Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques最新文献

Background: One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most common metabolic/bariatric procedure worldwide. A point for discussion regarding OAGB is acid and non-acid reflux in mid- and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate reflux and esophagus motility by comparing pre- and postoperative results of 24-h pH-metry, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and gastroscopy.

Setting: Cross-sectional study and university hospital based.

Methods: This study includes primary OAGB patients operated at the Medical University of Vienna before 31st December 2022. After a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.9 years, the preoperative examinations were repeated. Additionally, history of weight, remission of obesity-related complications (ORC), and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated.

Results: A total of 50 patients were included in this study and went through all examinations. Preoperative weight was 125.5 ± 21.0 kg with a BMI of 44.6 ± 5.4 kg/m² and total weight loss after 4.1 ± 2.9 years was 37.1 ± 8.1%. Remission of ORC and QOL outcomes was successful in all categories. Gastroscopy showed anastomositis, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and bile in the pouch in 38.0%, 34.0%, 6.0%, and 48.0%, respectively. In HRM, the postoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 29.6 ± 15.1 mmHg (unchanged to preoperative). The total number of refluxes was equal to preoperative, whereas decreased acid refluxes were replaced by increasing non-acid refluxes. Impedance-24-h pH-metry showed that acid exposure time of the esophagus and DeMeester score decreased significantly to 1.6 ± 1.4% (p = 0.001) and 10.3 ± 9.6 (p = 0.046).

Conclusion: This study has shown decreased rates of acid reflux and increased rates of non-acid reflux after a mid-term outcome of primary OAGB patients. Gastroscopy showed significant signs of chronic reflux exposure of the anastomosis, the pouch, and the distal esophagus, even in asymptomatic patients. General follow-up visits in patients after OAGB should be considered.

Background: Risky surgical manipulations that can cause postoperative intra-abdominal infections (IAICs) have not been identified in gastric cancer surgery. We conducted a study to evaluate surgical videos and identify risky surgical maneuvers.

Methods: This was a multicenter case-control study. Patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. Patients who developed IAICs after surgery were defined as cases, and a control group adjusted for patient background characteristics was selected using propensity score matching. Using an 11-item rating scale specific to gastric cancer surgery developed by experts, two raters blinded to the outcome scored the unedited surgical videos on a five-point scale. The mean difference in the scores for each item was evaluated to identify risky manipulations. We also evaluated the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) as a general evaluation instrument.

Results: After excluding patients for whom a video evaluation was not possible, 121 cases and 114 controls were included in this analysis. Risky surgical maneuvers strongly associated with the occurrence of IAICs were identified, including accidental pancreatic injury during peri-pancreatic lymph node dissection, bleeding from the pancreas, improper hemostatic manipulation, and blunt compression of the pancreas. The reconstructive manipulations were not at risk, and all OSATS items were also significantly better in the control group than in the case group.

Conclusion: We identified the risk of surgical manipulation associated with postoperative complications in this case-control study, with strict adjustment for patient risk factors.

Introduction: In North America, the majority of hepatectomies are still performed in traditional open fashion. Robotic hepatectomy may facilitate a minimally invasive approach to liver resection.

Objectives: We report a single-center experience with the wide adaptation of robotic hepatectomy over a 5-year period.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all hepatectomies (n = 334) was performed at our institution from January 2018 to January 2023. This included 164 open, 18 laparoscopic, and 152 robotic hepatectomies. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match open (n = 100) to robotic (n = 100) hepatectomy cases by demographics and case complexity. Standard statistics were used to compare 90-day outcomes, including textbook outcome after liver surgery (TOLS), and cost. CUSUM curves were used to determine the learning curve for major hepatectomy.

Results: During the study period, laparoscopic hepatectomy was phased out and robotic hepatectomy became the predominant approach. The median IWATE score for the robotic cases was 8 ± 2 and 39% were major hepatectomies. The learning curve for robotic right hepatectomy was 15 cases. When PSM cases were compared, while operative time was longer, blood loss and transfusion, intraoperative incidents, overall and major morbidity, bile leaks, post-hepatectomy liver failure, hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen, reoperation, ICU utilization, and length of stay were significantly lower in the robotic group. There was no difference in positive margins or 90-day mortality. Robotic hepatectomy was associated with significantly higher TOLS compared to open hepatectomy (85% versus 64%, p < 0.001) and on multivariate analysis, only a robotic hepatectomy approach was independently associated with achieving TOLS (OR 3.3, (1.62-6.67) 95% CI)). The lower ICU utilization and length of stay accounted for a significantly lower overall hospital cost for robotic compared to open hepatectomy despite a higher operating room cost.

Conclusion: We describe the successful implementation of robotic hepatectomy at our institution with favorable outcomes and cost.

Background: Endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) has been used to close gastrointestinal defects following endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD), but its closure strength needs further evaluation. This exploratory animal study aimed to compare the closure strength of EHS and titanium clips in ex vivo porcine gastric ESD defect models.

