Rheumatology and Therapy最新文献

This is a summary of the original article ‘Ten-year safety and clinical benefit from open label etanercept treatment in children and young adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis’. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) usually appears before the age of 16. JIA causes pain, swelling, and stiffness in the joints. People with JIA receive treatment for several years until the disease goes into prolonged remission. Therefore, the long-term safety of these treatments is an important topic. Etanercept is a treatment for JIA, which acts on the body’s immune system to reduce arthritis. This summary of research article describes safety and how well etanercept works in children with JIA taking it for up to 10 years.

Introduction

Adhesive capsulitis, also known as “frozen shoulder,” is a debilitating shoulder condition increasingly linked to fibroadhesive bursitis, particularly after COVID-19 and related vaccinations. There is no definitive gold standard for its treatment, the primary therapeutic objectives of which are the reduction of pain and the restoration of shoulder range of motion. The aim of our study was to analyze treatment outcomes based on quantitative measures of shoulder function and symptom relief.

Method

Conducted between January 2022 and April 2023, the research involved 45 patients initially diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis and associated fibroadhesive bursitis. After excluding nine patients for other concomitant pathologies (five for calcific tendinopathy and four for rotator cuff injury), 36 patients were randomized into two groups: one group was treated with glenohumeral hydrodistension, the other with glenohumeral hydrodistension combined with bursal injection. Assessments were conducted at baseline and then 2, 4, and 6 months after treatment, focusing on changes in pain levels, functional scores, and range of motion in all planes. Each group followed a home-based rehabilitation protocol.

Results

Significant improvements were observed in both treatment groups, with the combined hydrodistension and bursal injection group showing notably superior outcomes. Specifically, the range of motion in flexion improved from an initial median of 80° to 155° in the combined treatment group, compared to an increase from 75.5° to 129° in the group treated with hydrodistension alone. This enhancement was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Regarding pain reduction, the combined treatment group demonstrated a dramatic decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, from a baseline median of 7 to 1 at the 6-month follow-up. In contrast, the hydrodistension-only group showed a reduction from 7 to 3, with these differences also proving statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided hydrodistension of the glenohumeral joint, if combined with bursal injection and specific exercises, effectively reduces pain, decreases disability, and improves range of motion in patients with second-stage adhesive capsulitis. This study highlights the importance of a combined approach in the management of this complex condition, especially after the histological changes that occurred after COVID-19 and related vaccinations.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06062654.

Introduction

Patterns of treatment response can inform clinical decision-making. This study assessed the course and impact of achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) in clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Post hoc analyses evaluated 1120 patients with PsA receiving guselkumab every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W) or placebo from DISCOVER-1 (31% tumor necrosis factor inhibitor-experienced) and DISCOVER-2 (biologic-naïve). Achievement of MCII in clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), patient global assessment (PtGA) of arthritis, PtGA of psoriasis, patient-reported pain, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary score, PtGA Arthritis + Psoriasis, and PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) was compared between the guselkumab and placebo groups using Cox regression. Logistic regression adjusting for baseline factors evaluated associations between early (W4/W8) MCII achievement and stringent response (≥%50/%70 improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria, cDAPSA low disease activity [LDA], PASDAS LDA, and minimal disease activity) at W24/W52 among guselkumab-randomized patients.

Results

Among patients with highly active PsA (baseline cDAPSA = 44.1–45.0, PASDAS = 6.4–6.5), times to MCII were significantly faster for guselkumab vs. placebo (hazard ratios 1.3–2.5; P < 0.05). Across measures, at first timepoint assessed, MCII rates were significantly higher with guselkumab (Q4W/Q8W 28–68%/29–65%) vs. placebo (19–47%; both P < 0.05). Early (W4/W8) MCII with guselkumab associated with higher odds of achieving stringent responses at W24/W52 (odds ratios 1.4–17.2/1.4–5.4).

