首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh. 使用可吸收-永久性混合腹膜前网片进行腹股沟疝修补术
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001327
Matthew I Goldblatt, Matthew Reynolds, Carl R Doerhoff, Karl LeBlanc, Mario Leyba, Eric J Mallico, John G Linn

Objective: To analyze device safety and clinical outcomes of ventral hernia repair with the GORE SYNECOR Preperitoneal Biomaterial (PRE device), a permanent high-strength mesh with bioabsorbable web scaffold technology.

Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective review analyzed device/procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes in patients treated for hernia repair ≥1 year from study enrollment.

Results: Included in this analysis were 148 patients with a mean age of 56 years; 66.2% met the Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 2 classification. Median hernia size was 30.0 cm 2 and 58.8% of patients had an incisional hernia. Repairs were primarily a robotic (53.4%) or open approach (41.9%). All meshes were placed extraperitoneal. Procedure-related adverse events within 30 days occurred in 13 (8.8%) patients and included 7 (4.8%) patients with surgical site infection, 2 (1.4%) with surgical site occurrence (SSO), 4 (2.7%) requiring readmission, and 3 (2.0%) who had reoperation. The rate of SSO events requiring procedural intervention was 2.7% (4 patients) through 30 days and 3.4% (5 patients) at 12 months. The rate of procedure-related surgical site infection remained at 4.8% through 12 months (no further reports after 30 d) and 3.4% for SSO (2 reports after 30 d). There were no site-reported clinically diagnosed hernia recurrences throughout the study. Median patient follow-up including in-person visit, physical examination, reported adverse event, explant, death, and questionnaire response was 28 months (n = 148). Median patient follow-up with patient questionnaire was 36 months (n = 88).

Conclusions: Use of the PRE device, which incorporates the proven advantages of both an absorbable synthetic mesh and the long-term durability of a permanent macroporous mesh, is safe and effective in complex ventral hernia repairs. When used in the retromuscular space, the combination of these 2 materials had lower wound complications and recurrence rates than either type of material alone.

目的分析使用 GORE SYNECOR 腹膜前生物材料(PRE 装置)进行腹股沟疝修补术的装置安全性和临床结果:这项多中心回顾性研究分析了自研究入选起≥1 年的疝修补术患者的设备/手术终点和患者报告的结果:纳入本次分析的患者有 148 名,平均年龄 56 岁;66.2% 的患者符合腹股沟疝工作组 2 级分类。疝中位大小为 30.0 平方厘米,58.8% 的患者为切口疝。修复方法主要为机器人(53.4%)或开放式(41.9%)。所有网片都放置在腹膜外。13名(8.8%)患者在30天内发生了与手术相关的不良事件,其中7名(4.8%)患者出现手术部位感染,2名(1.4%)患者出现手术部位感染(SSO),4名(2.7%)患者需要再次入院,3名(2.0%)患者需要再次手术。30 天内需要进行手术干预的手术部位感染率为 2.7%(4 名患者),12 个月内为 3.4%(5 名患者)。手术相关的手术部位感染率在 12 个月内仍为 4.8%(30 天后无进一步报告),SSO 感染率为 3.4%(30 天后有 2 例报告)。在整个研究过程中,没有现场报告的临床诊断疝气复发。患者随访的中位数为 28 个月(n = 148),包括亲自到访、体检、不良事件报告、手术切除、死亡和问卷回复。患者问卷随访的中位数为 36 个月(n = 88):结论:PRE 装置兼具可吸收合成网片和永久性大孔网片长期耐用的优点,在复杂腹股沟疝修补术中安全有效。在肌肉后间隙使用这两种材料时,其伤口并发症和复发率均低于单独使用其中一种材料。
{"title":"Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh.","authors":"Matthew I Goldblatt, Matthew Reynolds, Carl R Doerhoff, Karl LeBlanc, Mario Leyba, Eric J Mallico, John G Linn","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001327","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze device safety and clinical outcomes of ventral hernia repair with the GORE SYNECOR Preperitoneal Biomaterial (PRE device), a permanent high-strength mesh with bioabsorbable web scaffold technology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective review analyzed device/procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes in patients treated for hernia repair ≥1 year from study enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included in this analysis were 148 patients with a mean age of 56 years; 66.2% met the Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 2 classification. Median hernia size was 30.0 cm 2 and 58.8% of patients had an incisional hernia. Repairs were primarily a robotic (53.4%) or open approach (41.9%). All meshes were placed extraperitoneal. Procedure-related adverse events within 30 days occurred in 13 (8.8%) patients and included 7 (4.8%) patients with surgical site infection, 2 (1.4%) with surgical site occurrence (SSO), 4 (2.7%) requiring readmission, and 3 (2.0%) who had reoperation. The rate of SSO events requiring procedural intervention was 2.7% (4 patients) through 30 days and 3.4% (5 patients) at 12 months. The rate of procedure-related surgical site infection remained at 4.8% through 12 months (no further reports after 30 d) and 3.4% for SSO (2 reports after 30 d). There were no site-reported clinically diagnosed hernia recurrences throughout the study. Median patient follow-up including in-person visit, physical examination, reported adverse event, explant, death, and questionnaire response was 28 months (n = 148). Median patient follow-up with patient questionnaire was 36 months (n = 88).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of the PRE device, which incorporates the proven advantages of both an absorbable synthetic mesh and the long-term durability of a permanent macroporous mesh, is safe and effective in complex ventral hernia repairs. When used in the retromuscular space, the combination of these 2 materials had lower wound complications and recurrence rates than either type of material alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"596-602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11614456/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142393517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of CT-guided Core Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Tumors: An Initial Evaluation in Modern Oncology. CT 引导下核心针活检在胰腺肿瘤中的作用:现代肿瘤学的初步评估。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001319
Eduardo P Eyheremendy, Cristian A Angeramo, Patricio Méndez

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently become the standard of care for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and there have even been numerous reports evaluating its potential benefits in resectable PDAC. However, neoadjuvant therapy first requires a histological or cytological diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the safety and diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB).

