首页 > 最新文献

Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Real-world insights into safety, tolerability, and predictive factors of adverse drug reactions in treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with pirfenidone and nintedanib. 吡非尼酮和尼达尼布治疗特发性肺纤维化的安全性、耐受性和药物不良反应预测因素的实际见解。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251341645
Alessio Provenzani, Daniele Leonardi Vinci, Miriam Alaimo, Salvatore Di Maria, Fabio Tuzzolino, Gaetano Floridia, Roberta Di Stefano, Anna Carollo, Adriana Callari, Piera Polidori, Patrizio Vitulo

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, life-threatening lung disease with a global incidence of 0.09-1.30 per 10,000 individuals. Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the approved treatments for IPF.

Objectives: This study evaluated the real-world safety and tolerability profiles of pirfenidone and nintedanib in IPF patients treated at the Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT). A comparative analysis was conducted based on the number, types, and severity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to identify potential predictors of treatment discontinuation or ADR onset based on patient characteristics.

Design: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 531 IPF patients treated at IRCCS ISMETT with either pirfenidone or nintedanib.

Methods: Eligible patients were selected based on the logged monthly dispensations provided by the pharmacy service for both therapies. Covariates were extracted from electronic medical records (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, comorbidities, forced vital capacity (FVC) %, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) %, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), polytherapy, oxygen therapy, drug switch, etc.). ADRs were categorized by severity and follow-up status, and further classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, specifying the Preferred Terms and the related System Organ Classes. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and univariate and multiple logistic regression identified potential risk factors for ADR onset. Backward Stepwise logistic regression (BSLR) was used to determine independent variables associated with ADR occurrence.

Results: The nintedanib group had more frequent ADRs related to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, with nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and weight loss as the most common. The pirfenidone group had more ADRs related to skin, nervous system, and vascular disorders, such as rash, nausea, dizziness, and blood pressure imbalances. Significant baseline differences between groups included age, smoking status, FVC (%), DLCO (%), and 6-MWT, with the nintedanib cohort showing worse baseline characteristics. A total of 450 ADRs were reported: 59.6% for nintedanib and 40.4% for pirfenidone. Independent variables that significantly increased the likelihood of experiencing ADR were drug change, treatment type, gender, and age.

Conclusion: Identifying ADR predictors is essential for personalizing treatment strategies. Both pirfenidone and nintedanib are crucial in managing IPF, highlighting the need for further research to optimize personalized therapies and patient outcomes.

背景:特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种慢性、进行性、危及生命的肺部疾病,全球发病率为0.09-1.30 / 10,000人。吡非尼酮和尼达尼布是IPF批准的治疗方法。目的:本研究评估了吡非尼酮和尼达尼布在地中海移植和高级专科治疗研究所(IRCCS ISMETT)治疗的IPF患者的实际安全性和耐受性。根据药物不良反应(ADR)的数量、类型和严重程度进行比较分析,并根据患者特征确定停药或ADR发生的潜在预测因素。设计:对531例在IRCCS ISMETT接受吡非尼酮或尼达尼治疗的IPF患者进行回顾性观察研究。方法:根据药房每月提供的两种治疗方法的配药记录选择符合条件的患者。从电子病历中提取协变量(年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟史、合并症、用力肺活量(FVC) %、肺一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO) %、6分钟步行试验(6-MWT)、综合治疗、氧疗、药物切换等)。根据严重程度和随访状态对adr进行分类,并根据《监管活动医学词典》进一步分类,指定首选术语和相关的系统器官类别。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,单因素和多因素logistic回归确定了ADR发生的潜在危险因素。采用后向逐步逻辑回归(BSLR)确定与ADR发生相关的自变量。结果:尼达尼布组与胃肠道和肝胆系统疾病相关的不良反应更为频繁,以恶心、腹泻、厌食和体重减轻最为常见。吡非尼酮组有更多与皮肤、神经系统和血管疾病相关的不良反应,如皮疹、恶心、头晕和血压失衡。组间的显著基线差异包括年龄、吸烟状况、FVC(%)、DLCO(%)和6-MWT,其中尼达尼布组显示出更差的基线特征。共有450例不良反应报告:尼达尼布为59.6%,吡非尼酮为40.4%。显著增加发生ADR可能性的独立变量是药物变化、治疗类型、性别和年龄。结论:确定不良反应的预测因素对于制定个性化的治疗策略至关重要。吡非尼酮和尼达尼布在治疗IPF中都是至关重要的,强调需要进一步研究以优化个性化治疗和患者预后。
{"title":"Real-world insights into safety, tolerability, and predictive factors of adverse drug reactions in treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with pirfenidone and nintedanib.","authors":"Alessio Provenzani, Daniele Leonardi Vinci, Miriam Alaimo, Salvatore Di Maria, Fabio Tuzzolino, Gaetano Floridia, Roberta Di Stefano, Anna Carollo, Adriana Callari, Piera Polidori, Patrizio Vitulo","doi":"10.1177/20420986251341645","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20420986251341645","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, life-threatening lung disease with a global incidence of 0.09-1.30 per 10,000 individuals. Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the approved treatments for IPF.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the real-world safety and tolerability profiles of pirfenidone and nintedanib in IPF patients treated at the Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT). A comparative analysis was conducted based on the number, types, and severity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to identify potential predictors of treatment discontinuation or ADR onset based on patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted on 531 IPF patients treated at IRCCS ISMETT with either pirfenidone or nintedanib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were selected based on the logged monthly dispensations provided by the pharmacy service for both therapies. Covariates were extracted from electronic medical records (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, comorbidities, forced vital capacity (FVC) %, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) %, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), polytherapy, oxygen therapy, drug switch, etc.). ADRs were categorized by severity and follow-up status, and further classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, specifying the Preferred Terms and the related System Organ Classes. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, and univariate and multiple logistic regression identified potential risk factors for ADR onset. Backward Stepwise logistic regression (BSLR) was used to determine independent variables associated with ADR occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nintedanib group had more frequent ADRs related to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, with nausea, diarrhea, anorexia, and weight loss as the most common. The pirfenidone group had more ADRs related to skin, nervous system, and vascular disorders, such as rash, nausea, dizziness, and blood pressure imbalances. Significant baseline differences between groups included age, smoking status, FVC (%), DLCO (%), and 6-MWT, with the nintedanib cohort showing worse baseline characteristics. A total of 450 ADRs were reported: 59.6% for nintedanib and 40.4% for pirfenidone. Independent variables that significantly increased the likelihood of experiencing ADR were drug change, treatment type, gender, and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying ADR predictors is essential for personalizing treatment strategies. Both pirfenidone and nintedanib are crucial in managing IPF, highlighting the need for further research to optimize personalized therapies and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251341645"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144174923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacist support in the entry of blood drug concentration test order avoids vancomycin-induced kidney injury. 药师支持进入血药浓度检验顺序,避免万古霉素所致肾损伤。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251339580
Naoki Yoshikawa, Chiaki Miyata, Hidehiko Koreeda, Shuichi Nakahara, Yuki Matsusaki, Yusei Yamada, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai, Ryuji Ikeda