Conclusions

In a mixed PsA population, significant proportions of patients treated with guselkumab achieved early (W4/W8) MCII across clinical and PRO measures, which associated with a higher likelihood of attaining clinically relevant improvements and low levels of disease activity at W24/W52.

Trial registration

DISCOVER-1 (NCT03162796).

DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285).

Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease requiring long-term treatment. Bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A, has demonstrated tolerability and sustained clinical efficacy for up to 1 year for patients with PsA. Here, we report the longer-‍term safety and efficacy of bimekizumab up to 2 years.

Methods: BE OPTIMAL (biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve) and BE COMPLETE (prior inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]) assessed subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks in patients with PsA. BE OPTIMAL included a reference arm (adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks); patients switched to bimekizumab at week 52 with no washout between treatments. BE OPTIMAL week 52 and BE COMPLETE week 16 completers were eligible for the BE VITAL open-label extension. Efficacy outcomes are reported to week 104/100 (BE OPTIMAL/BE COMPLETE).

Results: A total of 710/852 (83.3%) bDMARD-naïve and 322/400 (80.5%) TNFi-IR patients completed week 104/100. Up to 104 weeks, patients treated with bimekizumab in BE OPTIMAL and BE COMPLETE had treatment-emergent adverse event incidence rates (exposure-adjusted incidence rate/100 patient-years) of 179.9 (95% CI 166.9, 193.7) and 100.3 (89.2, ‍112.4), respectively. The proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes (≥ 50% improvement from baseline in American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria, 100% improvement from baseline in Psorisis Area and Severity Index [PASI], minimal disease activity [MDA]) was sustained in all patients from week 52 to week 104/100.

Conclusions: Bimekizumab was well tolerated for up to 2 years of treatment and no new safety signals were observed. Sustained clinical efficacy was observed up to 2 years in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with active PsA. Patients switching from adalimumab to bimekizumab demonstrated further improvement in skin and nail symptoms, and sustained efficacy in joint symptoms.

Trial registration: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581), BE VITAL (NCT04009499).

Introduction: Clinical remission is the main target in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, several authors found synovitis in patients with RA in clinical remission at ultrasonography (US). Upadacitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that achieved significantly higher remission rates than adalimumab and abatacept in patients with RA. Here we present the 24-week data of the UPAdacitinib Rheumatoid Arthritis REmission UltraSonography (UPARAREMUS) study.

Methods: This is a longitudinal multicenter observational study, enrolling bio-naïve and bio-inadequate responder patients affected by RA. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving both clinical and US remission at week 24. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission with different composite indexes at week 12 and 24 was also evaluated. US of four target joints (wrists and second metacarpophalangeal bilaterally) was performed at baseline and weeks 12/24, and US remission was defined as the absence of power Doppler (PD) signal ≥ 2 in one target joint, or PD ≥ 1 in two target joints.

Results: After 12 weeks and 24 weeks, 40% and 63.6% of patients achieved US plus clinical remission. The following parameters were associated with US plus clinical remission: being bio-naïve and having a shorter disease duration, although at multivariate analysis significant odds ratio (OR) was found only for being bio-naïve.

Conclusions: UPARAREMUS is the first study evaluating the efficacy of upadacitinib in reaching both clinical and US remission in patients with RA. At 24 weeks, 63.6% of patients reached the primary endpoint, the only baseline associated parameter was being bio-naïve.

Introduction: Real-world data on ixekizumab utilization in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are limited. We evaluated ixekizumab treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with axSpA using United States Merative L.P. MarketScan^® Claims Databases.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with axSpA who initiated ixekizumab during the index period (September 2019-December 2021). Index date was the date of the first ixekizumab claim. All patients had continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment during the 12-month pre-index and follow-up periods. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographics (index date); clinical characteristics (pre-index period); treatment patterns (12-month follow-up period); and HCRU (pre-index and 12-month follow-up periods).

