Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001915
Michael J Asken, Anas Atrash, Shirley Ann Pfalaq D Felipe
{"title":"\"Noncompliant\" Is an Adjective, Not an Explanation.","authors":"Michael J Asken, Anas Atrash, Shirley Ann Pfalaq D Felipe","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001915","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"25-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001920
Merry Mathew, Sachi Khemka, Duke Appiah
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the trends in syphilis prevalence in Lubbock County, Texas, from 2018 to 2022 and identify significant changes over time. In addition, it sought to assess the relationship between syphilis trends and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, comparing local patterns to state-level data.
Methods: Data on COVID-19 cases in Lubbock County and Texas from 2018-2022 were obtained from the City of Lubbock Health Department and the Texas Department of State Health Services. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to identify statistically significant changes in the linear trends of the prevalence of syphilis and COVID-19 over time and evaluate disparities in these temporal trends.
Results: There were significant changes in the growth of the number of syphilis cases that coincided with increasing trends in COVID-19. The growth in the trend for these two infections was largely parallel. A similar relationship between syphilis and COVID-19 was observed for the state of Texas, although the growth in the trends of syphilis from 2020 to 2022 was higher in Lubbock County than the growth for Texas.
Conclusions: The data indicate a notable relationship between the growth in the prevalence of syphilis and COVID-19 in Lubbock County and Texas from 2018 to 2022, with estimates for Lubbock County being more pronounced than Texas.
{"title":"Relationship between the Prevalence of Syphilis and COVID-19 in Lubbock County and Texas.","authors":"Merry Mathew, Sachi Khemka, Duke Appiah","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001920","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the trends in syphilis prevalence in Lubbock County, Texas, from 2018 to 2022 and identify significant changes over time. In addition, it sought to assess the relationship between syphilis trends and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, comparing local patterns to state-level data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on COVID-19 cases in Lubbock County and Texas from 2018-2022 were obtained from the City of Lubbock Health Department and the Texas Department of State Health Services. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to identify statistically significant changes in the linear trends of the prevalence of syphilis and COVID-19 over time and evaluate disparities in these temporal trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant changes in the growth of the number of syphilis cases that coincided with increasing trends in COVID-19. The growth in the trend for these two infections was largely parallel. A similar relationship between syphilis and COVID-19 was observed for the state of Texas, although the growth in the trends of syphilis from 2020 to 2022 was higher in Lubbock County than the growth for Texas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data indicate a notable relationship between the growth in the prevalence of syphilis and COVID-19 in Lubbock County and Texas from 2018 to 2022, with estimates for Lubbock County being more pronounced than Texas.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"7-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001924
Zhengxi Chen, Holly Hartman, Abhishek Deshpande
Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects approximately 100 million individuals in the United States. Previous studies have reported a significant association between obesity and MASLD. The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between obesity and population-level trends in MASLD prevalence among US adults aged 20 years and older.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of serial cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles (1999-2018). MASLD was defined using two criteria: (1) US Fatty Liver Index (USFLI) ≥30 or (2) cardiometabolic risk factors (≥1) with controlled attenuation parameter ≥288 dB/m (2017-2018 only). Temporal trends in the prevalence of MASLD and obesity were analyzed using logistic regression with the midpoint of a 2-year survey cycle as a continuous independent variable. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) quantified obesity's association with MASLD trends, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and survey design variables.
Results: Among 17,824 participants, 36.62% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and 33.49% met MASLD criteria (USFLI ≥30). MASLD prevalence increased from 30.20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.57%-33.83%) in 1999-2000 to 38.64% (95% CI 35.47%-41.80%) in 2017-2018 mirroring rising obesity rates (30.26%-43.51%). MASLD prevalence varied significantly across different demographics, with the highest rates observed in older adults, males, and Mexican Americans. Obesity was associated with a 14.05-fold higher odds of MASLD (95% CI 12.62-15.65).
