首页 > 最新文献

Southern Medical Journal最新文献

英文 中文
A Proportionate Mortality Study of Mississippi's Agricultural Industry, 2017-2021. 2017-2021 年密西西比州农业产业死亡率比例研究》。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001702
Devon Mills, Mary Nelson Robertson, Brian E Mills, David R Buys

Objectives: Individuals employed in the agricultural industry encounter hazards in their work that could lead to injury or illness. Furthermore, the mental stress of being involved in the agricultural industry could lead to negative health-related outcomes for workers. This study evaluates the causes of deaths among employees in Mississippi's agricultural industry from 2017 to 2021.

Methods: Data are provided by the Mississippi Department of Health. Proportionate mortality ratios (PMRs) are calculated to determine if agricultural industry employees show an elevated mortality in comparison to the general population for any cause of death.

Results: Agricultural industry employees show a statistically significant elevated mortality for circulatory disease (PMR 107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 103-110) and coronavirus disease 2019 (PMR 122, 95% CI 111-134). They also show a significant excess mortality for deaths caused by transport accidents (PMR 117, 95% CI 101-136) and exposure to inanimate mechanical forces (PMR 274, 95% CI 183-396).

Conclusions: The causes of death for which agricultural employees show an excess mortality can be explained by the hazards associated with working in the agricultural industry. These findings can be used to create targeted future public health programs for individuals who are employed in agriculture.

目标:受雇于农业行业的个人在工作中会遇到可能导致受伤或生病的危险。此外,从事农业工作所带来的精神压力也可能导致工人出现与健康相关的负面结果。本研究评估了 2017 年至 2021 年密西西比州农业行业雇员的死亡原因:数据由密西西比州卫生部提供。计算比例死亡率(PMRs),以确定与普通人群相比,农业从业人员在任何死因上的死亡率是否升高:结果:农业从业人员在循环系统疾病(PMR 107,95% 置信区间 [CI] 103-110)和 2019 年冠状病毒疾病(PMR 122,95% 置信区间 111-134)方面的死亡率有显著的统计学意义。这些数据还显示,运输事故(PMR 117,95% CI 101-136)和暴露于无生命机械力(PMR 274,95% CI 183-396)导致的死亡率也明显偏高:农业从业人员的超高死亡率可以用与农业工作相关的危害来解释。这些发现可用于今后为农业从业人员制定有针对性的公共卫生计划。
{"title":"A Proportionate Mortality Study of Mississippi's Agricultural Industry, 2017-2021.","authors":"Devon Mills, Mary Nelson Robertson, Brian E Mills, David R Buys","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001702","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individuals employed in the agricultural industry encounter hazards in their work that could lead to injury or illness. Furthermore, the mental stress of being involved in the agricultural industry could lead to negative health-related outcomes for workers. This study evaluates the causes of deaths among employees in Mississippi's agricultural industry from 2017 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are provided by the Mississippi Department of Health. Proportionate mortality ratios (PMRs) are calculated to determine if agricultural industry employees show an elevated mortality in comparison to the general population for any cause of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agricultural industry employees show a statistically significant elevated mortality for circulatory disease (PMR 107, 95% confidence interval [CI] 103-110) and coronavirus disease 2019 (PMR 122, 95% CI 111-134). They also show a significant excess mortality for deaths caused by transport accidents (PMR 117, 95% CI 101-136) and exposure to inanimate mechanical forces (PMR 274, 95% CI 183-396).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The causes of death for which agricultural employees show an excess mortality can be explained by the hazards associated with working in the agricultural industry. These findings can be used to create targeted future public health programs for individuals who are employed in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using a Chat-Based Trivia Activity to Foster Community in Residency. 利用基于聊天的琐事活动来培养驻地社区。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001705
Orhue Odaro, Jonathan Lim

Objectives: For residency programs rotating at multiple sites, building a strong community can be challenging when house staff are geographically separated. Medical educators have had widespread use of technology to create virtual classrooms, discussion boards, and other activities. Less is known, however, about smaller-scale use of technology such as longitudinal use of chat to engage learners. We developed a chat-based trivia activity using social media tools to promote learning, community, and belonging in a large multisite residency program.

Methods: Residents in our large academic program were invited to participate in a question-based activity called Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays (IMTT) via the chat application GroupMe. Three to five questions were asked of all of the participants using a multimedia format. Question content included topics from the residency didactic curriculum and trivia about program leadership. A voluntary, anonymous survey on the effect of the activity on learning and belonging was sent to all of the residents at the end of the academic year.

Results: Of the 224 residents, there were 48 survey respondents (21.4% response rate). When asked about overall satisfaction with the program, 43.8% (21/48) of all of the respondents reported feeling "somewhat satisfied" or "very satisfied." Residents who frequently participated in Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays experienced greater excitement about learning and a greater sense of community compared with those with infrequent to no participation.

