Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-17DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4195
Elizabeth Trejos-Castillo, Ann Mastergeorge, Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Vinicius Oliveira Santana, André Zugman, Célia Maria de Araújo, Pedro Mario Pan, Felipe Picon, Luis Augusto Paim Rohde, Andrea P Jackowski
Objective: This study examined the effects of socioeconomic status as a possible moderator of the effects of family conflict on externalizing/internalizing behavior and hippocampal and amygdala volume.
Methods: A longitudinal complete-case analysis of 714 children and adolescents (mean age: 11.2 years; 46.2% female) was conducted using data from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Psychiatric Disorders in Childhood. At baseline, parents/guardians completed the Family Environment Scale and a socioeconomic status scale. Three years after baseline assessment, the same participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, and the Child Behavior Checklist was administered. Automated segmentation of the amygdala and hippocampus was performed in FreeSurfer 5.1.
Results: Although family conflict at baseline predicted externalizing/internalizing behavior at follow-up, we found no evidence that family conflict and socioeconomic status affected brain structure or that family conflict had a moderating effect on psychopathology and brain outcomes conditioned on socioeconomic status.
Conclusion: These results are consistent with emerging evidence that family conflict is a risk factor for externalizing/internalizing behavior in youth. These findings warrant further attention, focusing on prevention and intervention efforts and social policy development.
{"title":"Can socioeconomic status moderate the effect of a conflictive family environment on brain structure and externalizing/internalizing behavior in children and adolescents?","authors":"Elizabeth Trejos-Castillo, Ann Mastergeorge, Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Vinicius Oliveira Santana, André Zugman, Célia Maria de Araújo, Pedro Mario Pan, Felipe Picon, Luis Augusto Paim Rohde, Andrea P Jackowski","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4195","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the effects of socioeconomic status as a possible moderator of the effects of family conflict on externalizing/internalizing behavior and hippocampal and amygdala volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal complete-case analysis of 714 children and adolescents (mean age: 11.2 years; 46.2% female) was conducted using data from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Psychiatric Disorders in Childhood. At baseline, parents/guardians completed the Family Environment Scale and a socioeconomic status scale. Three years after baseline assessment, the same participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, and the Child Behavior Checklist was administered. Automated segmentation of the amygdala and hippocampus was performed in FreeSurfer 5.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although family conflict at baseline predicted externalizing/internalizing behavior at follow-up, we found no evidence that family conflict and socioeconomic status affected brain structure or that family conflict had a moderating effect on psychopathology and brain outcomes conditioned on socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results are consistent with emerging evidence that family conflict is a risk factor for externalizing/internalizing behavior in youth. These findings warrant further attention, focusing on prevention and intervention efforts and social policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20254195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815386/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144094570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-17DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3611
Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo da Mata, Ari Alex Ramos, Laiss Bertola, Thais Suarez, Cleusa Pinheiro Ferri, Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior
Objective: Given the increasing number of people with dementia in Brazil, health and social systems must urgently plan strategies to meet the needs of this population and their families. Therefore, research on dementia costs is essential. This study estimated direct and indirect dementia-related costs in Brazil.
Methods: We used a cost-of-illness methodology to estimate dementia-related costs, in addition to household interview data from the National Report on Dementia in Brazil (ReNaDe) and public national databases to collect data on health service use and costs. Both a social and a health system perspective were used.
Results: The monthly cost of dementia per patient increases with advancing stages of the syndrome: USD 843.04 in the initial stage, USD 1,317.81 in the intermediate stage, and USD 1,576.15 in the advanced stage. Indirect costs represent = 73% of total expenses. The country's total expenses are the highest during the intermediate stage of dementia.
Conclusion: Family caregivers shoulder at least 73% of the health-related costs of dementia in Brazil, highlighting the need for better support strategies for people with dementia and their families.
