首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Innovation最新文献

英文 中文
Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Development of a Predictive Nomogram. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术转换的危险因素及预测Nomogram发展。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251413062
Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Ramazan Topcu, Veysel Barış Turhan, İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner

BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for gallbladder disease, yet conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) remains necessary in 2-15% of cases. Although often life-saving, conversion increases operative time, morbidity, and hospital stay. Identifying reliable predictors is therefore crucial for surgical planning and patient counseling.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 4535 patients who underwent LC at a tertiary center between January 2018 and May 2024. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, intraoperative, and histopathological data were extracted from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of conversion. A nomogram was developed to estimate individualized conversion risk.ResultsConversion to OC occurred in 304 patients (6.7%). Independent predictors included male sex (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50), ASA IV classification (OR 4.84, 95% CI 2.51-9.33), elevated CRP (OR 1.007 per mg/L, 95% CI 1.004-1.010), reduced lymphocyte count (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84), gastric or intestinal complications (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.01-11.38), gangrenous gallbladder (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.45-3.93), and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (OR 5.42, 95% CI 1.61-18.25). Gallbladder wall thickness was the strongest preoperative predictor (OR 1.20 per mm, 95% CI 1.13-1.27, P < 0.001), and existence of dense adhesions were the strongest intraoperative predictor (OR 26.77, 95% CI 16.64-43.07).ConclusionConversion to OC reflects anatomical complexity and advanced disease rather than surgical failure. Gallbladder wall thickness, inflammatory markers, adhesions, gangrene, and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis are consistent predictors. The proposed nomogram provides individualized risk estimation to improve preoperative planning and patient counseling. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.

背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是胆囊疾病的金标准,但仍有2-15%的病例需要转换为开放式胆囊切除术(OC)。虽然转化通常可以挽救生命,但会增加手术时间、发病率和住院时间。因此,确定可靠的预测因子对于手术计划和患者咨询至关重要。方法对2018年1月至2024年5月在某三级中心接受LC治疗的4535例患者进行回顾性队列研究。从医疗记录中提取人口统计学、临床、实验室、放射学、术中和组织病理学数据。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定转换的独立预测因子。我们开发了一个nomogram来估计个体化的转化风险。结果304例(6.7%)患者发生转化为OC。独立预测因素包括男性(OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50)、ASA IV分类(OR 4.84, 95% CI 2.51-9.33)、CRP升高(OR 1.007 / mg/L, 95% CI 1.004-1.010)、淋巴细胞计数减少(OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84)、胃或肠道并发症(OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.01-11.38)、胆囊坏疽(OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.45-3.93)和黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎(OR 5.42, 95% CI 1.61-18.25)。胆囊壁厚度是术前最强的预测因子(OR 1.20 / mm, 95% CI 1.13-1.27, P < 0.001),术中存在致密粘连是最强的预测因子(OR 26.77, 95% CI 16.64-43.07)。结论转换为OC反映了解剖复杂性和疾病的进展,而不是手术失败。胆囊壁厚度、炎症标志物、粘连、坏疽和黄色肉芽肿性胆囊炎是一致的预测因素。所提出的nomogram提供了个体化的风险评估,以改善术前规划和患者咨询。前瞻性多中心验证是必要的。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Conversion in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Development of a Predictive Nomogram.","authors":"Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Ramazan Topcu, Veysel Barış Turhan, İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner","doi":"10.1177/15533506251413062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251413062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for gallbladder disease, yet conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) remains necessary in 2-15% of cases. Although often life-saving, conversion increases operative time, morbidity, and hospital stay. Identifying reliable predictors is therefore crucial for surgical planning and patient counseling.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 4535 patients who underwent LC at a tertiary center between January 2018 and May 2024. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, intraoperative, and histopathological data were extracted from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of conversion. A nomogram was developed to estimate individualized conversion risk.ResultsConversion to OC occurred in 304 patients (6.7%). Independent predictors included male sex (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09-2.50), ASA IV classification (OR 4.84, 95% CI 2.51-9.33), elevated CRP (OR 1.007 per mg/L, 95% CI 1.004-1.010), reduced lymphocyte count (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84), gastric or intestinal complications (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.01-11.38), gangrenous gallbladder (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.45-3.93), and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (OR 5.42, 95% CI 1.61-18.25). Gallbladder wall thickness was the strongest preoperative predictor (OR 1.20 per mm, 95% CI 1.13-1.27, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and existence of dense adhesions were the strongest intraoperative predictor (OR 26.77, 95% CI 16.64-43.07).ConclusionConversion to OC reflects anatomical complexity and advanced disease rather than surgical failure. Gallbladder wall thickness, inflammatory markers, adhesions, gangrene, and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis are consistent predictors. The proposed nomogram provides individualized risk estimation to improve preoperative planning and patient counseling. Prospective multicenter validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251413062"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145820671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Recurrence and Personalized Treatment Planning in Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease. 基于人工智能的小儿毛窦病复发预测及个性化治疗方案。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251411009
Tülin Öztaş, Suat Çal, Sevinç Akdeniz, Serdest Teğin