Conclusions: Our intervention used a theoretical framework of connectivism to design a virtual learning activity to engage residents, as well as to foster community among residents and between residents and program leadership. We believe this virtual learning experience is low cost and feasible, requiring mostly facilitator time. This study also contributes to the literature by evaluating outcomes related to social belonging and engagement. Future iterations should aim to optimize the methods of delivery by considering user-friendliness and the ability to opt out of the activity.

目标:对于在多个地点轮转的住院医师培训项目来说,如果住院医师的工作地点相距遥远,那么建立一个强大的社区就很有挑战性。医学教育工作者已经广泛使用技术来创建虚拟教室、讨论板和其他活动。然而,人们对技术的小规模使用了解较少,例如纵向使用聊天来吸引学习者。我们利用社交媒体工具开发了一种基于聊天的琐事活动,以促进大型多地点住院医师培训项目中的学习、社区和归属感:方法:我们的大型学术项目邀请住院医师通过聊天应用程序 GroupMe 参加一项名为 "内科琐事星期四"(IMTT)的提问活动。活动采用多媒体形式,向所有参与者提出三到五个问题。问题内容包括住院医生教学课程中的主题和有关项目领导的琐事。学年结束时,向所有住院医师发送了一份关于活动对学习和归属感影响的自愿匿名调查:结果:在 224 名住院医师中,有 48 人回复了调查(回复率为 21.4%)。当被问及对项目的总体满意度时,43.8% 的受访者(21/48)表示 "比较满意 "或 "非常满意"。经常参加 "内科琐事周四 "的住院医师与不经常参加或没有参加的住院医师相比,学习热情更高,社区感更强:我们的干预措施采用了联结主义理论框架,设计了一种虚拟学习活动,以吸引住院医师参与,并促进住院医师之间以及住院医师与项目领导之间的交流。我们认为,这种虚拟学习体验成本低、可行性高,只需要主持人花费很少的时间。本研究还通过评估与社会归属感和参与度相关的结果,为相关文献做出了贡献。未来的迭代应着眼于通过考虑用户友好性和选择退出活动的能力来优化交付方法。
{"title":"Using a Chat-Based Trivia Activity to Foster Community in Residency.","authors":"Orhue Odaro, Jonathan Lim","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For residency programs rotating at multiple sites, building a strong community can be challenging when house staff are geographically separated. Medical educators have had widespread use of technology to create virtual classrooms, discussion boards, and other activities. Less is known, however, about smaller-scale use of technology such as longitudinal use of chat to engage learners. We developed a chat-based trivia activity using social media tools to promote learning, community, and belonging in a large multisite residency program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residents in our large academic program were invited to participate in a question-based activity called Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays (IMTT) via the chat application GroupMe. Three to five questions were asked of all of the participants using a multimedia format. Question content included topics from the residency didactic curriculum and trivia about program leadership. A voluntary, anonymous survey on the effect of the activity on learning and belonging was sent to all of the residents at the end of the academic year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 224 residents, there were 48 survey respondents (21.4% response rate). When asked about overall satisfaction with the program, 43.8% (21/48) of all of the respondents reported feeling \"somewhat satisfied\" or \"very satisfied.\" Residents who frequently participated in Internal Medicine Trivia Thursdays experienced greater excitement about learning and a greater sense of community compared with those with infrequent to no participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our intervention used a theoretical framework of connectivism to design a virtual learning activity to engage residents, as well as to foster community among residents and between residents and program leadership. We believe this virtual learning experience is low cost and feasible, requiring mostly facilitator time. This study also contributes to the literature by evaluating outcomes related to social belonging and engagement. Future iterations should aim to optimize the methods of delivery by considering user-friendliness and the ability to opt out of the activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Know Your Guidelines Series: The CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain. 了解您的指南系列:美国疾病预防控制中心《阿片类药物治疗疼痛处方临床实践指南》。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001703
Margaux Meilhac, Suzanne Nesbit, Lindsay A Bowman, Rosalyn W Stewart
{"title":"Know Your Guidelines Series: The CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain.","authors":"Margaux Meilhac, Suzanne Nesbit, Lindsay A Bowman, Rosalyn W Stewart","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001703","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiologic Assessment of Craniosynostosis in Mississippi's Pediatric Population from 2015 to 2020. 2015 至 2020 年密西西比州儿科颅骨发育不良流行病学评估。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001706
Martin G McCandless, Madyson I Brown, James M Shiflett, Kristin J Weaver, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries

Objectives: This study aimed to report geographic and demographic patterns of patients with craniosynostosis (CS) treated at Children's of Mississippi, the state's only American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved craniofacial team.

