首页 > 最新文献

The Mental Health Clinician最新文献

英文 中文
Assessment of oral overlap with antipsychotic long-acting injectables initiated in an inpatient setting. 评估口服重叠与抗精神病长效注射剂开始在住院设置。
Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.06.147
Jennifer T Tran, Katie J Binger, Talia M Miles

Introduction: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are a promising solution to combating issues related to nonadherence to oral antipsychotics. Oral overlap is utilized when an LAI is initiated to achieve therapeutic concentrations. The place in therapy in which additional overlap is warranted is often mistaken, and providers may prescribe additional overlap based on the presentation of the patient or misunderstanding of appropriate overlap.

Methods: This retrospective chart review assesses patients who were initiated on an LAI while admitted to the acute inpatient psychiatric unit from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. The primary outcome assesses the appropriateness of oral overlap with LAIs. Secondary outcomes include adherence to oral overlap, discontinuation of an LAI within 4 months, and reason for discontinuation of LAI.

Results: A total of 62 patients were included: 40 (65%) had appropriate overlap, and 22 (35%) had inappropriate overlap. The most common LAI was paliperidone (n = 50, 81%). Patients were adherent to oral overlap in 67% (n = 6) of the appropriate overlap group and 85% (n = 17) of the inappropriate overlap group. Discontinuation of an LAI in 4 months occurred in 62.5% (n = 25) of the appropriate group and 40.9% (n = 9) of the inappropriate group. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes when comparing adherence to oral overlap (p = .26), discontinuation of LAI within 4 months (p = .62), and reason for discontinuation (p = .69).

Discussion: This study identified that a majority of patients had appropriate prescribing of oral antipsychotic overlap.

