Morpheaform verrucous sarcoidosis is a rare variation of cutaneous sarcoidosis that is characterized by prominent, localized keratotic plaques on the skin. The etiology of this condition is unknown, and the current literature is limited. Sarcoidosis is typically a systemic condition with high incidence in the African-American population, and cutaneous presentation without systemic manifestation is exceedingly rare. This report details the challenging identification of this condition given the patient's history of multiple concurrent autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Only nine cases of morpheaform sarcoidosis have been reported in the literature. This case demonstrates the complexity of diagnosing cutaneous sarcoidosis if the clinical systemic symptoms have not yet fully developed. It is important to take a multi-disciplinary approach with dermatology, rheumatology, and pulmonology to arrive at the correct diagnosis as cutaneous lesions can mimic several different cutaneous dermatoses. Therefore, physicians should consider morpheaform sarcoidosis on the differential in patients who present with indurated and eroded verruciform plaques.
{"title":"A Case of Atypical Presentation of Morpheaform Verrucous Sarcoidosis","authors":"Akash Rau, Evien Albazi, Kurt Ashack","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.2.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.2.12","url":null,"abstract":"Morpheaform verrucous sarcoidosis is a rare variation of cutaneous sarcoidosis that is characterized by prominent, localized keratotic plaques on the skin. The etiology of this condition is unknown, and the current literature is limited. Sarcoidosis is typically a systemic condition with high incidence in the African-American population, and cutaneous presentation without systemic manifestation is exceedingly rare. This report details the challenging identification of this condition given the patient's history of multiple concurrent autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Only nine cases of morpheaform sarcoidosis have been reported in the literature. This case demonstrates the complexity of diagnosing cutaneous sarcoidosis if the clinical systemic symptoms have not yet fully developed. It is important to take a multi-disciplinary approach with dermatology, rheumatology, and pulmonology to arrive at the correct diagnosis as cutaneous lesions can mimic several different cutaneous dermatoses. Therefore, physicians should consider morpheaform sarcoidosis on the differential in patients who present with indurated and eroded verruciform plaques.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.25251/skin.8.supp.389
Z. Draelos, L. Stein Gold, L. Kircik, Emil Tanghetti
Background: Triple-combination therapies for acne including an antibiotic, topical retinoid, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are among the most effective, with meta-analyses demonstrating greater efficacy with triple-combinations than dual-combinations or topical monotherapy. However, this benefit may be offset by reduced adherence to a complicated treatment regimen. Here, the clinical efficacy of fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% (CAB) gel is reviewed, and the ease of CAB application is compared with the layered application of its individual active ingredients. Methods: In a phase 2 (N=741) and two phase 3 (N=183; N=180), double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies, participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to receive once-daily CAB or vehicle; the phase 2 study also included treatment arms containing dyad gels (BPO/adapalene; clindamycin phosphate/BPO; clindamycin phosphate/adapalene). Efficacy endpoints included treatment success (percentage of participants achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and reductions from baseline in inflammatory (IL) and noninflammatory lesions (NIL). In a split-face study of adults with acne-prone skin (N=25), participant-application of CAB (0.3 cc) was compared to sequential, layered application of benzoyl peroxide cream, adapalene gel, and clindamycin gel (0.1 cc each). IDP-126 and clindamycin gels were compounded with pyranine, which fluoresces under blue light; photos were taken under blue light to assess evenness of product application. Results: In all three clinical studies at week 12, half of CAB-treated participants achieved treatment success (range: 49.6%-52.5%), significantly greater than with vehicle (8.1%-24.9%; P<0.01, all) or dyads (phase 2 study only; 27.8%-30.5%; P≤0.001, all). Reductions from baseline in both IL and NIL were also significantly greater for CAB vs vehicle (range, IL: 75.7%-80.1% vs 50.4%-59.6%; NIL: 71.0%-73.3% vs 45.8%-49.0%; P<0.001, all) and dyads (IL: 64.0%-69.2%; NIL: 58.7%-61.1%; P<0.01, all vs IDP-126). In the split-face study, 100% of Investigator and participant assessments of evenness of application favored CAB over the three layered products. In addition, all participants rated CAB as both easier and faster to apply, and most (96%) preferred CAB for use at home. Conclusions: Fixed-dose CAB gel applied more evenly than separate application of its three active ingredients, and demonstrated significantly greater efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne than dyad gels or vehicle. By addressing three of the main acne pathogenic pathways in a single, easy-to-apply formulation, CAB may improve efficacy of and adherence to acne treatment. Funding: Ortho Dermatologics