Methods: Patients with CS were treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital cared for by craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons from 2015 to 2020. Demographic, geographic, and CS diagnosis details, including sex, gestational age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and affected cranial suture type(s), number, and associated syndromic diagnosis were collected, including birth county and total live births from state data. Significant differences between prevalence of CS in four regions of Mississippi were examined using two-tailed t tests (P < 0.05).

Results: Among 222,819 live births in Mississippi between 2015 and 2020, 79 pediatric patients presented to Children's of Mississippi with CS, with an overall incidence of 0.355/1000 live births. Most cases were nonsyndromic CS (82%, n = 65) affecting a single major cranial suture (81%, n = 64). The overall incidence of CS was higher in the coastal and central regions compared with northeast Mississippi, at 0.333 and 0.527 vs 0.132/1000 live births (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004), respectively.

Conclusions: Results from this study suggest regional patterns of CS in Mississippi, which may reflect actual incidence patterns or proximity to Children's of Mississippi. Further study could reveal regional differences in risk factors underlying CS incidence or access to specialized CS care for different regions in the state. This will lead to opportunities for institutional outreach to decrease the burden of CS care in Mississippi.

研究目的密西西比儿童医院是密西西比州唯一获得美国腭裂-颅面协会批准的颅面外科团队,本研究旨在报告在该院接受治疗的颅颌面发育不良(CS)患者的地理和人口统计模式:方法:2015 年至 2020 年期间,颅颌面外科医生和神经外科医生在一家三级儿科医院治疗 CS 患者。收集了人口统计学、地理学和 CS 诊断的详细信息,包括性别、胎龄、种族、民族、保险状况、受影响的颅骨缝合类型、数量和相关综合征诊断,包括出生县和各州数据中的活产总数。采用双尾 t 检验(P < 0.05)来检验密西西比州四个地区 CS 患病率之间的显著差异:在密西西比州2015年至2020年间的222,819名活产婴儿中,有79名儿科患者因CS到密西西比儿童医院就诊,总发病率为0.355/1000名活产婴儿。大多数病例为影响单个主要颅缝的非综合征 CS(82%,n = 65)(81%,n = 64)。与密西西比州东北部相比,沿海和中部地区的 CS 总发病率较高,分别为 0.333 和 0.527 vs 0.132/1000 活产(P = 0.012 和 P = 0.004):本研究结果表明,密西西比州的 CS 具有区域性模式,这可能反映了实际发病模式或与密西西比儿童医院的距离。进一步的研究可能会揭示该州不同地区CS发病率或获得专业CS护理的风险因素的地区差异。这将为密西西比州减少 CS 护理负担的机构推广工作提供机会。
{"title":"Epidemiologic Assessment of Craniosynostosis in Mississippi's Pediatric Population from 2015 to 2020.","authors":"Martin G McCandless, Madyson I Brown, James M Shiflett, Kristin J Weaver, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to report geographic and demographic patterns of patients with craniosynostosis (CS) treated at Children's of Mississippi, the state's only American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved craniofacial team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with CS were treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital cared for by craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons from 2015 to 2020. Demographic, geographic, and CS diagnosis details, including sex, gestational age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and affected cranial suture type(s), number, and associated syndromic diagnosis were collected, including birth county and total live births from state data. Significant differences between prevalence of CS in four regions of Mississippi were examined using two-tailed <i>t</i> tests (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 222,819 live births in Mississippi between 2015 and 2020, 79 pediatric patients presented to Children's of Mississippi with CS, with an overall incidence of 0.355/1000 live births. Most cases were nonsyndromic CS (82%, n = 65) affecting a single major cranial suture (81%, n = 64). The overall incidence of CS was higher in the coastal and central regions compared with northeast Mississippi, at 0.333 and 0.527 vs 0.132/1000 live births (<i>P =</i> 0.012 and <i>P</i> = 0.004), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study suggest regional patterns of CS in Mississippi, which may reflect actual incidence patterns or proximity to Children's of Mississippi. Further study could reveal regional differences in risk factors underlying CS incidence or access to specialized CS care for different regions in the state. This will lead to opportunities for institutional outreach to decrease the burden of CS care in Mississippi.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Retention in a Substance Use Disorder Telemedicine Clinic. 药物使用障碍远程医疗诊所的病人保留率。
IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001709
Justine F Maxwell, Sue S Feldman, Li Li

Objectives: Although research has continued to show that substance use disorders (SUDs) can be treated effectively with evidence-based treatment, there continues to be gaps in access, and utilization remains low. Alternative SUD treatment methods, including telemedicine, are increasingly being explored to reach patients where traditional in-person treatment approaches are inaccessible. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore SUD treatment retention, specifically comparing telemedicine-delivered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with a traditional in-person treatment delivery approach.

