Rheumatology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction

The global coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created many challenges in healthcare provision. This study aimed to evaluate the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

The RA Narrative COVID-19 survey was conducted online among people with RA who resided in Brazil, Canada, France, Japan, and the US from August to September 2021. The survey examined disease management, healthcare access and experiences, and participant preferences for interactions with their doctor.

Results

Overall, 500 participants completed the survey: 100 each resided in Brazil, Canada, France, Japan, and the US. Emotional well-being was the aspect of disease management most reported to be negatively impacted by the pandemic (55% of participants); ‘having more anxiety and/or stress’ during the pandemic was the top factor that made controlling RA symptoms more difficult (49% of participants). In comparison, the top factor that made controlling RA symptoms easier was ‘having a less busy schedule’ (35% of participants). More participants had virtual appointments during versus pre-pandemic (53% vs. 13%, respectively) and participants were equally satisfied with the overall quality of care received via virtual and in-person appointments (76% of participants were ‘satisfied’ or ‘very satisfied’ with both). However, participants generally preferred in-person over virtual appointments, except for prescription refills, for which preferences were similar (39% vs. 36%, respectively).

Conclusions

This survey suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did negatively impact some aspects of disease management for people living with RA but had positive impacts on the utilization of virtual care. Although participants generally preferred in-person appointments, these results position virtual care as an appropriate means for routine follow-ups.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, inflammatory rheumatic disease that primarily affects the axial skeleton, often inflicting severe pain, diminished mobility, and a compromised quality of life. The advent of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria for spondyloarthritis (SpA) have enabled the classification of patients with axSpA in the non-radiographic stage but poorly perform if mistakenly used for diagnostic purposes. Despite notable progress in early diagnosis facilitated by referral strategies and extensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization, diagnostic delays persist as a concerning issue. This underscores the urgency to narrow the diagnostic gap and highlights the critical role of early diagnosis in mitigating the long-term structural damage associated with this condition. Research into the impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on inflammatory symptoms and radiographic progression has been extensive. A compelling body of evidence suggests that early intervention leads to superior disease outcomes. However, most of these studies have centered on patients with established diseases rather than those in the early stages. Consequently, findings from studies on early pharmacological intervention remain inconclusive, and the potential for modifying the disease trajectory is still debatable. Without precise data from clinical trials, insights from basic science regarding the pathogenic mechanisms might point toward potential targets that warrant early intervention in the disease process. This review underscores the urgency of early diagnosis and intervention in axSpA, highlighting ongoing research gaps and the need for further exploration to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) play a critical role in inflammation that contributes to disease progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), FLS express tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). TNFα signaling has been shown to be upstream of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling. Overexpression of TNFα and TGFβ, as well as related proteins, can cause increased inflammation in RA. In this study, we examine the effects of inhibiting TNFα signaling with adalimumab on FLS isolated from synovial fluid of patients with JIA.

Methods

Synovial fluid samples were selected from 41 patients in our repository. Of these samples, 23 were diagnosed with persistent oligoarticular JIA and 18 were diagnosed with extended oligoarticular JIA. All samples were taken prior to patients extending to a polyarticular course, or what we termed extended-to-be (ETB), and were on no medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only at the time of arthrocentesis. For cell studies, FLS were isolated from synovial fluid and treated with adalimumab for 24 h. Protein antibody arrays were performed by RayBiotech, Inc. according to their protocols.

Results

In persistent FLS, TNFα (fold change [FC] = 1.2 p = 0.001), TGFβ (FC = 1.5 p = 0.001), lymphotoxin alpha (LTα) (FC = 4.3 p = 0.015), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFRI) (FC = 5.1 p = 0.008), and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFRII) (FC = 3.8 p = 0.025) were significantly elevated in adalimumab treated cells compared to untreated cells. In ETB FLS, TNFα was significantly elevated (FC = 1.04 p = 0.023) while TGFβ (FC = 1.03 p = 0.037) was significantly decreased in adalimumab-treated cells compared to untreated cells.

Conclusions

This data suggests that, after only 24 h, adalimumab is effective at decreasing inflammation that occurs downstream of initial TNFα signaling in extended-to-be fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Introduction: Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib (UPA) in patients with either oligo- or polyarticular active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) using routine clinical practice data from an observational, prospective, multicentre study.

Methods: This interim analysis contains upadacitinib efficacy and safety data from the UPJOINT study, collected from baseline to the week 24 visit with a focus on composite measures, clinical assessments and patient-reported outcomes, amongst others, including minimal disease activity (MDA), very low disease activity (VLDA), Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), resolution of dactylitis and nail psoriasis and body surface area affected by skin psoriasis (BSA).