{"title":"Triple-Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel for Acne: Clinical Efficacy and Application Characteristics","authors":"Z. Draelos, L. Stein Gold, L. Kircik, Emil Tanghetti","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.389","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Triple-combination therapies for acne including an antibiotic, topical retinoid, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) are among the most effective, with meta-analyses demonstrating greater efficacy with triple-combinations than dual-combinations or topical monotherapy. However, this benefit may be offset by reduced adherence to a complicated treatment regimen. Here, the clinical efficacy of fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% (CAB) gel is reviewed, and the ease of CAB application is compared with the layered application of its individual active ingredients. \u0000Methods: In a phase 2 (N=741) and two phase 3 (N=183; N=180), double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies, participants aged ≥9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to receive once-daily CAB or vehicle; the phase 2 study also included treatment arms containing dyad gels (BPO/adapalene; clindamycin phosphate/BPO; clindamycin phosphate/adapalene). Efficacy endpoints included treatment success (percentage of participants achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and reductions from baseline in inflammatory (IL) and noninflammatory lesions (NIL). In a split-face study of adults with acne-prone skin (N=25), participant-application of CAB (0.3 cc) was compared to sequential, layered application of benzoyl peroxide cream, adapalene gel, and clindamycin gel (0.1 cc each). IDP-126 and clindamycin gels were compounded with pyranine, which fluoresces under blue light; photos were taken under blue light to assess evenness of product application. \u0000Results: In all three clinical studies at week 12, half of CAB-treated participants achieved treatment success (range: 49.6%-52.5%), significantly greater than with vehicle (8.1%-24.9%; P<0.01, all) or dyads (phase 2 study only; 27.8%-30.5%; P≤0.001, all). Reductions from baseline in both IL and NIL were also significantly greater for CAB vs vehicle (range, IL: 75.7%-80.1% vs 50.4%-59.6%; NIL: 71.0%-73.3% vs 45.8%-49.0%; P<0.001, all) and dyads (IL: 64.0%-69.2%; NIL: 58.7%-61.1%; P<0.01, all vs IDP-126). In the split-face study, 100% of Investigator and participant assessments of evenness of application favored CAB over the three layered products. In addition, all participants rated CAB as both easier and faster to apply, and most (96%) preferred CAB for use at home. \u0000Conclusions: Fixed-dose CAB gel applied more evenly than separate application of its three active ingredients, and demonstrated significantly greater efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne than dyad gels or vehicle. By addressing three of the main acne pathogenic pathways in a single, easy-to-apply formulation, CAB may improve efficacy of and adherence to acne treatment. \u0000Funding: Ortho Dermatologics","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Leaping over Leprosy","authors":"K. Ahuja, Grace DeSena","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.2.24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.2.24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.25251/skin.8.supp.362
L. Stein Gold, G. Lewitt, Benjamin Lockshin, P. Brown, Katherine Tillman, Nancy Fitzgerald, Brandon Kirsch, A. Tallman, Abel D. Jarell
Introduction: Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®, Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults, with no restrictions on location, extent, or duration of use. In the phase 3 PSOARING trial program, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) was efficacious and well tolerated for treating psoriasis, including the head and neck region. However, efficacy data specific to scalp treatment were not captured.Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tapinarof cream for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including the scalp. Methods: In this phase 4, open-label trial, adults received tapinarof for 12 weeks. Patients had plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck (stable for ≥3 months), and a target lesion Physician Global Assessment (tPGA) score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), or 4 (severe). The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving a tPGA response (tPGA score of clear [0], or almost clear [1] and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 12). Additional endpoints included time to achieve tPGA response; proportion with complete clearance (tPGA score=0); and with ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI; head and neck region). Safety and tolerability evaluations included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) scores. Results: 31 patients with mild to severe plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region received tapinarof. At baseline, 54.8% had a tPGA score of 3 and 58.1% (18/31) had the target lesion on the scalp. At Week 12, 88.5% (n=23/26) achieved a tPGA response and 80.8% (n=21/26) achieved complete clearance (tPGA=0). There was rapid onset of efficacy, with both tPGA response and complete clearance achieved as early as Week 1, the first assessment, in some patients. Median times to tPGA response and complete clearance were ~4 and 8 weeks, respectively. At Week 12, 96.2% (n=25/26) and 84.6% (n=22/26) achieved a ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in PASI (head and neck region), respectively. Most AEs were mild or moderate, consistent with previous trials; the most frequent were contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and headache. Most patients had no irritation of the head and neck region (LTS score=0) at all visits.Conclusions: Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid onset of clinically meaningful efficacy as early as Week 1 in patients with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including for scalp lesions. Tapinarof cream is a cosmetically elegant, well-tolerated, non-steroidal treatment option in adults with mild to severe plaque psoriasis, including in the head and neck region.Funding Support: Dermavant Sciences, Inc.