Methods: Patients at Cahaba Medical Care, an FQHC in Birmingham, AL with a diagnosis of OUD and undergoing buprenorphine/naloxone or buprenorphine treatment were categorized into two groups: treatment and control. The dependent variable, retention to SUD treatment, was assessed at four different time periods over 12 months to determine patient SUD consultation appointment attendance. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between SUD treatment retention and delivery mode. Correlations were obtained to assess associations between frequency of urine drug screens performed and SUD treatment retention.

Results: As the number of the urine drug screens patients received increased by 1, the number of SUD treatment program consultations patients attended increased by 0.69 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SUD treatment retention between traditional in-person and telemedicine delivered approaches, however.

Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that a telemedicine-delivered treatment program equals retention effectiveness when compared with in-person delivery. This suggests that leveraging telemedicine to treat patients with SUD could be an effective alternative for those unable to access treatment or who are less likely to attend or complete traditional in-person treatment sessions.

目标:尽管研究不断表明,药物使用障碍 (SUD) 可以通过循证治疗得到有效治疗,但在获得治疗方面仍然存在差距,而且利用率仍然很低。人们越来越多地探索包括远程医疗在内的其他药物滥用障碍治疗方法,以帮助那些无法获得传统面对面治疗方法的患者。这项横断面研究旨在探讨 SUD 治疗的保留率,特别是将远程医疗提供的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)治疗与传统的面对面治疗方法进行比较:在阿拉巴马州伯明翰的一家 FQHC 卡哈巴医疗保健中心,诊断为 OUD 并接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮或丁丙诺啡治疗的患者被分为两组:治疗组和对照组。因变量 "接受 SUD 治疗的保留率 "在 12 个月内的四个不同时间段进行评估,以确定患者 SUD 咨询预约的出席率。采用多元线性回归的方法来检验 SUD 治疗保留率与提供模式之间的关系。结果显示,尿液药物筛查次数与 SUD 治疗保留率之间存在相关性:当患者接受的尿液药物筛查次数增加 1 次时,患者参加 SUD 治疗项目咨询的次数增加了 0.69 次(P < 0.001)。但是,传统的面对面治疗和远程医疗提供的 SUD 治疗保留率没有明显差异:本研究结果表明,远程医疗提供的治疗方案与面对面提供的治疗方案相比,在保留率方面具有同等效果。这表明,对于那些无法获得治疗或不太可能参加或完成传统面对面治疗的患者来说,利用远程医疗来治疗 SUD 患者不失为一种有效的替代方法。
{"title":"Patient Retention in a Substance Use Disorder Telemedicine Clinic.","authors":"Justine F Maxwell, Sue S Feldman, Li Li","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001709","DOIUrl":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001709","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although research has continued to show that substance use disorders (SUDs) can be treated effectively with evidence-based treatment, there continues to be gaps in access, and utilization remains low. Alternative SUD treatment methods, including telemedicine, are increasingly being explored to reach patients where traditional in-person treatment approaches are inaccessible. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore SUD treatment retention, specifically comparing telemedicine-delivered opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with a traditional in-person treatment delivery approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients at Cahaba Medical Care, an FQHC in Birmingham, AL with a diagnosis of OUD and undergoing buprenorphine/naloxone or buprenorphine treatment were categorized into two groups: treatment and control. The dependent variable, retention to SUD treatment, was assessed at four different time periods over 12 months to determine patient SUD consultation appointment attendance. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship between SUD treatment retention and delivery mode. Correlations were obtained to assess associations between frequency of urine drug screens performed and SUD treatment retention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As the number of the urine drug screens patients received increased by 1, the number of SUD treatment program consultations patients attended increased by 0.69 (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference in SUD treatment retention between traditional in-person and telemedicine delivered approaches, however.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that a telemedicine-delivered treatment program equals retention effectiveness when compared with in-person delivery. This suggests that leveraging telemedicine to treat patients with SUD could be an effective alternative for those unable to access treatment or who are less likely to attend or complete traditional in-person treatment sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141499046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Student and Faculty Perceptions Differ on the Stressors that Medical Students Face. 学生和教师对医学生所面临压力的看法有何不同?
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001697
Katsiaryna Khatskevich, Jiten Patel, Sierra Klein, Lachlan Shiver, Ashley Mason, Danielle Gulick

Objectives: Medical education is notorious for the stress that students face as they strive to succeed both academically and clinically. This stress has been linked to declining academic performance and worsening mental health. To combat these negative outcomes, it is essential for medical school faculty and administration to address common stressors among medical students. No studies have addressed whether medical school faculty and students perceive stressors similarly, however.

Methods: In this two-part study, data collected from medical students in 2021 to 2022 to identify their most significant sources of stress were used to create a survey that queries the frequency and intensity of these stressors. This survey was distributed to medical students and faculty at the same institution. The responses between students and faculty were compared and student data also were analyzed by academic year to observe changes in perception that accompany progression through the medical curriculum.