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models for predicting recurrence risk and supporting individualized treatment strategies in pediatric pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).MethodsClinical data from 242 pediatric PSD patients were retrospectively analyzed. Two machine learning (ML) models were developed: (1) a binary classifier for recurrence prediction and (2) a multiclass classifier for treatment modality selection. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation based on accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), F1 score, and confusion matrix. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify the most influential predictive features.ResultsAmong 242 patients, 59.1% underwent surgical excision (unroofing with secondary healing), 33.1% received crystallized phenol, and 7.8% were treated with silver nitrate. The overall recurrence rate was 5.7%, with no significant differences among treatment modalities. Longer healing duration, larger lesion size, higher body mass index (BMI), and an increased number of sinus tracts were associated with higher recurrence risk. SHAP analysis revealed that healing time, BMI, age, and the number of sinus tracts were the most influential predictors in both recurrence and treatment selection models.ConclusionAI-based predictive models can effectively estimate recurrence risk and assist in tailoring individualized management strategies for pediatric PSD. Further multicenter, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and support clinical integration of AI-assisted decision systems.

目的本研究旨在评估基于人工智能(AI)的模型在预测儿童毛毛窦疾病(PSD)复发风险和支持个体化治疗策略方面的可行性。方法回顾性分析242例小儿PSD患者的临床资料。开发了两个机器学习(ML)模型:(1)用于复发预测的二元分类器和(2)用于治疗方式选择的多类分类器。采用基于准确性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)、F1评分和混淆矩阵的5倍交叉验证来评估模型的性能。使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析来评估模型的可解释性,以确定最具影响力的预测特征。结果242例患者中,59.1%的患者行手术切除(去顶并继发愈合),33.1%的患者行结晶苯酚治疗,7.8%的患者行硝酸银治疗。总复发率为5.7%,不同治疗方式间无显著差异。较长的愈合时间、较大的病变面积、较高的身体质量指数(BMI)和窦道数量的增加与较高的复发风险相关。SHAP分析显示,愈合时间、BMI、年龄和窦道数量是复发和治疗选择模型中最具影响的预测因素。结论基于人工智能的预测模型可有效评估儿童PSD的复发风险,并有助于制定个性化的治疗策略。需要进一步的多中心前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并支持人工智能辅助决策系统的临床整合。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Recurrence and Personalized Treatment Planning in Pediatric Pilonidal Sinus Disease.","authors":"Tülin Öztaş, Suat Çal, Sevinç Akdeniz, Serdest Teğin","doi":"10.1177/15533506251411009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251411009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to assess the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI)-based models for predicting recurrence risk and supporting individualized treatment strategies in pediatric pilonidal sinus disease (PSD).MethodsClinical data from 242 pediatric PSD patients were retrospectively analyzed. Two machine learning (ML) models were developed: (1) a binary classifier for recurrence prediction and (2) a multiclass classifier for treatment modality selection. Model performance was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation based on accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), F1 score, and confusion matrix. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify the most influential predictive features.ResultsAmong 242 patients, 59.1% underwent surgical excision (unroofing with secondary healing), 33.1% received crystallized phenol, and 7.8% were treated with silver nitrate. The overall recurrence rate was 5.7%, with no significant differences among treatment modalities. Longer healing duration, larger lesion size, higher body mass index (BMI), and an increased number of sinus tracts were associated with higher recurrence risk. SHAP analysis revealed that healing time, BMI, age, and the number of sinus tracts were the most influential predictors in both recurrence and treatment selection models.ConclusionAI-based predictive models can effectively estimate recurrence risk and assist in tailoring individualized management strategies for pediatric PSD. Further multicenter, prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and support clinical integration of AI-assisted decision systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251411009"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biphasic Use of ICG for Delineation of Bilio-Vascular Anatomy During Lymph Node Clearance. 双相应用ICG描绘淋巴结清除过程中的胆管解剖。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251411014
Roy Patankar, Avinash Supe

This was biphasic use of ICG to delineate biliary as well as vascular systems simultaneously. This is safe as well as useful for enhancing the dissection and improves patient safety.