Conclusions: MASLD prevalence trends closely parallel the obesity epidemic, with obesity strongly associated with MASLD risk. The differential prevalence rates among older adults, males, and Mexican Americans highlight the need for targeted prevention strategies, including obesity management.
目的:代谢功能障碍相关的脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)在美国影响了大约1亿人。先前的研究报告了肥胖和MASLD之间的显著关联。本研究的目的是研究肥胖与20岁及以上美国成年人MASLD患病率的人口水平趋势之间的关系。方法:我们对1999-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查周期的一系列横断面数据进行了回顾性分析。MASLD的定义采用两个标准:(1)美国脂肪肝指数(USFLI)≥30或(2)心脏代谢危险因素(≥1),控制衰减参数≥288 dB/m(仅限2017-2018年)。使用logistic回归分析MASLD和肥胖患病率的时间趋势,以2年调查周期的中点作为连续自变量。校正比值比(ORs)量化了肥胖与MASLD趋势的关系,控制了年龄、性别、种族/民族和调查设计变量。结果:在17824名参与者中,36.62%的人肥胖(体重指数≥30 kg/m2), 33.49%的人符合MASLD标准(USFLI≥30)。MASLD患病率从1999-2000年的30.20%(95%可信区间[CI] 26.57%-33.83%)上升至2017-2018年的38.64%(95%可信区间[CI] 35.47%-41.80%),反映了肥胖率的上升(30.26%-43.51%)。MASLD的患病率在不同的人口统计数据中差异很大,在老年人、男性和墨西哥裔美国人中观察到的发病率最高。肥胖与MASLD的发生率增高14.05倍相关(95% CI 12.62-15.65)。结论:MASLD的流行趋势与肥胖流行趋势密切相关,肥胖与MASLD风险密切相关。老年人、男性和墨西哥裔美国人之间的患病率差异突出了有针对性的预防策略的必要性,包括肥胖管理。
{"title":"Prevalence and Trends of Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease among Adults in the United States.","authors":"Zhengxi Chen, Holly Hartman, Abhishek Deshpande","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001924","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects approximately 100 million individuals in the United States. Previous studies have reported a significant association between obesity and MASLD. The objective of our study was to examine the relationship between obesity and population-level trends in MASLD prevalence among US adults aged 20 years and older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of serial cross-sectional data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles (1999-2018). MASLD was defined using two criteria: (1) US Fatty Liver Index (USFLI) ≥30 or (2) cardiometabolic risk factors (≥1) with controlled attenuation parameter ≥288 dB/m (2017-2018 only). Temporal trends in the prevalence of MASLD and obesity were analyzed using logistic regression with the midpoint of a 2-year survey cycle as a continuous independent variable. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) quantified obesity's association with MASLD trends, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and survey design variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17,824 participants, 36.62% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and 33.49% met MASLD criteria (USFLI ≥30). MASLD prevalence increased from 30.20% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.57%-33.83%) in 1999-2000 to 38.64% (95% CI 35.47%-41.80%) in 2017-2018 mirroring rising obesity rates (30.26%-43.51%). MASLD prevalence varied significantly across different demographics, with the highest rates observed in older adults, males, and Mexican Americans. Obesity was associated with a 14.05-fold higher odds of MASLD (95% CI 12.62-15.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MASLD prevalence trends closely parallel the obesity epidemic, with obesity strongly associated with MASLD risk. The differential prevalence rates among older adults, males, and Mexican Americans highlight the need for targeted prevention strategies, including obesity management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145946423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001910
Sara N Abate, Brook T Alemu, Olaniyi Olayinka
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the incidence, hospital resource utilization, and risk factors associated with anesthesia-related complications during labor and delivery in North Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2015-2020 State Inpatient Database, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a representative sample of hospital deliveries involving anesthesia-related complications. The State Inpatient Database is a collection of databases and software tools created for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, which compiles inpatient discharge records from community hospitals across selected states. A combination of <i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification</i> codes, <i>International Classification of Diseases,10th Revision, Procedure Coding System</i> codes, and <i>Diagnosis Related Groups</i> was used to extract variables. Descriptive statistics, proportions, and incidence rates of anesthesia-related complications were calculated. Simple and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with an increased likelihood of anesthesia-related complications. A stepwise regression approach was used to fit the model. The calibration of the model was assessed using the deviance-Pearson goodness-of-fit statistics. To assess the cost associated with anesthesia-related complications, we compared the mean length of stay and total hospital charges between deliveries with and without anesthesia-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 592,868 hospital deliveries in North Carolina between 2015 and 2020, anesthesia-related complications were identified in 1735 cases, corresponding to an incidence rate of 2.9/1000 discharges (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.0). Spinal cord complications were the most prevalent (73.9%), followed by adverse effects (20.2%) and systemic complications (5.9%). During the 6-year study period, spinal cord complications increased from 65% to 70%, systemic complications rose from 5% to 