{"title":"The cost of dementia in Brazil.","authors":"Fabiana Araújo Figueiredo da Mata, Ari Alex Ramos, Laiss Bertola, Thais Suarez, Cleusa Pinheiro Ferri, Haliton Alves de Oliveira Júnior","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3611","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3611","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the increasing number of people with dementia in Brazil, health and social systems must urgently plan strategies to meet the needs of this population and their families. Therefore, research on dementia costs is essential. This study estimated direct and indirect dementia-related costs in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a cost-of-illness methodology to estimate dementia-related costs, in addition to household interview data from the National Report on Dementia in Brazil (ReNaDe) and public national databases to collect data on health service use and costs. Both a social and a health system perspective were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The monthly cost of dementia per patient increases with advancing stages of the syndrome: USD 843.04 in the initial stage, USD 1,317.81 in the intermediate stage, and USD 1,576.15 in the advanced stage. Indirect costs represent = 73% of total expenses. The country's total expenses are the highest during the intermediate stage of dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family caregivers shoulder at least 73% of the health-related costs of dementia in Brazil, highlighting the need for better support strategies for people with dementia and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681328/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142648416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-19DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3614
Christophe Gauld, Pierre Fourneret, Ben Alderson-Day, Emma Palmer-Cooper, Clément Dondé
Objective: Patients at risk of psychosis present a variety of symptoms, and identifying the most discriminative symptoms is essential for efficient detection and treatment.
Methods: This cross-sectional online study analyzed individuals from the general population to better assess their risk of symptoms classified as clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. The 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire was applied as a self-report screening tool. Item response theory with a graded response model was used to assess the discrimination and difficulty of the questionnaire's criteria.
Results: The analysis included 936 participants (mean age: 21.5 years; 71.9% women). "Déjà vu" stood out for its high discriminative power, while the "voices or whispers" and "seeing things" items had greater precision than the other CHR-related symptoms. Conversely, the "smell or taste" and "changing faces" items were associated with the most severe cases.
Conclusion: This study identified the most indicative CHR-related symptoms for accurate assessment of psychosis severity, which can be used to guide targeted preventative interventions.
{"title":"Addressing the elephant in the screening room: an item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire for at-risk symptoms of psychosis.","authors":"Christophe Gauld, Pierre Fourneret, Ben Alderson-Day, Emma Palmer-Cooper, Clément Dondé","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3614","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients at risk of psychosis present a variety of symptoms, and identifying the most discriminative symptoms is essential for efficient detection and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional online study analyzed individuals from the general population to better assess their risk of symptoms classified as clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis. The 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire was applied as a self-report screening tool. Item response theory with a graded response model was used to assess the discrimination and difficulty of the questionnaire's criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 936 participants (mean age: 21.5 years; 71.9% women). \"Déjà vu\" stood out for its high discriminative power, while the \"voices or whispers\" and \"seeing things\" items had greater precision than the other CHR-related symptoms. Conversely, the \"smell or taste\" and \"changing faces\" items were associated with the most severe cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the most indicative CHR-related symptoms for accurate assessment of psychosis severity, which can be used to guide targeted preventative interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142000665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-02-27DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3765
Júlia Arendt, Malú Zamariolli, Liriel Almodobar, Lucas Toshio Ito, Rafaella Ormond, Adrielle M Oliveira, Vanessa Ota, Luis Augusto Rohde, Euripedes Constantino Miguel, Pedro Pan, Rodrigo Bressan, Giovanni Salum, Sintia Belangero, Marcos Santoro
Objective: This study's purpose was to characterize copy number variations in a Brazilian cohort regarding frequency and inheritance patterns and to determine the effect of copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders on the risk of developing these disorders.
Methods: A total of 2,250 probands and 3,174 parents (897 trios) from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Mental Conditions (BHRCS) were genotyped, with copy number variations detected using PennCNV software.
Results: In total, 56.03% of the copy number variations were inherited. Among the distinct copy number variations, 96.15% were rare (frequency < 1% in the BHRCS). Duplications in 2q13 and 15q13.3 were less frequent, while those in 2q11.2 and 16p11.2 were more frequent in the BHRCS than in databases such as the Database of Genomic Variants and the Genome Aggregation Database. Of the 40 copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders, 18 were identified in the sample. While duplication in 7q11.2 has been considered protective for schizophrenia, we found that deletion in 7q11.2 was protective for mental health disorders (p = 0.033, OR = 0.103). No significant results were found for the other copy number variations, despite mild effect sizes.