导言:长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物是解决口服抗精神病药物不依从问题的一个有希望的解决方案。当开始使用LAI以达到治疗浓度时,使用口服重叠。在治疗中需要额外重叠的地方往往是错误的,提供者可能会根据患者的表现或对适当重叠的误解而规定额外重叠。方法:本回顾性图表回顾评估了2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日在急性住院精神科住院期间开始使用LAI的患者。主要结果评估了与LAIs进行口腔重叠的适宜性。次要结局包括坚持口服重叠,在4个月内停止LAI,以及停止LAI的原因。结果:共纳入62例患者:适当重叠40例(65%),不适当重叠22例(35%)。最常见的LAI是帕利哌酮(n = 50, 81%)。适当重叠组中67% (n = 6)的患者坚持口腔重叠,不适当重叠组中85% (n = 17)的患者坚持口腔重叠。在适当组和不适当组中,分别有62.5% (n = 25)和40.9% (n = 9)在4个月内停止使用LAI。当比较口服重叠治疗的依从性(p = 0.26)、4个月内LAI的停药(p = 0.62)和停药原因(p = 0.69)时,次要结局无显著差异。讨论:本研究确定大多数患者有适当的口服抗精神病药物处方重叠。
{"title":"Assessment of oral overlap with antipsychotic long-acting injectables initiated in an inpatient setting.","authors":"Jennifer T Tran,&nbsp;Katie J Binger,&nbsp;Talia M Miles","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.06.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.06.147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are a promising solution to combating issues related to nonadherence to oral antipsychotics. Oral overlap is utilized when an LAI is initiated to achieve therapeutic concentrations. The place in therapy in which additional overlap is warranted is often mistaken, and providers may prescribe additional overlap based on the presentation of the patient or misunderstanding of appropriate overlap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review assesses patients who were initiated on an LAI while admitted to the acute inpatient psychiatric unit from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. The primary outcome assesses the appropriateness of oral overlap with LAIs. Secondary outcomes include adherence to oral overlap, discontinuation of an LAI within 4 months, and reason for discontinuation of LAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 patients were included: 40 (65%) had appropriate overlap, and 22 (35%) had inappropriate overlap. The most common LAI was paliperidone (<i>n</i> = 50, 81%). Patients were adherent to oral overlap in 67% (<i>n</i> = 6) of the appropriate overlap group and 85% (<i>n</i> = 17) of the inappropriate overlap group. Discontinuation of an LAI in 4 months occurred in 62.5% (<i>n</i> = 25) of the appropriate group and 40.9% (<i>n</i> = 9) of the inappropriate group. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes when comparing adherence to oral overlap (<i>p</i> = .26), discontinuation of LAI within 4 months (<i>p</i> = .62), and reason for discontinuation (<i>p</i> = .69).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study identified that a majority of patients had appropriate prescribing of oral antipsychotic overlap.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 3","pages":"147-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/8e/i2168-9709-13-3-147.PMC10337880.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9820456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medications for opioid use disorder in professional recovery programs in the United States: Policies and recommendation patterns. 美国专业康复项目中阿片类药物使用障碍的药物治疗:政策和推荐模式
Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.06.163
Morgan L Murchison, Lindsey J Loera, Lucas G Hill
The purpose of this study was to describe current policies and clinician recommendation patterns for MOUD in PRPs. A survey was developed and pretested during 2 live interviews with PRP directors in Texas. The final survey focused on collecting data for each form of MOUD approved by the FDA: methadone (MTD), buprenorphine (BUP), and naltrexone (NTX). Data were collected in relation to participants in 2 scenarios: (1) not practicing, and (2) returning to practice. The survey was constructed and disseminated using online software (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah). Email addresses and phone numbers were compiled for PRPs serving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses in all 50 US states. If a PRP could not be identified, the state board was listed instead. Administration of PRPs varies between states, with some serving multiple health professions, so the survey allowed respondents to select multiple professions served with pertinent survey items repeated to obtain distinct responses for each profession. A unique survey link was emailed to each program on September 12, 2022, and a follow-up call was conducted within 1 week to confirm receipt and encourage completion. Two reminder emails were sent to noncompleters, and the survey closed on October 4, 2022. Respondents could enter a raffle for one of five $50 gift cards. This study was deemed exempt by The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board.
{"title":"Medications for opioid use disorder in professional recovery programs in the United States: Policies and recommendation patterns.","authors":"Morgan L Murchison,&nbsp;Lindsey J Loera,&nbsp;Lucas G Hill","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.06.163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.06.163","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to describe current policies and clinician recommendation patterns for MOUD in PRPs. A survey was developed and pretested during 2 live interviews with PRP directors in Texas. The final survey focused on collecting data for each form of MOUD approved by the FDA: methadone (MTD), buprenorphine (BUP), and naltrexone (NTX). Data were collected in relation to participants in 2 scenarios: (1) not practicing, and (2) returning to practice. The survey was constructed and disseminated using online software (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah). Email addresses and phone numbers were compiled for PRPs serving physicians, pharmacists, and nurses in all 50 US states. If a PRP could not be identified, the state board was listed instead. Administration of PRPs varies between states, with some serving multiple health professions, so the survey allowed respondents to select multiple professions served with pertinent survey items repeated to obtain distinct responses for each profession. A unique survey link was emailed to each program on September 12, 2022, and a follow-up call was conducted within 1 week to confirm receipt and encourage completion. Two reminder emails were sent to noncompleters, and the survey closed on October 4, 2022. Respondents could enter a raffle for one of five $50 gift cards. This study was deemed exempt by The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board.","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 3","pages":"163-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/44/i2168-9709-13-3-163.PMC10337878.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9825871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quetiapine and olanzapine misuse prevalence in a US general population sample. 美国普通人群样本中喹硫平和奥氮平滥用的流行情况。
Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.04.025
Kirk E Evoy, Shelby Humpert, Sorina Torrez, Haneen Hussein, Jordan R Covvey

Introduction: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are associated with misuse potential; however, there are limited data describing the prevalence and characteristics of this misuse. This study was conducted to identify and describe quetiapine and olanzapine misuse among US adults.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey questionnaire was conducted online using Qualtrics research panel aggregator service to identify a quota-based sample of respondents constructed to mimic the general US population aged 18 to 59 years, with regards to gender, geographic region, ethnicity, income, and education level. Misuse was defined as using quetiapine or olanzapine for treatment outside of medical recommendations, for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition, or obtaining without a prescription. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SGA misuse, incorporating relevant covariates.

Results: Among 1843 total respondents, 229 had a history of quetiapine or olanzapine use. Misuse prevalence was estimated to be 6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%). Although most respondents (∼70%) using quetiapine or olanzapine reported doing so to treat a diagnosed medical condition, those misusing them most commonly did so because prescribed medications failed to relieve their symptoms. Misuse was commonly reported (∼50%) concomitantly with opioids, benzodiazepines, or alcohol. Factors significantly associated with quetiapine or olanzapine misuse included employment (OR = 4.64), previous substance use disorder treatment (OR = 2.48), and having riskier attitudes toward medication misuse (OR = 1.23).

Discussion: Misuse of quetiapine and olanzapine, while fairly limited in prevalence, appears to be primarily associated with under-treatment of existing medical conditions.

