首页 > 最新文献

Therapeutic Advances in Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Insights and outcomes of day-case percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. 每日经皮肾镜取石术的见解和结果:一项系统综述和单臂荟萃分析的结果。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251389084
Shreehari Suresh, Sylvia Ling, Dilip K Vankayalapati, Sherwin M Ganegoda, Bhaskar Somani

Background: Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure, day-case or ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has emerged in recent years as a promising alternative offering the potential to reduce hospital admissions and healthcare costs, without compromising patient outcomes.

Objectives: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to critically evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall outcomes of day-case PCNL.

Design: The systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses).

Data sources and methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Cochrane Databases from inception until January 2025 (CRD42024584357). The PICO statement for this systematic review is as follows: in patients with renal stones, what are the outcomes of day-case PCNL (intervention) compared with inpatient PCNL (comparator)? The authors included studies with more than 50 adult patients evaluating day-case PCNL (postoperative hospital stay ⩽ 24 h) written in the English language.

Results: From an initial literature search of 2122 articles, 16 studies were identified, from which 3133 patients were included. A variety of standard, mini and ultra-mini techniques were used, with the majority opting for tubeless (61%) or totally tubeless PCNL (16%). The mean stone size was 21.5 ± 13.5 mm, with five studies including patients with renal structural abnormalities (3.6%). The pooled mean stone-free rate (SFR) was 90% (95% CI: 0.859-0.931), with a readmission rate of 3.2% (95% CI: 0.018-0.046). The overall complication rate was 10.7% (95% CI: 0.078-0.137), with most complications classified as minor with Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (9.1%) and III-IV (1.6%). The quality assessment of the included literature revealed that all studies were of moderate to high quality.

Conclusion: Day-case PCNL represents a safe and viable approach that has seen a growing adoption over recent years, driven in part by post-pandemic healthcare trends. Our review underscores its efficacy, marked by favourable outcomes and a low incidence of complications and readmissions. Moreover, detailed planning is paramount in order to establish clear criteria for potential surgical candidates and indications for inpatient admission, as well as a thorough follow-up plan.

背景:传统上,经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种住院手术,近年来,日间或门诊经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)作为一种有希望的替代方法出现,具有减少住院和医疗成本的潜力,而且不会影响患者的预后。目的:进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以批判性地评估日例PCNL的有效性、安全性和总体结果。设计:系统评价按照PRISMA指南(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)进行。数据来源和方法:我们对MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CENTRAL和Cochrane数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从数据库建立到2025年1月(CRD42024584357)。本系统综述的PICO声明如下:在肾结石患者中,与住院患者PCNL(比较组)相比,日间PCNL(干预组)的结果如何?作者纳入了50多名成年患者评估PCNL(术后住院时间≥24小时)的研究,这些研究以英语书写。结果:从最初的2122篇文献检索中,确定了16项研究,其中包括3133名患者。使用了各种标准、迷你和超迷你技术,大多数选择无管(61%)或完全无管PCNL(16%)。平均结石大小为21.5±13.5 mm,其中5项研究包括肾脏结构异常患者(3.6%)。合并平均无结石率(SFR)为90% (95% CI: 0.859-0.931),再入院率为3.2% (95% CI: 0.018-0.046)。总并发症发生率为10.7% (95% CI: 0.078 ~ 0.137),大多数并发症为轻微并发症,分为Clavien-Dindo I-II级(9.1%)和III-IV级(1.6%)。纳入文献的质量评估显示,所有研究均为中等至高质量。结论:日病例PCNL是一种安全可行的方法,近年来越来越多地采用这种方法,部分原因是受大流行后卫生保健趋势的推动。我们的回顾强调了其疗效,其特点是良好的结果和低并发症和再入院率。此外,详细的计划是至关重要的,以便为潜在的手术候选人和住院病人的适应症建立明确的标准,以及一个彻底的随访计划。
{"title":"Insights and outcomes of day-case percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Shreehari Suresh, Sylvia Ling, Dilip K Vankayalapati, Sherwin M Ganegoda, Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1177/17562872251389084","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251389084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally performed as an inpatient procedure, day-case or ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has emerged in recent years as a promising alternative offering the potential to reduce hospital admissions and healthcare costs, without compromising patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to critically evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall outcomes of day-case PCNL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses).</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Cochrane Databases from inception until January 2025 (CRD42024584357). The PICO statement for this systematic review is as follows: in patients with renal stones, what are the outcomes of day-case PCNL (intervention) compared with inpatient PCNL (comparator)? The authors included studies with more than 50 adult patients evaluating day-case PCNL (postoperative hospital stay ⩽ 24 h) written in the English language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an initial literature search of 2122 articles, 16 studies were identified, from which 3133 patients were included. A variety of standard, mini and ultra-mini techniques were used, with the majority opting for tubeless (61%) or totally tubeless PCNL (16%). The mean stone size was 21.5 ± 13.5 mm, with five studies including patients with renal structural abnormalities (3.6%). The pooled mean stone-free rate (SFR) was 90% (95% CI: 0.859-0.931), with a readmission rate of 3.2% (95% CI: 0.018-0.046). The overall complication rate was 10.7% (95% CI: 0.078-0.137), with most complications classified as minor with Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (9.1%) and III-IV (1.6%). The quality assessment of the included literature revealed that all studies were of moderate to high quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Day-case PCNL represents a safe and viable approach that has seen a growing adoption over recent years, driven in part by post-pandemic healthcare trends. Our review underscores its efficacy, marked by favourable outcomes and a low incidence of complications and readmissions. Moreover, detailed planning is paramount in order to establish clear criteria for potential surgical candidates and indications for inpatient admission, as well as a thorough follow-up plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251389084"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12559678/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment of aggressive prostate cancer with triptorelin in real life in France: the TALISMAN study. 在法国的现实生活中,用曲普利林治疗侵袭性前列腺癌:TALISMAN研究。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251382970
Thierry Lebret, Gilles Crehange, Nathalie Pello-Leprince-Ringuet, Valérie Perrot, Jérôme Rigaud