这是双期使用ICG同时描绘胆道和血管系统。这是安全的,也有助于加强解剖,提高患者的安全性。
{"title":"Biphasic Use of ICG for Delineation of Bilio-Vascular Anatomy During Lymph Node Clearance.","authors":"Roy Patankar, Avinash Supe","doi":"10.1177/15533506251411014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251411014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This was biphasic use of ICG to delineate biliary as well as vascular systems simultaneously. This is safe as well as useful for enhancing the dissection and improves patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251411014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy? 致编辑的信:人工智能能彻底改变阑尾切除术的手术决策吗?
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-21 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251409002
Marko Bašković
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy?","authors":"Marko Bašković","doi":"10.1177/15533506251409002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251409002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251409002"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the Effects of Absorbable Polyglycolic Acid-Coated Tube and Polypropylene Suture Repairs on Stricture Formation in Biliary Anastomosis. 可吸收聚乙二醇酸包埋管与聚丙烯缝线修复胆道吻合口狭窄的效果比较。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251407730
Osman Bulut, Sidika Findik, Abdulkadir Celik, Arslan Hasan Kocamaz, Omer Kisi, Alper Varman, Selman Alkan, Ibrahim Kilinc, Mustafa Senturk

BackgroundOur study aimed to compare the effects of repair using polypropylene suture material vs polyglycolic acid-coated (PGA) tube on the development of biliary strictures in rat common bile duct incisions.MethodsThirty female rats were randomly divided into three groups. A controlled defect was created in the common bile duct. In Group 1, the defect was repaired with 8/0 polyglycolic acid; in Group 2, with 8/0 polypropylene; and in Group 3, with 8/0 polyglycolide-co-lactide followed by wrapping with an absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh tube. In the second surgical step, at 3 months postoperatively, blood samples were again taken from all subjects, liver biopsies were obtained, and the repaired bile duct area was resected for histopathological evaluation. Liver biopsies obtained before bile duct repair and at 3 months after repair were compared among the groups. Anastomotic sites and proximal bile duct diameters were compared between groups at 3 months post-repair.ResultsPostoperative ALT and GGT levels were significantly higher in Group 1 rats, while ALP levels were statistically significantly lower in Group 2 rats. Epithelial hyperplasia was detected in 20% of rats in Group 3, with fewer proliferative fibroblasts and less collagen scar tissue compared with those in other groups. The Portal edema rate was significantly lower in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2.ConclusionsThe use of PGA -coated tubes after PGLA suturing suggests that these tubes may reduce strictures in biliary repair in rats by maintaining a wider anastomotic diameter.

本研究旨在比较聚丙烯缝合材料与聚乙醇酸包覆(PGA)管对大鼠胆总管切口胆道狭窄发展的影响。方法30只雌性大鼠随机分为3组。在胆总管处形成了一个可控的缺损。组1采用8/0聚乙醇酸修复缺损;第2组为8/0聚丙烯;第3组,用8/0聚乙醇酸-共丙交酯包裹,然后用可吸收聚乙醇酸网管包裹。手术第二步,术后3个月,再次采集所有受试者的血液样本,进行肝脏活检,切除修复的胆管区域进行组织病理学评估。比较两组患者胆管修复前及修复后3个月肝活检结果。术后3个月比较两组吻合口及近端胆管直径。结果1组大鼠术后ALT、GGT水平显著升高,2组大鼠术后ALP水平显著降低。第3组有20%的大鼠出现上皮增生,与其他各组相比,增生性成纤维细胞减少,胶原瘢痕组织减少。第3组大鼠门脉水肿率明显低于第1、2组。结论PGA包埋管在大鼠胆道修复中可维持较宽的吻合口直径,减少胆道狭窄。
{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Absorbable Polyglycolic Acid-Coated Tube and Polypropylene Suture Repairs on Stricture Formation in Biliary Anastomosis.","authors":"Osman Bulut, Sidika Findik, Abdulkadir Celik, Arslan Hasan Kocamaz, Omer Kisi, Alper Varman, Selman Alkan, Ibrahim Kilinc, Mustafa Senturk","doi":"10.1177/15533506251407730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251407730","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundOur study aimed to compare the effects of repair using polypropylene suture material vs polyglycolic acid-coated (PGA) tube on the development of biliary strictures in rat common bile duct incisions.MethodsThirty female rats were randomly divided into three groups. A controlled defect was created in the common bile duct. In Group 1, the defect was repaired with 8/0 polyglycolic acid; in Group 2, with 8/0 polypropylene; and in Group 3, with 8/0 polyglycolide-co-lactide followed by wrapping with an absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh tube. In the second surgical step, at 3 months postoperatively, blood samples were again taken from all subjects, liver biopsies were obtained, and the repaired bile duct area was resected for histopathological evaluation. Liver biopsies obtained before bile duct repair and at 3 months after repair were compared among the groups. Anastomotic sites and proximal bile duct diameters were compared between groups at 3 months post-repair.ResultsPostoperative ALT and GGT levels were significantly higher in Group 1 rats, while ALP levels were statistically significantly lower in Group 2 rats. Epithelial hyperplasia was detected in 20% of rats in Group 3, with fewer proliferative fibroblasts and less collagen scar tissue compared with those in other groups. The Portal edema rate was significantly lower in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2.ConclusionsThe use of PGA -coated tubes after PGLA suturing suggests that these tubes may reduce strictures in biliary repair in rats by maintaining a wider anastomotic diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251407730"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145715788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conventional Laparoscopic vs Multi-Degree of Freedom Articulating Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgical Suturing. 传统腹腔镜与多自由度关节器械在微创手术缝合中的比较。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251407183
Maggie Jiang, Alexis Samples, Austin Garcia, Yufan Brandon Chen