Results: The study included 177 patients (mean age 45.8 years; females 54.8%) with axSpA who initiated ixekizumab. Overall, 79.1% of patients reported prior biologic use; of these, 70.7% received tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) and 49% received secukinumab. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 1.1 (1.3) and ~ 27% of patients reported ≥2 comorbidities. The median (inter-quartile range [IQR]) number of ixekizumab prescription refills was 7 (4-11). The mean (SD) Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) for ixekizumab was 0.6 (0.3) and adherence (PDC ≥80%) was 34.5% (N = 61). Overall, 26.6% (N = 47) of patients switched to a non-index medication and 54.2% (N = 96) of patients discontinued ixekizumab. Among the patients who discontinued ixekizumab (N = 96), 19.8% (N = 19) restarted ixekizumab and 49.0% (N = 47) switched to a non-index medication. The median (IQR) ixekizumab persistence was 268 (120-366) days. Mean axSpA-related outpatient, inpatient, and emergency room visits were similar between the pre-index and follow-up periods. Treatment patterns were largely similar between biologic-experienced patients (N = 140; 79.1%) and the overall population.

Conclusions: Despite high comorbidity burden and majority of the patients being biologic-experienced, patients initiating ixekizumab for axSpA showed favorable persistence profiles during the 12-month follow-up period.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related arthritis is recognized as the most prevalent extraintestinal manifestation (EIM) of IBD. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of undiagnosed IBD-related arthritis and to compare two screening questionnaires, DETection of Arthritis in Inflammatory boweL diseases (DETAIL) and IBd Identification of Spondyloarthritis Questionnaire (IBIS-q), for early disease detection.

Methods: Between April and October 2023, both the DETAIL and IBIS-q questionnaires were administered to consecutive IBD outpatients visiting the University Hospital of Udine, Italy. During routine gastroenterology evaluations, patients aged > 18 years with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) were requested to complete both questionnaires. Subsequently, all patients who completed the questionnaires underwent a blinded rheumatological evaluation within 2 weeks. Patients with a previous diagnosis of IBD-related SpA were then excluded.

Results: Overall, 203 patients were enrolled, of whom 26 were excluded because of a prior diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis. Among the remaining 177 patients, 10/177 (5.6%) received a new diagnosis of IBD-related arthritis. The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 4 (IQR 1.8-10.5) months. Imaging-confirmed enthesitis was the predominant pattern in 8 out 10 cases (80%, with 8 out 8 lacking concomitant peripheral arthritis), axial involvement in 1 out 10 cases (10%), and peripheral arthritis in 1 out 10 cases (10%). The DETAIL questionnaire exhibited higher specificity, but lower sensitivity compared to the IBIS-q, with a sensitivity of 40.0% (12.2-73.8) and specificity of 84.4% (78.0-89.6) versus a sensitivity of 70.0% (34.8-93.3) and specificity of 74.3% (66.9-80.7). Both questionnaires performed less effectively than in other studies.

Conclusion: This study highlights a significant proportion of undiagnosed IBD-related arthritis (5.6%). Enthesitis emerged as the predominant pattern of newly diagnosed arthritis in our cohort, likely due to the recent onset of symptoms. Our study underscores the importance of entheseal involvement in early IBD-related arthritis and the importance of incorporating entheseal involvement into screening questionnaires.

Introduction: The therapeutic arsenal for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is gradually being expanded, but the use of these targeted treatments must be optimal. Our objective was to guide the choice of targeted therapy to use as first-line treatment in a patient with PsA in whom methotrexate (MTX) has failed.

Methods: We searched for literature data in PubMed with the appropriate keywords for the six points of our argument: (1) the tolerance of MTX; (2) the efficacy of targeted therapies combined with MTX vs monotherapy; (3) immunogenicity of anti-tumor necrosis alpha (TNFα) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs); (4) immunogenicity of anti-interleukin (IL)-17, anti-IL-12/23, and anti-IL-23 mAbs; (5) the therapeutic maintenance of anti-TNFα mAbs when combined or not with MTX; (6) the therapeutic maintenance of anti-IL-17 vs anti-TNFα mAbs as first-line targeted therapy.