{"title":"Tapinarof Cream 1% Once Daily is Efficacious in the Treatment of Mild to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Head and Neck Region","authors":"L. Stein Gold, G. Lewitt, Benjamin Lockshin, P. Brown, Katherine Tillman, Nancy Fitzgerald, Brandon Kirsch, A. Tallman, Abel D. Jarell","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.362","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®, Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults, with no restrictions on location, extent, or duration of use. In the phase 3 PSOARING trial program, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) was efficacious and well tolerated for treating psoriasis, including the head and neck region. However, efficacy data specific to scalp treatment were not captured.Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tapinarof cream for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including the scalp. Methods: In this phase 4, open-label trial, adults received tapinarof for 12 weeks. Patients had plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck (stable for ≥3 months), and a target lesion Physician Global Assessment (tPGA) score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), or 4 (severe). The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving a tPGA response (tPGA score of clear [0], or almost clear [1] and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 12). Additional endpoints included time to achieve tPGA response; proportion with complete clearance (tPGA score=0); and with ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI; head and neck region). Safety and tolerability evaluations included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) scores. Results: 31 patients with mild to severe plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region received tapinarof. At baseline, 54.8% had a tPGA score of 3 and 58.1% (18/31) had the target lesion on the scalp. At Week 12, 88.5% (n=23/26) achieved a tPGA response and 80.8% (n=21/26) achieved complete clearance (tPGA=0). There was rapid onset of efficacy, with both tPGA response and complete clearance achieved as early as Week 1, the first assessment, in some patients. Median times to tPGA response and complete clearance were ~4 and 8 weeks, respectively. At Week 12, 96.2% (n=25/26) and 84.6% (n=22/26) achieved a ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in PASI (head and neck region), respectively. Most AEs were mild or moderate, consistent with previous trials; the most frequent were contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and headache. Most patients had no irritation of the head and neck region (LTS score=0) at all visits.Conclusions: Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid onset of clinically meaningful efficacy as early as Week 1 in patients with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including for scalp lesions. Tapinarof cream is a cosmetically elegant, well-tolerated, non-steroidal treatment option in adults with mild to severe plaque psoriasis, including in the head and neck region.Funding Support: Dermavant Sciences, Inc.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140231551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.25251/skin.8.supp.361
Bruce Strober, Arash Mostaghimi, Milan J Anadkat, C. Thoma, Ming Tang, Jason Guercio, M. Lebwohl
Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic inflammatory, and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab is approved to treat GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report on the underlying disease burden of untreated GPP by longitudinally analyzing patients in the placebo group who did not experience a GPP flare. Materials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. Patients were assessed for measures of chronic disease burden through the use of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Total Score, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) at baseline and at 4-week intervals during the trial, and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Results: 16/31 placebo-treated patients experienced a GPP flare over the 48-week observational period of the trial, defined as an increase in GPPPGA score by ≥2 from baseline and the pustular component of GPPPGA ≥2. Of the remaining (“non-flaring”) 15 patients, 40% (6/15) had at least one GPPPGA Total Score value of 2 (skin not clear or almost clear); 4/6 reported such score at ≥4 visits. Pain scores ranged from 0 to 92.47, with 47% (7/15) and 20% (3/15) of patients having at least one “moderate” and “severe” VAS score over 48 weeks, respectively. Most of the 7 patients’ pain scores fluctuated with episodic peaks and valleys. 47% (7/15) and 13% (2/15) of patients had at least one “moderate” and “severe” PSS score, respectively. “Moderate” and “very large” effect on quality of life was reported, at least once, in 67% (10/15) and 40% (6/15) of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Acute flare was reported in more than 50% (16/31) of patients in the placebo group over 48 weeks. Despite not meeting the trial’s definition of GPP flare, most of the 15 “non-flaring” placebo-treated patients showed clear evidence of underlying GPP disease activity – nearly half did not have “clear” or “almost clear” skin and had moderate pain and symptoms; a small subset reported severe pain and symptoms. Majority of patients experienced a moderate to very large impact on quality of life over the 48 weeks. These findings suggest that untreated GPP negatively affects patients even in the absence of acute flare events.