Study ObjectiveThe Artisential instruments are multi-degree-of-freedom laparoscopic instruments compatible with traditional ports. Their articulation may offer advantages over conventional instruments, particularly in suturing. This study aimed to compare suturing times between conventional laparoscopic instruments and the Artisential device.DesignInternally controlled prospective cohort/case series.InterventionsA power analysis determined that 16 knots per group were needed to detect a 20s difference with 80% power and 5% alpha. Two patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled. During anterior and posterior mesh fixation, half the knots were tied using two conventional laparoscopic needle drivers; the other half used an Artisential needle driver in one hand and a conventional driver in the other. All knots were tied by the same surgeon, positioned adjacently to minimize bias from laterality or pelvic depth. Each knot consisted of a surgeon's knot followed by two square knots. All cases were recorded and evaluated by 2 reviewers, using time stamps to determine knot tying duration. T-tests compared times between the groups.Measurements and Main ResultsThirty-two knots were analyzed. Mean knot time was 119 s (SD 43) with conventional instruments vs 66 s (SD 14) using the Artisential device (P < .01). All individual components-needling, surgeon's knot, and both square knots-were significantly faster with the Artisential driver (all P < .05).ConclusionThe Artisential articulating laparoscopic instrument nearly halved knot-tying time during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. This novel instrument may improve surgical efficiency in minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.

研究目的:人工器械是一种与传统腔口兼容的多自由度腹腔镜器械。它们的关节可能比传统的器械更有优势,特别是在缝合方面。本研究旨在比较传统腹腔镜器械和人工器械的缝合时间。设计内部控制的前瞻性队列/病例系列。干预功率分析确定,在功率为80%、alpha为5%的情况下,每组需要16节才能检测到20秒的差异。我们招募了两名接受腹腔镜骶骶固定术的患者。在前后网固定期间,一半的结使用两个传统的腹腔镜针驱动器打结;另一半人一只手用手工打针器,另一只手用传统打针器。所有结由同一位外科医生打结,相邻定位以减少侧位或骨盆深度造成的偏倚。每个结由一个外科结和两个方结组成。所有病例均由2名审查员记录和评估,使用时间戳确定打结时间。t检验比较各组之间的时间。对32个节进行了测量和主要结果分析。使用传统器械的平均结时间为119秒(SD 43),而使用Artisential器械的平均结时间为66秒(SD 14) (P < 0.01)。所有单独的组件——针刺、外科结和两个方结——使用Artisential驱动器明显更快(均P < 0.05)。结论人工关节式腹腔镜器械在腹腔镜骶骶固定术中可缩短打结时间。该仪器可提高微创妇科手术的手术效率。
{"title":"Conventional Laparoscopic vs Multi-Degree of Freedom Articulating Instruments in Minimally Invasive Surgical Suturing.","authors":"Maggie Jiang, Alexis Samples, Austin Garcia, Yufan Brandon Chen","doi":"10.1177/15533506251407183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251407183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study ObjectiveThe Artisential instruments are multi-degree-of-freedom laparoscopic instruments compatible with traditional ports. Their articulation may offer advantages over conventional instruments, particularly in suturing. This study aimed to compare suturing times between conventional laparoscopic instruments and the Artisential device.DesignInternally controlled prospective cohort/case series.InterventionsA power analysis determined that 16 knots per group were needed to detect a 20s difference with 80% power and 5% alpha. Two patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy were enrolled. During anterior and posterior mesh fixation, half the knots were tied using two conventional laparoscopic needle drivers; the other half used an Artisential needle driver in one hand and a conventional driver in the other. All knots were tied by the same surgeon, positioned adjacently to minimize bias from laterality or pelvic depth. Each knot consisted of a surgeon's knot followed by two square knots. All cases were recorded and evaluated by 2 reviewers, using time stamps to determine knot tying duration. T-tests compared times between the groups.Measurements and Main ResultsThirty-two knots were analyzed. Mean knot time was 119 s (SD 43) with conventional instruments vs 66 s (SD 14) using the Artisential device (<i>P</i> < .01). All individual components-needling, surgeon's knot, and both square knots-were significantly faster with the Artisential driver (all <i>P</i> < .05).ConclusionThe Artisential articulating laparoscopic instrument nearly halved knot-tying time during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. This novel instrument may improve surgical efficiency in minimally invasive gynecologic procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251407183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145701722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience. 优化的“全右”仪器配置在机器人直肠手术与达芬奇Xi系统:一个前瞻性的单中心经验。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251374470
Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro

BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized "full right" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.

