首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Long-term incidence of bariatric related procedures following laparoscopic gastric bypass: 15 to 20 years single institution experience. 腹腔镜胃旁路术后减肥相关手术的长期发生率:15 至 20 年的单一机构经验。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11394-6
Luis Pina, Tanner Roser, David M Parker, G Craig Wood, Lynzi Smith, Jennifer F Bekker, Joseph Nguyen-Lee, Alvin Chang, Anthony T Petrick, Vladan Obradovic

Background: Long-term data on the likelihood of undergoing additional related operations after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) remain scarce.

Objectives: The aims of this study are to identify the long-term incidence of bariatric related operations, patient's predictive factors, and most common operations in the 15-20 years following LRYGB.

Setting: Single Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all LRYGB performed at Single Institution from 2003 to 2008. All subsequent bariatric related operations performed were manually reviewed, excluding upper endoscopies. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the time to procedure. Cox regression was used to determine patient's factors associated with time until procedure.

Results: Of the 665 patients included, the median follow-up was 14 years. There were 248 (37.3%) patients with a related operation. After excluding panniculectomy, 199 (29.9%) had a related operation. The 3 most common operations were panniculectomy [n = 77 (12%)], followed by cholecystectomy [n = 64 (10%)], and internal hernia repair [n = 56 (8%)]. The Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of related operation at 15 years was 43.7% and 35.3% after excluding panniculectomy. Females (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = [1.20, 2.62, p = 0.0039), age < 50 (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.88], p = 0.014), and BMI > 60 (HR = 2.77, 95% CI = [1.30, 5.91], p = 0.0083) were more likely to have a related operation.

Conclusion: Bariatric related operations are common after LRYGB. Nearly half of patients will eventually undergo a secondary operation as they approach 20 years post-LRYGB.

背景:关于腹腔镜鲁式胃旁路术(LRYGB)后接受其他相关手术的可能性的长期数据仍然很少:本研究旨在确定减肥相关手术的长期发生率、患者的预测因素以及 LRYGB 术后 15-20 年内最常见的手术:单一学术机构,减肥卓越中心:方法:我们对 2003 年至 2008 年在单一机构进行的所有 LRYGB 手术进行了回顾性分析。我们对随后进行的所有减肥相关手术进行了人工回顾,但不包括上内镜手术。采用卡普兰-梅尔分析法估算手术时间。采用考克斯回归法确定与手术时间相关的患者因素:结果:在纳入的 665 名患者中,中位随访时间为 14 年。有 248 名患者(37.3%)接受过相关手术。剔除泛影葡胺切除术后,有 199 名患者(29.9%)接受过相关手术。最常见的 3 种手术是盘状疝切除术[77 例(12%)],其次是胆囊切除术[64 例(10%)]和内疝修补术[56 例(8%)]。15 年后相关手术的 Kaplan-Meier 估计发生率为 43.7%,排除泛结肠切除术后为 35.3%。女性(HR = 1.77,95% CI = [1.20,2.62,p = 0.0039)、60 岁(HR = 2.77,95% CI = [1.30,5.91],p = 0.0083)更有可能进行相关手术:结论:LRYGB术后与减肥相关的手术很常见。结论:LRYGB术后进行减肥相关手术很常见,近一半的患者在LRYGB术后20年时会接受二次手术。
{"title":"Long-term incidence of bariatric related procedures following laparoscopic gastric bypass: 15 to 20 years single institution experience.","authors":"Luis Pina, Tanner Roser, David M Parker, G Craig Wood, Lynzi Smith, Jennifer F Bekker, Joseph Nguyen-Lee, Alvin Chang, Anthony T Petrick, Vladan Obradovic","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11394-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11394-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term data on the likelihood of undergoing additional related operations after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this study are to identify the long-term incidence of bariatric related operations, patient's predictive factors, and most common operations in the 15-20 years following LRYGB.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Academic Institution, Center of Bariatric Excellence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of all LRYGB performed at Single Institution from 2003 to 2008. All subsequent bariatric related operations performed were manually reviewed, excluding upper endoscopies. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to estimate the time to procedure. Cox regression was used to determine patient's factors associated with time until procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 665 patients included, the median follow-up was 14 years. There were 248 (37.3%) patients with a related operation. After excluding panniculectomy, 199 (29.9%) had a related operation. The 3 most common operations were panniculectomy [n = 77 (12%)], followed by cholecystectomy [n = 64 (10%)], and internal hernia repair [n = 56 (8%)]. The Kaplan-Meier estimated incidence of related operation at 15 years was 43.7% and 35.3% after excluding panniculectomy. Females (HR = 1.77, 95% CI = [1.20, 2.62, p = 0.0039), age < 50 (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = [1.07, 1.88], p = 0.014), and BMI > 60 (HR = 2.77, 95% CI = [1.30, 5.91], p = 0.0083) were more likely to have a related operation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bariatric related operations are common after LRYGB. Nearly half of patients will eventually undergo a secondary operation as they approach 20 years post-LRYGB.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of DCI with number of preoperative comorbidities and 30-day outcomes following inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of the ACHQC database. 腹股沟疝修补术后 DCI 与术前合并症数量和 30 天预后的关系:ACHQC 数据库分析。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11381-x
Maha Mourad, Julie E Kim, Sharon E Phillips, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins

Introduction: The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is a stratification tool that captures socioeconomic disparities based on zip code. To date, no prior study has investigated the association of DCI score and inguinal hernia repair outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the association between DCI score and 30-day outcomes following inguinal hernia repair using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database. We hypothesize that patients with higher DCI scores will have a higher number of comorbidities and 30-day postoperative events.

Methods and procedures: All patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair from 2015 to 2023 with an available DCI score and 30-day follow-up data available were included. Patients were stratified into DCI quintiles based on zip code. Primary outcomes of interest were 30-day hernia-specific postoperative outcomes. Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare DCI scores with comorbid conditions and perioperative outcomes.

Results: 30,927 patients were included for analysis; 12,206 patients were classified as prosperous (40%), 7190 patients as comfortable (23%), 4884 patients as mid-tier (16%), 3485 patients as at-risk (11%), and 3162 as distressed (10%). Distressed patients were more likely to have ASA 3 or higher and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, ESRD, and COPD (p < 0.001). Patients with higher DCI scores were significantly more likely to undergo an emergency operation and have a longer OR time (p < 0.001). Distressed patients were also more likely to experience a major wound complication requiring readmission (p = 0.05) and reoperation (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: DCI scores are strongly linked to surgical risk and outcomes following inguinal hernia repair. Special consideration should be given to DCI scores when optimizing patients prior to inguinal hernia repair.