第二代抗精神病药物(SGA)与滥用的可能性有关;然而,描述这种滥用的流行程度和特征的数据有限。本研究旨在识别和描述美国成年人对喹硫平和奥氮平的滥用。方法:使用Qualtrics研究小组聚合服务在线进行横断面调查问卷,以确定基于配额的受访者样本,以模拟美国18至59岁的一般人口,涉及性别,地理区域,种族,收入和教育水平。误用被定义为在医疗建议之外使用喹硫平或奥氮平进行治疗,原因不是诊断的医疗状况,或未经处方获得。使用逻辑回归来确定与SGA滥用相关的因素,并纳入相关协变量。结果:在1843名受访者中,229人有喹硫平或奥氮平的使用史。误用率估计为6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%)。虽然大多数使用喹硫平或奥氮平的应答者(约70%)报告说这样做是为了治疗诊断出的疾病,但那些滥用喹硫平或奥氮平的人最常见的原因是处方药未能缓解他们的症状。误用常与阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物或酒精同时发生(约50%)。与喹硫平或奥氮平滥用显著相关的因素包括就业(or = 4.64)、既往物质使用障碍治疗(or = 2.48)和对药物滥用有更危险的态度(or = 1.23)。讨论:喹硫平和奥氮平的滥用虽然流行程度相当有限,但似乎主要与现有疾病治疗不足有关。
{"title":"Quetiapine and olanzapine misuse prevalence in a US general population sample.","authors":"Kirk E Evoy,&nbsp;Shelby Humpert,&nbsp;Sorina Torrez,&nbsp;Haneen Hussein,&nbsp;Jordan R Covvey","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.04.025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.04.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) are associated with misuse potential; however, there are limited data describing the prevalence and characteristics of this misuse. This study was conducted to identify and describe quetiapine and olanzapine misuse among US adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey questionnaire was conducted online using Qualtrics research panel aggregator service to identify a quota-based sample of respondents constructed to mimic the general US population aged 18 to 59 years, with regards to gender, geographic region, ethnicity, income, and education level. Misuse was defined as using quetiapine or olanzapine for treatment outside of medical recommendations, for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition, or obtaining without a prescription. A logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SGA misuse, incorporating relevant covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1843 total respondents, 229 had a history of quetiapine or olanzapine use. Misuse prevalence was estimated to be 6.3% (95% CI: 5.2, 7.5%). Although most respondents (∼70%) using quetiapine or olanzapine reported doing so to treat a diagnosed medical condition, those misusing them most commonly did so because prescribed medications failed to relieve their symptoms. Misuse was commonly reported (∼50%) concomitantly with opioids, benzodiazepines, or alcohol. Factors significantly associated with quetiapine or olanzapine misuse included employment (OR = 4.64), previous substance use disorder treatment (OR = 2.48), and having riskier attitudes toward medication misuse (OR = 1.23).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Misuse of quetiapine and olanzapine, while fairly limited in prevalence, appears to be primarily associated with under-treatment of existing medical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 2","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/b3/i2168-9709-13-2-25.PMC10094996.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9321343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Online industry resources can help ensure continuity of care for patients on long-acting injectable antipsychotics while traveling or relocating. 在线行业资源可以帮助确保在旅行或搬迁时对服用长效注射抗精神病药物的患者的护理的连续性。
Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.04.049
Geoffrey W Brown, Terrance J Bellnier
{"title":"Online industry resources can help ensure continuity of care for patients on long-acting injectable antipsychotics while traveling or relocating.","authors":"Geoffrey W Brown,&nbsp;Terrance J Bellnier","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.04.049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.04.049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 2","pages":"49-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/b6/i2168-9709-13-2-49.PMC10094995.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9321342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychotropic stewardship: Advancing patient care. 精神药物管理:推进病人护理。
Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.04.036
Robert J Haight, Chelsea N Di Polito, Gregory H Payne, Jolene R Bostwick, April Fulbright, Jonathan F Lister, Andrew M Williams

Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists (BCPPs) practice in a variety of inpatient and outpatient health care settings as part of collaborative, multidisciplinary teams. The American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) has promoted the expansion of psychiatric pharmacy through the development of psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs). Based on the standards developed during the creation and expansion of antimicrobial stewardship programs, psychotropic stewardship promotes the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications. AAPP envisions every patient with a psychiatric diagnosis will have their medication treatment plan reviewed, optimized, and managed by a psychotropic stewardship team with a psychiatric pharmacist as a co-leader. Because of variations in practice site resources, patient populations, and provider collaboration, the creation and implementation of PSPs should be based on site-specific needs and opportunities. Initial patient identification could prioritize those prescribed multiple medications, high-risk psychotropics, or comorbid medical diagnoses. However, every patient prescribed a psychotropic medication should have the opportunity to work with a PSP. Incremental implementation may be required during the planning stages of stewardship teams. Use of clinical practice-related core outcomes will allow for the optimization of program resources, increased recognition, and improved patient outcomes. PSPs should be patient-focused and integrate patients' preferences and access to recommended treatment options. The eventual goal of PSP implementation is official recognition by key regulatory agencies as a standard of care for patients who receive a diagnosis of a psychiatric or substance use disorder.