{"title":"Measuring GPPGA, Pain, Symptom, and Quality of Life Index Scores in Untreated Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Results from the Placebo Group of the Effisayil-2 Trial","authors":"Bruce Strober, Arash Mostaghimi, Milan J Anadkat, C. Thoma, Ming Tang, Jason Guercio, M. Lebwohl","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.361","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction & Objectives: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic inflammatory, and potentially life-threatening skin disease, characterized by flares of sterile pustules. Spesolimab is approved to treat GPP flares in adults. Effisayil 2 (NCT04399837) evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous spesolimab in preventing GPP flares. Here, we report on the underlying disease burden of untreated GPP by longitudinally analyzing patients in the placebo group who did not experience a GPP flare. \u0000Materials & Methods: Eligible patients with a history of GPP were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive one of three subcutaneous spesolimab regimens or placebo for 48 weeks. Patients were assessed for measures of chronic disease burden through the use of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Total Score, Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) at baseline and at 4-week intervals during the trial, and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) at baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48. \u0000Results: 16/31 placebo-treated patients experienced a GPP flare over the 48-week observational period of the trial, defined as an increase in GPPPGA score by ≥2 from baseline and the pustular component of GPPPGA ≥2. Of the remaining (“non-flaring”) 15 patients, 40% (6/15) had at least one GPPPGA Total Score value of 2 (skin not clear or almost clear); 4/6 reported such score at ≥4 visits. Pain scores ranged from 0 to 92.47, with 47% (7/15) and 20% (3/15) of patients having at least one “moderate” and “severe” VAS score over 48 weeks, respectively. Most of the 7 patients’ pain scores fluctuated with episodic peaks and valleys. 47% (7/15) and 13% (2/15) of patients had at least one “moderate” and “severe” PSS score, respectively. “Moderate” and “very large” effect on quality of life was reported, at least once, in 67% (10/15) and 40% (6/15) of patients, respectively. \u0000Conclusion: Acute flare was reported in more than 50% (16/31) of patients in the placebo group over 48 weeks. Despite not meeting the trial’s definition of GPP flare, most of the 15 “non-flaring” placebo-treated patients showed clear evidence of underlying GPP disease activity – nearly half did not have “clear” or “almost clear” skin and had moderate pain and symptoms; a small subset reported severe pain and symptoms. Majority of patients experienced a moderate to very large impact on quality of life over the 48 weeks. These findings suggest that untreated GPP negatively affects patients even in the absence of acute flare events.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140232801","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mesa Bouni, Ricardo Guerra, Matthew Viveiros, C. G. Hobayan, David Carr, Kathryn Shahwan
Introduction: Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) are rare cutaneous malignancies often seen in elderly patients with photodamaged skin. Although solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with AFX/PDS appear to have worse outcomes than the general population, the risk of progression from AFX to PDS in this group is not well studied. We present the case of a lung transplant patient with AFX recurring as PDS. Case Presentation: A 68-year-old male lung transplant patient with an extensive history of skin cancer presented with a 9-millimeter erythematous papule on the right vertex scalp. Biopsy revealed AFX, and the tumor cleared with 1 stage of MMS. Seven months later, the patient developed a rapidly growing, hemorrhagic nodule at the site, which was diagnosed as PDS. Despite initial treatment with doxorubicin, pazopanib, and radiation to the lung, liver, and bone lesions, the patient’s disease progressed. The patient was started on pembrolizumab with prednisone to mitigate the risk of organ rejection but succumbed to pneumonia with septic shock and respiratory failure. Discussion: Transplant patients have an increased risk of poor outcomes related to PDS. ICIs may be considered in advanced cases in which other treatment options have been exhausted. In conclusion, SOTRs with AFX/PDS should be aggressively treated and monitored as their risk of unfavorable outcomes appears to be increased.