Background: Task shifting and sharing have been proposed as strategies to address healthcare staffing shortages and improve patient outcomes. In emergency and intensive care medicine, pharmacist interventions have shown potential to reduce medication errors and improve care quality. However, the precise benefits of pharmacist support in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for emergency center inpatients require further verification.

Objective: To determine the contribution of pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders to patient safety during anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) drug administration in the emergency and critical care center, and investigate the association between this support and the frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury.

Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes 2 years before and 2 years after implementing pharmacist support for blood concentration test order entry.

Methods: Patients receiving intravenous vancomycin with blood concentrations measured at the emergency center were included. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding. The primary outcome was the change in frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury before and after pharmacist support implementation.

Results: Pharmacist support significantly reduced the frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury (from 6.5% to 0.0%, p = 0.043) and shortened time to first TDM implementation (p = 0.019) in the overall cohort. Similar significant reductions were observed in the propensity score matched cohort (from 11.9% to 0.0%, p = 0.013).

Conclusion: Pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders significantly reduced vancomycin-induced kidney injury frequency and shortened time to first TDM, enhancing patient safety during anti-MRSA medication administration in the emergency and critical care center. This task-shifting approach demonstrates clear benefits for patient care and physician workload.

背景:任务转移和共享已被提出作为解决医疗人员短缺和改善患者预后的策略。在急诊和重症监护医学中,药剂师的干预已显示出减少用药错误和提高护理质量的潜力。然而,药师支持对急诊中心住院患者治疗性药物监测(TDM)的确切益处需要进一步验证。目的:了解急诊重症监护中心抗甲氧西林耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)给药过程中,药师进入血药浓度检测单的支持对患者安全的贡献,并探讨药师的支持与万古霉素肾损伤发生频率的关系。设计:单中心回顾性队列研究,比较实施药师支持血液浓度检测单输入前和后2年的结果。方法:纳入在急救中心测血药浓度并接受静脉注射万古霉素的患者。倾向评分匹配用于最小化混淆。主要观察结果是在实施药师支持前后万古霉素引起的肾损伤发生频率的变化。结果:在整个队列中,药师支持显著降低了万古霉素所致肾损伤的发生率(从6.5%降至0.0%,p = 0.043),缩短了首次实施TDM的时间(p = 0.019)。在倾向评分匹配的队列中也观察到类似的显著降低(从11.9%降至0.0%,p = 0.013)。结论:药师支持进入血药浓度试验单,可显著降低万古霉素所致肾损伤发生率,缩短首次TDM时间,提高患者在急危重症抗mrsa用药过程中的安全性。这种任务转移方法对病人护理和医生工作量有明显的好处。
{"title":"Pharmacist support in the entry of blood drug concentration test order avoids vancomycin-induced kidney injury.","authors":"Naoki Yoshikawa, Chiaki Miyata, Hidehiko Koreeda, Shuichi Nakahara, Yuki Matsusaki, Yusei Yamada, Takehiko Nagano, Hidenobu Ochiai, Ryuji Ikeda","doi":"10.1177/20420986251339580","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20420986251339580","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Task shifting and sharing have been proposed as strategies to address healthcare staffing shortages and improve patient outcomes. In emergency and intensive care medicine, pharmacist interventions have shown potential to reduce medication errors and improve care quality. However, the precise benefits of pharmacist support in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for emergency center inpatients require further verification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the contribution of pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders to patient safety during anti-methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) drug administration in the emergency and critical care center, and investigate the association between this support and the frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing outcomes 2 years before and 2 years after implementing pharmacist support for blood concentration test order entry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving intravenous vancomycin with blood concentrations measured at the emergency center were included. Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding. The primary outcome was the change in frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury before and after pharmacist support implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacist support significantly reduced the frequency of vancomycin-induced kidney injury (from 6.5% to 0.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.043) and shortened time to first TDM implementation (<i>p</i> = 0.019) in the overall cohort. Similar significant reductions were observed in the propensity score matched cohort (from 11.9% to 0.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist support in entering blood drug concentration test orders significantly reduced vancomycin-induced kidney injury frequency and shortened time to first TDM, enhancing patient safety during anti-MRSA medication administration in the emergency and critical care center. This task-shifting approach demonstrates clear benefits for patient care and physician workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251339580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103665/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144143689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of electronic distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications by the Danish Medicines Agency: a survey study of physicians' experiences and preferences. 丹麦药品管理局实施直接医疗保健专业通讯的电子分发:一项关于医生经验和偏好的调查研究。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251333911
Per Sindahl, Mathias Møllebæk, Helga Gardarsdottir, Marie Louise De Bruin, Christine Erikstrup Hallgreen, Marianne Hald Clemmensen

Background: The efficient distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) is crucial for ensuring healthcare providers promptly receive important new safety information.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the electronic distribution of DHPCs by the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA) and to assess how future safety communication can be improved.