委员会认证的精神科药剂师(BCPPs)实践在各种住院和门诊卫生保健设置作为合作的一部分,多学科的团队。美国精神病学药剂师协会(AAPP)通过发展精神药物管理计划(psp)促进了精神病学药学的扩展。基于在创建和扩展抗菌药物管理计划期间制定的标准,精神药物管理促进精神药物的安全和适当使用。AAPP设想,每一个被诊断为精神病的病人,他们的药物治疗计划都将由一个精神病药剂师作为共同领导的精神药物管理团队来审查、优化和管理。由于实践场所资源、患者群体和提供者协作的变化,psp的创建和实施应基于特定场所的需求和机会。最初的患者识别可以优先考虑那些处方的多种药物、高风险精神药物或合并症的医学诊断。然而,每个开了精神药物的病人都应该有机会和PSP一起工作。在管理团队的计划阶段可能需要增量实现。使用临床实践相关的核心结果将允许优化项目资源,提高认可度,并改善患者的结果。psp应以患者为中心,整合患者的偏好和获得推荐的治疗方案。PSP实施的最终目标是得到主要监管机构的正式认可,作为诊断为精神或物质使用障碍的患者的护理标准。
{"title":"Psychotropic stewardship: Advancing patient care.","authors":"Robert J Haight,&nbsp;Chelsea N Di Polito,&nbsp;Gregory H Payne,&nbsp;Jolene R Bostwick,&nbsp;April Fulbright,&nbsp;Jonathan F Lister,&nbsp;Andrew M Williams","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.04.036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.04.036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists (BCPPs) practice in a variety of inpatient and outpatient health care settings as part of collaborative, multidisciplinary teams. The American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) has promoted the expansion of psychiatric pharmacy through the development of psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs). Based on the standards developed during the creation and expansion of antimicrobial stewardship programs, psychotropic stewardship promotes the safe and appropriate use of psychotropic medications. AAPP envisions every patient with a psychiatric diagnosis will have their medication treatment plan reviewed, optimized, and managed by a psychotropic stewardship team with a psychiatric pharmacist as a co-leader. Because of variations in practice site resources, patient populations, and provider collaboration, the creation and implementation of PSPs should be based on site-specific needs and opportunities. Initial patient identification could prioritize those prescribed multiple medications, high-risk psychotropics, or comorbid medical diagnoses. However, every patient prescribed a psychotropic medication should have the opportunity to work with a PSP. Incremental implementation may be required during the planning stages of stewardship teams. Use of clinical practice-related core outcomes will allow for the optimization of program resources, increased recognition, and improved patient outcomes. PSPs should be patient-focused and integrate patients' preferences and access to recommended treatment options. The eventual goal of PSP implementation is official recognition by key regulatory agencies as a standard of care for patients who receive a diagnosis of a psychiatric or substance use disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 2","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/43/i2168-9709-13-2-36.PMC10094994.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9321341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
2022 MHC Awards and Recognition. 2022年MHC奖项和认可。
Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.02.001
Erica A K Davis, Amy VandenBerg
{"title":"2022 MHC Awards and Recognition.","authors":"Erica A K Davis,&nbsp;Amy VandenBerg","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.02.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/fa/i2168-9709-13-1-1.PMC9987258.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9430018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A preliminary evaluation of N-acetylcysteine's effects on patient adherence to treatment for cocaine use disorder. n -乙酰半胱氨酸对可卡因使用障碍患者依从性影响的初步评价。
Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.02.004
Jake Schechter, Geoffrey W Brown, Maria Janda

Introduction: Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a disabling disease associated with high rates of relapse and intense cravings. Patients with CUD struggle to adhere to treatment, which contributes to relapse and frequent readmissions to residential rehab (RR) facilities. Preliminary studies suggest that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuates cocaine-induced neuroplasticity and, therefore, may assist with cocaine abstinence and adherence to treatment.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study obtained data from 20 RR facilities across Western New York. Eligible subjects were 18 or older, diagnosed with CUD, and were divided based on their exposure to 1200 mg NAC twice daily during RR. The primary outcome was treatment adherence measured by outpatient treatment attendance rates (OTA). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in RR and craving severity on a 1 to 100 visual analog scale.

