首页 > 最新文献

Therapeutic Advances in Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 速尿可提高体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石而非输尿管结石的结石清除率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221128473
Feng Yao, Ke Li, ShiQuan Huang, XueSong Cheng, XiaoLiang Jiang

Introduction: We conducted a meta-analysis (MA) to investigate the effects of furosemide on the prognosis of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) therapy to remove renal (RS) and ureteric stones (US).

Methods: We screened scientific databases including PubMed, Clinicalkey, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, from the date of establishment until March 2022, to search for randomized controlled trials evaluating SWL, in combination with furosemide (experimental group) or with SWL alone (control group), in treating RS or US. Our search terms included furosemide, extracorporeal SWL, and urolithiasis. For this MA, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan version 5.3.0.

Results: Six trials, involving 1344 participants, with RS (n = 1097) and/or US (n = 247), met our predefined criteria. This included 137 proximal ureteral stones (PUSs), 35 mid-ureteral stones (MUS), and 75 distal ureteral stones (DUS). In case of RS, the experimental group exhibited significantly enhanced clearance, relative to controls (risk ratio [RR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.25, p = 0.0002), yet there was no obvious difference in the PUS, MUS, and DUS (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.97-1.33, p = 0.10; odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.40-3.95, p = 0.69; RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99-1.49, p = 0.06). There was also no marked difference between fragmentations in either group. Only reports of SWL treatment of RS provided adequate data on shocks, sessions, and complications for our analysis. Unfortunately, there was no significant alteration between the two groups.

Conclusion: According to our analysis, furosemide strongly accelerates the clearance rate of SWL-treated RS. However, it does not enhance the fragmentation rate. Given this evidence, we propose that furosemide does not significantly improve the efficacy of SWL therapy in removing US.

Registration: Our work is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020204780).

简介:我们进行了一项荟萃分析(MA),研究速尿对体外冲击波碎石(SWL)治疗肾(RS)和输尿管结石(US)预后的影响。方法:我们筛选了PubMed、Clinicalkey、Google Scholar、Medline、Embase和Cochrane等科学数据库,从建立之日起至2022年3月,检索评估SWL联合呋塞米(实验组)或单独使用SWL(对照组)治疗RS或US的随机对照试验。我们的搜索词包括速尿、体外SWL和尿石症。对于这个MA,我们使用了Cochrane Collaboration的RevMan 5.3.0版本。结果:6项试验,涉及1344名受试者,RS (n = 1097)和/或US (n = 247)符合我们预先设定的标准。其中包括137例输尿管近端结石(PUSs), 35例输尿管中端结石(MUS)和75例输尿管远端结石(DUS)。在RS方面,实验组的清除率明显高于对照组(风险比[RR] = 1.16, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.07-1.25, p = 0.0002),而PUS、MUS和DUS无明显差异(RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.97-1.33, p = 0.10;比值比(或)= 1.26,95% CI -3.95 = 1.40, p = 0.69;RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99-1.49, p = 0.06)。两组的碎片之间也没有明显差异。只有SWL治疗RS的报告提供了足够的关于休克、疗程和并发症的数据供我们分析。不幸的是,两组之间没有明显的变化。结论:根据我们的分析,呋塞米对swl治疗的RS的清除率有明显的促进作用,但对其破碎率没有明显的促进作用。鉴于这一证据,我们认为呋塞米并不能显著提高SWL治疗去除US的疗效。注册:我们的作品已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42020204780)。
{"title":"Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Feng Yao,&nbsp;Ke Li,&nbsp;ShiQuan Huang,&nbsp;XueSong Cheng,&nbsp;XiaoLiang Jiang","doi":"10.1177/17562872221128473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221128473","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis (MA) to investigate the effects of furosemide on the prognosis of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) therapy to remove renal (RS) and ureteric stones (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened scientific databases including PubMed, Clinicalkey, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, from the date of establishment until March 2022, to search for randomized controlled trials evaluating SWL, in combination with furosemide (experimental group) or with SWL alone (control group), in treating RS or US. Our search terms included furosemide, extracorporeal SWL, and urolithiasis. For this MA, we employed the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan version 5.3.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six trials, involving 1344 participants, with RS (<i>n</i> = 1097) and/or US (<i>n</i> = 247), met our predefined criteria. This included 137 proximal ureteral stones (PUSs), 35 mid-ureteral stones (MUS), and 75 distal ureteral stones (DUS). In case of RS, the experimental group exhibited significantly enhanced clearance, relative to controls (risk ratio [RR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.25, <i>p</i> = 0.0002), yet there was no obvious difference in the PUS, MUS, and DUS (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.97-1.33, <i>p</i> = 0.10; odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.40-3.95, <i>p</i> = 0.69; RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.99-1.49, <i>p</i> = 0.06). There was also no marked difference between fragmentations in either group. Only reports of SWL treatment of RS provided adequate data on shocks, sessions, and complications for our analysis. Unfortunately, there was no significant alteration between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our analysis, furosemide strongly accelerates the clearance rate of SWL-treated RS. However, it does not enhance the fragmentation rate. Given this evidence, we propose that furosemide does not significantly improve the efficacy of SWL therapy in removing US.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Our work is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020204780).</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/ae/10.1177_17562872221128473.PMC9577065.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40649430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging. 人工智能在前列腺癌成像检测中的应用综述。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2022-10-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221128791
Indrani Bhattacharya, Yash S Khandwala, Sulaiman Vesal, Wei Shao, Qianye Yang, Simon J C Soerensen, Richard E Fan, Pejman Ghanouni, Christian A Kunder, James D Brooks, Yipeng Hu, Mirabela Rusu, Geoffrey A Sonn