Background: Data on modalities of real-world use of androgen deprivation therapy, such as triptorelin, in men with prostate cancer (PCa) are lacking.

Objectives: To describe the real-world management of triptorelin treatment over 12 months following treatment initiation in France, and to gain a better understanding of the choices being made about planned total treatment duration, formulation, and route of administration.

Design: TALISMAN was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, non-interventional study.

Methods: Patients with PCa eligible for triptorelin treatment for at least 12 months were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of patients treated continuously with triptorelin during the 12 months following treatment initiation. Planned total duration of treatment, formulation, administration route, and reasons for these choices were evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Quality-of-life and safety data were collected.

Results: Overall, 806 patients were enrolled, of whom 787 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 74.0 (7.9) years, the main circumstance of prescription of triptorelin was a high-risk localized tumor (41.1%). Planned total duration of treatment at baseline was most commonly 24-36 months, and the main reasons for the choice of duration were Gleason score and guideline recommendations. Most patients (72.5%) received the 3-month subcutaneous formulation at baseline; main reasons for choice of formulation and route were physician preference and planned total duration of treatment. Overall, 85.3% (95% confidence interval (82.6, 87.7)) of patients received a continuous 12-month treatment with triptorelin, and 69.1% of patients undertook at least one supportive care pathway during the study period. Patients reported an increase in hormonal treatment-related symptoms and worsening of sexual activity and functioning. There were no new or unexpected safety findings.

Conclusion: In France, compliance with continuous triptorelin treatment for 12 months is high and prescribing aligns with guideline recommendations.

Trial registration: NCT04593420.

背景:关于前列腺癌(PCa)患者实际使用雄激素剥夺疗法(如triptorelin)的模式的数据缺乏。目的:描述在法国开始治疗后的12个月里,雷普利林治疗的实际管理情况,并更好地了解计划总治疗时间、配方和给药途径的选择。设计:TALISMAN是一项前瞻性、多中心、纵向、非干预性研究。方法:纳入符合triptorelin治疗至少12个月的PCa患者,随访12个月。主要目的是描述在治疗开始后的12个月内持续使用雷普利林治疗的患者比例。在基线、6个月和12个月时评估计划的总治疗时间、配方、给药途径和这些选择的原因。收集生活质量和安全数据。结果:共纳入806例患者,其中787例纳入分析。平均(标准差)年龄为74.0(7.9)岁,处方雷普托雷林的主要情况为局限性高危肿瘤(41.1%)。基线时计划总治疗时间通常为24-36个月,选择疗程的主要原因是Gleason评分和指南建议。大多数患者(72.5%)在基线时接受了3个月的皮下配方;选择处方和途径的主要原因是医生偏好和计划的总治疗时间。总体而言,85.3%(95%可信区间(82.6,87.7))的患者在研究期间接受了持续12个月的雷普托雷林治疗,69.1%的患者接受了至少一种支持治疗途径。患者报告激素治疗相关症状增加,性活动和性功能恶化。没有新的或意外的安全发现。结论:在法国,持续12个月的雷普妥林治疗的依从性很高,处方与指南建议一致。试验注册:NCT04593420。
{"title":"Treatment of aggressive prostate cancer with triptorelin in real life in France: the TALISMAN study.","authors":"Thierry Lebret, Gilles Crehange, Nathalie Pello-Leprince-Ringuet, Valérie Perrot, Jérôme Rigaud","doi":"10.1177/17562872251382970","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251382970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on modalities of real-world use of androgen deprivation therapy, such as triptorelin, in men with prostate cancer (PCa) are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the real-world management of triptorelin treatment over 12 months following treatment initiation in France, and to gain a better understanding of the choices being made about planned total treatment duration, formulation, and route of administration.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>TALISMAN was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, non-interventional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with PCa eligible for triptorelin treatment for at least 12 months were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of patients treated continuously with triptorelin during the 12 months following treatment initiation. Planned total duration of treatment, formulation, administration route, and reasons for these choices were evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Quality-of-life and safety data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 806 patients were enrolled, of whom 787 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 74.0 (7.9) years, the main circumstance of prescription of triptorelin was a high-risk localized tumor (41.1%). Planned total duration of treatment at baseline was most commonly 24-36 months, and the main reasons for the choice of duration were Gleason score and guideline recommendations. Most patients (72.5%) received the 3-month subcutaneous formulation at baseline; main reasons for choice of formulation and route were physician preference and planned total duration of treatment. Overall, 85.3% (95% confidence interval (82.6, 87.7)) of patients received a continuous 12-month treatment with triptorelin, and 69.1% of patients undertook at least one supportive care pathway during the study period. Patients reported an increase in hormonal treatment-related symptoms and worsening of sexual activity and functioning. There were no new or unexpected safety findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In France, compliance with continuous triptorelin treatment for 12 months is high and prescribing aligns with guideline recommendations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04593420.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251382970"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145347449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zero residual fragment ureteroscopy: from possibility to reality - an EAU endourology perspective. 零残留碎片输尿管镜:从可能性到现实-一个EAU泌尿学的视角。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251385044
Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Olivier Traxer, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Bhaskar Kumar Somani
{"title":"Zero residual fragment ureteroscopy: from possibility to reality - an EAU endourology perspective.","authors":"Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Olivier Traxer, Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Bhaskar Kumar Somani","doi":"10.1177/17562872251385044","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251385044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251385044"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145281172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there a "Best ureteroscope" for flexible ureteroscopy with FANS: an EAU-endourology perspective. 柔性输尿管镜与FANS是否存在“最佳输尿管镜”:一个eau - endology的观点。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251382750
Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen, Guohua Zeng, Thomas Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Is there a \"Best ureteroscope\" for flexible ureteroscopy with FANS: an EAU-endourology perspective.","authors":"Vineet Gauhar, Daniele Castellani, Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen, Guohua Zeng, Thomas Herrmann, Olivier Traxer, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1177/17562872251382750","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251382750","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251382750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477354/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145200637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Peripheral electrical stimulation for premature ejaculation: a systematic review of clinical studies. 外周电刺激治疗早泄:临床研究的系统回顾。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251382317
Fateme Tahmasbi, Alireza Rahimi-Mamaghani, Farzin Soleimanzadeh, Omid Sedigh, Sarvin Sanaie, Mohsen Mohammad-Rahimi

