首页 > 最新文献

The Permanente journal最新文献

英文 中文
Physician Billing for Advance Care Planning Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2016-2021. 2016-2021年医疗保险按服务收费受益人中提前护理计划的医生计费。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/24.177
Nan Wang, Changchuan Jiang, Elizabeth Paulk, Tianci Wang, Xin Hu

Introduction: In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.

Methods: The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to compare the average number of visits by metropolitan status.

Results: The percentage of practitioners billing ACP visits tripled from 1.76% in 2016 to 4.56% in 2021, with the highest percentage among hospice and palliative medicine practitioners (36.94%) in 2021. ACP service volume was similar by metropolitan status for hospice and palliative medicine, but it was higher in nonmetropolitan regions for cancer-related specialties, non-cancer terminal disease specialties, and primary and geriatrics care.

Discussion: This nationwide analysis showed low adoption of ACP billing by 2021, and it varied widely across specialties. This may reflect practical challenges of ACP related to comfort level with ACP discussion and documentation burden among the professional communities.

Conclusion: Despite an overall increase in the proportion of physicians billing ACP codes from 2016 to 2021, adoption remained low. Efforts are needed to address barriers to ACP and provide goal-concordant care to patients.

导读:2016年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心开始报销从业人员为患者提供提前护理计划(ACP)所花费的时间。本研究通过检查2016年至2021年医疗专业ACP计费趋势以及各大都市ACP服务量的差异,评估了该政策的使用情况。方法:作者使用相应的医疗保健通用程序编码系统代码分析了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医疗保险提供者使用和支付文件(2016-2021),这些文件来自6个专科组,以得出任何ACP就诊的从业者百分比的趋势。进行了Wilcoxon测试,以比较各大城市的平均访问次数。结果:使用ACP就诊的执业医师比例从2016年的1.76%增加到2021年的4.56%,增长了两倍,其中临终关怀和姑息医学执业医师比例最高(36.94%)。ACP服务量在城市地区的临终关怀和姑息治疗方面相似,但在非城市地区,癌症相关专科、非癌症晚期疾病专科、初级和老年保健的ACP服务量更高。讨论:这项全国性的分析显示,到2021年,ACP计费的采用率很低,而且各专业的采用率差异很大。这可能反映了ACP的实际挑战,涉及专业团体对ACP讨论和文件负担的舒适程度。结论:尽管从2016年到2021年,使用ACP代码的医生比例总体上有所增加,但采用率仍然很低。需要努力解决ACP的障碍,并为患者提供目标一致的护理。
{"title":"Physician Billing for Advance Care Planning Among Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2016-2021.","authors":"Nan Wang, Changchuan Jiang, Elizabeth Paulk, Tianci Wang, Xin Hu","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.177","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/24.177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started reimbursing practitioners for their time spent providing advance care planning (ACP) with patients. This study assessed utilization of this policy by examining trends in ACP billing across medical specialties from 2016 to 2021 and differences in ACP service volume by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment files (2016-2021) from 6 specialty groups using corresponding Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes to derive trends in the percentage of practitioners billing any ACP visit. Wilcoxon tests were conducted to compare the average number of visits by metropolitan status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of practitioners billing ACP visits tripled from 1.76% in 2016 to 4.56% in 2021, with the highest percentage among hospice and palliative medicine practitioners (36.94%) in 2021. ACP service volume was similar by metropolitan status for hospice and palliative medicine, but it was higher in nonmetropolitan regions for cancer-related specialties, non-cancer terminal disease specialties, and primary and geriatrics care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This nationwide analysis showed low adoption of ACP billing by 2021, and it varied widely across specialties. This may reflect practical challenges of ACP related to comfort level with ACP discussion and documentation burden among the professional communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite an overall increase in the proportion of physicians billing ACP codes from 2016 to 2021, adoption remained low. Efforts are needed to address barriers to ACP and provide goal-concordant care to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"105-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144817553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Call for Papers: Strengthening the Physician Workforce. 征文:加强医师队伍。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.140
{"title":"Call for Papers: Strengthening the Physician Workforce.","authors":"","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.140","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.140","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":"29 3","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485240/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Apixaban With Warfarin in Patients on Dialysis Within an Integrated Health Care System. 阿哌沙班与华法林在综合医疗系统透析患者中的比较。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.043
Tariq Shaheed, Douglas Stram, Aida Shirazi, Sumie Iwasaki, Cynthia Davila, Sijie Zheng