{"title":"Progression of Atypical Fibroxanthoma to Metastatic Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma in a Lung Transplant Recipient","authors":"Mesa Bouni, Ricardo Guerra, Matthew Viveiros, C. G. Hobayan, David Carr, Kathryn Shahwan","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.2.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.2.13","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) are rare cutaneous malignancies often seen in elderly patients with photodamaged skin. Although solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with AFX/PDS appear to have worse outcomes than the general population, the risk of progression from AFX to PDS in this group is not well studied. We present the case of a lung transplant patient with AFX recurring as PDS.\u0000Case Presentation: A 68-year-old male lung transplant patient with an extensive history of skin cancer presented with a 9-millimeter erythematous papule on the right vertex scalp. Biopsy revealed AFX, and the tumor cleared with 1 stage of MMS. Seven months later, the patient developed a rapidly growing, hemorrhagic nodule at the site, which was diagnosed as PDS. Despite initial treatment with doxorubicin, pazopanib, and radiation to the lung, liver, and bone lesions, the patient’s disease progressed. The patient was started on pembrolizumab with prednisone to mitigate the risk of organ rejection but succumbed to pneumonia with septic shock and respiratory failure.\u0000Discussion: Transplant patients have an increased risk of poor outcomes related to PDS. ICIs may be considered in advanced cases in which other treatment options have been exhausted. In conclusion, SOTRs with AFX/PDS should be aggressively treated and monitored as their risk of unfavorable outcomes appears to be increased. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140232896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.25251/skin.8.supp.373
V. H. Prajapati, Bob Geng, Andrew Blauvelt, L. Eichenfield, Parbeer S. Grewal, L. Kircik, Peter Lio, Charles Lynde, E. Simpson, Haobo Ren, D. Sturm, Grace Wong, Chih-ho Hong
In the TRuE-AD1/2 studies, patients aged ≥12 years with atopic dermatitis (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 2/3; 3%–20% affected body surface area) were randomized (2:2:1) to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for an 8-week, double-blind period followed by a 44-week long-term safety (LTS) period of as-needed ruxolitinib cream. This analysis examines associations between Week 8 responder status to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream with LTS outcomes. At Week 8, 57.0% (244/428) of LTS-evaluable patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream achieved IGA–Treatment Success (IGA-TS; IGA 0/1 with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline); 66.6% (285/428) achieved ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from baseline (EASI-75); 45.8% (196/428) achieved Itch numerical rating scale 0/1 (NRS 0/1). For patients with ≥2 visits (every 4 weeks) during LTS, mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were 83.2% vs 59.7%, 82.2% vs 54.9%, and 77.3% vs 70.1% for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were similar regardless of time to achieve IGA-TS (83.4%/77.4%/81.9% for those achieving at Week 2/4/8), EASI-75 (80.7%/78.8%/81.6%), and Itch NRS 0/1 (75.8%/70.7%/72.8%). During LTS, mean (SD) cumulative treatment-free days due to complete clearance were 149.2 (86.43) vs 104.0 (89.10), 146.4 (88.43) vs 95.9 (83.55), and 142.6 (87.58) vs 124.4 (91.47) for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Percentage of treatment-free days between study visits (between Weeks 8 and 12 vs Weeks 48 and 52) among Week 8 responders and nonresponders increased from 44.1% to 50.2% and from 16.3% to 42.3% for IGA-TS; from 41.2% to 49.9% and from 14.9% to 40.6% for EASI-75; from 39.8% to 49.4% and from 29.9% to 46.0% for itch NRS 0/1. In summary, efficacy responses achieved with 8-week ruxolitinib cream treatment are associated with higher disease control in LTS; however, nonresponders approach similar disease control with continued treatment. As-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy demonstrated substantial long-term disease control regardless of time to first response achievement.