Design: We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey among Danish physicians using a self-administered questionnaire.

Methods: DKMA sends DHPCs to healthcare professionals via an electronic mailbox called e-Boks which is linked to the unique personal identifier. To evaluate DKMA's distribution of DHPCs, participants were asked about awareness, frequency and barriers of reading, preferred distribution channel and overall satisfaction. To further identify potential improvements, respondents were asked about general preferences regarding sender and channels of safety information in addition to which information sources they use to keep up-to-date.

Results: A total of 2238 physicians completed the survey corresponding to a response rate of 26% based on the total target population. The total awareness was 81%. Compared to previous research, awareness of GPs increased from 66% to 82%, and the percentage of GPs who rarely or never read DHPCs decreased from 33% to 20%. In addition, our study revealed a preference for receiving DHPCs electronically through e-Boks as opposed to workplace-delivered postal letters, and a preference for the DKMA over pharmaceutical companies as the sender of DHPCs. One-third of the respondents were either 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with the current solution. A professional mailbox and point-of-care alerts when prescribing may complement the primary distribution channel to strengthen the uptake. Additionally, existing information sources already frequented by the target group may be used to communicate safety information.

Conclusion: The DKMA's electronic distribution of DHPCs suggests an improvement and may serve as inspiration for other agencies. However, the considerable dissatisfaction calls for further improvements.

背景:直接医疗保健专业通信(dhpc)的有效分发对于确保医疗保健提供者及时接收重要的新安全信息至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估丹麦药品管理局(DKMA)对dhpc电子分发的实施情况,并评估如何改进未来的安全沟通。设计:我们在丹麦医生中进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查,使用了一份自我管理的问卷。方法:DKMA通过一个名为e- books的电子邮箱将dhpc发送给医疗保健专业人员,该电子邮箱与唯一个人标识符相关联。为了评估DKMA对dhpc的分发情况,参与者被问及对dhpc的认识、阅读频率和障碍、首选分发渠道和总体满意度。为了进一步确定潜在的改进,受访者被问及关于发送者和安全信息渠道的一般偏好,以及他们使用哪些信息来源来保持最新。结果:共有2238名医生完成了调查,以总目标人群为基础的应答率为26%。总知晓率为81%。与之前的研究相比,全科医生的认知度从66%增加到82%,很少或从不阅读dhpc的全科医生比例从33%下降到20%。此外,我们的研究显示,人们更倾向于通过电子书接收dhpc,而不是通过工作场所邮寄信件,并且DKMA比制药公司更倾向于作为dhpc的发送者。三分之一的受访者对目前的解决方案“不满意”或“非常不满意”。专业邮箱和处方时的护理点警报可以补充主要分销渠道,以加强吸收。此外,目标群体经常使用的现有信息源可用于交流安全信息。结论:DKMA对DHPCs的电子分发进行了改进,可为其他机构提供借鉴。然而,相当大的不满要求进一步改进。
{"title":"Implementation of electronic distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications by the Danish Medicines Agency: a survey study of physicians' experiences and preferences.","authors":"Per Sindahl, Mathias Møllebæk, Helga Gardarsdottir, Marie Louise De Bruin, Christine Erikstrup Hallgreen, Marianne Hald Clemmensen","doi":"10.1177/20420986251333911","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20420986251333911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficient distribution of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) is crucial for ensuring healthcare providers promptly receive important new safety information.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the electronic distribution of DHPCs by the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA) and to assess how future safety communication can be improved.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a web-based cross-sectional survey among Danish physicians using a self-administered questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DKMA sends DHPCs to healthcare professionals via an electronic mailbox called e-Boks which is linked to the unique personal identifier. To evaluate DKMA's distribution of DHPCs, participants were asked about awareness, frequency and barriers of reading, preferred distribution channel and overall satisfaction. To further identify potential improvements, respondents were asked about general preferences regarding sender and channels of safety information in addition to which information sources they use to keep up-to-date.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2238 physicians completed the survey corresponding to a response rate of 26% based on the total target population. The total awareness was 81%. Compared to previous research, awareness of GPs increased from 66% to 82%, and the percentage of GPs who rarely or never read DHPCs decreased from 33% to 20%. In addition, our study revealed a preference for receiving DHPCs electronically through e-Boks as opposed to workplace-delivered postal letters, and a preference for the DKMA over pharmaceutical companies as the sender of DHPCs. One-third of the respondents were either 'dissatisfied' or 'very dissatisfied' with the current solution. A professional mailbox and point-of-care alerts when prescribing may complement the primary distribution channel to strengthen the uptake. Additionally, existing information sources already frequented by the target group may be used to communicate safety information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DKMA's electronic distribution of DHPCs suggests an improvement and may serve as inspiration for other agencies. However, the considerable dissatisfaction calls for further improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251333911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144143687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can large language models detect drug-drug interactions leading to adverse drug reactions? 大型语言模型能检测到导致药物不良反应的药物-药物相互作用吗?
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251339358
Justine Sicard, François Montastruc, Coline Achalme, Annie Pierre Jonville-Bera, Paul Songue, Marina Babin, Thomas Soeiro, Pauline Schiro, Claire de Canecaude, Romain Barus

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDI) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Could large language models (LLMs) serve as valuable tools for pharmacovigilance specialists in detecting DDIs that lead to ADR notifications?

Objective: To compare the performance of three LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) in detecting and explaining clinically significant DDIs that have led to an ADR.

Design: Observational cross-sectional study.

Methods: We used the French National Pharmacovigilance Database to randomly extract Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of ADRs with DDI (positive controls) and ICSRs of ADRs without DDI (negative controls) registered in 2022. Interaction cases were classified by difficulty level (level-1 DDI being the easiest and level-2 DDI being the most difficult). We give each LLM (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) the same prompt and case summary. Sensitivity, specificity, and F-measure were calculated for each LLM in detecting DDIs in the case summaries.