Conclusions: This is one of the largest copy number variation studies to have been conducted in a Brazilian sample, and it will be a valuable resource for future meta-analysis, advancing our understanding of the genetics of mental health disorders, especially in diverse populations.
{"title":"Copy number variations in the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort for Mental Conditions.","authors":"Júlia Arendt, Malú Zamariolli, Liriel Almodobar, Lucas Toshio Ito, Rafaella Ormond, Adrielle M Oliveira, Vanessa Ota, Luis Augusto Rohde, Euripedes Constantino Miguel, Pedro Pan, Rodrigo Bressan, Giovanni Salum, Sintia Belangero, Marcos Santoro","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3765","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3765","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study's purpose was to characterize copy number variations in a Brazilian cohort regarding frequency and inheritance patterns and to determine the effect of copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders on the risk of developing these disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2,250 probands and 3,174 parents (897 trios) from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort Study for Mental Conditions (BHRCS) were genotyped, with copy number variations detected using PennCNV software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56.03% of the copy number variations were inherited. Among the distinct copy number variations, 96.15% were rare (frequency < 1% in the BHRCS). Duplications in 2q13 and 15q13.3 were less frequent, while those in 2q11.2 and 16p11.2 were more frequent in the BHRCS than in databases such as the Database of Genomic Variants and the Genome Aggregation Database. Of the 40 copy number variations previously associated with mental health disorders, 18 were identified in the sample. While duplication in 7q11.2 has been considered protective for schizophrenia, we found that deletion in 7q11.2 was protective for mental health disorders (p = 0.033, OR = 0.103). No significant results were found for the other copy number variations, despite mild effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is one of the largest copy number variation studies to have been conducted in a Brazilian sample, and it will be a valuable resource for future meta-analysis, advancing our understanding of the genetics of mental health disorders, especially in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815305/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-11DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3847
Tamires Zanão, Roberta A M P F D Mattar, Bianca S Pinto, Janaina Oliveira, Renata R Vaughan, Isabela M Benseñor, Alessandra Goulart, André R Brunoni, Leandro Valiengo
Objective: Post-stroke depression affects approximately 40% of stroke survivors, with cognitive deficits being frequently observed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown promise in improving cognitive performance in stroke patients. We explored the effects of tDCS on cognitive performance in post-stroke depression.
Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis of 48 patients from a double-blinded, shamcontrolled, randomized clinical trial that investigated the effects of tDCS on post-stroke depression. A neuropsychological battery was applied at baseline and endpoint. We assessed three key domains: 1) the Stroop effect, measured with Stroop Test components (the color-naming, word-reading, and word-color interference tasks); 2) processing speed, measured with the Trail Making Test and the Digit Symbol-Coding task; 3) executive function, assessed with the Digit Span test and the Frontal Assessment Battery. Linear mixed regression models were used to evaluate group-wise changes.
Results: We found that executive function worsened slightly in the active tDCS group and improved in the sham group in the adjusted models. Significant interactions were also found for the Frontal Assessment Battery.
Conclusions: We found no consistent evidence that tDCS significantly improved cognitive domains. The bidirectional association with cognition analysis suggests that the effects of tDCS may vary based on depression severity and task complexity.
{"title":"Cognitive changes in post-stroke depression patients undergoing treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): an exploratory, ancillary analysis of a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Tamires Zanão, Roberta A M P F D Mattar, Bianca S Pinto, Janaina Oliveira, Renata R Vaughan, Isabela M Benseñor, Alessandra Goulart, André R Brunoni, Leandro Valiengo","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3847","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3847","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-stroke depression affects approximately 40% of stroke survivors, with cognitive deficits being frequently observed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown promise in improving cognitive performance in stroke patients. We explored the effects of tDCS on cognitive performance in post-stroke depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory analysis of 48 patients from a double-blinded, shamcontrolled, randomized clinical trial that investigated the effects of tDCS on post-stroke depression. A neuropsychological battery was applied at baseline and endpoint. We assessed three key domains: 1) the Stroop effect, measured with Stroop Test components (the color-naming, word-reading, and word-color interference tasks); 2) processing speed, measured with the Trail Making Test and the Digit Symbol-Coding task; 3) executive function, assessed with the Digit Span test and the Frontal Assessment Battery. Linear mixed regression models were used to evaluate group-wise changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that executive function worsened slightly in the active tDCS group and improved in the sham group in the adjusted models. Significant interactions were also found for the Frontal Assessment Battery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no consistent evidence that tDCS significantly improved cognitive domains. The bidirectional association with cognition analysis suggests that the effects of tDCS may vary based on depression severity and task complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12815390/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142966406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-01-04DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3914
Maíra Barroso Léo, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Rosane Harter Griep, Ana Luísa Patrão, Lidyane do Valle Camelo, Maria Carmen Viana, Luana Giatti
Objective: This study investigated the association between childhood family adversity and depression in a cohort of Brazilian adults over three visits.
