RMD Open最新文献

Objective: Treatment strategies of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vary within and between countries. While most patients in Germany are treated on an outpatient basis, some are hospitalised (inpatients). In the recently published randomised CORRA (CORRA, CORticoid bridging in Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial, we studied two 12 week glucocorticoid (GC) bridging strategies in patients with early RA comparing high or low GC doses with placebo, followed by an extension phase of 9 months. Here, in this posthoc analysis, we compared 12 week outcomes of patients according to their initial treatment as inpatients or outpatients.

Methods: Inpatients initially spent 2-5 days (short-term) or 14 days (long-term) in one tertiary rheumatology hospital. Outpatients were mostly treated in rheumatology practices. There was no randomisation regarding the initial treatment strategy. The main endpoint of this posthoc analysis was Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission at weeks 4, 8 and 12.

Results: Data of 280 outpatients and 95 inpatients could be analysed. Inpatients were more often male, had less cardiovascular comorbidity, but higher baseline CDAI scores and more symptoms of depression compared with outpatients. At weeks 8 and 12, CDAI remission was more frequently observed in inpatients (week 8: 24.7 vs 14.9%; week 12: 30.5 vs 17.3%). These results were confirmed in a multivariable model: OR=2.43 (1.06; 5.55); p=0.035, and OR=2.91 (1.37; 6.14); p=0.005, respectively.

Conclusion: In early active RA, initial inpatient treatment was associated with higher CDAI remission rates at weeks 8 and 12. This may be due to the initially more intense hospital care.

Objectives: To demonstrate efficacy equivalence of CT-P47 and EU-approved reference tocilizumab (r-TCZ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: This double-blind, phase III study randomised (1:1) patients to receive CT-P47 or r-TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks until week 20 during treatment period (TP) 1. Prior to week 24 dosing, patients receiving r-TCZ were randomised (1:1) to continue r-TCZ or switch to CT-P47; patients receiving CT-P47 continued CT-P47 (TP2, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks until week 48). The dual primary endpoints (for different regulatory requirements) were mean changes from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) at week 12 and week 24. Efficacy equivalence was determined if CIs for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: (95% CI -0.6, 0.6 (analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)) at week 12 or 90% CI -0.6, 0.5 (ANCOVA with multiple imputation) at week 24). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety endpoints, including immunogenicity, were investigated. Findings up to week 32 are presented.

Results: In TP1, 471 patients were randomised (234 CT-P47; 237 r-TCZ). The 95% and 90% CIs for the estimated treatment differences were contained within the predefined equivalence margins; the estimated difference in DAS28-ESR at week 12 was -0.01 (95% CI -0.26, 0.24) and at week 24 was -0.10 (90% CI -0.30, 0.10). Secondary efficacy endpoints, PKs and overall safety were comparable between groups up to week 32.

Conclusions: Efficacy equivalence, alongside comparable PK, safety and immunogenicity profiles, was determined between CT-P47 and r-TCZ in adults with RA, including after switching from r-TCZ to CT-P47.

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a serious life-threatening tissue disease. A significant aspect of its mortality arises from comorbid conditions. Our study aimed at mapping out the prevalence of these comorbidities and their relation to mortality, thus creating a 'comorbidome'.

Methods: In our retrospective, single-centre observational study, we recorded each patient's data, including demographic informations, vital stats and SSc-related organ involvement, along with the presence or absence of 14 predefined comorbidities. We also documented the dates of their initial and most recent visits. To construct survival curves, we used the Kaplan-Meier method, followed by a Cox regression model for multivariate analysis.

Results: Our study involved 400 participants, 74 of whom unfortunately passed away. It is important to note that three specific comorbidities showed significant correlation to mortality: neoplasia, cardiovascular diseases and polypharmacy, as well as two SSc-specific organ involvements (lung and cardiac).