Background: Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common sexual disorder characterized by a lack of voluntary control over ejaculation. Current treatments often fail to produce consistently satisfactory outcomes. Peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) is an emerging neuromodulation technique that applies electrical currents to targeted body areas and has shown promise across various conditions.

Objectives: Although the use of PES for PE is relatively underexplored, this study aimed to synthesize existing research to better understand its potential as a treatment option.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords. Studies were included if they investigated PES as a treatment for PE and reported outcomes such as intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) or other clinical measures.

Results: Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. Due to the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and a narrative synthesis was performed. Stimulation was applied transcutaneously in various ways, including at acupuncture points, the dorsal penile nerve, and the posterior tibial nerve. Protocols varied considerably, though commonly reported parameters included a pulse frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 µs, typically administered in 30-min sessions. Some studies lacked detailed descriptions of stimulation settings. Overall, the studies demonstrated a positive trend in favor of PES for prolonging IELT, and no consistent or significant adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that PES may be a promising adjunctive therapy for men with PE by prolonging IELT. Further high-quality research using validated patient-reported outcomes is needed to clarify the impact of PES on perceived ejaculatory control and sexual satisfaction.

Trial registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024551360).

背景:早泄(PE)是一种常见的性功能障碍,其特征是缺乏对射精的自主控制。目前的治疗方法往往不能产生持续的令人满意的结果。外周电刺激(PES)是一种新兴的神经调节技术,它将电流应用于目标身体区域,并在各种情况下显示出前景。目的:尽管PES治疗PE的研究相对较少,但本研究旨在综合现有研究,以更好地了解其作为治疗选择的潜力。设计:系统回顾。数据来源和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar等相关关键词。如果研究将PES作为PE的治疗方法,并报告了诸如阴道内射精潜伏期(雅思)或其他临床测量的结果,则纳入研究。结果:10项研究符合入选标准。由于研究的数量有限和异质性,meta分析是不可行的,并进行了叙述综合。刺激以各种方式经皮应用,包括穴位、阴茎背神经和胫后神经。方案差异很大,但通常报道的参数包括脉冲频率为20 Hz,脉冲宽度为200µs,通常为30分钟。一些研究缺乏对刺激环境的详细描述。总的来说,这些研究表明PES对延长雅思考试有积极的趋势,没有一致的或显著的不良事件报道。结论:研究结果表明,PES可能是一种有希望的辅助治疗,可以延长男性PE患者的雅思成绩。需要进一步的高质量研究,使用经过验证的患者报告的结果来阐明PES对射精控制和性满意度的影响。试验注册:研究方案在PROSPERO进行前瞻性注册(ID: CRD42024551360)。
{"title":"Peripheral electrical stimulation for premature ejaculation: a systematic review of clinical studies.","authors":"Fateme Tahmasbi, Alireza Rahimi-Mamaghani, Farzin Soleimanzadeh, Omid Sedigh, Sarvin Sanaie, Mohsen Mohammad-Rahimi","doi":"10.1177/17562872251382317","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251382317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Premature ejaculation (PE) is a common sexual disorder characterized by a lack of voluntary control over ejaculation. Current treatments often fail to produce consistently satisfactory outcomes. Peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) is an emerging neuromodulation technique that applies electrical currents to targeted body areas and has shown promise across various conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although the use of PES for PE is relatively underexplored, this study aimed to synthesize existing research to better understand its potential as a treatment option.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords. Studies were included if they investigated PES as a treatment for PE and reported outcomes such as intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) or other clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies met the eligibility criteria. Due to the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and a narrative synthesis was performed. Stimulation was applied transcutaneously in various ways, including at acupuncture points, the dorsal penile nerve, and the posterior tibial nerve. Protocols varied considerably, though commonly reported parameters included a pulse frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 µs, typically administered in 30-min sessions. Some studies lacked detailed descriptions of stimulation settings. Overall, the studies demonstrated a positive trend in favor of PES for prolonging IELT, and no consistent or significant adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that PES may be a promising adjunctive therapy for men with PE by prolonging IELT. Further high-quality research using validated patient-reported outcomes is needed to clarify the impact of PES on perceived ejaculatory control and sexual satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024551360).</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251382317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12477390/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145200776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database. 男性压力性尿失禁手术的并发症:来自大型国家数据库的尿道吊带与人工尿括约肌的比较分析。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251375528
Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.