Methods: Fifteen porcine stomachs were used to create ESD defect models, each featuring a 2-3-cm defect in the gastric body and another in the antrum. Defects were randomly assigned to three groups: EHS group (Group A), dense clipping group (Group B), and loose clipping group (Group C). Under endoscopy, Group A defects were sutured with 4 stitches, Group B with 7 clips, and Group C with 4 clips. The primary outcome measures were overall closure strength and closure strength per unit length, measured with a digital spring scale. Differences among groups were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Result: All 30 defects were successfully closed endoscopically. Group A achieved significantly higher overall closure strength [1.06 kg (0.96 kg, 1.22 kg)] compared to Group B [0.27 kg (0.19 kg, 0.31 kg), P = 0.026] and Group C [0.11 kg (0.09 kg, 0.15 kg), P < 0.001]. For the closure strength per unit length, Group A [0.33 kg (0.27 kg, 0.35 kg)] also outperformed Group B [0.08 kg (0.06 kg, 0.10 kg), P = 0.023] and Group C [0.04 kg (0.03 kg, 0.04 kg), P < 0.001].

Conclusion: EHS can provide superior closure strength for ex vivo gastric ESD defects compared to simple titanium clips.

Background: Several retrospective studies suggest that adding a non-adjustable silicone ring to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) results in more weight loss and prevents weight regain in the long term. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (B-RYGB) on weight loss outcomes in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Methods: In this single center RCT, 130 patients were divided into two groups: a standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-RYGB) or a B-RYGB using a Minimizer® ring. Subsequently, weight loss, morbidity, reduction of obesity-associated medical conditions, quality of life (QoL), and complication rates were measured during a follow-up period of five years. A two-sided p < 0.05 (with 95% confidence interval) indicated statistical significance.

Results: After five years, mean percentage total body weight loss (%TBWL) was 30.5% in the S-RYGB versus 31.8% in the B-RYGB group (p > 0.05). The follow-up percentage was 81%. Overall, no significant differences in complication rates, resolution of obesity-associated medical conditions, and QoL were found between the two groups. In the B-RYGB group, 8 (12%) silicone rings were removed due to symptoms of dysphagia.

Conclusion: B-RYGB is a safe procedure showing similar comorbidity when compared to a S-RYGB. However, B-RYGB led to a higher rate of postoperative dysphagia which poses a risk of ring removal over time. The results from this RCT do not support the hypothesis that implantation of a non-adjustable silicone ring improves long-term weight loss outcomes.

Background: Multiple surgical virtual reality (VR) simulators are currently available; however, there is lack of comparison between performance after practice on these simulators compared to bench top models. Utilizing the Intuitive Data recorder (IDR) and Objective performance indicators (OPI), we aim to objectively assess robotic surgical skills using a dry lab model. We hypothesize that practicing surgical skills will improve OPIs and that those who practice on the dry lab model will have a greater improvement in their OPIs compared to those who practice with Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery (FRS) SimNow VR.

Methods: The IDR was used to record kinematics as each participant went through five basic surgery tasks on a dry lab benchtop model to record baseline performance. Participants were then randomized to practice on the dry lab model or the corresponding SimNow Virtual reality (VR) tasks. The participants repeated the tasks again on the benchtop model. Statistical analysis was performed using paired samples t tests, independent samples t tests, and ANOVA tests.

Results: Twenty-seven surgeons participated in our study ranging from interns to attendings. Randomization to VR vs benchtop practice resulted in 11 and 13 participants in each group. For the rollercoaster, backhand suturing, railroad, and knot tying tasks, a significant improvement in kinematic profiles was observed. Bimanual dexterity, angular motion, and smoothness metrics improved most consistently across the tasks after practice. Kinematic profiles between those practicing on VR versus benchtop had no significant differences.

Conclusions: This study shows that OPIs can be used to benchmark surgical trainees. VR appears to be non-inferior to dry lab model for practice for trainees. We identified patterns in OPI improvement that can be tailored to specific skills depending on the trainees needs. Our study is the first step in developing a standardized training and assessment tool to assess competency in robotic surgery training.

Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the risk of unforeseen nodal upstaging (pN+) after pulmonary segmentectomy without intraoperative frozen section.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis for consecutive patients who underwent segmentectomy for clinical stage IA1-2 non-small cell lung cancer (cIA1-2 NSCLC) in three centers between January 2017 and December 2022. A backward stepwise logistic regression analysis for variables with P < 0.1 in univariable analysis was performed to predict pN+. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test evaluated the discrepancy for overall (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS).