{"title":"Association Between Early Clinical Responses and Long-Term Outcomes With Ruxolitinib Cream Treatment in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis","authors":"V. H. Prajapati, Bob Geng, Andrew Blauvelt, L. Eichenfield, Parbeer S. Grewal, L. Kircik, Peter Lio, Charles Lynde, E. Simpson, Haobo Ren, D. Sturm, Grace Wong, Chih-ho Hong","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.373","url":null,"abstract":"In the TRuE-AD1/2 studies, patients aged ≥12 years with atopic dermatitis (Investigator’s Global Assessment [IGA] 2/3; 3%–20% affected body surface area) were randomized (2:2:1) to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for an 8-week, double-blind period followed by a 44-week long-term safety (LTS) period of as-needed ruxolitinib cream. This analysis examines associations between Week 8 responder status to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream with LTS outcomes. At Week 8, 57.0% (244/428) of LTS-evaluable patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream achieved IGA–Treatment Success (IGA-TS; IGA 0/1 with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline); 66.6% (285/428) achieved ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index from baseline (EASI-75); 45.8% (196/428) achieved Itch numerical rating scale 0/1 (NRS 0/1). For patients with ≥2 visits (every 4 weeks) during LTS, mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were 83.2% vs 59.7%, 82.2% vs 54.9%, and 77.3% vs 70.1% for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Mean percentages of visits with clear/almost clear skin were similar regardless of time to achieve IGA-TS (83.4%/77.4%/81.9% for those achieving at Week 2/4/8), EASI-75 (80.7%/78.8%/81.6%), and Itch NRS 0/1 (75.8%/70.7%/72.8%). During LTS, mean (SD) cumulative treatment-free days due to complete clearance were 149.2 (86.43) vs 104.0 (89.10), 146.4 (88.43) vs 95.9 (83.55), and 142.6 (87.58) vs 124.4 (91.47) for Week 8 IGA-TS, EASI-75, and Itch NRS 0/1 responders vs nonresponders, respectively. Percentage of treatment-free days between study visits (between Weeks 8 and 12 vs Weeks 48 and 52) among Week 8 responders and nonresponders increased from 44.1% to 50.2% and from 16.3% to 42.3% for IGA-TS; from 41.2% to 49.9% and from 14.9% to 40.6% for EASI-75; from 39.8% to 49.4% and from 29.9% to 46.0% for itch NRS 0/1. In summary, efficacy responses achieved with 8-week ruxolitinib cream treatment are associated with higher disease control in LTS; however, nonresponders approach similar disease control with continued treatment. As-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy demonstrated substantial long-term disease control regardless of time to first response achievement.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140232966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-18DOI: 10.25251/skin.8.supp.395
Keith Davis, Andrew Messenger, Sergio Vañó Galván, Helen Tran, L. Napatalung, Kent Hanson, Ernest Law
Background: A range of medications with varying efficacy are used to treat alopecia areata (AA). There remains limited evidence on prevailing treatments, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with AA in routine practice, particularly for those with extensive hair loss. This study sought to address this evidence gap. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study spanning the United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Germany. Adult and adolescent patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss were included. The study index date was defined as date of de novo or progression to ≥50% scalp hair loss and patients were required to have ≥6 months of postindex follow-up (i.e., index date to last clinic visit); index dates ranged 2015-2019. Analyses were descriptive and reported patient demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and Dermatologic Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. The primary clinical endpoint was absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and was assessed longitudinally based on post-index visits in which SALT was recorded. Sustained SALT ≤20 was also assessed via Kaplan-Meier methods to evaluate time to achieving SALT ≤20 without subsequent regression within 6 months to SALT >30. Results: A total of 741 patients were included. Median age at AA diagnosis was 27 years and 52.6% were female. Mean (SD) baseline SALT score at index was 63.5 (15.6), with 80.2% having patchy AA and 19.8% having alopecia totalis or universalis. Among patients with DLQI measured at index, mean (SD) DLQI score was 19.2 (7.2) with 84.5% reporting either a large (DLQI 11-20) or extremely large (DLQI 21-30) impact of AA. Topical corticosteroids were the most common treatment observed post-index, with 55.6% receiving ≥1 course with a median cumulative exposure of 4 months. Intralesional corticosteroids (22.5%), systemic immunosuppressants (22.0%), and oral (17.3%) or topical (19.4%) minoxidil were also common. Among patients with SALT measured at 12 months post-index, there was a mean (SD) absolute SALT reduction of -44.6% (37.3%) from baseline. However, at 12 months post-index, most patients (90.1%) failed to achieve SALT ≤20 that was sustained for ≥6 months. Conclusions: Although patients in this study experienced a substantial absolute SALT score reduction, few patients achieved and subsequentially sustained the more clinically meaningful SALT threshold of ≤20. These findings highlight the potential suboptimal effectiveness of the varied treatments applied in this population.