A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care.

大量研究探讨了人工智能(AI)在为放射科医生、病理科医生和泌尿科医生提供前列腺癌检测、风险分级和管理方面的诊断支持中的作用。本综述全面概述了人工智能模型在以下方面应用的相关文献:(1) 在放射学图像(磁共振和超声成像)上检测前列腺癌;(2) 在前列腺活检组织的组织病理学图像上检测前列腺癌;(3) 协助支持前列腺癌检测任务(前列腺腺体分割、磁共振成像-组织病理学配准、磁共振成像-超声配准)。我们既讨论了这些人工智能模型在协助前列腺癌诊断临床工作流程方面的潜力,也讨论了目前存在的局限性,包括训练数据集、算法和评估标准方面的差异。我们还讨论了当前面临的挑战,以及如何缩小前列腺癌人工智能学术研究与改善常规临床护理的商业解决方案之间的差距。
{"title":"A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.","authors":"Indrani Bhattacharya, Yash S Khandwala, Sulaiman Vesal, Wei Shao, Qianye Yang, Simon J C Soerensen, Richard E Fan, Pejman Ghanouni, Christian A Kunder, James D Brooks, Yipeng Hu, Mirabela Rusu, Geoffrey A Sonn","doi":"10.1177/17562872221128791","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872221128791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/71/74/10.1177_17562872221128791.PMC9554123.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33545252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antimuscarinics for neurogenic overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis: real-life data. 多发性硬化症患者神经源性膀胱过度活动症的抗菌药物:真实数据。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221122484
Elena Andretta, Enrico Finazzi Agrò, Massimiliano Calabrese, Luca Orecchia, Antonietta Furlan, Cristina Zuliani

Background: Antimuscarinics (AMs) represent the mainstay of treatment for storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) but few data are available on their impact in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.

Objective: To assess effectiveness and tolerability of AMs in MS patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

Methods: Sixty consecutive outpatients, who started treatment with AMs at one centre, were recruited. The primary endpoint was change in Patient's Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) at 6 months; secondary endpoints were post-void residual urine (PVR) and pads used daily. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results: Significant reduction (p < 0.001) of mean PPIUS and pads use were detected, as well as a significant increase (p < 0.001) of PVR (143 ± 42 ml).AEs, recorded in 53% of patients, were frequently multiple and caused suspension of AM in 10% of cases, mainly for xerostomia, which has been the commonest AE (26.6%). Neurological AEs appeared in 11.7% of subjects, mostly with oxybutynin. Worsening/onset of voiding LUTS, reported by 8.3% of MS, resulted to be the unique AE correlated to AM dosage.

Conclusion: This study suggests that AMs are effective in MS patients, but their use should be tailored on every patient as even low dosages can be poorly tolerated. AEs, including neurological ones, are common.