背景:直肠癌的机器人手术在狭窄的骨盆空间中提供了增强的可视化、器械关节和人体工程学的好处。然而,机器人手术的有效性在很大程度上取决于套管针的定位和器械的布局。传统的配置通常需要术中更换器械或重新定位相机,这可能会破坏工作流程并增加认知压力。为了解决这些限制,我们使用达芬奇Xi系统实现了标准化的“全权利”仪器配置,以提高人体工程学控制和程序稳定性。方法:我们对22例连续在大容量三级中心采用全右配置进行机器人直肠切除术的患者进行前瞻性分析。所有机械臂和辅助端口沿患者右侧放置,相机在整个过程中固定在2号臂上。评估手术、围手术期和病理结果。结果平均手术时间192 min,平均手术时间170 min。无转诊及术中并发症发生。没有观察到仪器碰撞。所有病例的估计失血量都很小。平均住院时间为5.2天。所有患者都完成了完整的(3级)直肠系膜切除术,平均淋巴结率为16.4,阴性边缘。术后无重大并发症。结论机器人直肠切除术的完全正确配置具有良好的短期预后,改善了人体工程学条件,并且器械定位稳定。这种布局支持所有手术阶段的一致工作流程,并可能减少术中认知负荷。有必要通过更大规模的比较研究进一步验证。
{"title":"Optimized 'Full Right' Instrument Configuration in Robotic Rectal Surgery With the Da Vinci Xi System: A Prospective Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Celeste Del Basso, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Fabrizio Panaro","doi":"10.1177/15533506251374470","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506251374470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundRobotic surgery for rectal cancer offers enhanced visualization, instrument articulation, and ergonomic benefits in confined pelvic spaces. However, the effectiveness of robotic procedures depends heavily on trocar positioning and instrument layout. Conventional configurations often require intraoperative instrument swapping or camera repositioning, potentially disrupting workflow and increasing cognitive strain. To address these limitations, we implemented a standardized \"full right\" instrument configuration using the Da Vinci Xi system to improve ergonomic control and procedural stability.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic rectal resection at a high-volume tertiary center using the full right configuration. All robotic arms and the assistant port were positioned along the patient's right side, with the camera fixed on Arm 2 throughout the procedure. Operative, perioperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.ResultsThe mean console time was 170 min, and the mean operative time was 192 min. No conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. No instrument collisions were observed. Estimated blood loss was minimal in all cases. The mean hospital stay was 5.2 days. All patients achieved complete (grade 3) mesorectal excision, with a mean lymph node yield of 16.4 and negative margins in every case. No major postoperative complications were reported.ConclusionsThe full right configuration for robotic rectal resection is associated with favorable short-term outcomes, improved ergonomic conditions, and stable instrument positioning. This layout supports consistent workflow across all operative phases and may reduce intraoperative cognitive load. Further validation through larger comparative studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"495-501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography Fusion Imaging for Posterior Interosseous Artery Perforator Location of Forearm Flap: A Retrospective Study of 23 Patients. 三维计算机断层血管造影融合成像在前臂皮瓣骨间后动脉穿支定位中的应用:23例回顾性研究。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251367265
Shuai Liu, Yan Jiang, Xianyao Tao, Mingyu Xue, Li Qiang

BackgroundFlap surgery necessitates accurate identification of perforator locations for optimal outcomes. Color Doppler Sonography (CDS) has been a routine examination in preoperative planning, but its limitations in providing a comprehensive map of perforators relationships prompts exploration of alternative imaging modalities. This study introduces the application of a novel technique, three-dimensional computed tomography angiography fusion imaging (3D-CTA-FI), for precise interosseous artery perforator locating in forearm flap surgery.MethodA retrospective investigation including 23 patients receiving forearm flap surgery of posterior interosseous artery perforator was conducted, and two-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol was adopted in this study. Utilizing Mimics software, 3D models of vascular structures were meticulously reconstructed. Surgical procedures were guided by the 3D-CTA-FI, and accuracy of CDS and 3D-CTA-FI was evaluated by comparing visual and actual perforator positions.ResultsAll flaps were viable, and patients were discharged uneventfully. In our study, 3D-CTA-FI portrayed accurate depictions of vascular pedicles and perforators. The mean discrepancy between indicated and actual perforator positions was 2.9 ± 1.7 mm (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.7 mm (Group 2), accompanied by excellent consistency rates of 47.8% and 60.9%, respectively.ConclusionsThree-dimensional computed tomography angiography fusion imaging (3D-CTA-FI) provides detailed information of perforators in posterior interosseous artery perforator flap surgery, and its application in clinical practice is feasible and beneficial.

