Spinal cord最新文献

Study design: Cross-sectional analysis from the Inception Cohort of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Study (SwiSCI).

Objectives: To describe five lifestyle components in newly injured individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI), explore co-occurrence of these components, and identify associated personal and clinical factors.

Settings: Initial rehabilitation stay following traumatic and non-traumatic SCI.

Methods: Lifestyle components including overweight/obesity, low diet score, physical inactivity, smoking, and alcohol consumption were used independently and to calculate a composite lifestyle score. Analyses were conducted using descriptive statistics, co-occurrence analysis, and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: We included 251 individuals, of whom 77.7% were male, 73.7% suffered from traumatic SCI, and 59.8% had paraplegia. The median age was 51 years (IQR 36-64). Approximately twelve weeks after the injury, more than two-thirds of the study population met the criteria for overweight/obesity, and consumed insufficient amounts of fruits and vegetables, and excessive amounts of meat. Alcohol was consumed by 85.3% of individuals, and 26.8% were current smokers. Almost all study participants met the physical activity guidelines (90 min of moderate to strenuous activity physical activity per week). One-quarter of study participants experienced the co-occurrence of overweight/obesity, low diet score and alcohol consumption. Female sex, younger age and higher education were associated with healthier lifestyle components.

Conclusion: Despite methodological limitations, this study underscores the complexities of healthy lifestyle adherence among individuals newly injured with SCI. It highlights the necessity of improving and implementing screening strategies throughout the continuum of SCI care as early as possible following the trauma.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Objectives: This study's goal is to report whether Magnetization Transfer Ratio (MTR) can evaluate the severity of white matter (WM) injury in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

Setting: Laureate Institute of Brain Research, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.

Methods: 27 DCM patients were aged-matched with 20 healthy controls (HC) and categorized into treatment groups based on modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) severity (11 mild and 16 moderate/severe). Regional and tract MTRs were extracted from the two vertebral levels containing maximum compression within magnetization transfer images. MTR differences between groups were assessed using a one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between MTR and mJOA measures was evaluated using Spearman's correlation.

Results: Significant decreases in MTR were found between HC and moderate/severe groups in the overall (p = 0.0065) and ventral (p = 0.0009) WM regions; and ventral corticospinal (p = 0.0101), ventral reticulospinal (p = 0.0084), spinal lemniscus (p = 0.0079), and fasciculus cuneatus (p = 0.0219) tracts. The spinal lemniscus MTR also significantly decreased between HC and mild groups (p = 0.038). Ventral reticulospinal tract MTR correlated with upper (r = 0.439; p = 0.022) and lower (r = 0.386; p = 0.047) limb motor mJOA scores.

Conclusions: Significant tract-based MTR changes and correlations align with known DCM symptoms, are demonstrated to be lost at the regional level, and display the inhomogeneous compressive damage occurring within DCM spinal cords.

Study design: Guided by the 4-step process outlined in the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline, multiple methodologies were used: Delphi, literature reviews, ratings with consensus, think-aloud, and test-retest.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop and test a spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool that meets the needs of community-based SCI organizations in Canada.

Setting: Peer support programs for people with SCI delivered by community-based SCI organizations.

Methods: This research was co-constructed with executives and staff from SCI community-based organizations, people with SCI, researchers, and students. Given the multiple steps of this study, sample size and characteristics varied based on each step. Participants included people with SCI who received peer support (mentees) or provided peer support (mentors/supporters) and staff of community-based organizations.

Results: In step 1, the 20 most important outcomes for SCI peer support were identified. In step 2 and 3, the 97 items were identified to assess the outcomes and by using rating and multiple consensus methodologies 20 items, one to assess each outcome, were selected. In step 4, content and face validity and test-retest reliability were achieved. The resulting SCI Peer Support Evaluation Tool consists of 20 single-item questions to assess 20 outcomes of SCI peer support.

Conclusion: Through a systematic process, the SCI Peer Support Evaluation Tool is now ready to be implemented to assess outcomes of SCI peer support programs delivered by community-based SCI organizations.

Study design

Cross-sectional study.

Objectives

Cognitive screening is underdeveloped in spinal cord injury (SCI). Therefore, the objectives of our study were: (1) to evaluate cognitive functioning of rehabilitation inpatients with recently acquired spinal cord injury (SCI) with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); (2) to analyse associations between patient and lesion characteristics and the MoCA scores and (3) to compare the MoCA with the cognitive domain of the Utrecht scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER).

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation in a specialized rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands.

Methods

MOCA and USER data of inpatients between November 2020 and December 2021 were used. Correlation and regression analysis were used.

Results

Included were 98 adults aged (median) 61.6 years (range 19.5–83.6), 66% male, 26.5% traumatic SCI, 63% persons with paraplegia. MoCA and USER scores were available for 83 and 92 individuals, respectively. In 44.6% of the participants, the MoCA score was below the cut-off. Age (r = 0.31, p = 0.005) and educational level (r = 0.54 P < 0.00) were significantly correlated to the MoCA score. The MoCA and the cognitive domain of the USER were moderately correlated (r = 0.25, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Almost half of the inpatients scored below the cut-off score on the MoCA. Since the MoCA is a validated cognitive screening tool, the moderate correlation of the MoCA and the cognitive domain of the USER suggests that the USER alone is not sufficient in detecting cognitive deficits. We recommend to screen for cognitive deficits in all people with new SCI.

Sponsorship

None.

Study design

Single institution observational study.

Objectives

To investigate the ceiling and floor effects of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), and Brief-BESTest, as well as to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest in patients with acute and subacute incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) classified as AIS D.

Setting

Advanced critical care center of our university hospital.

Methods

Twenty patients with incomplete cervical SCI who could stand without assistance were recruited. The floor and ceiling effects were evaluated by plotting histograms from the distribution of scores on the BBS, Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, and calculating skewness. The Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest were evaluated and videotaped simultaneously, and intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were assessed. The MDC was also calculated.

Results

The skewness of the BBS was −1.57, and the full score was 35%, indicating a ceiling effect. However, no ceiling or floor effect was observed for the Mini-BESTest and the Brief-BESTest. Intraclass correlation coefficients for intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities were 0.98 and 0.97 for the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively. Individual item reliability was moderate or better for the Mini-BESTest and excellent or better for the Brief-BESTest. The MDC of total scores ranged 3.14–3.84 and 2.92–3.60 for the Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest, respectively.

Conclusions

The Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest are reliable assessment tools for patients with acute and subacute incomplete SCI classified as AIS D. Clarified error ranges aid in estimating the treatment effect on balance abilities.