背景:抗uscarinics (AMs)是储存性下尿路症状(LUTS)的主要治疗方法,但关于其对多发性硬化症(MS)患者的影响的数据很少。目的:评价AMs治疗多发性硬化症神经源性逼尿肌过度活动(NDO)的疗效和耐受性。方法:招募60名连续的门诊患者,他们在一个中心开始接受AMs治疗。主要终点是患者在6个月时的紧急程度感知量表(PPIUS)的变化;次要终点是空后残留尿(PVR)和每日使用的尿垫。记录不良事件发生率及严重程度。结果:显著降低(p p)结论:本研究提示AMs对MS患者有效,但其使用应针对每位患者,因为即使低剂量也可能耐受不良。ae,包括神经系统ae,是很常见的。
{"title":"Antimuscarinics for neurogenic overactive bladder in multiple sclerosis: real-life data.","authors":"Elena Andretta,&nbsp;Enrico Finazzi Agrò,&nbsp;Massimiliano Calabrese,&nbsp;Luca Orecchia,&nbsp;Antonietta Furlan,&nbsp;Cristina Zuliani","doi":"10.1177/17562872221122484","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221122484","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimuscarinics (AMs) represent the mainstay of treatment for storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) but few data are available on their impact in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess effectiveness and tolerability of AMs in MS patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty consecutive outpatients, who started treatment with AMs at one centre, were recruited. The primary endpoint was change in Patient's Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) at 6 months; secondary endpoints were post-void residual urine (PVR) and pads used daily. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001) of mean PPIUS and pads use were detected, as well as a significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.001) of PVR (143 ± 42 ml).AEs, recorded in 53% of patients, were frequently multiple and caused suspension of AM in 10% of cases, mainly for xerostomia, which has been the commonest AE (26.6%). Neurological AEs appeared in 11.7% of subjects, mostly with oxybutynin. Worsening/onset of voiding LUTS, reported by 8.3% of MS, resulted to be the unique AE correlated to AM dosage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that AMs are effective in MS patients, but their use should be tailored on every patient as even low dosages can be poorly tolerated. AEs, including neurological ones, are common.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d2/1e/10.1177_17562872221122484.PMC9510970.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40382614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiogenomics influence on the future of prostate cancer risk stratification. 放射基因组学对未来前列腺癌风险分层的影响。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221125317
Vinayak Banerjee, Shu Wang, Max Drescher, Ryan Russell, M Minhaj Siddiqui

In an era of powerful computing tools, radiogenomics provides a personalized, precise approach to the detection and diagnosis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Radiomics data are obtained through artificial intelligence (AI) and neural networks that analyze imaging, usually MRI, to assess statistical, geometrical, and textural features of images to provide quantitative data of shape, heterogeneity, and intensity of tumors. Genomics involves assessing the genomic markers that are present from tumor biopsies. In this article, we separately investigate the current landscape of radiomics and genomics within the realm of PCa and discuss the integration and validity of both into radiogenomics using the data from three papers on the topic. We also conducted a clinical trials search using the NIH's database, where we found two relevant actively recruiting studies. Although there is more research needed to be done on radiogenomics to fully adopt it as a viable diagnosis tool, its potential by providing personalized data regarding each tumor cannot be overlooked as it may be the future of PCa risk-stratification techniques.

在一个强大的计算工具的时代,放射基因组学为前列腺癌(PCa)患者的检测和诊断提供了个性化的、精确的方法。放射组学数据是通过人工智能(AI)和神经网络获得的,通过分析成像(通常是MRI)来评估图像的统计、几何和纹理特征,以提供肿瘤形状、异质性和强度的定量数据。基因组学包括评估肿瘤活检中存在的基因组标记物。在本文中,我们分别研究了PCa领域内放射组学和基因组学的现状,并使用有关该主题的三篇论文的数据讨论了两者在放射基因组学中的整合和有效性。我们还使用NIH的数据库进行了临床试验搜索,在那里我们发现了两个相关的积极招募研究。尽管需要对放射基因组学进行更多的研究,以充分采用它作为可行的诊断工具,但它通过提供每个肿瘤的个性化数据的潜力不容忽视,因为它可能是前列腺癌风险分层技术的未来。
{"title":"Radiogenomics influence on the future of prostate cancer risk stratification.","authors":"Vinayak Banerjee,&nbsp;Shu Wang,&nbsp;Max Drescher,&nbsp;Ryan Russell,&nbsp;M Minhaj Siddiqui","doi":"10.1177/17562872221125317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221125317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an era of powerful computing tools, radiogenomics provides a personalized, precise approach to the detection and diagnosis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Radiomics data are obtained through artificial intelligence (AI) and neural networks that analyze imaging, usually MRI, to assess statistical, geometrical, and textural features of images to provide quantitative data of shape, heterogeneity, and intensity of tumors. Genomics involves assessing the genomic markers that are present from tumor biopsies. In this article, we separately investigate the current landscape of radiomics and genomics within the realm of PCa and discuss the integration and validity of both into radiogenomics using the data from three papers on the topic. We also conducted a clinical trials search using the NIH's database, where we found two relevant actively recruiting studies. Although there is more research needed to be done on radiogenomics to fully adopt it as a viable diagnosis tool, its potential by providing personalized data regarding each tumor cannot be overlooked as it may be the future of PCa risk-stratification techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/c6/10.1177_17562872221125317.PMC9490455.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33484992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: lessons learned and outcomes in a Nordic setting. 输尿管镜检查在儿科人群结石疾病:经验教训和结果在北欧设置。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-22 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221118727
Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland, Øyvind Ulvik