Results: We assessed 82 ICSRs with DDIs and 22 ICSRs without DDIs. Among ICSRs with DDIs, 37 involved level-1 DDIs, and 45 involved level-2 DDIs. Correct responses were more frequent for level-1 DDIs than for level-2 DDIs. Regardless of difficulty level, ChatGPT detected 99% of DDI cases, and Claude and Gemini detected 95%. The percentage of correct answers to all DDI-related questions was 66% for ChatGPT, 68% for Claude, and 33% for Gemini. ChatGPT and Claude produced comparable results and outperformed Gemini (F-measure between 0.83 and 0.85 for ChatGPT and Claude and 0.63-0.68 for Gemini) to detect drugs involved in DDI. All exhibited low specificity (ChatGPT 0.68, Claude 0.64, and Gemini 0.36) and reported nonexistent DDIs for negative controls.

Conclusion: LLMs can detect DDIs leading to pharmacovigilance cases, but cannot reliably exclude DDIs in cases without interactions. Pharmacologists are crucial for assessing whether a DDI is implicated in an ADR.

背景:药物-药物相互作用(DDI)是引起药物不良反应(adr)的重要原因。大型语言模型(LLMs)能否作为药物警戒专家检测导致ADR通知的ddi的有价值的工具?目的:比较三种LLMs (ChatGPT、Gemini和Claude)在检测和解释导致不良反应的临床显著ddi方面的表现。设计:观察性横断面研究。方法:使用法国国家药物警戒数据库,随机抽取2022年登记的DDI(阳性对照)和不DDI(阴性对照)adr的个案安全报告(icsr)。交互案例按难度等级进行分类(1级DDI最简单,2级DDI最难)。我们给每个LLM (ChatGPT, Gemini和Claude)提供相同的提示和案例摘要。计算每个LLM在病例总结中检测ddi的敏感性、特异性和F-measure。结果:我们评估了82例有ddi的icsr和22例没有ddi的icsr。合并ddi的icsr中,一级ddi 37例,二级ddi 45例。1级ddi的正确应答频率高于2级ddi。无论难度如何,ChatGPT检测到99%的DDI病例,Claude和Gemini检测到95%。ChatGPT对所有与ddi相关的问题的正确答案百分比为66%,Claude为68%,Gemini为33%。ChatGPT和Claude产生了类似的结果,并且在检测DDI涉及的药物方面优于Gemini (ChatGPT和Claude的f测量值在0.83和0.85之间,Gemini的f测量值在0.63-0.68之间)。所有患者均表现出低特异性(ChatGPT为0.68,Claude为0.64,Gemini为0.36),阴性对照无ddi。结论:LLMs可以检测到导致药物警戒病例的ddi,但不能可靠地排除无相互作用病例的ddi。药理学家对于评估DDI是否与不良反应有关至关重要。
{"title":"Can large language models detect drug-drug interactions leading to adverse drug reactions?","authors":"Justine Sicard, François Montastruc, Coline Achalme, Annie Pierre Jonville-Bera, Paul Songue, Marina Babin, Thomas Soeiro, Pauline Schiro, Claire de Canecaude, Romain Barus","doi":"10.1177/20420986251339358","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20420986251339358","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-drug interactions (DDI) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Could large language models (LLMs) serve as valuable tools for pharmacovigilance specialists in detecting DDIs that lead to ADR notifications?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of three LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) in detecting and explaining clinically significant DDIs that have led to an ADR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the French National Pharmacovigilance Database to randomly extract Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of ADRs with DDI (positive controls) and ICSRs of ADRs without DDI (negative controls) registered in 2022. Interaction cases were classified by difficulty level (level-1 DDI being the easiest and level-2 DDI being the most difficult). We give each LLM (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude) the same prompt and case summary. Sensitivity, specificity, and <i>F</i>-measure were calculated for each LLM in detecting DDIs in the case summaries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 82 ICSRs with DDIs and 22 ICSRs without DDIs. Among ICSRs with DDIs, 37 involved level-1 DDIs, and 45 involved level-2 DDIs. Correct responses were more frequent for level-1 DDIs than for level-2 DDIs. Regardless of difficulty level, ChatGPT detected 99% of DDI cases, and Claude and Gemini detected 95%. The percentage of correct answers to all DDI-related questions was 66% for ChatGPT, 68% for Claude, and 33% for Gemini. ChatGPT and Claude produced comparable results and outperformed Gemini (<i>F</i>-measure between 0.83 and 0.85 for ChatGPT and Claude and 0.63-0.68 for Gemini) to detect drugs involved in DDI. All exhibited low specificity (ChatGPT 0.68, Claude 0.64, and Gemini 0.36) and reported nonexistent DDIs for negative controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLMs can detect DDIs leading to pharmacovigilance cases, but cannot reliably exclude DDIs in cases without interactions. Pharmacologists are crucial for assessing whether a DDI is implicated in an ADR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251339358"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084699/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144094923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug-induced fever in post-surgical patients: a systematic review of case reports. 术后患者药物性发热:病例报告的系统回顾。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251335825
Fatemeh Afra, Mona Aboutalebzadeh, Soheila Tayefeh, Sepide Javankiani, Bita Shahrami, Amir Ahmad Arabzadeh

Background: Fever is a common postoperative complication, typically caused by aseptic inflammation or infection. However, drug-induced fever (DIF) is an underdiagnosed etiology that should be considered in the differential diagnosis, especially in patients receiving complex medication regimens post-surgery.

Objectives: This systematic review aims to assess the current literature on DIF in post-surgical patients to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.

Design: Systematic review of case reports and case series.

Data sources and methods: This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We included case reports and series involving post-surgical patients with fever linked to drug administration. Studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases, as well as gray literature sources. Quality and bias were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.