Objectives: To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.

Methods: Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.

Results: Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), p = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all p < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.

Conclusion: AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.

背景:男性压力性尿失禁(SUI)通常是由根治性前列腺切除术或括约肌功能障碍引起的,影响生活质量。手术选择包括人工尿道括约肌(AUS)和男性尿道吊带,其风险和成本较低。了解他们的结果有助于病人护理。目的:比较男性AUS与吊带植入术术后30天的预后。设计:采用多中心数据库的回顾性队列研究。方法:使用现行程序术语(CPT)代码在国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中识别2008年至2022年间接受吊带或AUS植入的男性患者。提取并比较患者特征、术中因素和30天预后。多因素logistic回归校正了年龄、体重指数(BMI)、种族、ASA分类、麻醉技术、吸烟状况、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、糖尿病、高血压用药史、出血性疾病和慢性类固醇使用。还进行了1:1倾向评分匹配分析。结果:4498例患者中39.6%接受吊带治疗,60.4%接受AUS治疗。调整后,AUS与30天并发症的高发生率相关(OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), p = 0.012),包括手术部位感染(OR 2.19)、总体感染(OR 1.84)、种植体并发症(OR 4.08)、泌尿生殖系统并发症(OR 2.31)、意外再手术(OR 2.04)、Clavien-Dindo I-II级(OR 1.58)和III级并发症(OR 2.10)、住院时间延长(OR 4.66-5.71;结论:与男性尿道吊带置入相比,AUS植入术术后30天并发症发生率较高。这些结果可以指导外科医生对两种手术的短期并发症率进行围手术期咨询,但需要进一步的研究来评估长期结果。
{"title":"Complications of stress urinary incontinence surgery in men: a comparative analysis of urethral sling versus artificial urinary sphincter from a large national database.","authors":"Towfik Sebai, Marwan Zein, Yara Ghandour, Baraa AlJardali, Hani Tamim, Albert El Hajj","doi":"10.1177/17562872251375528","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251375528","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men, often due to radical prostatectomy or sphincter deficiency, impacts quality of life. Surgical options include artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and male urethral slings, valued for lower risks and cost. Understanding their outcomes aids in patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare 30-day postoperative outcomes in AUS versus sling implantation in males.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using a multicenter database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male patients who underwent sling or AUS implantation between 2008 and 2022 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were extracted and compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), race, ASA classification, anesthesia technique, smoking status, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, hypertension requiring medication, bleeding disorders, and chronic steroid use. A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,498 patients, 39.6% received slings and 60.4% AUS. After adjustment, AUS was associated with higher odds of 30-day complications (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.02), <i>p</i> = 0.012), including surgical site infections (OR 2.19), overall infections (OR 1.84), implant complications (OR 4.08), genitourinary complications (OR 2.31), unplanned reoperation (OR 2.04), Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II (OR 1.58) and Grade III complications (OR 2.10), and prolonged hospital stay (OR 4.66-5.71; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The 1:1 matched analysis largely supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AUS implantation is associated with higher 30-day postoperative complication rates compared to male urethral sling placement. These results may guide surgeons in their perioperative counseling regarding the short-term complication rates of both procedures, but further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251375528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12457759/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating repeat transurethral resection after en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. 非肌性浸润性膀胱癌整体切除后经尿道重复切除的疗效评价。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251367555
Jincong Li, Yuxuan Song, Rui Chen, Hanlin Gao, Yang Liu, Yun Peng, Jilin Wu, Shicong Lai, Yiqing Du, Caipeng Qin, Tao Xu

Objective: Many studies have stressed the necessity of repeat transurethral resection (reTURB) following the initial conventional transurethral resection of the bladder for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. However, there have been few studies focusing on the role of reTURB after en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) for NMIBC by far. This study aimed to evaluate whether reTURB can be avoided after ERBT.

Materials and methods: We conducted research in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 14, 2024, to identify studies on the reTURB after initial ERBT. For data conversion and the combined calculation of the incidence rate, we utilized R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Cochrane Review Manager 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) along with the double arcsine method. This systematic review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number 1082989.