Introduction: Paediatric stone disease is rare in the Nordic communities. Still, the condition can require surgical intervention in the form of ureteroscopy (URS). Here, we report outcomes achieved at a regional (tertiary) centre.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients (<18 years of age) undergoing URS for stone disease between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes of interest included stone-free rate (SFR) determined using a definition of no residual fragments ⩾ 3 mm on imaging and complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo system.

Results: In total, 23 patients underwent 47 URS procedures for a total of 31 stone episodes. Mean age was 9 (range 1-17) years and male-to-female ratio was 6:17. Overall, 35% had at least one medical comorbidity. Ultrasound determined preoperative stone status in 87%. Mean largest index and cumulative stone sizes were 9 (range 3-40) and 12 (range 3-40) mm, respectively. Overall, 32% had multiple stones. Lower pole was the commonest stone location (39%). No patients underwent elective pre-operative stenting. Ureteral access sheaths were not used in any cases. Access to upper urinary tract at first procedure was successful in 94%. Initial and final SFR was 61% and 90%, respectively. No intra-operative complications were recorded. Overall post-operative complication rate was 17.5%. Urinary tract infection (CD II) was the commonest adverse event (12.5%).

Conclusion: Paediatric URS can be delivered in the setting of a regional centre without compromising outcomes. This includes when carried out by adult endourologists, without routine pre-stenting and omitting use of ureteric access sheath.

儿童结石病在北欧社区是罕见的。尽管如此,这种情况可能需要输尿管镜检查(URS)的手术干预。在这里,我们报告了在区域(高等教育)中心取得的成果。患者和方法:对连续患者进行回顾性分析(结果:总共有23例患者接受了47次URS手术,共31次结石发作。平均年龄9岁(范围1-17岁),男女比例为6:17。总体而言,35%的人至少有一种医学合并症。术前超声检查结石的比例为87%。平均最大指数和累积结石大小分别为9(范围3-40)和12(范围3-40)毫米。总的来说,32%的人有多发结石。下极是最常见的结石位置(39%)。没有患者接受择期术前支架植入。所有病例均未使用输尿管导管。第一次手术进入上尿路的成功率为94%。初始和最终SFR分别为61%和90%。无术中并发症记录。术后并发症总发生率为17.5%。尿路感染(CD II)是最常见的不良事件(12.5%)。结论:儿科尿路尿潴留可以在区域中心进行,不会影响治疗效果。这包括由成人泌尿系统专家进行,没有常规的预支架植入和省略输尿管通路鞘的使用。
{"title":"Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: lessons learned and outcomes in a Nordic setting.","authors":"Patrick Juliebø-Jones,&nbsp;Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy,&nbsp;Peder Gjengstø,&nbsp;Christian Beisland,&nbsp;Øyvind Ulvik","doi":"10.1177/17562872221118727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221118727","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Paediatric stone disease is rare in the Nordic communities. Still, the condition can require surgical intervention in the form of ureteroscopy (URS). Here, we report outcomes achieved at a regional (tertiary) centre.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients (<18 years of age) undergoing URS for stone disease between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes of interest included stone-free rate (SFR) determined using a definition of no residual fragments ⩾ 3 mm on imaging and complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 23 patients underwent 47 URS procedures for a total of 31 stone episodes. Mean age was 9 (range 1-17) years and male-to-female ratio was 6:17. Overall, 35% had at least one medical comorbidity. Ultrasound determined preoperative stone status in 87%. Mean largest index and cumulative stone sizes were 9 (range 3-40) and 12 (range 3-40) mm, respectively. Overall, 32% had multiple stones. Lower pole was the commonest stone location (39%). No patients underwent elective pre-operative stenting. Ureteral access sheaths were not used in any cases. Access to upper urinary tract at first procedure was successful in 94%. Initial and final SFR was 61% and 90%, respectively. No intra-operative complications were recorded. Overall post-operative complication rate was 17.5%. Urinary tract infection (CD II) was the commonest adverse event (12.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Paediatric URS can be delivered in the setting of a regional centre without compromising outcomes. This includes when carried out by adult endourologists, without routine pre-stenting and omitting use of ureteric access sheath.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/2a/10.1177_17562872221118727.PMC9403456.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33442551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies. 一个优化的前列腺活检策略患者单侧病变的前列腺磁共振成像避免不必要的活检。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221111410
Auke Jager, Luigi A M J G van Riel, Arnoud W Postema, Theo M de Reijke, Tim M van der Sluis, Jorg R Oddens