导言:窘迫社区指数(DCI)是一种分层工具,可根据邮政编码捕捉社会经济差异。迄今为止,还没有研究调查过 DCI 分数与腹股沟疝修补术结果之间的关系。本研究旨在利用腹部核心健康质量协作(ACHQC)数据库评估 DCI 评分与腹股沟疝修补术后 30 天预后之间的关联。我们假设,DCI评分越高的患者合并症越多,术后30天发生的事件也越多:纳入2015年至2023年接受腹股沟疝修补术的所有患者,这些患者均有DCI评分和30天随访数据。根据邮政编码将患者分为DCI五等分。主要研究结果为 30 天疝气特异性术后结果。采用皮尔逊卡方检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较 DCI 评分与合并症和围手术期结果:30,927 名患者被纳入分析;12,206 名患者被归类为富裕(40%),7,190 名患者被归类为舒适(23%),4,884 名患者被归类为中等(16%),3,485 名患者被归类为高危(11%),3,162 名患者被归类为窘迫(10%)。窘迫患者更有可能患有 ASA 3 或更高以及包括高血压、糖尿病、ESRD 和慢性阻塞性肺病在内的并发症(P 结论:DCI 评分与手术风险密切相关:DCI 评分与腹股沟疝修补术后的手术风险和结果密切相关。在腹股沟疝修补术前对患者进行优化时,应特别考虑 DCI 评分。
{"title":"Association of DCI with number of preoperative comorbidities and 30-day outcomes following inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of the ACHQC database.","authors":"Maha Mourad, Julie E Kim, Sharon E Phillips, Vishal M Kothari, Ivy N Haskins","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11381-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11381-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is a stratification tool that captures socioeconomic disparities based on zip code. To date, no prior study has investigated the association of DCI score and inguinal hernia repair outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the association between DCI score and 30-day outcomes following inguinal hernia repair using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database. We hypothesize that patients with higher DCI scores will have a higher number of comorbidities and 30-day postoperative events.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>All patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair from 2015 to 2023 with an available DCI score and 30-day follow-up data available were included. Patients were stratified into DCI quintiles based on zip code. Primary outcomes of interest were 30-day hernia-specific postoperative outcomes. Pearson's chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare DCI scores with comorbid conditions and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30,927 patients were included for analysis; 12,206 patients were classified as prosperous (40%), 7190 patients as comfortable (23%), 4884 patients as mid-tier (16%), 3485 patients as at-risk (11%), and 3162 as distressed (10%). Distressed patients were more likely to have ASA 3 or higher and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, ESRD, and COPD (p < 0.001). Patients with higher DCI scores were significantly more likely to undergo an emergency operation and have a longer OR time (p < 0.001). Distressed patients were also more likely to experience a major wound complication requiring readmission (p = 0.05) and reoperation (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCI scores are strongly linked to surgical risk and outcomes following inguinal hernia repair. Special consideration should be given to DCI scores when optimizing patients prior to inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on completing bariatric surgery at a single academic institution. 健康的社会决定因素 (SDOH) 对一家学术机构完成减肥手术的影响。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11364-y
Sabrena F Noria, Keeley J Pratt, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Kayla Diaz, Bayan Shalash, Daniel Abul-Khoudoud, Bradley Needleman, Maximiliano Magallanes

Background: Underutilization of bariatric surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to understand the association of SDOH on not achieving surgery.

Methods: 1081 applications for primary MBS from January-December 2021 were stratified into those that completed surgery (COM; n = 415), in progress > 1-year (IP; n = 107), dropped out (DO; n = 379), and never started (NS; n = 180). Using the American-Community-Survey results (2015-2020) and patient zip-codes, population differences in 4-domains of SDOH (demographic/social/housing/economic) were examined between COM versus the other groups. Additionally, using institutional MBSAQIP and EMR data, patient-specific differences in comorbidities were evaluated for COM versus IP/DO. Univariate analysis using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests were used for continuous and/or categorical variables. For patient-level analysis multinomial logistic regression was used to determine predictors of not achieving surgery. Hypothesis testing was conducted at an overall 5 percent type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05) and Bonferroni's method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.

Results: Compared to COM, IP-patients resided in zip-codes characterized by fewer married people (43% vs 46%; p = 0.019), lower education levels (49% vs 43%; p = 0.048), more households where rent was > 50% of household income (10% vs 8%, p = 0.002), and households below the poverty line (17.6% vs 14.5%, p = 0.017). At the patient-level, IP were more likely to be male (27.9% vs 14.9%; p = 0.014), publicly insured (44.9% vs 28.4%; p = 0.004), Black (35.5% vs 22.2%; p = 0.006), an active smoker (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.018), have a higher BMI (49.6 vs 47.6; p = 0.01), and coronary intervention (5.8% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Comparison of COM vs DO was similar for both phases. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression demonstrated higher BMI (OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05, p = 0.001), males (OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32, p = 0.024), smoking (OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02, p = 0.002), and Medicaid (OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49, p = 0.002) independently predicted not achieving surgery.

Conclusion: Patient-level data demonstrated social not clinical factors predicted surgery completion. Given zip-codes characterizing the IP/DO groups had a greater prevalence of social risk, more attention needs to be directed patient-level social risks.