Introduction: The risk and benefit for patients on dialysis receiving anticoagulation (AC) therapy have not been clearly established. This study aimed to compare the rates of clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events in patients on dialysis.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using Kaiser Permanente Northern California's electronic medical record database from 2013 to 2021. Patients over 18 years old on dialysis who were prescribed warfarin or apixaban were included. Patients with mechanical valves were excluded. The outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, χ2 tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis.

Results: In the study period, 9832 patients were not on AC, and 2088 were taking apixaban or warfarin. The baseline demographics (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex) were comparable between apixaban and warfarin groups. Among the patients on anticoagulants, 181 were taking apixaban, while 1907 were taking only warfarin. The outcomes 1-3 years within the study period showed that the rates of clinically significant bleeding and thrombosis were comparable in both groups, with the exception of the rate of dialysis access thrombosis being lower in the apixaban group (7% vs 17%, P < .001).

Conclusion: In this diverse cohort, apixaban and warfarin showed no clinically significant differences in bleeding rates and lower rate of access thrombosis with apixaban. This study adds to the growing data of AC in the population with end-stage kidney disease, highlighting the need to enroll patients in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to inform future practice.

透析患者接受抗凝(AC)治疗的风险和获益尚未明确确定。本研究旨在比较透析患者临床显著血栓形成和出血事件的发生率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用Kaiser Permanente北加州的电子病历数据库,时间为2013年至2021年。18岁以上的透析患者使用华法林或阿哌沙班。排除机械瓣膜患者。对连续变量采用Mann-Whitney检验,对分类变量采用χ2检验,对事件时间分析采用Kaplan-Meier法。结果:研究期间,9832例患者未使用AC, 2088例患者正在使用阿哌沙班或华法林。阿哌沙班组和华法林组的基线人口统计数据(年龄、Charlson合并症指数和性别)具有可比性。在使用抗凝药物的患者中,181例使用阿哌沙班,而1907例仅使用华法林。研究期间1-3年的结果显示,两组的临床显著性出血和血栓发生率相当,阿哌沙班组的透析通路血栓发生率较低(7% vs 17%, P < 0.001)。结论:在这个多样化的队列中,阿哌沙班和华法林在阿哌沙班治疗的出血率和较低的通路血栓发生率方面没有临床显著差异。这项研究增加了终末期肾脏疾病人群中AC的数据,强调需要将患者纳入足够有力的随机对照试验,为未来的实践提供信息。
{"title":"Comparison of Apixaban With Warfarin in Patients on Dialysis Within an Integrated Health Care System.","authors":"Tariq Shaheed, Douglas Stram, Aida Shirazi, Sumie Iwasaki, Cynthia Davila, Sijie Zheng","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.043","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The risk and benefit for patients on dialysis receiving anticoagulation (AC) therapy have not been clearly established. This study aimed to compare the rates of clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events in patients on dialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study conducted using Kaiser Permanente Northern California's electronic medical record database from 2013 to 2021. Patients over 18 years old on dialysis who were prescribed warfarin or apixaban were included. Patients with mechanical valves were excluded. The outcomes were analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables, χ<sup>2</sup> tests for categorical variables, and Kaplan-Meier method for time-to-event analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study period, 9832 patients were not on AC, and 2088 were taking apixaban or warfarin. The baseline demographics (age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and sex) were comparable between apixaban and warfarin groups. Among the patients on anticoagulants, 181 were taking apixaban, while 1907 were taking only warfarin. The outcomes 1-3 years within the study period showed that the rates of clinically significant bleeding and thrombosis were comparable in both groups, with the exception of the rate of dialysis access thrombosis being lower in the apixaban group (7% vs 17%, <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this diverse cohort, apixaban and warfarin showed no clinically significant differences in bleeding rates and lower rate of access thrombosis with apixaban. This study adds to the growing data of AC in the population with end-stage kidney disease, highlighting the need to enroll patients in an adequately powered randomized controlled trial to inform future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"64-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Study in Northeast Georgia. 诊断银屑病关节炎的相关因素:乔治亚州东北部的一项回顾性研究。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.025
Romina Faridizad, Brent A Flickinger, Ania Izabela Rynarzewska, Sarah Ross, Shane Robinson, Aditya Kumar Ghosh