Results: A total of 16 studies (14 case reports and 2 case series) involving 23 patients were included. The most frequently implicated drugs were propofol, morphine, and cephalosporins. Fever onset ranged from immediate postoperative to several days later, with varied patterns, including intermittent, remittent, and continuous fever. The majority of patients recovered after drug discontinuation, although two cases resulted in death.

Conclusion: DIF is one of the causes of postoperative fever. Early identification and cessation of the offending drug are crucial for resolving the fever and preventing severe complications. Clinicians must remain vigilant in diagnosing DIF to improve patient outcomes post-surgery.

背景:发热是一种常见的术后并发症,通常由无菌性炎症或感染引起。然而,药物性发热(DIF)是一种未被充分诊断的病因,在鉴别诊断中应予以考虑,特别是在术后接受复杂药物治疗的患者中。目的:本系统综述旨在评估目前关于术后患者DIF的文献,以提高诊断准确性和患者护理。设计:系统回顾病例报告和病例系列。数据来源和方法:本系统评价遵循PRISMA 2020指南进行。我们纳入了与给药有关的术后发热患者的病例报告和系列。研究从PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science数据库以及灰色文献来源中检索。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)关键评估工具评估质量和偏差。结果:共纳入16项研究(14例报告和2例系列),涉及23例患者。最常涉及的药物是异丙酚、吗啡和头孢菌素。从术后立即到数天后发烧,发烧模式多种多样,包括间歇性、缓解性和持续性发烧。大多数患者在停药后康复,但有两例死亡。结论:DIF是术后发热的原因之一。及早发现并停用致病性药物对于退烧和预防严重并发症至关重要。临床医生必须对诊断DIF保持警惕,以改善患者术后的预后。
{"title":"Drug-induced fever in post-surgical patients: a systematic review of case reports.","authors":"Fatemeh Afra, Mona Aboutalebzadeh, Soheila Tayefeh, Sepide Javankiani, Bita Shahrami, Amir Ahmad Arabzadeh","doi":"10.1177/20420986251335825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251335825","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fever is a common postoperative complication, typically caused by aseptic inflammation or infection. However, drug-induced fever (DIF) is an underdiagnosed etiology that should be considered in the differential diagnosis, especially in patients receiving complex medication regimens post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to assess the current literature on DIF in post-surgical patients to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review of case reports and case series.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We included case reports and series involving post-surgical patients with fever linked to drug administration. Studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases, as well as gray literature sources. Quality and bias were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 studies (14 case reports and 2 case series) involving 23 patients were included. The most frequently implicated drugs were propofol, morphine, and cephalosporins. Fever onset ranged from immediate postoperative to several days later, with varied patterns, including intermittent, remittent, and continuous fever. The majority of patients recovered after drug discontinuation, although two cases resulted in death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIF is one of the causes of postoperative fever. Early identification and cessation of the offending drug are crucial for resolving the fever and preventing severe complications. Clinicians must remain vigilant in diagnosing DIF to improve patient outcomes post-surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251335825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064892/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacovigilance analysis of small bowel bleeding associated with NSAIDs. 非甾体抗炎药相关小肠出血的药物警戒分析。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251318848
Ying-Han Deng, Meiting Jiang, Yun Chen, Hong-Bin Chen

Background: Currently, the factors influencing small bowel bleeding caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain unclear.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding and evaluate the impact of other drugs on it through a pharmacovigilance study, thereby providing valuable insights for clinical practice.

Design: Data on NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding were retrospectively extracted from two public adverse drug reaction databases-the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's Adverse Drug Event Reporting (JADER)-from 2004 to 2023 for further analysis.

Methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR), a pharmacovigilance technique, was employed to identify signals of adverse reactions, and the Chi-square test was utilized to assess differences between groups.

Results: Multiple NSAIDs associated with small bowel bleeding were identified in both databases. In the drug combination analysis, no significant differences in the risk of small bowel bleeding were found between NSAIDs combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and NSAIDs alone in FAERS (all p > 0.05). Decreasing risks were found when multiple NSAIDs were combined with rebamipide or probiotics compared to NSAIDs alone in JADER (p < 0.05 and ROR  < 1). In subgroup analyses of age and sex, older adults and males who used aspirin showed higher risk signals in both databases (all p < 0.05 and ROR  > 1).

Conclusion: PPIs did not show a significant impact on NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding, while rebamipide and probiotics may exhibited a preventive effect against NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding. Older adults and males constituted risk factors for aspirin-associated small bowel bleeding.

