Small GTPases最新文献

LRRK2 is a multi-domain Ser/Thr kinase that is associated with inherited and sporadic cases of Parkinson's disease. Many mutations linked to disease are associated within a central ROC-COR regulatory region and the subsequent kinase domain, leading to enhanced catalytic activity. The N-terminus of human LRRK2 consists of armadillo repeat motifs (ARMs) followed by ankyrin repeats (ANKs). Recently, Rab GTPases have emerged as key players in LRRK2 function, both as substrates of the kinase, and as regulators of the catalytic activity. Rabs recruit effector proteins via their GTP-dependent switch 1 and 2 regions to distinct sub-cellular compartments to regulate membrane trafficking. LRRK2 phosphorylates Rab8, Rab10 and Rab12 in switch 2, and this activity is regulated via interactions with Rab29. Furthermore, the related Rab32-subfamily GTPases, Rab32 and Rab38, have also been shown to interact with LRRK2. Here, we have mapped the interactions of the Rab32-subfamily to the ARM domain of LRRK2. The complexes are dependent on the GTP state of the Rabs in vitro, implying that LRRK2 may be an effector of the Rab32-subfamily of small GTPases. X-ray crystal structures of the Rab32-family GTPases and subsequent mutational studies reveal that a positively charged residue in switch 1 is critical for binding of Rab32/38 to LRRK2. Homology modelling and mutational analyses of the ARM domain point to a patch of negatively charged residues that contribute to complex formation. These structural and biochemical studies provide a framework for understanding the molecular basis for Rab regulation of LRRK2 and its role in Parkinson's disease.

Glioblastoma is an aggressive and incurable form of brain cancer. Both mutation analysis in human glioblastoma and mouse modelling studies have shown that aberrant activation of the PI 3-kinase pathway is a central driver of glioblastoma malignancy. The small GTPase Rac is activated downstream of this pathway, mediating a subset of the effects of aberrant PI 3-kinase pathway activation. Here I discuss the current state of our knowledge on Rac activation mechanisms in glioblastoma. Current knowledge on roles for specific PI 3-kinase pathway responsive Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factors in glioblastoma is reviewed. Rac is best known for its role in promoting cell motility and invasion, but there is also evidence for roles in multiple other cellular processes with cancer relevance, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, DNA damage responses, metabolism, angiogenesis and immunosuppression. I review what is known about the role of Rac in these processes in glioblastoma. Finally, I assess possible strategies to inhibit this pathway in glioblastoma through either direct inhibition of Rac or inhibition of upstream activators or downstream mediators of Rac signalling.

Cell migration frequently involves the formation of lamellipodial protrusions, the initiation of which requires Rac GTPases signalling to heteropentameric WAVE regulatory complex (WRC). While Rac-related RhoG and Cdc42 can potently stimulate lamellipodium formation, so far presumed to occur by upstream signalling to Rac activation, we show here that the latter can be bypassed by RhoG and Cdc42 given that WRC has been artificially activated. This evidence arises from generation of B16-F1 cells simultaneously lacking both Rac GTPases and WRC, followed by reconstitution of lamellipodia formation with specific Rho-GTPase and differentially active WRC variant combinations. We conclude that formation of canonical lamellipodia requires WRC activation through Rac, but can possibly be tuned, in addition, by WRC interactions with RhoG and Cdc42.

Activating somatic K-Ras mutations are associated with >15% all human tumors and up to 90% of specific tumor types such as pancreatic cancer. Successfully inhibiting abnormal K-Ras signaling would therefore be a game changer in cancer therapy. However, K-Ras has long been considered an undruggable target for various reasons. This view is now changing by the discovery of allosteric inhibitors that directly target K-Ras and inhibit its functions, and by the identification of new mechanisms to dislodge it from the plasma membrane and thereby abrogate its cellular activities. In this review, we will discuss recent progresses and challenges to inhibiting aberrant K-Ras functions by these two approaches. We will also provide a broad overview of other approaches such as inhibition of K-Ras effectors, and offer a brief perspective on the way forward.

Rho proteins are signalling molecules that control cellular dynamics, movement and morphological changes. They are activated by Rho guanine-nucleotide exchange factors (Rho GEFs) that transduce upstream signals into Rho-mediated activation of downstream processes. Fgd5 is a Rho GEF involved in angiogenesis and its target Rho protein for this process has been linked to Cdc42 activation. Here, we examined the function of purified Fgd5, specifically, which Rho proteins it activates and pinpoint the structural domains required for enzymatic activity. Using a GEF enzyme assay, we found that purified Fgd5 showed preferential activation of Rac1 and direct binding of Rac1 in pull-down and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Structural comparisons showed that the Fgd5 DH domain is highly similar to the Rac1 GEF, TrioN, supporting a role for Fgd5 as a Rac1 GEF. Compounds that bind to purified Fgd5 DH-PH protein were identified by screening a small molecule library via surface plasmon resonance. The effects of eleven ligands were further examined for their ability to inhibit the Fgd5 GEF enzymatic activity and Rac1 interaction. From these studies, we found that the compound aurintricarboxylic acid, and to a lesser extent mitoxantrone dihydrochloride, inhibited both Fgd5 GEF activation of Rac1 and their interaction. Aurintricarboxylic acid had no effect on the activity or binding of the Rac1 GEF, TrioN, thus demonstrating the feasibility of selectively disrupting Rho GEF activators. Abbreviations: a.a.: amino acid; ATA: aurintricarboxylic acid; DH: Dbl homology; DOCK: dictator of cytokinesis; Fgd: faciogenital dysplasia; GEF: guanine-nucleotide exchange factor; GST: glutathione S-transferase; LOPAC: library of pharmacologically active compounds; PH: pleckstrin homology; PDB: protein data bank; s.e.m.: standard error of the mean; SPR: surface plasmon resonance.