Purpose: The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) besides systematic prostate biopsies has resulted in a discussion on what the optimal prostate biopsy strategy is. The ideal template has high sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), while reducing the detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa). This study evaluates different biopsy strategies in patients with a unilateral prostate MRI lesion.

Methods: Retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospectively managed database consisting of patients undergoing prostate biopsy in two academic centres. Patients with a unilateral lesion (PI-RADS ⩾ 3) on MRI were included for analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance for different biopsy approaches compared with bilateral systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) and TBx. Detection rates for csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 2), adjusted csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 3) and iPCa (ISUP = 1) were determined for SBx alone, TBx alone, contralateral SBx combined with TBx and ipsilateral SBx combined with TBx. A subgroup analysis was performed for biopsy-naive patients.

Results: A total of 228 patients were included from October 2015 to September 2021. Prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of combined SBx and TBx was 63.5% for csPCa, 35.5% for adjusted csPCa, and 14% for iPCa. The best performing alternative biopsy strategy was TBx and ipsilateral SBx, which reached a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6) for csPCa and 98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) for adjusted csPCa, missing only 1.4% of csPCa, while reducing iPCa detection by 15.6% compared with SBx and TBx. TBx or SBx alone missed a significant amount of csPCa, with sensitivities of 90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2) and 86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4) for csPCa. Subgroup analysis on biopsy-naive patients showed similar results as the overall group.

Conclusion: This study shows that performing TBx with ipsilateral SBx and omitting contralateral SBx is the optimal biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral MRI lesion. With this strategy, a very limited amount of csPCa is missed and iPCa detection is reduced.