9%, and adverse effects decreased from 30% to 20%. The highest incidence rates (per 100 discharges) were observed among women aged 40 to 55 years, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals (0.31), those with nontraditional insurance payers (0.39), patients undergoing more than three hospital procedures (0.49), those with a length of stay exceeding 3 days (0.57), women from higher-income households (0.32), and those with a higher (≥1) Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.41). Approximately 30% of deliveries were performed via cesarean section, with 37% of these cases associated with anesthesia-related complications. In the adjusted multivariable regression analyses, a higher risk of anesthesia-related complications also was observed among cesarean section deliveries, admissions to rural hospitals, other payers, and patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Al
{"title":"Statewide Analysis of Anesthesia-Related Complications in Labor and Delivery: North Carolina, 2015-2020.","authors":"Sara N Abate, Brook T Alemu, Olaniyi Olayinka","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001910","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the incidence, hospital resource utilization, and risk factors associated with anesthesia-related complications during labor and delivery in North Carolina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the 2015-2020 State Inpatient Database, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a representative sample of hospital deliveries involving anesthesia-related complications. The State Inpatient Database is a collection of databases and software tools created for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, which compiles inpatient discharge records from community hospitals across selected states. A combination of <i>International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification</i> codes, <i>International Classification of Diseases,10th Revision, Procedure Coding System</i> codes, and <i>Diagnosis Related Groups</i> was used to extract variables. Descriptive statistics, proportions, and incidence rates of anesthesia-related complications were calculated. Simple and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with an increased likelihood of anesthesia-related complications. A stepwise regression approach was used to fit the model. The calibration of the model was assessed using the deviance-Pearson goodness-of-fit statistics. To assess the cost associated with anesthesia-related complications, we compared the mean length of stay and total hospital charges between deliveries with and without anesthesia-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 592,868 hospital deliveries in North Carolina between 2015 and 2020, anesthesia-related complications were identified in 1735 cases, corresponding to an incidence rate of 2.9/1000 discharges (95% confidence interval 2.7-3.0). Spinal cord complications were the most prevalent (73.9%), followed by adverse effects (20.2%) and systemic complications (5.9%). During the 6-year study period, spinal cord complications increased from 65% to 70%, systemic complications rose from 5% to 9%, and adverse effects decreased from 30% to 20%. The highest incidence rates (per 100 discharges) were observed among women aged 40 to 55 years, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals (0.31), those with nontraditional insurance payers (0.39), patients undergoing more than three hospital procedures (0.49), those with a length of stay exceeding 3 days (0.57), women from higher-income households (0.32), and those with a higher (≥1) Charlson Comorbidity Index (0.41). Approximately 30% of deliveries were performed via cesarean section, with 37% of these cases associated with anesthesia-related complications. In the adjusted multivariable regression analyses, a higher risk of anesthesia-related complications also was observed among cesarean section deliveries, admissions to rural hospitals, other payers, and patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of ≥1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Al","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"743-748"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001912
Nicolas Abchee, Eric Han, Elena Encinas, Candice Keogh, Monica Rodriguez Fernandez, Rami Hatem, Brianna Simmons, Catherine Paciotti, Matthew McCabe, Hechu Li Prasada, Jessica Portillo
Objectives: Food insecurity has been rising in the United States, disproportionally affecting populations with no insurance, low socioeconomic status, and racial minorities. It is associated with overall poorer health, especially in terms of glycemic control, mental health, and cardiovascular disease. Addressing it is critical because although studies show its significance, most physicians do not screen for different social determinants of health, including food insecurity.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of household food security status was performed on 209 patients from June to August 2021 at the University of Florida's Springhill Clinic (run by Internal Medicine) and the Equal Access Clinic, a student-run free clinic. The US Department of Agriculture's Spanish and English versions of the Household Food Security Survey were used. The χ2 tests were used to determine whether the number of respondents in each food security category varied significantly by sex, age group, primary language, presence of children in the home, insurance status, and clinic site.