背景：目前有一系列疗效各异的药物用于治疗斑秃（AA）。目前，有关 AA 患者的常规治疗方法、疾病特征和临床疗效的证据仍然有限，尤其是对大面积脱发患者而言。本研究旨在填补这一证据空白。方法：这是一项横跨英国、法国、西班牙和德国的回顾性病历研究。研究对象包括头皮脱发≥50%的成人和青少年患者。研究指数日期定义为头皮脱发新发或进展至≥50%的日期，患者需在指数后随访≥6个月（即指数日期至最后一次就诊日期）；指数日期从2015年至2019年不等。分析为描述性分析，报告了患者人口统计学特征、基线临床特征和皮肤病生活质量指数（DLQI）得分。主要临床终点是脱发严重程度工具（SALT）的绝对评分，根据记录了SALT的指标后访视进行纵向评估。此外，还通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法对 SALT ≤20 的持续时间进行评估，以确定在 6 个月内达到 SALT ≤20 且不出现 SALT >30 的情况。结果：共纳入 741 名患者。确诊为 AA 时的中位年龄为 27 岁，52.6% 为女性。指数时基线 SALT 评分的平均值（标度）为 63.5（15.6），其中 80.2% 患有斑片状 AA，19.8% 患有全秃或普秃。在指数测得 DLQI 的患者中，DLQI 平均（标度）分为 19.2（7.2）分，84.5% 的患者报告 AA 影响较大（DLQI 11-20）或极大（DLQI 21-30）。外用皮质类固醇激素是指数后观察到的最常见治疗方法，55.6%的患者接受了≥1个疗程的治疗，中位累积接触时间为4个月。皮质类固醇（22.5%）、全身性免疫抑制剂（22.0%）和口服（17.3%）或外用（19.4%）米诺地尔也很常见。在指数发布后 12 个月测量 SALT 的患者中，SALT 绝对值平均（标度）比基线下降了 -44.6% (37.3%)。然而，在指数发布后的 12 个月中，大多数患者（90.1%）未能达到 SALT≤20 且持续时间≥6 个月。结论：虽然本研究中的患者的 SALT 绝对值大幅降低，但只有极少数患者达到并持续保持更有临床意义的 SALT 阈值≤20。这些发现凸显了在该人群中应用的各种治疗方法的潜在次优效果。
{"title":"Real-World Assessment of Disease Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in Alopecia Areata in a Global Noninterventional Observational Cohort (ADAAGIO)","authors":"Keith Davis, Andrew Messenger, Sergio Vañó Galván, Helen Tran, L. Napatalung, Kent Hanson, Ernest Law","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.395","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.395","url":null,"abstract":"Background: A range of medications with varying efficacy are used to treat alopecia areata (AA). There remains limited evidence on prevailing treatments, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with AA in routine practice, particularly for those with extensive hair loss. This study sought to address this evidence gap. \u0000Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study spanning the United Kingdom, France, Spain, and Germany. Adult and adolescent patients with ≥50% scalp hair loss were included. The study index date was defined as date of de novo or progression to ≥50% scalp hair loss and patients were required to have ≥6 months of postindex follow-up (i.e., index date to last clinic visit); index dates ranged 2015-2019. Analyses were descriptive and reported patient demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, and Dermatologic Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. The primary clinical endpoint was absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and was assessed longitudinally based on post-index visits in which SALT was recorded. Sustained SALT ≤20 was also assessed via Kaplan-Meier methods to evaluate time to achieving SALT ≤20 without subsequent regression within 6 months to SALT >30. \u0000Results: A total of 741 patients were included. Median age at AA diagnosis was 27 years and 52.6% were female. Mean (SD) baseline SALT score at index was 63.5 (15.6), with 80.2% having patchy AA and 19.8% having alopecia totalis or universalis. Among patients with DLQI measured at index, mean (SD) DLQI score was 19.2 (7.2) with 84.5% reporting either a large (DLQI 11-20) or extremely large (DLQI 21-30) impact of AA. Topical corticosteroids were the most common treatment observed post-index, with 55.6% receiving ≥1 course with a median cumulative exposure of 4 months. Intralesional corticosteroids (22.5%), systemic immunosuppressants (22.0%), and oral (17.3%) or topical (19.4%) minoxidil were also common. Among patients with SALT measured at 12 months post-index, there was a mean (SD) absolute SALT reduction of -44.6% (37.3%) from baseline. However, at 12 months post-index, most patients (90.1%) failed to achieve SALT ≤20 that was sustained for ≥6 months. \u0000Conclusions: Although patients in this study experienced a substantial absolute SALT score reduction, few patients achieved and subsequentially sustained the more clinically meaningful SALT threshold of ≤20. These findings highlight the potential suboptimal effectiveness of the varied treatments applied in this population.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140231781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Danny Zakria, Lauren Miller, Thomas Chao, Kirk Gautier, Holly Glover, Kristine Kucera, Andrea Nguyen, Leigh Ann Pansch, Rachel Printy, Cynthia Trickett, Joleen Volz, Milaan Shah, Joshua Burshtein