Results: One hundred eighty-eight (N = 188) patients were included in this investigation: NAC, n = 90; control, n = 98. NAC did not significantly impact OTA (% appointments attended), NAC 68%; control 69%, (P = .89) or craving severity NAC 34 ± 26; control 30 ± 27, (P = .38). Subjects treated with NAC had a significantly longer average LOS in RR compared with controls, NAC 86 ± 30; control 78 ± 26, (P = .04).

Discussion: In this study, NAC did not impact treatment adherence but was associated with a significantly longer LOS in RR for patients with CUD. Owing to limitations, these results may not be applicable to the general population. More rigorous studies examining NAC's impact on treatment adherence in CUD are warranted.

简介:可卡因使用障碍(CUD)是一种致残性疾病,与高复发率和强烈的渴望有关。CUD患者很难坚持治疗,这导致复发和频繁再入院的住宅康复(RR)设施。初步研究表明,n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)减弱可卡因诱导的神经可塑性,因此可能有助于可卡因戒断和坚持治疗。方法:这项回顾性队列研究获得了纽约西部20家RR机构的数据。符合条件的受试者为18岁或以上,诊断为CUD,并根据RR期间每天两次暴露于1200mg NAC进行分组。主要结局是通过门诊治疗出勤率(OTA)来衡量治疗依从性。次要结果包括RR的停留时间(LOS)和1到100的视觉模拟量表的渴望严重程度。结果:共纳入188例患者:NAC, 90例;对照组,n = 98。NAC对在线旅行社没有显著影响(赴约百分比),NAC 68%;对照组69% (P = 0.89)或渴望程度NAC 34±26;对照组30±27,(P = .38)。与对照组相比,NAC治疗组的平均LOS明显延长,NAC为86±30;对照组78±26,(P = .04)。讨论:在本研究中,NAC不影响治疗依从性,但与CUD患者的RR中LOS明显延长相关。由于局限性,这些结果可能不适用于一般人群。有必要进行更严格的研究,检查NAC对CUD治疗依从性的影响。
{"title":"A preliminary evaluation of N-acetylcysteine's effects on patient adherence to treatment for cocaine use disorder.","authors":"Jake Schechter,&nbsp;Geoffrey W Brown,&nbsp;Maria Janda","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.02.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a disabling disease associated with high rates of relapse and intense cravings. Patients with CUD struggle to adhere to treatment, which contributes to relapse and frequent readmissions to residential rehab (RR) facilities. Preliminary studies suggest that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuates cocaine-induced neuroplasticity and, therefore, may assist with cocaine abstinence and adherence to treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study obtained data from 20 RR facilities across Western New York. Eligible subjects were 18 or older, diagnosed with CUD, and were divided based on their exposure to 1200 mg NAC twice daily during RR. The primary outcome was treatment adherence measured by outpatient treatment attendance rates (OTA). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) in RR and craving severity on a 1 to 100 visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-eight (N = 188) patients were included in this investigation: NAC, n = 90; control, n = 98. NAC did not significantly impact OTA (% appointments attended), NAC 68%; control 69%, (<i>P</i> = .89) or craving severity NAC 34 ± 26; control 30 ± 27, (<i>P</i> = .38). Subjects treated with NAC had a significantly longer average LOS in RR compared with controls, NAC 86 ± 30; control 78 ± 26, (<i>P</i> = .04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, NAC did not impact treatment adherence but was associated with a significantly longer LOS in RR for patients with CUD. Owing to limitations, these results may not be applicable to the general population. More rigorous studies examining NAC's impact on treatment adherence in CUD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 1","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/78/i2168-9709-13-1-4.PMC9987261.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9137733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best practices for documentation of psychotropic drug-drug interactions in an adult psychiatric clinic. 成人精神病诊所中精神药物-药物相互作用的最佳记录实践。
Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.02.011
Kathryn Collins, Julie A Dopheide, Mengxi Wang, Talene Keshishian

Introduction: Psychotropic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) contribute to adverse drug events, but many go undetected or unmanaged. Thorough documentation of potential DDIs can improve patient safety. The primary objective of this study is to determine the quality of and factors associated with documentation of DDIs in an adult psychiatric clinic run by postgraduate year 3 psychiatry residents (PGY3s).

Methods: A list of high-alert psychotropic medications was identified by consulting primary literature on DDIs and clinic records. Charts of patients prescribed these medications by PGY3 residents from July 2021 to March 2022 were reviewed to detect potential DDIs and assess documentation. Chart documentation of DDIs was noted as none, partial, or complete.

Results: Chart review identified 146 DDIs among 129 patients. Among the 146 DDIs, 65% were not documented, 24% were partially documented, and 11% had complete documentation. The percentage of pharmacodynamic interactions documented was 68.6% with 35.3% of pharmacokinetic interactions documented. Factors associated with partial or complete documentation included diagnosis of psychotic disorder (p = .003), treatment with clozapine (p = .02), treatment with benzodiazepine-receptor agonist (p < .01), and assumption of care during July (p = .04). Factors associated with no documentation include diagnosis of "other (primarily impulse control disorder)" (p < .01) and taking an enzyme-inhibiting antidepressant (p < .01).