Results: Among the 209 participants, food insecurity was reported by 23.4% of patients. The only statistically significant sociodemographic factors that corresponded to food security status levels were the patient's insurance status and clinic site. A total of 82.6% of insured patients were food secure, whereas only 65.2% of uninsured patients were food secure. A total of 14.5% of Equal Access Clinic patients experience severe food insecurity, whereas 0% of patients at the Springhill Clinic do. The χ2 tests determined that the number of respondents in each food security category varied significantly by insurance status (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: This study highlights the prevalence of food insecurity at primary care clinics, especially student-run clinics. Although limited by sample size and cultural barriers of the given survey, the findings emphasize the gap in standardized screening protocols for food security and the importance of physician sensitivity. Addressing this topic can improve food security and the health benefits that follow through early intervention.
{"title":"Assessing Food Insecurity in Primary Care: A Comparison Between an Internal Medicine- and a Student-Run Clinic.","authors":"Nicolas Abchee, Eric Han, Elena Encinas, Candice Keogh, Monica Rodriguez Fernandez, Rami Hatem, Brianna Simmons, Catherine Paciotti, Matthew McCabe, Hechu Li Prasada, Jessica Portillo","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Food insecurity has been rising in the United States, disproportionally affecting populations with no insurance, low socioeconomic status, and racial minorities. It is associated with overall poorer health, especially in terms of glycemic control, mental health, and cardiovascular disease. Addressing it is critical because although studies show its significance, most physicians do not screen for different social determinants of health, including food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of household food security status was performed on 209 patients from June to August 2021 at the University of Florida's Springhill Clinic (run by Internal Medicine) and the Equal Access Clinic, a student-run free clinic. The US Department of Agriculture's Spanish and English versions of the Household Food Security Survey were used. The χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to determine whether the number of respondents in each food security category varied significantly by sex, age group, primary language, presence of children in the home, insurance status, and clinic site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 209 participants, food insecurity was reported by 23.4% of patients. The only statistically significant sociodemographic factors that corresponded to food security status levels were the patient's insurance status and clinic site. A total of 82.6% of insured patients were food secure, whereas only 65.2% of uninsured patients were food secure. A total of 14.5% of Equal Access Clinic patients experience severe food insecurity, whereas 0% of patients at the Springhill Clinic do. The χ<sup>2</sup> tests determined that the number of respondents in each food security category varied significantly by insurance status (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the prevalence of food insecurity at primary care clinics, especially student-run clinics. Although limited by sample size and cultural barriers of the given survey, the findings emphasize the gap in standardized screening protocols for food security and the importance of physician sensitivity. Addressing this topic can improve food security and the health benefits that follow through early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"778-782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001906
Gregory R Vance, Clay B Thames, Evan C Bowen, Bradley F Hathaway, Marc E Walker, Mark A Dodson
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand maneuvers commonly used to clinically diagnose De Quervain tenosynovitis (DQT) possess differing intrinsic levels of discomfort. We hypothesized that assessing the degree of pain would better differentiate replication of condition-related pain than a binary "yes or no" assessment, and we hope to use these data to establish thresholds on a Likert pain scale for these tests to designate a positive or negative result. Attempting to minimize false positives associated with a binary positive or negative result may result in the reduction of delayed or inappropriate management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three adult patients were administered four provocative hand maneuvers classically used for clinical DQT diagnosis-Eichhoff test (ET), Finkelstein test (FT), the wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test (WHATT), and the radial synergy test (RST)-as well as an experimental maneuver, the first dorsal compartment test (FDCT). Qualified