背景:皮瓣手术需要准确识别穿支位置以获得最佳结果。彩色多普勒超声(CDS)一直是术前计划的常规检查,但其在提供射孔器关系的全面地图方面的局限性促使人们探索其他成像方式。本研究介绍了一种新技术的应用,三维计算机断层血管成像融合成像(3D-CTA-FI),用于前臂皮瓣手术中骨间动脉穿支的精确定位。方法对23例接受前臂骨间后动脉穿支皮瓣手术的患者进行回顾性研究,采用两期ct血管造影(CTA)方案。利用Mimics软件,对血管结构的三维模型进行了细致的重建。手术过程由3D-CTA-FI指导,通过比较视觉和实际穿支位置来评估CDS和3D-CTA-FI的准确性。结果皮瓣成活,患者顺利出院。在我们的研究中,3D-CTA-FI描绘了血管蒂和穿支的准确描绘。指征位置与实际穿支位置的平均差异为2.9±1.7 mm(组1)和2.4±1.7 mm(组2),符合率分别为47.8%和60.9%。结论三维计算机断层血管成像融合成像(3D-CTA-FI)在骨间后动脉穿支瓣手术中提供了详细的穿支信息,在临床应用是可行和有益的。
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography Fusion Imaging for Posterior Interosseous Artery Perforator Location of Forearm Flap: A Retrospective Study of 23 Patients.","authors":"Shuai Liu, Yan Jiang, Xianyao Tao, Mingyu Xue, Li Qiang","doi":"10.1177/15533506251367265","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506251367265","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundFlap surgery necessitates accurate identification of perforator locations for optimal outcomes. Color Doppler Sonography (CDS) has been a routine examination in preoperative planning, but its limitations in providing a comprehensive map of perforators relationships prompts exploration of alternative imaging modalities. This study introduces the application of a novel technique, three-dimensional computed tomography angiography fusion imaging (3D-CTA-FI), for precise interosseous artery perforator locating in forearm flap surgery.MethodA retrospective investigation including 23 patients receiving forearm flap surgery of posterior interosseous artery perforator was conducted, and two-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol was adopted in this study. Utilizing Mimics software, 3D models of vascular structures were meticulously reconstructed. Surgical procedures were guided by the 3D-CTA-FI, and accuracy of CDS and 3D-CTA-FI was evaluated by comparing visual and actual perforator positions.ResultsAll flaps were viable, and patients were discharged uneventfully. In our study, 3D-CTA-FI portrayed accurate depictions of vascular pedicles and perforators. The mean discrepancy between indicated and actual perforator positions was 2.9 ± 1.7 mm (Group 1) and 2.4 ± 1.7 mm (Group 2), accompanied by excellent consistency rates of 47.8% and 60.9%, respectively.ConclusionsThree-dimensional computed tomography angiography fusion imaging (3D-CTA-FI) provides detailed information of perforators in posterior interosseous artery perforator flap surgery, and its application in clinical practice is feasible and beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"536-544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144804900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Performance Analysis of AI Engines in Answering American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Questions: A Multi-Subspecialty Evaluation. 人工智能引擎在回答美国外科培训考试问题中的比较性能分析:一个多亚专业评估。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251361664
Nawaf AlShahwan, Ibrahim Majed Fetyani, Mohammed Basem Beyari, Saleh Husam Aldeligan, Maram Basem Beyari, Rayan Saleh Alshehri, Ahmed Alburakan, Hassan Mashbari, Abdulaziz AlKanhal, Thamer Nouh

BackgroundThe rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to its increasing application in the medical field, particularly in providing accurate and reliable information for complex medical queries. PurposeThis study evaluates the performance of four AI engines-Perplexity, Chat GPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini in answering 100 multiple-choice questions derived from the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). A set of questions focused on five surgical subspecialties including colorectal surgery, acute care and trauma surgery (ACS), upper GI Surgery, breast and endocrine surgery, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB).Data collectionWe evaluated these AI engines' ability to provide accurate and focused medical knowledge as the main objective. The research study consisting of a two-month duration was conducted from January 1, 2025, to March 28, 2025. All AI engines received identical questions through then a comparison between correct and wrong responses was performed relative to the ABSITE key answers. Each question was entered manually into the chatbots, ensuring no memory retention bias.Statistical analysisThe researchers conducted their statistical analysis with JASP software for performance evaluation between different subspecialties and AI engines through univariate and multivariate investigations.ResultsAmong the available AI tools, DeepSeek produced the most accurate responses at 74% while Chat GPT delivered 70% accuracy Gemini achieved 69% and Perplexity attained 65%. Results showed that Chat GPT achieved 83.3% accuracy in colorectal surgery yet DeepSeek scored the best at 84.6% and 67.6% for HPB Surgery and ACS respectively. Perplexity achieved a 100% accuracy rate in breast and endocrine surgery which proved to be the highest score recorded throughout the study. The analysis showed that Chat GPT exhibited performance variability between different Surgical subspecialties since it registered significant variations (P < .05), especially in acute care and trauma Surgery. The results of logistic regression indicated that Gemini along with Perplexity scored the most consistent answers among AI systems with a significant odds ratio of 2.5 (P < .01). AI engines show different combinations of precision and reliability when solving medical questions about surgery yet DeepSeek stands out by remaining the most reliable overall.ConclusionsMedical application AI models need additional development because performance results show major differences between medical specialties.