Methods: A total of 12,636 participants from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), baseline (2008-2010) and followed up in 2012-2014 and 2017-2019, were included. Five types of family dysfunction and the childhood family dysfunction score (0, 1, and = 2 dysfunctions) were used. The Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised was used to assess depression in visits 1 and 2 or 3. Multinomial logistic regression models estimated crude and adjusted OR and 95%CI.
Results: The mean age of the sample was 59.6 (SD, 8.8) years, 7.4% presented depression in one visit, and 2.2% presented it in two or three visits. After adjustment, compared to no family dysfunction, mental disorder (OR = 3.91; 95%%CI 2.94-5.21), substance abuse (OR = 2.14; 95%CI 1.65-2.77), and parental separation/divorce (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.12-2.15) increased the odds of depression in two or three visits. Exposure to = 2 types of family dysfunction increased the odds of depression in one, and two or three visits in a dose-response gradient.
Conclusion: Exposure to childhood family dysfunction contributes to the occurrence and recurrence of depression in adults. Interventions to prevent dysfunctional family environments and their repercussions on children can reduce the burden of depression.
{"title":"Childhood family adversity and recurrent depression in adulthood: the findings of three ELSA-Brasil follow-up visits.","authors":"Maíra Barroso Léo, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Rosane Harter Griep, Ana Luísa Patrão, Lidyane do Valle Camelo, Maria Carmen Viana, Luana Giatti","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3914","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3914","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the association between childhood family adversity and depression in a cohort of Brazilian adults over three visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 12,636 participants from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil), baseline (2008-2010) and followed up in 2012-2014 and 2017-2019, were included. Five types of family dysfunction and the childhood family dysfunction score (0, 1, and = 2 dysfunctions) were used. The Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised was used to assess depression in visits 1 and 2 or 3. Multinomial logistic regression models estimated crude and adjusted OR and 95%CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the sample was 59.6 (SD, 8.8) years, 7.4% presented depression in one visit, and 2.2% presented it in two or three visits. After adjustment, compared to no family dysfunction, mental disorder (OR = 3.91; 95%%CI 2.94-5.21), substance abuse (OR = 2.14; 95%CI 1.65-2.77), and parental separation/divorce (OR = 1.55; 95%CI 1.12-2.15) increased the odds of depression in two or three visits. Exposure to = 2 types of family dysfunction increased the odds of depression in one, and two or three visits in a dose-response gradient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposure to childhood family dysfunction contributes to the occurrence and recurrence of depression in adults. Interventions to prevent dysfunctional family environments and their repercussions on children can reduce the burden of depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812381/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142954114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3882
Vitor A Petrilli-Mazon, Marcos O Carvalho-Alves, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Felipe Corchs, Mariana Curi, Yuan-Pang Wang
Objective: Recent studies have revealed a heterogeneous prevalence and presentation of post-traumatic stress disorder across countries. It is crucial to assess the methodological and item-level measurement factors that contribute to variations in mental disorder rates across cultures. This study aimed to investigate the traumatic experiences of hospital workers by employing item analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.
Methods: Data were collected from 1,000 employees of a large hospital during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and were analyzed according to item response theory analysis regarding item pool discrimination (a) and difficulty (b) parameters.