personnel performed each of these tests on both hands of all of the participants. Participants were asked whether each maneuver elicited pain to assess a binary positive or negative result. If positive, then participants were asked to give a 1 to 10 pain rating. Negative results were assigned a pain rating of 0. Participants were divided into two groups based on the relation of their visit diagnosis to the hand or wrist. The χ<sup>2</sup> tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare binary results. Paired <i>t</i> tests and analysis of variance were used for patient-reported pain rating comparison. Significance was determined using <i>P <</i> 0.05 for all of the tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was found in binary pain results between tests in both the dominant and nondominant hands, with ET showing the highest rate of positive response. Only FT and WHATT, however, were found to have a significantly higher rate of positive response in the dominant hand among the hand diagnosis group. No statistically significant findings were discovered in the nondominant hand between those with and without hand diagnoses. A significant difference between self-reported pain intensity also was found between tests in the dominant hand among the entire cohort. Similar to the binary results, ET demonstrated a significantly higher mean pain rating than FT, RST, and FDCT in the dominant hand across the entire cohort. This was maintained in the nondominant hand for RST and FDCT. Those with a hand-related diagnosis reported significantly increased levels of pain in their dominant hand due to ET, FT, and WHATT compared with those without a hand-related diagnosis. Of the 22 participants with a hand-related complaint, only two had a diagnosis of DQT during their visit. For each test with a positive result in these patients, the respective Likert score was 8 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current analysis calls for implementation of a pain
{"title":"Self-Reported Pain Rating during Clinical Testing and De Quervain Tenosynovitis.","authors":"Gregory R Vance, Clay B Thames, Evan C Bowen, Bradley F Hathaway, Marc E Walker, Mark A Dodson","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hand maneuvers commonly used to clinically diagnose De Quervain tenosynovitis (DQT) possess differing intrinsic levels of discomfort. We hypothesized that assessing the degree of pain would better differentiate replication of condition-related pain than a binary \"yes or no\" assessment, and we hope to use these data to establish thresholds on a Likert pain scale for these tests to designate a positive or negative result. Attempting to minimize false positives associated with a binary positive or negative result may result in the reduction of delayed or inappropriate management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-three adult patients were administered four provocative hand maneuvers classically used for clinical DQT diagnosis-Eichhoff test (ET), Finkelstein test (FT), the wrist hyperflexion and abduction of the thumb test (WHATT), and the radial synergy test (RST)-as well as an experimental maneuver, the first dorsal compartment test (FDCT). Qualified personnel performed each of these tests on both hands of all of the participants. Participants were asked whether each maneuver elicited pain to assess a binary positive or negative result. If positive, then participants were asked to give a 1 to 10 pain rating. Negative results were assigned a pain rating of 0. Participants were divided into two groups based on the relation of their visit diagnosis to the hand or wrist. The χ<sup>2</sup> tests and Fisher exact tests were used to compare binary results. Paired <i>t</i> tests and analysis of variance were used for patient-reported pain rating comparison. Significance was determined using <i>P <</i> 0.05 for all of the tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference was found in binary pain results between tests in both the dominant and nondominant hands, with ET showing the highest rate of positive response. Only FT and WHATT, however, were found to have a significantly higher rate of positive response in the dominant hand among the hand diagnosis group. No statistically significant findings were discovered in the nondominant hand between those with and without hand diagnoses. A significant difference between self-reported pain intensity also was found between tests in the dominant hand among the entire cohort. Similar to the binary results, ET demonstrated a significantly higher mean pain rating than FT, RST, and FDCT in the dominant hand across the entire cohort. This was maintained in the nondominant hand for RST and FDCT. Those with a hand-related diagnosis reported significantly increased levels of pain in their dominant hand due to ET, FT, and WHATT compared with those without a hand-related diagnosis. Of the 22 participants with a hand-related complaint, only two had a diagnosis of DQT during their visit. For each test with a positive result in these patients, the respective Likert score was 8 or higher.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current analysis calls for implementation of a pain ","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"775-777"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001911