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with pancreatic tumor requiring a CNB during the period 2015 to 2023 were included. Biopsies were performed with an 18-20 G Tru-Core needle using a coaxial system and automatic biopsy gun. Demographics, procedural variables, postoperative outcomes, and histological results were analyzed.

Results: A total of 43 pancreatic biopsies were performed in 42 patients. The mean age was 60 years (35 to 81 y), and 24 (56%) were males. Tumors were more frequently localized in the head (42%) and body (42%) of the pancreas. The mean size of the pancreatic lesions was 53.77 mm (17 to 181 mm) and the mean number of samples per biopsy was 4 (1 to 12). Most procedures were performed via direct access (81%). No major complications were observed. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 40 (93%) patients, with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100% and an overall accuracy rate of 93%. The probability of performing a molecular diagnostic test increased with the year of biopsy (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.33-8.40, P =0.01).

Conclusions: CNB is an efficient and safe method for obtaining high-quality material. This approach could be essential as molecular profiling continues to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of PDAC.

目的:新辅助化疗最近已成为可切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的标准治疗方法,甚至有许多报告评估了新辅助化疗对可切除PDAC的潜在益处。然而,新辅助治疗首先需要组织学或细胞学诊断。本研究旨在分析CT引导下核心针活检(CNB)的安全性和诊断率:回顾性分析了2015年至2023年期间需要进行CNB的胰腺肿瘤患者。活检使用 18-20 G Tru-Core 穿刺针,使用同轴系统和自动活检枪进行。对人口统计学、手术变量、术后结果和组织学结果进行了分析:结果:42 名患者共进行了 43 例胰腺活检。平均年龄为 60 岁(35 至 81 岁),男性 24 人(56%)。肿瘤多位于胰腺头部(42%)和胰腺体部(42%)。胰腺病变的平均大小为 53.77 毫米(17 至 181 毫米),每次活检的平均样本数为 4 个(1 至 12 个)。大多数手术都是通过直接入路进行的(81%)。未发现重大并发症。40例(93%)患者获得了组织学诊断,敏感性为93%,特异性为100%,总体准确率为93%。进行分子诊断检测的概率随着活检年份的增加而增加(OR 3.34,95% CI 1.33-8.40,P=0.01):CNB是一种高效、安全的获取高质量材料的方法。结论:CNB 是一种高效、安全的获取高质量材料的方法,随着分子图谱分析不断改进 PDAC 的诊断、预后和治疗,这种方法将变得至关重要。
{"title":"The Role of CT-guided Core Needle Biopsy in Pancreatic Tumors: An Initial Evaluation in Modern Oncology.","authors":"Eduardo P Eyheremendy, Cristian A Angeramo, Patricio Méndez","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001319","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001319","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently become the standard of care for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and there have even been numerous reports evaluating its potential benefits in resectable PDAC. However, neoadjuvant therapy first requires a histological or cytological diagnosis. This study aimed to analyze the safety and diagnostic yield of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of patients with pancreatic tumor requiring a CNB during the period 2015 to 2023 were included. Biopsies were performed with an 18-20 G Tru-Core needle using a coaxial system and automatic biopsy gun. Demographics, procedural variables, postoperative outcomes, and histological results were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 pancreatic biopsies were performed in 42 patients. The mean age was 60 years (35 to 81 y), and 24 (56%) were males. Tumors were more frequently localized in the head (42%) and body (42%) of the pancreas. The mean size of the pancreatic lesions was 53.77 mm (17 to 181 mm) and the mean number of samples per biopsy was 4 (1 to 12). Most procedures were performed via direct access (81%). No major complications were observed. Histological diagnosis was obtained in 40 (93%) patients, with a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 100% and an overall accuracy rate of 93%. The probability of performing a molecular diagnostic test increased with the year of biopsy (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.33-8.40, P =0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CNB is an efficient and safe method for obtaining high-quality material. This approach could be essential as molecular profiling continues to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of PDAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"578-582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141988969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Reduction of Severe Anastomotic Leakage by Evaluation of Blood Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Followed by Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction. 应用吲哚菁绿评价微创食管切除术后狭窄胃管重建术后血流灌注降低严重吻合口漏风险。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001331
Junya Kitadani, Keiji Hayata, Taro Goda, Shinta Tominaga, Naoki Fukuda, Tomoki Nakai, Shotaro Nagano, Toshiyasu Ojima, Manabu Kawai

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. This retrospective study aims to reveal the factors in prevention of AL and in reduction of its severity.

Methods: Enrolled in this study were the 183 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by narrow gastric tube reconstruction at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and March 2023. Evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green began in September 2020.

Results: AL occurred in 42 patients (22%) and did not occur in 141 patients (78%). Patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with and without AL. Evaluation of blood perfusion of the gastric tube was performed in 69 of the 183 patients (37.7%), and after its introduction the rates of AL decreased from 28.0% to 14.4%. Blood perfusion was less evaluated in the AL group than in the non-AL group (23.8% vs. 41.8%, P=0.034). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green (odds=3.115) was an independent risk factor for AL. For the patients with AL, active interventions (eg, tube insertion into the gastric tube through the nose or fistula, embolization of cyanoacrylate) were performed significantly more often in the group without evaluation of blood perfusion than in the group with evaluation. Without evaluation of blood perfusion, there was significantly longer time from onset to resumption of diet and significantly longer postoperative hospital stays.

Conclusions: Evaluation of qualitative blood perfusion can lead to both risk reduction and prevention of severe AL after narrow gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer.