背景:减肥手术使用不足是多因素造成的。本研究旨在了解 SDOH 与未完成手术之间的关系。方法:将 2021 年 1 月至 12 月期间 1081 份初级 MBS 申请分层为完成手术(COM;n = 415)、进行中 > 1 年(IP;n = 107)、退出(DO;n = 379)和从未开始(NS;n = 180)。利用美国社区调查结果(2015-2020 年)和患者邮政编码,研究了 COM 与其他组别之间在 SDOH 4 个领域(人口/社会/住房/经济)的人群差异。此外,还利用机构 MBSAQIP 和 EMR 数据,评估了 COM 与 IP/DO 患者在特定合并症方面的差异。对于连续变量和/或分类变量,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 单变量分析、卡方检验/费舍尔精确检验。对于患者层面的分析,则采用多项式逻辑回归来确定无法完成手术的预测因素。假设检验以总体5%的I型错误率(α=0.05)进行,并使用Bonferroni方法对多重比较进行调整:与COM相比,IP患者所居住的邮政编码的特点是:已婚人数较少(43% vs 46%;p = 0.019),教育水平较低(49% vs 43%;p = 0.048),房租超过家庭收入50%的家庭较多(10% vs 8%,p = 0.002),贫困线以下的家庭较多(17.6% vs 14.5%,p = 0.017)。在患者层面,IP 更有可能是男性(27.9% vs 14.9%;p = 0.014)、有公共保险(44.9% vs 28.4%;p = 0.004)、黑人(35.5% vs 22.2%;p = 0.006)、活跃吸烟者(8.9% vs 2.2%;p = 0.018)、体重指数较高(49.6 vs 47.6;p = 0.01)和冠状动脉介入者(5.8% vs 1.7%,p = 0.034)。两个阶段中,COM 与 DO 的比较结果相似。多项式多变量逻辑回归显示,BMI(OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05,p = 0.001)、男性(OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32,p = 0.024)、吸烟(OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02,p = 0.002)和医疗补助(OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49,p = 0.002)独立预测了不接受手术的风险:结论:患者层面的数据表明,社会因素而非临床因素可预测手术完成情况。鉴于IP/DO群体的邮政编码具有更大的社会风险,因此需要更多关注患者层面的社会风险。
{"title":"The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on completing bariatric surgery at a single academic institution.","authors":"Sabrena F Noria, Keeley J Pratt, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul, Kayla Diaz, Bayan Shalash, Daniel Abul-Khoudoud, Bradley Needleman, Maximiliano Magallanes","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11364-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11364-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Underutilization of bariatric surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to understand the association of SDOH on not achieving surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1081 applications for primary MBS from January-December 2021 were stratified into those that completed surgery (COM; n = 415), in progress > 1-year (IP; n = 107), dropped out (DO; n = 379), and never started (NS; n = 180). Using the American-Community-Survey results (2015-2020) and patient zip-codes, population differences in 4-domains of SDOH (demographic/social/housing/economic) were examined between COM versus the other groups. Additionally, using institutional MBSAQIP and EMR data, patient-specific differences in comorbidities were evaluated for COM versus IP/DO. Univariate analysis using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests were used for continuous and/or categorical variables. For patient-level analysis multinomial logistic regression was used to determine predictors of not achieving surgery. Hypothesis testing was conducted at an overall 5 percent type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05) and Bonferroni's method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to COM, IP-patients resided in zip-codes characterized by fewer married people (43% vs 46%; p = 0.019), lower education levels (49% vs 43%; p = 0.048), more households where rent was > 50% of household income (10% vs 8%, p = 0.002), and households below the poverty line (17.6% vs 14.5%, p = 0.017). At the patient-level, IP were more likely to be male (27.9% vs 14.9%; p = 0.014), publicly insured (44.9% vs 28.4%; p = 0.004), Black (35.5% vs 22.2%; p = 0.006), an active smoker (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.018), have a higher BMI (49.6 vs 47.6; p = 0.01), and coronary intervention (5.8% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Comparison of COM vs DO was similar for both phases. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression demonstrated higher BMI (OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05, p = 0.001), males (OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32, p = 0.024), smoking (OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02, p = 0.002), and Medicaid (OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49, p = 0.002) independently predicted not achieving surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-level data demonstrated social not clinical factors predicted surgery completion. Given zip-codes characterizing the IP/DO groups had a greater prevalence of social risk, more attention needs to be directed patient-level social risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628471","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic transabdominal vs. totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences. 腹腔镜经腹腹股沟疝修补术与完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:疗效、医疗利用率和成本差异。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11380-y
Natalie Liu, Lily N Stalter, Erica L Fletcher, Anne O Lidor

Background: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair utilizes either a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. The literature remains mixed on outcomes comparing TAPP versus TEP. The objective of our study was to assess outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences between TAPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Adult patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from our institution's electronic health record. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using chi-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of experiencing a postoperative emergency department visit, readmission, and/or reoperation within 6 months were surgery. Generalized linear models were used to investigate differences in cost between TAPP and TEP groups.

Results: 1086 patients underwent TAPP repair, while 1277 patients underwent TEP repair. TAPP patients had more than double the rates of readmissions (3.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.002) and reoperations (1.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.001) within 6 months of surgery. On multivariable analysis, undergoing TAPP inguinal hernia repair was associated with higher odds of reoperations and/or readmissions within 6 months of surgery (OR 2.8, CI [1.5, 5.1], p = 0.001). TAPP repair had a higher index surgery cost and higher costs associated with reoperations and readmissions compared to TEP repair.

Conclusion: Although both approaches are very safe, TAPP inguinal hernia repair had higher rates of postoperative complications, increased healthcare utilization, and higher associated costs. Future studies should be directed toward decreasing postoperative healthcare utilization in order to decrease costs in inguinal hernia repair.

背景:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术采用经腹腹膜前(TAPP)或完全腹膜外(TEP)方法。关于 TAPP 与 TEP 的比较结果,文献报道不一。我们的研究旨在评估 TAPP 和 TEP 腹股沟疝修补术的疗效、医疗利用率和成本差异:方法: 我们从本机构的电子病历中回顾性地识别了 2013 年至 2021 年间接受选择性腹股沟疝修补术的成人患者。采用卡方检验比较基线特征和术后并发症。采用多变量逻辑回归来模拟术后 6 个月内急诊就诊、再次入院和/或再次手术的几率。采用广义线性模型研究 TAPP 组和 TEP 组之间的费用差异:结果:1086 名患者接受了 TAPP 修复术,1277 名患者接受了 TEP 修复术。TAPP患者术后6个月内的再住院率(3.1% vs. 1.3%,P = 0.002)和再手术率(1.5% vs. 0.2%,P = 0.001)是TEP患者的两倍多。经多变量分析,接受TAPP腹股沟疝修补术与手术后6个月内再次手术和/或再次入院的几率较高(OR 2.8,CI [1.5,5.1],p = 0.001)有关。与TEP修复术相比,TAPP修复术的手术费用更高,与再次手术和再次入院相关的费用也更高:结论:尽管两种方法都非常安全,但 TAPP 腹股沟疝修补术的术后并发症发生率更高,医疗保健使用率更高,相关费用也更高。未来的研究应着眼于减少术后医疗使用,以降低腹股沟疝修补术的成本。
{"title":"Laparoscopic transabdominal vs. totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences.","authors":"Natalie Liu, Lily N Stalter, Erica L Fletcher, Anne O Lidor","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11380-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11380-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair utilizes either a transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. The literature remains mixed on outcomes comparing TAPP versus TEP. The objective of our study was to assess outcomes, healthcare utilization, and cost differences between TAPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients who underwent elective inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively identified from our institution's electronic health record. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using chi-squared test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the odds of experiencing a postoperative emergency department visit, readmission, and/or reoperation within 6 months were surgery. Generalized linear models were used to investigate differences in cost between TAPP and TEP groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1086 patients underwent TAPP repair, while 1277 patients underwent TEP repair. TAPP patients had more than double the rates of readmissions (3.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.002) and reoperations (1.5% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.001) within 6 months of surgery. On multivariable analysis, undergoing TAPP inguinal hernia repair was associated with higher odds of reoperations and/or readmissions within 6 months of surgery (OR 2.8, CI [1.5, 5.1], p = 0.001). TAPP repair had a higher index surgery cost and higher costs associated with reoperations and readmissions compared to TEP repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both approaches are very safe, TAPP inguinal hernia repair had higher rates of postoperative complications, increased healthcare utilization, and higher associated costs. Future studies should be directed toward decreasing postoperative healthcare utilization in order to decrease costs in inguinal hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 用于腹腔镜手术基本技能培训的增强现实技术:系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5
Jian Xiong, Xiaoqin Dai, Yuyang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Xiyuan Zhou