Background: Approximately 15.5% of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are currently not diagnosed or experience delayed diagnosis with negative outcomes. This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated patients with psoriasis to determine what factors were associated with diagnosis of PsA.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed using electronic medical record from primary care clinics across the northeast Georgia region. The study population included patients with psoriasis evaluated in the clinic between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. Patients with PsA were compared to those without PsA to assess for factors associated with the diagnosis of PsA.

Results: The probability of diagnosis of PsA increased with increasing number of clinic encounters (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; P < .05). Males (OR, 0.634; P < .001) were less likely to be diagnosed compared to females. Patients with Medicare (adjusted OR, 1.707; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-2.837; P < .05) and commercial/private insurances (adjusted OR, 2.043; 95% CI, 1.28-3.258; P < .01) had a higher chance of being diagnosed in comparison to patients with Medicaid. Black patients were less likely to be diagnosed compared to White patients (OR, 0.231; P < .001). Hispanic patients were less likely to be diagnosed with PsA compared to patients who were not Hispanic (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51; P < .05).

Conclusions: The study highlighted potential factors associated with the diagnosis of PsA among patients with psoriasis. Sex, race, ethnicity, number of clinic encounters, and insurance type were all found to have associations with likelihood of receiving a PsA diagnosis. These findings were hypothesis-generating and suggest potential disparities in care, particularly for diverse populations, warranting further research.

背景:大约15.5%的银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者目前未被诊断或经历阴性结果的延迟诊断。这项回顾性的横断面研究评估了银屑病患者,以确定哪些因素与PsA的诊断相关。方法:回顾性分析乔治亚州东北部地区初级保健诊所的电子病历。研究人群包括2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在诊所评估的牛皮癣患者。将患有PsA的患者与没有PsA的患者进行比较,以评估与PsA诊断相关的因素。结果:PsA的诊断概率随着临床接触次数的增加而增加(优势比[OR], 1.18;P < 0.05)。男性(OR, 0.634;P < 0.001)被诊断的可能性低于女性。医疗保险患者(调整OR, 1.707;95%置信区间[CI], 1.027-2.837;P < 0.05)和商业/私人保险(调整OR, 2.043;95% ci, 1.28-3.258;P < 0.01)与接受医疗补助的患者相比,有更高的被诊断的机会。与白人患者相比,黑人患者被诊断的可能性更低(OR, 0.231;P < 0.001)。与非西班牙裔患者相比,西班牙裔患者被诊断为PsA的可能性更小(OR, 0.2;95% ci, 0.07-0.51;P < 0.05)。结论:该研究强调了银屑病患者PsA诊断相关的潜在因素。性别、种族、民族、就诊次数和保险类型都与接受PsA诊断的可能性有关。这些发现是假设产生的,并表明在护理方面存在潜在差异,特别是在不同人群中,值得进一步研究。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis: A Retrospective Study in Northeast Georgia.","authors":"Romina Faridizad, Brent A Flickinger, Ania Izabela Rynarzewska, Sarah Ross, Shane Robinson, Aditya Kumar Ghosh","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.025","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 15.5% of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are currently not diagnosed or experience delayed diagnosis with negative outcomes. This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluated patients with psoriasis to determine what factors were associated with diagnosis of PsA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed using electronic medical record from primary care clinics across the northeast Georgia region. The study population included patients with psoriasis evaluated in the clinic between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022. Patients with PsA were compared to those without PsA to assess for factors associated with the diagnosis of PsA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The probability of diagnosis of PsA increased with increasing number of clinic encounters (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; <i>P</i> < .05). Males (OR, 0.634; <i>P</i> < .001) were less likely to be diagnosed compared to females. Patients with Medicare (adjusted OR, 1.707; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-2.837; <i>P</i> < .05) and commercial/private insurances (adjusted OR, 2.043; 95% CI, 1.28-3.258; <i>P</i> < .01) had a higher chance of being diagnosed in comparison to patients with Medicaid. Black patients were less likely to be diagnosed compared to White patients (OR, 0.231; <i>P</i> < .001). Hispanic patients were less likely to be diagnosed with PsA compared to patients who were not Hispanic (OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51; <i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted potential factors associated with the diagnosis of PsA among patients with psoriasis. Sex, race, ethnicity, number of clinic encounters, and insurance type were all found to have associations with likelihood of receiving a PsA diagnosis. These findings were hypothesis-generating and suggest potential disparities in care, particularly for diverse populations, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"73-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144691630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing Best Practices in a Simulated Lumbar Puncture Workshop With Medical Students. 在医学生模拟腰椎穿刺工作坊中评估最佳实践。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/24.155
Lauren Dugan, Kyle M Rei, Arisa Ueno, Joshua Mahutga, Madhu Varma

