Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques最新文献

Background: The use of robotic or laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder cancer (GBC) is increasing, with reported advantages over conventional open surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and postoperative overall survival (OS) associated with robotic radical resection (RRR) and laparoscopic radical resection (LRR) for GBC.

Method: A total of 109 patients with GBC who underwent radical resection with the same surgical team between January 2015 and December 2023 were enrolled, with 21 patients in the RRR group and 88 cases in the LRR group. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) algorithm was used to compare the surgical outcomes and postoperative prognosis between the RRR and LRR groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of postoperative overall survival (OS) and complications of Clavien-Dindo (C-D) Grades III-IV.

Results: The median follow-up time was 46 (inter-quartile range, IQR 29-70) months for the LRR group and 16 (IQR 12-34) months for the RRR group. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of the RRR and LRR groups were generally well balanced, with 21 patients in each group. RRR was associated with significantly decreased intraoperative bleeding [100.00 (50.00, 200.00) mL vs 200.00 (100.00, 300.00) mL] and higher number of lymph nodes (LNs) yield [12.00 (9.00, 15.50) vs 8.00 (6.00, 12.00)]. The two groups showed comparable outcomes in terms of the incidence of biliary reconstruction, the range of liver resection, the length of operation, the incidence of postoperative morbidity, the incidence of C-D Grades III-IV complications, number of the days of drainage tubes indwelling and postoperative hospital stay, and mortality by postoperative days 30 and 90. After PSM, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 78, 70, and 37%, respectively, in the RRR group, and 71, 59, and 48%, respectively, in the LRR group (P = 0.593). Multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative TB level ≥ 72 µmol/L and biliary reconstruction were found to be the independent risk factors of C-D Grades III-IV complications. T3 stage was identified to be the risk factor for postoperative OS.

Conclusion: Compared with LRR, RRR showed comparable perioperative outcomes in terms of length of operation, and postoperative complications, recovery, and OS. In our case series, RRR of GBC can be accomplished safely and tends to show less intraoperative bleeding and higher LNs yield.

Background: Open parastomal hernia repairs (OPHR) are complex with high recurrence rates and no clear optimal technique. This report summarizes long-term OPHR outcomes at a high-volume hernia center.

Methods: OPHRs were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Recurrence and wound complication rates were compared across operative techniques using standard statistical analysis.

Results: Of 97 OPHR patients, mean age was 61.9 ± 12.6 years, 56.7% were female, 24.7% were diabetic, and average BMI was 31.3 ± 6.5 kg/m². Mean defect size was 125.3 ± 130.0cm² and 41.2% were recurrent. Stomas included colostomies (56.7%), ileostomies (30.9%), and urostomies (12.4%). Patients underwent concurrent ventral hernia repair (56.7%), panniculectomy (22.7%), and component separation (30.9%). Patients either had their stoma reversed (13.4%), resited (25.8%), or repaired in situ (60.8%) with suture (11.9%) or mesh (88.1%) in a Sugarbaker (65.4%), keyhole (19.2%), or onlay (15.4%) configuration. Over a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 35.9 months, wound complications occurred in 18.6% and recurrences in 20.6%. There were no significant differences in recurrence by ostomy type. Recurrence rates were highest after in situ suture repair (42.9%), followed by resiting with mesh (34.8%), in situ with mesh (17.3%), and reversal (0.0%)(p = 0.042). When stomas were resited, prophylactic mesh compared to no mesh did not significantly impact recurrence (28.6%vs.50.0%;p = 0.570). Recurrence rates for in situ repairs were not statistically different by mesh technique (onlay 25.0%, Sugarbaker 17.7%, keyhole 10.0%;p = 0.751), but differed by location(retrorectus 50.0%, intraperitoneal 36.4%, onlay 25.0%, preperitoneal 6.5%;p = 0.035). Multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any independent predictors of recurrence or wound complications.

Conclusion: This study represents the largest series to date describing long-term OPHR outcomes with a variety of techniques. Recurrence was greatest after in situ primary repair. There were no recurrences after stoma reversal. After ostomy resiting, all recurrences occurred at the new stoma site, independent of prophylactic mesh use. When the stoma was repaired in situ, preperitoneal mesh placement had the lowest recurrence. Optimal technique for OPHR remains unclear, but these results may inform preoperative discussions and surgical planning.

Background: Various techniques have been used to prevent smudge on a laparoscope when inserting through trocars; however, there has been no standardized method. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different cleaning techniques with or without using dedicated devices, and to evaluate the features of cleaning devices.

Methods: The smudge was created in the standard 12-mm and 5-mm ports using pseudo-blood, and port cleaning was attempted using 5 different methods: (1) a surgical gauze + surgical forceps, (2) a surgical gauze + laparoscopic forceps, (3) a small laparoscopic gauze + laparoscopic forceps, (4) a cylinder-type cleaner (Endo Wiper; Osaki Medical), and (5) a swab-type cleaner (Port Cleaner; Hakuzo Medical). The "port cleaning rate" was calculated by measuring the absorbance of remained pseudo-blood after single cleaning procedure using UV spectrophotometry. In addition, the port cleaning rate was compared between two dedicated devices after multiple (5 times) cleaning procedures.

Results: The two dedicated devices had a statistically higher cleaning rate for 12-mm port than the methods using surgical gauze (p < 0.05). Regarding the 5-mm port, a swab-type cleaner showed the highest cleaning rate than the gauze method and a cylinder-type cleaner (p < 0.05). After multiple cleaning procedures for 12-mm port, cleaning rate of a swab-type cleaner decreased by an average of 5.4% (p = 0.044), but cleaning rate did not decrease for a cylinder-type cleaner. Regarding the 5-mm port, cleaning rate statistically decreased for both two dedicated devices (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Higher port cleaning rates were observed in techniques using dedicated devices. A swab-type cleaner had better port cleaning rate in single use, especially for the 5-mm port. A cylinder-type cleaner showed higher durability in cleaning 12-mm port. The features of these dedicated devices should be well understood, and cleaning methods should be selected according to the environment and surgical techniques.

Background: Ventral mesh rectopexy (laparoscopic and robotic) is a common and well established treatment of rectal prolapse. Although described as safe and effective, complications, especially mesh-associated ones are often mentioned. Additionally, there is no consensus regarding the mesh type and fixation method as well as the materials used for this purpose. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the total amount of complications and of those the mesh-associated ones.

Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register were screened for complications in general and in detail regarding the mesh(es) and a systematic review was performed.

Results: Following qualitative evaluation, 40 studies were identified for further investigation. Across 6269 patients, complications were found in 9.2% (622 patients). Mesh-related complications were described in 1.4% (88 patients) of which 64.8% were erosions, 11.4% fistulas and 13.6% mesh releases. The complication rate according to the different materials were low with 1% in biological and synthetic meshes and 1.8% in not further described or mixed mesh type. Non-absorbable material to fixate the mesh was most frequently used to fixate the mesh.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe operation with a low-complication rate, regardless of mesh type.