Background: Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative technology in medical education, particularly in training basic laparoscopic skills. Despite its growing applications, the effectiveness of AR in this specific domain remains underexplored, with a lack of standardized assessment frameworks and inconsistent methodologies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in laparoscopic basic skills training for medical students and junior physicians.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were selected based on their focus on AR applications in laparoscopic training, involving both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Inclusion criteria focused on medical students and novice surgeons, assessing educational outcomes such as Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Global, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Global, OSATS Specific, Training Time, and Subjective Workload.

Results: A total of 12 studies involving 434 participants met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that AR technology significantly improved educational outcomes, with participants achieving higher GOALS and OSATS scores. Specifically, the mean difference for GOALS scores was 2.40 points (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001) and for OSATS scores, 7.71 points (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001). Additionally, AR-assisted training showed a reduction in subjective workload, with a mean decrease of 2.95 points (95% CI [- 4.95, - 0.95], p = 0.003).

Conclusions: The findings indicate that AR significantly enhances laparoscopic training outcomes, facilitating improved technical skills, efficiency, and learner independence. However, variability in study designs and outcomes limits generalizability. Future research should focus on standardize AR training protocols and evaluate long-term effectiveness to fully leverage AR's potential in surgical education.

背景:增强现实(AR)已成为医学教育中的一项变革性技术,尤其是在腹腔镜基本技能培训方面。尽管其应用日益广泛,但增强现实技术在这一特定领域的有效性仍未得到充分探索,缺乏标准化的评估框架,不同研究采用的方法也不一致。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估AR在医学生和初级医师腹腔镜基本技能培训中的有效性:我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 ClinicalTrials.gov。所选研究的重点是腹腔镜培训中的 AR 应用,包括随机对照试验和非随机研究。纳入标准主要针对医学生和外科医生新手,评估的教育成果包括腹腔镜技能全球操作评估(GOALS)全球、技术技能客观结构化评估(OSATS)全球、OSATS特定、培训时间和主观工作量:共有 12 项研究符合纳入标准,涉及 434 名参与者。分析结果表明,AR 技术明显改善了教育成果,参与者获得了更高的 GOALS 和 OSATS 分数。具体来说,GOALS 分数的平均差异为 2.40 分(95% CI [1.30,3.50],p 结论:AR 技术能显著提高腹腔镜手术的成功率:研究结果表明,AR 能显著提高腹腔镜培训效果,促进技术技能、效率和学员独立性的提高。然而,研究设计和结果的差异性限制了其推广性。未来的研究应侧重于标准化 AR 培训方案和评估长期有效性,以充分发挥 AR 在外科教育中的潜力。
{"title":"Augmented reality for basic skills training in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jian Xiong, Xiaoqin Dai, Yuyang Zhang, Xingchao Liu, Xiyuan Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11387-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmented reality (AR) has emerged as a transformative technology in medical education, particularly in training basic laparoscopic skills. Despite its growing applications, the effectiveness of AR in this specific domain remains underexplored, with a lack of standardized assessment frameworks and inconsistent methodologies across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in laparoscopic basic skills training for medical students and junior physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were selected based on their focus on AR applications in laparoscopic training, involving both randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies. Inclusion criteria focused on medical students and novice surgeons, assessing educational outcomes such as Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) Global, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Global, OSATS Specific, Training Time, and Subjective Workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies involving 434 participants met the inclusion criteria. The analysis revealed that AR technology significantly improved educational outcomes, with participants achieving higher GOALS and OSATS scores. Specifically, the mean difference for GOALS scores was 2.40 points (95% CI [1.30, 3.50], p < 0.001) and for OSATS scores, 7.71 points (95% CI [3.39, 12.03], p < 0.001). Additionally, AR-assisted training showed a reduction in subjective workload, with a mean decrease of 2.95 points (95% CI [- 4.95, - 0.95], p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that AR significantly enhances laparoscopic training outcomes, facilitating improved technical skills, efficiency, and learner independence. However, variability in study designs and outcomes limits generalizability. Future research should focus on standardize AR training protocols and evaluate long-term effectiveness to fully leverage AR's potential in surgical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Open versus robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. 腹股沟疝修补术中开放式腹横肌松解术与机器人腹横肌松解术的比较:最新系统综述、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11382-w
Diego L Lima, Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Camila N B de Oliveira, Ana C D Rasador, João P G Kasakewitch, Raquel L Nogueira, Lucas Beffa, Flavio Malcher
<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Posterior component separation using transversus abdominis release (TAR) is well established as an option for repair of large hernia defects. TAR can be performed robotically (rTAR) or open (oTAR) with limited data to demonstrate benefit and guide decision making. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rTAR and oTAR approaches for ventral hernia repair (VHR).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for studies comparing rTAR and oTAR for VHR. Hybrid rTAR was not included in our analysis. Our primary outcomes were overall postoperative and intraoperative complications, surgical site occurrences (SSO), SSO requiring surgical intervention (SSOPI), surgical site infection (SSI) superficial or deep, and fascial closure. Additional outcomes were operative time (OT), readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS). We performed sensitivity analysis to explore reasons for heterogeneity and outliers, and a proportional meta-analysis of conversion during rTAR. We performed a meta-regression exploring the relationship of BMI, hernia defect and mesh width rTAR/oTAR with the analyzed outcome within each study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>503 studies were screened and seven studies were included in this analysis. Our sample totaled 780 patients, of which 298 (38.2%) underwent rTAR. Defect width ranged between 8.7 to 13.5 cm (cm) for rTAR and 10 to 13.5 cm for oTAR. Mean mesh area ranged from 66.9 to 980 cm<sup>2</sup> and from 51.3 to 1344 cm<sup>2</sup> for rTAR and oTAR respectively. We found