Results: Among 478 patients included in the final analysis, 19 (4.0%) had pN+, including 10 (2.1%) pN1, 6 (1.3%) pN2, and 3 (0.6%) pN1+2. With a median follow-up of 23.5 months (interquartile range 12.6-39.0), patients with pN+ had poorer OS compared to those with pN0 (3-year OS: 70.2% vs. 89.7%, P = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in RFS and recurrence. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of tumor in positron emission tomography scan ≥ 4.5 (versus < 4.5) was the only independent factor for pN + (odds ratio 3.5). Patients with a SUVmax ≥ 4.5 had 7.3% pN+, which was associated with poorer OS and similar RFS and recurrence compared to pN0. In contrast, those with a SUVmax < 4.5 had 2.2% pN+, which had comparable recurrence and survival to pN0.

Conclusion: Unforeseen nodal upstaging in segmentectomy for cIA1-2 NSCLC is low. Frozen section of lymph nodes may be necessary for lesions with high metabolic activity.

Background: We investigated the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Methods: This study included 247 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent NAC followed by gastrectomy between 2007 and 2017 at one of six institutions. The patients were divided into the open gastrectomy (OG) and LG groups. The short- and long-term outcomes in both groups were investigated after propensity score matching.

Results: After propensity score matching, 72 pairs of patients were selected. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different after matching. Compared with the OG group, the LG group had a significantly longer operative time (360 vs. 305 min, P = 0.002) and less intraoperative blood loss (271 vs. 652 mL, P < 0.001). The LG group had more harvested lymph nodes than the OG group (57.4 vs. 45.1, P < 0.001). The frequency of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications was not significantly different (26% vs. 22%, P = 0.698). The interval between surgery and postoperative chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the LG group (48.7 vs. 68.6 days, P = 0.048). The 5-year overall survival rates in the OG and LG groups were 54.4% and 53.5%, respectively. The overall survival was similar between the two groups (P = 0.773). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the type of recurrence, including lymph node, hematogenous, and peritoneal recurrences (P = 1.000, P = 1.000, and P = 0.686, respectively).

Conclusions: Based on both short- and long-term results, LG is a potential therapeutic option for patients with gastric cancer who undergo NAC.

Background: Visceral obesity has been increasingly recognized as a potential risk factor for surgical complications in gastric cancer surgery, yet its impact on lymphadenectomy during laparoscopic gastrectomy remains undefined. This study aimed to investigate the influence of visceral fat area (VFA) on intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) during lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Methods: A post hoc analysis was performed using data from two previous prospective studies ([NCT02327481] and [NCT01609309]). The patients were divided into high and low VFA groups based on preoperative computed tomography images at the umbilical level. All iAEs were reviewed from the surgical videos and graded using ClassIntra. The factors influencing iAEs were identified, and predictive models for iAEs were constructed.

Results: This study included 490 patients, with 244 and 246 patients in the high and low VFA groups, respectively. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated a positive linear association between VFA and iAEs. Compared with the low VFA group, the high VFA group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of iAEs (29% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), primarily in the infrapyloric (9.0% vs. 2.0%) and suprapancreatic (23.4% vs. 9.3%) regions and higher rates of ClassIntra I-III. Multivariate logistic regression identified high VFA as an independent risk factor for iAEs (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 - 3.83). Based on the VFA, nomograms were developed to predict iAEs (training area under the curve [AUC] 0.722, validation AUC 0.730). Meanwhile, a web-based calculator was developed to facilitate clinical application.

Conclusions: High preoperative VFA is independently correlated with iAEs after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Nomograms based on VFA showed potential in predicting iAEs, helping identify high-risk patients early and facilitating tailored perioperative management.

Background: Although open esophagectomies (OE) have traditionally been favored, minimally invasive approaches are increasingly utilized and associated with improved outcomes. We investigated the adoption rates of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with OE. Utilization rates by surgical approach, post-operative outcomes, and overall survival were analyzed.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent OE, MIE, and RAMIE for esophageal cancer from 2010 to 2019. Adoption rates of RAMIE, MIE and OE were determined for all patients. Patients with primary cervical esophageal cancer, stage 4 disease, unknown staging, or missing follow-up data were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression models compared overall survival based on surgical approach.

Results: A total of 17,765 patients underwent an esophagectomy for stage I, II, and III disease (OE: n = 10,039; MIE: n = 5388; RAMIE: n = 2338). Between 2010 and 2019, OE decreased by 52%, while MIE and RAMIE increased by 49% and 704%, respectively. The overall conversion rate of MIE and RAMIE to OE decreased significantly over the study time period. On multivariable analysis, the odds of 30-day and 90-day mortality was lower for MIE (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) and trended towards lower for RAMIE when compared to OE, though was not a statistically significant difference. Further, the overall 5-year survival was higher in the MIE and RAMIE cohort compared to the OE cohort. Like short-term survival, patients who underwent MIE had a significantly lower mortality (p < 0.001) while those who underwent RAMIE trended towards lower mortality.

Conclusion: This contemporary review of a national cohort demonstrates the rapid adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques, without compromise in short-term or long-term outcomes.