Results: A total of 296 patients with baseline data and 192 with completed week 24 visits were included in the analysis. The proportion of patients achieving MDA increased from 2.7% at baseline to 39.1% at week 24 (95% CI 32.1, 46.3). Similarly, the number of patients in DAPSA remission (DAPSA ≤ 4) increased from 0 at baseline to 32 (16.7%) by week 24. At that time, 59.4% of the patients were either in DAPSA remission or had low disease activity (DAPSA ≤ 14). During the 24 weeks time frame, the proportion of patients with BSA ≤ 3 increased from 80.7% to 91.1%. Furthermore, at weeks 12 and 24, 45.14% and 47.19% of affected patients showed a resolution of enthesitis. Active dactylitis and nail psoriasis at baseline were reported to affect 10.5% and 22.0%, decreasing to 2.6% and 5.7% at week 24, respectively. The safety findings are consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis and PsA; no new safety risks were identified.

Conclusion: The data from this study confirm the findings of previous randomized controlled trials suggesting UPA is an effective treatment for active PsA without any new safety signals in patients from daily clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04758117.

Introduction: Patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) are at risk of developing macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a life-threatening condition. Some cases of MAS have been reported following the use of biological agents, highlighting the need to identify contributing factors. This study aims to examine the characteristics of MAS in patients with AOSD treated with anakinra (ANA) or tocilizumab (TCZ).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across four online databases to identify studies reporting the incidence rates of MAS in patients with AOSD treated with ANA or TCZ. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and the generic inverse variance method to estimate the pooled incidence rates. The difference in incidence rates of MAS between TCZ and ANA was assessed. Additionally, we analyzed laboratory data and clinical features of AOSD cases at our institution, stratifying them into two groups: those who developed MAS after TCZ administration and those who did not.

Results: Of the 455 screened articles, we included five ANA and six TCZ studies. The pooled incidence rates of MAS were 1.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-3.36) for ANA (345 patients) and 14.01% (95% CI 4.51-23.51) for TCZ (94 patients). MAS incidence was significantly higher in the TCZ group (P = 0.01). Among the 17 patients from our institution, the six patients who developed MAS had significantly higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts, as well as elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and ferritin before TCZ induction (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In patients with AOSD, the manifestation of MAS is influenced by multiple causative factors. Consequently, the administration of TCZ should be approached with caution, particularly in patients exhibiting elevated inflammatory markers.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (Japan) as UMIN000049243.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with the concentrations of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and its major metabolite, desethylhydroxychloroquine (DHCQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: Patients with SLE taking oral HCQ for at least 3 months were recruited from the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. Clinical characteristics and laboratory values were examined. The concentrations of HCQ and DHCQ were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and the effects of various factors on the concentrations were investigated.

Results: A total of 272 patients were included in this study. The average concentration of HCQ was 690.90 ng/ml and the average concentration of DHCQ was 431.84 ng/ml. Multivariate analysis indicated that gender (P = 0.015), age (year) (P < 0.001), weight (kg) (P = 0.013), duration of HCQ use (month) (P < 0.001), systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) (P < 0.001), platelet count (× 10⁹/l) (P < 0.001), immunoglobulin G levels (g/l) (P = 0.014) were associated with low HCQ concentrations. Gender (P = 0.006), duration of HCQ use (month) (P < 0.001), SLEDAI (P = 0.007), and platelet count (× 10⁹/l) (P < 0.001) were associated with low DHCQ concentrations.

Conclusions: Patients with SLE require long-term administration of HCQ, but blood levels vary widely between individuals. Studying the factors influencing the blood HCQ and DHCQ concentrations and optimizing the dose according to individual characteristics might help to improve the efficacy of HCQ.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2300070628.

Introduction: Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a debilitating multiorgan disease characterized by recurring flares leading to organ dysfunction, decreased quality of life, and mortality. Glucocorticoids, the standard of care for IgG4-RD, are associated with substantial treatment-related toxicity. Inebilizumab, an antibody directed against CD19, mediates the rapid and durable depletion of CD19⁺ B cells thought to be involved in IgG4-RD pathogenesis. We describe the first international, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of B-cell depletion for flare prevention in IgG4-RD (MITIGATE).

Methods: The study was designed by an international panel of physicians with expertise in IgG4-RD. Critical trial design decisions included the selection of participants, definition of clinically meaningful primary and secondary endpoints, accommodation of standard of care, and development of flare diagnostic criteria. The study is approved for conduct in 22 countries.

Planned outcomes: The primary efficacy endpoint is time from randomization to the occurrence of the first centrally adjudicated and investigator-treated disease flare during the 1-year randomized controlled period. A set of novel, organ-specific flare diagnostic criteria were developed specifically for this trial, incorporating symptoms and signs, laboratory findings, imaging study results, and pathology data. MITIGATE aims to accrue 39 flares for the primary endpoint, which provides sufficient power to detect a relative risk reduction of 65% in the inebilizumab group. It is anticipated that enrollment of 160 participants will achieve this goal. Additional endpoints include safety, annualized flare rate, flare-free complete remission, quality-of-life measures, and cumulative glucocorticoid use. MITIGATE represents the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of any treatment strategy conducted in IgG4-RD. Data from this study will provide insights into the natural history and pathophysiology of IgG4-RD and the efficacy and safety of B-cell depletion as a therapeutic avenue.