Conclusion: Our research led to the successful creation of the SSc comorbidome. Comorbidities are a major concern for patients suffering from SSc, particularly cardiovascular diseases and neoplasms. Our study highlights the effects of polypharmacy. The resultant comorbidome offers a comprehensive and analytical perspective on this complex issue and underscores the inter-relatedness of the data. Our study, however, was limited by a small sample size. Therefore, to confirm our findings, validation on a larger scale is necessary. This could potentially contribute to the creation of a future mortality scoring tool.

Objectives: To investigate whether a combination of general health (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), pain (VAS/Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), quality of life (EQ-5D), fatigue (VAS/NRS) and presenteeism (0%-100% productivity loss) could aid as a screening tool to detect active disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: RA patients from the tREACH trial and TARA trial (n=683) and PsA patients from the DEPAR cohort (n=525) were included. The association of a deterioration in the aforementioned patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores between two consecutive visits and having active disease was assessed. Active disease was defined as a change from disease activity score (DAS) ≤2.4 to DAS >2.4 in RA or Disease Activity Index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤14 to DAPSA >14 in PsA. The area under the curve (AUC) of the sum score of deteriorated PROMs was evaluated.

Results: 4594 RA and 1154 PsA visits were evaluated and active disease occurred in 358 (8%) RA and 177 (15%) PsA visits. In both RA and PsA, a deterioration in general health (VAS), HAQ-DI, EQ-5D and pain (VAS/NRS) was significantly associated with active disease. The combination of these PROMs showed acceptable to excellent discriminative ability (RA AUC=0.76, PsA AUC=0.85). If a cut-point of ≥1 deteriorated PROMs is used, 40% of the visits in which RA patients have remission or low disease activity are correctly specified (specificity of 40%), while 10% of visits with active disease are overlooked (sensitivity of 90%). In PsA, these percentages are 41% and 4%, respectively.

Conclusion: A combination of general health, HAQ-DI, EQ-5D and pain could aid as a screening tool for active disease in patients with RA and PsA. These data could help facilitate remote monitoring of RA and PsA patients in the future.

Trial registration numbers: ISRCTN26791028, NTR2754.

Objectives: Early treatment of individuals at risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA-risk) in the preclinical phase has the potential to positively impact both patients and society by preventing disease onset and improving patients' quality of life. The PRAIRI study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with the B-cell depleting agent rituximab (RTX), which resulted in a significant delay of arthritis development of up to 12 months in seropositive RA-risk individuals. Here, we report our findings on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in this study population.

Methods: Seventy-eight RA-risk individuals were treated with one single dose of either placebo (PBO) or 1000 mg RTX plus 100 mg methylprednisolone (MP) and anti-histamines, regardless of treatment allocation, as co-medication. Data on quality of life were collected at baseline and 1, 4, 6, 12 and 24 months using established PRO questionnaires (visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) score, EuroQol five dimension (EQ-5D) and both physical and mental component score of the 36-item short-form heath survey (SF-36)).

Results: No significant changes in quality of life over a 2 year follow-up were observed in at-risk individuals treated with RTX compared to PBO given the PRO scores at 24 months (mean difference±SEM: HAQ score=0.07±0.16; EQ-5D=-0.02±0.05; VAS pain=11.11±7.40). Furthermore, no significant effect of treatment on perceived arthritis severity at the time of clinically manifest disease (arthritis) was found.

Conclusion: One single dose of RTX plus MP administered to RA-risk individuals does not have a meaningful and measurable positive effect on PROs after 2 years of follow-up and/or perceived disease severity at the time of arthritis development.

Trial registration number: Trial registered at EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT Number: 2009-010955-29 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=Prevention+of+RA+by+B+cell+directed+therapy).

Objective: Recent studies have reported that gout is associated with a risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. However, the predictive value of genetic predisposition to gout combined with lifestyle habits for CVD risk remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the association between genetic predisposition to gout and lifestyle habits and the risk of developing CVD in two diverse prospective cohorts from different ancestries.