背景:目前,影响非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)引起的小肠出血的因素尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在通过药物警戒研究评估非甾体抗炎药相关小肠出血,并评估其他药物对其的影响,从而为临床实践提供有价值的见解。设计:回顾性地从2004年至2023年两个公共药物不良反应数据库——美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)和日本药品和医疗器械管理局的不良事件报告(JADER)中提取nsaid相关小肠出血的数据,以作进一步分析。方法:采用药物警戒技术报告优势比(ROR)识别不良反应信号,采用卡方检验评价组间差异。结果:在两个数据库中都发现了与小肠出血相关的多种非甾体抗炎药。在联合用药分析中,非甾体抗炎药联合质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)与单用非甾体抗炎药在FAERS中发生小肠出血的风险无显著差异(p < 0.05)。与单独使用非甾体抗炎药相比,在JADER中,多种非甾体抗炎药联合利巴米胺或益生菌可降低风险(p p 1)。结论:PPIs对非甾体抗炎药相关的小肠出血没有显著影响,而利巴米胺和益生菌可能对非甾体抗炎药相关的小肠出血有预防作用。老年人和男性是阿司匹林相关小肠出血的危险因素。
{"title":"Pharmacovigilance analysis of small bowel bleeding associated with NSAIDs.","authors":"Ying-Han Deng, Meiting Jiang, Yun Chen, Hong-Bin Chen","doi":"10.1177/20420986251318848","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251318848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the factors influencing small bowel bleeding caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding and evaluate the impact of other drugs on it through a pharmacovigilance study, thereby providing valuable insights for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data on NSAID-associated small bowel bleeding were retrospectively extracted from two public adverse drug reaction databases-the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency's Adverse Drug Event Reporting (JADER)-from 2004 to 2023 for further analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The reporting odds ratio (ROR), a pharmacovigilance technique, was employed to identify signals of adverse reactions, and the Chi-square test was utilized to assess differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple NSAIDs associated with small bowel bleeding were identified in both databases. In the drug combination analysis, no significant differences in the risk of small bowel bleeding were found between NSAIDs combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and NSAIDs alone in FAERS (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Decreasing risks were found when multiple NSAIDs were combined with rebamipide or probiotics compared to NSAIDs alone in JADER (<i>p</i> < 0.05 and ROR  < 1). In subgroup analyses of age and sex, older adults and males who used aspirin showed higher risk signals in both databases (all <i>p</i> < 0.05 and ROR  > 1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPIs did not show a significant impact on NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding, while rebamipide and probiotics may exhibited a preventive effect against NSAIDs-associated small bowel bleeding. Older adults and males constituted risk factors for aspirin-associated small bowel bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251318848"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056324/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Semaglutide: a gendered phenomenon-women's increased vulnerability to adverse drug reactions in the global weight loss trend. Semaglutide:一个性别现象——在全球减肥趋势中,女性对药物不良反应的脆弱性增加。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251332737
Eleonora Castellana, Maria Rachele Chiappetta
{"title":"Semaglutide: a gendered phenomenon-women's increased vulnerability to adverse drug reactions in the global weight loss trend.","authors":"Eleonora Castellana, Maria Rachele Chiappetta","doi":"10.1177/20420986251332737","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251332737","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251332737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033487/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144061866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacovigilance study on the reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation with immune checkpoint inhibitors: insights from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. 免疫检查点抑制剂房颤报告频率的药物警戒研究:来自FDA不良事件报告系统的见解。
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986241312497
Nunzia Balzano, Annamaria Mascolo, Donatella Ruggiero, Concetta Rafaniello, Giuseppe Paolisso, Francesco Rossi, Annalisa Capuano

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy but are linked with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including cardiac events.

Objective: This study aims to assess the reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation with ICIs using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Design: It is an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study.

Methods: Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from FAERS up to September 24, 2024. Cases reporting one or more ICIs (atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab, dostarlimab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and tremelimumab) and atrial fibrillation were selected. Disproportionality analyses were performed by applying the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the Informational Component (IC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results: A total of 1228 ICSRs were retrieved, of which 218 (17.75%) were related to combinations of ICIs. Most ICSRs (N = 812; 66.1%) referred to male patients and the age group most represented was ⩾65 years (N = 772; 62.9%). Atrial fibrillation was serious in 99.3% (N = 1220) of cases and had a fatal outcome (N = 248; 20.3%). Atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were associated with a statistically significant higher reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation compared to all other drugs (ROR: 1.90, IC: 0.91; ROR: 1.94, IC: 0.92; ROR: 1.52, IC: 0.60; ROR: 1.30, IC: 0.38; ROR: 1.66, IC: 0.72, respectively). The anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab showed a statistically significant lower reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation compared to all other drugs (ROR: 0.69, IC: -0.53) and to all other ICIs (ROR: 0.45, IC: -1.02). Moreover, anti-PD-L1 (ROR: 2.60, IC: 0.47) and anti-PD-1 (ROR: 2.12, IC: 0.16) were associated with a higher reporting of atrial fibrillation compared to anti-CTLA-4.

Conclusion: ICI-induced atrial fibrillation was serious and had severe outcomes. The anti-CTLA-4 showed a lower likelihood of reporting atrial fibrillation, while higher reporting was found with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1. Further studies are needed to confirm this safety aspect.