Results: A total of 17 studies involving 1051 participants were included. The rates of residual tumor and tumor upstaging detected by reTURB or cystoscopy after ERBT were 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4%-16%) and 0% (95% CI = 0%-1%). No statistically significant positive effect of reTURB after initial ERBT was exhibited in recurrence-free survival (RFS), tumor recurrence, and progression. The pooled hazard ratios of 1-year and 5-year RFS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.41-1.44, p = 0.41) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.58-1.20, p = 0.33). The pooled odds ratio of progression and recurrence were 1.13 (95% CI = 0.53-2.41, p = 0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI = 0.53-1.16, p = 0.23).

Conclusion: ERBT can successfully regulate the rate of tumor upstaging and residual tumor to an acceptable level. For patients with NMIBC, subsequent reTURB may not be required following the initial ERBT.

目的:许多研究强调非肌性浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者在首次常规经尿道膀胱切除术后进行重复经尿道膀胱切除术(reTURB)的必要性。然而,到目前为止,关于膀胱肿瘤全切除(ERBT)后肿瘤复发在NMIBC中的作用的研究很少。本研究旨在评估ERBT后是否可以避免复发。材料和方法:截至2024年11月14日,我们在PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE和Cochrane Library进行了研究,以确定首次ERBT后的回报研究。在数据转换和发病率联合计算方面,我们使用了R软件(R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria)和Cochrane Review Manager 5.4 (the Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK),并采用了双反正弦法。本系统评价方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)注册,编号为1082989。结果:共纳入17项研究,涉及1051名受试者。ERBT术后复查或膀胱镜检出肿瘤残留率为9%(95%可信区间(CI) = 4%-16%)和0% (95% CI = 0%-1%)。在无复发生存(RFS)、肿瘤复发和进展方面,初始ERBT后的复发无统计学意义的积极影响。1年和5年RFS的合并风险比分别为0.77 (95% CI = 0.41-1.44, p = 0.41)和0.83 (95% CI = 0.58-1.20, p = 0.33)。进展和复发的合并优势比分别为1.13 (95% CI = 0.53-2.41, p = 0.75)和0.78 (95% CI = 0.53-1.16, p = 0.23)。结论:ERBT能有效地将肿瘤上分期率和肿瘤残留率控制在可接受的水平。对于NMIBC患者,在初始ERBT后可能不需要后续的turb。
{"title":"Evaluating repeat transurethral resection after en bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.","authors":"Jincong Li, Yuxuan Song, Rui Chen, Hanlin Gao, Yang Liu, Yun Peng, Jilin Wu, Shicong Lai, Yiqing Du, Caipeng Qin, Tao Xu","doi":"10.1177/17562872251367555","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251367555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many studies have stressed the necessity of repeat transurethral resection (reTURB) following the initial conventional transurethral resection of the bladder for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. However, there have been few studies focusing on the role of reTURB after en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) for NMIBC by far. This study aimed to evaluate whether reTURB can be avoided after ERBT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted research in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 14, 2024, to identify studies on the reTURB after initial ERBT. For data conversion and the combined calculation of the incidence rate, we utilized R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and Cochrane Review Manager 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) along with the double arcsine method. This systematic review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number 1082989.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies involving 1051 participants were included. The rates of residual tumor and tumor upstaging detected by reTURB or cystoscopy after ERBT were 9% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4%-16%) and 0% (95% CI = 0%-1%). No statistically significant positive effect of reTURB after initial ERBT was exhibited in recurrence-free survival (RFS), tumor recurrence, and progression. The pooled hazard ratios of 1-year and 5-year RFS were 0.77 (95% CI = 0.41-1.44, <i>p</i> = 0.41) and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.58-1.20, <i>p</i> = 0.33). The pooled odds ratio of progression and recurrence were 1.13 (95% CI = 0.53-2.41, <i>p</i> = 0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI = 0.53-1.16, <i>p</i> = 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERBT can successfully regulate the rate of tumor upstaging and residual tumor to an acceptable level. For patients with NMIBC, subsequent reTURB may not be required following the initial ERBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251367555"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415345/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145030549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relative performance of balloon dilatators and metallic telescopic dilatators for the establishment of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts: a single-center, retrospective study. 球囊扩张器与金属伸缩扩张器在超声引导下经皮肾镜取石管中的相对性能:一项单中心回顾性研究。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-09-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251372210
Shangjing Liu, Yuchen Qian, Zhenguo Wang, Qingzuo Liu, Peng Zhang, Yining Zhao, Jitao Wu

Purpose: This study was developed to compare the clinical benefits associated with the use of balloon dilatators to those of metallic telescopic dilatators when used for the establishment of tracts in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Materials and methods: This was a single-center retrospective study enrolling patients with urolithiasis who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy at Yuhuangding Hospital between 2011 and 2021. Patients were grouped based on the method used to establish percutaneous renal tracts, including balloon and metallic telescopic groups. The primary outcomes were overshooting rate, failure of access rate, and the efficiency of stone removal, while secondary outcomes included safety and economic benefits.

Results: In total, 2269 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 1222 (54%) and 1047 (46%) were in the balloon and metallic telescopic groups, respectively. Comparisons between the two groups did not reveal any superiority of the balloon group relative to the metallic telescopic group in overshooting rate (adjusted rate ratio (RR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-1.27), failure of access rate (adjusted RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52-1.16) and stone removal efficiency (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13). However, a significantly lower postoperative hemoglobin reduction value was observed in the balloon group relative to the metallic telescopic group (adjusted beta coefficient ratio: 7.19, 95% CI, 5.68-8.70). Balloon dilatator use was associated with better transfusion, embolization, surgical time, and hospital stay outcomes, whereas it was inferior in terms of costs.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy, balloon dilatator use for the establishment of percutaneous tracts is not superior to metallic telescopic dilatator use in terms of overshooting and failure of access and stone removal rates, but is superior in terms of the control of bleeding.