Introduction: Simulation labs provide trainees the opportunity to practice procedures in a safe, controlled, nonjudgmental environment. It is unclear which teaching method leads to the highest levels of trainee skill competency when learning complex simulated procedures, such as lumbar puncture.

Methods: First-year medical students participated in a randomized controlled trial of an early-exposure simulated lumbar puncture (sLP) workshop. All were randomized to 1 of 2 teaching methods: 1) traditional "see one, do one" method or 2) Peyton's 4-step method. Students were taught how to perform an sLP based on the specific teaching method. Competence during sLP attempts was assessed using binary checklists, and student confidence was assessed using pre- and post-workshop surveys. Independent t tests and bivariate correlations were performed.

Results: Thirty-five first-year medical students participated in the sLP workshops. There were no statistically significant differences between the "see one, do one" method and Peyton's 4-step teaching method in checklist scores (P = .121, Cohen's d = 0.540) or change in confidence (P = .631, Cohen's d = 0.164). The difference in the speed of task completion favored Peyton's teaching method (P = .044, Cohen's d = -0.711). None of these outcomes demonstrated a significant correlation with each other within the cohort, the Peyton's subgroup, or the "see one, do one" subgroup.

Discussion: In this study, the traditional "see one, do one" model and Peyton's 4-step approach produced similar skill acquisition and confidence levels among medical students during an sLP workshop. Peyton's 4-step approach led to faster procedural completion times.

Conclusion: The current study adds to the body of literature that has failed to find a notable impact in skill competence outcomes when teaching complex procedures.