Results: The results showed that faculty overestimated the impact of certain stressors on medical students (eg, in-house examinations, US Medical Licensing Examination Steps 1 and 2 examinations, and patient interactions). In addition, preclinical students were more concerned with finding extracurricular activities, missing opportunities, and performing research compared with clinical students.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that although faculty anticipated most medical student stressors, there are significant gaps that still need to be addressed to better reduce and respond to the stress experienced by medical students.

目的:医学教育因学生在学业和临床上都要取得成功而面临巨大的压力而声名狼藉。这种压力与学习成绩下降和心理健康恶化有关。为了消除这些负面影响,医学院的教师和管理人员必须解决医学生常见的压力问题。然而,还没有研究探讨医学院教师和学生对压力的感知是否相似:在这项由两部分组成的研究中,从 2021 年至 2022 年的医学生中收集了数据,以确定他们最主要的压力来源,并利用这些数据制作了一份调查表,询问这些压力源的频率和强度。该调查问卷分发给同一院校的医学生和教师。对学生和教师的回答进行了比较,并按学年对学生数据进行了分析,以观察伴随医学课程进展而出现的认知变化:结果表明,教师高估了某些压力因素对医学生的影响(如内部考试、美国医学执业资格考试第 1 和第 2 步考试以及与患者的互动)。此外,与临床学生相比,临床前学生更关注寻找课外活动、错过机会和开展研究:本研究表明,尽管教师们预计到了大多数医学生的压力,但仍有很大差距需要解决,以更好地减轻和应对医学生的压力。
{"title":"How Student and Faculty Perceptions Differ on the Stressors that Medical Students Face.","authors":"Katsiaryna Khatskevich, Jiten Patel, Sierra Klein, Lachlan Shiver, Ashley Mason, Danielle Gulick","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001697","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical education is notorious for the stress that students face as they strive to succeed both academically and clinically. This stress has been linked to declining academic performance and worsening mental health. To combat these negative outcomes, it is essential for medical school faculty and administration to address common stressors among medical students. No studies have addressed whether medical school faculty and students perceive stressors similarly, however.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this two-part study, data collected from medical students in 2021 to 2022 to identify their most significant sources of stress were used to create a survey that queries the frequency and intensity of these stressors. This survey was distributed to medical students and faculty at the same institution. The responses between students and faculty were compared and student data also were analyzed by academic year to observe changes in perception that accompany progression through the medical curriculum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that faculty overestimated the impact of certain stressors on medical students (eg, in-house examinations, US Medical Licensing Examination Steps 1 and 2 examinations, and patient interactions). In addition, preclinical students were more concerned with finding extracurricular activities, missing opportunities, and performing research compared with clinical students.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that although faculty anticipated most medical student stressors, there are significant gaps that still need to be addressed to better reduce and respond to the stress experienced by medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Infant Feeding Experiences and Maternity Care Practices in Appalachia. 探索阿巴拉契亚地区的婴儿喂养经验和产妇护理实践。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001694
Melissa White, Blakeley Griffin, Kylee Phalen, Shivam Patel, Gloria Dudney, Megan Quinn, Kate Beatty

Objectives: Our aim was to explore postpartum individuals' experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding and International Board Certified Lactation Consultants' (IBCLC) knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among their patient populations in Appalachia.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with seven IBCLCs and seven postpartum individuals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted to determine emergent themes and subthemes related to knowledge/perceptions, experiences, and barriers to breastfeeding among postpartum individuals, as well as emergent themes associated with the knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices, easy-/difficult-to-implement Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative maternity care practices, and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among IBCLCs.

Results: Postpartum individuals recruited from an Appalachian obstetrics/gynecology clinic were aware of the benefits of breastfeeding, but their infant feeding journeys were more stressful than they expected, and they had limited access to lactation support and breastfeeding education/information. IBCLCs identified the benefits of the Baby-Friendly maternity care practices but mentioned some risks, especially when there is a lack of communication and coordination among providers. Environmental and informational barriers were identified by both postpartum individuals and IBCLCs as breastfeeding challenges potentially amenable to change.

Conclusions: To support postpartum mothers in the Appalachian region, environmental barriers (eg, lack of lactation support) and informational barriers (eg, lack of prenatal education) need to be addressed.