目的:本研究旨在比较在超声引导下经皮肾镜取石患者中使用球囊扩张器与金属伸缩扩张器建立尿路的临床益处。材料和方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入2011年至2021年间在玉皇顶医院接受超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术的尿石症患者。根据建立经皮肾道的方法对患者进行分组,包括球囊组和金属伸缩组。主要指标为超调率、通路失败率和结石清除效率,次要指标为安全性和经济效益。结果:共纳入2269例患者,其中球囊组1222例(54%),金属套筒组1047例(46%)。两组比较未发现球囊组在超冲率上优于金属套筒组(校正率比(RR), 0.97;95%可信区间(CI), 0.73-1.27),通路失败率(校正RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52-1.16)和结石清除效率(校正RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13)。然而,气囊组术后血红蛋白降低值明显低于金属伸缩组(校正β系数比:7.19,95% CI, 5.68-8.70)。球囊扩张器的使用与更好的输血、栓塞、手术时间和住院结果相关,而在成本方面则较差。结论:在超声引导下经皮肾镜取石患者中,使用球囊扩张器建立经皮肾道在过冲、入路失败及取石率方面并不优于金属套筒扩张器,但在控制出血方面优于金属套筒扩张器。
{"title":"The relative performance of balloon dilatators and metallic telescopic dilatators for the establishment of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy tracts: a single-center, retrospective study.","authors":"Shangjing Liu, Yuchen Qian, Zhenguo Wang, Qingzuo Liu, Peng Zhang, Yining Zhao, Jitao Wu","doi":"10.1177/17562872251372210","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251372210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was developed to compare the clinical benefits associated with the use of balloon dilatators to those of metallic telescopic dilatators when used for the establishment of tracts in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study enrolling patients with urolithiasis who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy at Yuhuangding Hospital between 2011 and 2021. Patients were grouped based on the method used to establish percutaneous renal tracts, including balloon and metallic telescopic groups. The primary outcomes were overshooting rate, failure of access rate, and the efficiency of stone removal, while secondary outcomes included safety and economic benefits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 2269 patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 1222 (54%) and 1047 (46%) were in the balloon and metallic telescopic groups, respectively. Comparisons between the two groups did not reveal any superiority of the balloon group relative to the metallic telescopic group in overshooting rate (adjusted rate ratio (RR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-1.27), failure of access rate (adjusted RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.52-1.16) and stone removal efficiency (adjusted RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.94-1.13). However, a significantly lower postoperative hemoglobin reduction value was observed in the balloon group relative to the metallic telescopic group (adjusted beta coefficient ratio: 7.19, 95% CI, 5.68-8.70). Balloon dilatator use was associated with better transfusion, embolization, surgical time, and hospital stay outcomes, whereas it was inferior in terms of costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy, balloon dilatator use for the establishment of percutaneous tracts is not superior to metallic telescopic dilatator use in terms of overshooting and failure of access and stone removal rates, but is superior in terms of the control of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251372210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial intelligence and radiomics applications in adrenal lesions: a systematic review. 人工智能和放射组学在肾上腺病变中的应用:系统综述。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251352553
Matteo Ferro, Octavian Sabin Tataru, Giuseppe Carrieri, Gian Maria Busetto, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Martina Maggi, Felice Crocetto, Biagio Barone, Francesco Del Giudice, Michele Marchioni, Daniela Terracciano, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Pasquale Ditonno, Raul Gherasim, Ciprian Todea-Moga, Giuseppe Fallara, Marco Tozzi, Antonio Cioffi, Roberto Bianchi, Alessio Digiacomo, Alessandro Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Luigi Schips, Bernardo Rocco

Background: Adrenal lesions, often incidentally detected, present diagnostic challenges in distinguishing benign from malignant or hormonally active lesions. Conventional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI)) has limitations, driving interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics for enhanced accuracy.

Objectives: To systematically evaluate AI and radiomics applications in adrenal lesion characterization, focusing on diagnostic performance, methodologies, and clinical utility.

Design: PRISMA-guided systematic review of studies published up to June 2024.

Data sources and methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using the keywords: adrenal lesions, AI, radiomics, and machine learning. Inclusion followed PICO criteria: patients with indeterminate lesions, AI/radiomics interventions, comparisons to standard diagnostics, and diagnostic accuracy. Two reviewers screened studies, resolving discrepancies via consensus. Eleven retrospective studies (996 patients) met eligibility.

Results: CT-based radiomics (eight studies) achieved a mean AUC of 0.88 (range: 0.84-0.94) in differentiating benign/malignant or functional/non-functional lesions. Top-performing models identified aldosterone-producing adenomas (AUC: 0.99). MRI-based radiomics (three studies) yielded mean AUC: 0.82 (0.72-0.92), with test-set performance declines (e.g., AUC: 0.72) suggesting overfitting. Nuclear medicine (four studies) demonstrated that hybrid 18F-FDG PET/CT models (SUVmax + texture features) achieved an AUC of 0.97 for metastatic versus benign lesions. AI applications extended to intraoperative navigation (AUC: 0.93) and prognostic prediction.