目的:在系统前列腺活检的基础上引入磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检(TBx),引起了对最佳前列腺活检策略的讨论。理想模板对临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)具有较高的敏感性,同时降低了临床不显著性前列腺癌(iPCa)的检出率。本研究评估了单侧前列腺MRI病变患者的不同活检策略。方法:回顾性亚组分析前瞻性管理数据库,包括在两个学术中心接受前列腺活检的患者。MRI上单侧病变(PI-RADS大于或等于3)的患者被纳入分析。主要目的是评估不同活检方法与双侧系统前列腺活检(SBx)和TBx的诊断性能。确定单独SBx、单独TBx、对侧SBx联合TBx和同侧SBx联合TBx的csPCa (ISUP小于或等于2)、调整后的csPCa (ISUP小于或等于3)和iPCa (ISUP = 1)的检出率。对未进行活检的患者进行亚组分析。结果:2015年10月至2021年9月共纳入228例患者。csPCa的前列腺癌(PCa)检出率为63.5%,调整后的csPCa为35.5%,iPCa为14%。最佳的替代活检策略是TBx和同侧SBx,对csPCa的敏感性为98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6),对调整后的csPCa的敏感性为98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9),仅遗漏了1.4%的csPCa,而与SBx和TBx相比,iPCa的检出率降低了15.6%。TBx或单独SBx对csPCa的敏感性分别为90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2)和86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4)。首次活检患者的亚组分析显示与整体组相似的结果。结论:本研究表明,对单侧MRI病变患者行同侧SBx行TBx,而不行对侧SBx是最佳的活检策略。使用这种策略,csPCa的数量非常有限,iPCa的检测也减少了。
{"title":"An optimized prostate biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral lesion on prostate magnetic resonance imaging avoids unnecessary biopsies.","authors":"Auke Jager,&nbsp;Luigi A M J G van Riel,&nbsp;Arnoud W Postema,&nbsp;Theo M de Reijke,&nbsp;Tim M van der Sluis,&nbsp;Jorg R Oddens","doi":"10.1177/17562872221111410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221111410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) besides systematic prostate biopsies has resulted in a discussion on what the optimal prostate biopsy strategy is. The ideal template has high sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), while reducing the detection rate of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (iPCa). This study evaluates different biopsy strategies in patients with a unilateral prostate MRI lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective subgroup analysis of a prospectively managed database consisting of patients undergoing prostate biopsy in two academic centres. Patients with a unilateral lesion (PI-RADS ⩾ 3) on MRI were included for analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance for different biopsy approaches compared with bilateral systematic prostate biopsy (SBx) and TBx. Detection rates for csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 2), adjusted csPCa (ISUP ⩾ 3) and iPCa (ISUP = 1) were determined for SBx alone, TBx alone, contralateral SBx combined with TBx and ipsilateral SBx combined with TBx. A subgroup analysis was performed for biopsy-naive patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 228 patients were included from October 2015 to September 2021. Prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate of combined SBx and TBx was 63.5% for csPCa, 35.5% for adjusted csPCa, and 14% for iPCa. The best performing alternative biopsy strategy was TBx and ipsilateral SBx, which reached a sensitivity of 98.6% (95% CI: 95.1-99.6) for csPCa and 98.8% (95% CI: 96.3-99.9) for adjusted csPCa, missing only 1.4% of csPCa, while reducing iPCa detection by 15.6% compared with SBx and TBx. TBx or SBx alone missed a significant amount of csPCa, with sensitivities of 90.3% (95% CI: 84.4-94.2) and 86.8% (95% CI: 80.4-91.4) for csPCa. Subgroup analysis on biopsy-naive patients showed similar results as the overall group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that performing TBx with ipsilateral SBx and omitting contralateral SBx is the optimal biopsy strategy in patients with a unilateral MRI lesion. With this strategy, a very limited amount of csPCa is missed and iPCa detection is reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/2b/10.1177_17562872221111410.PMC9340407.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40669715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review. 多参数磁共振成像融合活检在前列腺癌主动监测中的作用:系统综述。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221106883
Elizabeth E Ellis, Thomas P Frye

Background: Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) versus systematic biopsy (SB), and progression-free survival.

Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and identified 121 articles. A narrative summary was performed.

Results: Thirty-two articles were chosen to be featured in this review. SB and FB are complementary in detecting higher-grade disease in follow-up. While FB was more likely than SB to detect clinically significant disease, FB missed 6.4-11% of clinically significant disease. Imaging factors that predicted upgrading include number of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lesion density, and MRI suspicion level.

Conclusion: Incorporating mpMRI FB in conjunction with SB should be part of contemporary AS protocols. mpMRI should additionally be used routinely for follow-up; however, mpMRI is not currently sensitive enough in detecting disease progression to replace biopsy in the surveillance protocol.

背景:我们的目的是回顾目前关于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)在前列腺癌(PCa)主动监测(AS)中的作用的文献,并确定风险类别重新分类率、融合活检(FB)与系统活检(SB)的表现以及无进展生存期的趋势。方法:我们在PubMed中进行了全面的文献检索,并确定了121篇文章。进行了叙述性总结。结果:32篇文章入选本综述。SB和FB在随访中发现高级别疾病方面是互补的。虽然FB比SB更容易发现临床重要疾病,但FB遗漏了6.4-11%的临床重要疾病。预测升级的影像学因素包括磁共振成像(MRI)病变数量、病变密度和MRI可疑程度。结论:将mpMRI FB与SB结合应成为当代AS治疗方案的一部分。此外,应常规使用mpMRI进行随访;然而,mpMRI目前在检测疾病进展方面还不够敏感,无法在监测方案中取代活检。
{"title":"Role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging fusion biopsy in active surveillance of prostate cancer: a systematic review.","authors":"Elizabeth E Ellis,&nbsp;Thomas P Frye","doi":"10.1177/17562872221106883","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221106883","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our goal is to review current literature regarding the role of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) and identify trends in rate of reclassification of risk category, performance of fusion biopsy (FB) <i>versus</i> systematic biopsy (SB), and progression-free survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed and identified 121 articles. A narrative summary was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two articles were chosen to be featured in this review. SB and FB are complementary in detecting higher-grade disease in follow-up. While FB was more likely than SB to detect clinically significant disease, FB missed 6.4-11% of clinically significant disease. Imaging factors that predicted upgrading include number of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), lesion density, and MRI suspicion level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating mpMRI FB in conjunction with SB should be part of contemporary AS protocols. mpMRI should additionally be used routinely for follow-up; however, mpMRI is not currently sensitive enough in detecting disease progression to replace biopsy in the surveillance protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/17/10.1177_17562872221106883.PMC9297445.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40618923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy. 增强根治性膀胱切除术术后恢复的最新进展。
IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2022-07-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221109022
Grace Lee, Hiren V Patel, Arnav Srivastava, Saum Ghodoussipour