Blake C Martin, Juan Lopez-Alvarenga, Michael D Sander
Objectives: The Rio Grande Valley (RGV) is a developing clinical research region characterized by its distinctive demographic profile that offers an opportunity to investigate diverse health issues. This pilot investigation sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics linked to bone metastases and primary malignant bone neoplasms (PMBNs) in patients from the RGV and to compare the frequency of these conditions with the US general population.
Methods: This was a retrospective chart review in which data were gathered from the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley UTHealth electronic database from January 1, 2018 to September 4, 2024. Various statistical analyses were performed to assess the demographic and clinical data.
Results: Individuals in the RGV are more likely to develop a PMBN (P < 0.0163) but less likely to have bone metastasis (P < 0.0015) compared with the general US population. Regarding bone metastases and PMBN, although not statistically significant, patients with bone metastasis were 10 years older on average and exhibited a lower body mass index (-1.7 kg/m2) and weight (-17.6 kg) than those with PMBN.
Conclusions: Our initial research indicates age and body weight variations among individuals with bone metastases and PMBN in the RGV, as well as differences in frequency of bone metastases and PMBN in this medically underserved region compared with the general US population. Despite the limited sample size, our results necessitate further exploration in a larger cohort to elucidate any demographic and clinical differences in bone metastases and PMBN subtypes in medically underserved areas.
{"title":"Exploring Bone Oncology in a Medically Underserved Area: A Retrospective Cohort of Bone Metastases and Malignant Bone Neoplasia in the Rio Grande Valley.","authors":"Blake C Martin, Juan Lopez-Alvarenga, Michael D Sander","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001911","DOIUrl":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Rio Grande Valley (RGV) is a developing clinical research region characterized by its distinctive demographic profile that offers an opportunity to investigate diverse health issues. This pilot investigation sought to evaluate the demographic and clinical characteristics linked to bone metastases and primary malignant bone neoplasms (PMBNs) in patients from the RGV and to compare the frequency of these conditions with the US general population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective chart review in which data were gathered from the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley UTHealth electronic database from January 1, 2018 to September 4, 2024. Various statistical analyses were performed to assess the demographic and clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals in the RGV are more likely to develop a PMBN (<i>P</i> < 0.0163) but less likely to have bone metastasis (<i>P <</i> 0.0015) compared with the general US population. Regarding bone metastases and PMBN, although not statistically significant, patients with bone metastasis were 10 years older on average and exhibited a lower body mass index (-1.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and weight (-17.6 kg) than those with PMBN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our initial research indicates age and body weight variations among individuals with bone metastases and PMBN in the RGV, as well as differences in frequency of bone metastases and PMBN in this medically underserved region compared with the general US population. Despite the limited sample size, our results necessitate further exploration in a larger cohort to elucidate any demographic and clinical differences in bone metastases and PMBN subtypes in medically underserved areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"768-771"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001904
Gabriele A Halpern, Marko Nemet, Sergej Abramovich, Ibrahim Serhat Karakus, Juan P Garcia-Mendez, Aysun Tekin, Diksha M Gowda, Oguz Kilickaya, Leslie C Hassett, Amos Lal
Objectives: Recent literature suggests that hospitalization may lead to new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (NODM2). Understanding this relationship is crucial for developing interventions that could reduce long-term complications and healthcare costs associated with DM2 and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the incidence of NODM2 and MACE in patients after hospitalization.