目标:我们的目的是探讨阿巴拉契亚地区产后妇女对母乳喂养的经验和看法,以及国际母乳喂养咨询师(IBCLC)对产科护理实践的了解和看法,以及他们的病人群体中母乳喂养的障碍:对七名 IBCLC 和七名产后人士进行了半结构式访谈。对访谈进行了录音和转录。对访谈进行了主题分析,以确定与产后人士对母乳喂养的认识/感知、经验和障碍相关的新出现主题和次主题,以及与产妇护理实践的认识和感知、易实施/难实施的爱婴医院倡议产妇护理实践和 IBCLC 对母乳喂养的感知障碍相关的新出现主题:结果:从阿巴拉契亚产科/妇科诊所招募的产后妇女了解母乳喂养的好处,但她们的婴儿喂养历程比她们预期的更紧张,而且她们获得哺乳支持和母乳喂养教育/信息的机会有限。IBCLCs 指出了爱婴产护措施的益处,但也提到了一些风险,尤其是当医疗服务提供者之间缺乏沟通和协调时。产后人士和 IBCLC 都认为环境和信息障碍是母乳喂养可能面临的挑战:为支持阿巴拉契亚地区的产后母亲,需要解决环境障碍(如缺乏哺乳支持)和信息障碍(如缺乏产前教育)。
{"title":"Exploring Infant Feeding Experiences and Maternity Care Practices in Appalachia.","authors":"Melissa White, Blakeley Griffin, Kylee Phalen, Shivam Patel, Gloria Dudney, Megan Quinn, Kate Beatty","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001694","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to explore postpartum individuals' experiences and perceptions of breastfeeding and International Board Certified Lactation Consultants' (IBCLC) knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among their patient populations in Appalachia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with seven IBCLCs and seven postpartum individuals. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted to determine emergent themes and subthemes related to knowledge/perceptions, experiences, and barriers to breastfeeding among postpartum individuals, as well as emergent themes associated with the knowledge and perceptions of maternity care practices, easy-/difficult-to-implement Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative maternity care practices, and perceived barriers to breastfeeding among IBCLCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postpartum individuals recruited from an Appalachian obstetrics/gynecology clinic were aware of the benefits of breastfeeding, but their infant feeding journeys were more stressful than they expected, and they had limited access to lactation support and breastfeeding education/information. IBCLCs identified the benefits of the Baby-Friendly maternity care practices but mentioned some risks, especially when there is a lack of communication and coordination among providers. Environmental and informational barriers were identified by both postpartum individuals and IBCLCs as breastfeeding challenges potentially amenable to change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To support postpartum mothers in the Appalachian region, environmental barriers (eg, lack of lactation support) and informational barriers (eg, lack of prenatal education) need to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Epidemiologic Trends of Cleft Lip and Palate in a Southern State: A 30-Year Follow-Up. 南方某州唇腭裂的流行趋势:30年跟踪调查
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001698
Madyson I Brown, Martin G McCandless, Samuel J Hopper, Eric D Lucas, Brittany N Corder, Laura I Galarza, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries

Objectives: Children's of Mississippi at the University of Mississippi Medical Center serves as the state's only American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved cleft team at the only pediatric hospital in the state. The goal of this study is to report geographic and demographic patterns of patients with orofacial cleft (OFC) treated at Children's of Mississippi, which are lacking.

Methods: Patients with OFC treated at Children's of Mississippi from 2015 to 2020 were included. Demographic data were collected, including birth county and total live births from state data. Significant differences between incidence of OFC among public health regions of Mississippi were examined using analysis of variance (P < 0.05). Cases were compared with historical data from 1980 to 1989.

Results: There were 184 patients who presented with OFC, with a statewide incidence of 0.83 per 1000 live births among 222,819 live births in the state across 6 years. The incidence of OFC was 0.83/1000 for Whites and 0.82/1000 for non-Whites versus a historical rate of 1.36 and 0.54, respectively. Significantly fewer children in the northern region (0.25/1000) were born with OFC than in central (1.21; P < 0.001) and southern (0.86; P < 0.001) regions.

Conclusions: Results from this study suggest changing regional patterns of OFC in Mississippi. Although rates increased among non-White infants, the overall incidence of OFC has decreased compared with historical data. The findings may reflect actual incidence patterns in the state or the proximity of certain regions to Children's of Mississippi. Further study may reveal regional differences in risk factors underlying OFC incidence, and/or issues with access to cleft care for different regions in the state.