简介:模拟实验室为受训者提供了在安全、可控、非评判的环境中实践程序的机会。目前尚不清楚,在学习复杂的模拟手术(如腰椎穿刺)时,哪种教学方法能使受训者的技能能力达到最高水平。方法:一年级医学生参加了一项早期暴露模拟腰椎穿刺(sLP)研讨会的随机对照试验。所有人都被随机分配到两种教学方法中的一种:1)传统的“看一做一”方法或2)佩顿的四步法。根据具体的教学方法,教授学生如何执行sLP。在sLP尝试期间的能力评估使用二进制清单,学生的信心评估使用课前和课后调查。进行独立t检验和双变量相关性分析。结果:35名一年级医学生参加了sLP研讨会。“看一做一”教学法与Peyton四步教学法在检查表得分(P = 0.121, Cohen’s d = 0.540)和置信度(P = 0.631, Cohen’s d = 0.164)上差异无统计学意义。任务完成速度的差异有利于Peyton的教学方法(P = 0.044, Cohen的d = -0.711)。这些结果在队列、Peyton亚组或“看一个,做一个”亚组中都没有显示出显著的相关性。讨论:在本研究中,传统的“看一做一”模式和Peyton的四步方法在sLP研讨会中产生了相似的技能习得和信心水平。Peyton的4步方法加快了程序完成时间。结论:本研究补充了已有文献未能发现复杂程序教学对技能能力结果的显著影响。
{"title":"Assessing Best Practices in a Simulated Lumbar Puncture Workshop With Medical Students.","authors":"Lauren Dugan, Kyle M Rei, Arisa Ueno, Joshua Mahutga, Madhu Varma","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.155","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/24.155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation labs provide trainees the opportunity to practice procedures in a safe, controlled, nonjudgmental environment. It is unclear which teaching method leads to the highest levels of trainee skill competency when learning complex simulated procedures, such as lumbar puncture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First-year medical students participated in a randomized controlled trial of an early-exposure simulated lumbar puncture (sLP) workshop. All were randomized to 1 of 2 teaching methods: 1) traditional \"see one, do one\" method or 2) Peyton's 4-step method. Students were taught how to perform an sLP based on the specific teaching method. Competence during sLP attempts was assessed using binary checklists, and student confidence was assessed using pre- and post-workshop surveys. Independent <i>t</i> tests and bivariate correlations were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five first-year medical students participated in the sLP workshops. There were no statistically significant differences between the \"see one, do one\" method and Peyton's 4-step teaching method in checklist scores (<i>P</i> = .121, Cohen's d = 0.540) or change in confidence (<i>P</i> = .631, Cohen's d = 0.164). The difference in the speed of task completion favored Peyton's teaching method (<i>P</i> = .044, Cohen's d = -0.711). None of these outcomes demonstrated a significant correlation with each other within the cohort, the Peyton's subgroup, or the \"see one, do one\" subgroup.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, the traditional \"see one, do one\" model and Peyton's 4-step approach produced similar skill acquisition and confidence levels among medical students during an sLP workshop. Peyton's 4-step approach led to faster procedural completion times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study adds to the body of literature that has failed to find a notable impact in skill competence outcomes when teaching complex procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485252/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144970156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Call for Papers: Strengthening the Physician Workforce. 征文:加强医师队伍。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-15 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.140
{"title":"Call for Papers: Strengthening the Physician Workforce.","authors":"","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.140","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/25.140","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":"29 3","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145065384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mitigation of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Closed Health Care Delivery System. 在一个封闭的医疗服务系统中减轻转移性结直肠癌手术治疗和预后的种族和民族差异。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/24.178
Claire J Yang, Harry Kim, Michael Tam, Vikram Attaluri, Anna Leung

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. However, none of these studies has examined whether these disparities exist in a closed health care delivery system. The aim of this study was to identify racial and ethnic disparities in rates of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRLM) within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 110 adult patients with CRLM who underwent surgery on both sites with curative intent at any Kaiser Permanente Southern California facility between 2010 and 2020. The authors stratified patients by race and ethnicity as Asian/Asian American, Black, Hispanic, or White individuals.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in race and ethnicity breakdown between all Kaiser Permanente members and the patients diagnosed with CRLM (P < .01), with a lower proportion of Hispanic patients diagnosed (P < .01). Between the surgical and nonsurgical cohorts, the statistically significant difference between race and ethnicity breakdown (P = .03) was due to Hispanic patients being more likely to undergo surgery (P = .01). Between racial and ethnic groups within the surgical cohort there was no significant difference in mean age at diagnosis (P = .63), time from diagnosis to surgical resection (P = .64), proportion of synchronous vs metachronous resections (P = .53), complication rate (P = .91), recurrence rate (P = .40), or 5- and 10-year survival (P = .5 and P = .9).

Conclusion: Within a closed health care delivery system, racial and ethnic disparities in treatment and outcomes were not observed for surgical patients with CRLM. However, disparities in diagnosis for the Hispanic population persist and should be addressed.