Methods: With the assistance of the Mayo Clinic Libraries, we searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus for medical literature reporting the incidence of NODM2 and the presence of MACE in hospitalized patients from database inception to March 2024. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines.
Results: Among the 168,673 patients from 25 studies, 7677 developed NODM2 after hospitalization (4.5%). The pooled incidence rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval 5.5%-14.1%, P < 0.001). An exploratory analysis comparing patients' glycemic statuses showed a significantly increased risk of NODM2 development after hospitalization among patients with impaired glucose tolerance or stress hyperglycemia compared to normoglycemia group. Only one eligible study reported any MACE outcomes, and meta-analysis could not be performed to assess the effects of hospitalization on MACE.
Conclusions: This study highlights the high rate of NODM2 development after hospitalization. Growing evidence suggests that it may lead to long-term metabolic complications, particularly in patients who experienced dysglycemia during illness.
{"title":"New-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Critical Illness Survivors and after Hospitalization.","authors":"Gabriele A Halpern, Marko Nemet, Sergej Abramovich, Ibrahim Serhat Karakus, Juan P Garcia-Mendez, Aysun Tekin, Diksha M Gowda, Oguz Kilickaya, Leslie C Hassett, Amos Lal","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001904","DOIUrl":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent literature suggests that hospitalization may lead to new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (NODM2). Understanding this relationship is crucial for developing interventions that could reduce long-term complications and healthcare costs associated with DM2 and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the incidence of NODM2 and MACE in patients after hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With the assistance of the Mayo Clinic Libraries, we searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus for medical literature reporting the incidence of NODM2 and the presence of MACE in hospitalized patients from database inception to March 2024. The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 168,673 patients from 25 studies, 7677 developed NODM2 after hospitalization (4.5%). The pooled incidence rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval 5.5%-14.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). An exploratory analysis comparing patients' glycemic statuses showed a significantly increased risk of NODM2 development after hospitalization among patients with impaired glucose tolerance or stress hyperglycemia compared to normoglycemia group. Only one eligible study reported any MACE outcomes, and meta-analysis could not be performed to assess the effects of hospitalization on MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the high rate of NODM2 development after hospitalization. Growing evidence suggests that it may lead to long-term metabolic complications, particularly in patients who experienced dysglycemia during illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"761-767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001909
Elizabeth E Stanley, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Victoria Criswell, Ava Rezaee, Laura Lipold, Kathryn A Martinez
Objectives: Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) refers to problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affecting approximately 12% of US women. Although FSD can be managed in primary care, most primary care clinicians do not regularly treat it. This survey of primary care clinicians practicing at a large US health system assessed perspectives on managing sexual dysfunction compared with other conditions, knowledge of prevalence of sexual dysfunction, and which specialty should be responsible for treating FSD.
Methods: We described the distribution of clinicians' survey responses. Of the 527 invited, 80 completed the survey (response rate: 15%). Most were women (68%), physicians (52%), and had >15 years of experience (43%).
Results: The majority (88%) reported treating FSD is as important as treating other conditions that affect quality of life. Two-thirds reported disorders of desire, arousal, and orgasm could be managed in primary care, and 64% believed that pain with intercourse, typically addressed by Obstetrics/Gynecology, should be handled in primary care. Most primary care clinicians believed that treating FSD was at least as important as treating other conditions, yet up to one-third believed this responsibility should be left to a different specialty.
Conclusions: Educational interventions targeting primary care clinicians may increase the number who take on FSD management.