背景:吻合口漏是食管切除术和胃管重建术后的主要并发症。本回顾性研究旨在揭示AL的预防和减轻其严重程度的因素。方法:本研究纳入2018年1月至2023年3月在和歌山医科大学医院行微创食管切除术后窄胃管重建的183例食管癌患者。2020年9月开始使用吲哚菁绿评估血液灌注。结果:AL发生42例(22%),未发生141例(78%)。在183例患者中,有69例(37.7%)进行了胃管血流灌注评估,引入胃管后,胃管的发生率从28.0%下降到14.4%。AL组的血流灌注评估低于非AL组(23.8%比41.8%,P=0.034)。多因素分析显示,未使用吲哚菁绿评价血流灌注(odds=3.115)是AL的独立危险因素。对于AL患者,未进行血流灌注评价组的积极干预(如通过鼻或瘘管插入胃管、氰基酸酯栓塞)明显多于有评价组。在不评估血液灌注的情况下,从发病到恢复饮食的时间明显更长,术后住院时间明显更长。结论:定量评价血液灌注可降低食管癌狭窄胃管重建术后发生严重AL的风险和预防AL的发生。
{"title":"Risk Reduction of Severe Anastomotic Leakage by Evaluation of Blood Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Followed by Narrow Gastric Tube Reconstruction.","authors":"Junya Kitadani, Keiji Hayata, Taro Goda, Shinta Tominaga, Naoki Fukuda, Tomoki Nakai, Shotaro Nagano, Toshiyasu Ojima, Manabu Kawai","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction. This retrospective study aims to reveal the factors in prevention of AL and in reduction of its severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled in this study were the 183 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by narrow gastric tube reconstruction at Wakayama Medical University Hospital between January 2018 and March 2023. Evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green began in September 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AL occurred in 42 patients (22%) and did not occur in 141 patients (78%). Patient characteristics were not significantly different between patients with and without AL. Evaluation of blood perfusion of the gastric tube was performed in 69 of the 183 patients (37.7%), and after its introduction the rates of AL decreased from 28.0% to 14.4%. Blood perfusion was less evaluated in the AL group than in the non-AL group (23.8% vs. 41.8%, P=0.034). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-evaluation of blood perfusion using indocyanine green (odds=3.115) was an independent risk factor for AL. For the patients with AL, active interventions (eg, tube insertion into the gastric tube through the nose or fistula, embolization of cyanoacrylate) were performed significantly more often in the group without evaluation of blood perfusion than in the group with evaluation. Without evaluation of blood perfusion, there was significantly longer time from onset to resumption of diet and significantly longer postoperative hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation of qualitative blood perfusion can lead to both risk reduction and prevention of severe AL after narrow gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":"34 6","pages":"619-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142780715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia. 脊髓硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉下腹腔镜腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001314
Turgut Donmez, Evrim Kucur Tulubas, Ipek Bostanci

Background: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently used elective surgical operations in the world. General anesthesia (GA) has risks and routine postoperative complications, such as nausea, vomiting, throat irritation, and postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia (RA) has many advantages over GA, such as faster recovery, less postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting, and less hemodynamic compromise. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in preventing shoulder pain in patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TEP).

Materials and methods: The files of patients who had undergone the TEP method under GA and CSEA due to inguinal hernia between April 2020 and November 2021 at the Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: A total of 81 patients were included in the study. The number of patients operated on GA (group 1) was 40, and the number of patients operated under CSEA (group 2) was 41. There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics of the patients. The surgical time was 42.9 and 42.5 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.970). The mean operative time was recorded as 60.1 and 80.2 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and it was statistically significantly shorter in group 1 (P<0.001). A peritoneal tear was seen in 18 patients (43.90%) in the GA group and 16 patients (40%) in the CSEA group, but no significant difference was found between the groups (P=0.823). Mild shoulder pain that did not require intervention was observed in 1 patient (2.5%) in the CSEA group. In group 2, the VAS scores at all times and the need for postoperative analgesia were statistically significantly lower (P<0.001). In terms of anesthesia complications, headache was not observed in group 1, while it was seen in 6 (15%) patients in group 2 (P=0.012).

Conclusions: In laparoscopic TEP surgeries, CSEA may be an alternative anesthesia method to GA anesthesia due to the low VAS score, less need for analgesia, and fewer postoperative pulmonary complications.