Conclusion: CT-based radiomics outperformed MRI, aligning with guidelines favoring CT for adrenal assessment. AI-enhanced models show promise in refining diagnostics and reducing invasive procedures. However, retrospective designs, small cohorts, and protocol variability limit generalizability. Future work requires multicenter collaboration, standardized protocols, and prospective validation to translate AI/radiomics into clinical practice.

背景:肾上腺病变通常是偶然发现的,在区分良性和恶性或激素活性病变方面存在诊断挑战。传统成像(计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像(CT/MRI))具有局限性,这推动了人们对人工智能(AI)和放射组学的兴趣,以提高准确性。目的:系统评估人工智能和放射组学在肾上腺病变表征中的应用,重点是诊断性能、方法和临床应用。设计:对截至2024年6月发表的prisma指导的研究进行系统评价。数据来源和方法:检索关键词:肾上腺病变,人工智能,放射组学,机器学习,PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science,谷歌Scholar。纳入遵循PICO标准:病变不确定的患者,人工智能/放射组学干预,与标准诊断的比较,诊断准确性。两位审稿人筛选研究,通过共识解决差异。11项回顾性研究(996例患者)符合资格。结果:基于ct的放射组学(8项研究)在鉴别良/恶性或功能性/非功能性病变方面的平均AUC为0.88(范围:0.84-0.94)。表现最好的模型鉴定出醛固酮分泌腺瘤(AUC: 0.99)。基于mri的放射组学(三项研究)得出的平均AUC为0.82(0.72-0.92),测试集性能下降(例如AUC: 0.72)表明过拟合。核医学(四项研究)表明,混合18F-FDG PET/CT模型(SUVmax +纹理特征)对转移性病变与良性病变的AUC为0.97。人工智能应用扩展到术中导航(AUC: 0.93)和预后预测。结论:基于CT的放射组学优于MRI,与偏向CT的肾上腺评估指南一致。人工智能增强模型有望改善诊断和减少侵入性手术。然而,回顾性设计、小队列和方案可变性限制了通用性。未来的工作需要多中心合作、标准化协议和前瞻性验证,以将人工智能/放射组学转化为临床实践。
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and radiomics applications in adrenal lesions: a systematic review.","authors":"Matteo Ferro, Octavian Sabin Tataru, Giuseppe Carrieri, Gian Maria Busetto, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Martina Maggi, Felice Crocetto, Biagio Barone, Francesco Del Giudice, Michele Marchioni, Daniela Terracciano, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Pasquale Ditonno, Raul Gherasim, Ciprian Todea-Moga, Giuseppe Fallara, Marco Tozzi, Antonio Cioffi, Roberto Bianchi, Alessio Digiacomo, Alessandro Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Luigi Schips, Bernardo Rocco","doi":"10.1177/17562872251352553","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251352553","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adrenal lesions, often incidentally detected, present diagnostic challenges in distinguishing benign from malignant or hormonally active lesions. Conventional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI)) has limitations, driving interest in artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics for enhanced accuracy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically evaluate AI and radiomics applications in adrenal lesion characterization, focusing on diagnostic performance, methodologies, and clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>PRISMA-guided systematic review of studies published up to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched using the keywords: <i>adrenal lesions, AI, radiomics</i>, and <i>machine learning</i>. Inclusion followed PICO criteria: patients with indeterminate lesions, AI/radiomics interventions, comparisons to standard diagnostics, and diagnostic accuracy. Two reviewers screened studies, resolving discrepancies via consensus. Eleven retrospective studies (996 patients) met eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CT-based radiomics (eight studies) achieved a mean AUC of 0.88 (range: 0.84-0.94) in differentiating benign/malignant or functional/non-functional lesions. Top-performing models identified aldosterone-producing adenomas (AUC: 0.99). MRI-based radiomics (three studies) yielded mean AUC: 0.82 (0.72-0.92), with test-set performance declines (e.g., AUC: 0.72) suggesting overfitting. Nuclear medicine (four studies) demonstrated that hybrid 18F-FDG PET/CT models (SUVmax + texture features) achieved an AUC of 0.97 for metastatic versus benign lesions. AI applications extended to intraoperative navigation (AUC: 0.93) and prognostic prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-based radiomics outperformed MRI, aligning with guidelines favoring CT for adrenal assessment. AI-enhanced models show promise in refining diagnostics and reducing invasive procedures. However, retrospective designs, small cohorts, and protocol variability limit generalizability. Future work requires multicenter collaboration, standardized protocols, and prospective validation to translate AI/radiomics into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251352553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319203/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: comparison of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal diversion. 成人神经源性下尿路功能障碍的机器人辅助下天膀胱切除术和增强膀胱成形术:体外与体内转移的比较。
IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/17562872251359339
Neha Sihra, Pierre Lecoanet, Alexandre Dubois, Juan Penafiel, Camille Haudebert, Charles Mazeaud, Adil Mellouki, Juliette Hascoet, Younes Ahallal, Andrea Manunta, Imad Bentellis, Benoit Peyronnet