lower overall complications (9% versus 24.6%; RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.73; P < 0.01) and intraoperative complication (5.9% versus 9.1%; RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.88; P = 0.02) rates for the rTAR group. There was no difference in fascial closure between the groups (99% versus 94.6%; RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11; P = 0.11). rTAR presented lower SSI rates (2.5% versus 7.8%; RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.8; P = 0.01). No differences were found in SSO (16.3% versus 13.7%; RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.48; P = 0.6) or SSOPI (5.4% versus 8.9%%; RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.15; P = 0.1) rates. No statistically significant differences were found in superficial SSI (0.76% versus 3%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.75; P = 0.21) and deep SSI (0% versus 4.2%; RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.02 to 3.12; P = 0.27). Open surgery presented a lower OT (MD -67.7 min; P < 0.001), but robotic surgery showed a reduced LOS (-3.9 days; 95% CI -4.8 to -3.1; P < 0.001). No differences were found in readmission and 1 year recurrence rates. The proportional meta-analysis showed a conversion to open rate of 6.4 per 100 patients (95% CI 3.3 to 12 patients) during rTAR. Meta-regression presented no statistically significant influences of rTAR/oTAR mesh width and defect width relations and BMI, despite the analysis was limited by the low number of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic TAR may be associated with
目的:使用腹横肌松解术(TAR)进行后方组件分离是修复巨大疝缺损的公认方法。TAR 可通过机器人(rTAR)或开腹(oTAR)进行,但能证明其益处并指导决策的数据有限。我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,比较了腹股沟疝修补术(VHR)的rTAR和oTAR方法:我们在 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 和 Web of Science 上搜索了比较 rTAR 和 oTAR 治疗 VHR 的研究。我们的分析不包括混合式 rTAR。我们的主要研究结果是术后和术中总体并发症、手术部位并发症(SSO)、需要手术干预的并发症(SSOPI)、手术部位浅部或深部感染(SSI)以及筋膜闭合情况。其他结果包括手术时间(OT)、再入院率、住院时间(LOS)。我们进行了敏感性分析以探究异质性和异常值的原因,并对 rTAR 期间的转归进行了比例荟萃分析。我们进行了荟萃回归,探讨了BMI、疝缺损和网片宽度rTAR/oTAR与每项研究中分析结果的关系:结果:共筛选出 503 项研究,其中 7 项研究被纳入本次分析。我们的样本共有 780 名患者,其中 298 人(38.2%)接受了 rTAR 治疗。rTAR 的缺损宽度在 8.7 厘米到 13.5 厘米之间,oTAR 的缺损宽度在 10 厘米到 13.5 厘米之间。rTAR 和 oTAR 的平均网片面积分别为 66.9 至 980 平方厘米和 51.3 至 1344 平方厘米。我们发现总的并发症较少(9% 对 24.6%;RR 0.43;95% CI 0.26 对 0.73;P 结论:与 oTAR 相比,机器人 TAR 可降低术中和术后并发症、减少 SSI、缩短 LOS 和延长手术时间。鉴于纳入研究的局限性,需要进行随机试验,以更好地评估机器人辅助手术对复杂腹壁重建的影响:CRD42024540991。
{"title":"Open versus robotic transversus abdominis release for ventral hernia repair: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.","authors":"Diego L Lima, Carlos A Balthazar da Silveira, Camila N B de Oliveira, Ana C D Rasador, João P G Kasakewitch, Raquel L Nogueira, Lucas Beffa, Flavio Malcher","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11382-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11382-w","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim: &lt;/strong&gt;Posterior component separation using transversus abdominis release (TAR) is well established as an option for repair of large hernia defects. TAR can be performed robotically (rTAR) or open (oTAR) with limited data to demonstrate benefit and guide decision making. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rTAR and oTAR approaches for ventral hernia repair (VHR).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Material and methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for studies comparing rTAR and oTAR for VHR. Hybrid rTAR was not included in our analysis. Our primary outcomes were overall postoperative and intraoperative complications, surgical site occurrences (SSO), SSO requiring surgical intervention (SSOPI), surgical site infection (SSI) superficial or deep, and fascial closure. Additional outcomes were operative time (OT), readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS). We performed sensitivity analysis to explore reasons for heterogeneity and outliers, and a proportional meta-analysis of conversion during rTAR. We performed a meta-regression exploring the relationship of BMI, hernia defect and mesh width rTAR/oTAR with the analyzed outcome within each study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;503 studies were screened and seven studies were included in this analysis. Our sample totaled 780 patients, of which 298 (38.2%) underwent rTAR. Defect width ranged between 8.7 to 13.5 cm (cm) for rTAR and 10 to 13.5 cm for oTAR. Mean mesh area ranged from 66.9 to 980 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; and from 51.3 to 1344 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; for rTAR and oTAR respectively. We found lower overall complications (9% versus 24.6%; RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.73; P &lt; 0.01) and intraoperative complication (5.9% versus 9.1%; RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.88; P = 0.02) rates for the rTAR group. There was no difference in fascial closure between the groups (99% versus 94.6%; RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.11; P = 0.11). rTAR presented lower SSI rates (2.5% versus 7.8%; RR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.8; P = 0.01). No differences were found in SSO (16.3% versus 13.7%; RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.48; P = 0.6) or SSOPI (5.4% versus 8.9%%; RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.22 to 1.15; P = 0.1) rates. No statistically significant differences were found in superficial SSI (0.76% versus 3%; RR 0.36; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.75; P = 0.21) and deep SSI (0% versus 4.2%; RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.02 to 3.12; P = 0.27). Open surgery presented a lower OT (MD -67.7 min; P &lt; 0.001), but robotic surgery showed a reduced LOS (-3.9 days; 95% CI -4.8 to -3.1; P &lt; 0.001). No differences were found in readmission and 1 year recurrence rates. The proportional meta-analysis showed a conversion to open rate of 6.4 per 100 patients (95% CI 3.3 to 12 patients) during rTAR. Meta-regression presented no statistically significant influences of rTAR/oTAR mesh width and defect width relations and BMI, despite the analysis was limited by the low number of studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Robotic TAR may be associated with","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of low dose of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate injection for type GOV1 gastric varices combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices. 内镜下注射低剂量硬化剂疗法和氰基丙烯酸酯注射液治疗 GOV1 型胃静脉曲张并联合内镜下静脉曲张结扎术治疗食管静脉曲张的短期疗效和安全性。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11393-7
Tingting Zhang, Chuangyang Xin, Xueyun Guo, Sihai Chen, Xuelian Zheng, Wen Xu, Dongjing Zhang, Biming Li, Ye Chen, Xuan Zhu, Anjiang Wang

