphology, agglomeration condition, surface charge, coating and surface valence state) on CNPs toxicity; (2) the phase transfer and transformation process of CNPs in various aqueous, terrestrial, and airborne environments; and (3) reductive dissolution of CNPs core and their chemical reactions with phosphate, sulfate/S2-, and ferrous ions. The physicochemical properties play key roles in the interactions of CNPs with organisms and consequently their environmental transformations, reactivity and toxicity assessment. Also, the speciation transformations of CNPs caused by reactions with (in)organic ligands in both environmental and biological systems would further alter their fate, transport, and toxicity potential. Thus, the toxicity mechanisms are proposed based on the physical damage of direct adsorption of CNPs onto the cell membrane and chemical inhibition (including oxidative stress and interaction of CNPs with biomacromolecules). Finally, the current knowledge gaps and further research needs in identifying the toxicological risk factors of CNPs under realistic environmental conditions are highlighted, which might improve predictions about their potential environmental influences. This review aims to provide new insights into cost-effectiveness of control options and management practices to prevent environmental risks from CNPs exposure.
{"title":"Surface Properties and Environmental Transformations Controlling the Bioaccumulation and Toxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: A Critical Review.","authors":"Guoxiang You, Jun Hou, Yi Xu, Lingzhan Miao, Yanhui Ao, Baoshan Xing","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_42","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increasing production and utilization of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CNPs) in recent years have raised wide concerns about their toxicity. Numerous studies have been conducted to reveal the toxicity of CNPs, but the results are sometimes contradictory. In this review, the most important factors in mediating CNPs toxicity are discussed, including (1) the roles of physicochemical properties (size, morphology, agglomeration condition, surface charge, coating and surface valence state) on CNPs toxicity; (2) the phase transfer and transformation process of CNPs in various aqueous, terrestrial, and airborne environments; and (3) reductive dissolution of CNPs core and their chemical reactions with phosphate, sulfate/S<sup>2-</sup>, and ferrous ions. The physicochemical properties play key roles in the interactions of CNPs with organisms and consequently their environmental transformations, reactivity and toxicity assessment. Also, the speciation transformations of CNPs caused by reactions with (in)organic ligands in both environmental and biological systems would further alter their fate, transport, and toxicity potential. Thus, the toxicity mechanisms are proposed based on the physical damage of direct adsorption of CNPs onto the cell membrane and chemical inhibition (including oxidative stress and interaction of CNPs with biomacromolecules). Finally, the current knowledge gaps and further research needs in identifying the toxicological risk factors of CNPs under realistic environmental conditions are highlighted, which might improve predictions about their potential environmental influences. This review aims to provide new insights into cost-effectiveness of control options and management practices to prevent environmental risks from CNPs exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"253 ","pages":"155-206"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/398_2020_42","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37980931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heavy metal (HM) contamination is a serious global environmental crisis. Over the past decade, industrial effluents, modern agricultural practices, and other anthropogenic activities have significantly depleted the soil environment. In plants, metal toxicity leads to compromised growth, development, productivity, and yield. Also, HMs negatively affect human health due to food chain contamination. Thus, it is imperative to reduce metal accumulation and toxicity. In nature, certain plant species exhibit an inherent capacity of amassing large amounts of HMs with remarkable tolerance. These plants with unique characteristics can be employed for the remediation of contaminated soil and water. Among different plant species, Sorghum bicolor has the potential of accumulating huge amounts of HMs, thus could be regarded as a hyperaccumulator. This means that it is a metal tolerant, high biomass producing energy crop, and thus can be utilized for phytoremediation. However, high concentrations of HMs hamper plant height, root hair density, shoot biomass, number of leaves, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and carbohydrate content. Thus, understanding the response of Sorghum towards different HMs holds considerable importance. Considering this, we have uncovered the basic information about the metal uptake, translocation, and accumulation in Sorghum. Plants respond to different HMs via sensing, signaling, and modulations in physico-chemical processes. Therefore, in this review, a glimpse of HM toxicity and the response of Sorghum at the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels has been provided. The review highlights the future research needs and emphasizes the extensive molecular dissection of Sorghum to explore its genetic adaptability towards different abiotic stresses that can be exploited to develop resilient crop varieties.
{"title":"An Overview of Morpho-Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Responses of Sorghum Towards Heavy Metal Stress.","authors":"Dewanshi Mishra, Smita Kumar, Bhartendu Nath Mishra","doi":"10.1007/398_2020_61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2020_61","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heavy metal (HM) contamination is a serious global environmental crisis. Over the past decade, industrial effluents, modern agricultural practices, and other anthropogenic activities have significantly depleted the soil environment. In plants, metal toxicity leads to compromised growth, development, productivity, and yield. Also, HMs negatively affect human health due to food chain contamination. Thus, it is imperative to reduce metal accumulation and toxicity. In nature, certain plant species exhibit an inherent capacity of amassing large amounts of HMs with remarkable tolerance. These plants with unique characteristics can be employed for the remediation of contaminated soil and water. Among different plant species, Sorghum bicolor has the potential of accumulating huge amounts of HMs, thus could be regarded as a hyperaccumulator. This means that it is a metal tolerant, high biomass producing energy crop, and thus can be utilized for phytoremediation. However, high concentrations of HMs hamper plant height, root hair density, shoot biomass, number of leaves, chlorophyll, carotenoid, and carbohydrate content. Thus, understanding the response of Sorghum towards different HMs holds considerable importance. Considering this, we have uncovered the basic information about the metal uptake, translocation, and accumulation in Sorghum. Plants respond to different HMs via sensing, signaling, and modulations in physico-chemical processes. Therefore, in this review, a glimpse of HM toxicity and the response of Sorghum at the morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels has been provided. The review highlights the future research needs and emphasizes the extensive molecular dissection of Sorghum to explore its genetic adaptability towards different abiotic stresses that can be exploited to develop resilient crop varieties.</p>","PeriodicalId":21182,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology","volume":"256 ","pages":"155-177"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/398_2020_61","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38884380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}