We aim to explore the feasibility of robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty (RA-SCAC) for the management of adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and to compare the functional and surgical outcomes of an intracorporeal and extracorporeal approach. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Data was collected on age, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, type and duration of neurological disease, previous abdominal surgery and renal function. Bladder diary, urodynamics and validated symptom score results were recorded at baseline and repeated postoperatively. Intraoperative details included type of diversion, concomitant surgery, duration of surgery, blood loss and conversion to open. Postoperative surgical recovery was also reviewed. The primary endpoint was the rate of major postoperative complications defined as any complication Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 occurring within the first 90 days postoperatively. There were 26 patients in total; 7 performed extracorporeally and 19 intracorporeally. Mean age was 41.5, mean BMI 24.4 and majority were ASA score 2 (61.5%). Twelve (46.1%) patients had spinal cord injury and 6 (23.1%) spina bifida. Seven (26.9%) had a concomitant procedure including bladder neck artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) insertion, bladder neck fascial sling or creation of a continent catheterisable channel. The surgical outcomes were analysed separately for those that had RA-SCAC only versus RA-SCAC with a concomitant procedure. The operative time was shorter in the intracorporeal group, and the length of stay was similar in both groups. The total number of major postoperative complications was low (n = 3; 11.5%). All urodynamic parameters significantly improved at 6 months in the intracorporeal group. Median number of urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h decreased significantly in both groups at 3 months but the continence status and ICIQ-UI SF demonstrated statistical significance in the intracorporeal group only. In conclusion, robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty is feasible in adult neurological patients, favouring an intracorporeal approach.

我们的目的是探讨机器人辅助的肛上膀胱切除术和增强膀胱成形术(RA-SCAC)治疗成人神经源性下尿路功能障碍的可行性,并比较体内和体外方法的功能和手术效果。我们对所有接受机器人辅助的表上膀胱切除术和增强膀胱成形术的患者进行了回顾性研究。数据包括年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、神经系统疾病的类型和持续时间、既往腹部手术和肾功能。膀胱日记,尿动力学和验证症状评分结果记录在基线和术后重复。术中细节包括转流类型、伴随手术、手术时间、出血量和转开。同时也回顾了术后的手术恢复情况。主要终点是术后主要并发症的发生率,定义为术后90天内发生的任何并发症Clavien-Dindo分级≥3。共26例;体外手术7例,体内手术19例。平均年龄41.5岁,平均BMI为24.4,多数为ASA 2分(61.5%)。脊髓损伤12例(46.1%),脊柱裂6例(23.1%)。7例(26.9%)患者同时行膀胱颈人工尿括约肌(AUS)置入、膀胱颈筋膜悬吊或建立尿路等手术。分别分析单纯RA-SCAC与RA-SCAC合并手术的手术结果。体内组手术时间较短,两组住院时间相近。术后主要并发症总数较低(n = 3;11.5%)。体内组6个月时所有尿动力学参数均显著改善。3个月时,两组患者每24小时尿失禁发作的中位数均显著下降,但尿失禁状况和ICIQ-UI SF仅在体内组有统计学意义。综上所述,机器人辅助的眶上膀胱切除术和增强膀胱成形术在成人神经系统患者中是可行的,更倾向于体内入路。
{"title":"Robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty for adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: comparison of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal diversion.","authors":"Neha Sihra, Pierre Lecoanet, Alexandre Dubois, Juan Penafiel, Camille Haudebert, Charles Mazeaud, Adil Mellouki, Juliette Hascoet, Younes Ahallal, Andrea Manunta, Imad Bentellis, Benoit Peyronnet","doi":"10.1177/17562872251359339","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17562872251359339","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aim to explore the feasibility of robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty (RA-SCAC) for the management of adult neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and to compare the functional and surgical outcomes of an intracorporeal and extracorporeal approach. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty was performed. Data was collected on age, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, type and duration of neurological disease, previous abdominal surgery and renal function. Bladder diary, urodynamics and validated symptom score results were recorded at baseline and repeated postoperatively. Intraoperative details included type of diversion, concomitant surgery, duration of surgery, blood loss and conversion to open. Postoperative surgical recovery was also reviewed. The primary endpoint was the rate of major postoperative complications defined as any complication Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 occurring within the first 90 days postoperatively. There were 26 patients in total; 7 performed extracorporeally and 19 intracorporeally. Mean age was 41.5, mean BMI 24.4 and majority were ASA score 2 (61.5%). Twelve (46.1%) patients had spinal cord injury and 6 (23.1%) spina bifida. Seven (26.9%) had a concomitant procedure including bladder neck artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) insertion, bladder neck fascial sling or creation of a continent catheterisable channel. The surgical outcomes were analysed separately for those that had RA-SCAC only versus RA-SCAC with a concomitant procedure. The operative time was shorter in the intracorporeal group, and the length of stay was similar in both groups. The total number of major postoperative complications was low (n = 3; 11.5%). All urodynamic parameters significantly improved at 6 months in the intracorporeal group. Median number of urinary incontinence episodes per 24 h decreased significantly in both groups at 3 months but the continence status and ICIQ-UI SF demonstrated statistical significance in the intracorporeal group only. In conclusion, robot-assisted supratrigonal cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty is feasible in adult neurological patients, favouring an intracorporeal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":23010,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Urology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562872251359339"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304641/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144745129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1