Background: To explore the short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic low dose injection of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate for gastric varices (GVs) combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for esophageal varices (EVs) in cirrhosis with type GOV1 varices.

Methods: A total of 521 patients with cirrhosis and GOV1 varices, who were divided into emergence endoscopy treatment layer and secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding layer, were selected. All patients underwent combined therapy or EVL alone (ligation therapy) for the treatment of type GOV1 varices. The baseline between the two groups with significant differences were used as covariates for 1:1 propensity score matching. The early rebleeding rate was compared and the risk factors for rebleeding were identified in each layer.

Results: After propensity score matching, a total of 122 patients were included in the emergence endoscopy treatment layer, and 234 patients were included in the secondary prophylaxis layer. The early rebleeding rates in the combined therapy group vs. ligation therapy group was 4.92% vs. 16.39% (P = 0.04) and 2.56% vs. 1.71% (P = 0.65) in the emergency endoscopy layer and in the secondary prophylaxis layer, respectively. The median length of hospital stay after endoscopy was 8 days vs. 9 days (P = 0.004) and 7 days vs. 6 days (P = 0.47), in each layer respectively. There was no significant difference in the adverse reactions of endoscopic treatment. EVL treatment (OR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.05-13.96; P = 0.04) and discontinuation of NSBB (non-selective beta-blocker) use after discharge (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.20-10.67; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopy in the emergency endoscopy layer.

Conclusion: Combined therapy is comparable with ligation therapy in the short-term efficacy and safety of in cirrhosis patients with secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding while it is superior to EVL alone in cirrhosis in the emergency endoscopy treatment as it could reduce the early rebleeding rate and shorten the length of hospital stay.

研究背景目的:探讨内镜下低剂量注射硬化剂和氰基丙烯酸酯治疗胃静脉曲张(GVs)联合内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)治疗肝硬化合并GOV1型静脉曲张(EVs)的短期疗效和安全性:方法:共选取521例肝硬化合并GOV1型食管静脉曲张患者,将其分为急诊内镜治疗层和二次预防再出血层。所有患者均接受了治疗 GOV1 型静脉曲张的联合疗法或单独 EVL(结扎疗法)。两组之间存在显著差异的基线被用作 1:1 倾向评分匹配的协变量。比较了各层的早期再出血率,并确定了再出血的风险因素:经过倾向评分匹配后,共有122名患者被纳入急诊内镜治疗层,234名患者被纳入二级预防层。在急诊内镜治疗层和二级预防层,联合治疗组与结扎治疗组的早期再出血率分别为4.92%对16.39%(P=0.04)和2.56%对1.71%(P=0.65)。各层内镜检查后的中位住院时间分别为8天对9天(P = 0.004)和7天对6天(P = 0.47)。内镜治疗的不良反应无明显差异。EVL治疗(OR:3.84;95% CI:1.05-13.96;P = 0.04)和出院后停用NSBB(非选择性β-受体阻滞剂)(OR:3.58;95% CI:1.20-10.67;P = 0.02)是急诊内镜层内镜术后早期再出血的独立危险因素:联合疗法在肝硬化患者二次预防再出血的短期疗效和安全性方面与结扎疗法相当,而在肝硬化急诊内镜治疗中,联合疗法优于单独的EVL疗法,因为它可以降低早期再出血率并缩短住院时间。
{"title":"Short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of low dose of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate injection for type GOV1 gastric varices combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices.","authors":"Tingting Zhang, Chuangyang Xin, Xueyun Guo, Sihai Chen, Xuelian Zheng, Wen Xu, Dongjing Zhang, Biming Li, Ye Chen, Xuan Zhu, Anjiang Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11393-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11393-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic low dose injection of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate for gastric varices (GVs) combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for esophageal varices (EVs) in cirrhosis with type GOV1 varices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 521 patients with cirrhosis and GOV1 varices, who were divided into emergence endoscopy treatment layer and secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding layer, were selected. All patients underwent combined therapy or EVL alone (ligation therapy) for the treatment of type GOV1 varices. The baseline between the two groups with significant differences were used as covariates for 1:1 propensity score matching. The early rebleeding rate was compared and the risk factors for rebleeding were identified in each layer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, a total of 122 patients were included in the emergence endoscopy treatment layer, and 234 patients were included in the secondary prophylaxis layer. The early rebleeding rates in the combined therapy group vs. ligation therapy group was 4.92% vs. 16.39% (P = 0.04) and 2.56% vs. 1.71% (P = 0.65) in the emergency endoscopy layer and in the secondary prophylaxis layer, respectively. The median length of hospital stay after endoscopy was 8 days vs. 9 days (P = 0.004) and 7 days vs. 6 days (P = 0.47), in each layer respectively. There was no significant difference in the adverse reactions of endoscopic treatment. EVL treatment (OR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.05-13.96; P = 0.04) and discontinuation of NSBB (non-selective beta-blocker) use after discharge (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.20-10.67; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopy in the emergency endoscopy layer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined therapy is comparable with ligation therapy in the short-term efficacy and safety of in cirrhosis patients with secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding while it is superior to EVL alone in cirrhosis in the emergency endoscopy treatment as it could reduce the early rebleeding rate and shorten the length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic mesh removal for chronic pain: a single-center experience with 11 years of practice. 腹腔镜网片切除术治疗慢性疼痛后腹股沟疝复发:单中心 11 年的实践经验。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11354-0
A M Chaoui, J P Rops, W A van Dijk, M J A Loos, M R M Scheltinga, W A R Zwaans, G D Slooter

Introduction: Up to 12% of patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair may develop chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), possibly explained by the presence of mesh. Recent studies reported that laparoscopic mesh removal is feasible and safe. However, the risk of a hernia recurrence is unknown. This observational study describes the rate of hernia recurrence and evolution in pain score following laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP after preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Prospectively collected questionnaires and operative notes of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP in our center of expertise between November 2011 and July 2022 were studied. Pain scores were quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). The presence of a hernia recurrence was based on patient history and clinical findings.