目标:密西西比大学医疗中心的密西西比儿童医院是该州唯一一家经美国腭裂颅面协会批准的裂隙治疗小组,也是该州唯一一家儿科医院。本研究的目的是报告在密西西比儿童医院接受治疗的口面裂(OFC)患者的地理和人口统计模式:研究纳入了 2015 年至 2020 年期间在密西西比儿童医院接受治疗的 OFC 患者。方法:纳入 2015 年至 2020 年在密西西比州儿童医院接受治疗的 OFC 患者,并收集人口统计学数据,包括出生县和州数据中的活产总数。通过方差分析(P < 0.05)检验了密西西比州各公共卫生地区 OFC 发病率之间的显著差异。病例与1980年至1989年的历史数据进行了比较:在密西西比州的 222 819 名活产婴儿中,有 184 名患者出现 OFC,全州的发病率为 0.83/1000。白人和非白人的 OFC 发病率分别为 0.83/1000 和 0.82/1000,而历史发病率分别为 1.36 和 0.54。与中部地区(1.21;P <0.001)和南部地区(0.86;P <0.001)相比,北部地区出生时患有 OFC 的儿童明显较少(0.25/1000):本研究结果表明,密西西比州的 OFC 地区模式正在发生变化。虽然非白人婴儿的发病率有所上升,但与历史数据相比,OFC 的总体发病率有所下降。研究结果可能反映了该州的实际发病模式或某些地区与密西西比州儿童医院的邻近程度。进一步的研究可能会揭示该州不同地区 OFC 发病率背后的风险因素的地区差异,以及/或者该州不同地区在获得裂隙护理方面存在的问题。
{"title":"Epidemiologic Trends of Cleft Lip and Palate in a Southern State: A 30-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Madyson I Brown, Martin G McCandless, Samuel J Hopper, Eric D Lucas, Brittany N Corder, Laura I Galarza, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001698","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children's of Mississippi at the University of Mississippi Medical Center serves as the state's only American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved cleft team at the only pediatric hospital in the state. The goal of this study is to report geographic and demographic patterns of patients with orofacial cleft (OFC) treated at Children's of Mississippi, which are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with OFC treated at Children's of Mississippi from 2015 to 2020 were included. Demographic data were collected, including birth county and total live births from state data. Significant differences between incidence of OFC among public health regions of Mississippi were examined using analysis of variance (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Cases were compared with historical data from 1980 to 1989.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 184 patients who presented with OFC, with a statewide incidence of 0.83 per 1000 live births among 222,819 live births in the state across 6 years. The incidence of OFC was 0.83/1000 for Whites and 0.82/1000 for non-Whites versus a historical rate of 1.36 and 0.54, respectively. Significantly fewer children in the northern region (0.25/1000) were born with OFC than in central (1.21; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and southern (0.86; <i>P</i> < 0.001) regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study suggest changing regional patterns of OFC in Mississippi. Although rates increased among non-White infants, the overall incidence of OFC has decreased compared with historical data. The findings may reflect actual incidence patterns in the state or the proximity of certain regions to Children's of Mississippi. Further study may reveal regional differences in risk factors underlying OFC incidence, and/or issues with access to cleft care for different regions in the state.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive Care for Adults with Down Syndrome in Primary Care Settings. 在基层医疗机构为患有唐氏综合症的成年人提供全面护理。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001693
Abtahi Tishad, Siena Vadakal, Jay Talati, Mariam Louis, Rafik Jacob

This review article aims to bridge the knowledge gap in providing comprehensive care to adults with Down syndrome (DS) in primary care settings. Despite the increasing prevalence of adults with DS, there is a significant lack of familiarity and comprehensive guidelines for their health care among primary care physicians. This often results in subpar health promotion, preventive screenings, and individualized care. This article attempts to provide guidance for healthcare providers on previsit preparation, clinic visit characteristics, testing and screening considerations, and decision making/guardianship for adults with DS. By emphasizing a patient-centered approach, this review aims to enhance the quality of care, reduce associated morbidity and mortality, and ultimately improve the health outcomes of adults with DS.

这篇综述文章旨在弥补初级医疗机构在为患有唐氏综合症(DS)的成人提供全面护理方面的知识差距。尽管患有唐氏综合症的成年人越来越多,但初级保健医生对他们的健康护理却非常不熟悉,也缺乏全面的指导方针。这往往导致健康宣传、预防性筛查和个体化护理不尽如人意。本文试图就DS成人的诊前准备、门诊特点、检测和筛查注意事项以及决策/监护等方面为医疗服务提供者提供指导。通过强调以患者为中心的方法,本综述旨在提高护理质量、降低相关发病率和死亡率,并最终改善 DS 成人患者的健康状况。
{"title":"Comprehensive Care for Adults with Down Syndrome in Primary Care Settings.","authors":"Abtahi Tishad, Siena Vadakal, Jay Talati, Mariam Louis, Rafik Jacob","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001693","DOIUrl":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review article aims to bridge the knowledge gap in providing comprehensive care to adults with Down syndrome (DS) in primary care settings. Despite the increasing prevalence of adults with DS, there is a significant lack of familiarity and comprehensive guidelines for their health care among primary care physicians. This often results in subpar health promotion, preventive screenings, and individualized care. This article attempts to provide guidance for healthcare providers on previsit preparation, clinic visit characteristics, testing and screening considerations, and decision making/guardianship for adults with DS. By emphasizing a patient-centered approach, this review aims to enhance the quality of care, reduce associated morbidity and mortality, and ultimately improve the health outcomes of adults with DS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Influencing Vision Health and Eye Care among Older Adults in Northeast Tennessee. 影响田纳西州东北部老年人视力健康和眼科护理的因素。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700
Jodi L Southerland, Muhammad Elahi, Shimin Zheng, Kayla Dodson, Priscilla Rogers, Alberta Orr, DiAnna J Rowe, Hamza Jalal, Siamak Yousefi

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the factors associated with vision impairment (VI), age-related eye disease (ARED), and frequency of eye examinations among older adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional study (N = 166) was designed to identify barriers in vision and eye care services among adults 50 years and older in four counties in Appalachian Tennessee. Surveys were administered in March 2023. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of VI and ARED and the frequency of eye examinations.