Results: The Impact of Event Scale-Revised items had good discriminative ability (a) and covered a range of distress severity (b) associated with traumatic experiences. According to our results, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised is a reliable and informative instrument for assessing individuals with moderate to severe trauma-related distress across the spectrum of trauma symptoms. In particular, items 10 ("jumpy or easily startled") and 6 ("I thought about it when I didn't mean to") reflected the post-traumatic stress disorder domains of hyperarousal and intrusion and excelled in discriminating between different levels of post-traumatic distress. Conversely, items related to avoidance and sleep disturbance showed lower discriminative ability.
Conclusions: Item analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised may be used to assess trauma symptoms in the context of a trauma exposure, identifying the most discriminative and informative items for measuring post-traumatic stress disorder in our context. Our findings may help refine the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and facilitate the development of a more effective scale with optimized item parameters.
{"title":"Item-wise validity study of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised: self-reported reactions of hospital personnel exposed to a stressful workplace.","authors":"Vitor A Petrilli-Mazon, Marcos O Carvalho-Alves, Eurípedes Constantino Miguel, Felipe Corchs, Mariana Curi, Yuan-Pang Wang","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3882","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3882","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent studies have revealed a heterogeneous prevalence and presentation of post-traumatic stress disorder across countries. It is crucial to assess the methodological and item-level measurement factors that contribute to variations in mental disorder rates across cultures. This study aimed to investigate the traumatic experiences of hospital workers by employing item analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 1,000 employees of a large hospital during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and were analyzed according to item response theory analysis regarding item pool discrimination (a) and difficulty (b) parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Impact of Event Scale-Revised items had good discriminative ability (a) and covered a range of distress severity (b) associated with traumatic experiences. According to our results, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised is a reliable and informative instrument for assessing individuals with moderate to severe trauma-related distress across the spectrum of trauma symptoms. In particular, items 10 (\"jumpy or easily startled\") and 6 (\"I thought about it when I didn't mean to\") reflected the post-traumatic stress disorder domains of hyperarousal and intrusion and excelled in discriminating between different levels of post-traumatic distress. Conversely, items related to avoidance and sleep disturbance showed lower discriminative ability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Item analysis of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised may be used to assess trauma symptoms in the context of a trauma exposure, identifying the most discriminative and informative items for measuring post-traumatic stress disorder in our context. Our findings may help refine the Impact of Event Scale-Revised and facilitate the development of a more effective scale with optimized item parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243882"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812350/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-09-27DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3802
Jai Ahuja, Sanobar Jaka, Sikandar Saeed, Sasidhar Gunturu
Digital therapeutics have evolved rapidly with technological advances in healthcare. Despite their increasing use, gaps remain in understanding their regulatory frameworks, integration, and efficacy for conditions like substance use disorder, insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. This study evaluates U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved digital therapeutics and explores their potential to revolutionize psychiatric treatments amid ongoing technological and regulatory changes. We conducted a comprehensive review of major databases, focusing on articles published until January 2024 about FDA-approved digital therapeutics. We excluded non-English articles, those lacking empirical data, and those focusing on non-FDA-approved therapeutics. Our analysis covered regulatory compliance, clinical outcomes, and integration with traditional treatments. A review of nine FDA-cleared digital therapeutics revealed benefits, such as improved treatment accessibility and potential reductions in healthcare costs. For example, through Somryst, a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based treatment for insomnia, over 40% of users overcame chronic insomnia, and 60% experienced improvements without adverse effects. However, challenges remain, including low provider adoption, inadequate insurance coverage, and high user dropout rates. While digital therapeutics enhance accessibility, they face regulatory challenges, reimbursement issues, and require robust clinical evidence. Success depends on collaboration among stakeholders to demonstrate value, ensure safety, and integrate them into existing healthcare systems.