Discussion: Investigators propose best practices for psychotropic DDI documentation: (1) description and potential outcome of DDI, (2) monitoring and management, (3) Patient education on DDI, and (4) patient response to DDI education. Strategies to improve DDI documentation quality include targeted provider education, incentives, and electronic medical record "DDI smart phrases."

精神药物-药物相互作用(ddi)导致药物不良事件,但许多未被发现或未被管理。彻底记录潜在的ddi可以提高患者的安全性。本研究的主要目的是确定由研究生三年级精神病学住院医师(PGY3s)管理的成人精神病学诊所ddi记录的质量和相关因素。方法:通过查阅ddi的主要文献和临床记录,确定高警惕性精神药物清单。回顾了2021年7月至2022年3月PGY3居民处方这些药物的患者图表,以检测潜在的ddi并评估文件。ddi的图表文档记录为无、部分或完整。结果:图表回顾发现129例患者中有146例ddi。在146例ddi中,65%没有记录,24%部分记录,11%有完整的记录。记录的药效学相互作用比例为68.6%,记录的药代动力学相互作用比例为35.3%。与部分或完整文献相关的因素包括精神病诊断(p = 0.003)、氯氮平治疗(p = 0.02)、苯二氮卓受体激动剂治疗(p = 0.04)。与无文献记录相关的因素包括“其他(主要是冲动控制障碍)”的诊断。(p)讨论:研究者提出了精神药物DDI记录的最佳实践:(1)DDI的描述和潜在结果,(2)监测和管理,(3)DDI患者教育,(4)患者对DDI教育的反应。提高DDI文档质量的策略包括有针对性的提供者教育、激励措施和电子病历“DDI智能短语”。
{"title":"Best practices for documentation of psychotropic drug-drug interactions in an adult psychiatric clinic.","authors":"Kathryn Collins,&nbsp;Julie A Dopheide,&nbsp;Mengxi Wang,&nbsp;Talene Keshishian","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.02.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.02.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psychotropic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) contribute to adverse drug events, but many go undetected or unmanaged. Thorough documentation of potential DDIs can improve patient safety. The primary objective of this study is to determine the quality of and factors associated with documentation of DDIs in an adult psychiatric clinic run by postgraduate year 3 psychiatry residents (PGY3s).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of high-alert psychotropic medications was identified by consulting primary literature on DDIs and clinic records. Charts of patients prescribed these medications by PGY3 residents from July 2021 to March 2022 were reviewed to detect potential DDIs and assess documentation. Chart documentation of DDIs was noted as none, partial, or complete.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chart review identified 146 DDIs among 129 patients. Among the 146 DDIs, 65% were not documented, 24% were partially documented, and 11% had complete documentation. The percentage of pharmacodynamic interactions documented was 68.6% with 35.3% of pharmacokinetic interactions documented. Factors associated with partial or complete documentation included diagnosis of psychotic disorder (<i>p</i> = .003), treatment with clozapine (<i>p</i> = .02), treatment with benzodiazepine-receptor agonist (<i>p</i> < .01), and assumption of care during July (<i>p</i> = .04). Factors associated with no documentation include diagnosis of \"other (primarily impulse control disorder)\" (<i>p</i> < .01) and taking an enzyme-inhibiting antidepressant (<i>p</i> < .01).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Investigators propose best practices for psychotropic DDI documentation: (1) description and potential outcome of DDI, (2) monitoring and management, (3) Patient education on DDI, and (4) patient response to DDI education. Strategies to improve DDI documentation quality include targeted provider education, incentives, and electronic medical record \"DDI smart phrases.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/ee/i2168-9709-13-1-11.PMC9987259.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9082479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post hoc depression analysis from a pharmacist-led diabetes trial. 一项药剂师主导的糖尿病试验的事后抑郁分析。
Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2023.02.018
M Thomas Bateman, Caitlin McCarthy, Katherine M Prioli, Mary L Wagner

Introduction: Diabetes and depression may present concurrently, and clinical pharmacists are well equipped to manage these conditions. Clinical pharmacists were grant funded to implement a diabetes-focused randomized controlled trial in a Federally Qualified Health Center. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate if glycemic control and depressive symptoms improve for patients with diabetes and depression with additional management from clinical pharmacists compared with those receiving the standard of care.