Methods: A total of 224 689 participants of European descent from the UK Biobank and 50 364 participants of East Asian descent from the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study were included. The genetic risk for gout was assessed using a polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from a meta-genome-wide association study (n=444 533). The incident CVD risk was evaluated according to genetic risk, lifestyle and metabolic syndrome (MetS).

Results: Individuals at high genetic risk for gout had a higher risk of incident CVD than those with low genetic risk across ancestry. Notably, a reduction in CVD risk by up to 62% (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.46; p <0.001) was observed in individuals at both low and high genetic risk for gout when they maintained ideal MetS and favourable lifestyle habits.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a higher genetic risk of gout is significantly associated with an increased risk of CVD. Moreover, adherence to a favourable lifestyle can significantly reduce CVD risk, particularly in individuals with high genetic risk. These results underscore the potential of PRS-based risk assessment to improve clinical outcomes through tailored preventative strategies.

Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most commonly used medications to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the effect of MTX treatment on cellular immune responses remains incompletely understood. This raises concerns about the vulnerability of these patients to emerging infections and following vaccination.

Methods: In the current study, we investigated the impact of MTX treatment in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease on B and CD4 T cell SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses. Eighteen patients with RA and two patients with psoriatic arthritis on MTX monotherapy were included, as well as 10 patients with RA without immunosuppressive treatment, and 29 healthy controls. CD4 T and B cell responses were analysed 7 days and 3-6 months after two SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccinations. High-dimensional flow cytometry analysis was used to analyse fresh whole blood, an activation-induced marker assay to measure antigen-specific CD4 T cells, and spike probes to study antigen-specific B cells.

Results: Seven days following two SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, total B and T cell counts were similar between MTX-treated patients and controls. In addition, spike-specific B cell frequencies were unaffected. Remarkably, the frequency of antigen-specific CD4 T cells was reduced in patients using MTX and correlated strongly with anti-RBD IgG antibodies. These results suggest that decreased CD4 T cell activity may result in slower vaccination antibody responses in MTX-treated patients.

Conclusion: Taken together, MTX treatment reduces vaccine-induced CD4 T cell activation, which correlates with lower antibody responses.

Trial registration number: NL8900.

Rational: Studies are needed to determine if multimorbidity screening and management reduce the rate of multimorbidity accumulation in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD).

Objectives: This study evaluates the impact of systematic screening programme on patient care and hospitalisation rates.

Methods: Patients with IRD who participated in the screening programme (exposed patients) were identified within the French national health database and matched with controls. Two sets of analysis were performed: one with multivariate analysis and a second using a propensity score matching to ensure comparability between exposed patients and controls. The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite score assessing the dispensation of multimorbidity-preventing drugs, including vaccines, lipid-lowering agents, antiosteoporotic medications and antiplatelet drugs, during the year following the index date.

Results: The first analysis included 286 exposed patients and 858 controls, demonstrating a higher rate of meeting the PE in exposed patients (adjusted OR=1.6 (1.2-2.2), p<0.01). Propensity score matching resulted in 281 exposed patients and 281 controls. Exposed patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of meeting the PE compared with controls (54.8% vs 44.5%; OR=1.5; p=0.015), with increased utilisation of vaccines, cholesterol-lowering drugs and antiosteoporotic medications. Furthermore, emergency admission and hospitalisations for fracture, cardiovascular events or infection were significantly less frequent in the exposed group (7.1% vs 15.3%; OR=0.42, p<0.01), with a reduction in severe infections (0.7% vs 3.9%; p=0.03).

Conclusion: Systematic multimorbidity screening in patients with IRD boosted preventive medication use and reduced hospital admissions, justifying time and resource allocation for screening.

Objectives: To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD).

Methods: Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0-10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score.

Results: Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between -1.2 and -0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (-1.2 points (IQR: -2.3 to -0.2)) and ESSPRI score (-1.2 points (IQR: -1.7 to -0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between - 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between -2.0 and -1.0 points, and maximum positive error between -0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85-95).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.