背景:腹股沟疝修补术是世界上最常用的选择性外科手术之一。全身麻醉(GA)存在风险和术后常见并发症,如恶心、呕吐、喉咙刺激和术后疼痛。区域麻醉(RA)比GA有许多优点,如恢复更快,术后疼痛,恶心和呕吐更少,血流动力学损害更小。我们的目的是探讨脊髓和硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)预防完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)患者肩部疼痛的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:回顾性分析Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk培训与研究医院2020年4月至2021年11月因腹股沟疝在GA和CSEA下行TEP方法的患者档案。结果:共纳入81例患者。GA组40例,CSEA组41例。两组患者的人口学特征无显著差异。手术时间1组为42.9 min, 2组为42.5 min (P=0.970)。1组和2组的平均手术时间分别为60.1和80.2分钟,1组的平均手术时间较1组短,差异有统计学意义(p)结论:在腹腔镜TEP手术中,CSEA因VAS评分低、无需镇痛、术后肺部并发症少,可能是GA麻醉的替代麻醉方式。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia.","authors":"Turgut Donmez, Evrim Kucur Tulubas, Ipek Bostanci","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently used elective surgical operations in the world. General anesthesia (GA) has risks and routine postoperative complications, such as nausea, vomiting, throat irritation, and postoperative pain. Regional anesthesia (RA) has many advantages over GA, such as faster recovery, less postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting, and less hemodynamic compromise. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in preventing shoulder pain in patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TEP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The files of patients who had undergone the TEP method under GA and CSEA due to inguinal hernia between April 2020 and November 2021 at the Bakirköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital were reviewed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients were included in the study. The number of patients operated on GA (group 1) was 40, and the number of patients operated under CSEA (group 2) was 41. There was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics of the patients. The surgical time was 42.9 and 42.5 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.970). The mean operative time was recorded as 60.1 and 80.2 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and it was statistically significantly shorter in group 1 (P<0.001). A peritoneal tear was seen in 18 patients (43.90%) in the GA group and 16 patients (40%) in the CSEA group, but no significant difference was found between the groups (P=0.823). Mild shoulder pain that did not require intervention was observed in 1 patient (2.5%) in the CSEA group. In group 2, the VAS scores at all times and the need for postoperative analgesia were statistically significantly lower (P<0.001). In terms of anesthesia complications, headache was not observed in group 1, while it was seen in 6 (15%) patients in group 2 (P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In laparoscopic TEP surgeries, CSEA may be an alternative anesthesia method to GA anesthesia due to the low VAS score, less need for analgesia, and fewer postoperative pulmonary complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":"34 6","pages":"566-570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142780769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Infrared Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-guided Laparoscopic Hepatectomy on Securing the Resection Margin for Colorectal Liver Metastasis. 红外吲哚菁绿荧光成像引导的腹腔镜肝切除术对确保结直肠肝转移灶切除边缘的影响
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001320
Toru Kato, Masafumi Imamura, Daisuke Kyuno, Yasutoshi Kimura, Kazuharu Kukita, Takeshi Murakami, Eiji Yoshida, Toru Mizuguchi, Ichiro Takemasa

Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is performed worldwide. However, owing to a lack of palpatory information and difficulties associated with accurate intraoperative ultrasonographic diagnosis, the tumor may be exposed at the hepatic transection margin. This study aimed to investigate the pathological significance of near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG)-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy and determine its usefulness in securing the resection margin for CRLMs.

Methods: Fifty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for CRLM using NIR fluorescence imaging between February 2017 and June 2021 at Sapporo Medical University Hospital were included. Generally, all patients received intravenous ICG (2.5 mg/body) as a fluorescence agent 1 to 2 days before surgery. During the surgical procedure, real-time NIR fluorescence imaging was repeatedly performed to assess the surgical margins.

Results: Of the 94 tumors in 59 patients, laparoscopic NIR fluorescence imaging identified 56 tumors (59.6%) on the liver surface. Pathological analysis indicated clear margins in 96.6% (57/59) of patients. Examination of paraffin-embedded sections, which were successful in only 20 of 94 cases (21.3%), revealed that there were no tumor cells positive for NIR fluorescence, and the median distance of the continuous fluorescent signal from the tumor margin was 1.074 mm.

Conclusions: We demonstrated a high R0 rate using NIR fluorescence-guided hepatectomy. This technique has the potential to improve intraoperative tumor identification and tumor margin assurance and reduce the rate of positive resection margins in patients with CRLMs.

背景:腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠肝转移瘤(CRLM)在全球范围内广泛开展。然而,由于缺乏触诊信息以及术中超声波准确诊断的困难,肿瘤可能暴露在肝横切缘处。本研究旨在探讨吲哚菁绿(ICG)引导下腹腔镜肝切除术的近红外(NIR)荧光成像的病理学意义,并确定其在确保CRLMs切除边缘方面的作用:纳入2017年2月至2021年6月期间在札幌医科大学附属医院使用近红外荧光成像对CRLM进行腹腔镜肝切除术的59例患者。一般情况下,所有患者在术前1至2天静脉注射ICG(2.5毫克/体)作为荧光剂。在手术过程中,反复进行实时近红外荧光成像以评估手术边缘:结果:在59名患者的94个肿瘤中,腹腔镜近红外荧光成像在肝脏表面发现了56个肿瘤(59.6%)。病理分析显示,96.6%(57/59)的患者边缘清晰。对石蜡包埋切片的检查显示,94 例患者中仅有 20 例(21.3%)成功进行了近红外荧光成像,没有肿瘤细胞呈阳性,连续荧光信号距离肿瘤边缘的中位距离为 1.074 毫米:结论:我们证明了近红外荧光引导肝切除术的高R0率。这项技术有望提高术中肿瘤识别率和肿瘤边缘保证率,降低 CRLM 患者切除边缘阳性率。
{"title":"Impact of Infrared Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-guided Laparoscopic Hepatectomy on Securing the Resection Margin for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.","authors":"Toru Kato, Masafumi Imamura, Daisuke Kyuno, Yasutoshi Kimura, Kazuharu Kukita, Takeshi Murakami, Eiji Yoshida, Toru Mizuguchi, Ichiro Takemasa","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is performed worldwide. However, owing to a lack of palpatory information and difficulties associated with accurate intraoperative ultrasonographic diagnosis, the tumor may be exposed at the hepatic transection margin. This study aimed to investigate the pathological significance of near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG)-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy and determine its usefulness in securing the resection margin for CRLMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for CRLM using NIR fluorescence imaging between February 2017 and June 2021 at Sapporo Medical University Hospital were included. Generally, all patients received intravenous ICG (2.5 mg/body) as a fluorescence agent 1 to 2 days before surgery. During the surgical procedure, real-time NIR fluorescence imaging was repeatedly performed to assess the surgical margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 94 tumors in 59 patients, laparoscopic NIR fluorescence imaging identified 56 tumors (59.6%) on the liver surface. Pathological analysis indicated clear margins in 96.6% (57/59) of patients. Examination of paraffin-embedded sections, which were successful in only 20 of 94 cases (21.3%), revealed that there were no tumor cells positive for NIR fluorescence, and the median distance of the continuous fluorescent signal from the tumor margin was 1.074 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated a high R0 rate using NIR fluorescence-guided hepatectomy. This technique has the potential to improve intraoperative tumor identification and tumor margin assurance and reduce the rate of positive resection margins in patients with CRLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"551-558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142056586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgical Insight-guided Deep Learning for Colorectal Lesion Management. 外科洞察力引导的深度学习在结直肠病变管理中的应用。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001298
Ozan Can Tatar, Anil Çubukçu