人工智能(AI)的快速发展导致其在医疗领域的应用越来越多,特别是在为复杂的医疗查询提供准确可靠的信息方面。目的:本研究评估了四个人工智能引擎——perplexity、Chat GPT、DeepSeek和Gemini在回答来自美国外科培训考试委员会(ABSITE)的100道选择题中的表现。一组问题集中在五个外科亚专科,包括结肠直肠外科、急性护理和创伤外科(ACS)、上消化道外科、乳腺和内分泌外科以及肝胆胰外科(HPB)。我们评估了这些人工智能引擎提供准确和集中的医学知识作为主要目标的能力。研究时间为2025年1月1日至2025年3月28日,为期2个月。所有人工智能引擎都收到相同的问题,然后相对于ABSITE关键答案进行正确和错误回答的比较。每个问题都是人工输入到聊天机器人中,以确保没有记忆偏差。研究人员通过单变量和多变量调查,利用JASP软件对不同子专业和人工智能引擎之间的性能评估进行了统计分析。在现有的人工智能工具中,DeepSeek的准确率最高,为74%,而Chat GPT的准确率为70%,Gemini的准确率为69%,Perplexity的准确率为65%。结果显示,Chat GPT在结直肠手术中的准确率为83.3%,而DeepSeek在HPB手术和ACS中的准确率分别为84.6%和67.6%。在乳腺和内分泌手术中,Perplexity的准确率达到100%,这是整个研究中记录的最高分。分析表明,Chat GPT表现出不同外科专科之间的差异,因为它记录了显著差异(P < 0.05),特别是在急性护理和创伤外科。逻辑回归结果表明,Gemini和Perplexity在人工智能系统中获得了最一致的答案,优势比为2.5 (P < 0.01)。人工智能引擎在解决有关外科手术的医疗问题时,表现出了不同的精度和可靠性组合,但DeepSeek在总体上仍然是最可靠的。结论医疗应用人工智能模型在不同医学专业的性能差异较大,需要进一步开发。
{"title":"Comparative Performance Analysis of AI Engines in Answering American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Questions: A Multi-Subspecialty Evaluation.","authors":"Nawaf AlShahwan, Ibrahim Majed Fetyani, Mohammed Basem Beyari, Saleh Husam Aldeligan, Maram Basem Beyari, Rayan Saleh Alshehri, Ahmed Alburakan, Hassan Mashbari, Abdulaziz AlKanhal, Thamer Nouh","doi":"10.1177/15533506251361664","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506251361664","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to its increasing application in the medical field, particularly in providing accurate and reliable information for complex medical queries. PurposeThis study evaluates the performance of four AI engines-Perplexity, Chat GPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini in answering 100 multiple-choice questions derived from the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE). A set of questions focused on five surgical subspecialties including colorectal surgery, acute care and trauma surgery (ACS), upper GI Surgery, breast and endocrine surgery, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB).Data collectionWe evaluated these AI engines' ability to provide accurate and focused medical knowledge as the main objective. The research study consisting of a two-month duration was conducted from January 1, 2025, to March 28, 2025. All AI engines received identical questions through then a comparison between correct and wrong responses was performed relative to the ABSITE key answers. Each question was entered manually into the chatbots, ensuring no memory retention bias.Statistical analysisThe researchers conducted their statistical analysis with JASP software for performance evaluation between different subspecialties and AI engines through univariate and multivariate investigations.ResultsAmong the available AI tools, DeepSeek produced the most accurate responses at 74% while Chat GPT delivered 70% accuracy Gemini achieved 69% and Perplexity attained 65%. Results showed that Chat GPT achieved 83.3% accuracy in colorectal surgery yet DeepSeek scored the best at 84.6% and 67.6% for HPB Surgery and ACS respectively. Perplexity achieved a 100% accuracy rate in breast and endocrine surgery which proved to be the highest score recorded throughout the study. The analysis showed that Chat GPT exhibited performance variability between different Surgical subspecialties since it registered significant variations (<i>P</i> < .05), especially in acute care and trauma Surgery. The results of logistic regression indicated that Gemini along with Perplexity scored the most consistent answers among AI systems with a significant odds ratio of 2.5 (<i>P</i> < .01). AI engines show different combinations of precision and reliability when solving medical questions about surgery yet DeepSeek stands out by remaining the most reliable overall.ConclusionsMedical application AI models need additional development because performance results show major differences between medical specialties.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"502-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144643608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shaping the Future of Surgical Procedures: A Bibliometric Analysis of Advanced Polymeric Surgical Materials Research in the Last Decade. 塑造外科手术的未来:过去十年先进高分子外科材料研究的文献计量学分析。
IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1177/15533506251367251
Wenhan Wu