{"title":"Primary Care Clinicians' Knowledge and Perspectives about Sexual Dysfunction.","authors":"Elizabeth E Stanley, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Victoria Criswell, Ava Rezaee, Laura Lipold, Kathryn A Martinez","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) refers to problems with desire, arousal, orgasm, or pain, affecting approximately 12% of US women. Although FSD can be managed in primary care, most primary care clinicians do not regularly treat it. This survey of primary care clinicians practicing at a large US health system assessed perspectives on managing sexual dysfunction compared with other conditions, knowledge of prevalence of sexual dysfunction, and which specialty should be responsible for treating FSD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We described the distribution of clinicians' survey responses. Of the 527 invited, 80 completed the survey (response rate: 15%). Most were women (68%), physicians (52%), and had >15 years of experience (43%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (88%) reported treating FSD is as important as treating other conditions that affect quality of life. Two-thirds reported disorders of desire, arousal, and orgasm could be managed in primary care, and 64% believed that pain with intercourse, typically addressed by Obstetrics/Gynecology, should be handled in primary care. Most primary care clinicians believed that treating FSD was at least as important as treating other conditions, yet up to one-third believed this responsibility should be left to a different specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Educational interventions targeting primary care clinicians may increase the number who take on FSD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"749-753"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001913
Kain Kim, Sarah Joseph, James Pennoyer, Hanna Freedman
Objectives: Hospital rounding practices have shifted away from being conducted at the patient's bedside to favor rounding in workrooms. Prior studies assessing learner attitudes toward bedside rounds largely focused on its educational value for residents, with less attention paid to medical students or other relevant domains in the learner experience. We sought to comprehensively capture resident and medical student perceptions of bedside rounds and their effects on various key domains, as well as elucidate common barriers to bedside rounding.
Methods: All residents and medical students who participated in teaching rounds in Internal Medicine at one large academic medical center in 2024 were invited to complete a voluntary anonymous survey. Participants also had the opportunity to partake in structured qualitative interviews, which were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to examine learners' perspectives on the impact of rounding setting on each of the key domains.
Results: Seventy-seven residents and 112 medical students completed the survey (response rates of 45% and 39%, respectively), and 18 interviews were conducted (10 residents and 8 medical students). Overall, both residents and medical students had a majority preference for either table or hybrid rounding over bedside rounding in nearly every domain.
Conclusions: Medical students overall identified more positive aspects of bedside rounding, particularly in regard to its potential to introduce opportunities for teaching or improved patient care. These findings may help institutions develop guidelines and faculty development practices for improving learner receptivity and engagement with bedside rounds.
{"title":"Impact of Rounding Setting on the Quality of Medical Trainee Experience.","authors":"Kain Kim, Sarah Joseph, James Pennoyer, Hanna Freedman","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001913","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hospital rounding practices have shifted away from being conducted at the patient's bedside to favor rounding in workrooms. Prior studies assessing learner attitudes toward bedside rounds largely focused on its educational value for residents, with less attention paid to medical students or other relevant domains in the learner experience. We sought to comprehensively capture resident and medical student perceptions of bedside rounds and their effects on various key domains, as well as elucidate common barriers to bedside rounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All residents and medical students who participated in teaching rounds in Internal Medicine at one large academic medical center in 2024 were invited to complete a voluntary anonymous survey. Participants also had the opportunity to partake in structured qualitative interviews, which were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to examine learners' perspectives on the impact of rounding setting on each of the key domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven residents and 112 medical students completed the survey (response rates of 45% and 39%, respectively), and 18 interviews were conducted (10 residents and 8 medical students). Overall, both residents and medical students had a majority preference for either table or hybrid rounding over bedside rounding in nearly every domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical students overall identified more positive aspects of bedside rounding, particularly in regard to its potential to introduce opportunities for teaching or improved patient care. These findings may help institutions develop guidelines and faculty development practices for improving learner receptivity and engagement with bedside rounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 12","pages":"783-789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145669732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}