Background: Colonoscopy stands as a pivotal diagnostic tool in identifying gastrointestinal diseases, including potentially malignant tumors. The procedure, however, faces challenges in the precise identification of lesions during visual inspections. The recent strides in AI and machine learning technologies have opened avenues for enhanced medical imaging analysis, including in the field of colonoscopy.

Methods: In this study, we developed and evaluated a deep learning (DL) model, ColoNet, for detecting lesions in colonoscopic images. We analyzed 1760 images from 306 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2009 and 2022, meeting specific inclusion criteria. These images were used to train and validate ColoNet, employing the YOLOv8 architecture and various data augmentation techniques. Deep learning metrics are assessed via YOLO architecture and trained model diagnostic accuracy was assessed via sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results: Our results from the validation dataset revealed a precision of 0.79604, a recall of 0.78086, an mAP50 of 0.83243, and an mAP50-95 of 0.4439. In addition, on a separate real-time dataset of 91 images consisting both healthy and suspect lesions, ColoNet achieved a sensitivity of 70.73%, specificity of 92.00%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.88%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.31%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.84 and 0.32, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 82.42%.

Conclusions: In conclusion, our model has demonstrated promising results, indicating its potential as a valuable tool to assist surgeons during colonoscopy procedures. Its ability to detect suspicious lesions with potential malignancy offers a noteworthy advancement in the early diagnosis and management of colorectal cancers. Further multicentric, prospective research and validation are warranted to fully realize its clinical applicability and impact.

背景:结肠镜检查是识别胃肠道疾病,包括潜在恶性肿瘤的关键诊断工具。然而,在视觉检查过程中,该程序在精确识别病变方面面临挑战。人工智能和机器学习技术的最新进展为增强医学成像分析开辟了道路,包括在结肠镜检查领域。方法:在本研究中,我们开发并评估了一种深度学习(DL)模型ColoNet,用于检测结肠镜图像中的病变。我们分析了2009年至2022年间306例接受结直肠手术的患者的1760张图像,符合特定的纳入标准。这些图像用于训练和验证ColoNet,采用YOLOv8架构和各种数据增强技术。通过YOLO架构评估深度学习指标,并通过敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值评估训练模型的诊断准确性。结果:我们的验证数据集的结果显示精度为0.79604,召回率为0.78086,mAP50为0.83243,mAP50-95为0.4439。此外,在包含健康和可疑病变的91张图像的单独实时数据集上,ColoNet的灵敏度为70.73%,特异性为92.00%,阳性预测值(PPV)为87.88%,阴性预测值(NPV)为79.31%。正、负似然比分别为8.84和0.32,总体准确率为82.42%。结论:总之,我们的模型显示了有希望的结果,表明它有潜力作为辅助外科医生进行结肠镜检查的有价值的工具。它能够发现潜在恶性肿瘤的可疑病变,为结直肠癌的早期诊断和治疗提供了显著的进步。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究和验证,以充分发挥其临床适用性和影响。
{"title":"Surgical Insight-guided Deep Learning for Colorectal Lesion Management.","authors":"Ozan Can Tatar, Anil Çubukçu","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colonoscopy stands as a pivotal diagnostic tool in identifying gastrointestinal diseases, including potentially malignant tumors. The procedure, however, faces challenges in the precise identification of lesions during visual inspections. The recent strides in AI and machine learning technologies have opened avenues for enhanced medical imaging analysis, including in the field of colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we developed and evaluated a deep learning (DL) model, ColoNet, for detecting lesions in colonoscopic images. We analyzed 1760 images from 306 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between 2009 and 2022, meeting specific inclusion criteria. These images were used to train and validate ColoNet, employing the YOLOv8 architecture and various data augmentation techniques. Deep learning metrics are assessed via YOLO architecture and trained model diagnostic accuracy was assessed via sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results from the validation dataset revealed a precision of 0.79604, a recall of 0.78086, an mAP50 of 0.83243, and an mAP50-95 of 0.4439. In addition, on a separate real-time dataset of 91 images consisting both healthy and suspect lesions, ColoNet achieved a sensitivity of 70.73%, specificity of 92.00%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 87.88%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.31%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 8.84 and 0.32, respectively, with an overall accuracy of 82.42%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, our model has demonstrated promising results, indicating its potential as a valuable tool to assist surgeons during colonoscopy procedures. Its ability to detect suspicious lesions with potential malignancy offers a noteworthy advancement in the early diagnosis and management of colorectal cancers. Further multicentric, prospective research and validation are warranted to fully realize its clinical applicability and impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":"34 6","pages":"559-565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142780750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy. 腹腔镜与开腹第 7 节肝脏切除术安全性和可行性对比分析
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001330
Haitao Zeng, Xiaoli Xiong, Song Huang, Jia Zhang, Hongliang Liu, Yong Huang

Background: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been widely accepted owing to its advantages as a minimally invasive surgery; however, laparoscopic segment 7 (S7) hepatectomy (LSH) has been rarely reported. We aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of LSH by comparing it with open surgical approaches.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients who underwent S7 hepatectomy between January 2016 and January 2023 were enrolled in this study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: No significant differences were observed in the preoperative data. The patients who underwent LSH had significantly shorter hospital stays ( P =0.016) but longer operative times ( P =0.034) than those who underwent open S7 hepatectomy. No significant differences in blood loss ( P =0.614), transfusion ( P =0.316), hospital expenses ( P =0.391), surgical margin ( P =0.442), rate of other complications, postoperative white blood cell count, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were noted between the 2 groups ( P >0.05). For hepatocellular carcinoma, the results showed no differences in either disease-free survival ( P =0.432) or overall survival ( P =0.923) between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: LSH is a safe and feasible surgical procedure that is efficient from an oncological point of view. It may be the preferred technique for lesions in the S7 of the liver.