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway that provides evidence-based guidance for improving perioperative care and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. In 2013, the ERAS society released its original guidelines for radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC), adopting much of its supporting data from colorectal literature. In the last decade, growing interest in ERAS has increased RC-specific ERAS research, including prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Collective data suggest ERAS contributes to improved complication rates, decreased hospital length-of-stay, and/or time to bowel recovery. Various institutions have adopted modified versions of the ERAS pathway, yet there remains a lack of consensus on the efficacy of specific ERAS items and standardization of the protocol. In this review, we summarize updated evidence and practice patterns of ERAS pathways for RC since the introduction of the original 2013 guidelines. Novel target interventions, including use of immunonutrition, prehabilitation, alvimopan, and methods of local analgesia are reviewed. Finally, we discuss barriers to implementing and future steps in advancing the ERAS movement.

术后强化恢复(ERAS)是一种多模式路径,为改善手术患者的围手术期护理和预后提供循证指导。2013 年,ERAS 协会发布了针对膀胱癌(BC)根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的原始指南,其中大部分支持数据来自结直肠文献。过去十年间,人们对ERAS的兴趣与日俱增,针对膀胱癌根治术的ERAS研究也随之增加,其中包括前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)。综合数据表明,ERAS 有助于提高并发症发生率、缩短住院时间和/或肠道恢复时间。不同的机构已经采用了ERAS路径的修改版本,但对于ERAS特定项目的疗效和方案的标准化仍缺乏共识。在本综述中,我们总结了自 2013 年最初的指南出台以来,针对 RC 的 ERAS 路径的最新证据和实践模式。我们还回顾了新的目标干预措施,包括使用免疫营养、预康复、阿维莫潘和局部镇痛方法。最后,我们讨论了推进 ERAS 运动的实施障碍和未来步骤。
{"title":"Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy.","authors":"Grace Lee, Hiren V Patel, Arnav Srivastava, Saum Ghodoussipour","doi":"10.1177/17562872221109022","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872221109022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway that provides evidence-based guidance for improving perioperative care and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. In 2013, the ERAS society released its original guidelines for radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC), adopting much of its supporting data from colorectal literature. In the last decade, growing interest in ERAS has increased RC-specific ERAS research, including prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Collective data suggest ERAS contributes to improved complication rates, decreased hospital length-of-stay, and/or time to bowel recovery. Various institutions have adopted modified versions of the ERAS pathway, yet there remains a lack of consensus on the efficacy of specific ERAS items and standardization of the protocol. In this review, we summarize updated evidence and practice patterns of ERAS pathways for RC since the introduction of the original 2013 guidelines. Novel target interventions, including use of immunonutrition, prehabilitation, alvimopan, and methods of local analgesia are reviewed. Finally, we discuss barriers to implementing and future steps in advancing the ERAS movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/dd/10.1177_17562872221109022.PMC9280843.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40512617","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review. 前列腺癌症的放射组学:最新综述。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-04 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221109020
Matteo Ferro, Ottavio de Cobelli, Gennaro Musi, Francesco Del Giudice, Giuseppe Carrieri, Gian Maria Busetto, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Alessandro Sciarra, Martina Maggi, Felice Crocetto, Biagio Barone, Vincenzo Francesco Caputo, Michele Marchioni, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Ciro Imbimbo, Francesco Alessandro Mistretta, Stefano Luzzago, Mihai Dorin Vartolomei, Luigi Cormio, Riccardo Autorino, Octavian Sabin Tătaru

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications.