Results: The proposed rational strategy is as follows: in case of initiation of an anti-TNFα agent, maintaining treatment with MTX seems preferable, even in the absence of evidence of the superior efficacy of the combination, to avoid immunization and reduced therapeutic maintenance; in case of initiation of anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 agents, or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, again in the absence of evidence of the superior efficacy of the combination, discontinuing MTX therapy may be possible, at least in two steps, after verifying the efficacy of the targeted therapy initiated on the joints and skin.

Conclusion: We have data from the literature to guide the choice of targeted therapy to use as first-line treatment in a patient with PsA in whom MTX has failed.

Introduction: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess the relative efficacy at 52 weeks (Wk52) of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks (Q12W) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who were biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug naïve (bDMARD naïve) or who had a previous inadequate response or an intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR).

Methods: Relevant trials were systematically identified. Individual patient data from the bimekizumab trials BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; N = 431) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; N = 267) were matched with summary data on patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 1 trial (NCT01009086; 45 mg, N = 205; 90 mg; N = 204) and a subgroup of TNFi-IR patients receiving ustekinumab in the PSUMMIT 2 trial (NCT01077362; 45 mg, N = 60; 90 mg, N = 58), respectively. Patients from the bimekizumab trials were re-weighted using propensity scores to match the baseline characteristics of the ustekinumab trial patients. Adjustment variables were selected based on expert consensus (n = 5) and adherence to established MAIC guidelines. Non-placebo-adjusted comparisons of recalculated bimekizumab and ustekinumab outcomes for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria (non-responder imputation) were analyzed.

Results: In patients who were bDMARD naïve, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 45 mg: 2.14 [1.35, 3.40]; 90 mg: 1.98 [1.24, 3.16]), ACR50 (45 mg: 2.74 [1.75, 4.29]; 90 mg: 2.29 [1.48, 3.55]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 3.33 [2.04, 5.46]; 90 mg: 3.05 [1.89, 4.91]). In patients who were TNFi-IR, bimekizumab had a greater likelihood of response than ustekinumab at Wk52 for ACR20 (45 mg: 4.17 [2.13, 8.16]; 90 mg: 4.19 [2.07, 8.49]), ACR50 (45 mg: 5.00 [2.26, 11.05]; 90 mg: 3.86 [1.70, 8.79]), and ACR70 (45 mg: 9.85 [2.79, 34.79]; 90 mg: 6.29 [1.98, 20.04]).

Conclusions: Using MAIC, bimekizumab showed greater efficacy than ustekinumab in achieving all ACR responses in patients with PsA who were bDMARD naïve and TNFi-IR at Wk52.

Trial registration: NCT03895203, NCT03896581, NCT01009086, NCT01077362.

Introduction: The study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) complicated by rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: Patients with PMR which could be classified as RA and who were treated with bDMARDs were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the clinical Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score (Clin-PMR-AS) after 26 weeks of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was adverse events during the observation period.

Results: A total of 203 patients with PMR which was resistant or intolerant to glucocorticoids and could be classified as RA were receiving bDMARDs and were enrolled in the study. There were 83, 82, and 38 patients in the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4-immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) groups, respectively. Twenty-six weeks after bDMARD initiation, Clin-PMR-AS levels were significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group as compared to other groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed with Clin-PMR-AS as the objective variable. Body mass index (BMI), history of bDMARDs, and IL-6Ri use were identified as factors involved in Clin-PMR-AS. After adjustment for group characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores, the Clin-PMR-AS score at 26 weeks was significantly lower in the IL-6Ri group (9.0) than in both the TNFi (12.4, p = 0.004) and CTLA4-Ig (15.9, p = 0.003) group.

Conclusion: IL-6Ri may potentially improve the disease activity of PMR compared to other bDMARDs.