Therapeutic Advances in Hematology最新文献

Background: Late acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with little data regarding treatment and outcomes. There is no standard treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) late aGVHD, especially for steroid-refractory (SR) GI late aGVHD. Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the migration of both naive and activated lymphocytes into the GI endothelium, has been verified to be effective for SR GI aGVHD.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and safety of vedolizumab as the second line for SR GI late aGVHD in seven patients after allo-HSCT.

Results: Four patients received two doses of vedolizumab infusion, while three patients received only one dose of vedolizumab infusion. The complete response and partial response rates were 57.1% (4/7) and 42.9% (3/7), respectively. No patient progressed to chronic GVHD during the period of follow-up. There was no severe adverse event related to vedolizumab.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that vedolizumab is expected to ameliorate SR GI late aGVHD. Further data on the treatment timing, efficacy, and safety of vedolizumab are warranted in prospective clinical trials.

Background: Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII; susoctocog alfa) is indicated for the treatment of bleeding events (BEs) in adults with acquired hemophilia A (AHA).

Objectives: To assess the safety, utilization, and effectiveness of rpFVIII in clinical practice.

Design: EU post-authorization safety study (PASS) (NCT03199794) was a multicenter, noninterventional, post-authorization safety study conducted in adults with AHA.

Methods: Data were collected retrospectively or prospectively for up to 180 days after the last rpFVIII dose. The primary objective was safety, as assessed by adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) (e.g. immunogenicity, hypersensitivity reactions, thromboembolic events). Secondary endpoints included immunogenicity, rpFVIII hemostatic effectiveness, and rpFVIII utilization.

Results: Fifty patients were enrolled; 31 completed the study. The median (range) follow-up for patients who completed or discontinued the study was 178 (26-371) days. The median (range) first dose of rpFVIII was 54.0 (11-200) U/kg. Thirty patients reported 46 SAEs; 5 SAEs were considered probably related to rpFVIII, of which 1 was lack of rpFVIII efficacy, and 4 were AESIs: drug resistance due to FVIII inhibition (one patient), antibody test positive for anti-pFVIII inhibitors (one patient), and de novo anti-pFVIII inhibitors (two patients). No hypersensitivity reactions or thromboembolic events were reported. Of the 50 initial BEs, 37 resolved [in a median (interquartile range) of 8.0 (4.0-16.0) days].

Conclusion: Results from this real-world study support the use of rpFVIII for AHA, aligning with findings from the clinical trial of rpFVIII (NCT01178294) in the treatment of BEs in adults with AHA.

Trial registration: EUPAS16055; NCT03199794.

Background: Generics imatinib became an alternative treatment option for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in China. However, clinicians and patients alike harbor concerns regarding the long-term safety of generic imatinib.

Objectives: Patients with chronic phase CML receiving frontline imatinib treatment.

Design: A retrospective study was used to evaluate the blood concentration, effectiveness, and safety of generic in 170 CML patients.

Methods: Imatinib plasma concentrations were detected by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Results: Among the 170 patients, 73 (42.9%) patients treated with branded imatinib as first-line therapy, while 22 (12.9%) switched to generic imatinib during treatment due to economic considerations. No significant differences in trough concentrations between branded and generic imatinib (1549.9 ± 648.8 ng/mL vs 1479.0 ± 507.0 ng/mL; p = 0.95). During the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in molecular response rates (major molecular response (MMR): 33.3% vs 37.0%; deep molecular response: 56.9% vs 42.9%, p = 0.17) between the branded and generic imatinib. Both groups showed similar rates of switching to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (11.8% vs 15.1%, p = 0.56). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in event-free survival or failure-free survival between branded and generic imatinib. Twenty-two (12.9%) switched to generic imatinib during treatment, 68.2% maintained their level of response, 27.3% improved, and only one patient (4.5%) lost MMR. There were no significant differences in the incidence of various adverse events.

Conclusion: Generic imatinib are equally effective and safe compared to branded molecules, both for newly diagnosed patients and those who switch from branded.

This is a case of hemophagocytic intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) with central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Although R-CHOP chemotherapy regimen has been shown significant improvement in survival rate. The prognosis and outcomes remain unsatisfactory, which is identified as outstanding challenges and need solutions. Gene and molecular profiling studies may provide new therapeutic strategies, especially the BCR/TLR/IL-1R/NF-κB signaling pathway in IVLBCL. Here, we treated the hemophagocytic IVLBCL CNS-involved patient with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) to block NF-κB pathway, and indicated that the second-generation BTKi zanubrutinib-based treatment was feasible and efficient.