Results: In two out of the three regression models, predictors such as traveling >10 mi to an eye care provider, barriers to eye care, and a lack of exposure to eye health information emerged as significant factors. Individuals who traveled >10 mi to an eye care provider were more than twice as likely than individuals who traveled shorter distances to have VI and not maintain routine eye care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-6.75; AOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-7.55, respectively). Reporting barriers to eye care doubled the odds of ARED (AOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.34) and substantially increased the odds of reporting a 3-year or longer interval since the last eye examination (AOR 7.45, 95% CI 1.85-29.96) compared with having no barriers to eye care. Moreover, limited exposure to eye health information tripled the odds of VI (AOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.24) and not maintaining routine eye care (AOR 3.07, 95% CI 0.97-9.70) compared with more exposure to eye health information. Other predictors also were uncovered in the analysis.

Conclusions: This study contributes to the scarce literature on risk factors associated with vision health among older adults in Appalachia.

研究目的本研究旨在探讨与老年人视力损伤(VI)、老年性眼病(ARED)和眼科检查频率相关的因素:设计了一项横断面研究(N = 166),以确定田纳西州阿巴拉契亚地区四个县 50 岁及以上成年人在视力和眼保健服务方面的障碍。调查于 2023 年 3 月进行。采用简单和多元逻辑回归分析来确定视力障碍和急性视力丧失的风险因素以及眼科检查的频率:在三个回归模型中的两个模型中,前往眼科医疗机构的旅行距离大于 10 英里、获得眼科护理的障碍和缺乏眼健康信息等预测因素成为重要因素。与距离较短的人相比,距离眼科医疗机构超过 10 英里的人患有六级视力和不坚持常规眼科护理的可能性是距离较长的人的两倍多(调整后的几率比 [AOR] 分别为 2.69,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 1.08-6.75;AOR 为 2.82,95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 1.05-7.55)。与没有眼科保健障碍的人相比,报告有眼科保健障碍的人患 ARED 的几率增加了一倍(AOR 2.33,95% CI 1.02-5.34),报告距上次眼科检查间隔 3 年或更长时间的几率也大大增加(AOR 7.45,95% CI 1.85-29.96)。此外,与接触眼健康信息较多的人群相比,接触眼健康信息有限的人群报告 VI(AOR 3.26,95% CI 1.15-9.24)和未坚持常规眼保健(AOR 3.07,95% CI 0.97-9.70)的几率是接触眼健康信息较少的人群报告 VI(AOR 3.26,95% CI 1.15-9.24)和未坚持常规眼保健的几率的三倍。分析中还发现了其他预测因素:这项研究为阿巴拉契亚地区老年人视力健康相关风险因素的稀缺文献做出了贡献。
{"title":"Factors Influencing Vision Health and Eye Care among Older Adults in Northeast Tennessee.","authors":"Jodi L Southerland, Muhammad Elahi, Shimin Zheng, Kayla Dodson, Priscilla Rogers, Alberta Orr, DiAnna J Rowe, Hamza Jalal, Siamak Yousefi","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001700","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the factors associated with vision impairment (VI), age-related eye disease (ARED), and frequency of eye examinations among older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study (N = 166) was designed to identify barriers in vision and eye care services among adults 50 years and older in four counties in Appalachian Tennessee. Surveys were administered in March 2023. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to determine the risk factors of VI and ARED and the frequency of eye examinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In two out of the three regression models, predictors such as traveling >10 mi to an eye care provider, barriers to eye care, and a lack of exposure to eye health information emerged as significant factors. Individuals who traveled >10 mi to an eye care provider were more than twice as likely than individuals who traveled shorter distances to have VI and not maintain routine eye care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-6.75; AOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-7.55, respectively). Reporting barriers to eye care doubled the odds of ARED (AOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.02-5.34) and substantially increased the odds of reporting a 3-year or longer interval since the last eye examination (AOR 7.45, 95% CI 1.85-29.96) compared with having no barriers to eye care. Moreover, limited exposure to eye health information tripled the odds of VI (AOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.15-9.24) and not maintaining routine eye care (AOR 3.07, 95% CI 0.97-9.70) compared with more exposure to eye health information. Other predictors also were uncovered in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes to the scarce literature on risk factors associated with vision health among older adults in Appalachia.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Southern Medical Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1