背景:腹腔镜肝切除术因其微创手术的优势已被广泛接受,但腹腔镜第 7 节段(S7)肝切除术(LSH)却鲜有报道。我们的目的是通过比较腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹手术方法,探索腹腔镜肝切除术的安全性和可行性:本研究共纳入了 29 例在 2016 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间接受 S7 段肝切除术的患者。比较两组患者的特征、术中细节和术后结果:结果:术前数据无明显差异。与开放式 S7 肝切除术相比,LSH 患者的住院时间明显缩短(P=0.016),但手术时间却更长(P=0.034)。两组患者在失血量(P=0.614)、输血量(P=0.316)、住院费用(P=0.391)、手术切缘(P=0.442)、其他并发症发生率、术后白细胞计数、丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平等方面均无明显差异(P>0.05)。对于肝细胞癌,结果显示两组患者的无病生存率(P=0.432)和总生存率(P=0.923)均无差异:结论:LSH 是一种安全可行的手术方法,从肿瘤学的角度来看非常有效。结论:LSH 是一种安全可行的手术方法,从肿瘤学的角度来看非常有效,可能是治疗肝脏 S7 病变的首选技术。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy.","authors":"Haitao Zeng, Xiaoli Xiong, Song Huang, Jia Zhang, Hongliang Liu, Yong Huang","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001330","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been widely accepted owing to its advantages as a minimally invasive surgery; however, laparoscopic segment 7 (S7) hepatectomy (LSH) has been rarely reported. We aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of LSH by comparing it with open surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients who underwent S7 hepatectomy between January 2016 and January 2023 were enrolled in this study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in the preoperative data. The patients who underwent LSH had significantly shorter hospital stays ( P =0.016) but longer operative times ( P =0.034) than those who underwent open S7 hepatectomy. No significant differences in blood loss ( P =0.614), transfusion ( P =0.316), hospital expenses ( P =0.391), surgical margin ( P =0.442), rate of other complications, postoperative white blood cell count, and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were noted between the 2 groups ( P >0.05). For hepatocellular carcinoma, the results showed no differences in either disease-free survival ( P =0.432) or overall survival ( P =0.923) between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSH is a safe and feasible surgical procedure that is efficient from an oncological point of view. It may be the preferred technique for lesions in the S7 of the liver.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"614-618"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142475233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Battle of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies for Obesity: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Endoscopically Inserted Intragastric Balloon-A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies and a Call for Randomized Controlled Trials. 内镜减肥疗法与肥胖症之争:内镜袖带胃成形术与内镜插入胃内球囊--一项对比研究的成对分析及对随机对照试验的呼吁》(Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Endoscopically Inserted Intragastric Balloon- A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies and a Call for Randomized Controlled Trials)。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001321
Abdul-Rahman F Diab, Joseph A Sujka, Kathleen Mattingly, Mehak Sachdeva, Kenneth Hackbarth, Salvatore Docimo, Christopher G DuCoin

Background: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) represents the latest primary endoscopic intervention for managing obesity. Both ESG and intragastric balloons (IGBs) have demonstrated effectiveness and safety for weight loss. However, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of one over the other, and no pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies has been published to date. Our aim was to conduct a pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies directly comparing ESG and IGB.

Methods: We systematically conducted a literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search used specific search terms. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1 software with a random-effects model. The statistical method used was the Mantel-Haenszel method. For dichotomous data, the effect size was represented using odds ratio (OR), while mean difference (MD) was utilized as the effect size for continuous data.

Results: After screening 967 records, a total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis (5302 patients). The quality assessment categorized 5 studies as having a moderate risk of bias, while 3 studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Sufficient information was not available for one study to ascertain its overall quality. A statistically significant increase in total weight loss percentage (TWL%) at 1 and 6 months was observed with ESG compared with IGB. In addition, a statistically insignificant decrease in the incidence of adverse events and readmissions was observed with ESG. Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of reintervention was observed with ESG.

Conclusions: While this study suggests a higher TWL% associated with ESG compared with IGB, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to limitations identified during a comprehensive quality assessment of the available literature. We advocate for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the newer IGB (with a 12-mo placement duration) with ESG. However, this study consistently reveals higher rates of early reintervention (re-endoscopy) within the IGB group, primarily necessitated by the removal or adjustment of the IGB due to intolerance. Given the additional intervention required at 6 or 12 months to remove the temporarily placed IGB, this trend may imply that IGB is less economically viable than ESG. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing ESG and IGB are warranted to provide valuable scientific insights.