背景:以往的研究已经证明,结直肠癌患者的治疗和预后存在种族和民族差异。然而,这些研究都没有调查这些差异是否存在于封闭的卫生保健提供系统中。本研究的目的是确定Kaiser Permanente南加州系统中结直肠癌合并肝转移(CRLM)患者的诊断率、治疗和预后的种族和民族差异。方法:作者对2010年至2020年期间在Kaiser Permanente南加州医院接受两个部位手术的110例成年CRLM患者进行了回顾性研究。作者根据种族和民族将患者分为亚洲/亚裔美国人、黑人、西班牙裔或白人。结果:所有Kaiser Permanente会员与诊断为CRLM的患者在种族和民族划分方面存在统计学差异(P < 0.01),其中西班牙裔患者诊断比例较低(P < 0.01)。在手术组和非手术组之间,种族和民族划分之间的统计学显著差异(P = 0.03)是由于西班牙裔患者更有可能接受手术(P = 0.01)。在手术队列中,种族和民族之间在诊断时的平均年龄(P = 0.63)、从诊断到手术切除的时间(P = 0.64)、同步和非同步切除的比例(P = 0.53)、并发症发生率(P = 0.91)、复发率(P = 0.40)、5年和10年生存率(P = 0.5和P = 0.9)方面没有显著差异。结论:在一个封闭的卫生保健系统中,CRLM手术患者的治疗和结果没有观察到种族和民族差异。然而,西班牙裔人群的诊断差异仍然存在,应该加以解决。
{"title":"Mitigation of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Surgical Treatment and Outcomes of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Closed Health Care Delivery System.","authors":"Claire J Yang, Harry Kim, Michael Tam, Vikram Attaluri, Anna Leung","doi":"10.7812/TPP/24.178","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/24.178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have demonstrated racial and ethnic disparities in the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. However, none of these studies has examined whether these disparities exist in a closed health care delivery system. The aim of this study was to identify racial and ethnic disparities in rates of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis (CRLM) within the Kaiser Permanente Southern California system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective review of 110 adult patients with CRLM who underwent surgery on both sites with curative intent at any Kaiser Permanente Southern California facility between 2010 and 2020. The authors stratified patients by race and ethnicity as Asian/Asian American, Black, Hispanic, or White individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference in race and ethnicity breakdown between all Kaiser Permanente members and the patients diagnosed with CRLM (<i>P</i> < .01), with a lower proportion of Hispanic patients diagnosed (<i>P</i> < .01). Between the surgical and nonsurgical cohorts, the statistically significant difference between race and ethnicity breakdown (<i>P</i> = .03) was due to Hispanic patients being more likely to undergo surgery (<i>P</i> = .01). Between racial and ethnic groups within the surgical cohort there was no significant difference in mean age at diagnosis (<i>P</i> = .63), time from diagnosis to surgical resection (<i>P</i> = .64), proportion of synchronous vs metachronous resections (<i>P</i> = .53), complication rate (<i>P</i> = .91), recurrence rate (<i>P</i> = .40), or 5- and 10-year survival (<i>P</i> = .5 and <i>P</i> = .9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within a closed health care delivery system, racial and ethnic disparities in treatment and outcomes were not observed for surgical patients with CRLM. However, disparities in diagnosis for the Hispanic population persist and should be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485250/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144235265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unmasking Risk Factors for Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction Resulting From Early Stages of the Pandemic: A Case-Control Study of Lost and Lingering Smells. 揭示由大流行早期阶段导致的covid -19后嗅觉功能障碍的风险因素:一项关于丢失和残留气味的病例对照研究。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.010
Brooke Stephanian, Jacob Hoerter, Julia Wei, Richard Pellizzari, Jonathan Liang

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted olfactory dysfunction (OD) as a major and often persistent symptom in affected individuals. Thus, it is important to identify demographic and clinical factors contributing to OD among patients with COVID-19.

Methods: A case-control (1:3) study was performed in adult patients with COVID-19 diagnosis between July 2020 and June 2021. Cases had OD; controls did not have OD. OD was subclassified as acute smell loss (< 3 months), chronic smell loss (> 3 months), or altered sense of smell (eg, parosmia, phantosmia). Bivariate tests and multivariable logistic regression were performed for analysis.