Methods: This is a post hoc subgroup analysis of a diabetes-focused randomized controlled trial. Pharmacists enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a glycated hemoglobin (A1C) greater than 8% and randomly assigned them to 1 of 2 cohorts, one managed by the primary care provider alone and one with additional care from the pharmacist. Pharmacists completed encounters with patients who have T2DM with or without depression to comprehensively optimize pharmacotherapy while tracking glycemic and depressive outcomes throughout the study.

Results: A1C improved from baseline to 6 months in patients with depressive symptoms who received additional care from pharmacists by -2.4 percentage points (SD, 2.41) compared with a -0.1 percentage point (SD, 1.78) reduction in the control arm (P  .0081), and there was no change in depressive symptoms.

Discussion: Patients with T2DM and depressive symptoms experienced better diabetes outcomes with additional pharmacist management compared with a similar cohort of patients with depressive symptoms, managed independently by primary care providers. These patients with diabetes and comorbid depression received a higher level of engagement and care from the pharmacists, which led to more therapeutic interventions.

糖尿病和抑郁症可能同时出现,临床药师有很好的装备来管理这些条件。临床药剂师被授予资助,在联邦合格的健康中心实施一项以糖尿病为重点的随机对照试验。本分析的目的是评估与接受标准治疗的患者相比,接受临床药师额外管理的糖尿病和抑郁症患者的血糖控制和抑郁症状是否得到改善。方法:这是一项针对糖尿病的随机对照试验的事后亚组分析。药剂师招募了2型糖尿病(T2DM)和糖化血红蛋白(A1C)大于8%的患者,并将他们随机分配到2个队列中的1个,一个由初级保健提供者单独管理,另一个由药剂师提供额外护理。在整个研究过程中,药剂师完成了与伴有或不伴有抑郁的T2DM患者的接触,以全面优化药物治疗,同时跟踪血糖和抑郁结果。结果:从基线到6个月,接受药剂师额外护理的抑郁症状患者的A1C改善了-2.4个百分点(SD, 2.41),而对照组的A1C降低了-0.1个百分点(SD, 1.78) (P .0081),抑郁症状没有变化。讨论:与由初级保健提供者独立管理的类似抑郁症状队列患者相比,有额外药剂师管理的2型糖尿病合并抑郁症状患者的糖尿病结局更好。这些患有糖尿病和共病抑郁症的患者从药剂师那里得到了更高水平的参与和护理,这导致了更多的治疗干预。
{"title":"Post hoc depression analysis from a pharmacist-led diabetes trial.","authors":"M Thomas Bateman,&nbsp;Caitlin McCarthy,&nbsp;Katherine M Prioli,&nbsp;Mary L Wagner","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2023.02.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2023.02.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes and depression may present concurrently, and clinical pharmacists are well equipped to manage these conditions. Clinical pharmacists were grant funded to implement a diabetes-focused randomized controlled trial in a Federally Qualified Health Center. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate if glycemic control and depressive symptoms improve for patients with diabetes and depression with additional management from clinical pharmacists compared with those receiving the standard of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc subgroup analysis of a diabetes-focused randomized controlled trial. Pharmacists enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and a glycated hemoglobin (A1C) greater than 8% and randomly assigned them to 1 of 2 cohorts, one managed by the primary care provider alone and one with additional care from the pharmacist. Pharmacists completed encounters with patients who have T2DM with or without depression to comprehensively optimize pharmacotherapy while tracking glycemic and depressive outcomes throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A1C improved from baseline to 6 months in patients with depressive symptoms who received additional care from pharmacists by -2.4 percentage points (SD, 2.41) compared with a -0.1 percentage point (SD, 1.78) reduction in the control arm (<i>P</i>  .0081), and there was no change in depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Patients with T2DM and depressive symptoms experienced better diabetes outcomes with additional pharmacist management compared with a similar cohort of patients with depressive symptoms, managed independently by primary care providers. These patients with diabetes and comorbid depression received a higher level of engagement and care from the pharmacists, which led to more therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"13 1","pages":"18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/cd/i2168-9709-13-1-18.PMC9987260.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9076079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparison of antipsychotic prescribing practices following failure of antipsychotic monotherapy in the acute care setting. 在急症护理环境中,抗精神病药物单一疗法失败后的抗精神病药物处方实践比较。
Pub Date : 2023-01-05 eCollection Date: 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.9740/mhc.2022.12.329
Kaitlyn Morgan, Leah Rickert

Introduction: Numerous strategies exist following antipsychotic monotherapy failure including transition to another antipsychotic, dosing above FDA recommendations, or dual antipsychotic therapy. This study described antipsychotic prescribing practices on an acute psychiatry unit following antipsychotic monotherapy failure and compared outcomes to determine if any strategy resulted in superior short-term outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective chart review assessed postintervention time to discharge for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requiring therapy change following treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and discharge chlorpromazine equivalents.