背景:内镜袖带胃成形术(ESG)是控制肥胖症的最新初级内镜干预方法。ESG和胃内气球(IGBs)都已证明对减肥有效且安全。然而,支持两者优越性的高质量证据却很少,而且迄今为止还没有发表过对比研究的成对荟萃分析。我们的目的是对直接比较 ESG 和 IGB 的对比研究进行成对荟萃分析:我们按照系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统的文献检索。我们的检索使用了特定的检索词。非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。数据采用随机效应模型,使用Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1软件进行分析。使用的统计方法是曼特尔-海恩泽尔法。对于二分法数据,用几率比(OR)表示效应大小;对于连续法数据,用平均差(MD)表示效应大小:结果:在筛选了 967 条记录后,共有 9 项研究符合本次荟萃分析的纳入标准(5302 名患者)。质量评估结果显示,5 项研究存在中度偏倚风险,3 项研究存在低度偏倚风险。有一项研究的信息不足,无法确定其总体质量。与 IGB 相比,ESG 在 1 个月和 6 个月时的总减重百分比 (TWL%) 有明显的统计学增长。此外,ESG 的不良事件发生率和再入院率的下降在统计学上并不明显。此外,ESG 的再介入发生率在统计学上也有显著下降:虽然这项研究表明 ESG 的 TWL% 比 IGB 高,但由于对现有文献进行全面质量评估时发现的局限性,得出明确结论具有挑战性。我们主张进行随机对照试验(RCT),直接比较较新的 IGB(置管时间为 12 个月)和 ESG。然而,本研究一致显示,IGB 组的早期再介入(再内镜检查)率较高,主要是由于不耐受而必须移除或调整 IGB。鉴于需要在 6 个月或 12 个月时进行额外干预以移除临时放置的 IGB,这一趋势可能意味着 IGB 在经济上不如 ESG 可行。有必要对 ESG 和 IGB 进行成本效益分析比较,以提供有价值的科学见解。
{"title":"The Battle of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies for Obesity: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Endoscopically Inserted Intragastric Balloon-A Pairwise Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies and a Call for Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Abdul-Rahman F Diab, Joseph A Sujka, Kathleen Mattingly, Mehak Sachdeva, Kenneth Hackbarth, Salvatore Docimo, Christopher G DuCoin","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001321","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) represents the latest primary endoscopic intervention for managing obesity. Both ESG and intragastric balloons (IGBs) have demonstrated effectiveness and safety for weight loss. However, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting the superiority of one over the other, and no pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies has been published to date. Our aim was to conduct a pairwise meta-analysis of comparative studies directly comparing ESG and IGB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically conducted a literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our search used specific search terms. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) Tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4.1 software with a random-effects model. The statistical method used was the Mantel-Haenszel method. For dichotomous data, the effect size was represented using odds ratio (OR), while mean difference (MD) was utilized as the effect size for continuous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 967 records, a total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis (5302 patients). The quality assessment categorized 5 studies as having a moderate risk of bias, while 3 studies were classified as having a low risk of bias. Sufficient information was not available for one study to ascertain its overall quality. A statistically significant increase in total weight loss percentage (TWL%) at 1 and 6 months was observed with ESG compared with IGB. In addition, a statistically insignificant decrease in the incidence of adverse events and readmissions was observed with ESG. Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of reintervention was observed with ESG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While this study suggests a higher TWL% associated with ESG compared with IGB, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to limitations identified during a comprehensive quality assessment of the available literature. We advocate for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the newer IGB (with a 12-mo placement duration) with ESG. However, this study consistently reveals higher rates of early reintervention (re-endoscopy) within the IGB group, primarily necessitated by the removal or adjustment of the IGB due to intolerance. Given the additional intervention required at 6 or 12 months to remove the temporarily placed IGB, this trend may imply that IGB is less economically viable than ESG. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing ESG and IGB are warranted to provide valuable scientific insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"638-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142295900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Level, an Independent Predictor for Postoperative Intra-abdominal Abscess After Laparoscopic Appendectomy. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔内脓肿的独立预测因素--低预后营养指数水平
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001328
Yijian Yuan, Yanhua Tang, Yubin Liu, Pengcheng Ren

Background: Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) is a very common postoperative complication after laparoscopic appendectomy and is associated with poor prognosis.

Materials and methods: This study retrospectively analyzed elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 2015 to 2024, examining demographic, clinical, and laboratory data to identify IAA risk factors. Independent risk factors for IAA were screened and finally identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 37 patients developed IAA within postoperative 30 days, with an incidence of 9.6% (37/385). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated white blood cell (cut-off value: 13.35, sensitivity: 54.60%, specificity: 70.27%, P =0.003) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) (cut-off value: 41.95, sensitivity: 72.41%, specificity: 59.46%, P <0.0001) were 2 predictors for IAA with an area under the curve of 0.649 and 0.727, respectively. Based on the multivariate analysis, perforated appendicitis (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.15-5.32, P =0.021) and a lower PNI score (odds ratio: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.49-7.58, P =0.002) were 2 independent risk factors for IAA in elderly patients after laparoscopic appendectomy.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with perforated appendicitis and a PNI score <41.95 have higher risks for IAA after laparoscopic appendectomy.