Small GTPases, together with their regulatory and effector molecules, are key intermediaries in the complex signalling pathways that control almost all cellular processes, working as molecular switches to transduce extracellular cues into cellular responses that drive vital functions, such as intracellular transport, biomolecule synthesis, gene activation and cell survival. How all of these networks are linked to metabolic pathways is a subject of intensive study. Because any response to cellular action requires some form of energy input, elucidating how cells coordinate the signals that lead to a tangible response involving metabolism is central to understand cellular activities. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of the crosstalk between small GTPases of the Ras superfamily, specifically Rac1 and Ras/Rap1, and glycogen phosphorylase in T lymphocytes. Abbreviations: ADCY: adenylyl cyclase; ADCY6: adenylyl cyclase 6; BCR: B cell receptor; cAMP: 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CRIB: Cdc42/Rac binding domain; DLPFC: dysfunction of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; Epac2: exchange protein directly activated by cAMP; GDP: guanodine-5'-diphosphate; GPCRs: G protein-coupled receptors; GTP: guanodin-5'-triphosphate; IL2: interleukin 2; IL2-R: interleukin 2 receptor; JAK: janus kinases; MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase; O-GlcNAc: O-glycosylation; PAK1: p21 activated kinase 1; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PK: phosphorylase kinase; PKA: cAMP-dependent protein kinase A; PKCθ: protein kinase Cθ; PLCγ: phospholipase Cγ; Src: proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase c; STAT: signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins.

Small GTPases (e.g., Rac1) play key roles in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in the β-cell. We investigated regulation by RhoGDIβ of glucose-induced activation of Rac1 and insulin secretion. RhoGDIβ is expressed in INS-1 832/13 cells, rodent and human islets. siRNA-mediated knockdown of RhoGDIβ in INS-1 832/13 cells significantly attenuated glucose-induced Rac1 activation without affecting its translocation and membrane association. Further, suppression of RhoGDIβ expression exerted minimal effects on GSIS at the height of inhibition of Rac1 activation, suggesting divergent effects of RhoGDIβ on Rac1 activation and insulin secretion in the glucose-stimulated β-cell. We provide the first evidence for the expression of RhoGDIβ in rodent and human β-cells, and its differential regulatory roles of this protein in G protein activation and GSIS. Abbreviations: Arf6: ADP ribosylation factor; Cdc42: Cell Division Cycle; GAP: GTPase-activating protein; GDI: GDP dissociation inhibitor; GDIα: GDP dissociation inhibitorα; GDIβ: GDP dissociation inhibitorβ; GEF: Guanine nucleotide exchange factor; GSIS: Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion; Rac1: Ras-Related C3 Botulinum Toxin Substrate 1.

The RAS family of genes (HRAS, NRAS, and KRAS) is mutated in around 30% of human tumours. Wild-type RAS isoforms play an important role in mutant RAS-driven oncogenesis, indicating that RasGEFs may play a significant role in mutant RAS-driven transformation. We recently reported a hierarchical requirement for SOS2 in mutant RAS-driven transformation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts, with KRAS>NRAS>HRAS (Sheffels et al., 2018). However, whether SOS2 deletion differentially affects mutant RAS isoform-dependent transformation in human tumour cell lines has not been tested. After validating sgRNAs that efficiently deleted HRAS and NRAS, we showed that the differential requirement for SOS2 to support anchorage-independent (3D) growth, which we previously demonstrated in MEFs, held true in cancer cells. KRAS-mutant cells showed a high dependence on SOS2 for 3D growth, as previously shown, whereas HRAS-mutant cells did not require SOS2 for 3D growth. This differential requirement was not due to differences in RTK-stimulated WT RAS activation, as SOS2 deletion reduced RTK-stimulated WT RAS/PI3K/AKT signalling in both HRAS and KRAS mutated cell lines. Instead, this differential requirement of SOS2 to promote transformation was due to the differential sensitivity of RAS-mutated cancer cells to reductions in WT RAS/PI3K/AKT signalling. KRAS mutated cancer cells required SOS2/PI3K signaling to protect them from anoikis, whereas survival of both HRAS and NRAS mutated cancer cells was not altered by SOS2 deletion. Finally, we present an integrated working model of SOS signaling in the context of mutant KRAS based on our findings and those of others.

RhoA and RhoC contribute to the regulation of glutamine metabolism, which is a crucial determinant of cell growth in some types of cancer. Here we investigated the participation of RhoA and RhoC in the response of prostate cancer cells to glutamine deprivation. We found that RhoA and RhoC activities were up- or downregulated by glutamine reduction in PC3 and LNCaP cell lines, which was concomitant to a reduction in cell number and proliferation. Stable overexpression of wild type RhoA or RhoC did not alter the sensitivity to glutamine deprivation. However, PC3 cells expressing dominant negative RhoA^N19 or RhoC^N19 mutants were more resistant to glutamine deprivation. Our results indicate that RhoA and RhoC activities could affect cancer treatments targeting the glutamine pathway.