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已经改变了癌症治疗,但与免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)相关,包括心脏事件。目的:本研究旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据评估ICIs心房颤动的报告频率。设计:这是一项观察性、回顾性、药物警戒性研究。方法:检索截至2024年9月24日的FAERS病例安全报告(ICSRs)。报告一种或多种ICIs (atezolizumab、avelumab、cemiplimab、dostarlimumab、durvalumab、ipilimumab、nivolumab、pembrolizumab和tremelimumab)和房颤的病例被选中。歧化分析采用报告优势比(ROR)和95%置信区间(95% CI)的信息成分(IC)进行。结果:共检索到1228例icsr,其中218例(17.75%)与icrs联合相关。大多数icsr (N = 812;66.1%)涉及男性患者,最具代表性的年龄组是大于或等于65岁(N = 772;62.9%)。房颤严重发生率为99.3% (N = 1220),死亡发生率为248;20.3%)。与所有其他药物相比,Atezolizumab、avelumab、durvalumab、nivolumab和pembrolizumab与房颤报告频率的统计学显著性升高相关(ROR: 1.90, IC: 0.91;Ror: 1.94, ic: 0.92;Ror: 1.52, ic: 0.60;Ror: 1.30, ic: 0.38;ROR: 1.66, IC: 0.72)。与所有其他药物(ROR: 0.69, IC: -0.53)和所有其他ICIs (ROR: 0.45, IC: -1.02)相比,抗ctla -4易匹单抗的房颤报告频率具有统计学意义。此外,与抗ctla -4相比,抗pd - l1 (ROR: 2.60, IC: 0.47)和抗pd -1 (ROR: 2.12, IC: 0.16)与更高的房颤报告相关。结论:ci诱发心房颤动严重,预后严重。抗ctla -4报告心房颤动的可能性较低,而抗pd -1和抗pd - l1报告心房颤动的可能性较高。需要进一步的研究来证实这种安全性。
{"title":"Pharmacovigilance study on the reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation with immune checkpoint inhibitors: insights from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Nunzia Balzano, Annamaria Mascolo, Donatella Ruggiero, Concetta Rafaniello, Giuseppe Paolisso, Francesco Rossi, Annalisa Capuano","doi":"10.1177/20420986241312497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986241312497","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy but are linked with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including cardiac events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation with ICIs using data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>It is an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from FAERS up to September 24, 2024. Cases reporting one or more ICIs (atezolizumab, avelumab, cemiplimab, dostarlimab, durvalumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and tremelimumab) and atrial fibrillation were selected. Disproportionality analyses were performed by applying the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the Informational Component (IC) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1228 ICSRs were retrieved, of which 218 (17.75%) were related to combinations of ICIs. Most ICSRs (<i>N</i> = 812; 66.1%) referred to male patients and the age group most represented was ⩾65 years (<i>N</i> = 772; 62.9%). Atrial fibrillation was serious in 99.3% (<i>N</i> = 1220) of cases and had a fatal outcome (<i>N</i> = 248; 20.3%). Atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab were associated with a statistically significant higher reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation compared to all other drugs (ROR: 1.90, IC: 0.91; ROR: 1.94, IC: 0.92; ROR: 1.52, IC: 0.60; ROR: 1.30, IC: 0.38; ROR: 1.66, IC: 0.72, respectively). The anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab showed a statistically significant lower reporting frequency of atrial fibrillation compared to all other drugs (ROR: 0.69, IC: -0.53) and to all other ICIs (ROR: 0.45, IC: -1.02). Moreover, anti-PD-L1 (ROR: 2.60, IC: 0.47) and anti-PD-1 (ROR: 2.12, IC: 0.16) were associated with a higher reporting of atrial fibrillation compared to anti-CTLA-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICI-induced atrial fibrillation was serious and had severe outcomes. The anti-CTLA-4 showed a lower likelihood of reporting atrial fibrillation, while higher reporting was found with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1. Further studies are needed to confirm this safety aspect.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986241312497"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144011629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspective review: Will generative AI make common data models obsolete in future analyses of distributed data networks? 展望回顾:在未来的分布式数据网络分析中,生成式人工智能是否会使通用数据模型过时?
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251332743
Jeffery L Painter, Darmendra Ramcharran, Andrew Bate

Integrating real-world healthcare data is challenging due to diverse formats and terminologies, making standardization resource-intensive. While Common Data Models (CDMs) facilitate interoperability, they often cause information loss, exhibit semantic inconsistencies, and are labor-intensive to implement and update. We explore how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially large language models (LLMs), could make CDMs obsolete in quantitative healthcare data analysis by interpreting natural language queries and generating code, enabling direct interaction with raw data. Knowledge graphs (KGs) standardize relationships and semantics across heterogeneous data, preserving integrity. This perspective review proposes a fourth generation of distributed data network analysis, building on previous generations categorized by their approach to data standardization and utilization. It emphasizes the potential of GenAI to overcome the limitations CDMs with GenAI-enabled access, KGs, and automatic code generation. A data commons may further enhance this capability, and KGs may well be needed to enable effective GenAI. Addressing privacy, security, and governance is critical; any new method must ensure protections comparable to CDM-based models. Our approach would aim to enable efficient, real-time analyses across diverse datasets and enhance patient safety. We recommend prioritizing research to assess how GenAI can transform quantitative healthcare data analysis by overcoming current limitations.

由于格式和术语的多样性,集成现实世界的医疗保健数据具有挑战性,这使得标准化需要大量资源。虽然公共数据模型(cdm)促进了互操作性,但它们通常会导致信息丢失,表现出语义不一致,并且在实现和更新方面需要大量的劳动。我们探讨了生成式人工智能(GenAI),特别是大型语言模型(llm)如何通过解释自然语言查询和生成代码,使cdm在定量医疗数据分析中过时,从而实现与原始数据的直接交互。知识图(KGs)标准化了异构数据之间的关系和语义,保持了完整性。这一观点提出了第四代分布式数据网络分析,建立在前几代的基础上,根据他们的数据标准化和利用方法进行分类。它强调了GenAI的潜力,通过支持GenAI的访问、KGs和自动代码生成来克服cdm的局限性。数据共享可能进一步增强这种能力,并且很可能需要kg来实现有效的GenAI。解决隐私、安全和治理问题至关重要;任何新方法都必须确保与基于cdm的模型相媲美的保护。我们的方法旨在实现跨不同数据集的高效、实时分析,并提高患者的安全性。我们建议优先研究,以评估GenAI如何通过克服当前的局限性来改变定量医疗保健数据分析。
{"title":"Perspective review: Will generative AI make common data models obsolete in future analyses of distributed data networks?","authors":"Jeffery L Painter, Darmendra Ramcharran, Andrew Bate","doi":"10.1177/20420986251332743","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251332743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating real-world healthcare data is challenging due to diverse formats and terminologies, making standardization resource-intensive. While Common Data Models (CDMs) facilitate interoperability, they often cause information loss, exhibit semantic inconsistencies, and are labor-intensive to implement and update. We explore how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially large language models (LLMs), could make CDMs obsolete in quantitative healthcare data analysis by interpreting natural language queries and generating code, enabling direct interaction with raw data. Knowledge graphs (KGs) standardize relationships and semantics across heterogeneous data, preserving integrity. This perspective review proposes a fourth generation of distributed data network analysis, building on previous generations categorized by their approach to data standardization and utilization. It emphasizes the potential of GenAI to overcome the limitations CDMs with GenAI-enabled access, KGs, and automatic code generation. A data commons may further enhance this capability, and KGs may well be needed to enable effective GenAI. Addressing privacy, security, and governance is critical; any new method must ensure protections comparable to CDM-based models. Our approach would aim to enable efficient, real-time analyses across diverse datasets and enhance patient safety. We recommend prioritizing research to assess how GenAI can transform quantitative healthcare data analysis by overcoming current limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251332743"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033412/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144027155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mydriasis mediated by local anesthetics: an unexpected adverse event or new therapeutic indication? 局麻药介导的抽丝:意外的不良事件还是新的治疗指征?
IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20420986251332740
Homero Contreras-Salinas, Janet Cristina Vázquez-Beltrán, María Soledad Romero-López, Oscar Olvera-Montaño, Lourdes Yolotzin Rodríguez-Herrera