随着医疗保健技术的进步,数字疗法也在迅速发展。尽管其使用日益广泛,但在了解其监管框架、整合以及对药物使用障碍、失眠、注意缺陷多动障碍和创伤后应激障碍等疾病的疗效方面仍存在差距。本研究对美国食品药物管理局批准的数字疗法进行了评估,并探讨了这些疗法在当前的技术和监管变革中彻底改变精神疾病治疗的潜力。我们对主要数据库进行了全面审查,重点关注截至 2024 年 1 月发表的有关 FDA 批准的数字疗法的文章。我们排除了非英语文章、缺乏实证数据或关注非 FDA 批准疗法的文章。我们的分析涵盖了监管合规性、临床结果以及与传统疗法的整合。通过对九种获得 FDA 批准的数字疗法的审查,我们发现了它们的优势,如提高了治疗的可及性,并有可能降低医疗成本。例如,Somryst 是一种基于认知行为疗法的失眠治疗方法,结果显示,40% 以上的用户克服了长期失眠,60% 的用户在无不良反应的情况下获得了改善。然而,挑战依然存在,包括提供商采用率低、保险覆盖面不足以及用户退出率高等。虽然数字疗法提高了可及性,但它们也面临着监管挑战、报销问题以及对可靠临床证据的需求。成功与否取决于利益相关者之间的合作,以展示价值、确保安全并将其整合到现有的医疗保健系统中。
{"title":"Download to heal: navigating the pixelated path of digital therapeutics in psychiatric care.","authors":"Jai Ahuja, Sanobar Jaka, Sikandar Saeed, Sasidhar Gunturu","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3802","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital therapeutics have evolved rapidly with technological advances in healthcare. Despite their increasing use, gaps remain in understanding their regulatory frameworks, integration, and efficacy for conditions like substance use disorder, insomnia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. This study evaluates U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved digital therapeutics and explores their potential to revolutionize psychiatric treatments amid ongoing technological and regulatory changes. We conducted a comprehensive review of major databases, focusing on articles published until January 2024 about FDA-approved digital therapeutics. We excluded non-English articles, those lacking empirical data, and those focusing on non-FDA-approved therapeutics. Our analysis covered regulatory compliance, clinical outcomes, and integration with traditional treatments. A review of nine FDA-cleared digital therapeutics revealed benefits, such as improved treatment accessibility and potential reductions in healthcare costs. For example, through Somryst, a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based treatment for insomnia, over 40% of users overcame chronic insomnia, and 60% experienced improvements without adverse effects. However, challenges remain, including low provider adoption, inadequate insurance coverage, and high user dropout rates. While digital therapeutics enhance accessibility, they face regulatory challenges, reimbursement issues, and require robust clinical evidence. Success depends on collaboration among stakeholders to demonstrate value, ensure safety, and integrate them into existing healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12812344/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142352901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-08-18DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3616
Adriana Maldonado-Martinez, Sheila C Caetano, Marcos V Ribeiro, Alexandra Restrepo-Henao, Paola M Okuda, Thiago M Fidalgo, Pamela J Surkan, Luis Manuel Silva, Silvia S Martins
Objective: Internalizing problems disproportionately affect females in adolescence and adulthood, but research at earlier ages is limited due to a focus on disruptive behaviors. Our study addresses this gap by exploring the structure of internalizing problems and gender differences in Brazilian preschoolers.
Methods: We analyzed data from the Child Behavioral Checklist 1.5-5 (CBCL 1.5-5) as administered in the Preschool Mental Health Study (PreK Survey), involving 1,292 children aged 4 to 5 in Embu das Artes, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Confirmatory factor analysis and comparisons of means explored internalizing problems and gender variations.
Results: A two-factor model best fit both internalizing and externalizing problems. A hierarchical model with four factors (emotionally reactive, anxiety/depression, somatic complaints, and withdrawn) best fit internalizing problems, achieving partial invariance between boys and girls. Boys scored higher in the withdrawn syndrome, while girls scored higher in the somatic complaint syndrome.
Conclusions: Preschoolers' internalizing problems warrant attention beyond their link to externalizing problems. While the overall construct is similar in boys and girls, divergent syndrome scores indicate potential distinct risk patterns requiring further exploration.