背景:腹腔内脓肿(IAA)是腹腔镜阑尾切除术后一种非常常见的术后并发症,与不良预后有关:本研究回顾性分析了2015年至2024年接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的老年患者,研究了人口统计学、临床和实验室数据,以确定IAA的风险因素。通过多变量逻辑回归分析,筛选并最终确定了IAA的独立风险因素:共有37名患者在术后30天内出现IAA,发生率为9.6%(37/385)。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析表明,白细胞(截断值:13.35,敏感性:54.60%,特异性:70.27%,P=0.003)和预后营养指数(PNI)(截断值:41.95,敏感性:72.00%,P=0.003)与术后 30 天内发生 IAA 的患者数量相关:41.95,敏感性:72.41%,特异性:59.46%,P=0.003:穿孔性阑尾炎老年患者的 PNI 评分
{"title":"A Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Level, an Independent Predictor for Postoperative Intra-abdominal Abscess After Laparoscopic Appendectomy.","authors":"Yijian Yuan, Yanhua Tang, Yubin Liu, Pengcheng Ren","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001328","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001328","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) is a very common postoperative complication after laparoscopic appendectomy and is associated with poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed elderly patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 2015 to 2024, examining demographic, clinical, and laboratory data to identify IAA risk factors. Independent risk factors for IAA were screened and finally identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 patients developed IAA within postoperative 30 days, with an incidence of 9.6% (37/385). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated white blood cell (cut-off value: 13.35, sensitivity: 54.60%, specificity: 70.27%, P =0.003) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) (cut-off value: 41.95, sensitivity: 72.41%, specificity: 59.46%, P <0.0001) were 2 predictors for IAA with an area under the curve of 0.649 and 0.727, respectively. Based on the multivariate analysis, perforated appendicitis (odds ratio: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.15-5.32, P =0.021) and a lower PNI score (odds ratio: 3.44, 95% CI: 1.49-7.58, P =0.002) were 2 independent risk factors for IAA in elderly patients after laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elderly patients with perforated appendicitis and a PNI score <41.95 have higher risks for IAA after laparoscopic appendectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"603-606"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142366599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined With Choledochoscopic Lithotomy for Complex Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones and Its Impact on Postoperative Liver Function. 腹腔镜左半肝切除术联合胆道镜碎石术治疗复杂肝内胆管结石的疗效及其对术后肝功能的影响
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001334
Zengyin Chen, Juan Du

Background: This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy for patients with complex intrahepatic bile duct stones.

Materials and methods: The clinical data of 97 patients with complex intrahepatic bile duct stones treated in our hospital between February 2019 and April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were allocated into 2 groups based on their surgical approaches. In the control group, 46 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy, while in the combined group, 51 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy. Parameters such as clinical efficacy, surgical indices, stress response markers (CRP, EP, COR), coagulation metrics (FIB, APTT, PT), liver function indicators (GGT, TBIL, ALT), complications, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The combined group exhibited a significantly higher total effective rate compared with the control group (98.04% vs. 82.61%) ( P <0.05). The operation duration of the combined group was longer than that of the control group. However, the duration for postoperative anal exhaustion, postoperative bed mobility, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay was shorter in the combined group than in the control group ( P <0.05). CRP, EP, and COR concentrations were substantially elevated in both groups on the third postoperative day ( P <0.05), but were lower in the combined group. Similarly, levels of FIB, APTT, and PT were markedly increased in both groups on the third postoperative day ( P <0.05), but were lower in the combined group. On the seventh postoperative day, GGT, TBIL, and ALT were notably decreased in both groups, with the combined group exhibiting lower levels ( P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the combined group was lower than that of the control group (5.88% vs. 19.57%) ( P <0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, all GIQLI scores were markedly elevated in both groups, with superior scores observed in the combined group ( P <0.05).

Conclusion: The combined laparoscopy and choledochoscopy demonstrate a remarkable efficacy for complex intrahepatic bile duct stones, which significantly facilitate liver function recuperation, reduce stress reactions, reduce complications, enhance the quality of life, and exert a minimal impact on coagulation functions.

背景:本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜下左半肝切除术联合胆道镜取石术治疗复杂性肝内胆管结石患者的临床疗效:回顾性收集我院2019年2月至2022年4月期间收治的97例复杂性肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料。根据手术方式将患者分为两组。在对照组中,46 名患者接受了腹腔镜左半肝切除术,而在联合组中,51 名患者接受了腹腔镜左半肝切除术联合胆道镜碎石术。比较了两组患者的临床疗效、手术指数、应激反应指标(CRP、EP、COR)、凝血指标(FIB、APTT、PT)、肝功能指标(GGT、TBIL、ALT)、并发症和生活质量等参数:结果:与对照组相比,联合组的总有效率明显更高(98.04% 对 82.61%):腹腔镜和胆道镜联合治疗肝内复杂胆管结石疗效显著,可明显促进肝功能恢复,减轻应激反应,减少并发症,提高生活质量,对凝血功能影响极小。
{"title":"Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined With Choledochoscopic Lithotomy for Complex Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones and Its Impact on Postoperative Liver Function.","authors":"Zengyin Chen, Juan Du","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001334","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was designed to investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy for patients with complex intrahepatic bile duct stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The clinical data of 97 patients with complex intrahepatic bile duct stones treated in our hospital between February 2019 and April 2022 were retrospectively collected. Patients were allocated into 2 groups based on their surgical approaches. In the control group, 46 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy, while in the combined group, 51 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with choledochoscopic lithotomy. Parameters such as clinical efficacy, surgical indices, stress response markers (CRP, EP, COR), coagulation metrics (FIB, APTT, PT), liver function indicators (GGT, TBIL, ALT), complications, and quality of life were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined group exhibited a significantly higher total effective rate compared with the control group (98.04% vs. 82.61%) ( P <0.05). The operation duration of the combined group was longer than that of the control group. However, the duration for postoperative anal exhaustion, postoperative bed mobility, postoperative drainage, and hospital stay was shorter in the combined group than in the control group ( P <0.05). CRP, EP, and COR concentrations were substantially elevated in both groups on the third postoperative day ( P <0.05), but were lower in the combined group. Similarly, levels of FIB, APTT, and PT were markedly increased in both groups on the third postoperative day ( P <0.05), but were lower in the combined group. On the seventh postoperative day, GGT, TBIL, and ALT were notably decreased in both groups, with the combined group exhibiting lower levels ( P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the combined group was lower than that of the control group (5.88% vs. 19.57%) ( P <0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, all GIQLI scores were markedly elevated in both groups, with superior scores observed in the combined group ( P <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined laparoscopy and choledochoscopy demonstrate a remarkable efficacy for complex intrahepatic bile duct stones, which significantly facilitate liver function recuperation, reduce stress reactions, reduce complications, enhance the quality of life, and exert a minimal impact on coagulation functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"630-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142508379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1