Background: While there are numerous effective therapies for psoriasis, there remains an unmet need as some patients still suffer from inadequate response with available medications. Bimekizumab is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that inhibits both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this study was for a panel of experts in psoriasis management to review the available data on bimekizumab and create consensus statements on its use in clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted for English-language original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses discussing the safety and efficacy of bimekizumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A panel of nine dermatology physician assistants and one dermatology nurse practitioner with significant expertise in the management of psoriasis convened virtually on December 16, 2023, to review the studies and create recommendations for their peers on the use of bimekizumab. A modified Delphi process was implemented to reach a consensus on these statements and the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy was used to assign each one a strength of recommendation. Results: The literature search resulted in 92 articles that met search criteria. After a thorough screening of these studies for relevance to the discussion questions, 20 articles remained and were distributed to each panelist prior to the meeting. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 10 consensus recommendations and assigned all 10 statements a strength of recommendation of “A.” Conclusion: Bimekizumab has a very high efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. It also has a favorable safety profile that is consistent with that of other biologics, except for an increased risk of oral candidiasis.
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab for Plaque Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: An Expert Consensus Panel Report","authors":"Danny Zakria, Lauren Miller, Thomas Chao, Kirk Gautier, Holly Glover, Kristine Kucera, Andrea Nguyen, Leigh Ann Pansch, Rachel Printy, Cynthia Trickett, Joleen Volz, Milaan Shah, Joshua Burshtein","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.2.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.2.1","url":null,"abstract":"Background: While there are numerous effective therapies for psoriasis, there remains an unmet need as some patients still suffer from inadequate response with available medications. Bimekizumab is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that inhibits both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F and was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this study was for a panel of experts in psoriasis management to review the available data on bimekizumab and create consensus statements on its use in clinical practice. \u0000Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted for English-language original research articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses discussing the safety and efficacy of bimekizumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. A panel of nine dermatology physician assistants and one dermatology nurse practitioner with significant expertise in the management of psoriasis convened virtually on December 16, 2023, to review the studies and create recommendations for their peers on the use of bimekizumab. A modified Delphi process was implemented to reach a consensus on these statements and the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy was used to assign each one a strength of recommendation. \u0000Results: The literature search resulted in 92 articles that met search criteria. After a thorough screening of these studies for relevance to the discussion questions, 20 articles remained and were distributed to each panelist prior to the meeting. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 10 consensus recommendations and assigned all 10 statements a strength of recommendation of “A.” \u0000Conclusion: Bimekizumab has a very high efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. It also has a favorable safety profile that is consistent with that of other biologics, except for an increased risk of oral candidiasis.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140232914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Abdelnour, Kurt Ashack, Rosie Balk, Rushan Theunis, Jeff Miller
Background: Physician burnout is a pressing concern with substantial implications for both providers and the healthcare system. Methods: An 8-minute survey was distributed via email to members of the American Academy of Dermatology Association. Results: The survey revealed burnout is widespread among both dermatology residents and fellows. Conclusion: Residents and fellows expressed a desire for systemic changes in their working conditions.
{"title":"Burnout Among Dermatology Residents and Fellows: A Survey Study","authors":"A. Abdelnour, Kurt Ashack, Rosie Balk, Rushan Theunis, Jeff Miller","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.2.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.2.6","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Physician burnout is a pressing concern with substantial implications for both providers and the healthcare system. Methods: An 8-minute survey was distributed via email to members of the American Academy of Dermatology Association. Results: The survey revealed burnout is widespread among both dermatology residents and fellows. Conclusion: Residents and fellows expressed a desire for systemic changes in their working conditions.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140233459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：