Results: Of the 4220 patients that met criteria, 1055 (25%) had OD. Of those with OD, 650 (61.6%) had acute smell reduction, 350 (33.2%) had chronic smell reduction, and 245 (23.2%) had altered sense of smell. Older (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.89), male (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.72), and Asian (OR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95) patients were less likely to experience OD. Having seasonal allergies (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.86) and being hospitalized (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.02) increased the likelihood of OD development. Compared with acute loss, chronic smell loss was likelier in older, female, non-White, hospitalized, and cerebrovascular disease patients (P < .05).

Discussion: Understanding the course of post-COVID-19 OD is becoming increasingly important and may broaden these insights.

Conclusion: Being younger, female, and atopic conferred highest likelihood of OD development after COVID-19.

2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行突出表明,嗅觉功能障碍(OD)是受影响个体的主要且经常持续的症状。因此,确定导致COVID-19患者用药过量的人口统计学和临床因素非常重要。方法:对2020年7月至2021年6月诊断为COVID-19的成年患者进行病例对照(1:3)研究。病例有用药过量;对照组没有吸毒过量。OD又分为急性嗅觉丧失(< 3个月)、慢性嗅觉丧失(< 3个月)或嗅觉改变(如嗅觉缺失、幻觉)。采用双变量检验和多变量logistic回归进行分析。结果:在4220例符合标准的患者中,1055例(25%)有OD。在吸毒过量的患者中,650人(61.6%)有急性嗅觉减退,350人(33.2%)有慢性嗅觉减退,245人(23.2%)有嗅觉改变。老年人(优势比[OR], 0.84;95%可信区间[CI], 0.79-0.89),男性(OR, 0.62;95% CI, 0.54-0.72)和亚洲人(OR 0.75;95% CI(0.59-0.95),患者较少出现药物过量。有季节性过敏(OR, 1.44;95% CI, 1.11-1.86)和住院(OR, 1.52;95% CI, 1.14-2.02)增加了发生OD的可能性。与急性嗅觉丧失相比,慢性嗅觉丧失在老年、女性、非白人、住院和脑血管疾病患者中更有可能发生(P < 0.05)。讨论:了解covid -19后OD的过程变得越来越重要,并可能扩大这些见解。结论:年轻、女性和特应性患者在COVID-19后发生OD的可能性最高。
{"title":"Unmasking Risk Factors for Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction Resulting From Early Stages of the Pandemic: A Case-Control Study of Lost and Lingering Smells.","authors":"Brooke Stephanian, Jacob Hoerter, Julia Wei, Richard Pellizzari, Jonathan Liang","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.010","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted olfactory dysfunction (OD) as a major and often persistent symptom in affected individuals. Thus, it is important to identify demographic and clinical factors contributing to OD among patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control (1:3) study was performed in adult patients with COVID-19 diagnosis between July 2020 and June 2021. Cases had OD; controls did not have OD. OD was subclassified as acute smell loss (< 3 months), chronic smell loss (> 3 months), or altered sense of smell (eg, parosmia, phantosmia). Bivariate tests and multivariable logistic regression were performed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 4220 patients that met criteria, 1055 (25%) had OD. Of those with OD, 650 (61.6%) had acute smell reduction, 350 (33.2%) had chronic smell reduction, and 245 (23.2%) had altered sense of smell. Older (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.89), male (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54-0.72), and Asian (OR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.95) patients were less likely to experience OD. Having seasonal allergies (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.11-1.86) and being hospitalized (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14-2.02) increased the likelihood of OD development. Compared with acute loss, chronic smell loss was likelier in older, female, non-White, hospitalized, and cerebrovascular disease patients (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding the course of post-COVID-19 OD is becoming increasingly important and may broaden these insights.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Being younger, female, and atopic conferred highest likelihood of OD development after COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144102684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Professional Title Use and Gender Representation During Grand Rounds and Invited Lectureships Across Specialties. 职称的使用和性别代表在大查房和跨专业的特邀演讲。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.003
Alexandra Hernandez, Mollie C Marr, Alexandra Pincus, Karen J Brasel

Introduction: Studies show that women are underrepresented in grand rounds across academic specialties. When women are invited as speakers, they are less likely to be introduced by their professional title compared to men. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influenced the use of professional titles when introducing speakers at grand rounds.

Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of grand rounds from October 2017 to March 2020 for the departments of internal medicine, neurology, OB/Gyn, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery at a large, academic medical center in the United States. Introductions were coded for the use of speakers' title, introducer and speaker gender, introducer and speaker training level, and speaker home institution.

Results: A total of 386 unique grand rounds and invited lectureships were reviewed for a total of 717 introductions. A greater number of men spoke at grand rounds across specialties and training (55%, χ2 = 450.4, P < .01). Men represented a greater proportion of invited speakers (62%, χ2 = 13.23, P < .01). Overall, men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency (49% women). Invited and endowed speakers were more likely to be introduced by their professional title (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.01; P = .01). Title use and representation varied by specialty.

Conclusions: Women remain underrepresented as grand rounds and invited speakers. Men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency. Differences between departments suggested that introduction protocols increased title use, and consideration of gender balance could be used to improve gender representation.

研究表明,女性在学术专业的大查房中代表性不足。当女性被邀请作为演讲者时,与男性相比,她们不太可能被介绍自己的专业头衔。本研究的目的是确定在大型会议上介绍演讲者时影响专业头衔使用的因素。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,对2017年10月至2020年3月期间美国一家大型学术医疗中心的内科、神经内科、妇产科、儿科、精神病学和外科进行了大查房。根据演讲者的头衔、介绍人和演讲者的性别、介绍人和演讲者的培训水平以及演讲者所在的机构对介绍进行编码。结果:共有386个独特的大报告会和特邀讲师被审查,总共有717个介绍。在各专业和培训的大检查中,男性发言的人数较多(55%,χ2 = 450.4, P < 0.01)。男性在受邀演讲者中所占比例较大(62%,χ2 = 13.23, P < 0.01)。总体而言,男性和女性被介绍其专业头衔的频率相似(女性占49%)。受邀演讲者和捐赠演讲者更有可能通过他们的专业头衔被介绍(优势比,1.85;95%置信区间为1.14-3.01;P = 0.01)。职称的使用和表示因专业而异。结论:女性在圆桌会议和特邀演讲中所占的比例仍然不足。男性和女性被介绍其职业头衔的频率相似。部门之间的差异表明,引入议定书增加了职称的使用,考虑性别平衡可以用来改善性别代表性。
{"title":"Professional Title Use and Gender Representation During Grand Rounds and Invited Lectureships Across Specialties.","authors":"Alexandra Hernandez, Mollie C Marr, Alexandra Pincus, Karen J Brasel","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.003","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies show that women are underrepresented in grand rounds across academic specialties. When women are invited as speakers, they are less likely to be introduced by their professional title compared to men. The purpose of this study was to determine what factors influenced the use of professional titles when introducing speakers at grand rounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, observational study of grand rounds from October 2017 to March 2020 for the departments of internal medicine, neurology, OB/Gyn, pediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery at a large, academic medical center in the United States. Introductions were coded for the use of speakers' title, introducer and speaker gender, introducer and speaker training level, and speaker home institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 386 unique grand rounds and invited lectureships were reviewed for a total of 717 introductions. A greater number of men spoke at grand rounds across specialties and training (55%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 450.4, <i>P</i> < .01). Men represented a greater proportion of invited speakers (62%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.23, <i>P</i> < .01). Overall, men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency (49% women). Invited and endowed speakers were more likely to be introduced by their professional title (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.01; <i>P</i> = .01). Title use and representation varied by specialty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women remain underrepresented as grand rounds and invited speakers. Men and women were introduced by their professional title with similar frequency. Differences between departments suggested that introduction protocols increased title use, and consideration of gender balance could be used to improve gender representation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485238/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144584957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Call for Papers: Improving Health Care Access. 征文:改善医疗保健服务。
Q2 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.7812/TPP/25.098
{"title":"Call for Papers: Improving Health Care Access.","authors":"","doi":"10.7812/TPP/25.098","DOIUrl":"10.7812/TPP/25.098","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":"29 3","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12485244/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145201051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Permanente journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1