癌症(PCa)是全世界男性最常见的恶性肿瘤。诊断、侵袭性疾病的识别和治疗后的随访需要更全面、更全面的方法。放射组学是以定量的方式提取和解释图像表型。放射组学可以通过成像模式的进步和人工智能技术的潜在力量,将这些特征转化为临床结果预测,从而发挥优势。本文概述了目前的方法学证据,并回顾了PCa患者放射组学的现有文献,强调了其个性化治疗的潜力和未来的应用。
{"title":"Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.","authors":"Matteo Ferro,&nbsp;Ottavio de Cobelli,&nbsp;Gennaro Musi,&nbsp;Francesco Del Giudice,&nbsp;Giuseppe Carrieri,&nbsp;Gian Maria Busetto,&nbsp;Ugo Giovanni Falagario,&nbsp;Alessandro Sciarra,&nbsp;Martina Maggi,&nbsp;Felice Crocetto,&nbsp;Biagio Barone,&nbsp;Vincenzo Francesco Caputo,&nbsp;Michele Marchioni,&nbsp;Giuseppe Lucarelli,&nbsp;Ciro Imbimbo,&nbsp;Francesco Alessandro Mistretta,&nbsp;Stefano Luzzago,&nbsp;Mihai Dorin Vartolomei,&nbsp;Luigi Cormio,&nbsp;Riccardo Autorino,&nbsp;Octavian Sabin Tătaru","doi":"10.1177/17562872221109020","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872221109020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common worldwide diagnosed malignancy in male population. The diagnosis, the identification of aggressive disease, and the post-treatment follow-up needs a more comprehensive and holistic approach. Radiomics is the extraction and interpretation of images phenotypes in a quantitative manner. Radiomics may give an advantage through advancements in imaging modalities and through the potential power of artificial intelligence techniques by translating those features into clinical outcome prediction. This article gives an overview on the current evidence of methodology and reviews the available literature on radiomics in PCa patients, highlighting its potential for personalized treatment and future applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/1d/10.1177_17562872221109020.PMC9260602.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40593391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51
Schema and cancer detection rates for transperineal prostate biopsy templates: a review. 经会阴前列腺活检模板的模式和癌症检出率:综述。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-26 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221105019
Abhinav Sidana, Fernando Blank, Hannah Wang, Nilesh Patil, Arvin K George, Hasan Abbas

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men and is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men in the United States. Current practice requires histopathological confirmation of cancer achieved through biopsy for diagnosis. The transrectal approach for prostate biopsy has been the standard for several decades. However, the risks and limitations of transrectal biopsies have led to a recent resurgence of transperineal prostatic biopsies. Recent studies have demonstrated the transperineal approach for prostate biopsies to be effective, associated with minimal complications and superior in several aspects to traditional transrectal biopsies. While sextant and extended sextant templates are widely accepted templates for transrectal biopsy, there are a diverse set of transperineal biopsy templates available for use, without consensus on the optimal sampling strategy. We aim to critically appraise the salient features of established transperineal biopsy templates.

前列腺癌(PCa)是男性最常见的非皮肤恶性肿瘤,也是美国男性癌症死亡率的第二大原因。目前的实践要求通过活检来确诊癌症。经直肠入路前列腺活检已经是几十年来的标准方法。然而,经直肠活检的风险和局限性导致了最近经会阴前列腺活检的复苏。最近的研究表明,经会阴入路前列腺活检是有效的,并发症最少,在几个方面优于传统的经直肠活检。虽然六分仪和扩展六分仪模板是经直肠活检广泛接受的模板,但可使用的经会阴活检模板多种多样,对最佳采样策略尚无共识。我们的目的是批判性地评估已建立的经会阴活检模板的显著特征。
{"title":"Schema and cancer detection rates for transperineal prostate biopsy templates: a review.","authors":"Abhinav Sidana,&nbsp;Fernando Blank,&nbsp;Hannah Wang,&nbsp;Nilesh Patil,&nbsp;Arvin K George,&nbsp;Hasan Abbas","doi":"10.1177/17562872221105019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221105019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in men and is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men in the United States. Current practice requires histopathological confirmation of cancer achieved through biopsy for diagnosis. The transrectal approach for prostate biopsy has been the standard for several decades. However, the risks and limitations of transrectal biopsies have led to a recent resurgence of transperineal prostatic biopsies. Recent studies have demonstrated the transperineal approach for prostate biopsies to be effective, associated with minimal complications and superior in several aspects to traditional transrectal biopsies. While sextant and extended sextant templates are widely accepted templates for transrectal biopsy, there are a diverse set of transperineal biopsy templates available for use, without consensus on the optimal sampling strategy. We aim to critically appraise the salient features of established transperineal biopsy templates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/3a/10.1177_17562872221105019.PMC9243579.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40467876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1