The increasing off-label use of medications needs a robust pharmacovigilance system. This is particularly crucial given the abundance of scientific data that can be harnessed to ensure a product's safety. Our review focuses on the off-label use of local anesthetics, a common practice in topical and intracameral applications. However, the occurrence of mydriasis, as indicated in the monographs/summaries of product characteristics, is an unexpected adverse event. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of mydriasis caused by local anesthetics, both as an unexpected adverse event and as an off-label use, to reinforce the importance of pharmacovigilance practices. We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline/PubMed and Google Scholar from two distinct perspectives: examining the occurrence of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetic as an adverse event and as an off-label use. Our search yielded 14 articles that reported mydriasis as an unexpected adverse event with the use of anesthetics, with dental procedures being a significant contributor to this type of event. Also, we identified eight articles that explored the off-label use of local anesthetics to induce mydriasis, with the most common method of drug administration being intracameral injection. These findings underscore the importance of our research in understanding the unexpected adverse event of mydriasis and the potential for off-label use of local anesthetics. They also highlight the need for continued involvement and vigilance in this area, as our understanding of these phenomena continues to evolve and further investigation is crucial. The use of local anesthetics for mydriasis holds significant promise, particularly in ophthalmological surgeries. This approach could potentially mitigate the adverse events associated with conventional mydriatics, offering a more efficient and safer alternative. Furthermore, using a single medication for akinesia, anesthesia, and mydriasis could significantly enhance the efficiency and convenience of surgical procedures. On the other hand, it is crucial to extend the knowledge of the mydriasis-anesthesia association through risk minimization activities (e.g., the inclusion of monographs/summary of product characteristics) to communicate the risk of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetics.

越来越多的超说明书用药需要一个强有力的药物警戒系统。考虑到可以用来确保产品安全的大量科学数据,这一点尤为重要。我们的回顾集中在说明书外使用局部麻醉剂,一种常见的做法,在局部和内窥镜应用。然而,正如产品特性的专著/摘要所指出的那样,蝇蛆病的发生是一种意想不到的不良事件。我们的目的是全面了解由局部麻醉剂引起的蛔虫病,包括意外不良事件和标签外使用,以加强药物警戒实践的重要性。我们从两个不同的角度对Medline/PubMed和谷歌Scholar进行了全面的搜索:检查局部麻醉剂作为不良事件和作为标签外使用时发生的瞳孔肿大。我们检索了14篇文章,这些文章报道了使用麻醉剂时出现的一种意想不到的不良事件,而牙科手术是导致这种事件的重要因素。此外,我们还发现了8篇文章,探讨了超说明书使用局部麻醉剂诱导蛔虫的情况,其中最常见的给药方法是肠腔内注射。这些发现强调了我们的研究在理解蛔虫意外不良事件和超说明书使用局部麻醉剂的可能性方面的重要性。它们还强调了在这一领域继续参与和保持警惕的必要性,因为我们对这些现象的理解在不断发展,进一步的调查至关重要。使用局部麻醉剂治疗瞳孔肿大具有重要的前景,特别是在眼科手术中。这种方法可能潜在地减轻与传统心肌炎相关的不良事件,提供更有效和更安全的替代方案。此外,使用单一药物治疗肌动症、麻醉和抽丝可以显著提高手术的效率和便利性。另一方面,通过风险最小化活动(例如,包括专著/产品特性总结)来扩展蛔虫病与麻醉关联的知识是至关重要的,以便与使用局部麻醉剂的蛔虫病风险进行沟通。
{"title":"Mydriasis mediated by local anesthetics: an unexpected adverse event or new therapeutic indication?","authors":"Homero Contreras-Salinas, Janet Cristina Vázquez-Beltrán, María Soledad Romero-López, Oscar Olvera-Montaño, Lourdes Yolotzin Rodríguez-Herrera","doi":"10.1177/20420986251332740","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986251332740","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing off-label use of medications needs a robust pharmacovigilance system. This is particularly crucial given the abundance of scientific data that can be harnessed to ensure a product's safety. Our review focuses on the off-label use of local anesthetics, a common practice in topical and intracameral applications. However, the occurrence of mydriasis, as indicated in the monographs/summaries of product characteristics, is an unexpected adverse event. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of mydriasis caused by local anesthetics, both as an unexpected adverse event and as an off-label use, to reinforce the importance of pharmacovigilance practices. We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline/PubMed and Google Scholar from two distinct perspectives: examining the occurrence of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetic as an adverse event and as an off-label use. Our search yielded 14 articles that reported mydriasis as an unexpected adverse event with the use of anesthetics, with dental procedures being a significant contributor to this type of event. Also, we identified eight articles that explored the off-label use of local anesthetics to induce mydriasis, with the most common method of drug administration being intracameral injection. These findings underscore the importance of our research in understanding the unexpected adverse event of mydriasis and the potential for off-label use of local anesthetics. They also highlight the need for continued involvement and vigilance in this area, as our understanding of these phenomena continues to evolve and further investigation is crucial. The use of local anesthetics for mydriasis holds significant promise, particularly in ophthalmological surgeries. This approach could potentially mitigate the adverse events associated with conventional mydriatics, offering a more efficient and safer alternative. Furthermore, using a single medication for akinesia, anesthesia, and mydriasis could significantly enhance the efficiency and convenience of surgical procedures. On the other hand, it is crucial to extend the knowledge of the mydriasis-anesthesia association through risk minimization activities (e.g., the inclusion of monographs/summary of product characteristics) to communicate the risk of mydriasis with the use of local anesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":"16 ","pages":"20420986251332740"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144039344","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1