Results: There were no differences in number of past antipsychotic trials between groups (4.8 vs 4.5; P = .73). Of all the patients, 73% (n = 30) discharged on alternative antipsychotic monotherapy while 27% (n = 11) discharged on dual antipsychotic therapy. No patients had doses increased above FDA recommendations. The alternative antipsychotic group had shorter mean postintervention time to discharge (8.8 vs 20.6 days; P = .003) and shorter mean length of stay (16.7 vs 32.1 days; P = .03). Median time to discharge was not statistically significant (6.4 vs 14.0 days; P = .17). The dual antipsychotic group had higher mean chlorpromazine equivalents (723 mg vs 356 mg; P = .002). There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates (16.7% vs 27.3%; χ2 = 0.5765; P = .45).

Discussion: This study found that following failure of antipsychotic monotherapy, transition to an alternative antipsychotic was associated with decreased mean time to discharge as compared to dual antipsychotic therapy. Further studies are needed to assess long-term clinical implications of these findings.

简介:抗精神病药物单一疗法失败后有许多策略,包括过渡到另一种抗精神病药物、剂量高于FDA建议或双重抗精神病药物治疗。本研究描述了一个急性精神病科在抗精神病药单一疗法失败后的抗精神病药处方做法,并对结果进行了比较,以确定是否有哪种策略能带来更好的短期疗效:这项回顾性病历审查评估了治疗失败后需要更换治疗方案的精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍患者的干预后出院时间。次要结果包括 30 天再入院率、住院时间和出院氯丙嗪当量:两组患者既往抗精神病药物试验次数无差异(4.8 vs 4.5;P = .73)。在所有患者中,73%(n = 30)的患者出院时接受了替代性抗精神病药物单药治疗,27%(n = 11)的患者出院时接受了双重抗精神病药物治疗。没有患者的剂量增加超过美国食品药品管理局的建议。替代抗精神病药物组的干预后平均出院时间更短(8.8 天 vs 20.6 天;P = .003),平均住院时间更短(16.7 天 vs 32.1 天;P = .03)。中位出院时间无统计学意义(6.4 天 vs 14.0 天;P = .17)。双重抗精神病药物组的平均氯丙嗪当量更高(723 毫克 vs 356 毫克;P = .002)。30天再入院率没有差异(16.7% vs 27.3%;χ2 = 0.5765;P = .45):本研究发现,在单一抗精神病药物治疗失败后,与双重抗精神病药物治疗相比,转用其他抗精神病药物与平均出院时间缩短有关。还需要进一步的研究来评估这些发现的长期临床意义。
{"title":"Comparison of antipsychotic prescribing practices following failure of antipsychotic monotherapy in the acute care setting.","authors":"Kaitlyn Morgan, Leah Rickert","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2022.12.329","DOIUrl":"10.9740/mhc.2022.12.329","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous strategies exist following antipsychotic monotherapy failure including transition to another antipsychotic, dosing above FDA recommendations, or dual antipsychotic therapy. This study described antipsychotic prescribing practices on an acute psychiatry unit following antipsychotic monotherapy failure and compared outcomes to determine if any strategy resulted in superior short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review assessed postintervention time to discharge for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder requiring therapy change following treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and discharge chlorpromazine equivalents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in number of past antipsychotic trials between groups (4.8 vs 4.5; <i>P</i> = .73). Of all the patients, 73% (n = 30) discharged on alternative antipsychotic monotherapy while 27% (n = 11) discharged on dual antipsychotic therapy. No patients had doses increased above FDA recommendations. The alternative antipsychotic group had shorter mean postintervention time to discharge (8.8 vs 20.6 days; <i>P</i> = .003) and shorter mean length of stay (16.7 vs 32.1 days; <i>P</i> = .03). Median time to discharge was not statistically significant (6.4 vs 14.0 days; <i>P</i> = .17). The dual antipsychotic group had higher mean chlorpromazine equivalents (723 mg vs 356 mg; <i>P</i> = .002). There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates (16.7% vs 27.3%; χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.5765; <i>P</i> = .45).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study found that following failure of antipsychotic monotherapy, transition to an alternative antipsychotic was associated with decreased mean time to discharge as compared to dual antipsychotic therapy. Further studies are needed to assess long-term clinical implications of these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":22710,"journal":{"name":"The Mental Health Clinician","volume":"12 6","pages":"329-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/a9/i2168-9709-12-6-329.PMC9819140.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10536116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Mental Health Clinician
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1