背景:在全球范围内,内化问题对青春期和成年期女性的影响尤为严重,但由于对破坏性行为的关注,针对早期年龄段的研究十分有限。我们的研究通过探讨巴西学龄前儿童内化问题的结构和性别差异,弥补了这一空白:我们分析了学前心理健康研究中儿童行为检查表 1.5-5 的数据,该研究涉及巴西圣保罗 Embu das Artes 的 1292 名 4-5 岁儿童。确认因素分析和均值比较探讨了内化问题和性别差异:包含四个因子(情绪反应、焦虑/抑郁、躯体不适和退缩)的分层模型最适合内化问题,在男孩和女孩之间实现了部分不变性。男孩在 "退缩综合症 "中得分较高,而女孩在 "躯体抱怨综合症 "中得分较高:结论:学龄前儿童的内化问题除了与外化问题有关外,还值得关注。虽然男孩和女孩的整体结构相似,但不同的综合征得分表明可能存在不同的风险模式,需要进一步探讨。
{"title":"Internalizing problems can differ in boys and girls since early childhood: findings from the Child Behavioral Checklist 1.5-5.","authors":"Adriana Maldonado-Martinez, Sheila C Caetano, Marcos V Ribeiro, Alexandra Restrepo-Henao, Paola M Okuda, Thiago M Fidalgo, Pamela J Surkan, Luis Manuel Silva, Silvia S Martins","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3616","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3616","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Internalizing problems disproportionately affect females in adolescence and adulthood, but research at earlier ages is limited due to a focus on disruptive behaviors. Our study addresses this gap by exploring the structure of internalizing problems and gender differences in Brazilian preschoolers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from the Child Behavioral Checklist 1.5-5 (CBCL 1.5-5) as administered in the Preschool Mental Health Study (PreK Survey), involving 1,292 children aged 4 to 5 in Embu das Artes, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Confirmatory factor analysis and comparisons of means explored internalizing problems and gender variations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-factor model best fit both internalizing and externalizing problems. A hierarchical model with four factors (emotionally reactive, anxiety/depression, somatic complaints, and withdrawn) best fit internalizing problems, achieving partial invariance between boys and girls. Boys scored higher in the withdrawn syndrome, while girls scored higher in the somatic complaint syndrome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preschoolers' internalizing problems warrant attention beyond their link to externalizing problems. While the overall construct is similar in boys and girls, divergent syndrome scores indicate potential distinct risk patterns requiring further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142000667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-16DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3866
Mariana Troesch, Sarah Prates, Stella Sarmento, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Gabriela Léda-Rêgo, Caroline Dallalana, Juliana S Casqueiro, Paula Studart-Bottó, Ângela Miranda-Scippa
Objective: Functionality and quality of life levels were measured in caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder, investigating the associations between them and with clinical and sociodemographic data.
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2020 and 2022 with caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder treated in a university hospital's outpatient clinic. The following instruments were applied: a clinical and sociodemographic questionnaire, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders.
Results: The median World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score was < 20, and the median score on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey domains was > 60. Caregivers with greater functional impairment had lower quality of life. Being younger, being a parent, having non-psychiatric clinical conditions, and having mental disorders were associated with lower quality of life and functionality.
Conclusion: These results indicate less functional impairment and better perceived quality of life than what has been reported in the literature, demonstrating that there is a subgroup of caregivers who perform their role without significant compromise to these health aspects. Exploring other factors associated with functionality and quality of life, such as resilience, psychological support, etc., may allow for more targeted public health interventions, optimizing comprehensive bidirectional care for patients and caregivers.
{"title":"Satisfactory levels of functionality and quality of life in caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder: is this possible?","authors":"Mariana Troesch, Sarah Prates, Stella Sarmento, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Gabriela Léda-Rêgo, Caroline Dallalana, Juliana S Casqueiro, Paula Studart-Bottó, Ângela Miranda-Scippa","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3866","DOIUrl":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Functionality and quality of life levels were measured in caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder, investigating the associations between them and with clinical and sociodemographic data.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between 2020 and 2022 with caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder treated in a university hospital's outpatient clinic. The following instruments were applied: a clinical and sociodemographic questionnaire, the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score was < 20, and the median score on the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey domains was > 60. Caregivers with greater functional impairment had lower quality of life. Being younger, being a parent, having non-psychiatric clinical conditions, and having mental disorders were associated with lower quality of life and functionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results indicate less functional impairment and better perceived quality of life than what has been reported in the literature, demonstrating that there is a subgroup of caregivers who perform their role without significant compromise to these health aspects. Exploring other factors associated with functionality and quality of life, such as resilience, psychological support, etc., may allow for more targeted public health interventions, optimizing comprehensive bidirectional care for patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":" ","pages":"e20243866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12677893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}