Trial registration: NCT04540497.

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common painful disorder. Intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections are frequently prescribed to treat knee pain. Lorecivivint (LOR), a novel IA cdc2-Like Kinase (CLK)/Dual-Specificity Tyrosine Phosphorylation-Regulated Kinase (DYRK) inhibitor thought to modulate Wnt and inflammatory pathways, has appeared safe and demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo. While LOR is proposed for stand-alone use, in clinical practice, providers might administer LOR in close time proximity to IA corticosteroid. This open-label, parallel-arm, healthy volunteer study assessed potential short-term safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between IA LOR and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA) administered 7 days apart.

Methods: Healthy volunteers were randomized to Treatment Sequence 1 (IA 40 mg TCA followed by IA 0.07 mg LOR) or Treatment Sequence 2 (IA 0.07 mg LOR followed by IA 40 mg TCA). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were categorized by "epoch", with epoch 1 spanning from first until second injection, and epoch 2 spanning from second injection until end of study. Plasma PK was assessed pre injection and out to 22 days after to assess PK treatment interaction.

Results: A total of 18 TEAEs were reported by 11 (27.5%) of 40 enrolled participants, and there were no serious adverse events. Thirteen TEAEs were reported in Treatment Sequence 1 and five in Treatment Sequence 2, similarly distributed between epochs 1 and 2. In all participants and at all time points, plasma LOR concentrations were below the limit of quantification (0.100 ng/mL). Geometric mean concentrations and PK parameters for TCA were similar between treatment sequences.

Conclusion: No safety signals were observed. There were no quantifiable plasma concentrations of LOR in either Treatment Sequence. The PK of TCA was unaffected by previous LOR injection. These results suggest that IA administration of LOR and TCA in close time proximity is unlikely to pose a safety concern.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04598542.

Introduction: RA-BE-REAL is a 3-year, multinational, prospective, observational study of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) evaluating time to discontinuation of initial RA treatment along with patient baseline characteristics. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population.

Methods: Patients initiated treatment with baricitinib (cohort A) or any bDMARD or tsDMARD (cohort B) for the first time. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population. Comparative effectiveness analyses, over 24 months, included time to treatment discontinuation for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response), percentage of patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission or low disease activity (LDA), as well as mean changes from baseline for CDAI, pain visual analogue scale, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For this European subpopulation, comparative analyses were performed using a frequentist model averaging (FMA) framework based on a data-driven machine learning causal inference approach to compare time to discontinuation, effectiveness, rates of remission or LDA, and patient-reported outcomes over 24 months comparing baricitinib with TNFi, as well as non-TNFi and tsDMARD grouped as other mechanism of action (OMA) drugs.

Results: In the European sample of RA-BE-REAL, patients with RA treated with baricitinib experienced fewer discontinuations in comparison to those treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors or OMA. Overall, patients naïve to b/tsDMARDs achieved a higher rate of LDA and remission compared with experienced patients. A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with baricitinib achieved LDA compared with b/tsDMARDs.

Conclusion: This real-world data can better inform clinicians about baricitinib effectiveness and drug survival when prescribing treatment for patients with RA across different subpopulations.

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, an anti-interleukin-17A antibody, in patients with severe symptoms of psoriatic arthritis are largely unexplored. We report the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in a post hoc analysis of the SPIRIT-P1 trial.

Methods: Patients were treated with placebo, ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 4 weeks (Q4W), or adalimumab 40 mg Q2W for 24 weeks. In this subgroup analysis of SPIRIT-P1, the population with severe psoriatic arthritis was defined using the modified composite psoriatic activity index total score > 7 and peripheral arthritis score = 3 (> 4 tender or swollen joint count and ≥ 0.5 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index). Efficacy was measured by joint and skin endpoints including disease progression.

Results: In the severe population, significantly more patients (p ≤ 0.001) treated with ixekizumab than placebo achieved 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 20): 63.3% for ixekizumab Q4W, 60.4% for ixekizumab Q2W, and 24.5% for placebo. Statistically greater responses compared with placebo were observed in the severe population for ACR 50, ACR 70, ACR core set, disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) low disease activity and DAPSA remission, and 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein, as well as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 (p ≤ 0.001). Efficacy findings and the safety profile of ixekizumab in the severe population were consistent with those of the overall population, with no new safety concerns identified.

Conclusions: In patients with severe psoriatic arthritis, 24 weeks of treatment with ixekizumab resulted in improvements in both joint and skin symptoms. The safety profile in the severe population was consistent with the established safety profile of ixekizumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01695239.