AimThis study aims to systematically analyze the global research landscape of polymeric materials in surgical applications, identifying core themes, technological trends, and clinical translation potential over the past decade.MethodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (2016-2025). A targeted search strategy combining polymer-related, surgery-related, and functional biomedical keywords was applied. Data were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer to explore publication trends, international collaborations, keyword co-occurrence, and citation networks. Key studies were manually reviewed to interpret their technological contributions.ResultsA total of 4668 original articles were retrieved, showing a 15.8% annual growth. China led global output (49.9%), followed by the USA. Keyword clustering revealed four major themes: nanoparticle-based drug delivery, biological responses and angiogenesis, clinical surgical applications (eg, hemostasis, adhesion), and multifunctional hydrogels. Research hotspots included antibacterial, adhesive, and hemostatic materials. Highly cited studies focused on injectable, self-healing, and bioactive hydrogels for complex wound repair and organ-specific applications.ConclusionThe field of surgical polymeric materials is rapidly advancing toward multifunctional, minimally invasive, and responsive systems. This bibliometric study provides a data-driven knowledge map to guide future research and promote clinical translation, helping bridge the gap between material innovation and surgical application. Future research should also focus on optimizing the scalability and cost-effectiveness of these technologies while addressing regulatory and safety challenges. Large-scale clinical trials and interdisciplinary education help bridge the gap between materials science and clinical implementation.

目的本研究旨在系统分析全球高分子材料在外科应用方面的研究概况,确定过去十年的核心主题、技术趋势和临床转化潜力。方法采用Web of Science核心馆藏(2016-2025)进行文献计量分析。结合聚合物相关、外科相关和功能生物医学关键词的目标搜索策略被应用。使用Bibliometrix R软件包和VOSviewer对数据进行分析,以探索出版趋势、国际合作、关键词共现和引文网络。关键研究被人工审查,以解释它们在技术上的贡献。结果共检索原创文章4668篇,年增长率为15.8%。中国领先全球产出(49.9%),其次是美国。关键词聚类揭示了四个主要主题:基于纳米颗粒的药物递送、生物反应和血管生成、临床外科应用(如止血、粘连)和多功能水凝胶。研究热点包括抗菌、黏合剂、止血材料等。高引用的研究主要集中在可注射、自愈和生物活性水凝胶,用于复杂伤口修复和器官特异性应用。结论外科高分子材料领域正朝着多功能、微创、反应灵敏的方向快速发展。这项文献计量学研究提供了一个数据驱动的知识图谱,以指导未来的研究和促进临床转化,帮助弥合材料创新和手术应用之间的差距。未来的研究还应侧重于优化这些技术的可扩展性和成本效益,同时解决监管和安全方面的挑战。大规模临床试验和跨学科教育有助于弥合材料科学与临床应用之间的差距。
{"title":"Shaping the Future of Surgical Procedures: A Bibliometric Analysis of Advanced Polymeric Surgical Materials Research in the Last Decade.","authors":"Wenhan Wu","doi":"10.1177/15533506251367251","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15533506251367251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimThis study aims to systematically analyze the global research landscape of polymeric materials in surgical applications, identifying core themes, technological trends, and clinical translation potential over the past decade.MethodsA bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (2016-2025). A targeted search strategy combining polymer-related, surgery-related, and functional biomedical keywords was applied. Data were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer to explore publication trends, international collaborations, keyword co-occurrence, and citation networks. Key studies were manually reviewed to interpret their technological contributions.ResultsA total of 4668 original articles were retrieved, showing a 15.8% annual growth. China led global output (49.9%), followed by the USA. Keyword clustering revealed four major themes: nanoparticle-based drug delivery, biological responses and angiogenesis, clinical surgical applications (eg, hemostasis, adhesion), and multifunctional hydrogels. Research hotspots included antibacterial, adhesive, and hemostatic materials. Highly cited studies focused on injectable, self-healing, and bioactive hydrogels for complex wound repair and organ-specific applications.ConclusionThe field of surgical polymeric materials is rapidly advancing toward multifunctional, minimally invasive, and responsive systems. This bibliometric study provides a data-driven knowledge map to guide future research and promote clinical translation, helping bridge the gap between material innovation and surgical application. Future research should also focus on optimizing the scalability and cost-effectiveness of these technologies while addressing regulatory and safety challenges. Large-scale clinical trials and interdisciplinary education help bridge the gap between materials science and clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"524-535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144795541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Innovation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1