Results: A total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, and data of 83 patients (93% response rate) were available for analysis. Median decrease in pain score (NRS) after mesh removal was 4 (range + 2 to - 9). After a median 4.3 years follow up period, a hernia recurrence was present in 18 patients (21.7%). Of these, eight were symptomatic requiring correction using a Lichtenstein repair with a favorable outcome whereas a wait-and-see approach was successfully followed in the remaining 10 patients.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP following preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair resulted in an inguinal hernia recurrence in one of five patients requiring remedial surgery in one in ten patients. This knowledge may inform the preoperative counseling process.

导言:在接受微创腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,多达 12% 的患者可能会出现术后腹股沟慢性疼痛 (CPIP),这可能是由于网片的存在造成的。最近的研究表明,腹腔镜网片切除术是可行且安全的。然而,疝气复发的风险尚不清楚。这项观察性研究描述了腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后,因 CPIP 而进行腹腔镜网片摘除术后的疝气复发率和疼痛评分变化情况:研究对象为 2011 年 11 月至 2022 年 7 月期间在本专业中心接受腹腔镜网片摘除术治疗 CPIP 的连续患者,并对其进行了前瞻性问卷调查和手术记录。疼痛评分采用数字疼痛评分量表(NRS,0-10)进行量化。疝气复发与否取决于患者的病史和临床表现:共有 89 名患者接受了腹腔镜网片切除术,其中 83 名患者(应答率 93%)的数据可供分析。取出网片后,疼痛评分(NRS)的中位数下降了4分(范围为+2至-9)。经过中位 4.3 年的随访,有 18 名患者(21.7%)的疝气复发。结论:腹腔镜疝气网片摘除术是治疗疝气的最佳方法:结论:腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后进行腹腔镜网片摘除术治疗 CPIP,结果有五分之一的患者腹股沟疝复发,十分之一的患者需要进行补救手术。这一知识可为术前咨询过程提供参考。
{"title":"Inguinal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic mesh removal for chronic pain: a single-center experience with 11 years of practice.","authors":"A M Chaoui, J P Rops, W A van Dijk, M J A Loos, M R M Scheltinga, W A R Zwaans, G D Slooter","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11354-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11354-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Up to 12% of patients undergoing minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair may develop chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP), possibly explained by the presence of mesh. Recent studies reported that laparoscopic mesh removal is feasible and safe. However, the risk of a hernia recurrence is unknown. This observational study describes the rate of hernia recurrence and evolution in pain score following laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP after preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected questionnaires and operative notes of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP in our center of expertise between November 2011 and July 2022 were studied. Pain scores were quantified using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10). The presence of a hernia recurrence was based on patient history and clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients underwent laparoscopic mesh removal, and data of 83 patients (93% response rate) were available for analysis. Median decrease in pain score (NRS) after mesh removal was 4 (range + 2 to - 9). After a median 4.3 years follow up period, a hernia recurrence was present in 18 patients (21.7%). Of these, eight were symptomatic requiring correction using a Lichtenstein repair with a favorable outcome whereas a wait-and-see approach was successfully followed in the remaining 10 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP following preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair resulted in an inguinal hernia recurrence in one of five patients requiring remedial surgery in one in ten patients. This knowledge may inform the preoperative counseling process.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Three-year follow-up outcomes of postoperative quality of life from a randomized controlled trial comparing multi-port versus single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. 对比多孔口与单孔口腹腔镜远端胃切除术的随机对照试验对术后生活质量的三年随访结果。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11213-y
Kohei Fujita, Takeshi Omori, Hisashi Hara, Naoki Shinno, Masayoshi Yasui, Hiroshi Wada, Hirofumi Akita, Masayuki Ohue, Hiroshi Miyata, Shuji Takiguchi

Background: Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has become widely used; minimally invasive surgery has become the mainstream of treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare long-term quality of life (QoL) and weight loss rates in patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (SLG) or multi-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (MLG) for gastric cancer.

Methods: This single-center RCT compared MLG and SLG in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer, all of which underwent distal gastrectomy between April 2016 and September 2018. A total of 101 patients were evaluated for eligibility; all were randomized into either the SLG group (n = 50) or MLG group (n = 51). Blood tests, weight measurements, and postoperative questionnaires (DAUGS20, EORTC QLQ-C30, PGSAS-45) were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery to compare the QoL.

Results: At six months postoperatively, there was a higher trend toward lower weight loss in the SLG group compared with the MLG group. At 1, 3, 6, and 36 months postoperatively, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly lower in the SLG group than that in the MLG group. The QoL, as measured using the postoperative questionnaires, was generally comparable. However, some favorable results, such as fewer diarrheas, were achieved.

Conclusions: SLG was partially superior to MLG in terms of long-term QoL, in addition to assurance of esthetics and reduced pain. In addition, systemic inflammatory markers and weight loss rates were lower, suggesting a potential long-term benefit. SLG may be an option for stage I gastric cancer surgery. Further follow-up and multicenter studies should be considered.

背景:腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌已得到广泛应用;微创手术已成为治疗的主流。这项随机对照试验(RCT)旨在比较单孔腹腔镜胃切除术(SLG)和多孔腹腔镜胃切除术(MLG)胃癌患者的长期生活质量(QoL)和体重下降率:这项单中心 RCT 比较了 MLG 和 SLG 在临床 I 期胃癌患者中的应用,所有患者均在 2016 年 4 月至 2018 年 9 月期间接受了远端胃切除术。共有 101 名患者接受了资格评估;所有患者均被随机分为 SLG 组(n = 50)或 MLG 组(n = 51)。在术后3、6、12和36个月进行血液检查、体重测量和术后问卷调查(DAUGS20、EORTC QLQ-C30、PGSAS-45),以比较QoL:术后 6 个月时,SLG 组的体重下降趋势高于 MLG 组。术后 1、3、6 和 36 个月时,SLG 组的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率明显低于 MLG 组。通过术后调查问卷测量的 QoL 大致相当。结论:SLG 在一定程度上优于 MLG:除了保证美观和减少疼痛外,SLG 在长期生活质量方面部分优于 MLG。此外,全身炎症指标和体重减轻率也较低,这表明SLG具有潜在的长期益处。SLG可能是I期胃癌手术的一种选择。应考虑进一步的随访和多中心研究。
{"title":"Three-year follow-up outcomes of postoperative quality of life from a randomized controlled trial comparing multi-port versus single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.","authors":"Kohei Fujita, Takeshi Omori, Hisashi Hara, Naoki Shinno, Masayoshi Yasui, Hiroshi Wada, Hirofumi Akita, Masayuki Ohue, Hiroshi Miyata, Shuji Takiguchi","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11213-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11213-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has become widely used; minimally invasive surgery has become the mainstream of treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare long-term quality of life (QoL) and weight loss rates in patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (SLG) or multi-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (MLG) for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center RCT compared MLG and SLG in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer, all of which underwent distal gastrectomy between April 2016 and September 2018. A total of 101 patients were evaluated for eligibility; all were randomized into either the SLG group (n = 50) or MLG group (n = 51). Blood tests, weight measurements, and postoperative questionnaires (DAUGS20, EORTC QLQ-C30, PGSAS-45) were performed at 3, 6, 12, and 36 months after surgery to compare the QoL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At six months postoperatively, there was a higher trend toward lower weight loss in the SLG group compared with the MLG group. At 1, 3, 6, and 36 months postoperatively, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was significantly lower in the SLG group than that in the MLG group. The QoL, as measured using the postoperative questionnaires, was generally comparable. However, some favorable results, such as fewer diarrheas, were achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SLG was partially superior to MLG in terms of long-term QoL, in addition to assurance of esthetics and reduced pain. In addition, systemic inflammatory markers and weight loss rates were lower, suggesting a potential long-term benefit. SLG may be an option for stage I gastric cancer surgery. Further follow-up and multicenter studies should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correlation of preoperative CT features with intra- and postoperative parameters of endoscopic resection in patients with gastric submucosal tumor (1~3 cm). 胃粘膜下肿瘤(1~3 厘米)患者术前 CT 特征与内镜切除术中和术后参数的相关性。
IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11349-x
Yuxiang Chen, Mo Chen, Zhu Wang, Junchao Wu, Jinlin Yang, Li Yang, Kai Deng

Objectives: Endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) possesses minimal trauma, expedited recovery, and reduced costs. Nonetheless, intraoperative challenges, including imprecise surgical risk assessment, prevail. Hence, we investigated the correlation between preoperative CT observation features and perioperative parameters for predicting outcomes in SMT patients.

Methods: Subjects diagnosed with SMT and undergoing endoscopic surgery conducted at West China Hospital's Endoscopy Center from September 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively selected. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computer tomography (CT) were utilized for evaluating SMT. The study assessed the correlation between preoperative CT findings and perioperative parameters.

Results: Increased lesion size on contrast-enhanced CT correlates with increased operative duration, hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use. Of utmost significance, we observed a significantly higher intraoperative perforation rate for patients with tumor outgrowth compared to those with lesion involvement of the lumen (96.88% vs 29.11%, P < 0.001). These patients also demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative blood stream infections (P = 0.012), necessitating higher antibiotic grade (P = 0.048), along with prolonged gastrostomy tube retention (P = 0.001) and hospitalization (P = 0.018). In addition, CT provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of tumor size (P = 0.037) and growth pattern (P = 0.026) than EUS.

Conclusion: CT assessment of tumor size closer to reality than EUS. Importantly, these features can assist in pinpointing lesions with elevated surgical complexity and high risk of complications, leading to improved preoperative preparation, thereby increasing anticipation of surgical risks and reducing incidence of complications.

目的:内镜下胃黏膜下肿瘤(SMT)切除术具有创伤小、恢复快、费用低等优点。然而,术中面临的挑战包括手术风险评估不精确。因此,我们研究了术前 CT 观察特征与围手术期参数之间的相关性,以预测 SMT 患者的预后:回顾性选取2019年9月至2023年10月在华西医院内镜中心确诊为SMT并接受内镜手术的受试者。采用内镜超声(EUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估SMT。研究评估了术前 CT 结果与围手术期参数之间的相关性:结果:造影剂增强 CT 显示的病灶增大与手术时间、住院时间和术后抗生素使用量的增加相关。最重要的是,我们观察到,与病灶累及管腔的患者相比,肿瘤外长的患者术中穿孔率明显更高(96.88% vs 29.11%,P 结论:CT 评估肿瘤大小更接近实际情况:CT 对肿瘤大小的评估比 EUS 更接近实际情况。重要的是,这些特征可帮助确定手术复杂性高、并发症风险高的病灶,从而改善术前准备,提高手术风险预见性,降低并发症发生率。
{"title":"Correlation of preoperative CT features with intra- and postoperative parameters of endoscopic resection in patients with gastric submucosal tumor (1~3 cm).","authors":"Yuxiang Chen, Mo Chen, Zhu Wang, Junchao Wu, Jinlin Yang, Li Yang, Kai Deng","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11349-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11349-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) possesses minimal trauma, expedited recovery, and reduced costs. Nonetheless, intraoperative challenges, including imprecise surgical risk assessment, prevail. Hence, we investigated the correlation between preoperative CT observation features and perioperative parameters for predicting outcomes in SMT patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects diagnosed with SMT and undergoing endoscopic surgery conducted at West China Hospital's Endoscopy Center from September 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively selected. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computer tomography (CT) were utilized for evaluating SMT. The study assessed the correlation between preoperative CT findings and perioperative parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased lesion size on contrast-enhanced CT correlates with increased operative duration, hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use. Of utmost significance, we observed a significantly higher intraoperative perforation rate for patients with tumor outgrowth compared to those with lesion involvement of the lumen (96.88% vs 29.11%, P < 0.001). These patients also demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative blood stream infections (P = 0.012), necessitating higher antibiotic grade (P = 0.048), along with prolonged gastrostomy tube retention (P = 0.001) and hospitalization (P = 0.018). In addition, CT provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of tumor size (P = 0.037) and growth pattern (P = 0.026) than EUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT assessment of tumor size closer to reality than EUS. Importantly, these features can assist in pinpointing lesions with elevated surgical complexity and high risk of complications, leading to improved preoperative preparation, thereby increasing anticipation of surgical risks and reducing incidence of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1